Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Aug 11;151(1):67–73. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13287

Evaluating the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the physical and mental well‐being of obstetricians and gynecologists in Turkey

Pınar Yalçın Bahat 1,, Merve Aldıkaçtıoğlu Talmaç 1, Ayşegül Bestel 1, Nura F Topbas Selcuki 2, Ozan Karadeniz 1, Ibrahim Polat 1
PMCID: PMC9087761  PMID: 32602562

Abstract

Objective

To apply online surveying to assess the general physical and mental well‐being of obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) working in COVID‐19 designated hospitals in Turkey.

Methods

A prospective survey‐based study using an online survey platform. Three hundred participants working at COVID‐19 designated hospitals in Turkey identified from a hospital database were sent a link to the survey by email between April 29 and May 20, 2020.

Results

A total of 253 OB/GYNs (31 consultants and 222 residents) completed the survey, for a response rate of 84.3%. Of respondents, 191 (76.4%) were anxious about coming into contact with pregnant women infected with COVID‐19. 74.4% stated that they were afraid of getting sick. 64.8% reported that they had fallen into despair at times because of the pandemic. 66.5% stated that their family lives were affected. 72.4% started living separately from their families because of the pandemic.

Conclusion

Despite the difficulties in patient care during the pandemic, OB/GYNs continued providing for their patients, which reflected positively on their perceptions of the profession. The importance of trust in the national healthcare system, presence of adequate PPE, finding a suitable coping mechanism, and family support were essential for Turkish OB/GYNs during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04327531.

Turkish obstetricians/gynecologists reported anxiety and stress caused by the current situation and future implications of the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Keywords: Anxiety, COVID‐19, Obstetricians/gynecologists, Pandemic, Stress, Survey, Turkey

Short abstract

Turkish obstetricians/gynecologists reported anxiety and stress caused by the current situation and future implications of the COVID‐19 pandemic.

1. INTRODUCTION

Global outbreaks of infectious diseases have acute and long‐term effects on the mental health of healthcare workers. 1 Since the outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the announcement of the first positive case in Turkey on March 11, 2020, COVID‐19 has become a source of significant stress and worry both nationally and globally. 2 The uncertainty about the virus’ effects on individuals, lack of a cure and a vaccine, and an increase in the workload of healthcare workers are the main causes of stress. 1

Sleep disturbances, stress, anxiety, and fear of contagion were among the mental health problems observed among healthcare workers during COVID‐19 3 as well as during previous international outbreaks such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Lee et al. 4 observed higher levels of depression, anxiety, and post‐traumatic stress among healthcare workers compared with non‐healthcare workers 1 year after the outbreak of SARS. A study from China found that the majority of healthcare workers who treated COVID‐19 patients suffered from depression, anxiety, insomnia, and stress. 5

The SARS epidemic in 2003 caused a 10% fatality rate among healthcare workers. 6 Furthermore, in 2014, the Ebola outbreak in West Africa caused the death of hundreds of healthcare workers. 7 One of the first reports from Wuhan, China, including 138 patients hospitalized due to COVID‐19, stated that close to 30% of these patients were healthcare workers, who presumably became infected in the hospitals. 8

The COVID‐19 pandemic has raised many questions and dilemmas surrounding the physical and mental health status of healthcare workers. The level of risk for healthcare workers treating COVID‐19 patients is unclear, as well as the implications for them, their families, and their patients. The present study evaluated the opinions of obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) working in COVID‐19 designated hospitals in Turkey. The aim was to assess the general physical and mental well‐being of OB/GYNs during the COVID‐19 pandemic, to understand the effects of the challenges they faced at work and in their private lives, and to see whether the pandemic had affected their perception of the future.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective survey‐based study was conducted between April 29 and May 20, 2020, using the database of the Health Sciences University Istanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital. A self‐administered online survey consisting of 79 non‐validated questions was developed using SurveyMonkey (SVMK Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA) by an expert group of two gynecologists and one perinatologist. The study protocol was approved by the institution’s Ethics Committee, the National Research Committee, and was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04327531). The principles of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed in carrying out this study. Before starting the survey, participants were informed that the survey was intended for research and that their participation would be anonymous. Those who agreed were directed to the survey by the program. A separate informed consent was not obtained.

A total of 300 OB/GYNs, who were or had been resident physicians or consultant physicians in the department of obstetrics and gynecology and whose contact information was in the database, received a link to the survey by email. The survey took 7–8 minutes to complete. Participants did not have to answer all the questions In order to complete the survey. Exclusion criteria were physicians who were retired or did not currently work in a designated COVID‐19 hospital, physicians from other specialties, and physicians who were on leave during the pandemic for various reasons. Inclusion criteria were OB/GYNs active during the pandemic period at a designated COVID‐19 hospital, regardless of gender, age, experience, and duration of employment.

The survey included questions about the respondents’ demographic characteristics, changes in their OB/GYN practice during the pandemic period, and basic knowledge of COVID‐19. Furthermore, questions evaluating fear and stress associated with the pandemic and those assessing physicians’ attitudes toward COVID‐19‐related precautions were also included.

Data from the completed surveys were saved on the SurveyMonkey database and analyzed using Stata version 14 (StataCorp LLC, TX, USA). Continuous data were checked for normality of distribution using the Shapiro‐Wilk test. Continuous data that did not fit a normal distribution were described using means with standard deviations (SD). Categorical data were described using frequencies (percentages). The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.78 with an acceptable internal consistency. 9

3. RESULTS

A total of 253 OB/GYNs completed the survey, for a response rate of 84.3% (31 [12.5%] consultants and 217 [87.5%] residents). The demographic characteristics of the respondents are shown in Table 1. Mean age of respondents and mean length of employment were 45.07 ± 11.66 and 14.82 ± 11.21 years, respectively.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of survey respondents. a , b

Characteristics
Age, y 45.07 ± 11.66
Length of employment, y 14.82 ± 11.21
Smoker (more than 1 cigarette a day)
Yes 37 (14.8)
No 213 (85.2)
Gender
Female 135 (54.4)
Male 113 (45.6)
Resident or consultant
Resident 217 (87.5)
Consultant 31 (12.5)
History of chronic diseases
Yes 47 (18.8)
No 203 (81.2)
Marital status
Single 59 (23.8)
Married with children 169 (68.1)
Married without children 20 (8.1)
a

Values are given as mean ± SD or number (percentage).

b

Participants were allowed to skip questions. Therefore, numbers do not always add up to 253 (total number of participants).

Data concerning the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic and respondents’ health‐related concerns are shown in Tables 2 and 3. 48% came into contact with COVID‐19 positive patients and 67.9% (n=169) believed that COVID‐19 could permanently harm their health. A total of 78.2% (n=194) reported that they felt anxious while treating COVID‐19 positive patients. The majority of the respondents (n=186, 74.4%) stated that they were afraid of getting sick during this period. In addition, 64.8% reported that they had fallen into despair at times because of the pandemic.

Table 2.

Responses to questions concerning the COVID‐19 pandemic and its effects. a

Question No. (%)
Have you ever been in quarantine before?
Yes 24 (9.6)
No 226 (90.4)
Do you think COVID‐19 can permanently harm your health?
Yes 169 (67.9)
No 80 (32.1)
Level of public awareness
Low 127 (50.8)
Middle 114 (45.6)
High 9 (9.6)
Was the national health system’s response sufficient?
Yes 181 (72.7)
No 68 (27.3)
Were you infected with COVID‐19?
Yes 22 (8.8)
No 228 (91.2)
Have you been in contact with COVID‐19 positive patients?
Yes 120 (48.0)
No 130 (52.0)
Do you think you have enough knowledge on COVID‐19?
Yes 187 (74.8)
No 63 (25.2)
Were you adequately informed by your hospital about COVID‐19?
Yes 127 (51.2)
No 121 (48.8)
Was the PPE supply in your hospital adequate?
Yes 146 (59.8)
No 98 (40.2)
Do you wear a mask in your hospital?
Yes 237 (96.3)
No 9 (3.7)
Do you wear masks outside the hospital?
Yes 240 (96.0)
No 10 (4.0)
Do you think patients know how to use PPE?
Yes 181 (72.4)
No 69 (27.6)
Do you feel anxious when you care for COVID‐19 positive patients?
Yes 194 (78.2)
No 54 (21.8)
Do the patients with fever make you anxious?
Yes 195 (78.0)
No 55 (22.0)
Are you expecting increased violence against healthcare workers in the future?
Yes 196 (78.1)
No 55 (21.9)
Should the number of security guards be increased at the hospitals?
Yes 213 (85.2)
No 37 (14.8)
Did the attitudes of patients' relatives toward healthcare workers change?
Yes 81 (32.3)
No 170 (67.7)
Are you allergic to the materials of PPE?
Yes 93 (37.1)
No 158 (62.9)

Abbreviation: PPE, personal protective equipment.

a

Participants were allowed to skip questions. Therefore, numbers do not always add up to 253 (total number of participants).

Table 3.

Responses to questions concerning the COVID‐19 pandemic and family life.

Question No. (%)
Are you concerned about your family?
Yes 199 (79.3)
No 52 (20.7)
Did you sleep well during the pandemic?
Yes 120 (47.8)
No 131 (52.2)
Did you sleep well before?
Yes 187 (74.5)
No 64 (25.5)
If you have children, do you live together or separated?
Together 56 (27.6)
Separated (134 provided length of separation: mean, 24.33 ± 8.50 days) 147 (72.4)
How did staying away from your family affect you?
Not affected 37 (21.5)
Less affected 34 (19.7)
Neutral 31 (18.0)
More affected 70 (40.7)
Has your family life been affected?
Yes 161 (66.5)
No 81 (33.5)
Does the possibility of a 14‐day isolation scare you?
Yes 143 (57.4)
No 106 (42.6)
How has COVID‐19 pandemic impacted your view of life?
Positive 136 (55.1)
Negative 111 (44.9)
Which part of your life has gained importance because of the pandemic?
Family 194 (77.6)
Business 3 (1.2)
Social Life 46 (18.4)
Money 7 (2.8)
How did the pandemic affect your sexual life?
Positive 129 (55.6)
Negative 103 (44.4)
Are you calling your loved ones more often?
Yes 200 (80.3)
No 49 (19.7)
Are there times you fall into despair?
Yes 162 (64.8)
No 88 (35.2)
Are you afraid of getting sick?
Yes 186 (74.4)
No 64 (25.6)
What do you do to relax?
Yoga 7 (2.9)
Breathing exercises 19 (7.9)
Meditation 60 (6.7)
Sleep 40 (16.7)
Watch TV 158 (65.8)
a

Participants were allowed to skip questions. Therefore, numbers do not always add up to 253 (total number of participants).

Many respondents (n=161, 66.5%) stated that their family lives were affected during this period (Table 3). 199 participants (79.3%) stated concerns about their families and the majority, 72.4%, started living separately from their families because of the pandemic. For 194 participants (77.6%) family has gained importance.

To cope with pandemic‐related stress, respondents stated that they watched TV (66%), slept (17%), did yoga (3%), meditated (7%), and performed breathing exercises (8%) to relax (Table 3). An increase in supplement intake was observed (34.8% vs. 55.6%). Respondents began using herbal preparations and, to a lesser extent, complementary medicine supplements (Table 4).

Table 4.

Responses to questions related to the COVID‐19 pandemic and complementary medicine. a

Question No. (%)
Do you use supplements?
Yes 139 (55.6)
No 111 (44.4)
Have you ever used supplements before?
Yes 87 (34.8)
No 163 (65.2)
Have you started eating healthier?
Yes 224 (89.2)
No 27 (10.8)
Did you have a healthy diet before?
Yes 191 (76.1)
No 60 (23.9)
Have you received any complementary medicine treatments during this period?
Yes 38 (15.1)
No 213 (84.9)
Have the complementary medicine methods been effective?
Yes 100 (40.5)
No 147 (59.5)
Do you use any herbal preparations?
Yes 59 (23.8)
No 189 (76.2)
a

Participants were allowed to skip questions. Therefore, numbers do not always add up to 253 (total number of participants).

Responses related to OB/GYN practice during this period are shown in Table 5. A total of 191 (76.7%) respondents reported that they were afraid of coming into contact with pregnant women with confirmed COVID‐19 and 139 (56.1%) thought that vertical transmission from mother to newborn could be possible. It was observed that 204 (82.3%) respondents did not initiate labor earlier during this period; furthermore, 129 (51.8%) reported that they did not opt for more cesarean deliveries despite their fear of exposure. Although 174 (69.9%) respondents thought that an adequate maternal–fetal service was provided during the pandemic, 203 (81.5%) believed that their workload would increase significantly afterwards. In addition, 204 (82.6%) respondents stated concerns regarding pandemic‐associated malpractice cases.

Table 5.

Responses to questions related to OB/GYN practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic. a

Question No. (%)
Do COVID‐19 positive pregnant women scare you?
Yes 191 (76.7)
No 58 (23.3)
Is there vertical transmission?
Yes 139 (56.1)
No 109 (43.9)
Should COVID‐19 positive mothers breastfeed?
Yes 188 (75.8)
No 60 (24.2)
Could you provide adequate maternal–fetal care during the pandemic?
Yes 174 (69.9)
No 75 (30.1)
Will your workload increase after the pandemic?
Yes 203 (81.5)
No 46 (18.5)
Could you monitor pregnancies adequately during the pandemic?
Yes 121 (48.6)
No 128 (51.4)
Did you initiate labor earlier because of the pandemic?
Yes 44 (17.7)
No 204 (82.3)
Did you opt more for cesarean?
Yes 120 (48.2)
No 129 (51.8)
Do the malpractice cases that may be related to the patients you see during this period disturb you?
Yes 204 (82.6)
No 43 (17.4)
a

Participants were allowed to skip questions. Therefore, numbers do not always add up to 253 (total number of participants).

While 167 (67.3%) respondents reported that they were worried about their future, this worry stemmed from economic concerns (n=170, 69.1%). The majority of respondents (n=239, 96.4%) expected a great economic crisis following the pandemic (Table 6).

Table 6.

Responses to questions related to the COVID‐19 pandemic and the future. a

Question No. (%)
Do you think that salary payments could not be made in the future?
Yes 145 (58.0)
No 105 (42.0)
Are you afraid of the possible complications of COVID‐19 that we are currently unaware of?
Yes 201 (80.4)
No 49 (19.6)
How were the working conditions of your colleagues during the pandemic?
Good 61 (24.6)
Bad 187 (75.4)
Do you believe you can cure Covid‐19 patients?
Yes 214 (85.9)
No 35 (14.1)
Do you still love your job under these conditions?
Yes 161 (64.7)
No 88 (35.3)
How did your perspective on your profession change?
Positive 156 (63.2)
Negative 91 (36.8)
What do you want to change in your life after the pandemic?
Family 74 (36.1)
Business 71 (34.6)
The place you live 72 (35.1)
Are you worried about your future?
Yes 167 (67.3)
No 81 (32.7)
How do you see the situation in our country compared to other countries?
Good 141 (56.6)
Same 82 (32.9)
Bad 26 (10.4)
What worries you the most about the future?
Family 76 (30.9)
Economy 170 (69.1)
Do you think there will be an economic crisis after the pandemic?
Yes 239 (96.4)
No 9 (3.6)
Do you believe that the world will change after the pandemic?
Yes 198 (79.2)
No 52 (20.8)
a

Participants were allowed to skip questions. Therefore, numbers do not always add up to 253 (total number of participants).

4. DISCUSSION

The survey results showed that OB/GYNs were concerned about their health and feared contracting COVID‐19 while treating infected patients. This fear is not unfounded. According to recent studies, healthcare workers are three times more likely than the general population to contract COVID‐19 and be vectors of transmission. 10 Similar results were also reported during the SARS epidemic. 11

However, having access to personal protective equipment (PPE; gloves, protective eyewear, jumpsuit, mask) eased this health‐related fear. When work conditions at the designated pandemic hospitals were questioned, 60% of OB/GYNs reported that the supply of PPE was adequate. In the Lombardy province of Italy where the pandemic was severe, obstetricians stated that access to PPE was one of the most important aspects of dealing with health‐related fear while treating their patients. 12 In the current survey, 51% of participants felt adequately informed by their hospitals about COVID‐19 and 70% felt that they could provide adequate maternal–fetal care. Another recent study also showed that well‐informed physicians with adequate access to PPE provided better care to their patients and scored better during psychological evaluation. 13

This present survey was conducted at the time when the pandemic peaked in Turkey. However, the results regarding the conditions in the hospitals and physicians’ opinions regarding their working situations were better than expected. Of the respondents, 63% stated that their perceptions of their profession had changed positively during this period. This view was also reflected in their perception of the Turkish health system. A high percentage (72.7%) stated that they found the Turkish national health system’s response sufficient, which can be interpreted as their approval of the management of the pandemic in Turkey.

An important stress factor for respondents during the pandemic was their families and the possibility of infecting them. Therefore, 72% had started living separately during this period. Similarly, in a study conducted with family physicians, their main concern and cause of stress during the pandemic was their families. 14 In the current study, 44% of respondents reported a negative effect of the pandemic on their sexual lives. Despite these negative impacts on family life, respondents expressed that social relationships within their families improved, with 78% reporting that family life had gained in importance. Studies conducted during previous international outbreaks/epidemics also showed that although the well‐being of family members was a stress factor for healthcare workers, a strong family bond, especially for female healthcare workers, significantly reduced anxiety levels and depression in the long term. 15 , 16

When responding to questions on their OB/GYN practice, COVID‐19‐positive pregnant women posed the greatest fear. Although COVID‐19 positivity in pregnant women is considered an indication for cesarean delivery in some guidelines, 17 , 18 this did not change clinical practice in Turkey. Of those responding to the present survey, 52% did not opt for more cesarean delivery during the pandemic and 82% did not start labor earlier. In addition, the potential risk of vertical transmission has become a major concern for OB/GYNs worldwide, although there is still no supporting data. 20 According to the present survey, 56% of respondents thought that there might be vertical transmission, while a high percentage (76%) advocated breastfeeding. Separation is recommended in situations where the mother is in a severe or critical condition, and breastfeeding either directly or through pumping is recommended to maintain milk production. 18

Despite the difficulties in patient care during the pandemic, survey respondents believed that they had been able to provide adequate maternal–fetal care. However, they were still worried about unforeseen complications, which could have medicolegal implications following the pandemic. According to studies conducted during previous coronavirus epidemics, a higher rate of maternal and fetal complications such as spontaneous miscarriage, preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction, admission to the intensive care unit, renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy were observed. 19 , 20 , 21 Thorough care and good communication with patients during this period are vital in avoiding such complications. 22

There are several limitations to this study. The number of participants was limited and they were mostly situated in hospitals in or around Istanbul. A more nationwide, uniform distribution with a larger cohort should be aimed for in future studies. In addition, there was not a balance between the number of residents and consultants, so the survey does not clearly reflect the differences which could arise according to the workload within the specialty. However, since the main focus was to evaluate OB/GYNs’ perception of the pandemic, such an imbalance was of minimal concern for this study. One of the main strengths of this study was its timing, which was during the peak of the pandemic in Turkey. Therefore, the results directly reflected the effects of pandemic when the burden was at its highest.

As of June 24, 2020, 3 083 121 people had been tested for COVID‐19 in Turkey and 191 657 (0.6%) were confirmed positive. Out of the confirmed cases, there have been 5025 fatalities (0.26%). 23 A total of 22 OB/GYNs who participated in the present survey tested positive for COVID‐19. They had to be quarantined and all recovered fully. Nationwide data on the percentage of OB/GYNs who have tested positive for COVID‐19 are not yet published. Similarly, worldwide information is also not available.

In conclusion, as is likely for all healthcare workers, the pandemic period has been a stressful and worrisome period for OB/GYNs surveyed in Turkey. Health and family‐related concerns were the main stressors. Despite the difficulties in patient care during the pandemic, OB/GYNs continued to provide care, which reflected positively on their perceptions of the profession. The importance of trust in the national healthcare system, presence of adequate PPE, finding a suitable coping mechanism, and family support were essential for Turkish OB/GYNs during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

PYB contributed to conception and design, manuscript drafting, and revision. MAT contributed to interpretation of data. AB contributed to manuscript drafting. NFTS critically revised the manuscript. OK contributed to acquisition of data. IP contributed to statistical analysis and supervision.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Badahdah AM, Khamis F, Mahyijari NA. The psychological well‐being of physicians during COVID‐19 outbreak in Oman. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. World Health Organization . Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19). Situation Report 134. 2 June 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/defaultsource/coronaviruse/situationreports/20200602‐covid‐19‐sitrep‐134.pdf?sfvrsn=cc95e5d5_2. Accessed June 2, 2020.
  • 3. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;S0889‐1591(20)30845‐X. 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lee AM, Wong JG, McAlonan GM, et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52:233–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to Coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e203976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dwyer J, Tsai DF‐C. Developing the duty to treat: HIV, SARS, and the next epidemic. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:7–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Walker NF, Whitty CJ. Tackling emerging infections: Clinical and public health lessons from the West African Ebola virus disease outbreak, 2014–2015. Clin Med (Lond). 2015;15:457–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061–1069 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:1273–1296. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Harrington RA, Elkind MS, Benjamin IJ. Protecting medical trainees on the COVID‐19 frontlines saves us all. Circulation. 2020;141:e775–e777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Maunder RG, Lancee WJ, Rourke S, et al. Factors associated with the psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on nurses and other hospital workers in Toronto. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:938–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ferrazzi EM, Frigerio L, Cetin I, et al. COVID‐19 Obstetrics Task Force, Lombardy, Italy: Executive management summary and short report of outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;149:377–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kisely S, Warren N, McMahon L, Dalais C, Henry I, Siskind D. Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: Rapid review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2020;369:m1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lemire F. COVID‐19: Early reflections. Can Fam Physician. 2020;66:380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Su TP, Lien TC, Yang CY, et al. Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity and psychological adaptation of the nurses in a structured SARS caring unit during outbreak: A prospective and periodic assessment study in Taiwan. J Pyschiatr Res. 2007;41:119–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sim K, Chong PN, Chan YH, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome‐related psychiatric and posttraumatic morbidities and coping responses in medical staff within a primary health care setting in Singapore. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:1120–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Onwuzurike C, Meadows AR, Nour NM. Examining inequities associated with changes in obstetric and gynecologic care delivery during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136:37–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Poon LC, Yang H, Kapur A, et al. Global interim guidance on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) during pregnancy and puerperium from FIGO and allied partners: Information for healthcare professionals. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;149:273–286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Qiao J. What are the risks of COVID‐19 infection in pregnant women? Lancet. 2020;395:760–762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DA. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and pregnancy: What obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:415–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Masmejan S, Pomar L, Lepigeon K, Favre G, Baud D, Rieder W. COVID‐19 and pregnancy [in French]. Rev Med Suisse. 2020;16:944–946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zaigham M, Andersson O. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with COVID‐19: A systematic review of 108 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):823–829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Turkish Ministry of Health [website]. Current situation in Turkey. https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/. Accessed June 2, 2020.

Articles from International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES