Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2022 Apr 28;16(4):e0010402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010402

COX-2 is required to mediate crosstalk of ROS-dependent activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling with pro-inflammatory response and defense-related NO enhancement during challenge of macrophage-like cell line with Giardia duodenalis

Yudan Zhao 1,#, Yongwu Yang 1,#, Min Liu 1, Xuening Qin 1, Xiran Yu 1, Huimin Zhao 1, Xiaoyun Li 1, Wei Li 1,*
Editor: Andrew Scott MacDonald2
PMCID: PMC9089906  PMID: 35482821

Abstract

Giardia duodenalis, the causative agent of giardiasis, is among the most important causes of waterborne diarrheal diseases around the world. Giardia infection may persist over extended periods with intestinal inflammation, although minimal. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 is well known as an important inducer of inflammatory response, while the role it played in noninvasive Giardia infection remains elusive. Here we investigated the regulatory function of COX-2 in Giardia-induced pro-inflammatory response and defense-related nitric oxide (NO) generation in macrophage-like cell line, and identified the potential regulators. We initially found that Giardia challenge induced up-regulation of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, prostaglandin (PG) E2, and COX-2 in macrophages, and pretreatment of the cells with COX-2 inhibitor NS398 reduced expressions of those pro-inflammatory factors. It was also observed that COX-2 inhibition could attenuate the up-regulated NO release and inducible NO synthase (iNOS) expression induced by Giardia. We further confirmed that Giardia-induced COX-2 up-regulation was mediated by the phosphorylation of p38 and ERK1/2 MAPKs and NF-κB. In addition, inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by NAC was shown to repress Giardia-induced activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling, up-regulation of COX-2 and iNOS, increased levels of PGE2 and NO release, and up-expressions of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Collectively, in this study, we revealed a critical role of COX-2 in modulating pro-inflammatory response and defense-related NO production in Giardia-macrophage interactions, and this process was evident to be controlled by ROS-dependent activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling. The results can deepen our knowledge of anti-Giardia inflammatory response and host defense mechanisms.

Author summary

During microbial infections, COX-2 has been well documented as a pro-inflammatory factor, while little is known about its regulatory function and mechanism. Here we described a novel role of COX-2 in regulating Giardia-induced pro-inflammatory response and defense-related NO enhancement, and this process was confirmed to be associated with ROS-dependent MAPK/NF-κB activation. The findings provide invaluable insights into the mechanisms underlying anti-Giardia host inflammatory responses, however, more research efforts should be directed to clarify why Giardia infection only induces mild inflammation in the small intestine of the host, so as to fully understand the pathogenesis of giardiasis. Anyway, in combination with the anti-apoptotic role of COX-2 in enterocytes during Giardia infection as noted recently, we could infer that COX-2 might have clinical implications for giardiasis treatment.

Introduction

Giardia duodenalis is one of the most common gastrointestinal parasites on a global scale [1], which causes an estimated 280 million cases of human infections per year [2]. The parasite also infects a broad variety of nonhuman mammals and birds and is of zoonotic concern, posing a significant threat to public health [3,4]. The life cycle of Giardia includes two stages: the disease-causing vegetative form, trophozoite, and the environmentally resistant and infective form, cyst [5]. Giardia proliferates in the small intestine and establishes an extracellular infection [6]. The majority of Giardia infections resolve spontaneously as a result of an effective host response, but some lead to chronic disease that typically manifests as diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, weight loss, intestinal lesions, and malabsorption syndrome [2,5]. Failures in the treatment of giardiasis are becoming increasingly common and there seems to be an association between Giardia infection and development of irritable bowel syndrome or food allergies even after resolution [2]. The progression of giardiasis involves complex interactions between Giardia and the host, and current knowledge about its pathogenesis is very limited [5–7].

Infection of pathogenic microorganisms or tissue damage activates innate immune system, which recruits granulocytes including macrophages to clear microbial pathogens and injured tissue, releases inflammatory mediators such as pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandins (PGs), and inflammatory enzymes including inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, and arouses cellular inflammatory response to pathogens or tissue damage [8–10]. Macrophages are well known as effector cells in human and animal Giardia infections, which can engulf trophozoites both in vitro and during infection [5,11]. TNF-α and IL-6 have been reported to be essential for effective clearance of Giardia [12–15]. There is also a significant pyroptosis-related IL-1β and IL-18 increase induced by Giardia as described recently [16]. ROS contributes to a key mechanism in which phagocytic cells induce inflammation or clear pathogens [17], and it has also been recognized as an important player in Giardia-induced intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) apoptosis [1,18]. It is noteworthy that Giardia-infected individuals exhibit increased levels of NO concentration in serum [19], which might be attributed to the enhanced NO release from immune cells, possibly macrophages. Additionally, NO exhibits significant inhibition effects on Giardia trophozoite growth and excystation process in vitro [20]. There are two main COX isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, encoded by different genes [21]. COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most tissues and appears to be responsible for the production of PGs that mediate normal physiologic functions [21]. By contrast, inducible COX-2 is expressed in most immune cells, notably macrophages, and generally considered as an important inducer of inflammation through converting arachidonic acid into pro-inflammatory PGs, majorly PGE2, and inducing generation of other pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines [21]. In spite of the common inflammation-inducing function of COX-2, it remains to be investigated whether COX-2 can act as an effective modulator affecting the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and NO that are necessary for Giardia clearance, and if this occurs, the potential upstream controllers for COX-2 regulation are also worthy of being explored, such as MAPK, NF-κB, and ROS signaling.

MAPK pathways are critical for regulating expressions of COX-2, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and iNOS, and play a role in initiating and sustaining inflammatory response and providing defense against certain pathogens [22,23]. The inflammatory response mediated by NF-κB signaling is essential for host defense against pathogens [24]. During parasitic infections, NF-κB activation was known to influence the relationship between host and pathogens through regulating innate immunity and inflammation [25]. NF-κB activity was proved to be involved in the regulation of COX-2 and iNOS expression [26,27]. However, in the context of Giardia infection, nothing is known about the involvement of MAPK/NF-κB signaling in regulation of COX-2 expression and potential COX-2-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine and NO production in macrophages. In addition to the regular role of ROS as described earlier, it is also able to operate as both a signaling molecule and a mediator of inflammation [17]. It has been reported that ROS-dependent activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling provides contributions to Propionibacterium acnes-induced COX-2/PGE2 and iNOS/NO in macrophages [28]. Thus, it is also worth studying the correlation of ROS signaling with MAPK/NF-κB activation, as well as its influence on the potential COX-2-mediated anti-Giardia host defense responses in macrophages.

To date, the regulators in inflammatory response of macrophages to Giardia infection are still largely unknown. The objective of this study is to analyze the potential function of COX-2 in mediating Giardia duodenalis-induced pro-inflammatory response and defense-related NO production in macrophage-like cell line, and to determine if this process is regulated by ROS-dependent MAPK/NF-κB signaling.

Methods

Cell culture

The macrophage J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cell lines [29] used to interact with Giardia trophozoites in this study were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cells were cultured in high-glucose DMEM (Hyclone, Logan, USA) containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Cellmax, Beijing, China) and maintained in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Cell lines were passaged using 0.25% trypsin (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) on reaching nearly 80% confluency. Cells from passages 3–6 were used.

Parasite culture

G. duodenalis WB strain genotyped as assemblage A was used in this study (ATCC 30957, Manassas, USA). Trophozoites were axenically cultivated at 37°C in 15 mL conical tubes in modified TYI-S-33 culture medium containing 10% FBS and 0.1% bovine bile supplemented with 0.1% gentamycin and 1% penicillin/streptomycin [30]. Parasite cultures were harvested by chilling on ice for 15 min. Detached trophozoites were centrifuged, washed with PBS, resuspended in cell culture medium, counted using a hematocytometer, and used to interact with macrophages at a ratio of 10 parasites/cell. In time-course experiments, trophozoites were added at different time points and cells harvested together.

qPCR analysis

Cells were seeded in 12-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well), incubated for 12 h, exposed to Giardia for the indicated time periods, and washed with ice-cold PBS to remove parasites. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA (~1 g) by reverse transcription using a HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Primers used for qPCR (S1 Table) were designed using NCBI primer BLAST tool and synthesized by SangonBiotech (Shanghai, China). qPCR was performed using a SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on a LC480 Lightcycler system (Roche, Indianapolis, USA). The expression of target genes relative to the housekeeping gene, β-actin, was analyzed according to the 2-ΔΔCt method.

Western blot analysis

Cells were seeded in 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well), incubated for 12 h, exposed to Giardia for the indicated time periods, and washed with ice-cold PBS to remove parasites. Total cellular proteins were extracted from each group of cells using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing protease inhibitor (1% PMSF; Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Protein concentration was determined by an enhanced BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Protein expression levels were measured by western blot analysis. In brief, proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in PBST for 2 h at room temperature (RT), followed by overnight exposure to primary antibodies against IL-1β (1:500 dilution in PBST), IL-6 (1:500), TNF-α (1:500), β-actin (1:1000), COX-2 (1:500), iNOS (1:500), p38 (1:1000), p-p38 (1:1000), ERK1/2 (1:1000), p-ERK1/2 (1:1000), NF-κB (1:1000), and p-NF-κB (1:1000) at 4°C. Primary antibodies were acquired from two main commercial sources (ABclonal, Wuhan, China; Bioss, Beijing, China). Membranes were washed three times in PBST and probed with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1,5000; ABMART, Shanghai, China) for 1 h at RT. Images were obtained with a GeneGnome XRQ chemiluminescence imaging system (Syngene, Cambridge, UK) and the intensity of the detected bands quantified with the NIH Image J software.

PGE2 measurement

Cells were cultured in 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well), incubated for 12 h, and exposed to Giardia for the indicated time periods. PGE2 concentration in the culture supernatants was detected by a mouse PGE2 ELISA Kit (CUSABIO, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density of each well was measured using a microplate reader at 450 nm wavelength within 10 min.

Protein inhibition

COX-2 inhibitor NS398 (50 μM, final concentration), p38 inhibitor SB202190 (10 μM), ERK1/2 inhibitor SCH772984 (10 μM), and NF-κB inhibitor JSH-23 (50 μM) (Selleckchem, Houston, USA), as well as ROS inhibitor NAC (10 μM; APEXBIO, Houston, USA) were used to inhibit target proteins in this study. All inhibitors were applied 1 h prior to Giardia exposure.

NO measurement

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (1 × 104 cells/well), cultured for 12 h, and exposed to Giardia for the indicated time periods. NO production represented by nitrite concentration in supernatants of cultured macrophages was assayed with Griess reaction using a NO Assay Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The absorbance was measured at the wavelength of 540 nm.

ROS measurement

Cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 per well. After 12 h incubation, cells were exposed to Giardia for the indicated time periods and washed with ice-cold PBS to remove parasites. The intracellular ROS levels were measured using an oxidation-sensitive fluorescent probe DCFH-DA Kit, and Rosup was included as a positive control (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The DCF fluorescence intensity in cells was measured using a Lionheart FX Automated Microscope (BioTek, Winooski, USA). Intracellular ROS levels were also detected by flow cytometry on a BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA). Data were analyzed using the BD FACSDiva software program (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, USA), and then processed using the Flowjo software (Tree Star, Ashland, USA).

Immunofluorescence assays

Cells in 24-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well) were challenged with parasites for the indicated time periods, washed with ice-cold PBS to remove parasites, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at RT, and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton-X 100 in PBS for 10 min at RT. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation in 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at RT. Cells were incubated with anti-NF-κB antibody (dilution 1:200) with 1% BSA in PBST overnight at 4°C, and then FITC-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (dilution 1:200; Jackson, West Grove, USA) at 37°C for 1 h in the dark. Cell nucleus was stained by DAPI (2 μg/mL; Alphabio, Tianjin, China). Fluorescence images were captured and analyzed using a Lionheart FX Automated Microscope.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 7.0 program. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical significance of the differences was evaluated by the use of Student’s t-test in comparison of two groups or one-way ANOVA in comparison of three or more groups. p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).

Results

Giardia induced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression

We performed qPCR and western blot analyses to assess the effects of Giardia challenge on the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in macrophages. The levels of mRNA transcription and protein expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were markedly increased in all Giardia-exposed groups compared with the controls (p < 0.01, Fig 1). The mRNA levels of these cytokines in RAW264.7 cells increased more obviously than those in J774A.1 cells and peaked at different time points between the two cell types (Fig 1A to 1C). The change trends of protein levels of IL-1β and TNF-α at different time points were similar between J774A.1 and RAW264.7, while this is not the case for IL-6 (Fig 1D). In addition, we often observed large fold differences in mRNA levels with much more minor effects on protein levels (Fig 1). Taken together, the data implied that Giardia exposure exerted a pro-inflammatory effect on different macrophage-like cell lines.

Fig 1. Giardia induced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

(A-D) Upon Giardia trophozoite exposure for the indicated time periods, the mRNA and protein levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cells were measured by qPCR, western blot, and gray value analyses. All results were normalized against the level of β-actin. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. ** p < 0.01.

COX-2 regulated pro-inflammatory cytokine expression

COX-2 has been studied generally as an inflammatory inducer [31], the role it played in regulating inflammatory responses to microbial infections is still largely not understood. In the present study, we initially assessed if Giardia challenge could induce PGE2 production and COX-2 expression. Released PGE2 was detected by enzyme immunoassay, and COX-2 expression levels were analyzed by qPCR and western blotting. The results exhibited that Giardia triggered a significant time-dependent increase in PGE2 production in J774A.1 cells (p < 0.01, Fig 2A). Significant up-regulation of COX-2 expression was observed at both mRNA and protein levels in J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cells exposed to Giardia as early as 3 h after exposure, and in both cell types, maximal expression was observed almost at 9 h post-exposure (p < 0.01, Fig 2B and 2C). We further evaluated the role of COX-2 in regulating macrophage pro-inflammatory response during Giardia infection by the use of COX-2 inhibitor NS398. As expected, COX-2 inhibition significantly attenuated the up-regulated production of PGE2 in J774A.1 cells (p < 0.01, Fig 2D) and the elevated mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in both cell types (p < 0.01, Fig 2E–2H) induced by Giardia. The data implied that COX-2 could be an important inflammatory regulator in macrophages during Giardia infection.

Fig 2. COX-2 regulated pro-inflammatory cytokine expression.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

Unless otherwise specified, J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cells were challenged with Giardia trophozoites for the indicated time periods. (A) Giardia exposure induced PGE2 level changes as examined by enzyme immunoassay. (B,C) Upon Giardia challenge, the mRNA and protein levels of COX-2 were measured by qPCR, western blot, and gray value analyses. (D) COX-2 inhibition by its inhibitor NS398 affected Giardia-induced PGE2 enhancement as assessed by enzyme immunoassay. (E-G) COX-2 inhibition affected Giardia-induced changes of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α mRNA levels. (H) At 9 h after Giardia challenge, COX-2 inhibition affected the up-regulated protein levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α as assessed by western blot and gray value analyses. The results of qPCR and western blot analyses were normalized against the level of β-actin. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. “GiTr” reads Giardia trophozoite.

COX-2 regulated NO production and iNOS expression

NO expression by iNOS is a vital host defense mechanism against Giardia infection [5], thus it is quite interesting to identify its upstream regulator. In this study, NO release was measured by means of the Griess reaction, which was significantly increased following exposure of J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cells to Giardia within hours, whereas COX-2 inhibition by NS398 resulted in a remarkable decrease in NO release (p < 0.01, Fig 3A). In addition, inhibition of COX-2 activity by NS398 dramatically weakened the increased mRNA and protein levels of iNOS in J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cells exposed to Giardia (p < 0.01, Fig 3B and 3C), supporting the role of COX-2 as a positive NO regulator.

Fig 3. COX-2 regulated NO production and iNOS expression.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

Unless otherwise specified, J774A.1 and RAW264.7 cells were exposed to Giardia trophozoites for the indicated time periods. (A) COX-2 inhibition affected Giardia-induced increase of NO release as measured with Griess reagent method. (B) COX-2 inhibition affected the up-regulated iNOS mRNA level induced by Giardia. (C) At 9 h Giardia post-exposure, COX-2 inhibition affected the up-regulated protein level of iNOS as assessed by western blot and gray value analyses. The results of qPCR and western blot analyses were normalized against the level of β-actin. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. ** p < 0.01. Giardia trophozoite is abbreviated as “GiTr”.

MAPK/NF-κB signaling regulated COX-2 expression

Activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling is well known to be essential for host defense against microbial pathogens by inducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [32,33], while whether it can act as a COX-2 controller during Giardia infection is still not clear. In this study, we initially observed the activation of MAPK (p38 and ERK1/2) and NF-κB signaling in J774A.1 cells interacting with Giardia. The phosphorylation of p38, ERK1/2, and NF-κB was continuously increased following exposure (p < 0.01, Fig 4A). As shown in Fig 4B, Giardia challenge also promoted nuclear translocation of NF-κB. In addition, inhibitions of p38 with its inhibitor SB202190, ERK1/2 with its inhibitor SCH772984, and NF-κB with its inhibitor JSH-23 all significantly repressed Giardia-induced up-regulation of COX-2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels (p < 0.05, Fig 4C to 4H), while p38 inhibition appeared to display a minimal effect compared to ERK/NF-kB inhibition. The results implicated that MAPK/NF-κB signaling involved regulation of COX-2 in the present context.

Fig 4. MAPK/NF-κB signaling regulated COX-2 expression.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

Unless otherwise specified, J774A.1 cells were challenged with Giardia trophozoites for the indicated time periods. (A) Giardia challenge affected the phosphorylation levels of p38, ERK, and NF-κB as assessed by western blot and gray value analyses. (B) Giardia exposure affected NF-κB nuclear translocation as assayed by indirect immunofluorescence staining (scale bar = 100 μm). (C-H) p38 inhibition by SB202190, ERK inhibition by SCH772984, and NF-κB inhibition by JSH-23 affected Giardia-induced up-regulation of COX-2. (C,E,G) p38, ERK, or NF-κB inhibition affected Giardia-induced up-regulated mRNA level of COX-2. (D,F,H) At 9 h after Giardia challenge, p38, ERK, or NF-κB inhibition influenced the up-regulated protein level of COX-2 as assessed by western blot and gray value analyses. The results of qPCR and western blot analyses were normalized against the level of β-actin. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. “GiTr” reads Giardia trophozoite.

ROS influenced the activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling

As measured using DCFH-DA method and observed in Fig 5A and 5B, ROS levels were obviously increased in J774A.1 cells as early as 3 h after Giardia exposure, and NAC (ROS inhibitor) pretreatment could inhibit Giardia-induced ROS accumulation. In addition, ROS inhibition by NAC markedly repressed Giardia-induced MAPK/NF-κB activation (p < 0.01, Fig 6A), with more significant effects seen on p38 than on ERK1/2 or NF-Κb at 3 h after exposure as well as on p38 or ERK1/2 than on NF-Κb at 9 h after exposure. It was also observed that ROS inhibition could suppress Giardia-induced NF-κB nuclear translocation (Fig 6B). The results suggested that ROS played an imperative role in regulating MAPK/NF-κB signaling in Giardia-macrophage interactions.

Fig 5. Giardia triggered ROS accumulation in J774A.1 cells.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

Prior to exposure to Giardia for the indicated time periods, cells were incubated with or without ROS inhibitor NAC for 1 h. Mock groups were included. (A) ROS level was examined by fluorescence microscopy (scale bar = 1000 m). (B) ROS level was examined by flow cytometry. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented. Giardia trophozoite is abbreviated as “GiTr”.

Fig 6. ROS influenced the activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling.

Fig 6

Open in a new tab

Prior to exposure to Giardia for the indicated time periods, J774A.1 cells were incubated with or without ROS inhibitor NAC for 1 h. Mock groups were included. (A) ROS inhibition affected Giardia-induced p38, ERK, or NF-κB activation as assessed by western blot and gray value analyses. (B) ROS inhibition affected Giardia-induced NF-κB nuclear translocation as examined by indirect immunofluorescence staining (scale bar = 100 μm). The results of western blot analysis were normalized against the level of β-actin. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. ** p < 0.01. Giardia trophozoite is abbreviated as “GiTr”.

ROS mediated regulation of COX-2, PGE2, iNOS, NO, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α

In addition to the impact of ROS on MAPK/NF-κB activation just assessed, we also examined the potential function of ROS in modulating macrophage inflammatory mediators during Giardia infection. It was shown that ROS inhibition by NAC remarkably suppressed the up-regulated COX-2 and iNOS expressions and PGE2 and NO release in Giardia-exposed J774A.1 cells (p < 0.05, Fig 7A–7C and 7E). Giardia-induced up-expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α was found to be strikingly inhibited by NAC application (p < 0.01, Fig 7D and 7E). Interestingly, when NAC was applied, a more significant decrease in the mRNA and protein expressions of COX-2, iNOS, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α was seen at 9 h after Giardia exposure than at 3 h after exposure (Fig 7A, 7D, and 7E). Considering the earlier findings, it can be inferred that ROS functioned vitally in Giardia-induced macrophage inflammation.

Fig 7. ROS mediated regulation of COX-2, PGE2, iNOS, NO, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α.

Fig 7

Open in a new tab

Prior to exposure to Giardia for the indicated time periods, J774A.1 cells were incubated with or without ROS inhibitor NAC for 1 h. Mock groups were included. (A) ROS inhibition affected the up-regulated mRNA levels of COX-2 and iNOS induced by Giardia. (B) ROS inhibition affected Giardia-induced PGE2 enhancement as examined by enzyme immunoassay. (C) ROS inhibition affected the increased NO level induced by Giardia. (D) ROS inhibition influenced the up-regulated mRNA levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α induced by Giardia. (E) ROS inhibition affected the up-regulated protein levels of COX-2, iNOS, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α induced by Giardia as assessed by western blot and gray value analyses. The results of qPCR and western blot analyses were normalized against the level of β-actin. Data from triplicate wells from a representative of at least three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Giardia trophozoite is abbreviated as “GiTr”.

Discussion

In the present study, we explored if Giardia-induced pro-inflammatory response and NO enhancement can be modulated by COX-2, and if this process is controlled by tightly regulated signaling networks in macrophages. The results indicated that COX-2 operated as a promising modulator for promoting IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α expressions and PGE2 and NO production in Giardia-macrophage interactions. Further investigations revealed that COX-2-mediated anti-Giardia pro-inflammatory response and NO enhancement were under tight control of ROS-dependent MAPK/NF-κB activation (Fig 8).

Fig 8. Schematic diagram illustrating critical regulators involved in Giardia-induced pro-inflammatory response and defense-related NO enhancement in macrophages.

Fig 8

Open in a new tab

“GiTr” reads Giardia trophozoite.

Efficient immune response achieved by continuous interplay between innate and adaptive immunity is of major importance in controlling infection, and inflammation is an important and necessary part of the normal host responses to pathogens [34]. Macrophages are widely distributed innate immune cells throughout the body, which play vital roles in immunity as early effectors, initiating inflammatory response, modulating adaptive immune response, defending against microbial infections, and restoring tissue homeostasis after infection clearance [35]. Macrophages normally cooperate with neutrophils in combating microbial infections and maintaining inflammation via producing enough pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, or IL-23 [36]. TNF-α and IL-6 expressions are elevated during Giardia infection, their deficiency facilitates delayed elimination of the parasite [12–15]. Here we confirmed that macrophages up-expressed IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in response to Giardia affection. It has been noted that gut epithelial and immune cells are able to release NO that possesses antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and cytotoxic activities [5]. NO derived from iNOS produces an inhibiting effect on Giardia trophozoite growth and excystation process [20], and NO derived from neuronal NOS (nNOS) induces intestinal peristalsis to promote the process of pathogen clearance [37,38]. Competitive consumption of arginine by Giardia declines NO release from IECs and might induce apoptosis, protecting the parasite from being eliminated [39]. Yet, in answer to Giardia infection, macrophages expressing arginase 1 and iNOS are recruited to the small intestine [40]. It is of interest to note in this study that, unlike IECs, macrophages triggered in vitro by Giardia showed a time-dependent increase in NO release, possibly serving as an auxiliary defense mechanism against Giardia infection.

During microbial infections, COX-2 is studied generally as a pro-inflammatory factor, COX-2/PGE2 has been proved to be associated with inflammasome activation and M1 polarization in Salmonella Typhimurium- and Yersinia enterocolitica-infected macrophages [41]. To the best of our knowledge, here is the first study showing Giardia-induced COX-2/PGE2 enhancement in macrophages. However, some studies have indicated that COX-2/PGE2 can induce anti-inflammatory profiles in cells including macrophages or tissues infected by some intracellular protozoan parasites including Toxoplasma gondii, Trypanosoma cruzi, or Leishmania [42–46]. The difference might be due to different modes of parasitism (extracellular versus intracellular). To date, little is known about the regulatory function and mechanism of COX-2 during microbial infections, here we demonstrated an important role of COX-2 in regulating Giardia-induced pro-inflammatory response and defense-related NO enhancement in macrophages.

Reflecting on our exploration, we also discovered that p38/ERK/NF-κB signaling was activated by noninvasive Giardia and the pathways contributed to regulation of COX-2 expression in macrophages. It has been demonstrated that invasive non-typeable Haemophilus influenza-induced COX-2 and PGE2 up-regulation in lung epithelial cells is correlated with p38/NF-κB activation [47]. Up-regulated COX-2 expression and PGE2 production in enterovirus type 71-infected human neuroblastoma cells are mediated via activation of MAPK/NF-κB/AP-1 signaling [48]. ROS commonly functions as a cytotoxic agent secreted from inflammatory cells to kill off invading pathogens [49]. An interesting finding of this study is that ROS accumulated in Giardia-exposed macrophages was biologically linked to activation of p38/ERK/NF-κB signaling and regulation of COX-2-mediated IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and NO production. In reality, recombinant Treponema pallidum protein Tp0768 has been shown to promote generation of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 by macrophages through ER stress and ROS-NF-κB pathway [50]. In addition, it was known that ROS can be activated in J774A.1 cells, peritoneal macrophages, and IECs as early as 3 h after Giardia exposure [16,18], and inhibition of ROS by NAC can affect macrophage pyroptotic outcome after a 12-h exposure [16] and IEC apoptotic outcome after a 6-h exposure [18]. In contrast, here we demonstrated that ROS inhibition was able to influence macrophage pro-inflammatory and defense-related responses after a 3-h or prolonged Giardia exposure. It is also of interest to note the function of ROS in regulating MAPK/NF-kB/COX-2 signaling as early as 3 h after Giardia exposure here. Giardia-secreted peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase B has been verified as a trigger for TLR4-dependent ROS activation and pyroptotic cell death in macrophages [16]. Likewise, continued efforts are needed to identify the potential trigger for ROS-dependent regulation observed here.

In conclusion, we reported a novel role of COX-2 in mediating Giardia-induced pro-inflammatory response and defense-related NO enhancement, as well as revealed its association with ROS-dependent activation of MAPK/NF-κB signaling. The findings reached in this study provide well founded insights into the complex regulatory networks of anti-Giardia host inflammatory responses. However, in reality, only minimal intestinal inflammation is triggered by noninvasive Giardia infection [5], and the exact underlying mechanism remains elusive and thus needs to be further elucidated.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primer pairs used in qPCR analysis.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (47KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the persons who provided kind helps and suggestions to this work and the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172885) and Natural Science Fund of Heilongjiang Province for Excellent Young Scholars (YQ2020C010) to WL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Yang Y, Zhao Y, Liu L, Zhu W, Jia S, Li X, et al. The anti-apoptotic role of COX-2 during in vitro infection of human intestinal cell line by Giardia duodenalis and the potential regulators. Infect Immun. 2022; 90: e0067221. doi: 10.1128/iai.00672-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Einarsson E, Ma’ayeh S, Svard SG. An up-date on Giardia and giardiasis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;34:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li W, Li Y, Song M, Lu Y, Yang J, Tao W, et al. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in cats and dogs in Heilongjiang province, China. Vet Parasitol. 2015;208:125–34. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:110–40. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lopez-Romero G, Quintero J, Astiazaran-Garcia H, Velazquez C. Host defences against Giardia lamblia. Parasite Immunol. 2015;37:394–406. doi: 10.1111/pim.12210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cernikova L, Faso C, Hehl AB. Five facts about Giardia lamblia. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007250. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Certad G, Viscogliosi E, Chabe M, Caccio SM. Pathogenic Mechanisms of Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:561–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yao C, Narumiya S. Prostaglandin-cytokine crosstalk in chronic inflammation. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176:337–54. doi: 10.1111/bph.14530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Biswas SK, Lewis CE. NF-kappaB as a central regulator of macrophage function in tumors. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88:877–84. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0310153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fekete E, Allain T, Siddiq A, Sosnowski O, Buret AG. Giardia spp. and the gut microbiota: dangerous liaisons. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:618106. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.618106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bienz M, Dai WJ, Welle M, Gottstein B, Muller N. Interleukin-6-deficient mice are highly susceptible to Giardia lamblia infection but exhibit normal intestinal immunoglobulin A responses against the parasite. Infect Immun. 2003;71:1569–73. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1569-1573.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou P, Li E, Shea-Donohue T, Singer SM. Tumour necrosis factor alpha contributes to protection against Giardia lamblia infection in mice. Parasite Immunol. 2007;29:367–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2007.00953.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou P, Li E, Zhu N, Robertson J, Nash T, Singer SM. Role of interleukin-6 in the control of acute and chronic Giardia lamblia infections in mice. Infect Immun. 2003;71:1566–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1566-1568.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li E, Zhou P, Petrin Z, Singer SM. Mast cell-dependent control of Giardia lamblia infections in mice. Infect Immun. 2004;72:6642–9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6642-6649.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu L, Yang Y, Fang R, Zhu W, Wu J, Li X, et al. Giardia duodenalis and its secreted PPIB trigger inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in macrophages through TLR4-induced ROS signaling and A20-mediated NLRP3 deubiquitination. Cells. 2021;10:3425. doi: 10.3390/cells10123425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mittal M, Siddiqui MR, Tran K, Reddy SP, Malik AB. Reactive oxygen species in inflammation and tissue injury. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20:1126–67. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu L, Fang R, Wei Z, Wu J, Li X, Li W. Giardia duodenalis induces apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells via reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial pathway in vitro. Pathogens. 2020;9:693. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Matowicka-Karna J, Kralisz M, Kemona H. Assessment of the levels of nitric oxide (NO) and cytokines (IL-5, IL-6, IL-13, TNF, IFN-gamma) in giardiosis. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2011;49:280–4. doi: 10.5603/fhc.2011.0039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Eckmann L, Laurent F, Langford TD, Hetsko ML, Smith JR, Kagnoff MF, et al. Nitric oxide production by human intestinal epithelial cells and competition for arginine as potential determinants of host defense against the lumen-dwelling pathogen Giardia lamblia. J Immunol. 2000;164:1478–87. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.3.1478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen C. COX-2’s new role in inflammation. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:401–2. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Arthur JS, Ley SC. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:679–92. doi: 10.1038/nri3495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brummett AM, Navratil AR, Bryan JD, Woolard MD. Janus kinase 3 activity is necessary for phosphorylation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 and prostaglandin E2 synthesis by macrophages infected with Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Infect Immun. 2014;82:970–82. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01461-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dorrington MG, Fraser IDC. NF-kappaB signaling in macrophages: dynamics, crosstalk, and signal integration. Front Immunol. 2019;10:705. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ammar Z, Plazolles N, Baltz T, Coustou V. Identification of trans-sialidases as a common mediator of endothelial cell activation by African trypanosomes. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003710. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mendes KL, Lelis DF, Santos SHS. Nuclear sirtuins and inflammatory signaling pathways. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017;38:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2017.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pautz A, Art J, Hahn S, Nowag S, Voss C, Kleinert H. Regulation of the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Nitric Oxide. 2010;23:75–93. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2010.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsai HH, Lee WR, Wang PH, Cheng KT, Chen YC, Shen SC. Propionibacterium acnes-induced iNOS and COX-2 protein expression via ROS-dependent NF-kappaB and AP-1 activation in macrophages. J Dermatol Sci. 2013;69:122–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2012.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Khatua S, Simal-Gandara J, Acharya K. Understanding immune-modulatory efficacy in vitro. Chem Biol Interact. 2022;352:109776. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Keister DB. Axenic culture of Giardia lamblia in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with bile. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77:487–8. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(83)90120-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ayiomamitis GD, Notas G, Vasilakaki T, Tsavari A, Vederaki S, Theodosopoulos T, et al. Understanding the interplay between COX-2 and hTERT in colorectal cancer using a multi-omics analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:1536. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kanneganti TD. Central roles of NLRs and inflammasomes in viral infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:688–98. doi: 10.1038/nri2851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Petrilli V, Dostert C, Muruve DA, Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a danger sensing complex triggering innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:615–22. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Santos PC, Teixeira MM, Souza DG. Opportunities for the development of novel therapies based on host-microbial interactions. Pharmacol Res. 2016;112:68–83. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.He W, Heinz A, Jahn D, Hiller K. Complexity of macrophage metabolism in infection. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;68:231–9. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Weiss G, Schaible UE. Macrophage defense mechanisms against intracellular bacteria. Immunol Rev. 2015;264:182–203. doi: 10.1111/imr.12266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li E, Zhao A, Shea-Donohue T, Singer SM. Mast cell-mediated changes in smooth muscle contractility during mouse giardiasis. Infect Immun. 2007;75:4514–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00596-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li E, Zhou P, Singer SM. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase is necessary for elimination of Giardia lamblia infections in mice. J Immunol. 2006;176:516–21. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.1.516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stadelmann B, Merino MC, Persson L, Svard SG. Arginine consumption by the intestinal parasite Giardia intestinalis reduces proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS one. 2012;7:e45325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Maloney J, Keselman A, Li E, Singer SM. Macrophages expressing arginase 1 and nitric oxide synthase 2 accumulate in the small intestine during Giardia lamblia infection. Microbes Infect. 2015;17:462–7. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2015.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sheppe AEF, Kummari E, Walker A, Richards A, Hui WW, Lee JH, et al. PGE2 augments inflammasome activation and M1 polarization in macrophages infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Yersinia enterocolitica. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2447. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.de Souza G, Silva RJ, Milian ICB, Rosini AM, de Araujo TE, Teixeira SC, et al. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 modulates Toxoplasma gondii infection, immune response and lipid droplets formation in human trophoblast cells and villous explants. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92120-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pereira ACA, Silva RJ, Franco PS, de Oliveira Gomes A, Souza G, Milian ICB, et al. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors reduce Toxoplasma gondii infection and upregulate the pro-inflammatory immune response in Calomys callosus rodents and human monocyte cell line. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:225. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Carvalho de Freitas R, Lonien SCH, Malvezi AD, Silveira GF, Wowk PF, da Silva RV, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi: Inhibition of infection of human monocytes by aspirin. Exp Parasitol. 2017;182:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2017.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Arcanjo AF, LaRocque-de-Freitas IF, Rocha JD, Zamith D, Costa-da-Silva AC, Nunes MP, et al. The PGE2/IL-10 axis determines susceptibility of B-1 cell-derived phagocytes (B-1CDP) to Leishmania major infection. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Michelin MA, Silva JS, Cunha FQ. Inducible cyclooxygenase released prostaglandin mediates immunosuppression in acute phase of experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Exp Parasitol. 2005;111:71–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xu F, Xu Z, Zhang R, Wu Z, Lim JH, Koga T, et al. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae induces COX-2 and PGE2 expression in lung epithelial cells via activation of p38 MAPK and NF-kappa B. Respir Res. 2008;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-9-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tung WH, Hsieh HL, Yang CM. Enterovirus 71 induces COX-2 expression via MAPKs, NF-kappaB, and AP-1 in SK-N-SH cells: role of PGE(2) in viral replication. Cell Signal. 2010;22:234–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sorci G, Faivre B. Inflammation and oxidative stress in vertebrate host-parasite systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:71–83. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li W, Zhou X, Cai J, Zhao F, Cao T, Ning L, et al. Recombinant Treponema pallidum protein Tp0768 promotes proinflammatory cytokine secretion of macrophages through ER stress and ROS/NF-kappaB pathway. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105:353–66. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-11018-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Primer pairs used in qPCR analysis.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (47KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES