Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2022 May 8;17(1):2068834. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2022.2068834

The cultivable endophytic fungal community of Scutellaria baicalensis: diversity and relevance to flavonoid production by the host

Xiao-Xuan Cui a,b, Lei Wang a,b, Hui-Yong Fang a,b, Yu-Guang Zheng a,b,c,, Chun-Yan Su a,b,
PMCID: PMC9090296  PMID: 35531979

ABSTRACT

Scutellaria baicalensis (SB), a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, is widely used because of its important pharmacological activities. However, the endophytic fungi that promote flavonoid accumulation in SB remain unclear. Therefore, we analyzed the endophytic fungal community of SB and screened the endophytic fungi that might promote flavonoid synthesis in SB. ITS1/ITS4Blast was used to identify the endophytic fungi in SB. In total, 687 strains were identified in 57 genera. The dominant genus in the leaves and stems was Alternaria and that in the roots was Fusarium. Alternaria was the dominant genus in SB collected from all sites and in wild and cultivated SB. Alpha diversity indexes indicated more abundant endophytic fungi in samples from Chengde, the genuine producing area of SB, than in those from other sites. Beta diversity index analysis indicated that SB plants with closer geographical relationships showed more similar endophytic fungal community profiles. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that baicalin, wogonoside, wogonin, and oroxylin A contents were significantly correlated with the relative abundance of Alternaria. Overall, the results indicate the importance of geographical factors in influencing the endophytic fungal community of SB and suggest that the presence of Alternaria spp. might contribute to flavonoid synthesis in SB.

KEYWORDS: Scutellaria baicalensis, endophytic fungi, community composition, diversity analysis, Alternaria, flavonoids

Introduction

Scutellaria baicalensis (SB), a perennial plant of the Lamiaceae family, is widely grown in the northern part of China, whereas Chengde in Hebei Province is its genuine producing area. The root of SB, named as “huangqin” in China, is one of the most important traditional Chinese medicines. Clinically, SB roots are used to treat pneumonia, hypertension, jaundice, dysentery, intestinal catarrh, and pyogenic infection.1 In particular, baicalein and wogonin, the main bioactive compounds in SB, were also found to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication and to block the virus-binding sites.2–5 The leaves and stems of SB can improve memory impairments, neuronal injuries,6 and cognitive function, and delay the progression of dementia.7 Flavonoids and their derivatives, including baicalin, baicalein, wogonoside, wogonin, and oroxylin A, are the main bioactive components of SB.1

Endophytic fungi are considered as microorganisms that live inside cells or in the intercellular spaces of a plant during a certain life stage or throughout their life cycle, without showing any symptoms of disease.8 They are widely distributed among medicinal plants. The endophytic fungal community of a plant is influenced by its tissues, geographical locations, and growth conditions (wild or cultivated).9–11 Studies on the diversity and community composition of endophytic fungi in a given plant species may indicate that they provide ecological benefits to plants. This is particularly true when the host plants grow in different habitats. Moreover, endophytic fungi also promote the production of secondary metabolites in host plants by stimulating the key genes in their biosynthesis pathways,12,13 or by synthesizing enzymes that can transform precursors to active compounds or their analogs.14 Therefore, screening phytobeneficial endophytic fungi has become an important means of promoting the synthesis of bioactive metabolites.

In recent decades, owing to the scarcity of wild plant resources, cultivated SB has been used in clinical practice. Therefore, studying the endophytic fungal community of SB and screening endophytic fungi that can promote the accumulation of flavonoids in SB may positively influence improvement in the quality of cultivated SB. However, the endophytic fungi that promote flavonoid accumulation in SB remain unclear. Therefore, this study focused on the endophytic fungal community composition of wild and cultivated SB and the correlation between the endophytic fungal community and flavonoid content to screen endophytic fungi that might promote flavonoid synthesis in SB.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Healthy wild and cultivated SB samples were collected from five sampling sites in Hebei Province, China (Table 1). All samples were stored in ice boxes and immediately sent to the laboratory for further analysis. The samples were then separated into two parts. One part was used to determine the flavonoid content, and the other part was used for endophytic fungal isolation.

Table 1.

Sample information of Scutellaria baicalensis.

Code No. Location Growth Type Growth time Sampling site,altitude Number
CLY Chongli county, Wild Unknown 115°25′44.39″E, 41°02′30.76″N,1382 m 25
Zhangjiakou city
CDY Chengde county, Wild Unknown 118°14′50.32″E, 41°01′39.50″N, 60 m 18
Chengde city
LHY Longhua county, Wild Unknown 117°27′29.16″E, 41°20′09.24″N, 971 m 24
Chengde city
LHZ Longhua county, Artificial cultivation 3 years 117°27′38.88″E, 41°19′48″N, 943 m 12
Chengde city
WDZ Wangdu county, Artificial cultivation 2 years 115°08′52.79″E, 38°44′57.22″N, 44 m 31

Isolation of endophytic fungi

Fresh SB samples were rinsed thoroughly with running water for 10 min; the roots, stems, and leaves were then cut into 5 mm × 5 mm pieces. For each section, six tissue segments were randomly selected for removal of surface microbes. All the tissues underwent the following surface sterilization steps: soaking in sterile water for 1 min followed by 75% ethanol for 1 min. The leaves were then soaked in 3.5% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, and the roots and stems were soaked for 3 min. Further, all tissues were soaked in 75% ethanol for 1 min and rinsed with sterile water for 1 min. Finally, the surface water was removed using sterilized filter paper, and fresh cuts were made using a sterilized scalpel. Sets of three segments were then evenly placed on a 90 mm Petri dish containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. The plates were incubated at a constant temperature of 26°C for 5–7 days. The fungal colonies were transferred to fresh PDA media for purification. Purified fungi were kept in 15% glycerin and store at −80°C for further identification.

Identification of endophytic fungi

The Fungi Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) was used to extract genomic DNA from endophytic fungi, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. From the extracted DNA, 18S rDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′). PCR was performed in a 30 μL mixture containing 15 μL of 2× Taq PCR Mix (Generay Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai., China.), 1.0 μL of each primer (1.0 μM), 1 μL of template DNA, and 12 μL of ddH2O.

The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 37 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30s, annealing at 55°C for 40s, and extension at 72°C for 30s. Finally the reaction mixture was maintained at 72°C for 7 min. The resulting PCR products were sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Each sequence was used as a query sequence to search for similar sequences using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) in GenBank.

Extraction and quantification of flavonoids from SB

SB samples were dried at 50°C to a constant weight. The dried samples (leaves, stems, and roots) were comminuted and passed through 60-mesh sieves. Accurately weighed (18.75 mg) sample powders were extracted using 1.5 mL of 60% ethanol by ultrasonication for 40 min and then centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was then collected. The sample solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm pore-size polytetrafluoroethylene filter.

The extracts were analyzed on a Diamonsil C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, 5.0 µm, DiKMA, Beijing, China) column connected to a SHIMADZU LC-20AD high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan). The mobile phases comprised A (water containing 0.1% formic acid) and B (acetonitrile). The gradient elution program was as follows: 25% B at 0–10 min, 25–45% B at 10–30 min, 45–55% B at 30–55 min. The detection wavelength was set at 254 nm. The sample injection volume was 10 μL and the column temperature was maintained at 25°C.

Data analysis

Alpha diversity, including the Shannon index, Simpson index, abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE), and Chao1 index; and beta diversity, including principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA), were determined using QIIME and displayed using R software. The contents of flavonoids were expressed as mean±SD from three separate observations. The data analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Duncan’s multiple range tests using the SPSS19.0 software. Endophytic fungi with relative abundance higher than 5% and which were found in common for at least 3 sites, were chosen for further correlation analysis. Spearman correlation analysis between the relative abundance of endophytic fungi and flavonoid content in SB was performed using Origin 2021.

Results

Fungal community composition

Fungal community composition in different organs of SB

In total, 687 endophytic fungal strains were isolated from 1980 tissue segments. The highest number of strains was found in the roots (261), followed by the leaves (230) and stems (196). According to ITS sequence analysis, the fungal strains belonged to 57 genera. As depicted in Figure 1a, 32 genera were found in the stems, followed by the roots (31) and leaves (23). Nine genera were common to all three organs, whereas 13, 11, and 8 genera were specific to the roots, stems and leaves, respectively (Additional Table S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The endophytic fungal community composition in organs of SB at the genus level. (a) Venn diagram of different organs of SB. The numbers inside the diagram indicate the number of genera. (b) The relative abundance of endophytic fungi in different organs of SB; endophytic fungi with relative abundances lower than 5% are indicated as “Others”.

As demonstrated in Figure 1b, Alternaria was dominant in all leaves, with a relative abundance ranging from 27.4% (CDY) to 100% (CLY). Similarly, Alternaria was dominant in all stems, with a relative abundance ranging from 29.1% (CDY) to 83.3% (CLY). However, in the roots, Fusarium was dominant in CLY, LHY, LHZ, and CDY, with the relative abundances ranging from 27.4% (CDY) to 55.5% (CLY), whereas Alternaria was dominant in WDZ, with a relative abundance of 31.25%.

Fungal community composition in SB from different sampling sites

The highest number of strains was obtained from LHY (269), followed by CDY (150), LHZ (121), CLY (82), and WDZ (65). According to ITS sequence analysis, 37 genera were found in LHY, followed by CDY (35 genera), LHZ (21 genera), CLY (11 genera), and WDZ (7 genera). As depicted in Figure 2a, two genera (Alternaria, Fusarium) were commonly found at all five sampling sites; further, 3, 3, 12, 3, and 8 genera were specific to CLY, WDZ, LHY, LHZ, and CDY, respectively (Additional Table S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The endophytic fungal community composition of SB from different sampling sites, at the genus level. (a) Venn diagram of the endophytic fungi of SB from different sampling sites. The numbers in the diagram indicate the number of genera. (b) The relative abundance of endophytic fungi of SB from different sites; the endophytic fungi with relative abundances lower than 5% are indicated as “Others”.

As shown in Figure 2b, Alternaria was dominant at all sampling sites, with a relative abundance ranging from 20.6% (CDY) to 75.3% (WDZ).

Fungal community composition of wild and cultivated SB

In total, 501 endophytic fungal strains were obtained from wild SB, whereas 186 strains were obtained from cultivated SB. As depicted in Figure 3a, according to ITS sequence analysis, endophytic fungi obtained from wild SB were assigned to 51 genera, and endophytic fungi obtained from cultivated SB were assigned to 25 genera. 19 genera were common between wild and cultivated SB, whereas 32 and 6 genera were specific to wild SB and cultivated SB, respectively (Additional Table S3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Endophytic fungal community composition of wild and cultivated SB, at the genus level. (a) Venn diagram of endophytic fungi in wild and cultivated SB. The numbers inside the diagram indicate the number of genera. (b) The relative abundance of endophytic fungi in wild and cultivated SB; endophytic fungi with relative abundances lower than 5% are indicated as “Others”.

As shown in Figure 3b, the dominant genera in wild and cultivated SB were all Alternaria, with relative abundances of 29.7% and 49.4%, respectively.

Diversity analysis

Alpha diversity analysis

The alpha diversity indices of SB from five sampling sites are listed in Table 2. The highest Shannon, Chao1, ACE, and the lowest Simpson indices were found in CDY, indicating a higher diversity of endophytic fungi in CDY. In contrast, the lowest Shannon, Chao1, and ACE, and the highest Simpson indices were found in WDZ, indicating a low diversity of endophytic fungi in WDZ.

Table 2.

Alpha diversity indices of SB samples

Sample Name Shannon Simpson Chao1 ACE
CLY 1.51 0.29 26 29.85
CDY 2.81 0.093 57.66 75.92
LHY 2.56 0.14 48.66 67.01
LHZ 2.18 0.18 24 26.53
WDZ 0.93 0.57 8.5 10.6

Beta diversity analysis

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Binary Jaccard was conducted to determine the relationship between different samples of SB (Figure 4a). The results showed that the first axis explained 46.30% of the data variability and the second axis explained 30.14%. The distance between CDY and LHY was the smallest, whereas the WDZ sample had the largest distance from the other samples. The unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) was used to cluster the five samples based on the binary Jaccard (Figure 4b). The results revealed that CDY and LHY were clustered together, whereas WDZ had the largest difference compared with other samples in terms of fungal diversity, similar to the results of the PcoA.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Principal coordinate analysis (PcoA) analysis and the Unweighted pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) of the Binary jaccard algorithm at the genus level. (a) PcoA analysis (b) UPGMA hierarchical cluster analysis.

The contents of five flavonoids in SB

The flavonoid contents of SB are shown in Figure 5. The contents of baicalin, baicalein, wogonoside, wogonin, and oroxylin A in the roots were higher than those in the leaves and stems from all sampling sites. The contents of baicalin and wogonoside in the leaves from CLY and CDY were significantly higher than those in the stems (P < .05), whereas those in the stems from LHY and WDZ were significantly higher than those in the leaves. However, the baicalin and wogonoside contents in the leaves and stems of LHZ were slightly different. The contents of baicalein and oroxylin A in stems from CLY were significantly higher than those in leaves, whereas those in leaves from LHY and LHZ were significantly higher than those in stems. However, the contents of baicalein and oroxylin A in the leaves and stems from WDZ were not different. The content of wogonin in the stems of LHY was higher than that in the leaves; however, the content of wogonin in leaves and stems from other sampling sites was not different.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Contents of flavonoids in SB. (a–e) represent baicalin, baicalein, wogonoside, wogonin, and oroxylin A, respectively.

Based on our results, the highest content of total flavonoids in the roots of SB was found in WDZ (244.01 mg/g), followed by CLY (193.72 mg/g), LHZ (175.59 mg/g), LHY (160.75 mg/g), and CDY (116.94 mg/g).

Means within the same column with different letter marks among content level groups are significantly different

Correlation analysis between the endophytic fungi and metabolites in SB

To screen for potential endophytic fungi that can promote flavonoid biosynthesis in SB. Spearman analysis was used to determine the correlation between the relative abundance of endophytic fungi and the flavonoid content in SB (Figure 6). The results showed no significant correlation between the dominant endophytic fungal genus and flavonoids (A) in the leaves. Interestingly, in stems, the contents of wogonin (P < .05) and oroxylin A (P < .01) showed a significant positive correlation with the relative abundance of Alternaria, whereas the oroxylin A content showed a significantly negative correlation with the relative abundance of Diaporthe and Phomopsis (P < .01). Furthermore, in the roots, the contents of baicalin and wogonoside showed a significant positive correlation with the relative abundance of Alternaria (P < .05).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Heatmap of correlation between the relative abundance of endophytic fungi and flavonoids contents, (a–c) represent the contents in the leaves, stems, and roots, respectively. *: P < .05; **: P < .01; ***: P < .001.

Discussion

SB and its relevant preparations are widely used because of its medicinal value. In recent years, the natural resources of SB have been deficient and gradually replaced by cultivated plants, resulting in expansion of the planting area and increased production.15 Endophytic fungi have been suggested to promote the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in host plants.16–18 Therefore, screening endophytic fungi that can promote host plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis is an effective way to improve the host quality. Our study thus focused on the endophytic fungal community composition of wild and cultivated SB collected from five sampling sites in Hebei Province, China. The correlation between the endophytic fungal community and flavonoids of host plants in different organs was analyzed to screen endophytic fungi that might promote host plant flavonoid synthesis.

In the current study, Alternaria was dominant in all the leaves and stems of SB, consistent with the results of previous studies.19,20 We found that Fusarium was dominant in the roots of all samples except WDZ, consistent with the findings of Li et al.19 and Ji et al.,20 who reported that Fusarium is one of the dominant genera in the roots of SB. Several Fusarium species are pathogens that cause root diseases in SB.21 Therefore, our results indicate the importance of prevention and control measures for root diseases caused by Fusarium during the growth of SB. Meanwhile, we found that Alternaria was dominant in the SB collected from all sampling sites, which is consistent with previous studies.19,20 Further, Alternaria was dominant in wild and cultivated SB, consistent with the findings of Li et al.19 and Ji et al.,20 who reported the dominance of Alternaria in wild and cultivated SB. Our results revealed that the endophytic fungi of SB showed organ, region, and growth pattern specificity, which has also been observed in other plants.22–24

Our results showed that CDY, LHY, and LHZ had higher alpha diversity indices, whereas the other two samples had relatively low alpha diversity indices. Notably, CDY, LHY, and LHZ were all collected from Chengde city, which is the genuine producing area of SB, while the other two samples were collected from non-genuine producing areas, indicating that the endophytic fungi of SB growing in genuine producing areas were more abundant; this phenomenon was also found in Glycyrrhiza uralensis,25 Scrophularia ningpoensis Hemsl,26 Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.27 Further, the results of PcoA and UPGMA also suggested that endophytic fungi in SB collected from closer sampling sites had similar community compositions, whereas those in SB collected from distant sampling sites had different community compositions.28,29 Interestingly, we found that all endophytic fungi in the wild samples did not have a higher alpha diversity index than that of cultivated samples. Our results indicated that growth pattern had little effect on the diversity of endophytic fungi, consistent with the results of Chen et al.30

In our study, the five flavonoids (baicalin, wogonoside, baicalein, wogonin, and oroxylin A) in the roots of SB were significantly higher than those in the stems and leaves of all samples, consistent with the results of Shen et al.31 These five flavonoids have relatively high contents in SB roots.32 Our results also indicate that the contents of five flavonoids in the roots of wild SB were not higher than those in cultivated SB, consistent with the results of Guo et al.33 The flavonoid contents in the roots of SB grown in genuine producing areas were not higher than those in SB grown in non-genuine producing areas, consistent with the findings of Li et al.34 These results also suggest that it is unscientific to evaluate the quality of SB based only on flavonoid content.

Previous studies have already demonstrated that some endophytic fungi and their host plants have established a special relationship that can significantly influence the formation of secondary metabolic products in plants, thereby affecting the quantity of crude drugs derived from medicinal plants.35 This study investigated the relationship between the endophytic fungal community and baicalin, wogonoside, baicalein, wogonin, and oroxylin A in SB. Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that baicalin, wogonoside, wogonin, and oroxylin A in SB were positively correlated with the relative abundance of Alternaria. We thus speculated that Alternaria spp. might contribute to flavonoid biosynthesis in SB. Several Alternaria species are known to produce flavonoids in their host plants. Shi et al.36 found that Alternaria sp. MG1, isolated from Vitis vinifera L. cv. Merlo has a stable and high resveratrol-producing capability. Kou et al.37 isolated three Alternaria species that produces flavonoids in Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja.

To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the diversity and community composition of culturable endophytic fungi in wild and cultivated SB collected from five sites in Hebei province, China. Our results indicated that Alternaria was the dominant genus in leaves and stems in all samples, whereas Fusarium was dominant in the roots of all samples except WDZ. Alternaria was the dominant genus in SB from all sampling sites, and Alternaria was the dominant genus in wild and cultivated SB. Alpha diversity and beta diversity analyses revealed that the producing area was one of the main factors affecting the diversity and community composition of endophytic fungi in SB. The contents of the five flavonoids in the roots of SB were higher than those in the leaves and stems. The flavonoid content in the roots was not affected by production area or growth pattern. Further, we speculated that Alternaria spp. might contribute to the accumulation of flavonoids in SB. Subsequently, based on these results mentioned above, we plan to use traditional co-culture or elicitor induction experiments in future studies to screen specific Alternaria strains that can promote flavonoid synthesis in the host.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (No. H2020423254), Research Foundation of Hebei Province Education Department (No. QN2019098), Program of Hebei Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 2019085), Fourth National Traditional Chinese Medicine Resources Survey of China (Z135080000022), and Innovation Team of Hebei Province Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (No. HBCT2018060205).

Author contributions

CS and YZ conceived and designed the experiments; XC and HF performed the experiments and analyzed the data; and XC and LW prepared the manuscript. All authors discussed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Lin W, Liu S, Wu B.. Structural identification of chemical constituents from Scutellaria baicalensis by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and NMR spectroscopy. Asian J Chem. 2013;25:3799–8. doi: 10.14233/ajchem.2013.13788. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Song J, Zhang L, Xu Y, Yang D, Zhang L, Yang S, Zhang W, Wang J, Tian S, Yang S, Yuan T, Liu A, Lv Q, Li F, Liu H, Hou B, Peng X, Lu Y, Du G . The comprehensive study on the therapeutic effects of baicalein for the treatment of COVID-19 in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;183:114302. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun X, Tao JL, Xu SJ, Yuan B.. The Molecular Mechanism of Treating COVID-19 with Huashi Baidu Formula based on Network Pharmacology. J Chin Med Mater. 2020:2047–2052. doi: 10.13863/j.1001-4454.2020.08.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sun YW, W H, Chen Y, Lai S, Yang ZM, Chen JS. Mechanism of Tanreqing injection on treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. Chin Traditional Herbal Drugs. 2020:51. doi: 10.7501/j.0253-2670.2020.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shen F, ZY F, Wu YR, Li L, Zhao YD, Xia Y, Kuang GY. The potential molecular mechanism of active compounds binding SARS-CoV-2 specifictarget proteins in Huaqing granules treat COVID-19 based on network pharmacology and high-throughput molecular docking fellowship. Mod Traditional Chin Med Materia Materia-World Sci Technol. 2020. doi: 10.11842/wst.20200317010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miao G, Zhao H, Guo K, Cheng J, Zhang S, Zhang X, Cai Z, Miao H, Shang Y. Mechanisms underlying attenuation of apoptosis of cortical neurons in the hypoxic brain by flavonoids from the stems and leaves of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9:1592–1598. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.141784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cao Y, Liang L, Xu J, Wu J, Yan Y, Lin P, Chen Q, Zheng F, Wang Q, Ren Q, Gou Z, Du Y . The effect of Scutellaria baicalensis stem-leaf flavonoids on spatial learning and memory in chronic cerebral ischemia-induced vascular dementia of rats. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2016;48:437–446. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmw024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttila AM, Compant S, Campisano A, Doring M, Sessitsch A. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79:293–320. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhalnina K, Louie KB, Hao Z, Mansoori N, da Rocha UN, Shi S, Cho H, Karaoz U, Loque D, Bowen BP, Firestone KM, Northen TR, Brodie EL . Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:470–480. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li JL, Sun X, Zheng Y, Lu PP, Wang YL, Guo LD. Diversity and community of culturable endophytic fungi from stems and roots of desert halophytes in northwest China. MycoKeys. 2020;62:75–95. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.62.38923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thongkantha S, Lumyong S, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD. Fungal saprobes and pathogens occurring on tissues of Dracaena lourieri and Pandanus spp. in Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2008;30:149–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kamarudin AN, Lai KS, Lamasudin DU, Idris AS, Balia Yusof ZN. Enhancement of thiamine biosynthesis in oil palm seedlings by colonization of endophytic fungus Hendersonia toruloidea. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen H, Qi Y, He X, Xu L, Zhang W, Lv X, Zhang H, Yang D, Zhu Y, Liang Z. Endophytic fungus Mucor circinelloides DF20 promote tanshinone biosynthesis and accumulation in Salvia miltiorrhiza root. Plant Sci. 2021;307:110898. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu X, Zhou ZY, Cui JL, Wang ML, Wang JH. Biotransformation ability of endophytic fungi: from species evolution to industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2021;105:7095–7113. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11554-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yan B, Xu W, Su S, Zhu S, Zhu Z, Zeng H, Zhao M, Qian D, Duan JA. Comparative analysis of 15 chemical constituents in Scutellaria baicalensis stem-leaf from different regions in China by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci. 2017;40:3570–3581. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201700473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye HT, Luo SQ, Yang ZN, Wang YS, Ding Q, Wang KF, Yang SX, Wang Y. Endophytic fungi stimulate the concentration of medicinal secondary metabolites in houttuynia cordata thunb. Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16:1929731. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2021.1929731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lin LC, Lin CY, Lin WR, Tung YT, Wu JH. Effects of ericoid mycorrhizal fungi or dark septate endophytic fungi on the secondary metabolite of Rhododendron Pseudochrysanthum (R. Morii) seedlings. Appl Ecol Env Res. 2021;19:1221–1232. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1902_12211232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen H, Chen J, Qi Y, Chu S, Ma Y, Xu L, Lv S, Zhang H, Yang D, Zhu Y, Mans DR, Liang Z . Endophytic fungus Cladosporium tenuissimum DF11, an efficient inducer of tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza roots. Phytochemistry. 2022;194:113021. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.113021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li QL, H S, Chi WD, l F. Isolation, identification and inhibitory activity screening of endophytic fungi from wild plants of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi. Microbiol China. 2010;37(3):381–388. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.China.2010.03.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ji YL, Dq L, Li DS, Zhu GQ, Gao BY, Yang YL. Isolation of endophytic fungi from Scutellaria baicalensis growing in Shangluo region and screening of their inhibitory activities to plant pathogens. Hubei Agric Sci. 2011;50(23):4847–4851. doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.0439-8114.2011.23.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao J, Zeng ZH, Shen L, Hao JF, Yin JL. Analysis for experimental effects of 4 medicament (rotoronitrile and pyridium etc.) on controlling Scutellaria root rot. Shaanxi J Agric Sci. 2018;64:29–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zuo Y, Li X, Yang J, Liu J, Zhao L, He X. Fungal endophytic community and diversity associated with desert shrubs driven by plant identity and organ differentiation in extremely arid desert ecosystem. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;8:7. doi: 10.3390/jof7070578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang YL, Gao C, Chen L, Ji NN, Wu BW, Lu PP, Li XC, Qian X, Maitra P, Babalola BJ, Zheng, Y, Guo, LL . Community assembly of endophytic fungi in ectomycorrhizae of betulaceae plants at a regional scale. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:3105. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fan Y, Gao L, Chang P, Li Z. Endophytic fungal community in grape is correlated to foliar age and domestication. Ann Microbiol. 2020:70. doi: 10.1186/s13213-020-01574-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen J, Xu Z, Zhang X, Li YF, Liu CS. Diversity and isolation parameters of endophytes from Glycyrrhiza uralensis of different habitats. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. 2019;54(2):373–379. doi: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2018-0952. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shen CY, Zhu B, Zhang QL, Zhang QP, Qin LP. Comparative study on distribution of endophytic fungi in Scrophularia ningpoensis from different habitats. Chin Traditional Herbal Drugs. 2019:50. doi: 10.7501/j.0253-2670.2019.04.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang YL, Yan ZY, Guo XH, Song J, Chen X, Wan DG. Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi from Ligusticum. China J Chin Materia Medica. 2008;33:999–1001. 1001-5302(2008)09-0999-03. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen D, Jia L, Hou Q, Zhao X, Sun K. Analysis of endophyte diversity of Rheum palmatum from different production areas in Gansu province of China and the association with secondary metabolite. Microorganisms. 2021;9:978. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9050978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Deng ZS, Liu XD, Zhang BC, Jiao S, Qi XY, Sun ZH, He XL, Liu YZ, Li J, Chen KK, Lin ZX, Jiang YY . The root endophytic fungi community structure of Pennisetum sinese from four representative provinces in China. Microorganisms. 2019;7:332 . doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen ST. Diversity, difference and antimicrobial activities in the endophytic fungus of dendrobium huoshanen Anhui University of Traditional Medicine. 2019. doi: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2020.12.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shen J, Li P, He CN, Liu HT, Liu YZ, Sun XB, Xu R, Xiao PG. Simultaneous determination of 15 flavonoids from different parts of Scutellaria baicalensis and its chemometrics analysis. Chin Herb Med. 2019;11:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chmed.2018.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bochorakova H, Paulova H, Slanina J, Musil P, Taborska E. Main flavonoids in the root of Scutellaria baicalensis cultivated in Europe and their comparative antiradical properties. Phytother Res. 2003;17:640–644. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guo LL, Liu Y, Lu MJ, Bai TT, Fu R, Wang HY, Yan YG, Zhang G, Peng L. Simultaneous determination of nine components of Scutellaria Baicalensis in different habitats and growth years by HPLC. Chin Traditional Herbal Drugs. 2018;49:935–940. doi: 10.7501/j.0253-2670.2018.04.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li W, Li H, Yang B, Feng XF, Ge XX, Liu JY. Comparative study on chemcial composition between cultivated and wild Radix Scutellariae. China J Chin Materia Medica. 2008;33:1425–1429. 1001-5302(2008)12-1425-05338 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jia M, Chen L, Xin HL, Zheng CJ, Rahman K, Han T, Qin LP. A friendly relationship between endophytic fungi and medicinal plants: a systematic review. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:906. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shi J, Zeng Q, Liu Y, Pan Z. Alternaria sp. MG1, a resveratrol-producing fungus: isolation, identification, and optimal cultivation conditions for resveratrol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95:369–379. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kou XL, Xei N, Wu CE, Fan GJ, Fu XX. Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi from Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja. J Nanjing Forest Univ (Nat Sci Edition). 2020:44. doi: 10.3969/j.1000-2006.201812001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES