Abstract
The trajectory from moderate and severe COVID-19 into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) necessitating mechanical ventilation (MV) is a field of active research. We determined serum levels within 24 h of presentation of 20 different sets of mediators (calprotectin, pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, interferons) of patients with COVID-19 at different stages of severity (asymptomatic, moderate, severe and ARDS/MV). The primary endpoint was to define associations with critical illness, and the secondary endpoint was to identify the pathways associated with mortality. Results were validated in serial measurements of mediators among participants of the SAVE-MORE trial. Levels of the proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-8, IL-18, matrix metalloproteinase-9, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-B and calprotectin (S100A8/A9) were significantly higher in patients with ARDS and MV. Levels of the anti-inflammatory IL-1ra and IL-33r were also increased; IL-38 was increased only in asymptomatic patients but significantly decreased in the more severe cases. Multivariate ordinal regression showed that pathways of IL-6, IL-33 and calprotectin were associated with significant probability for worse outcome. Calprotectin was serially increased from baseline among patients who progressed to ARDS and MV. Further research is needed to decipher the significance of these findings compared to other acute-phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) or ferritin, for the prognosis and development of effective treatments.
Keywords: ARDS, COVID-19, cytokines, IL-18, IL33r, IL-38, S100A8/A9
1. Introduction
The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infects human cells by first binding to their surface receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), via its corona spike protein [1], leading to the development of COVID-19 [2,3]. This condition involves a complex immune response that includes the release of a “storm” of acute phase mediators [4,5,6]. This is a positive response of the host to prime recruitment of neutrophils and other inflammatory cells and associated production of cytokines and chemokines [7] but may reflect a worsening of the clinical situation if the cause is not eliminated. Prominent among them have been IL-6 [8,9,10] and IL-1β [11], but also the family of S100 alarmins, among which S100A8/A9 is otherwise known as calprotectin [12].
This knowledge led to early consideration of severe COVID-19 as a hyperinflammatory disorder and encouragement of the administration of modifiers of the biological response, such as dexamethasone, tocilizumab, anakinra and baricitinib, early in the course of management. Although this treatment strategy appears plausible, its rationale remains a field of active debate. This debate is stimulated by the contribution of acute-phase mediators to the immune defense and by the lack of knowledge as to whether hyperinflammation is still present at the time point of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) necessitating mechanical ventilation (MV). It is thus necessary to better identify what drives the transition from moderate and severe COVID-19 to severe ARDS and MV after the initial viral infection. This may be the only way to prevent or efficiently address the most ominous consequences of COVID-19.
In this paper, we investigated serum levels of alarmins, as well as pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules leading to ARDS and MV and how their presence tracks with disease severity.
2. Results
2.1. Study Participants
The sampling for the study took place between April and November 2020. Serum samples from 181 patients and 40 non-infected comparators were studied. Among the patient population, on the day of blood sampling, 19 patients were asymptomatic, 42 patients had moderate disease, 78 patients had severe disease, and 42 patients had ARDS and were on MV. Sampling took place within the first 24 h after admission. Patients with ARDS on MV had higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, lower respiratory ratios and higher circulating C-reactive protein and ferritin (Table 1). None of the 181 patients was in need of hemodialysis at the time of blood sampling. Patients with ARDS under MV were sedated; mean ± SD creatinine on the day of sampling was 1.0 ± 0.2 mg/dL; mean ± SD albumin was 3.2 ± 0.5 g/dL.
Table 1.
Comparators | Asymptomatic | Moderate | Severe | ARDS and MV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | 40 | 19 | 42 | 78 | 42 |
Age (years) mean ± SD | 58.3 ± 15.8 | 59.5 ± 10.8 | 55.3 ± 14.8 | 61.4 ± 13.9 | 64.9 ± 12.8 |
Male gender, n (%) | 28 (70) | 12 (63.2) | 25 (59.5) | 56 (71.8) | 35 (83.3) |
SOFA, mean ± SD | NA | NA | 0.9 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 1.6 | 6.5 ± 2.5 |
CCI, mean ± SD | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 1.9 | 2.3 ± 2.3 | 2.6 ± 2.1 | 2.4 ± 1.5 |
Comorbidities, n (%) | |||||
Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 0 (0) | 5 (26.3) | 13 (31.0) | 20 (25.6) | 6 (14.3) |
Chronic heart failure | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (7.1) | 5 (5.1) | 0 (0) |
Chronic renal disease | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (4.8) | 3 (3.8) | 2 (4.8) |
Coronary heart disease | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 (11.9) | 8 (10.3) | 6 (14.3) |
Dyslipidemia | 0 (0) | 4 (21.1) | 14 (33.3) | 17 (21.8) | 4 (9.5) |
Hypothyroidism | 0 (0) | 2 (10.5) | 7 (16.7) | 7 (9.0) | 3 (7.1) |
Hypertension | 0 (0) | 2 (10.5) | 16 (38.1) | 24 (30.8) | 7 (16.7) |
Stroke | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (4.8) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (2.4) |
Atrial fibrillation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (4.8) | 6 (7.7) | 3 (7.1) |
COPD | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (7.1) | 2 (2.6) | 0 (0) |
pO2/FiO2, mean ± SD | NA | NA | 397.5 ± 84.3 | 274.5 ± 103.8 | 127.1 ± 72.2 |
White blood cell count, mean ± SD (/mm3) | NA | NA | 5394.3 ± 2379.8 | 7000.1 ± 2945.8 | 11,977.8 ± 6094.2 |
CRP, median (IQR), mg/L | NA | NA | 4.9 (30.6) | 39.0 (80.1) | 82.9 (173.5) |
Ferritin, median (IQR), ng/mL | NA | NA | 293.2 (534.2) | 485.3 (832.5) | 1189.5 (1686.8) |
Administered drugs, n (%) | |||||
β-lactamase inhibitor | NA | 0 (0) | 1 (2.4) | 21 (29.2) | 0 (0) |
Ceftriaxone | NA | 0 (0) | 30 (71.4) | 41 (56.9) | 10 (23.8) |
Ceftaroline | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 17 (23.6) | 10 (23.8) |
Piperacillin/tazobactam | NA | 0 (0) | 8 (19.0) | 10 (13.9) | 16 (38.1) |
Ceftaziidme/avibactam | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 6 (14.3) |
Glycopeptides/linezolid | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (4.2) | 12 (28.6) |
Remdesivir | NA | 0 (0) | 20 (47.6) | 30 (41.7) | 9 (21.4) |
Dexamethasone | NA | 0 (0) | 4 (9.5) | 72 (100) | 42 (100) |
Nor-adrenaline | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 27 (64.3) |
Furosemide | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 29 (69.0) |
Midazolam | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 29 (69.0) |
Fentanyl | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 24 (57.1) |
Propofol | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 29 (69.0) |
Dexmetomidine | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (16.7) |
Cisatracurium | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (16.7) |
Abbreviations: ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome; CCI = Charlson’s comorbidity index; CRP = C-reactive protein; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen; IQR = interquartile range; MV = mechanical ventilation; NA = not available; pO2: partial oxygen pressure; SD = standard deviation; SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment score.
In the first stage of the study, the samples were analyzed in an effort to identify a set of mediators that may drive progression toward ARDS and MV. In the second stage of the study, the mediators were serially followed over time to define if the levels change over-time until ARDS and MV (Figure 1).
2.2. First Stage: Presence of Inflammation-Associated Mediators
Among the proinflammatory mediators, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17, IL-33 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) did not differ between the stages of severity. However, IL-8 and IL-18 levels were significantly higher among patients with critical ARDS necessitating MV compared to less severely ill patients. Among anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-33r (soluble ST2) levels were significantly higher among patients with critical ARDS. IL-1ra (soluble receptor antagonist) levels were higher among patients with mild to critical COVID-19, although there was no significant difference between patients with severe and critical disease. IL-10 did not differ among patients and controls. IL-38 levels were decreased in asymptomatic patients relative to patients at more severe stages (Figure 2). Interferons did not differ between patients (Supplementary Figure S1).
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-B and, to a lesser extent, PDGF-A were increased among critically ill ARDS patients; PAF did not differ. The same was the case for calprotectin and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9. PAF and S100B did not differ among different stages of severity (Figure 3).
2.3. First Stage: Associations between Inflammatory Mediators and Progression into Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Necessitating Mechanical Ventilation (MV)
ROC curve analyses identified that IL-8, IL-18, MMP-9, IL-33r, PDGF-B and calprotectin were associated with ARDS necessitating MV (Figure 4A). The cut-offs of each of the six mediators providing the best trade-off of sensitivity and specificity were defined and entered into the equation of multivariate analysis. Only increased IL-33r, increased PDGF-B and increased calprotectin were found to be drivers of ARDS necessitating MV (Figure 4B).
2.4. First Stage: Associations between Biomarkers and 28-Day Mortality
Analysis involved hospitalized patients with moderate and severe COVID-19, as well as patients with ARDS necessitating MV. For this analysis, we decided to implement a pathway-like division of biomarkers into clusters. To this end, nine pathways were defined as follows: (a) IL-1ra activation, when both IL-1β and IL-1ra were above the median of the entire cohort; (b) IL-6 pathway, when IL-6 was above the median of the entire cohort; (c) IL-18 pathway, when IL-18 was above the cut-off defined for critical illness; (d) neutrophil activation, when at least two of the following conditions were met: IL-8 > 100 pg/mL, MMP-9 > 870 pg/mL or IL-17 above the lower limit of detection; (e) interferon pathway, when at least one of the three measured interferons was above the median of the entire cohort; (f) IL-33 pathway, when IL-33r was above 170 ng/mL; (g) IL-38 pathway, when IL-38 was above the median of the entire cohort; (h) PDGF-B pathway, when PDGF-B was above 2.7 ng/mL; and (i) calprotectin pathway, when calprotectin was above 7.8 μg/mL (Figure 5 and Figure 6A).
Multivariate ordinal regression analysis showed that the pathways of IL-6, IL-33 and calprotectin were associated with allocation into more severe states of the WHO-CPS after 28 days (Figure 6B). On the contrary, IL-1ra and IL-38 pathways were associated with allocation into less severe states of the WHO-CPS after 28 days. The IL-6, IL-33 and calprotectin pathways were independent drivers for mortality, acting synergistically. On the contrary, the IL-1ra and IL-38 pathways did not affect survival (Figure 6C,D).
2.5. Second Stage: Validation of the Role of S100A8/A9 (Calprotectin) in Progression into ARDS Necessitating MV
The SAVE-MORE trial enrolled patients who were in neither the ARDS nor MV category [13]. Among participants allocated to placebo treatment, samples collected serially from patients who progressed into ARDS and MV were analyzed. This was done because patient follow-up under placebo is considered to represent the progression of COVID-19 under the current standard-of-care management. At baseline, circulating levels of calprotectin and PDGF-B were similar among patients who eventually progressed into ARDS and MV and among those who did not progress into ARDS and MV (Figure 7A,B). On day 4, there was a trend toward increasing calprotectin from baseline among patients who developed ARDS and necessitated MV. This trend became a largely significant difference on day 7 (Figure 7C). No similar changes were found for PDGF-B (Figure 7D). Following ROC curve analysis, it was found that any increase in calprotectin from baseline was associated with the development of ARDS and MV. This association was proven to be independent of disease severity and of dexamethasone treatment after multivariate forward stepwise Cox regression analysis (Figure 7E). None of these patients needed hemodialysis before day 8 (Figure 7F).
3. Discussion
Our results highlight, for the first time, the conditions necessary for patients with COVID-19 to demonstrate the most worrisome features of critical illness with ARDS necessitating MV. The pathways of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), IL-33 (ST2) and coagulation drive ARDS and MV, whereas final outcome is dominated by excess of a proinflammatory state through the IL-6, IL-33 and DAMPs pathways, as well as by decreased levels of the anti-inflammatory pathways IL-38 and IL-1ra.
Several studies suggest that serum calprotectin is increased with COVID-19 severity. Twelve studies were subjected to systemic review [14] and eight studies were meta-analyzed [15]. Our findings regarding elevated serum levels of S100A8/A9 (calprotectin) are in line with previous results in the serum and in the bronchoalveolar lavage of COVID-19 patients [16,17], as well as with the results of the systemic review [14] and of the meta-analysis [15], showing, as we did, that calprotectin levels are higher among patients with the more severe state of disease. Most of these studies enrolled limited numbers of patients. Among these studies, only one failed to show that calprotectin is an indicator of unfavorable outcome. This study reported on the measurements of calprotectin of 222 hospital admissions in an emergency department; 25 patients had an unfavorable outcome, which was defined as a composite of need of non-invasive ventilation, MV or death [18]. Our study presents two main differences in design compared to previous publications: (a) the comparison of the trajectories of COVID-19 from asymptomatic to moderate severe and critical disease where calprotectin steadily increases; and (b) the independent association of calprotectin with the progression into critical illness and unfavorable outcome through a pathway-like approach, including multivariate analysis. Others have also recently reported that calprotectin is further increased from a state of non-invasive ventilation to the need of MV [19].
It is known that SARS-CoV-2 per se cannot elicit large amounts of inflammatory mediators leading to ARDS and MV [20]. However, rapid viral replication in the lungs leads to the destruction of lung epithelial cells and to the subsequent release of intracellular DAMPs, such as calprotectin. Our findings suggest that as the disease progresses and the patient worsens towards ARDS, increased calprotectin could contribute to the need for MV. This DAMPs pathway acts synergistically with the IL-6 and IL-33 pathways, mediating unfavorable outcomes. The crucial role of calprotectin in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is further supported by a mouse model of lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection in which expression of S100A8 in the lungs was increased, whereas infection by the influenza A virus, encephalomyelitis virus and herpes simplex virus were not accompanied by an increase in the expression of S100A8. Treatment of mice infected by SARS-CoV-2 with the calprotectin inhibitor paquinimod increased survival by 100% and attenuated infiltration of the lungs by neutrophils, suggesting a possible role of calprotectin for neutrophil chemotaxis and activation [21].
Although PDGF-B was not increased over time towards progression into ARDS and MV, the increased circulating PDGF-B described herein is interesting, given reports of widespread pulmonary microthromboses in lungs of deceased COVID-19 patients [22].
Our findings of increased levels of IL-1ra and IL-33r are intriguing, as serum levels of IL-1β and IL-33 levels were not significantly increased. This apparent contradiction may be explained by the autocrine mode of action of these cytokines following their production, implying that COVID-19 patients, especially those with severe disease, produce soluble IL-1ra and IL-33r (sST2) in an apparent effort to curtail the effect of IL-1β and IL-33, respectively. Elevated sST2 has also been reported in severe (especially non-surviving) patients with COVID-19 [23]. A recent publication reported that published scRNseq data from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with mild to severe COVID-19 contained a population of cells that produce IL-33 and correlate with severity of disease [24]. Two other publications reported a unique correlation of IL-12p70/IL-33 with disease severity [25] and increased expression of IL-33 in cultured epithelial cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 [26]. Taken together, these findings seem to imply that there may be local synthesis of IL-33, especially in the lungs, leading to reactive production of IL-33r (sST2). IL-33 can stimulate resident mast cells to produce impressive amounts of proinflammatory cytokines [27,28], and the findings of increased IL-33r should be interpreted as a counterbalance to the increased IL-33.
Similarly to the increased levels of IL-1ra and IL-33r, the anti-inflammatory IL-38 was increased only in asymptomatic patients as compared to non-infected comparators but decreased significantly in the more severe patient groups. This finding implies that patients cannot produce sufficient IL-38 to counteract the proinflammatory cytokines produced during COVID-19. IL-38 belongs to the IL-1 family [29] and has been reported to exhibit anti-inflammatory activity [30]. IL-38 exists intracellularly as a precursor in full-length form and must be cleaved at the N terminus before it is secreted extracellularly in an active form [31]. We showed that IL-38 can inhibit the release of IL-1β from cultured human microglia stimulated by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [32].
The final outcome of patients appears to be determined by the excess activation of the IL-6, IL-33 and DAMP pathways, and the anti-inflammatory IL-1ra and IL-38 pathways are not sufficient to counterbalance them. A recent paper reported that elevated plasma levels of IL-6, IL-10 and IP-10 anticipated clinical progression of COVID-19 patients [33]. Our results are in line with the positive treatment outcomes with IL-6 receptor antagonists and with anakinra (the recombinant non-glycosylated form of IL-1ra), as they have shown the need to attenuate the increased IL-6 response and to increase the reduced IL-1ra responses [34]. Tocilizumab and sarilumab were shown to decrease the number of days under organ dysfunction and 28-day mortality in the REMAP-CAP [35] and RECOVERY [36] platform adaptive trials respectively. In these trials, the two IL-6 receptor antagonists were administered in patients already diagnosed with critical illness. In the open-label SAVE trial [37] and in the double-blind, randomized trial SAVE-MORE [13], anakinra was administered to hospitalized non-critical patients with plasma levels of the biomarker suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) 6 ng/mL or more; suPAR was used in these studies as a biomarker of an attack of the host by DAMPs.
Results of the large-scale RECOVERY study show that the use of dexamethasone improves outcomes in COVID-19 patients, mainly those requiring oxygen and under MV [38]. Part of the action of dexamethasone is associated with decreased neutrophil production of S100A8/A9 [39].
This is one of few studies reporting on coadministered drugs among mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS. Unfortunately, information on exact dosing and nutrition was not provisioned to be captured because such information was beyond the scope of the study. This can be conceived as a limitation.
4. Methods
4.1. Patient Cohorts
Studied patients were adults with molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 and were classified into four groups using the WHO classification of COVID-19 severity: (a) asymptomatic, (b) hospitalized with moderate COVID-19, (c) hospitalized for severe COVID-19 or (d) hospitalized with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) necessitating mechanical ventilation (MV). Blood samples (10 mL) were collected in pyrogen-free tubes without anticoagulant (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville Md) within the first 24 h after admission in the emergency department, the general ward or the intensive care unit. Patients had already participated as comparators, receiving usual care in the ACHIEVE [40], SAVE [37] and ESCAPE [41] studies. Patients were enrolled after written informed consent was provided by themselves or their legal representatives.
A volume of 10 ml of blood was also collected from comparators matched for age and sex with the patients and who were admitted to emergency departments for unspecified complaints. These comparators were adults without any specific diagnosis of disease; this was certified by a phone call after 30 days. Their inclusion was provisioned in the above studies, and they also signed a written informed consent.
In order to provide evidence for the role of the mediators for progression into ARDS necessitating MV, samples collected from 52 patients participating in the SAVE-MORE trial were studied. SAVE-MORE is a double-blind, randomized clinical trial where patients were allocated to treatment with placebo or anakinra plus standard of care to prevent progression into severe respiratory failure [13]. The studied samples were from patients with severe disease in need of treatment with oxygen and who were allocated to the placebo group so that comparative levels of the mediators at serial time points may dictate their role towards development into ARDS and MV. With this aim, only patients from the placebo group not under modulation with biologicals during all three time periods of sampling (baseline, day 4 and day 7) were studied; 19 patients progressed into ARDS and MV within the first 28 days; another 33 patients matched for age, gender and comorbidities who did not progress into ARDS and MV were studied as comparators.
4.2. Laboratory Assays
All blood samples were processed immediately, and the serum was stored at −80 °C until assayed. Levels of biomarkers were quantified by using commercially available kits of enzyme immunosorbent assays from Bio-Techne (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The lower limits of detection were 16 pg/mL for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), 8 pg/mL for interleukin (IL)-1β, 31 pg/mL for IL-1ra (receptor antagonist), 40 pg/mL for IL-6, 31 pg/mL for IL-8 and IL-10, 8 pg/mL for IL-17, 62 pg/mL for IL-18, 31 pg/mL for IL-33r (receptor), 62 pg/mL for IL-38, 156 pg/mL for interferon (IFN) alpha; 78 pg/mL for IFNβ, 156 pg/mL for IFNγ, 80 pg/mL for platelet activation factor (PAF), 313 p/mL for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A and PDGF-B, 61 pg/mL for S100A8/A9, 31 pg/mL for matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-9 and 46 pg/mL for S100B.
4.3. Study Endpoints
The primary study endpoint was to define a set of cytokines and inflammatory mediators that are independently associated with progression into critical ARDS necessitating mechanical ventilation.
The secondary study endpoints were to define a set of cytokines and inflammatory mediators that are independently associated with the outcome of COVID-19 after 28 days, as this is expressed both by the strata of the WHO Clinical Progression Scale (CPS) and by mortality.
4.4. Statistical Analysis
Concentrations of biomarkers between groups of patients were compared using the Mann–Whitney non-parametric U test following Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for each of the measured mediators to define a cut-off that can significantly discriminate patients with ARDS necessitating MV; the areas under the curve of the ROC (AUC), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p values were determined. For significant variables, the cut-off concentration providing the best trade-off for sensitivity and specificity was determined by the Youden index. In order to define the variables that were drivers of ARDS necessitating MV, forward stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed. ARDS necessitating MV was entered into the equation as a dependent variable and all significant mediators at the predefined cut-offs as independent variables.
Mediators were divided with a pathway-like approach. Nine pathways were defined as follows: (a) IL-1ra activation using IL-1β and IL-1ra; (b) IL-6 pathway using IL-6; (c) IL-18 pathway using IL-18; (d) neutrophil activation using IL-8, MMP-9 and IL-17; (e) interferon pathway using the three measured IFNs; (f) IL-33 pathway using IL-33 and IL-33r; (g) IL-38 pathway using IL-38; (h) platelet-activation pathway using PAF, PDGF-A and PDGF-B; and (i) calprotectin/alarmin pathway using S100A8/A9. The pathways were defined in a hierarchical order, using the cut-offs of ROC curve analysis as the first step in the case of significant mediators and the median levels of the entire cohort as the second step (Figure 5). Patients were subgrouped as belonging or not belonging to each of the nine pathways of activation (Yes/No). Comparisons of the WHO-CPS strata in each subgroup were performed by univariate ordinal regression analysis, followed by multivariate ordinal regression analysis. Next, 28-day mortality was compared between subgroups by Cox forward stepwise multiple regression analysis. In this analysis, 28-day mortality was the dependent variable, and variables significant for WHO-CPS were the independent variables.
The fold change of mediators determined to be associated with ARDS and MV on days 4 and 7 from baseline was calculated and compared by the Mann–Whitney U test. The cut-off of fold change that was associated with ARDS and MV was defined by the area under the ROC curve using the Youden index. The value of this cut-off was further validated by forward stepwise Cox regression analysis. Progression into ARDS and MV was the dependent variable; the defined cut-offs, baseline severity and dexamethasone treatment were the independent variables.
5. Conclusions
Multivariate ordinal regression showed that IL-6, IL-33 and calprotectin pathways were significantly associated with worse outcome. Further research is needed to decipher the significance of these findings compared to other acute-phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) or ferritin. Our results further suggest that the innate increase in IL-1ra and IL-33r, along with the drop in IL-38, is not sufficient to halt the progression of COVID-19. Attenuating the IL-6, IL-33 and DAMP pathways while administering IL-1ra, IL-33r and, potentially, recombinant IL-38, seems to be the most promising strategy to combat severe COVID-19.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23094894/s1.
Author Contributions
G.K., A.S., G.P., G.A., A.R., H.M., G.N.D., V.P., S.S., S.M. and Z.A. collected patient data, revised the manuscript and gave permission for the version to be submitted. T.G. performed measurements, revised the manuscript and gave permission for the version to be submitted. E.J.G.-B. supervised the study, analyzed and plotted the results, wrote the manuscript and takes full responsibility for data integrity. T.C.T. conceived the study, secured the reagents, participated in data analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Studies ACHIEVE, SAVE and ESCAPE were approved by the National Ethics Committee of Greece and by the National Organization for Medicines of Greece (approval numbers 45/20 and IS 36/20, respectively, for ACHIEVE; approval numbers 38/20 and IS 28/20 respectively for SAVE; and approval numbers 30/20 and IS 021-20, respectively, for ESCAPE). The SAVE-MORE was approved by the National Ethics Committee of Greece (approval 161/20) and by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani, IRCCS in Rome (approval 1 February 2021).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was provided by patients or legal representatives for patients unable to consent.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
G. Poulakou has received independent educational grants from Pfizer, MSD, Angelini and Biorad. H. Milionis reports receiving honoraria, consulting fees and non-financial support from healthcare companies, including Amgen, Angelini, Bayer, Mylan, MSD, Pfizer and Servier. G. N. Dalekos is an advisor or lecturer for Ipsen, Pfizer, Genkyotex, Novartis and Sobi; received research grants from Abbvie and Gilead; and has served as PI in studies for Abbvie, Novartis, Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Genkyotex, Regulus Therapeutics Inc., Tiziana Life Sciences, Bayer, Astellas, Pfizer, Amyndas Pharmaceuticals, CymaBay Therapeutics Inc., Sobi and Intercept Pharmaceuticals. E. J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis has received honoraria from Abbott CH, bioMérieux, Brahms GmbH, GSK, InflaRx GmbH, Sobi and XBiotech Inc; independent educational grants from Abbott CH, AxisShield, bioMérieux Inc, InflaRx GmbH, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Sobi and XBiotech Inc.; and funding from the Horizon2020 Marie-Curie Project European Sepsis Academy (granted to the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) and the Horizon 2020 European Grants ImmunoSep and RISKinCOVID (granted to the Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis). The other authors do not have any competing interest to declare.
Funding Statement
All reagent kits were provided for free by Bio-Techne (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Funding was provided in part by the Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis. Collection of biomaterial and clinical information from patients enrolled in the ESCAPE trial was funded by the Horizon 2020 Grant RISCinCOVID.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Tai W., He L., Zhang X., Pu J., Voronin D., Jiang S., Zou Y., Du L. Characterization of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implication for development of RBD protein as a viral attachment inhibitor and vaccine. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020;17:613–620. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0400-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Canna S.W., Cron R.Q. Highways to hell: Mechanism-based management of cytokine storm syndromes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020;146:949–959. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moore J.B., June C.H. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science. 2020;368:473–474. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Giamarellos-Bourboulis E.J., Netea M.G., Rovina N., Akinosoglou K., Antoniadou A., Antonakos N., Damoraki G., Gkavogianni T., Adami E.M., Katsaounou P., et al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:992–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen G., Wu D., Guo W., Cao Y., Huang D., Wang H., Wang T., Zhang X., Chen H., Yu H., et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Investig. 2020;130:2620–2629. doi: 10.1172/JCI137244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brodin P. Immune determinants of COVID-19 disease presentation and severity. Nat. Med. 2021;27:28–33. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01202-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Herold T., Jurinovic V., Arnreich C., Lipworth B.J., Hellmuth J.C., von Bergwelt-Baildon M., Klein M., Weinberger T. Elevated levels of IL-6 and CRP predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020;146:128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malik I.A., Ramadori G. Interleukin-6-production is responsible for induction of hepatic synthesis of several chemokines as acute-phase mediators in two animal models: Possible significance for interpretation of laboratory changes in severely ill patients. Biology. 2022;11:470. doi: 10.3390/biology11030470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Han H., Ma Q., Li C., Liu R., Zhao L., Wang W., Zhang P., Liu X., Gao G., Liu F., et al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9:1123–1130. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1770129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mazzoni A., Salvati L., Maggi L., Capone M., Vanni A., Spinicci M., Mencarini J., Caporale R., Peruzzi B., Antonelli A., et al. Impaired immune cell cytotoxicity in severe COVID-19 is IL-6 dependent. J. Clin. Investig. 2020;130:4694–4703. doi: 10.1172/JCI138554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Conti P., Caraffa A., Gallenga C.E., Ross R., Kritas S.K., Frydas I., Younes A., Ronconi G. Coronavirus-19 (SARS-CoV-2) induces acute severe lung inflammation via IL-1 causing cytokine storm in COVID-19: A promising inhibitory strategy. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2020;34:1971–1975. doi: 10.23812/20-1-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Silvin A., Chapuis N., Dunsmore G., Goubet A.G., Dubuisson A., Derosa L., Almire C., Hénon C., Kosmider O., Droin N., et al. Elevated calprotectin and abnormal myeloid cell subsets discriminate severe from mild COVID-19. Cell. 2020;182:1401–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kyriazopoulou E., Poulakou G., Milionis H., Metallidis S., Adamis G., Tsiakos K., Fragkou A., Rapti A., Damoulari D., Fantoni M., et al. Early treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: A double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Nat. Med. 2021;27:1752–1760. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01499-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mahler M., Meron P.L., Infantino M., Buhler K.A., Fritzler M.J. Circulating calprotectin as a biomarker of COVID-19 severity. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2021;17:431–443. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1905526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mao Q., Wang C., Wen W., Zhou M., Tanj J., Chen C., Cheng Y., Wu Q., Zhang X., Feng Z., et al. A meta-analysis of the association between calprotectin and the severity of COVID-19. J. Infect. 2021;84:e31–e33. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen L., Long X., Xu Q., Tan J., Wang X., Cao Y., Wei J., Luo H., Zhu H., Huang L., et al. Elevated serum levels of S100A8/A9 and HMGB1 at hospital admission are correlated with inferior clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020;17:992–994. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0492-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bauer W., Diehl-Wiesenecker E., Ulke J., Galtung N., Havelka A., Hegel J.K., Tauber R., Somasundaram R., Kappert K. Outcome prediction by serum calprotectin in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department. J. Infect. 2021;82:84–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mentzer A.J., James T., Yongya M., Cox S., Paddon K., Shine B., Bowen J., Novak A., Knight J.C., Fullerton J.N. Serum calprotectin is not an independent predictor of severe COVID-19 in ambulatory adult patients. J. Infect. 2022;84:e27–e33. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shi H., Zuo Y., Yalavarthi S., Gockman K., Zuo M., Madison J.A., Blair C., Woodward W., Lezak S.P., Lugogo N.L., et al. Neutrophil calprotectin identifies severe pulmonary disease in COVID-19. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2021;109:67–72. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3COVCRA0720-359R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang W., Li M., Luo G., Wu X., Su B., Zhao L., Zhang S., Chen X., Jia M., Zhu J., et al. The inflammatory factors associated with disease severity to predict COVID-19 progression. J. Immunol. 2021;206:1597–1608. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guo Q., Zhao Y., Li J., Liu J., Yang X., Guo X., Kuang M., Xia H., Zhang Z., Cao L., et al. Induction of alarmin S100A8/A9 mediates activation of aberrant neutrophils in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:222–235. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ackermann M., Verleden S.E., Kuehnel M., Haverich A., Welte T., Laenger F., Vanstapel A., Werlein C., Stark H., Tzankov A., et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:120–128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2015432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zeng Z., Hong X.Y., Li Y., Chen W., Ye G., Li Y., Luo Y. Serum-soluble ST2 as a novel biomarker reflecting inflammatory status and illness severity in patients with COVID-19. Biomark. Med. 2020;14:1619–1629. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2020-0410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stanczak M.A., Sanin D.E., Apostolova P., Nerz G., Lampaki D., Hofmann M., Steinmann D., Krohn-Grimberghe M., Thimme R., Mittler G., et al. IL-33 expression in response to SARS-CoV-2 correlates with seropositivity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2133. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22449-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Munitz A., Erdy-Boltzer L., Itan M., Tur-Kaspa R., Dicker D., Marcoviu D., Goren M.G., Mor M., Lev S., Gottesman T., et al. Rapid seroconversion and persistent functional IgG antibodies in severe COVID-19 patients correlates with an IL-12p70 and IL-33 signature. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:3461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83019-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liang Y., Ge Y., Sun J. IL-33 in COVID-19: Friend or foe? Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021;18:1602–1604. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00685-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Taracanova A., Alevizos M., Karagkouni A., Weng Z., Norwitz E., Conit P., Leeman S.E., Theoharides T.C. SP and IL-33 together markedly enhance TNF synthesis and secretion from human mast cells mediated by the interaction of their receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E4002–E4009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524845114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Taracanova A., Tsilioni I., Conti P., Norwitz E.R., Leemanm S.E., Theoharidesm T.C. Substance P and IL-33 administered together stimulate a marked secretion of IL-1beta from human mast cells, inhibited by methoxyluteolin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E9381–E9390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810133115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mantovani A., Dinarello C.A., Molgora M., Garlandam C. Interleukin-1 and related cytokines in the regulation of inflammation and immunity. Immunity. 2019;50:778–795. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.van de Veerdonk F.L., de Graaf D.M., Joosten L.A., Dinarello C.A. Biology of IL-38 and its role in disease. Immunol. Rev. 2018;281:191–196. doi: 10.1111/imr.12612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kwak A., Lee Y., Kim H., Kim S. Intracellular interleukin (IL)-1 family cytokine processing enzyme. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2016;39:1556–1564. doi: 10.1007/s12272-016-0855-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsilioni I., Pantazopoulos H., Conti P., Leeman S.E., Theoharides T.C. IL-38 inhibits microglial inflammatory mediators and is decreased in amygdala of children with autism spectrum disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:16475–16480. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004666117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Laing A.G., Lorenc A., Del Moline Del Barrio I., Das A., Fish M., Monin L., Muñoz-Ruiz M., McKenzie D.R., Hayday T.S., Francos-Quijorna I., et al. A dynamic COVID-19 immune signature includes associations with poor prognosis. Nat. Med. 2021;26:1623–1635. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dalekos G.N., Stefos A., Georgiadou S., Lygoura V., Michail A., Ntaios G., Smakidou A., Giannoulis G., Gabeta S., Vlychou M., et al. Lessons from pathophysiology: Use of individualized combination treatments with immune interventional agents to tackle severe respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2021;88:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gordon A.C., Mouncey P.R., Al-Beidh E., Rowan K.M., Nichol A.D., Arabi Y.M., Annane D., Beane A., van Bentum-Puijk W., Berry L.R., et al. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:1491–1502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Recovery Collaborative Group Tocilizumab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): A randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet. 2021;397:1637–1645. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00676-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kyriazopoulou E., Panagopoulos P., Metallidis S., Dalekos G.N., Poulakou G., Gatselis N., Karakike E., Saridaki M., Loli G., Stefos A., et al. An open label trial of anakinra to prevent respiratory failure in COVID-19. eLife. 2021;10:e66125. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Horby P., Lim W.S., Emberson J.R., Mafham M., Bell J.L., Linsell L., Staplin N., Brightling C., Ustianowski A., Elmahi E., et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;384:693–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sinha S., Rosin N.L., Arora R., Labit E., Jaffer A., Cao L., Farias R., Nguyen A.P., de Almeida L.G.N., Dufour A., et al. Dexamethasone modulates immature neutrophils and interferon reprogramming in severe COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2022;28:201–211. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01576-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tsiakos K., Tsakiris A., Tsibris G., Voutsinas P.M., Panagopoulos P., Kosmidou A., Petrakis V., Gravvani A., Gkavogianni T., Klouras E., et al. Early start of clarithromycin is associated with better outcome in COVID-19 of moderate severity: The ACHIEVE open-label single-arm trial. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2021;10:2333–2351. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00505-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Karakike E., Dalekos G.N., Koutsodimitropoulos I., Saridaki I., Poutzitaki C., Papathanakos G., Kotsaki A., Chalvatzis S., Dimakopoulou V., Vechlidis N., et al. ESCAPE: An open-label trial of personalized immunotherapy in critically ill COVID-19 patients. J. Innate Immun. 2021;14:218–228. doi: 10.1159/000519090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the corresponding author upon request.