Skip to main content
Gut and Liver logoLink to Gut and Liver
. 2022 May 3;16(3):465–473. doi: 10.5009/gnl210009

Increased Risk of Cancer after Cholecystectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea including 123,295 Patients

Yoon Jin Choi 1, Eun Hyo Jin 2, Joo Hyun Lim 2, Cheol Min Shin 3, Nayoung Kim 3,4, Kyungdo Han 5,, Dong Ho Lee 3,4,
PMCID: PMC9099388  PMID: 35502586

Abstract

Background/Aims

Contradictory findings on the association between cholecystectomy and cancer have been reported. We aimed to investigate the risk of all types of cancers or site-specific cancers in patients who underwent cholecystectomy using a nationwide dataset.

Methods

Subjects who underwent cholecystectomy from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014, who were older than 20 years and who underwent an initial baseline health check-up within 2 years were enrolled. Those who were diagnosed with any type of cancer before the enrollment or within 1 year after enrollment were excluded. Ultimately, patients (n=123,295) who underwent cholecystectomy and age/sex matched population (n=123,295) were identified from the database of the Korean National Health Insurance Service. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for cancer were estimated, and Cox regression analysis was performed.

Results

The incidence of cancer in the cholecystectomy group was 9.56 per 1,000 person-years and that in the control group was 7.95 per 1,000 person-years. Patients who underwent cholecystectomy showed an increased risk of total cancer (adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.24; p<0.001), particularly leukemia and malignancies of the colon, liver, pancreas, biliary tract, thyroid, pharynx, and oral cavity. In the subgroup analysis according to sex, the risk of developing cancers in the pancreas, biliary tract, thyroid, lungs and stomach was higher in men than in women.

Conclusions

Physicians should pay more attention to the possibility of the occurrence of secondary cancers among patients who undergo cholecystectomy.

Keywords: Neoplasms, Cholecystectomy, Gallbladder, Incidence

INTRODUCTION

Cholecystectomy is the standard surgical procedure for gallstone removal from symptomatic patients.1 The recent adoption of the laparoscopic approach for cholecystectomy has made cholecystectomy one of the most commonly performed operations worldwide. A total of 750,000 cholecystectomies are performed annually in the United States.2 Western lifestyles and diets can contribute to the increase in the prevalence of gallstones.3

Gallbladder removal can lead to a more continuous flow of bile juice to the small bowel or colon. Cholecystectomy promotes the negative feedback of bile acid production from the liver.4 The long-term medical consequences of cholecystectomy are not completely elucidated. An increasing body of literature has proposed that cholecystectomy may increase the risk of developing cancers, particularly neoplasm of the colon5 and pancreas.6 However, studies about the association between cholecystectomy and colon cancers have shown inconsistent findings. The reasons for such conflicting findings are the relatively small number of participants and short follow-up periods. In this study, we aimed to determine whether cholecystectomy is related to an increased risk of cancers of any site. We used a nationwide population-based registry dataset from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), which enabled us to gain sufficient statistical power.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Database

This retrospective cohort study relied on data from the Korean NHIS database. Approximately 97% of the Korean population is registered with the Korean NHIS, which is a single public health insurance program managed by the Korean government. The NHIS database contains beneficiary information, the eligibility database (age, sex, socioeconomic variables, type of eligibility, and income level), medical treatment database (based on the medical bills that were claimed by medical service providers for their medical expenses), and health examination database (blood pressure, height, weight, waist circumference, and values of serum fasting glucose and total cholesterol [mg/dL] and questionnaires on lifestyle and behavior).

Moreover, Korean researchers can use the NHIS database after approval by the official review committee. The present study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (IRB number: X-2003/601-904). Informed consent was waived because the study was based on routinely collected medical claims data.

2. Study population

The subjects who had undergone cholecystectomy from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2014, who were older than 20 years and who had undergone an initial baseline health check-up within 2 years were enrolled in the study. The study population was followed until December 31, 2017 (end of the follow-up period) or censored at any cancer. Cholecystectomy operations were identified using corresponding insurance claims codes (Q7380). A total of 123,295 control subjects were 1:1 matched for age and sex with the 123,925 subjects who underwent cholecystectomy. The matched control participants were evaluated at the same time as each cholecystectomy group participant (index date). In both groups, patients with a diagnosis code for cancer before the index date were omitted to exclude subjects with a history of any cancer. Subjects who were diagnosed with cancers within 1 year after enrollment were excluded (1-year lag period).

Patients with cancer were diagnosed by medical doctors using specific international classification of disease (ICD)-10 codes and intractable and rare diseases (IRDs) codes: oral cavity (ICD-10 C00-C14), larynx (C32), esophagus (C15), stomach (C16), colon (C18), rectum (C19-20), liver (C22), biliary tract (C24), pancreas (C25), lung (C33-34), skin (C43), breast (C50), cervix uteri (C53), corpus uteri (C54), ovary (C56), prostate (C61), testis (C62), kidney (C64), bladder (C67), central nervous system (C70-72), thyroid (C73), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (C82-86), multiple myeloma (C90), and leukemia (C91-95).

3. Covariates

Age groups were classified using 10-year intervals, with a total of seven designated age groups. Lifestyle factors, such as smoking status or body mass index, were obtained from medical check-up data. These factors were identified based on the data available in the first 2-year data before surgery. Diabetes mellitus was defined based on claim for diabetes (E11-E14 and anti-diabetes medication) or fasting plasma glucose level ≥126 mg/dL. Hypertension was defined as claim for hypertension (I10-I15 and antihypertensive medication) or systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg. Dyslipidemia was defined based on at least one claim per year for E78 or lipid-lowering medication. We also analyzed the characteristics of the subjects undergoing cholecystectomy stratified according to sex.

4. Statistical analyses

We presented the basic characteristics of the study population using descriptive statistics. The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to compare age and comorbidities between the cholecystectomy and control groups as categorical variables. The incidence of cancer between the two groups was calculated per 1,000 person-years. We analyzed the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of cancer after cholecystectomy, and the Cox regression analysis was subsequently performed. The HR was adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. We also analyzed the characteristics of the subjects undergoing cholecystectomy stratified according to age group and sex. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS version 9.4 software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and results with two-sided p-values of <0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

1. Characteristics of the study population

From the 471,602 cases undergoing cholecystectomy during 2007 to 2014, those who have not underwent the baseline health check-up within 2 years before the surgery (n=323,214), those who were <20 years old (n=28) and those who were diagnosed with any type of cancer during the preceding years (n=21,999) were excluded. To clarify the temporal relationship, 3,066 patients who were diagnosed with cancers within 1 year after cholecystectomy were excluded. Finally, a total of 123,295 patients who underwent cholecystectomy and 123,295 matched comparison subjects were included in the analysis (Fig. 1). Their mean age was 52.79±13.21 years, and 54.02% of the study population was male. The cholecystectomy group had a lower proportion of current smokers and higher body mass index than the control group. The cholecystectomy group included a higher proportion of individuals with hypertension, diabetes mellitus or dyslipidemia than the control group (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of the study population.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants from the Korean National Health Insurance Service

Variable Healthy control
(n=123,295)
Cholecystectomized patients
(n=123,295)
p-value
Age, mean±SD, yr 52.79±13.21 52.79±13.21 NS
Age group, No. (%), yr NS
20–29 3,874 (3.14) 3,874 (3.14)
30–39 16,208 (13.15) 16,208 (13.15)
40–49 30,478 (24.72) 30,478 (24.72)
50–59 33,482 (27.16) 33,482 (27.16)
60–69 23,481 (19.04) 23,481(19.04)
70–79 13,509 (10.96) 13,509 (10.96)
≥80 2,263 (1.84) 2,263 (1.84)
Male sex, No. (%) 66,600 (54.02) 66,600 (54.02) NS
BMI, mean±SD, kg/m2 23.91±3.17 24.56±3.34 <0.001
Glucose, mean±SD, mg/dL 99.62±24.02 100.87±24.98 <0.001
Diabetes, No (%) 14,331 (11.62) 18,888 (15.32) <0.001
Smoking status, No. (%) <0.001
Non 75,968 (61.61) 75,309 (61.08)
Ex-smoker 20,065 (16.27) 22,081 (17.91)
Current 27,262 (22.11) 25,905 (21.01)

BMI, body mass index; NS, not significant.

2. Cancer risk in patients who underwent cholecystectomy relative to the matched control group

In the total study population, the mean follow-up period after a 1-year lag of cholecystectomy was 4.59±2.44 years (4.58±2.44 years for the cholecystectomy group and 4.61±2.44 years for the control group). The maximum follow-up interval after cholecystectomy was 7 years.

The incidence of total combined cancers in the cholecystectomy group was 9.56 per 1,000 person-years and that in the control group was 7.95 per 1,000 person-years. The adjusted HR (aHR) for total combined cancers in the cholecystectomy group versus the control group was 1.19 (95% CI, 1.15 to 1.24; p<0.001) (Table 2, Fig. 2).

Table 2.

Incidences and Adjusted Hazard Ratios of All 23 Cancers and Site-Specific Cancers

Cancer type Cholecystectomy No. Event Duration* IR HR (95% CI)
All-site cancer No 123,295 4,512 567,857 7.95 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 5,397 564,814 9.56 1.19 (1.15–1.24)
Oral cavity No 123,295 58 578,377 0.10 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 99 577,830 0.17 1.76 (1.27–2.43)
Larynx No 123,295 28 578,459 0.05 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 41 577,937 0.07 1.50 (0.92–2.43)
Esophagus No 123,295 71 578,411 0.12 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 61 577,928 0.11 0.93 (0.66–1.31)
Stomach No 123,295 724 576,758 1.26 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 800 575,910 1.39 1.10 (0.99–1.22)
Colon No 123,295 690 576,914 1.20 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 777 576,026 1.35 1.11 (1.00–1.23)
Rectum No 123,295 313 577,697 0.54 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 301 577,251 0.52 0.94 (0.81–1.11)
Liver No 123,295 456 577,835 0.79 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 747 576,759 1.30 1.60 (1.42–1.80)
Biliary tracks No 123,295 180 578,304 0.31 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 273 577,601 0.47 1.50 (1.24–1.82)
Pancreas No 123,295 376 577,945 0.65 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 469 577,234 0.81 1.22 (1.07–1.40)
Lung No 123,295 658 577,578 1.14 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 707 576,993 1.23 1.13 (1.02–1.26)
Skin No 123,295 13 578,502 0.02 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 24 578,003 0.04 1.77 (0.90–3.48)
Breast No 56,695 362 264,731 1.37 1 (reference)
Yes 56,695 422 264,569 1.60 1.14 (0.99–1.31)
Cervix uteri No 56,695 79 265,535 0.30 1 (reference)
Yes 56,695 67 265,542 0.25 0.84 (0.60–1.16)
Corpus uteri No 56,695 57 265,564 0.21 1 (reference)
Yes 56,695 62 265,541 0.23 1.00 (0.69–1.44)
Ovary No 56,695 100 265,528 0.38 1 (reference)
Yes 56,695 87 265,542 0.33 0.85 (0.63–1.13)
Prostate No 66,600 444 311,753 1.42 1 (reference)
Yes 66,600 477 311,236 1.53 1.05 (0.92–1.20)
Testes No 66,600 17 312,767 0.05 1 (reference)
Yes 66,600 8 312,336 0.03 0.44 (0.19–1.03)
Kidney No 123,295 122 578,252 0.21 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 103 577,814 0.18 0.80 (0.62–1.04)
Bladder No 123,295 158 578,136 0.27 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 178 577,670 0.31 1.13 (0.91–1.40)
CNS No 123,295 80 578,440 0.14 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 75 577,940 0.13 0.95 (0.69–1.30)
Thyroid No 123,295 537 576,641 0.93 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 813 575,237 1.41 1.47 (1.31–1.64)
NHL No 123,295 106 578,293 0.18 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 110 577,821 0.19 1.02 (0.78–1.33)
MM No 123,295 48 578,448 0.08 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 59 577,968 0.10 1.21 (0.82–1.77)
Leukemia No 123,295 64 578,430 0.11 1 (reference)
Yes 123,295 96 577,914 0.17 1.46 (1.06–2.01)

IR, incidence rate; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma.

*Person-years; †Per 1,000 person-years; ‡Adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, body mass index, and current smoking.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Hazard ratios for the associations of cholecystectomy with all sites of cancers and site-specific cancers.

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma.

When we evaluated the risk for intestinal cancers according to the removal of the gallbladder or not, people who underwent cholecystectomy had an increased HR for developing malignancy in the colon, liver, pancreas and biliary tracks (colon cancer aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.23; liver cancer aHR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.80; pancreatic cancer aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.40; and biliary tract cancer aHR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.82). No significant associations were found between cholecystectomy and esophageal, gastric or rectal cancer (esophageal cancer aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.31; gastric cancer aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.22; and rectal cancer aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.11).

With regard to non-gastrointestinal cancers, the risks for lung cancer, thyroid cancer, oral cancer and leukemia were increased among those who underwent cholecystectomy compared with non-cholecystectomized patients (lung cancer aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.26; thyroid cancer aHR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.64; oral cancer aHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.43; and leukemia aHR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.01). Cancers in the breast, uterine cervix and corpus, prostate, larynx, testes, kidney, bladder, nerves and skin, lymphoma and multiple myeloma did not show significant associations with cholecystectomy (Fig. 2).

In order to secure a longer follow-up period, only those who underwent cholecystectomy between 2007 and 2009 were analyzed again. The mean follow-up period after a 1-year lag of cholecystectomy was 7.86±1.69 years. Despite the subgroup analysis, a history of cholecystectomy was associated with a similar trend in the risk of cancers (Supplementary Table 1).

3. Subgroup analysis by sex

According to sex, we calculated the aHR for cancers after cholecystectomy compared with the matched non-cholecystectomy group (Table 3). The male and female patients who underwent cholecystectomy showed aHR values of total combined cancers of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.26) and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.26), respectively, compared with each control group.

Table 3.

Incidences and Adjusted Hazard Ratios According to Sex

Cancer type Cholecystectomy Male (n=66,600) Female (n=56,695)
Event Duration* IR HR (95% CI) Event Duration* IR HR (95% CI)
All-site cancer No 2,691 306,919 8.77 1 (reference) 1,821 260,938 6.98 1 (reference)
Yes 3,209 304,915 10.52 1.20 (1.14–1.26) 2,188 259,899 8.42 1.18 (1.11–1.26)
Oral cavity No 42 312,687 0.13 1 (reference) 16 265,691 0.06 1 (reference)
Yes 67 312,207 0.21 1.69 (1.14–2.49) 32 265,623 0.12 1.94 (1.06–3.55)
Larynx No 26 312,725 0.08 1 (reference) 2 265,734 0.01 1 (reference)
Yes 41 312,238 0.13 1.61 (0.98–2.65) 0 265,699 0.00 0 (0.00–0.00)
Esophagus No 68 312,679 0.22 1 (reference) 3 265,732 0.01 1 (reference)
Yes 53 312,244 0.17 0.84 (0.59–1.21) 8 265,684 0.03 2.85 (0.75–10.79)
Stomach No 524 311,495 1.68 1 (reference) 200 265,264 0.75 1 (reference)
Yes 615 310,686 1.98 1.17 (1.04–1.32) 185 265,225 0.70 0.92 (0.75–1.13)
Colon No 414 311,841 1.33 1 (reference) 276 265,072 1.04 1 (reference)
Yes 476 311,050 1.53 1.13 (0.99–1.29) 301 264,976 1.14 1.07 (0.91–1.26)
Rectum No 222 312,195 0.71 1 (reference) 91 265,501 0.34 1 (reference)
Yes 213 311,781 0.68 0.93 (0.77–1.13) 88 265,470 0.33 0.96 (0.72–1.30)
Liver No 333 312,297 1.07 1 (reference) 123 265,538 0.46 1 (reference)
Yes 542 311,390 1.74 1.59 (1.39–1.83) 205 265,369 0.77 1.63 (1.30–2.04)
Biliary track No 106 312,662 0.34 1 (reference) 74 265,643 0.28 1 (reference)
Yes 175 312,056 0.56 1.65 (1.30–2.11) 98 265,545 0.37 1.30 (0.96–1.75)
Pancreas No 238 312,415 0.76 1 (reference) 138 265,530 0.52 1 (reference)
Yes 315 311,806 1.01 1.31 (1.10–1.55) 154 265,428 0.58 1.09 (0.86–1.37)
Lung No 490 312,132 1.57 1 (reference) 168 265,447 0.63 1 (reference)
Yes 540 311,582 1.73 1.19 (1.05–1.34) 167 265,412 0.63 0.98 (0.79–1.22)
Skin No 8 312,784 0.03 1 (reference) 5 265,718 0.02 1 (reference)
Yes 13 312,323 0.04 1.61 (0.66–3.90) 11 265,680 0.04 2.05 (0.71–5.94)
Kidney No 92 312,596 0.29 1 (reference) 30 265,657 0.11 1 (reference)
Yes 71 312,205 0.23 0.73 (0.54–1.00) 32 265,609 0.12 1.01 (0.61–1.67)
Bladder No 125 312,458 0.40 1 (reference) 33 265,677 0.12 1 (reference)
Yes 145 312,035 0.46 1.17 (0.92–1.49) 33 265,635 0.12 0.98 (0.61–1.60)
CNS No 50 312,742 0.16 1 (reference) 30 265,698 0.11 1 (reference)
Yes 39 312,305 0.12 0.83 (0.54–1.26) 36 265,634 0.14 1.14 (0.70–1.86)
Thyroid No 141 312,364 0.45 1 (reference) 396 264,276 1.50 1 (reference)
Yes 238 311,589 0.76 1.63 (1.33–2.02) 575 263,648 2.18 1.41 (1.24–1.61)
NHL No 62 312,647 0.20 1 (reference) 44 265,645 0.17 1 (reference)
Yes 68 312,209 0.22 1.09 (0.77–1.54) 42 265,612 0.16 0.94 (0.61–1.44)
MM No 30 312,747 0.10 1 (reference) 18 265,702 0.07 1 (reference)
Yes 44 312,296 0.14 1.43 (0.89–2.28) 15 265,672 0.06 0.82 (0.41–1.64)
Leukemia No 36 312,736 0.12 1 (reference) 28 265,694 0.11 1 (reference)
Yes 56 312,265 0.18 1.51 (0.99–2.30) 40 265,649 0.15 1.41 (0.87–2.30)

IR, incidence rate; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma.

*Person-years; †Per 1,000 person-years; ‡Adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, body mass index, and current smoking.

When the risk was evaluated according to specific sites, cancers in the liver, oral cavity and thyroid remained positively associated with cholecystectomy. However, the excessive risks for the development of cancers in the pancreas, biliary tract and lung among cholecystectomized persons were observed only in men, not in women (Table 3).

When the study populations were divided according to sex, no association was found between cholecystectomy and increased risk for leukemia, colon or rectal cancer regardless of sex. However, men showed an excessive risk for stomach cancer after cholecystectomy compared with men who did not undergo cholecystectomy (aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.32).

DISCUSSION

This is one of the largest population-based cohort studies to examine the association between cholecystectomy and 24 types of cancers. The study results indicated that the incidence of cancer was higher in subjects who underwent cholecystectomy than those in the aged- and sex-matched control group (aHR, 1.19). Those who underwent cholecystectomy were likely to develop cancers in the colon, liver, pancreas, biliary tracts, oral cavity, thyroid and lung. Moreover, the excessive risk for these cancers was observed mostly in men than in women.

The following is the basis for research on the change in the risk of gastrointestinal cancer after cholecystectomy. Cholecystectomy changes bile flow7 and increases bile salt exposure8 to intestine. After cholecystectomy, 100% of the hepatic bile enters the duodenum.9 During the enterohepatic circulation, anaerobic bacteria promote 7α-dehydroxylation of hydrophilic primary bile acids converting them into hydrophobic secondary bile acids, deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid. Depending on the concentration, hydrophobic secondary bile acids can cause cholestasis or encourage apoptosis and DNA damage.10 Moreover, deoxycholic acid has carcinogenic and mutagenic properties.11,12

First, studies on the relationship between cholecystectomy and cancer risk have been conducted most frequently in colorectal cancer. Except for some studies,13,14 most researches have reported the consistent findings that cholecystectomy increases the risk of colon cancer, but is not related to the risk of rectal cancer. A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies has recently reported an increased risk for colon cancer up to 30% compared with the non-cholecystectomized group.5 Studies that were previously had published as having no association between cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer also showed similar trends, when colon was divided into colon and rectum.15-17

The reason for this discrepancy in the effect of cholecystectomy even on one organ has been often explained by the reduced amount of bile flow according to increasing distance from the common bile duct. For instance, A Swedish nationwide cohort study showed that the risk remains for adenocarcinoma and carcinoids of the small bowel, and right-sided colon cancer, but not distal bowel cancer.18 This difference might be the expression of molecular and biological differences between colon and rectal cancer.19

According to the bile exposure-theory, the increased bile flow into the duodenum can flow backward to the stomach and esophagus. One large U.S. case-control study including 1 million cancer cases reported that gallstones and cholecystectomy are associated with increased risk for noncardiac gastric cancer but not for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma or gastric cardia adenocarcinoma,15 which are consistent with the results of the present study.

Meanwhile, although the hepatobiliary tract, as well as gastrointestinal systems is part of the digestive system, it is difficult to explain with the increasing bile exposure-hypothesis. The findings of the relationship between cholecystectomy and cancers in the hepatobiliary system are also contradictory.20 Moreover, aside from pancreatic cancers, other cancers have not been investigated thoroughly. A previous U.S. study reported that cholecystectomy is associated with increased risks for pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.15 Some animal studies have reported that secondary bile acids or metabolites may have a carcinogenic effect in the liver,21 and pancreas.22 On the other hand, gallstones are strongly associated with an increased development of extrahepatic cancers.23,24 Given that calculus cholecystitis is the leading cause of cholecystectomy,25 similar epidemiologic features shared by cholelithiasis and neoplasm of biliary tract or liver cancers. Several papers have reported that cholelithiasis itself, not cholecystectomy, increases the risk of cancer,26,27 others showed gallstone was no association with cancer of the cecum or ascending colon.18 Due to the inaccuracy of the operational definition of cholelithiasis using the claimed data, the present study did not analyze the relationship between carrying gallstone and cancer, but (female) sex, old age, and obesity, which are known risk factors for gallstone, were included as covariates.

Besides neoplasms of digestive tract, the present study showed those who underwent cholecystectomy were more likely to develop cancers in the thyroid, lung, oral cavity and pharynx or leukemia in the present study. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the association between cholecystectomy and these cancers.

As other mechanisms of increasing cancer incidence after cholecystectomy, other than direct exposure to bile, is altered metabolic or endocrine pathways. As described previously, bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver and further metabolized by the gut microbiota into secondary bile acids. Bile acid synthesis is under negative feedback control through activation of the nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor in the ileum and liver.28 Bile acids act important signaling molecules in the host. These signaling functions influence lipid and cholesterol metabolism, energy metabolism, immune homeostasis, and intestinal electrolyte balance. Bile acids can also modulate gut microbial composition.29 In a recent study comparing the intestinal microbiota of the three groups of gallstone carriers, cholecystectomy-patients and normal subjects, cholecystectomy but not gallstone carrier status is associated with decreased beta-diversity along with a decrease in beneficial microorganisms and an increase in harmful microorganisms.30

This study has several limitations. Despite additional subgroup analysis, the relatively short follow-up period is a disadvantage. We could not rule out the possibility that the individuals who received cholecystectomy were more eager to undergo health screening than the matched control, leading to more diagnoses of cancers. Although this study used age- and sex-matched control group, confounding factors, such as infection, diet pattern or alcohol consumption, were not included for the control. Similar epidemiologic features shared by cholelithiasis, such as physical inactivity or over-nutrition, may contribute to the positive association between cholecystectomy and an increased development of the certain subtype of cancers. Although several studies have published results showing significant associations even when these variables are corrected,31,32 ultimately, research is needed to find the mechanism.

The strengths of our study include the use of a large data set, which provided us good statistical power to investigate less common cancer sites. Our study also had high data quality because cancer diagnosis was double checked using IRDs codes. The diagnosis must be based on the IRD-defined diagnostic criteria provided by the national health insurance system and reviewed by the corresponding healthcare institution. The present research represents one of the few nationwide studies evaluating the risk for 24 different types of cancers after cholecystectomy with controlling for known common cancer risk factors.

The current study demonstrates an association between cholecystectomy and the subsequent risk of cancers in the colon, liver, pancreas, biliary tracts, thyroid, lung, pharynx and oral cavity and leukemia. The risk of developing cancers in the pancreas, biliary tracts, thyroid, lung and stomach is higher in men than in women. This study may recommend careful observation of other cancers that may develop following cholecystectomy. However, the results of this study require careful interpretation because the follow-up period is short and correction for all possible compounding factors is impossible. Further studies for true mechanism are warranted.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl210009.

gnl-16-3-465-supple.pdf (15.3KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of the Republic of Korea (project number: 2016M3A9F3947027).

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Study design: Y.J.C., D.H.L. Data handling and statistical analysis: K.H. Drafting the manuscript: Y.J.C. Revising a manuscript: E.H.J., J.H.L., C.M.S., N.K. Editing a manuscript: D.H.L. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:276–300. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1289-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1731–1741. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lammert F, Gurusamy K, Ko CW, et al. Gallstones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16024. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pomare EW, Heaton KW. The effect of cholecystectomy on bile salt metabolism. Gut. 1973;14:753–762. doi: 10.1136/gut.14.10.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang Y, Liu H, Li L, et al. Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lin G, Zeng Z, Wang X, et al. Cholecystectomy and risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:59–67. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9856-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ. A meta-analysis of cholecystectomy and risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:130–141. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mahid SS, Jafri NS, Brangers BC, Minor KS, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S. Meta-analysis of cholecystectomy in symptomatic patients with positive hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan results without gallstones. Arch Surg. 2009;144:180–187. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen YK, Yeh JH, Lin CL, et al. Cancer risk in patients with cholelithiasis and after cholecystectomy: a nationwide cohort study. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:923–931. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0846-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kang SH, Kim YH, Roh YH, et al. Gallstone, cholecystectomy and risk of gastric cancer. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2017;21:131–137. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2017.21.3.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Payne CM, Dvorakova K, Garewal H. Bile acids as carcinogens in human gastrointestinal cancers. Mutat Res. 2005;589:47–65. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Payne CM, Dvorak K. Bile acids as endogenous etiologic agents in gastrointestinal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3329–3340. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Friedman GD, Goldhaber MK, Quesenberry CP., Jr Cholecystectomy and large bowel cancer. Lancet. 1987;1:906–908. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92871-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF. Large bowel cancer after cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1988;156:359–362. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80186-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nogueira L, Freedman ND, Engels EA, Warren JL, Castro F, Koshiol J. Gallstones, cholecystectomy, and risk of digestive system cancers. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179:731–739. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Johansen C, Chow WH, Jørgensen T, Mellemkjaer L, Engholm G, Olsen JH. Risk of colorectal cancer and other cancers in patients with gall stones. Gut. 1996;39:439–443. doi: 10.1136/gut.39.3.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Todoroki I, Friedman GD, Slattery ML, Potter JD, Samowitz W. Cholecystectomy and the risk of colon cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:41–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lagergren J, Ye W, Ekbom A. Intestinal cancer after cholecystectomy: is bile involved in carcinogenesis? Gastroenterology. 2001;121:542–547. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.27083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paschke S, Jafarov S, Staib L, et al. Are colon and rectal cancer two different tumor entities? A proposal to abandon the term colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2577. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coats M, Shimi SM. Cholecystectomy and the risk of alimentary tract cancers: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:3679–3693. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cameron RG, Imaida K, Tsuda H, Ito N. Promotive effects of steroids and bile acids on hepatocarcinogenesis initiated by diethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res. 1982;42:2426–2428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ura H, Makino T, Ito S, et al. Combined effects of cholecystectomy and lithocholic acid on pancreatic carcinogenesis of N-nitrosobis(2-hydroxypropyl)amine in Syrian golden hamsters. Cancer Res. 1986;46:4782–4786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hsing AW, Gao YT, Han TQ, et al. Gallstones and the risk of biliary tract cancer: a population-based study in China. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:1577–1582. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ogimoto I, Shibata A, Fukuda K. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research 1997 recommendations: applicability to digestive tract cancer in Japan. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:9–23. doi: 10.1023/A:1008927404027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F, et al. 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0082-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shabanzadeh DM, Sørensen LT, Jørgensen T. Association between screen-detected gallstone disease and cancer in a cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1965–1974. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Gallstone disease is associated with increased mortality in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:508–516. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.10.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Søreide K. Gallstone disease and cancer risk: finding the bug in the system. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1825–1828. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Malagelada JR, Go VL, Summerskill WH, Gamble WS. Bile acid secretion and biliary bile acid composition altered by cholecystectomy. Am J Dig Dis. 1973;18:455–459. doi: 10.1007/BF01076595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Frost F, Kacprowski T, Rühlemann M, et al. Carrying asymptomatic gallstones is not associated with changes in intestinal microbiota composition and diversity but cholecystectomy with significant dysbiosis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:6677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86247-6.475fbfa266654d25ba6d1a4c3a5fb3e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schernhammer ES, Leitzmann MF, Michaud DS, et al. Cholecystectomy and the risk for developing colorectal cancer and distal colorectal adenomas. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:79–83. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shao T, Yang YX. Cholecystectomy and the risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1813–1820. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gnl-16-3-465-supple.pdf (15.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Gut and Liver are provided here courtesy of The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Society of Pancreatobiliary Disease, and the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer

RESOURCES