Skip to main content
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry
. 2022 May 5;37(1):1320–1326. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2022.2070909

Discovery of small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase

Supreet Kaur a,*, Nicholas S Nieto a, Peter McDonald b, Josh R Beck c, Richard B Honzatko a, Anuradha Roy b, Scott W Nelson a,
PMCID: PMC9090415  PMID: 35514163

Abstract

Malaria is caused by infection with protozoan parasites of the Plasmodium genus, which is part of the phylum Apicomplexa. Most organisms in this phylum contain a relic plastid called the apicoplast. The apicoplast genome is replicated by a single DNA polymerase (apPOL), which is an attractive target for anti-malarial drugs. We screened small-molecule libraries (206,504 compounds) using a fluorescence-based high-throughput DNA polymerase assay. Dose/response analysis and counter-screening identified 186 specific apPOL inhibitors. Toxicity screening against human HepaRG human cells removed 84 compounds and the remaining were subjected to parasite killing assays using chloroquine resistant P. falciparum parasites. Nine compounds were potent inhibitors of parasite growth and may serve as lead compounds in efforts to discover novel malaria drugs.

Keywords: Malaria, high-throughput screening, DNA polymerase, apicoplast

Introduction

Malaria kills over half a million people each year with the majority of those deaths occurring in children under five years of age1. Over 40% of the world’s population live in areas where Malaria is a serious health risk with more than 215 million new cases diagnosed each year1. During the last century, Malaria was controlled with chloroquine, but resistance emerged in the 1950s, starting in Southeast Asia, then spreading throughout Asia, and finally Africa2. Artemisinin and its derivatives are current drugs of choice and are especially effective in combination with slow-acting anti-malarial drugs. In 2005, partial resistance to artemisinin arose in parasites from Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand and Viet Nam3. Parasites resistant to artemisinin-based therapies are now prevalent in Southeast Asia and are emerging in Africa, jeopardising global programs to control Malaria. New drugs targeting novel parasite biology may play a critical role in curbing the impact of this disease4–7.

Malaria is caused by parasites of the genus Plasmodium in the phylum Apicomplexa8. Nearly all organisms within this phylum contain an unusual organelle called the apicoplast. The apicoplast is evolutionarily related to the chloroplast and participates in several metabolic pathways, including the biosynthesis of fatty acids, haem, iron-sulfur clusters, and isoprenoids9. The parasite relies on the apicoplast for the synthesis of isoprenoids. Defects in apicoplast metabolism, or its failure to replicate and divide, lead to the death of Plasmodium at the blood and liver stages of infection10. Hence, the apicoplast is a promising drug target11.

Nearly 600 proteins exist within the apicoplast and approximately 4% of those are involved in replication of the 35 kb apicoplast genome12. Enzymes that carry-out the fundamental process of DNA replication are promising drug targets. Indeed, ciprofloxacin, a DNA type II topoisomerase inhibitor, has anti-malarial activity; however, antiparasitic properties could be due to off-target effects instead of, or as well as, inhibition of the P. falciparum gyrase13 The apicoplast DNA polymerase (apPOL) represents an attractive target for anti-malarial drug development14. apPOL exhibits low amino-acid sequence identity to replicative polymerases from other species. Outside of Apicomplexa, the nearest homolog (35% sequence identity) is the replicative polymerase from the cyanobacteria Cyanothece sp. PCC 8802. The most similar human DNA polymerases are the lesion bypass polymerases theta and nu (23% and 22% sequence identity, respectively), with the other human DNA polymerases displaying less than 20% identity, providing a foundation for selectivity. On the other hand, apPOLs from the two primary causative agents of human Malaria (P. falciparum and P. vivax) are 84% sequence identical, suggesting that drugs targeting P. falciparum apPOL would be effective in treating Malaria caused by P. vivax.

To discover novel inhibitors of P. falciparum apPOL (hereafter, Pf-apPOL), we screened several commercial small-molecule libraries using a fluorescence-based high-throughput DNA polymerase assay. The primary hits were subjected to dose/response analysis and counter-screening against bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase to remove non-specific inhibitors and compounds that interfered with the assay. The specific Pf-apPOL inhibitors (186) were screened for toxicity against human cells and non-toxic compounds (102) were tested in parasite killing assays using chloroquine resistant P. falciparum parasites cultured in human red blood cells. Ultimately, nine inhibitors passed all screens and arrested parasite growth in human red blood cells.

Materials and methods

Materials and reagents

Codon-optimized, exonuclease-deficient Pf-apPOL was overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and purified as described15. The protein was dialysed against two, 1-liter changes of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 400 mM NaCl, and 20% glycerol. Plasmodium bergei and Babesia bovis apPOLs (Pb-apPOL and Bb-apPOL, respectively) were codon-optimized, expressed, and purified as for Pf-apPOL15. Bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase was purified as described16. The DNA oligonucleotides used to make the high-throughput substrate were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. Deoxynucleotides were purchased from Strategene. All other materials came from Fisher Scientific.

High-throughput (HT) assay

The HT assay employs a molecular beacon, a stem-loop DNA template with a Cy3 dye and the Black Hole Quencher on the 3′ and 5′ ends of the DNA, respectively15. Pf-apPOL concentration is based on a calculated absorptivity of ε280 = 56750 M−1 cm−1. Reactions were carried out at 25 °C, using Corning 3575 386-well plates (well-volume, 20 µL). Assays testing for compound inhibition composed of reaction buffer (pH 7.9 in 50 mM potassium acetate, 20 mM Tris-acetate and 10 mM magnesium acetate), Pf-apPOL (20 nM), DNA substrate (20 nM), dNTPs (6 µM), and compound (10 µM in DMSO). The DNA and nucleotide substrates (dNTPs) were at concentrations of 20 nM and 6 µM, respectively, in the assay. Pf-apPOL was incubated in the reaction buffer with dNTPs and the compound of interest (10 µM, in the assay) at 25 °C for 10 min. The DNA substrate was then added and the reaction was allowed to proceed for 90 min at 25 °C.

Each assay plate contained 16 negative controls (no Pf-apPOL, DMSO present) and 16 positive controls (Pf-apPOL present, no DMSO). The fluorescence of each well was determined using a BioTek Synergy Neo fluorescence plate reader using excitation and emission wavelengths of 555 and 570 nm, respectively. The % inhibition was determined using Equation (1):

% Inhibition=100TestMinMaxMin *100 (1)

In the above, Min is the average of fluorescence emission of the negative controls (substrate only), Max the average fluorescence emission from the positive controls (enzyme + substrate), and Test the emission from the assays in the presence of compounds (enzyme + compound + substrates). Dose-response confirmation assays were performed under similar conditions as the primary screen, but monitoring fluorescence at 10, 90, and 180 min. Tested concentrations of compounds were 2.5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 µM. The IC50 of each compound was determined using Equation (2):

IC50= Vmax(1+ (IIC50)n) (2)

In the above, n measures cooperativity, with n > 1 indicating synergistic binding of more than a single molecule of the compound.

Parasite growth inhibition assay

The chloroquine resistant P. falciparum parasites (strain Dd2) were cultured in de-identified, IRB-exempt human red blood cells (RBCs) obtained from the American Red Cross and parasite cultures were maintained as described17. Parasitaemia (percentage of total RBCs infected) was measured by flow cytometry on an Attune NxT (ThermoFisher) by nucleic-acid staining of cultured RBCs with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.8 µg ml−1 acridine orange. We began by determining percent growth inhibition at single compound dose (20 µM) for the 102 non-toxic compounds. Those that inhibited parasite growth by 50% or more were subjected to dose response analysis to extract EC50 values. The experiments were initiated with a starting parasitaemia of ∼1% and parasitaemia was measured 72 and 96 h post compound addition. Growth was normalised to parasite cultures with carrier only (DMSO).

Results and discussion

High-throughput screening of small molecule libraries to identify inhibitors of apPOL

To identify apPOL inhibitors we utilised our previously developed high-throughput DNA polymerase assay15. The HT assay is based on a molecular beacon DNA template that forms a stem-loop with a Cy3 dye and the Black Hole Quencher on the 3′ and 5′ ends of the DNA, respectively. DNA polymerase activity extends an annealed primer through the stem region, displacing the fluorophore from the quencher, thereby increasing its fluorescence (Figure 1(A)). The assay accurately recapitulates the kinetic behaviour of apPOL, as measured through more conventional low-throughput gel-based assays18. The Z′ factor for the assay described here was 0.9 across all plates (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

High-throughput screening. (A) The fluorescent-based DNA polymerase assay used to screen the compound libraries. The DNA template strand is a hairpin loop with a primer annealed to the loop. The 3’ end of the primer is 11 bases away from the 6 bp duplex. Strand displacement activity of the DNA polymerase separates the Cy3 dye from the Black hole quencher leading to an increase in fluorescent signal. (B) The high-throughput assay workflow. The DNA polymerase is incubated with 10 mM compound for 10 min prior to addition of the hairpin substrate. The reaction is quenched at 3 different time points and the fluorescent signal is measured and % inhibition is determined using the provided equation.

The initial screen followed the workflow outlined in Figure 1(B). The identity of the compound libraries screened and the resulting primary hits are given in Table 1 with a scattergram of the percent inhibition for each well shown in Figure 2. A total of 206,504 compounds were tested for inhibition of Pf-apPOL with 1217 compounds qualifying as “hits” for an overall rate of 0.59%. Natural products and natural product-like compounds were overrepresented in the hit subgroup, with rates of 4.8% for the GreenPharma natural product library and 1.4% for the Life Chemicals natural product-like library. Also overrepresented (2.7%) was the Sigma Lopac 1280 library, which contains exclusively pharmacologically active compounds.

Table 1.

Results from high-throughput screening to identify inhibitors of P. falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase.

Library Total # of Compounds # of Hits Hit Rate Dose-response reconfirmation (# of compounds) Reconfirmation rate, %
Chembridge Diversity 43736 250 0.57 205 82
ChemDiv Diversity 56232 293 0.52 267 91
CMLD 5208 22 0.42 21 96
Life Diversity 15040 64 0.43 54 84
GreenPharma Natural Products 480 23 4.79 20 87
Life chemicals Nature Product-like 8128 114 1.4 71 62
ChemDiv CNS 26136 120 0.46 102 85
ChemDiv BFL/PPL 33864 61 0.18 53 87
Sigma Lopac 1280 35 2.73 27 77
Maybridge Hit finder 2016 14400 217 1.51 148 68
Maybridge MinHitFinder 2016 2000 18 0.9 11 61
Total 206504 1217 0.59 979 80
Average Hit Rate (%)          

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A scattergram of the large-scale screen of 11 compound libraries (listed at right). The overall hit rate for the screen was 0.59%.

Each compound was tested in a dose-response format to determine IC50 values. Out of the 1217 compounds identified as hits, 979 exhibited potential inhibition in dose-response reconfirmation assays (80.4%). These compounds were structurally diverse with only 8 clusters containing 10 or more compounds (Supplemental Figure S1). Example dose-response data for clusters with relatively high and low affinities are shown in Supplemental Figures S2 and S3, respectively. The 979 compounds likely include some that interfere with the fluorescent read-out of the assay (false positives). Additionally, many of the identified compounds resemble DNA mimics or nucleotide analogs and are likely non-specific inhibitors of nucleic-acid polymerases and enzymes that bind nucleic acids. To identify compounds that specifically inhibit P. falciparum apPOL, we screened the 979 potential inhibitors against bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase19. T4 DNA polymerase can be produced in large quantities, and is in the same family (B-family) as the replicative human DNA polymerases (α, δ, and ε)20. The majority of the 979 compounds (793) inhibited T4 DNA polymerase. Further investigation of these non-selective inhibitors of DNA polymerase could reveal modes of inhibition that are common across multiple DNA polymerase families. The remaining compounds (186) represent “primary” hits, that is, specific inhibitors of P. falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase. On the basis of cluster analysis, primary hits are structurally diverse with only two clusters containing 10 or more compounds (Supplemental Figure S4). The vast majority of the compounds (94%) do not violate any of the Lipinski’s rule of five (Supplemental Figure S4 and file 1).

Toxicity of the primary hits towards human cells

As a measurement of toxicity, we employed the well-established CellTiter-Glo™ Luminescent Cell Viability Assay using HepaRG human cells. These cells contain endogenous luciferase enzyme that uses ATP and d-Luciferin to produce excited oxyluciferin, which then returns to its ground state by the emission of a photon (luminescence). Metabolically active cells generate ATP, hence luminescence is proportional to ATP present and an indication of cellular metabolic activity. The assay is robust, sensitive, reproducible, and routinely used in a high-throughput format at the KU-HTS facility21. The results from the 48 h cytotoxicity assay indicate that 102 of the 186 primary hits are non-toxic to the human hepatic cells (55%) at the highest concentration tested (100 µM). Cluster analysis indicates 68 groups of non-similar compounds, including clusters of 10 and 12 from the set of 186 apPOL-specific inhibitors (Figure 3). In addition to analysing the compounds for Lipinski violations, we also used SwissADME to determine the synthetic accessibility score and lead-likeness score for each compound23. The synthetic accessibility score ranges from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very hard) and has been shown to correlate well with manual estimations of synthetic difficulty performed by chemists24. The majority of the compounds appear to be synthetically tractable with scores ranging from 2–4 and only 7 molecules scoring above 4.0 (Figure 4). Lead-likeness is determined through a combination of physiochemical filters (e.g. PAINS25 and Brenk26), and the notion that selection criteria for lead compounds should emphasise low molecular weights (100–350 Da) and degree of polarity (clgP) values of 1–3.0 because optimisation of leads generally increase size and lipophilicity. As a consequence, leads are required to be smaller and less hydrophobic than drug-like molecules23,27. From the set of 102 non-toxic apPOL inhibitors, 30 compounds have no lead-likeness violations and another 31 compounds only violate a single criteria, indicating that the majority of these compounds are potential leads.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A plot of FragFp similarity for the non-toxic, specific apPOL inhibitors (102 compounds). Chemical similarity was calculated using the DataWarrior22 software package. The core structure for the two largest clusters are given. Each compound is labelled with a number corresponding to the data in Supplemental file 1. The markers are coloured according to IC50 values and the number of Lipinski violations are indicated by marker shape.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Potential as lead compounds. A plot of the synthetic accessibility versus leadlikeness violations for the non-toxic, specific apPOL inhibitors is shown. Each compound is labelled with a number corresponding to the data in Supplemental file 1. The markers are coloured according to their IC50 values and the number of Lipinski violations are indicated by marker shape. A description of synthetic accessibility and leadlikeness can be found in the main text.

Lethality of compounds towards cultured P. falciparum parasites

We tested the ability of the 102 compounds to kill P. falciparum parasites cultured in human red blood cells. Due to the number of compounds, we used a single inhibitor concentration of 20 µM and performed experiments in triplicate. These single-dose assays identified 9 compounds that inhibited parasite growth by more than 50%. These compounds were then tested in a dose-response format against chloroquine resistant P. falciparum parasites (Dd2) and the resulting data were fit to a sigmoidal growth inhibition curve to determine EC50 values (Figure 5, Table 2). Additionally, these compounds were tested for in vitro inhibition of P. berghei (Pb) and Babesia bovis (Bb) apicolast DNA polymerases, which are 82% and 43% identical to the P. falciparum protein, respectively. Inhibition of Pb-apPOL is a desired feature because it is likely that future in vivo studies will be performed in the mouse model for Malaria. Inhibition of Bb-apPOL, but not the more distantly related B-family polymerase T4 DNA pol, would suggest that the inhibitor may be pan-selective against most apicoplast apPOL’s. The in vitro polymerase assays identified 5 compounds that were potent inhibitors of all three apicoplast polymerases and a single compound that inhibited Pf-apPOL and Bb-apPOL but not Pb-apPOL (Table 2). Finally, to determine if the compounds were killing the parasites solely via apicoplast disruption28, the dose-response curves were also performed with 1 mM isopentylpyrophosphate (IPP) in the growth media (Table 2). As seen in Table 2, none of the compounds display a significant IPP effect, suggesting that these compounds are hitting multiple cellular targets (e.g. apPOL and a non-apicoplast protein) or a specific non-apicoplast target. At this time, it is unclear what the non-apicoplast target(s) may be. One intriguing possibility is that these compounds may be targeting both the apicoplast and the mitochondrial DNA polymerases. Very little is known regarding mitochondrial DNA replication in P. falciparum; however, signal sequence identification algorithms have predicted that the other bacterial A-family DNA polymerase residing in P. falciparum is targeted to the mitochondria (PF3D7_0625300)29. As five of these Pf-apPOL inhibitors have the ability to inhibit the distantly related Bb-apPOL, it would not be surprising if they also inhibited the only other A-family polymerase in P. falciparum. The mitochondria has been recognised as a promising drug target30,31 and saturating transposon mutagenesis in P. falciparum32 as well as pooled knockout screens in P. berghei33 indicate that this A-family polymerase is likely essential. We are currently in the process of cloning and expressing this putative mitochondrial DNA polymerase to determine the effect of these compounds on its activity. If inhibition of the mitochondrial DNA polymerase is confirmed, these compounds would have very high potential for further development, since dual targeting both DNA polymerases residing within the parasite would increase potency and reduce the evolution of drug resistance.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Compounds active against cultured Plasmodium falciparum. A plot of IC50 values versus EC50 values is shown. The markers are coloured according to their Druglinkess values as calculated by the DataWarrior22 software package. The number of Lipinski violations are indicated by marker shape.

Table 2.

Inhibition data for compounds found to be active against cultured Plasmodium falciparum.

Molecule KUID IC50 Pf-apPOL (µM) IC50 Pb-apPOL (µM) IC50 Bb-apPOL (µM) EC50 (µM) EC50 + IPP (µM)
1 KU0263501 5.9 ± 0.9 7.1 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 0.2 8.6 ± 0.4 9.3 ± 0.5
21 KU0036696 8 ± 1 9.7 ± 1.6 8 ± 2 3.1 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1
27 KU0260920 15 ± 1 ND ND 10 ± 1 9 ± 1
31 KU0007309 15 ± 1 ND 15 ± 5 8.9 ± 0.5 8.7 ± 0.6
34 KU0241474 7.2 ± 0.9 ND ND 11.3 ± 0.9 10.0 ± 0.7
55 KU0177470 10 ± 2 51.9 ± 3.5 1.5 ± 1.0 3.5 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.2
94 KU0261556 7.6 ± 0.6 13.9 ± 1.6 30 ± 3 4.6 ± 0.2 3.7 ± 0.5
95 KU0001071 7.4 ± 0.4 8.6 ± 0.7 2.5 ± 0.2 7.5 ± 0.5 7.4 ± 0.4
98 KU0271653 8 ± 2 ND ND 16 ± 1 11 ± 1

Conclusions

Resistance to current Malaria drugs is inevitable and new drugs that target novel aspects of P. falciparum’s biology are necessary to combat the disease. The apicoplast is a validated drug target and inhibition of apicoplast DNA replication leads to the loss of the organelle and parasite death34. The large-scale high-throughput screen described here defined several sets of compounds that could serve as tools to investigate mechanisms of DNA polymerase inhibition or as lead compounds for further optimisation into anti-malaria drugs. Future work will involve determining mechanisms of inhibition, apPOL binding sites, and target(s) confirmation.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Grants [R21AI127622, P20GM113117, and P30CA168524-09].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Organization, W. H., World Malaria Report 2020. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wellems TE, Plowe CV.. Chloroquine-resistant malaria. J Infect Dis 2001;184:770–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wongsrichanalai C, Sibley CH.. Fighting drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum: the challenge of artemisinin resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:908–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.White NJ. Antimalarial drug resistance. J Clin Investig 2004;113:1084–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burrows JN, Leroy D, Lotharius J, Waterson D.. Challenges in antimalarial drug discovery. Future Med Chem 2011;3:1401–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Uwimana A, Umulisa N, Venkatesan M, et al. . Association of Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H genotypes with delayed parasite clearance in Rwanda: an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, therapeutic efficacy study. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:1120–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balikagala B, Fukuda N, Ikeda M, et al. . Evidence of artemisinin-resistant Malaria in Africa. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1163–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kalanon M, McFadden GI.. Malaria, Plasmodium falciparum and its apicoplast. Biochem Soc Trans 2010;38:775–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seeber F, Soldati-Favre D.. Metabolic pathways in the apicoplast of apicomplexa. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2010;281:161–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yeh E, Derisi JL.. Chemical Rescue of malaria parasites lacking an apicoplast defines organelle function in blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Biol 2011;9:e1001138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dahl EL, Rosenthal PJ.. Apicoplast translation, transcription and genome replication: targets for antimalarial antibiotics. Trends Parasitol 2008;24:279–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ralph SA, van Dooren GG, Waller RF, et al. . Tropical infectious diseases: metabolic maps and functions of the Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:203–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Girdwood SCT, Nenortas E, Shapiro TA.. Targeting the gyrase of Plasmodium falciparum with topoisomerase poisons. Biochem Pharmacol 2015;95:227–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seow F, Sato S, Janssen CS, et al. . The plastidic DNA replication enzyme complex of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2005;141:145–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miller ME, Parrott E, Singh R, Nelson SW.. A high-throughput assay to identify inhibitors of the apicoplast DNA polymerase from plasmodium falciparum. J Biomol Screen 2014;19:966–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang J, Trakselis MA, Roccasecca RM, et al. . The application of a minicircle substrate in the study of the coordinated T4 DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem 2003;278:49828–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nessel T, Beck JM, Rayatpisheh S, et al. . EXP1 is required for organization of EXP2 in the intraerythrocytic malaria parasite vacuole. Cell Microbiol 2020;22:e13168. e13168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wingert BM, Parrott EE, Nelson SW.. Fidelity, mismatch extension, and proofreading activity of the Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 2013;52:7723–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nelson SW, Zhuang Z, Spiering MM, Benkovic SJ, T4 phage replisome. Viral Genome Replication. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jain R, Aggarwal AK, Rechkoblit O.. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2018;53:77–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Peterson KR, Costa FC, Fedosyuk H, et al. . A cell-based high-throughput screen for novel chemical inducers of fetal hemoglobin for treatment of hemoglobinopathies. PLoS One 2014;9:e107006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sander T, Freyss J, von Korff M, Rufener C.. DataWarrior: an open-source program for chemistry aware data visualization and analysis. J Chem Inf Model 2015;55:460–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V.. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep 2017;7:42717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ertl P, Schuffenhauer A.. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. J Cheminform 2009;1:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baell JB, Holloway GA.. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. J Med Chem 2010;53:2719–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brenk R, Schipani A, James D, et al. . Lessons learnt from assembling screening libraries for drug discovery for neglected diseases. ChemMedChem 2008;3:435–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hann MM, Keseru GM.. Finding the sweet spot: the role of nature and nurture in medicinal chemistry. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012;11:355–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Milton ME, Nelson SW.. Replication and maintenance of the Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast genome. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2016;208:56–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vaidya AB, Mather MW.. Mitochondrial evolution and functions in malaria parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol 2009;63:249–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goodman CD, Buchanan HD, McFadden GI.. Is the mitochondrion a good malaria drug target? Trends Parasitol 2017;33:185–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kumar S, Bhardwaj TR, Prasad DN, Singh RK.. Drug targets for resistant malaria: historic to future perspectives. Biomed Pharmacother 2018;104:8–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang M, Wang C, Otto TD, et al. . Uncovering the essential genes of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum by saturation mutagenesis. Science 2018;360:eaap7847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bushell E, Gomes AR, Sanderson T, et al. . Functional profiling of a Plasmodium genome reveals an abundance of Essential Genes. Cell 2017;170:260–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Low LM, Stanisic DI, Good MF.. Exploiting the apicoplast: apicoplast-targeting drugs and malaria vaccine development. Microbes Infect 2018;20:477–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Articles from Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES