Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268223

Imaging articular cartilage in osteoarthritis using targeted peptide radiocontrast agents

Milan M Fowkes 1,#, Patricia Das Neves Borges 1,#, Fernando Cacho-Nerin 2, Paul E Brennan 3, Tonia L Vincent 1, Ngee H Lim 1,*
Editor: Nikos K Karamanos4
PMCID: PMC9089912  PMID: 35536857

Abstract

Background

Established MRI and emerging X-ray contrast agents for non-invasive imaging of articular cartilage rely on non-selective electrostatic interactions with negatively charged proteoglycans. These contrast agents have limited prognostic utility in diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA) due to the characteristic high turnover of proteoglycans. To overcome this limitation, we developed a radiocontrast agent that targets the type II collagen macromolecule in cartilage and used it to monitor disease progression in a murine model of OA.

Methods

To confer radiopacity to cartilage contrast agents, the naturally occurring tyrosine derivative 3,5-diiodo-L-tyrosine (DIT) was introduced into a selective peptide for type II collagen. Synthetic DIT peptide derivatives were synthesised by Fmoc-based solid-phase peptide synthesis and binding to ex vivo mouse tibial cartilage evaluated by high-resolution micro-CT. Di-Iodotyrosinated Peptide Imaging of Cartilage (DIPIC) was performed ex vivo and in vivo 4, 8 and 12 weeks in mice after induction of OA by destabilisation of the medial meniscus (DMM). Finally, human osteochondral plugs were imaged ex vivo using DIPIC.

Results

Fifteen DIT peptides were synthesised and tested, yielding seven leads with varying cartilage binding strengths. DIPIC visualised ex vivo murine articular cartilage comparably to the ex vivo contrast agent phosphotungstic acid. Intra-articular injection of contrast agent followed by in vivo DIPIC enabled delineation of damaged murine articular cartilage. Finally, the translational potential of the contrast agent was confirmed by visualisation of ex vivo human cartilage explants.

Conclusion

DIPIC has reduction and refinement implications in OA animal research and potential clinical translation to imaging human disease.

Introduction

Plain X-ray radiography remains the gold standard for assessing cartilage damage in osteoarthritis (OA) [1]. However, it does not provide adequately sensitive disease assessment, as cartilage is a soft tissue and thus has poor X-ray absorption [1, 2]. Instead, progressive degradation of cartilage is inferred from the narrowing of space between diarthrodial joints [1]. As a consequence of this indirect measure of cartilage loss, radiography is most effective for the diagnosis of late-stage OA, once a significant proportion of cartilage has been degraded. Despite this, a considerable amount of research has focused on MRI techniques that assess the structural and biochemical composition of articular cartilage [3]. These methods can visualise early biochemical changes in cartilage degradation characterised by an increase in water content and decrease in negatively changed glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains of proteoglycans by focusing on changes in water content (e.g. T2 mapping) or sodium ions (e.g. sodium imaging) [3]. However, the sensitive quantitation of cartilage by MRI can be limited by spatial resolution [2, 3]. Even though this can be mitigated by MRI scanners with a higher magnetic strength, these are expensive, have limited clinical availability and are poorly tolerated by elderly patients [4].

On the other hand, X-ray computed tomography (CT) possesses a superior resolution to MRI and cartilage visualisation can be enhanced with contrast agents containing radiopaque elements [2]. A number of radiocontrast agents have been used to image articular cartilage, including small molecule iodinated [5, 6] and heavy metal-containing [711] contrast agents. The toxicity of heavy metals limits their use to ex vivo imaging. Iodinated small molecules are non-specific and rely on their charge to bind to or be excluded from the negatively charged cartilage matrix. For example, electrostatic repulsion by GAGs leads to the exclusion of negatively charged compounds such as ioxaglate or iothalamate from cartilage, resulting in poor delineation at the junction between cartilage and synovial fluid [12, 13]. The advent of positively charged iodinated small molecules such as CA4+ [5] has improved uptake in cartilage and contrast delineation relative to anionic contrast agents [1214]. However, these approaches are reliant on the fixed charge of aggrecan, which varies due to the dynamic physiological and pathological turnover of aggrecan GAGs in the OA joint [15, 16].

An alternative target for contrast agents is type II collagen in cartilage. Whilst aggrecan loss in cartilage is thought to be dynamic and reversible—as in disuse atrophy [17]—type II collagen damage is thought to be non-reversible and has direct structural and functional consequences for joint health [18]. Imaging type II collagen directly thus provides a potentially more accurate and stable picture of the disease state. We have previously shown that the type II collagen binding peptide WYRGRL [19], when conjugated to a macrocyclic DOTAM scaffold with a Cy5.5 fluorophore, successfully visualises articular cartilage ex vivo and in vivo by fluorescence imaging [20]. A more clinically relevant method to render this collagen-binding peptide radiopaque would enable the visualisation of long-term changes in articular cartilage by CT.

Herein we describe the development and validation of a radiopaque contrast agent for articular cartilage by combining a type II collagen binding peptide with the naturally occurring amino acid 3,5-diiodo-L-tyrosine (DIT) [21] using Fmoc-based solid-phase peptide synthesis (Fmoc-SPPS). We describe the generation of multiple DIT peptides based on WYRGRL, their application to ex vivo imaging of murine and human articular cartilage, as well as in vivo imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritic mice. To the best of our knowledge, this methodology, which we describe as Di-Iodotyrosinated Peptide Imaging of Cartilage (DIPIC), represents the first use of a collagen-targeted radiocontrast agent for monitoring osteoarthritis progression.

Methods

Synthesis of DIT peptide radiocontrast agents

Peptides were obtained through automated Fmoc-SPPS, purified by reverse-phase HPLC and characterised using HRMS and 1H-NMR. Further details and characterisation data can be found in the supporting information.

Animal study

All animal work was conducted with institutional ethical approval according to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 under the Home Office project licence PPL 30/3129. C57Bl/6 mice (male, 10 weeks) purchased from Charles River (Margate, UK) were housed in individually ventilated cages, maintained under a 12-hour light/dark cycle and were allowed food and water ad libitum according to UK Home Office regulations. Experimental details on DMM surgery can be found in the supplemental material.

Ex vivo imaging

Mice were sacrificed by inhalation of CO2, hind limbs collected, and tibiae finely dissected under a dissection microscope. Three tibiae per contrast agent were incubated to equilibrium in 20 mg iodine/ml and imaged by micro-CT (Quantum FX, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) at a resolution of 10 μm/pixel. To determine the half-life of each DIT peptide, tibiae were washed in saline and imaged upon 1 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h of clearing in fresh saline.

In vivo imaging

Mice were anaesthetised by inhalation of isoflurane and intra-articularly injected either with contrast agent in the right knee joint (20 μl, 20 mg iodine/ml) or saline (20 μl) in the left knee joint. Joints were immediately imaged by micro-CT at a spatial resolution of 10 μm/pixel (70 kV, 160 μA, 0.5 mm aluminium filter, 360° scan, 3 min acquisition time). Following imaging, animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. All scans were reconstructed to generate cross-sectional images using the manufacturer’s built-in software (version 2.3, PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and subsequently resliced for analysis using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), resulting in stacks of 512 isotropic voxel size images.

Human cartilage samples

Human tissue samples and data were collected with approval from the NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC 07/H0706/81). Written informed donor consent was obtained in full compliance with national and institutional ethical requirements, the UK Human Tissue Act, and the Declaration of Helsinki (HTA License 12217). Tibial plateaus of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty were collected and osteochondral plugs (5 mm) obtained using a biopsy punch. Plugs (n = 2) were incubated with contrast agent for 48 h and washed with saline for 120 h. Micro-CT imaging was performed at a spatial resolution of 10 μm/pixel at multiple time points to follow tissue uptake and washout of DIT peptides.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and members of the public were involved in several workshops run by the Centre for OA Pathogenesis to explore perceived clinical need, concept acceptability and study design.

Results

Design, synthesis and characterisation of DIT peptide radiocontrast agents

To minimise disruption to type II collagen binding, several strategies were used to introduce the DIT residue into WYRGRL (Fig 1A–1D). These involved the addition of DIT to the N-terminus of the peptide (Fig 1A) or utilised an integrated design, where direct replacement of Tyr was used to generate peptide sequences closely resembling WYRGRL without significantly changing its length or overall structure (Fig 1B). This latter design also replaced Arg for Lys to enhance water solubility. Furthermore, in order to reduce the potential impact of DIT on binding affinity when directly proximal to WYRGRL, the 8-amino-3,6-dioxaoctanoic acid (AEEA) linker was introduced at either the N- or C-terminus (Fig 1C and 1D, respectively). The addition of a glycine for the C-terminal design (Fig 1D) facilitated syntheses. Variations to these initial strategies involved combinations of integrated and C-terminal linker designs, as well as the introduction of one Lys residue for every DIT to offset the reduced solubility that DIT confers. The peptide WYRGRL was also validated as a targeting entity through injection of either scrambled control Ac-YRLGRW-DOTAM-Cy5.5 (Fig 1E) or targeting peptide Ac-WYRGRL-DOTAM-Cy5.5 (Fig 1F) into mice in vivo [20]. Subsequent histology revealed strong binding of the targeted probe to cartilage (Fig 1F) compared to the scrambled control (Fig 1E) [20]. All DIT peptide derivatives of WYRGRL were synthesised through automated Fmoc-SPPS, purified by reverse-phase HPLC (see S1 Fig in S1 File for chromatograms) and characterised by 1H-NMR spectroscopy (see S2 Fig in S1 File for spectra) and HRMS. Table 1 shows the synthesised DIT peptides and their purities.

Fig 1. Design of targeted peptide radiocontrast agents through the insertion of DIT into the WYRGRL hexamer.

Fig 1

Strategies include N-terminal placement of DIT (A), an integrated design (B) replacing Tyr with DIT (red) and containing Arg or Lys amino acids (circled), and an N/C-terminal PEG-based linker (AEEA, blue) approach to separate signalling (DIT) and targeting (WYRGRL) entities (C, D). Histology of ex vivo murine articular cartilage 24 h after intra-articular injection of Ac-YRLGRW-DOTAM-Cy5.5 (E) or Ac-WYRGRL-DOTAM-Cy5.5 (F) into mouse knee joints. Only targeted probe (F) showed binding to cartilage (Cy5.5, red) with the pericellular proteoglycan perlecan (Alexa Fluor 488, green) revealing the location of chondrocytes.

Table 1. Percentage purities of synthesised DIT peptides and their ex vivo binding half-lives to the cartilage of murine tibiae.

Entry Peptide Sequence % Purity[a] Half-life, h[b]
1 'Y'WYRGRL NA ND
2 'Y"Y'WYRGRL NA ND
3 W'Y'RGRL ≥ 98 NS
4 'Y'W'Y'RGRL ≥ 96 NS
5 W'Y'KGKL ≥ 99 2.60
6 'Y'W'Y'KGKL ≥ 97 NS
7 'Y'WGKKL ≥ 98 ND
8 K'Y'W'Y'KGKL[c] ≥ 99 33.86
9 K'Y'KW'Y'KGKL[c] ≥ 96 95.70
10 K'Y'K'Y'W'Y'KGKL[c] ≥ 97 298.00
11 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL ≥ 98 13.52
12 'Y"Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL ≥ 99 NS
13 WYKGKL-AEEA-'Y'G ≥ 99 4.95
14 W'Y'KGKL-AEEA-'Y'G ≥ 99 NS
15 K'Y'K'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL ≥ 99 93.80

'Y' = 3,5-diiodo-L-tyrosine.

[a] Purity was established by integration of the area under the curve for each HPLC chromatogram at all wavelengths.

[b] Murine tibiae were incubated with contrast agent, washed with saline and then imaged in saline until signal was no longer detected.

[c] These peptide sequences began to form viscous gels on dissolution, so this strategy was not pursued further. NA: only crude peptide tested. ND: no visible binding to cartilage by micro-CT. NS: crude peptide bound but was insoluble in 10% DMSO/water at ≥ 95% purity by HPLC at the minimum concentration of 2 mg iodine/ml required for radiocontrast detection.

Ex vivo binding of DIT peptide radiocontrast agents to murine articular cartilage

Initially, the concentration of iodine required for effective contrast delineation between cartilage, background saline and cortical bone was found to be 20 mg iodine/ml using the contrast agent diatrizoic acid (S3 Fig in S1 File). To screen multiple sequences rapidly, peptides were initially synthesised and tested without further purification. If binding to cartilage was observed, they were synthesised, purified by HPLC (≥ 95%) and re-tested to confirm the initial result. Freshly dissected murine tibiae were equilibrated with each DIT peptide (20 mg iodine/ml) and imaged by micro-CT. To determine the binding half-life, tibiae were washed with saline and imaged at regular time points until radiocontrast signal was no longer detected. The ex vivo half-life (t1/2) of each DIT peptide is displayed in Table 1, with the corresponding decay curves in S4A Fig in S1 File.

The addition of one or two N-terminal DIT residues to WYRGRL (Table 1, entries 1, 2) revealed no observable binding to cartilage during micro-CT imaging. An integrated design, placing DIT into the core of WYRGRL (3) was followed by the addition of a further DIT at the N-terminus (4). Despite both peptides binding at the crude level, the result could not be replicated with pure peptides due to poor solubility at 20 mg iodine/ml as well as 2 mg iodine/ml; the lowest concentration required for contrast generation (S3 Fig in S1 File). To improve solubility, both arginine residues in 3 and 4 were replaced with lysine to give 5 and 6, respectively. This delivered the first peptide with a measurable half-life (entry 5, Table 1, t1/2 = 2.60 h). The scrambled peptide 7 did not show binding, revealing the importance of sequence order for successful interaction with type II collagen in cartilage. Unfortunately, peptide 6 was insoluble in solution. For this reason, further N-terminal addition of DITs alone was abandoned. Instead, a lysine residue was introduced for every DIT to improve solubility, increase the number of positively charged side-chains and improve overall detection sensitivity by increasing the percentage iodine content within each sequence (entries 810, t1/2 = 33.86 h, 95.70 h and 298.00 h, respectively). These peptide sequences began to form viscous gels on dissolution, so this strategy was not pursued further.

In lieu of multiple lysine residues, the AEEA linker strategy was employed. The separation of WYRGRL from directly bound DITs was considered favourable for cartilage binding (entries 11–14). This was found to be the case for both N- and C-terminal addition; peptide 11 (t1/2 = 13.52 h) and 13 (t1/2 = 4.95 h), respectively. The addition of more than one DIT resulted in insoluble peptide sequences at purities ≥ 95% by HPLC (12, 14). However, this was negated by the addition of N-terminal lysine residues into 12 to give 15 (t1/2 = 93.80 h).

These results show that not only can targeted peptide radiocontrast agents be generated through insertion of DIT into WYRGRL, but their ex vivo half-life may also be tuned to suit a particular time window in CT imaging experiments. For example, the half-life obtained for 5 was 2.60 h, which was modulated to 298.00 h for 10 by the addition of two DIT and lysine residues apiece.

To explore alternative methods to tune the ex vivo half-life of DIT peptides, different concentrations of iodine were utilised for peptide 11 (S4B Fig in S1 File). At low concentrations (5 mg iodine/ml), a rapid washout time from cartilage was observed (t1/2 = 1.45 h). Increasing the concentration to 10 mg iodine/ml resulted in an approximately 8-fold increase in washout time (t1/2 = 11.40 h). However, at 20 mg iodine/ml, only an incremental 1.2-fold increase in washout time was observed (t1/2 = 13.52 h). At 35 mg iodine/ml, a similar washout time was observed to 20 mg iodine/ml (cf. t1/2 = 13.46 h to t1/2 = 13.52 h for 20 mg iodine/ml). This similarity in half-life presumably represents the saturation limit of articular cartilage; the ex vivo binding half-life can no longer increase as all cartilage binding sites of 11 are occupied. Therefore, 20 mg iodine/ml is also likely to be a good working concentration to maximise signal detection through saturation of cartilage binding.

The most successful DIT peptide insertion strategies involved integrated and 8-amino-3,6-dioxaoctanoic acid (AEEA) linker designs. Fig 2A shows representative ex vivo micro-CT coronal images of mouse tibiae incubated with peptides from these strategies (i.e. W'Y'KGKL, 5, 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL, 11 as well as the scrambled control for one of these sequences; 'Y'WGKKL, 7) upon 1 h and 24 h of washing in saline. Articular cartilage can be observed on both the medial and lateral tibial plateau of 5 and 11 after 1 h of washing (a time point in which unbound peptide has cleared from surrounding tissues apart from cartilage), but no cartilage is visible for 7. After 24 h, complete washout was observed for peptide 5, whereas for peptide 11 some binding could still be visualised (t1/2 = 13.52 h). The colour-coded maps of X-ray absorption (expressed in Hounsfield units, HU) of the lateral aspect of the tibial plateau for each peptide (expanded red box) highlight the difference in contrast between bone, cartilage, and saline, as well as the clearance of each peptide from cartilage.

Fig 2. Ex vivo imaging of healthy murine articular cartilage using DIPIC and other radiocontrast agents.

Fig 2

(A) Representative micro-CT coronal views of mouse tibiae incubated with W'Y'KGKL, 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL and 'Y'WGKKL upon 1 h and 24 h of washing in saline. The colour-coded maps of absorption (HU) for the lateral tibial plateau (red dotted box) highlight the loss of contrast enhancement as probes are cleared from cartilage over time. The dotted white lines delineate cartilage from bone. (B) Representative micro-CT coronal views of mouse tibiae after overnight incubation with iopamidol, 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL (both at 20 mg iodine/ml), and PTA (1% PTA in 70% ethanol). X-ray absorption profiles for each contrast agent were generated by drawing a line across cartilage from probe to bone. (C) X-ray fluorescence images for ex vivo murine articular cartilage after incubation with 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL showing calcium, phosphorous, sulphur and iodine channels (500 nm/pixel). (D) Elemental fluorescence profiles were generated by drawing a line down the middle of each image from (C).

Ex vivo micro-CT imaging of murine articular cartilage using DIPIC, phosphotungstic acid (PTA) and iopamidol

To validate the degree of contrast enhancement of murine articular cartilage by DIPIC, 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL was compared with pre-clinical (PTA) and clinical (iopamidol) radiocontrast agents (Fig 2B). A profile of tissue X-ray absorption showed that iopamidol exhibited poor contrast enhancement of cartilage, with a 0.8-fold difference (mean ± SEM) in absorption between cartilage and background (cf. 678 ± 29 HU to 875 ± 12 HU). In contrast, DIPIC revealed a 7.2-fold difference in absorption between cartilage and background (cf. 690 ± 103 HU to 96 ± 17 HU), clearly delineating cartilage from the surrounding solution. A higher (10.7-fold) contrast difference between cartilage and background was observed using PTA (cf. 3657 ± 253 HU to 342 ± 64 HU). Both DIPIC and PTA assessed the thickness of cartilage similarly (cf. 100 μm to 110 μm), while iopamidol gave a lower value of 70 μm, indicating a lower detection sensitivity compared to DIPIC at 20 mg iodine/ml. DIPIC thus provides similar delineation between cartilage and background to PTA and is approximately ten times better than iopamidol, a clinically approved radiocontrast agent.

We tested the ability of DIPIC to detect lesions in murine articular cartilage by puncturing the articular surface of tibiae using needles with different outer diameters (O.D.) (S5 Fig in S1 File). The resulting damage (indicated by red arrows) ranged from small clefts (O.D. of 184.2 μm), to focal cartilage loss (O.D. of 412.8 μm), to extensive abrasion of the surface (O.D. of 514.4 μm). Remarkably, DIPIC was able to visualise the presence of these increasingly larger lesions whilst also imaging articular cartilage in an undamaged sample. To verify the depth of penetration of DIT peptides into articular cartilage, 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL was incubated with murine articular cartilage and subjected to X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. Elemental analysis of calcium and phosphorous revealed the mineral bone, sulphur the proteoglycans in cartilage, and iodine the DIT peptide (Fig 2C). In the iodine channel, 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL was found to surround the chondrocytes in the pericellular matrix near the deep zone of articular cartilage. The relative abundance of each element is shown in Fig 2D.

Ex vivo micro-CT imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritic mice using DIPIC and validation using PTA-CT

The ability of DIPIC to track and quantify progressive articular cartilage degradation was tested using a surgical model of murine osteoarthritis involving destabilisation of the medial meniscus (DMM) [22]. Tibia dissected from DMM mice were incubated with 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL at different time points following disease induction and DIPIC visualised gradual cartilage degradation during disease progression (Fig 3A). DIPIC further presented sufficient contrast to automatically delineate cartilage from bone (S6A and S6B Fig in S1 File), enabling assessment of disease progression across the entire tibial surface. Cartilage thinning was evident in the medial tibial plateau of operated mice and was detected by DIPIC at time points in which disease was already well established (Fig 3B), with histopathology confirming the presence of osteoarthritic lesions in cartilage (Fig 3A, far right panel). Manual segmentation of articular cartilage in histological sections and subsequent quantification of thickness revealed a clear correlation between cartilage thickness assessed by histology and that determined by DIPIC and PTA-CT (Fig 3C and 3D). The former showed a high (r = 0.61) and significant (p = 0.0002) correlation with histology (Fig 3C). Measurements in 3D for DIPIC and PTA-CT were then obtained by approaches based on automated segmentation and mapping of volumes-of-interest (VOIs). A comparison between both indicated that they were significantly correlated (S6C Fig in S1 File) and in good agreement (S6D and S6E Fig in S1 File). Compared to PTA-CT, DIPIC quantifications appeared to underestimate cartilage thickness by 7.1 μm (S6E Fig in S1 File) an amount below the resolution limit of micro-CT (10 μm/pixel). Furthermore, the medial and lateral cartilage thickness of DMM-operated tibiae was assessed by DIPIC and compared to OARSI histopathological scoring (S6F and S6G Fig in S1 File). A clear negative correlation was observed between medial cartilage thickness and OARSI scoring (p = 0.0002), but not for lateral cartilage. Thus, higher scores on the medial side of tibiae were associated with thinner cartilage.

Fig 3. Ex vivo and in vivo imaging of murine osteoarthritis using DIPIC.

Fig 3

(A) Representative micro-CT coronal views of contralateral tibia (negative control) and operated tibiae at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post-surgery imaged using DIPIC and subsequently PTA-CT. Despite PTA-CT providing higher contrast enhancement of cartilage than DIPIC (see colour-coded maps of absorption), both methods revealed the progressive degradation of this tissue in the medial tibial plateau (dotted red boxes). Dotted white lines delineate cartilage from bone. The presence of lesions in DMM mice was validated by histopathology (haematoxylin & eosin and safranin-O staining in the far-right panel). (B) Average articular cartilage thickness in DMM-operated and contralateral tibiae in weeks post-DMM surgery. Mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, obtained by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-test for differences between 2 weeks vs. subsequent time points in the medial DMM tibial plateau and #p < 0.05 for the same test in the medial contralateral tibial plateau. Parametric correlations between articular cartilage thickness measurements obtained from histological sections and by DIPIC (C) (n = 32) and PTA-CT (D) (n = 17); Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and p-values are indicated in the graph. (E) Representative micro-CT coronal views of DMM mouse knee joints and corresponding colour-coded maps of absorption of the medial aspect of the joint after injection of either 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL or saline into the synovial space. Progressive cartilage degradation is highlighted by DIPIC, but not by saline, owing to the loss of contrast enhancement.

In vivo micro-CT imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritic mice using DIPIC

To test prospective monitoring of cartilage loss, an intra-articular injection of 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL was given to a group of mice every week up to 12 weeks after disease induction and was rapidly followed by in vivo imaging of the knee joint (Fig 3E). A saline injection into the contralateral knee acted as a negative control and animals were rightly sacrificed upon imaging. Articular cartilage can clearly be evinced in knees containing DIT peptide, whereas no cartilage is observed in the knee where saline was injected; the colour-coded maps of absorption of the medial aspect of the joint (red dashed boxes) confirm these observations. At early timepoints after disease induction (two weeks post-DMM), undamaged cartilage is visualised by DIPIC at the margins of bone. However, at 8-weeks post-DMM cartilage is seen to be thinning in the load-bearing area. This is further enhanced at 12 weeks post-DMM, an observation which is consistent with ex vivo quantitation (Fig 3B). The negative control confirms that saline solution does not result in cartilage visualisation. DIPIC with 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL may thus be used to visualise articular cartilage in mice in vivo.

Ex vivo micro-CT imaging of human articular cartilage using DIPIC

Human osteochondral plugs were immersed in 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL and imaged by micro-CT throughout incubation. A gradual diffusion of peptide was observed into the plug over time (Fig 4A, upper row). However, the deeper zones of cartilage had lower uptake of peptide (Fig 4A, lower row) and thus lower X-ray absorption (Fig 4B). The bound peptide was washed out with saline solution up to 120 h (Fig 4C, upper row). Colour-coded maps of absorption (Fig 4C, lower row) and profiles generated across the sample (Fig 4D) showed that peptide remained in the tissue five days after saline washing. At this time point, greater uptake was observed in the deeper zones with more uniform distribution throughout cartilage. A 3D reconstruction of the osteochondral plug revealed that articular cartilage and underlying bone could be clearly visualised using this probe (Fig 4E). These results demonstrate that DIPIC can be successfully used for ex vivo 3D imaging of articular cartilage from human biopsies.

Fig 4. Ex vivo imaging of human articular cartilage with the DIT peptide 'Y'-AEEA-WYKGKL.

Fig 4

(A) Representative micro-CT views of a human osteochondral plug at different time points upon incubation with probe and corresponding colour-coded maps of absorption. (B) X-ray absorption profiles (dashed coloured lines in micro-CT images) obtained to evaluate probe penetration into tissue over time. (C) Representative micro-CT views of the same osteochondral plug at different time points upon washing in saline and corresponding colour-coded maps of absorption. (D) X-ray absorption profiles (dashed coloured lines in micro-CT images) obtained to evaluate probe washing from tissue over time. (E) Representative views of a 3D reconstruction of the osteochondral plug showing articular cartilage imaged by the DIT peptide (green) and underlying subchondral bone.

Discussion

In this paper, we describe the development of targeted peptide radiocontrast agents to monitor articular cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis. We validated this ex vivo in murine and human articular cartilage as well as in vivo in osteoarthritic mice. Ex vivo, DIPIC demonstrated a ten-fold improvement in contrast enhancement compared with the clinical contrast agent iopamidol, and enhancement correlated well with data obtained using PTA, a toxic ex vivo contrast agent. In addition, human cartilage was also readily visualised. In vivo, DIPIC was able to visualise articular cartilage damage in OA mice following intra-articular injection. The sensitivity of this as an imaging tool was demonstrated by showing a good correlation between DIPIC signal and histological cartilage grade in OA mice, and by showing that small superficial defects (induced by scarification of the cartilage) could also be picked up by this agent.

Compared with the half-life of aggrecan in articular cartilage (3.4 years) [23], type II collagen has a half-life of 117 years [24], making it a more stable imaging target for longitudinal OA studies. We refined the type II collagen binding peptide WYRGRL [19] with respect to cartilage binding by inserting DIT through several strategies, thereby generating probes with a range of washout half-lives from ex vivo murine tissue. We did not observe adverse events during the study, although the in vivo studies were short (< 10 min) and performed under terminal anaesthesia. As DIT is a naturally occurring amino acid [21], its use in DIPIC is unlikely to have direct toxic effects when compared with a heavy metal. Nonetheless, future prospective in vivo studies will require a detailed examination of cellular toxicity.

Our study shows that DIPIC has potential value as a pre-clinical monitoring tool. Murine OA induced by DMM replicates many features of the human condition, including slow progressive cartilage degradation, bone remodelling, modest synovitis and late onset pain behaviour [22, 2527]. Our standard histological processing involves serial sectioning through the entire depth of the joint with double-blind scoring performed on at least eight stained sections per animal at a minimum of two time points after surgery. An in vivo tool to monitor structural disease progression in mice would save significant time and money and provide a clearer understanding of the stages of disease progression. It could also be used to select the most appropriate time for termination of experiments as well as monitor treatment responses and dose finding. Taken together, these benefits would have significant impact on the reduction of mouse numbers in OA research in line with the ARRIVE guidelines [28] and be more relevant for human clinical use. Our in vivo data will require further refinement to deliver the benefits above. This could include increasing the signal from the collagen binding peptide, improving the distribution of contrast agent following injection and/or improving image registration in live animals.

Whilst our study was largely focused on developing an in vivo imaging tool to support pre-clinical OA research, our findings also have potential application to human disease monitoring. There is a pressing need to develop diagnostic, prognostic and theragnostic radiographic biomarkers that are more sensitive than standard X-ray. A number of contrast agents have been tested experimentally in human studies. These are largely MRI-based due to the superior safety of MRI over CT [2]. MRI-based cartilage imaging has largely utilised contrast media targeting the fixed charge density of aggrecan such as delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) [29, 30] or through sodium imaging [31, 32]. Multimodal techniques incorporating MRI with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) are also being explored [33, 34]. However, despite MRI having a superior safety profile, it is expensive, suffers from long acquisition times and is frequently not tolerated by patients due to its claustrophobic nature [2].

We recognise a number of limitations in our study. Firstly, the WYRGRL binding site on type II collagen is not fully characterised, and we are unclear whether binding (and therefore signal) would be affected by post-translational changes in type II collagen that occur with age and disease e.g. through cross-linking or damage due to reactive oxygen species [35]. Nor do we know whether the accessibility of the binding site would be affected by changes in other matrix proteins such as loss of aggrecan following proteolytic degradation. Secondly, collagen itself binds to cell surface integrins and is able to activate intracellular signalling in chondrocytes through discoidin domain receptors (DDRs) [36]. Whether the WYRGRL peptide interferes with the generation of native triple helical fragments or blocks binding at the receptor, is unknown. Although it is unlikely that WYRGRL would activate DDRs directly, as it does not have a triple helical structure. Finally, our study was limited by the resolution of our micro-CT scanner (10 μm/pixel) as this scanner is primarily designed for in vivo use.

Conclusions

To conclude, we have developed a novel and versatile system for labelling specific extracellular matrix proteins in vivo. For disease monitoring, DIPIC could be used alone or in conjunction with other imaging modalities such as PET. Its immediate use may be in pre-clinical studies to improve the time and cost associated with tissue processing, but it also possesses potential as a clinical radiographic biomarker, supporting clinical studies and ultimately assisting in the clinical management of patients.

Supporting information

S1 File

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the HRMS laboratory in the ORCRB for use of their accurate-mass Q-TOF LC-MS and Diamond Light Source for the provision of beamtime at I14 (CM22977-3).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3R grant NC/M000141/1, NHL, https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/) and the Centre for OA Pathogenesis Versus Arthritis (Versus Arthritis grants 20205, 21621, https://www.versusarthritis.org/). The human tissue work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) via the Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Roemer FW, Eckstein F, Hayashi D, Guermazi A. The role of imaging in osteoarthritis. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology. 2014;28(1):31–60. Epub 2014/05/06. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.02.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.James ML, Gambhir SS. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiological Reviews. 2012;92(2):897–965. Epub 2012/04/27. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guermazi A, Alizai H, Crema MD, Trattnig S, Regatte RR, Roemer FW. Compositional MRI techniques for evaluation of cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(10):1639–53. Epub 2015/06/09. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.026 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Eggenberger E, Hildebrand G, Vang S, Ly A, Ward C. Use of CT Vs. MRI for Diagnosis of Hip or Pelvic Fractures in Elderly Patients After Low Energy Trauma. Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):179–83. Epub 2019/08/16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Joshi NS, Bansal PN, Stewart RC, Snyder BD, Grinstaff MW. Effect of contrast agent charge on visualization of articular cartilage using computed tomography: exploiting electrostatic interactions for improved sensitivity. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(37):13234–5. Epub 2009/09/17. doi: 10.1021/ja9053306 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Myller KAH, Turunen MJ, Honkanen JT, Vaananen SP, Iivarinen JT, Salo J, et al. In Vivo Contrast-Enhanced Cone Beam CT Provides Quantitative Information on Articular Cartilage and Subchondral Bone. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(3):811–8. Epub 2016/09/21. doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1730-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Das Neves Borges P, Forte AE, Vincent TL, Dini D, Marenzana M. Rapid, automated imaging of mouse articular cartilage by microCT for early detection of osteoarthritis and finite element modelling of joint mechanics. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2014;22(10):1419–28. Epub 2014/10/04. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nieminen HJ, Ylitalo T, Karhula S, Suuronen JP, Kauppinen S, Serimaa R, et al. Determining collagen distribution in articular cartilage using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2015;23(9):1613–21. Epub 2015/05/25. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Karhula SS, Finnila MA, Lammi MJ, Ylarinne JH, Kauppinen S, Rieppo L, et al. Effects of Articular Cartilage Constituents on Phosphotungstic Acid Enhanced Micro-Computed Tomography. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0171075. Epub 2017/01/31. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clark JN, Garbout A, Ferreira SA, Javaheri B, Pitsillides AA, Rankin SM, et al. Propagation phase-contrast micro-computed tomography allows laboratory-based three-dimensional imaging of articular cartilage down to the cellular level. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2020;28(1):102–11. Epub 2019/11/05. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.10.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Freedman JD, Lusic H, Snyder BD, Grinstaff MW. Tantalum Oxide Nanoparticles for the Imaging of Articular Cartilage Using X-Ray Computed Tomography: Visualization of Ex Vivo/In Vivo Murine Tibia and Ex Vivo Human Index Finger Cartilage. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2014;53(32):8406–10. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bansal PN, Stewart RC, Entezari V, Snyder BD, Grinstaff MW. Contrast agent electrostatic attraction rather than repulsion to glycosaminoglycans affords a greater contrast uptake ratio and improved quantitative CT imaging in cartilage. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2011;19(8):970–6. Epub 2011/05/10. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.04.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stewart RC, Bansal PN, Entezari V, Lusic H, Nazarian RM, Snyder BD, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT with a high-affinity cationic contrast agent for imaging ex vivo bovine, intact ex vivo rabbit, and in vivo rabbit cartilage. Radiology. 2013;266(1):141–50. Epub 2012/11/30. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bansal PN, Joshi NS, Entezari V, Malone BC, Stewart RC, Snyder BD, et al. Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(5):704–9. Epub 2011/03/26. doi: 10.1002/jor.21312 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Loeser RF, Collins JA, Diekman BO. Ageing and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2016;12(7):412–20. Epub 2016/05/20. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vincent TL, Wann AKT. Mechanoadaptation: articular cartilage through thick and thin. J Physiol. 2019;597(5):1271–81. Epub 2018/06/20. doi: 10.1113/JP275451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Palmoski M, Perricone E, Brandt KD. Development and reversal of a proteoglycan aggregation defect in normal canine knee cartilage after immobilization. Arthritis Rheum. 1979;22(5):508–17. Epub 1979/05/01. doi: 10.1002/art.1780220511 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pratta MA, Yao WQ, Decicco C, Tortorella MD, Liu RQ, Copeland RA, et al. Aggrecan protects cartilage collagen from proteolytic cleavage. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(46):45539–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303737200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rothenfluh DA, Bermudez H, O’Neil CP, Hubbell JA. Biofunctional polymer nanoparticles for intra-articular targeting and retention in cartilage. Nature Materials. 2008;7(3):248–54. Epub 2008/02/05. doi: 10.1038/nmat2116 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu HY, Lim NH, Ding-Pfennigdorff D, Saas J, Wendt KU, Ritzeler O, et al. DOTAM derivatives as active cartilage-targeting drug carriers for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2015;26(3):383–8. Epub 2015/01/30. doi: 10.1021/bc500557s . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruf J, Carayon P. Structural and functional aspects of thyroid peroxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006;445(2):269–77. Epub 2005/08/16. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.06.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Glasson SS, Blanchet TJ, Morris EA. The surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model of osteoarthritis in the 129/SvEv mouse. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2007;15(9):1061–9. Epub 2007/05/02. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maroudas A, Bayliss MT, Uchitel-Kaushansky N, Schneiderman R, Gilav E. Aggrecan turnover in human articular cartilage: use of aspartic acid racemization as a marker of molecular age. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;350(1):61–71. Epub 1998/02/19. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1997.0492 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Verzijl N, DeGroot J, Thorpe SR, Bank RA, Shaw JN, Lyons TJ, et al. Effect of collagen turnover on the accumulation of advanced glycation end products. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(50):39027–31. Epub 2000/09/08. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006700200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Culley KL, Dragomir CL, Chang J, Wondimu EB, Coico J, Plumb DA, et al. Mouse models of osteoarthritis: surgical model of posttraumatic osteoarthritis induced by destabilization of the medial meniscus. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1226:143–73. Epub 2014/10/22. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1619-1_12 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Das Neves Borges P, Vincent TL, Marenzana M. Automated assessment of bone changes in cross-sectional micro-CT studies of murine experimental osteoarthritis. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174294. Epub 2017/03/24. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Inglis JJ, McNamee KE, Chia SL, Essex D, Feldmann M, Williams RO, et al. Regulation of pain sensitivity in experimental osteoarthritis by the endogenous peripheral opioid system. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(10):3110–9. Epub 2008/09/30. doi: 10.1002/art.23870 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2012;20(4):256–60. Epub 2012/03/20. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.d’Entremont AG, McCormack RG, Agbanlog K, Horlick SG, Stone TB, Manzary MM, et al. Cartilage health in high tibial osteotomy using dGEMRIC: Relationships with joint kinematics. Knee. 2015;22(3):156–62. Epub 2015/02/27. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tjornstrand J, Neuman P, Svensson J, Lundin B, Dahlberg LE, Tiderius CJ. Osteoarthritis development related to cartilage quality-the prognostic value of dGEMRIC after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2019;27(11):1647–52. Epub 2019/07/08. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Madelin G, Babb J, Xia D, Chang G, Krasnokutsky S, Abramson SB, et al. Articular cartilage: evaluation with fluid-suppressed 7.0-T sodium MR imaging in subjects with and subjects without osteoarthritis. Radiology. 2013;268(2):481–91. Epub 2013/03/08. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zbyn S, Brix MO, Juras V, Domayer SE, Walzer SM, Mlynarik V, et al. Sodium magnetic resonance imaging of ankle joint in cadaver specimens, volunteers, and patients after different cartilage repair techniques at 7 T: initial results. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(4):246–54. Epub 2014/12/02. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Savic D, Pedoia V, Seo Y, Yang J, Bucknor M, Franc BL, et al. Imaging Bone-Cartilage Interactions in Osteoarthritis Using [(18)F]-NaF PET-MRI. Mol Imaging. 2016;15:1–12. Epub 2016/01/01. doi: 10.1177/1536012116683597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tibrewala R, Bahroos E, Mehrabian H, Foreman SC, Link TM, Pedoia V, et al. [(18) F]-Sodium Fluoride PET/MR Imaging for Bone-Cartilage Interactions in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Feasibility Study. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(12):2671–80. Epub 2019/08/20. doi: 10.1002/jor.24443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lim NH, Vincent TL, Nissim A. In vivo optical imaging of early osteoarthritis using an antibody specific to damaged arthritic cartilage. Arthritis research & therapy. 2015;17(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0898-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu H, Raynal N, Stathopoulos S, Myllyharju J, Farndale RW, Leitinger B. Collagen binding specificity of the discoidin domain receptors: binding sites on collagens II and III and molecular determinants for collagen IV recognition by DDR1. Matrix Biol. 2011;30(1):16–26. Epub 2010/11/04. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES