Skip to main content
Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base logoLink to Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base
. 2020 Jul 1;82(4):456–460. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713103

Facial Nerve Adherence in Vestibular Schwannomas: Classification and Radiological Predictors

Gustavo Simiano Jung 1,, Guilherme Ramina Montibeller 1, Gabriel Schier de Fraga 2, Thais dos Santos Rohde 3, Ricardo Ramina 1
PMCID: PMC9100449  PMID: 35573922

Abstract

Background  Facial nerve palsy is one of the most frequent complications after resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS). Several mechanisms have been implicated in the poor postoperative facial nerve outcome. Adherence between the facial nerve and tumor capsule is one of the most relevant factors. There is no clear preoperative parameter permitting identification of these adhesions.

Objective  The aim of this study was to identify the correlation between the grade of adherence of the facial nerve to the tumor capsule and its functional outcome after VS resection.

Methods  A total of 26 patients with sporadic VS (tumor sized T3, T4A, and T4B according to Hannover classification) were evaluated. Grade of adherence of the facial nerve to the tumor capsule was checked during surgery and graduated according to a proposed scale into 1 to 3 different grades. Facial nerve function was assessed postoperatively and after 1-year follow-up. Size of tumor according to Hannover classification, presence of cystic components, “cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cleft sign,” and the contour of tumor capsule were tested as radiological predictors of grade of adherence to the facial nerve.

Results and Conclusion  Only Grade 2 (11 cases) and 3 (15 cases) of adherence were seen in large VS. Lower grade of adherence was associated with good facial nerve outcome after 1-year follow-up ( p  = 0.029). Presence of the “CSF cleft sign” and regular contour of tumor capsule were independent predictors of adherence. When both factors were associated, sensitivity and specificity of this method were 83 and 80%, respectively.

Keywords: acoustic neuroma, facial nerve, facial paralysis, facial nerve injuries

Introduction

Facial nerve palsy is one of the most frequent complications following vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and affects, even transiently, up to 53% of the patients. 1 2 3 Several mechanisms have been implicated in postoperative facial nerve palsy after VS surgery. Ischemia of the nerve and direct rupture of axonal fibers are the more frequent. 4 5

Grade of facial nerve adherence to the tumor capsule is presumed to direct influence in the postoperative facial nerve function.

In the literature, all series targeting this matter are purely based on the surgeon's perception, lacking objective analysis, and conclusions. 6 7

The objectives of this study were: (1) propose a classification method for facial nerve adherence to the VS capsule, (2) correlate this classification with the functional outcome of the facial nerve, and (3) identify preoperative radiological features associated with higher grades of adherence.

Methods

Population

Between April 2016 to May 2018, 50 patients harboring unilateral sporadic VS staged according to Hannover scale 8 as T3 (tumor touching the brainstem), T4A (tumor compressing the brainstem), and T4B (hydrocephalus secondary to compression of the fourth ventricle) were submitted to complete surgical resection at the Neurological Institute of Curitiba (INC), Brazil. Tumors classified as T1 and T2 were excluded from this study. Surgery was performed via retrosigmoid/transmeatal approach, in supine position, by the senior author (R.R.) as previously described. 9 Patients were included in the study if they had diagnosis of VS confirmed by pathological examination and the surgical video was available for analysis. Precise intraoperative facial nerve identification at the brainstem and internal auditory canal by electro-stimulation with 2.0 mA and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were requirements of inclusion in this study. Based on this criteria, 26 patients were eligible for inclusion ( Fig. 1 ). The local institutional ethical committee approved this retrospective review, and the signed consent was waived.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of patient sample and exclusion criteria.

Clinical and Radiological Assessment

All patients had facial nerve function assessed according to the House–Brackmann (HB) scale 10 preoperatively and postoperatively on day 3 and 1-year after surgery. HB grade I and II were considered as good facial nerve outcome. All patients were preoperatively evaluated with brain MRI. On 3D, balanced steady-state gradient echo sequence the presence of cystic component and “cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cleft sign” on the interface tumor/brainstem were evaluated. The tumor was considered a cystic VS if it showed presence of hyperintense areas on T2 weighted images and cystic elements were intraoperatively identified. The “CSF cleft sign” was considered present when evidenced on the interface between the tumor and the brainstem around the emergence of the facial nerve at the pontomedullary junction ( Fig. 2 ). Tumor capsule contour was considered regular if no lobulations were seen on its interface with the brainstem.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Three-dimensional balanced steady-state gradient echo sequence demonstrating the presence of the “CSF cleft sign” between the tumor and the brainstem. ( A ) The sign is evidenced in a patient harboring a left Hannover T3 Vestibular schwannoma (black arrow). ( B ) Small Hannover T3 schwannoma with regular capsule demonstrates the absence of the sign (white arrow) suggesting that its presence is not related with the tumor size. ( C ) “CSF cleft sign” is demonstrated in a large left Hannover T4A vestibular schwannoma (black arrow). ( D ) Sign is absent in a similar T4A patient (white arrow). CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.

Surgical Videos Analysis

The surgical videos were blindly analyzed by an experienced skull base surgeon (R.R.) and adherence of the tumor capsule to the facial nerve was classified into three different types. Type 1 adherence: displacement of the facial nerve by the tumor, but the arachnoid membrane between the tumor and the facial nerve was not infiltrated. Type 2 adherence: the tumor displaces the facial nerve and infiltrates the arachnoid layer but pia mater and the perineurium of the facial nerve were not infiltrated; dissection plane is precisely identified ( Fig. 3A ). Type 3 adherence: the tumor displaces the facial nerve and infiltrates the arachnoid layer, and the dissection plane is not visible by the infiltration of the pia mater and the perineurium of the facial nerve ( Fig. 3B ).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

( A ) Left T4A vestibular schwannoma. A partially removed tumor is being pulled off and no arachnoid layer is seen. The pia mater of the facial nerve is preserved, and the dissection plane is clearly visible (white arrow). ( B ) Left T4B vestibular schwannoma. A bimanual dissection technique is demonstrated. The tumor capsule (vestibular schwannomas) is being pulled off with forceps and the facial nerve is visualized with no arachnoid layer interposed between the tumor and the facial nerve. The pia mater of the facial nerve is infiltrated, distorting the anatomy of the facial nerve. No clear dissection plane is visible (white arrow).

Statistical Analysis

Fisher's exact test was used to compare the facial nerve function in different groups. The occurrence of the “CSF cleft sign” and the features of the tumor capsule contour among the different grades of adherence were compared using Chi-square test. A value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients

Demographic and clinical data are shown in the Table 1 . Total 14 male and 12 female patients with mean age of 47 ± 14 years (mean ± standard deviation) were studied. Facial nerve was anatomically preserved in all cases. Seven patients (26.9%) presented tumor size T3, 9 (34.6%) T4A, and 10 (38.4%) T4B. Preoperatively, all patients had normal facial function and 16 patients developed facial palsy (HB ≥ III) on day 3 after surgery. Total 55% of the patients with HB III and 50% HB IV improved to HB ≤ II in 1-year follow-up.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical data.

Patient Age Gender Side Hannover Facial nerve 3rd PO Facial nerve 1-Year Grade of facial nerve adherence Cystic CSF cleft sign Tumor capsule
1 37 M L T4A 4 2 2 No No Regular
2 67 M R T4A 4 3 3 No Yes Regular
3 41 F R T3 4 3 2 No No Regular
4 24 M L T4B 2 2 2 Yes Yes Regular
5 40 F R T4B 1 5 3 Yes No Irregular
6 41 M R T3 3 2 2 No Yes Irregular
7 59 M R T3 3 3 3 No No Irregular
8 45 F R T4A 1 3 3 Yes No Irregular
9 31 M R T4B 5 3 3 No No Irregular
10 54 M R T4A 4 2 3 Yes No Irregular
11 49 M R T4B 2 1 2 Yes Yes Regular
12 18 F R T4B 3 4 3 Yes No Irregular
13 52 M L T4B 1 1 3 No No Irregular
14 78 F R T4B 5 5 3 Yes No Irregular
15 39 F L T4B 3 3 3 Yes Yes Irregular
16 52 F L T4A 2 3 2 Yes Yes Regular
17 41 F L T4B 1 1 2 Yes No Irregular
18 69 M L T3 3 2 2 No Yes Irregular
19 42 F L T3 2 2 3 No No Regular
20 67 M R T4B 5 3 3 Yes No Irregular
21 54 F R T4A 3 1 3 Yes No Irregular
22 67 F L T3 3 2 2 No Yes Regular
23 42 F R T4A 2 2 2 No No Regular
24 50 M R T4A 3 3 3 No No Irregular
25 35 M L T3 3 2 2 No Yes Regular
26 52 M R T4A 2 3 3 No No Irregular

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; F, female; L, left; M, male; PO, postoperation; R, right.

Hannover Scale and the Grade of Adherence

Total 15 (57.7%) and 11 (42.3%) patients were respectively classified as Grade 3 and 2 of adherence. No Grade 1 of adherence was seen. Additional review of our VS series demonstrated that Grade 1 of adherence was only seen among patients with tumor size T1 and T2. This finding is beyond the scope of this paper (data are not shown). No statistical differences in grade of adherence were found between tumor sizes T3 and T4 ( p 0.45) or T4A and T4B ( p 0.8).

Grade of Adherence and Facial Nerve Function

Grade of adherence did not influence the early facial nerve function (day 3 postoperation; p 0.5), but strongly influenced the late facial nerve function (1-year follow-up). Nine patients (81%) from the group Grade 2 of adherence demonstrated good late facial nerve function compared with 4 patients (26.6%) on the Grade 3 ( p  = 0.029).

Radiological Characteristic and the Grade of Adherence

Cystic components and the “CSF cleft sign” were observed in 12 patients (46.1%) and 9 patients (34.6%), respectively. Tumor contour was regular in 36.4% of the cases. Presence of cystic component was not associated with the grade of adherence. On the other hand, the presence of “CSF cleft sign” ( p 0.002) and tumor capsule with regular contour ( p 0.004) were associated with lower grade of adherence (Grade 2). A sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 80% in predicting the grade of adherence were found when associating these both characteristics.

Discussion

Degenerative alterations in the facial nerve nucleus and loss of plasticity in the facial motor cortex after long-standing facial nerve injuries causing muscle atrophy can significantly compromise the surgical results of reanimation procedures. 11 12

The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is an essential tool for preservation of the facial nerve in VS surgery and additionally, based on the stimulation thresholds, may predict facial nerve function outcome. 13

Ischemia and direct rupture of axonal fibers are significant mechanisms of facial nerve injury during VS resection. Grade of adherence of the facial nerve to the tumor capsule is an independent factor in facial nerve injury during VS surgery. 6

The structural anatomy of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve truly resembles a nerve root of the spinal cord, lacking epineurium but covered with pia mater and arachnoid. 14 15 With a hypothetical epiarachnoidal growth of VS, these structures could be affected in different degrees. 16

In our series, three distinct grades of facial nerve adherence could be identified. Grade 1 was marked by the preservation of the arachnoidal layer between VS and the facial nerve. Grade 2, the arachnoid around the facial nerve was infiltrated, but the dissection plane was easily identified by preservation of the pia mater. Grade 3 was characterized by infiltration of the pia mater and the perineurium of the facial nerve making the identification of the dissection plane very arduous. In our surgical series, Grade I of adherence was exclusive to patients with tumor size T1 and T2 that were beyond of scope. The facial nerve adherence classification proposed in this study remains subjective as it is not possible to demonstrate these degrees of facial nerve involvement with anatomopathological examinations.

In patients with large VS (T3 and T4), this classification was strongly associated with the late but not with the early facial nerve function. The transient edema and neuropraxis that follows facial nerve manipulation is possibly associated with this occurrence. 1 2 17 18

In our series, grade of adherence was not influenced by either tumor size or presence of cystic component, opposing to that presented by Piccirillo et al. 18 These results, however, must be carefully interpreted since cystic VS were not subclassified in our analysis.

We could not find in the literature any previous report discussing the preoperative predictability of the facial nerve adherence in VS patients. The presence of the “CSF cleft sign,” a known characteristic of extra axial tumors easily identified in T2-sequences, 19 in association with the regular contour of the tumor capsule, predicted in this study the grade of adherence with a sensitivity of 83%.

Some authors have demonstrated the presence of inflammatory antigen (CD45, CD68, M-CSF, and IL-4) in fast growing VS. 20 21 This inflammatory environment created by fast growing tumors could play some role in different types of adhesion between the tumor and the brainstem, possibly accounting for presence or absence of the “CSF cleft sign.”

Conclusion

Grade of adherence of VS to the facial nerve is one of the most important factors in late outcome of facial nerve function after surgical resection. Careful analysis of the “CSF cleft sign” and the contour of the tumor may predict the grade of adherence of the facial nerve to the tumor capsule. These findings could anticipate the difficulties in dissecting and preserving the facial nerve.

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Authors' Contributions

G.S.J. supported in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. G.S.J., G.R.M., G.S.F., and T.S.R. dedicated in substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. R.R. prepared final approval of the version to be published.

References

  • 1.Ginzkey C, Scheich M, Harnisch W et al. Outcome on hearing and facial nerve function in microsurgical treatment of small vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(04):1209–1216. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Samii M, Matthies C.Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the facial nerve--preservation and restitution of function Neurosurgery 19974004684–694., discussion 694–695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Breun M, Nickl R, Perez J et al. Vestibular schwannoma resection in a consecutive series of 502 cases via the retrosigmoid approach: technical aspects, complications, and functional outcome. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:e114–e127. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marenda S A, Olsson J E. The evaluation of facial paralysis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1997;30(05):669–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fenton J E, Chin R Y, Kalamarides M, Sterkers O, Sterkers J M, Fagan P A. Delayed facial palsy after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2001;28(02):113–116. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(00)00110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bozorg Grayeli A, Kalamarides M, Fraysse B et al. Comparison between intraoperative observations and electromyographic monitoring data for facial nerve outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125(10):1069–1074. doi: 10.1080/00016480510038608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seo J H, Jun B C, Jeon E J, Chang K H. Predictive factors influencing facial nerve outcomes in surgery for small-sized vestibular schwannoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013;133(07):722–727. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.776178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tatagiba M, Acioly M A. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2014. pp. 265–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leal A G, Silva E B, Jr, Ramina R. Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal through the retrosigmoid approach with semicircular canals anatomical preservation. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015;73(05):425–430. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20150020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.House J W, Brackmann D E. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(02):146–147. doi: 10.1177/019459988509300202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neiss W F, Guntinas Lichius O, Angelov D N, Gunkel A, Stennert E. The hypoglossal-facial anastomosis as model of neuronal plasticity in the rat. Ann Anat. 1992;174(05):419–433. doi: 10.1016/s0940-9602(11)80266-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kumral T L, Uyar Y, Berkiten G et al. How to rehabilitate long-term facial paralysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(03):831–835. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bernat I, Grayeli A B, Esquia G, Zhang Z, Kalamarides M, Sterkers O. Intraoperative electromyography and surgical observations as predictive factors of facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(02):306–312. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181be6228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Myckatyn T M, Mackinnon S E. A review of facial nerve anatomy. Semin Plast Surg. 2004;18(01):5–12. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-823118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lang J. Anatomy of the brainstem and the lower cranial nerves, vessels, and surrounding structures. Am J Otol. 1985:1–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ohata K, Tsuyuguchi N, Morino Met al. A hypothesis of epiarachnoidal growth of vestibular schwannoma at the cerebello-pontine angle: surgical importance J Postgrad Med 20024804253–258., discussion 258–259 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951;74(04):491–516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Piccirillo E, Wiet M R, Flanagan S et al. Cystic vestibular schwannoma: classification, management, and facial nerve outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(06):826–834. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b04e18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Osborn A G, Thurnher M M. Salt Lake City: Elsevier; 2013. Section 4: Skull, scalp, and meninges. Meningioma; pp. 1166–1171. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Vries M, Hogendoorn P C, Briaire-de Bruyn I, Malessy M J, van der Mey A G. Intratumoral hemorrhage, vessel density, and the inflammatory reaction contribute to volume increase of sporadic vestibular schwannomas. Virchows Arch. 2012;460(06):629–636. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1236-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Vries W M, Briaire-de Bruijn I H, van Benthem P PG, van der Mey A GL, Hogendoorn P CW. M-CSF and IL-34 expression as indicators for growth in sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Virchows Arch. 2019;474(03):375–381. doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2503-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES