Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 May 12;12:7909. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12117-4

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a prognostic biomarker of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

Eunjeong Son 1, Woo Hyun Cho 1, Jin Ho Jang 1, Taehwa Kim 1, Doosoo Jeon 1, Yun Seong Kim 1, Hye Ju Yeo 1,2,
PMCID: PMC9098871  PMID: 35552507

Abstract

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is produced in the bronchial and alveolar cells of inflamed lungs and is regarded as a potential prognostic biomarker in various respiratory diseases. However, there are no studies on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). NGAL levels in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were measured at baseline and on day 7 in 110 patients with ARDS. Baseline NGAL levels were significantly higher in ARDS patients than in healthy controls (serum 25 [14.5–41] vs. 214 [114.5–250.3] ng/mL; BAL 90 [65–115] vs. 211 [124–244] ng/mL). In ARDS, baseline NGAL levels in serum and BAL were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively). Baseline NGAL levels showed a fair predictive power for intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (serum area under the curve (AUC) 0.747, p < 0.001; BAL AUC 0.768, p < 0.001). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline serum NGAL level (> 240 ng/mL) was significantly associated with ICU mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 5.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.67–10.85, p < 0.001). In particular, day 7 NGAL was significantly correlated with day 7 driving pressure (serum r = 0.388, BAL r = 0.702), and 28 ventilator-free days (serum r = − 0.298, BAL r = − 0.297). Baseline NGAL has good prognostic value for ICU mortality in patients with ARDS. NGAL can be a biomarker for ventilator requirement, as it may be indicative of potential alveolar epithelial injury.

Subject terms: Biomarkers, Medical research

Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe form of acute lung injury, with a mortality rate between 34 and 60%1,2. The severity of ARDS is often assessed using the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, but the prognostic value of this variable is limited3. Recently, several biomarkers have been suggested for predicting the prognosis and therapeutic response of ARDS4. However, none of these have been used in clinical practice. Other clinical predictors such as the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score have been used, but they are complex and often not followed5. Simplified and more accurate predictors are still lacking, and many studies on novel biomarkers are ongoing4,6,7.

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a 25-kDa protein released from neutrophils and epithelial cells and may be used as a marker for various inflammatory diseases8. Conventionally, NGAL has been used as a marker of acute kidney injury (AKI), as it rapidly increases in renal tubular cells9. NGAL is also found in bronchial goblet cells and alveolar type II pneumocytes, with increased levels in these cells in inflamed lungs10. In a previous study, we found that NGAL is a potential biomarker of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) in a rat model11. Another study suggested that NGAL may be produced during alveolar cell damage triggered by barotrauma12. Recently, NGAL has been suggested as a valuable biological marker for predicting the severity and prognosis of patients with various respiratory diseases1315.

Despite evidence that NGAL is a potential biomarker for alveolar or bronchial epithelial cell damage, the concentration of NGAL required for predicting the outcome of ARDS and the severity of lung injury is still unknown. In this study, we evaluated NGAL levels from serum and bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) as a potential biomarker for predicting mortality in patients with severe ARDS.

Methods

Study design and patients

Patients aged > 18 years, who were treated for ARDS in the intensive care unit (ICU) from March 2016 to June 2019, were assessed for eligibility in this study. ARDS was defined based on the Berlin definition3. Patients with known chronic kidney disease, patients on hemodialysis, renal transplant recipients, and patients with AKI at admission according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines were excluded16 (Fig. 1). Finally, 110 patients were included. Serial specimens, including serum and BAL, were obtained from the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (PNUYH) biobank; the first within 6 h of admission to the ICU, and the second 7 days after admission. The biobank provided well-banked samples and clinical data. Patients were divided into two groups: survivors at discharge from the ICU, and non-survivors. We retrospectively analyzed the correlations between ICU mortality and the NGAL levels in serum and BAL. This single-center, retrospective cohort study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (PNUYH) (05-2019-185). Informed consent was waived by the PNUYH IRB. The study was performed in accordance with all relevant guidelines and regulations and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of patient inclusion. During the study period, 323 patients were treated for acute respiratory distress syndrome, of which 110 were included in this study. ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, CKD chronic kidney disease, AKI acute kidney injury, ICU intensive care unit, BAL bronchial alveolar lavage.

Data collection

Demographics, renal replacement therapy (RRT), main diagnosis, and laboratory data were collected retrospectively. SOFA, APACHE II, lung injury, and Charlson comorbidity scores, arterial blood gas analysis, C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and ventilator requirement were included. None of the patients had previously received treatment for ARDS. Ventilator-free days (VFDs) were defined as the number of days from successful weaning to day 28; patients who died before weaning were deemed to have no VFDs.

Measurement of NGAL, interleukin (IL)-1b, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels in serum and BAL

Blood samples were collected from 110 patients at baseline and 104 patients at day 7. Blood samples were collected in a serum separate test (SST) tube (Greiner Bio-One, Austria). To test the levels of NGAL and other cytokines, the serum samples were centrifuged at 2500g for 20 min, 1000g for 10 min, and 2000g for 10 min, within 30 min of collection. Aliquots of serum were stored at − 80 °C to facilitate batch analysis. Serum levels of NGAL, IL-1β, and TNF-α were determined in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions using enzyme immunoassays, namely the Human NGAL ELISA Kit (BioPorto Diagnostics A/S, Gentofte, Denmark), the Human IL-1b Pre-Coated ELISA Kit (BioGems, Westlake Village, CA, USA), and the Human TNF-α Pre-Coated ELISA Kit BGK01375 (BioGems). BAL samples were collected from 62 patients at baseline and 55 patients on day 7. Aliquots of BAL were stored at − 80 °C to facilitate batch analysis. The levels of NGAL, IL-1β, and TNF-α in BAL were determined in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, as mentioned above.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics Software for Windows, Version 26.0. (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), or MedCalc Statistical Software version 18 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Numerical results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. Continuous variables in the survivor and non-survivor groups were compared using the independent t-test (parametric values), or Mann–Whitney U test (non-parametric values), as appropriate. The chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. In all analyses, a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the prognostic function of baseline NGAL levels for predicting ICU mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine ICU mortality. The ROC curve analysis was used to identify the optimal cut-off values of NGAL in BAL and serum according to the Youden index. ICU mortality was analyzed using a Kaplan–Meier curve according to baseline NGAL levels in serum and BAL. In Supplementary Fig. 1, BAL (A) and serum (B) NGAL levels were expressed as fold increases in NGAL levels (each value/mean of control).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This single-center, retrospective cohort study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (PNUYH) (05-2019-185). Informed consent was waived by the PNUYH IRB because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 110 patients with ARDS were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: ICU survivors, 72 (65.5%) and non-survivors, 38 (34.5%). Age, sex, body mass index, lung injury score, and initial PaO2/FiO2 ratio did not show any significant differences between the two groups (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the causes of ARDS between the two groups. In addition, the use of vasopressors, the application of ECMO, and the levels of CRP and creatinine at the time of hospitalization were not significantly different between the two groups. The initial SOFA and APACHE II scores were significantly higher in the non-survivors than in the survivors (SOFA 9.9 vs. 12.5, p < 0.001; APACHE II 18.0 vs. 21.8, p = 0.011). In terms of respiratory support, there was no significant difference in median ventilator duration (13.5 vs 15 days, p = 0.578). In addition, there was no significant difference in the median ECMO duration between the two groups (7 vs. 8 days, p = 0.962). However, the median driving pressure on days 1 and 7 was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (day 1: 24 vs. 26, p = 0.006; day 7: 22 vs. 24, p = 0.006). The requirement for RRT during treatment was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (12.5% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.033).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics according to intensive care units mortality.

Survivor (n = 72) Death (n = 38) p
Age, year 58.9 ± 17.0 65.0 ± 13.5 0.062
Elderly (≥ 65 years) 29 (40.3) 20 (52.6) 0.215
Male 38 (52.8) 26 (68.4) 0.114
BMI, kg/m2 23.0 ± 4.9 22.6 ± 3.7 0.684
SOFA 9.9 ± 2.9 12.5 ± 1.9 < 0.001
APACHE II 18.0 ± 6.5 21.8 ± 7.8 0.011
LIS 3.4 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.3 0.239
PF ratio 117.7 ± 58.0 107.2 ± 44.5 0.331
Cause of ARDS 0.535
Pneumonia 63 (87.5) 33 (86.8)
Non-pulmonary sepsis 3 (4.2) 0
ILD 5 (6.9) 4 (10.5)
Other 1 (1.4) 1 (2.6)
Initial vasopressor use 55 (76.4) 33 (86.8) 0.192
CRRT during treatment 9 (12.5) 11 (28.9) 0.033
ECMO use 44 (61.1) 19 (50.0) 0.263
CRP 17.8 ± 12.1 18.3 ± 12.1 0.842
Creatinine, mg/dL 1.1 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.6 0.493
MV durationa 13.5 (7–25.3) 15 (7–30.0) 0.578
ECMO durationa 7 (4–16.5) 8 (0.8–20.5) 0.962
ICU duration 24.9 ± 24.0 23.1 ± 18.8 0.690
Driving pressure
Day 1a 24 (20–28) 26 (24–30) 0.006
Day 7a 22 (19–24) 24 (22–27.3) 0.006

BMI body mass index, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, LIS lung injury scores, PF ratio PaO2/FiO2 ratio, ARDS adult respiratory distress syndrome, ILD interstitial lung disease, ECMO C-reactive protein, MV mechanical ventilator, ICU intensive care unit.

aData are presented as median (interquartile range). Other data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or N (%).

NGAL and inflammatory cytokines

Baseline NGAL levels were significantly higher in ARDS patients than in healthy controls (n = 5) (serum 25 vs. 214 ng/mL, p = 0.023; BAL 90 vs. 211 ng/mL, p = 0.026, Fig. 2A,E). In ARDS, baseline NGAL levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (serum 184 vs. 247.5 ng/mL, p < 0.001; BAL 130 vs. 240 ng/mL, p = 0.021) (Fig. 2B,F). IL-1β and TNF-α (pg/mL) in BAL were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (p < 0.001, p = 0.011; Fig. 2C,D). However, there were no significant differences in serum TNF-α and IL-1β levels between the two groups (Fig. 2G,H).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

NGAL and inflammatory markers. Data presented as mean ± se. BAL specimens were collected at baseline from 62 patients (35 survivors and non-survivors 27) and on day 7 from 55 patients (31 survivors and non-survivors 24). BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, NGAL neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, TNF tumor necrosis factor, IL interleukin. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

The difference in BAL NGAL values from baseline to day 7 was higher in survivors compared to non-survivors. In the survivors, the BAL NGAL value decreased from baseline to day 7 as median − 26, and in non-survivors, the value increased from baseline to day 7 as median 0.5 (p = 0.002). Figure 3 shows the changes in BAL NGAL at baseline and day 7 in each group. Otherwise, there were no significant differences in serial changes in serum NGAL levels between the two groups.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

NGAL level of baseline and day 7 in bronchoalveolar lavage. A paired t-test was used to compare baseline BAL NGAL and day 7 BAL NGAL [(A) survivors (B) non-survivors]. BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, NGAL Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.

Correlation of NGAL level with severity of ARDS and parameters of mechanical ventilation

Baseline NGAL levels were significantly correlated with the initial SOFA score (BAL r = 0.274, p = 0.031, serum; r = 0.231, p = 0.015). In addition, these levels were inversely correlated with 28 VFDs (serum r = − 0.296, p = 0.002, BAL r = − 0.250, p = 0.050). In line with this, day 7 NGAL was significantly associated with specific parameters of mechanical ventilation, such as day 7 driving pressure (serum r = 0.388, p < 0.001, BAL r = 0.702, p < 0.001), and 28 VFDs (serum r = − 0.298, p = 0.002, BAL r = − 0.297, p = 0.028).

NGAL and prediction of ICU mortality

ROC curves of the association of NGAL and clinical markers with ICU mortality are shown in Fig. 4. At baseline, BAL NGAL (area under the curve (AUC) 0.768, 95% CI 0.643–0.866, p < 0.001), and serum NGAL (AUC 0.747, 95% CI 0.621–0.849, p < 0.001) levels showed fair predictive power, comparable to the SOFA scores (AUC 0.684, 95% CI 0.554–0.796, p = 0.007). However, APACHE II scores did not significantly predict ICU mortality (AUC 0.546, 95% CI 0.414–0.673, p = 0.543).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Receiver operating characteristic curve for intensive care unit mortality. At baseline, BAL NGAL (AUC 0.768, 95% CI 0.643–0.866, p < 0.001) and serum NGAL (AUC 0.747, 95% CI 0.621–0.849, p < 0.001) levels showed fair predictive power. SOFA score (AUC 0.684, 95% CI 0.554–0.796, p = 0.007) also showed significant predictive power. Baseline NGAL levels showed comparable predicted power compared to SOFA scores (serum P = 0.463, BAL p = 0.247). In addition, serum NGAL showed a predicted power comparable to that of BAL NGAL (p = 0.758). AUC area under the curve, BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, NGAL neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment.

Factors associated with ICU mortality

The Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the risk factors for ICU mortality. With the maximum Youden index as the cut-off point, we obtained a cut-off value of 130 ng/mL for the BAL NGAL, and 240 ng/mL for the serum NGAL. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, RRT application during treatment (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.47–7.10, p = 0.003), and high serum NGAL (> 240 ng/mL) (HR 5.39, 95% CI 2.67–10.85, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with ICU mortality (Table 2). However, high BAL NGAL (> 130 ng/mL) was significantly associated with ICU mortality only in univariate Cox regression analysis (Table 3). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, a higher baseline BAL NGAL level (> 130 ng/mL) was significantly associated with higher ICU mortality (χ2 = 18.20, p < 0.001, Fig. 5A). In addition, a higher baseline serum NGAL level (> 240 ng/mL) was significantly associated with higher ICU mortality (χ2 = 28.55, p < 0.001, Fig. 5B).

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis on serum NGAL for ICU mortality.

Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
RRT during treatment 2.59 (1.26–5.32) 0.010 3.24 (1.47–7.10) 0.003
High serum NGAL (> 240 ng/ml) 4.13 (2.11–8.07) < 0.001 5.39 (2.67–10.85) < 0.001
Age 1.02 (1.00–1.05) 0.053
SOFA 1.19 (1.05–1.35) 0.008
APACHE II 1.05 (1.00–1.09) 0.041

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, RRT renal replacement therapy, NGAL neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II.

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis on BAL NGAL for ICU mortality.

Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
RRT during treatment 2.59 (1.26–5.32) 0.010 2.76 (1.04–7.36) 0.043
High BAL NGAL (> 130 ng/ml) 42.57 (1.62–1120.0) 0.025
Age 1.02 (1.00–1.05) 0.053
SOFA 1.19 (1.05–1.35) 0.008
APACHE II 1.05 (1.00–1.09) 0.041

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, RRT renal replacement therapy, NGAL neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Kaplan Meier analysis for intensive care unit mortality. Patients with higher baseline BAL (A) or serum NGAL levels (B) showed a high mortality. BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, NGAL Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.

Discussion

In this study, baseline BAL and serum NGAL levels were strongly and independently predictive of early outcomes in ARDS patients. They were significantly correlated with the initial SOFA score in patients with ARDS. ICU mortality in patients increased significantly, concurrent with the fold increase in NGAL levels compared to the controls (Supplement 1). These findings indicate that baseline NGAL levels in serum and BAL have potential as prognostic markers for ARDS. Furthermore, day 7 NGAL levels were associated with driving pressure and VFDs. The change in NGAL levels could be a novel biomarker that predicts potential alveolar epithelial injury by ARDS treatment.

Clinically, early recognition and grading of ARDS is a critical issue1719. ARDS may be underestimated in clinical practice, and lack of awareness may preclude the high possibility of lung protection in the early phase of ARDS17. In this context, NGAL can be useful in the early identification of patients at risk, and in distinguishing patient groups for early treatment and the implementation of preventive strategies. In addition, it has the advantage of being relatively easy to measure in the emergency department, compared to scoring systems such as SOFA.

Recently, blood and urine NGAL levels have been used as an AKI biomarker, since they have an increased expression in kidney tissue after kidney ischemia20. However, renal impairment is a common complication in ARDS, which may confound whether serum NGAL levels reflect lung or renal tubular injury21,22. In this situation, BAL NGAL may more specifically reflect an origin from the lungs, as compared to serum, as BAL fluid shows a more definite estimation of lung damage, such as damage to bronchial epithelial cells or alveolar type II pnemocytes10. This raises the issue about the origin of BAL NGAL. Serum NGAL can leak into the alveolar space, and not necessarily through activated neutrophil, damaged alveolar, or endothelial cells. However, the correlation between BAL and serum NGAL was not significant (r = 0.224, p = 0.068), suggesting that BAL does not merely reflect the blood levels.

In this study, NGAL levels on day 7 were associated with VFDs and driving pressure. This is in line with previous studies showing a correlation between NGAL expression and the level of lung injury in VILI animal models11,12. Clinically, many ARDS patients remain ventilator-dependent after recovery, and VILI may contribute to mortality and morbidity in patients with ARDS23. Serial measurements of NGAL during the clinical course of ARDS may assist in assessing the adequacy of lung protective strategies against continued alveolar epithelial injury during ARDS treatment. Further, prospective studies are required to confirm our findings that indicate NGAL as a potential biomarker.

This study had several limitations that include its retrospective design and small sample size. This population consisted mostly of severe ARDS patients; therefore, it may be difficult to generalize our finding to all ARDS patients, including mild cases. In addition, BAL NGAL testing was not performed in some patients: those who did not undergo bronchoscopy because of hemodynamic instability at baseline; who did not consent to sample collections; or patients with insufficient samples. Although we excluded unsatisfactory samples using general clinical criteria, there is the risk of potential bias due to sampling error. Because total protein and NGAL in BAL showed the same increasing pattern in a previous study, we did not check the ratio of NGAL according to total protein or albumin12.

Since lung-kidney interactions play a major role in critically ill patients, there is a limitation to explaining the relevance of NGAL and ARDS without including kidney function. An increase in serum NGAL in ARDS may mean the development of organ failure such as AKI. However, we excluded patients who initially presented with AKI so as to evaluate the NGAL from a respiratory origin. Also, we checked the dynamic profile of NGAL through repeated measurements of both BAL and serum, which showed a unique correlation between lung injury and NGAL. Furthermore, NGAL predicted the prognosis of ARDS well, regardless of AKI development during treatment (Supplements 2 and 3). The novel role of NGAL in lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation using the BAL fluid of ARDS has been suggested. The discovery of this biomarker may provide a change in treatment and prediction of the prognosis in ARDS as individual approach to the ARDS. Further prospective studies are required to validate the role of NGAL as a biomarker of ARDS.

Conclusions

The NGAL levels at baseline in serum and BAL were strongly associated with early mortality in patients with ARDS. This association persisted after adjusting for other factors, including age, severity, and RRT. Furthermore, the NGAL level at 7 days was associated with VFDs and driving pressure. Our findings suggest that the NGAL concentration may be a useful biomarker for risk stratification of ARDS, and may provide additional information on VILI in these patients. Further mechanistic studies are required to elucidate the role of NGAL in ARDS.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Legends. (15.5KB, docx)

Abbreviations

ABGA

Arterial blood gas analysis

AKI

Acute kidney injury

APACHE

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation

ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BAL

Bronchoalveolar lavage

BMI

Body mass index

CRP

C-reactive protein

ECMO

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

eGFR

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ICU

Intensive care unit

IL

Interleukin

LIS

Lung injury score

NGAL

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

ROC

Receiver operating characteristic

RRT

Renal replacement therapy

SOFA

Sequential organ failure assessment

SST

Serum separate test

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor

VFD

Ventilator-free days

VILI

Ventilator-induced lung injury

Author contributions

Study concept and design: Y.H.J., S.E.J. Acquisition of data: Y.H.J., K.T.H. Analysis and interpretation of data: Y.H.J., S.E.J. Writing of the manuscript: Y.H.J., S.E.J., C.W.H. Critical revision of the manuscript: C.W.H., J.J.H., J.D.S., K.Y.S. Support for data collection: Y.H.J., S.E.J. Approval of final manuscript and agreement of submission: all authors.

Funding

This study was supported by the Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology (30-2019-014), Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-12117-4.

References

  • 1.Spadaro S, et al. Biomarkers for acute respiratory distress syndrome and prospects for personalised medicine. J. Inflamm. (Lond.). 2019;16:1. doi: 10.1186/s12950-018-0202-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lb W, Ma M. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;307:2526–2533. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ranieri VM, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–2533. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van der Zee P, Rietdijk W, Somhorst P, Endeman H, Gommers D. A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality. Crit. Care (London, England) 2020;24:243. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02913-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huber W, et al. Prediction of outcome in patients with ARDS: A prospective cohort study comparing ARDS-definitions and other ARDS-associated parameters, ratios and scores at intubation and over time. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0232720–e0232720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Santa Cruz A, et al. Interleukin-6 is a biomarker for the development of fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pneumonia. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:613422. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.613422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu WK, et al. Angiopoietin-2 outperforms other endothelial biomarkers associated with severe acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis and respiratory failure. Crit. Care (London, England) 2021;25:48. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03474-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu C, Wang F, Cui L, Zhou J, Xu Z. Diagnostic value of serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, interleukin-6 and anti-citrullinated alpha-enolase peptide 1 for lower respiratory tract infections. Clin. Biochem. 2020;75:30–34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen JJ, Lee TH, Lee CC, Chang CH. Using lipocalin as a prognostic biomarker in acute kidney injury. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2021 doi: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1917384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cowland JB, Sorensen OE, Sehested M, Borregaard N. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is up-regulated in human epithelial cells by IL-1 beta, but not by TNF-alpha. J. Immunol. 2003;171:6630–6639. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.12.6630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cho WH, et al. Ginsenoside ameliorated ventilator-induced lung injury in rats. J. Intensive Care. 2020;8:89. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00509-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xiao R, Chen R. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a potential novel biomarker for ventilator-associated lung injury. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;15:3535–3540. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim JW, et al. Usefulness of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentration for predicting the severity and mortality of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2016;462:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang J, et al. Plasma YKL-40 and NGAL are useful in distinguishing ACO from asthma and COPD. Respir. Res. 2018;19:47. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0755-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lumley A, et al. The role of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in the detection of blast lung injury in a military population. J. Crit. Care. 2018;43:312–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury Kidney Int. Suppl. 2012;2(Suppl 1):8. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rubenfeld GD, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1685–1693. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Candelaria de Haro IM-L, Eva T, Antonio A. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: Prevention and early recognition. Ann. Intensive Care. 2013;3:11–11. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Levitt JE, Matthay MA. Clinical review: Early treatment of acute lung injury—Paradigm shift toward prevention and treatment prior to respiratory failure. Crit. Care. 2012;16:223. doi: 10.1186/cc11144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Soni SS, et al. NGAL: A biomarker of acute kidney injury and other systemic conditions. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2010;42:141–150. doi: 10.1007/s11255-009-9608-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yeo HJ, Kim YS, Kim D, Cho ERCAWH. Risk factors for complete recovery of adults after weaning from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure: An analysis from adult patients in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. J. Intensive Care. 2020;8:64. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00480-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hepokoski MEJ, Baron RM, Crotty-Alexander LE, Fuster MM, Beitler JR, Malhotra A, Singh P. Ventilator-induced lung injury increases expression of endothelial inflammatory mediators in the kidney. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2017;312:F654–F660. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00523.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Beitler JR, Malhotra A, Thompson BT. Ventilator-induced lung injury. Clin. Chest Med. 2016;37:633–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Legends. (15.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES