Abstract
Background
Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are frequent healthcare-associated infections and an important cause of death.
Aim
To analyse changes in CRBSI epidemiology observed by the Infection Control Catalan Programme (VINCat).
Methods
A cohort study including all hospital-acquired CRBSI episodes diagnosed at 55 hospitals (2007–2019) in Catalonia, Spain, was prospectively conducted. CRBSI incidence rates were adjusted per 1,000 patient days. To assess the CRBSI rate trend per year, negative binomial models were used, with the number of events as the dependent variable, and the year as the main independent variable. From each model, the annual rate of CRBSI diagnosed per 1,000 patient days and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.
Results
During the study, 9,290 CRBSI episodes were diagnosed (mean annual incidence rate: 0.20 episodes/1,000 patient days). Patients’ median age was 64.1 years; 36.6% (3,403/9,290) were female. In total, 73.7% (n = 6,845) of CRBSI occurred in non-intensive care unit (ICU) wards, 62.7% (n = 5,822) were related to central venous catheter (CVC), 24.1% (n = 2,236) to peripheral venous catheters (PVC) and 13.3% (n = 1,232) to peripherally-inserted central venous catheters (PICVC). Incidence rate fell over the study period (IRR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.93–0.96), especially in the ICU (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87–0.89). As a whole, while episodes of CVC CRBSI fell significantly (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87–0.91), peripherally-inserted catheter CRBSI (PVC and PICVC) rose, especially in medical wards (IRR PICVC: 1.08; 95%CI: 1.05–1.11; IRR PVC: 1.03; 95% 1.00-1.05).
Conclusions
Over the study, CRBSIs associated with CVC and diagnosed in ICUs decreased while episodes in conventional wards involving peripherally-inserted catheters increased. Hospitals should implement preventive measures in conventional wards.
Keywords: catheter-related bloodstream infection, epidemiology, bundle, peripheral catheter, nosocomial infection
Introduction
The use of vascular devices in hospitalised patients is essential for their treatment, which frequently involves the administration of drugs and fluids, parenteral nutrition, or haemodialysis. The prevalence of peripheral (PVC) and central (CVC) venous catheter use among hospitalised patients estimated in different European surveys in the last decade is around 70% and 10% respectively [1-3]. In in a prospective cohort study published in 2010, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were the most important complications reported from 15 Spanish hospitals, with 821 bloodstream infections (BSI) episodes, representing almost 25% of all nosocomial BSI [4]. According to a paper from 2006 reporting a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies, the incidence rate of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days generally ranges from 0.1 episodes for PVC to 2.7 episodes for CVC [5].
CRBSI are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with these infections usually have more severe underlying illness and are more likely to have other healthcare-associated infections (HAI) during their admission, with a mortality ranging from 12% to 25%, according to a prospective nationwide surveillance study in the United States (US) from March 1995 through September 2002 [6]. CRBSI are also associated with longer hospital admissions and higher economic costs [7].
The application of prevention programmes in intensive care units (ICU) in recent decades has resulted in significant reductions of CRBSI incidence rates [8]. Bundles of preventive measures have been applied including hand hygiene, use of chlorhexidine alcohol solution for skin antisepsis, full barrier precautions, daily review of need for catheterisation and femoral site avoidance [8].
The Infection Control Catalan Programme (VINCat) was launched in 2006, with the main objective of reducing the incidence of HAI through continuous active monitoring and implementation of preventive programmes. Surveillance of CRBSI at the hospitals in our region is a priority [9]. The aim of this study is to describe the changes in the incidence and epidemiology of CRBSI in the hospitals participating in the VINCat programme over a 13-year period.
Methods
Setting
BSI associated with the use of venous catheters is continuously monitored under the VINCat programme. Participation of hospitals in VINCat is voluntary. All detected nosocomial episodes of CRBSI, which are diagnosed in adult patients at each of the participating hospitals are prospectively followed and reported to the VINCat programme by the infection control teams. The detection of cases is based on the daily evaluation of all patients with positive blood cultures. This information is provided to the infection control team by the microbiology laboratory at each hospital. The application of precise definitions allows the identification of CRBSI.
The 55 Catalan hospitals participating in the VINCat programme are classified into three categories according to complexity and to the number of beds available for hospitalisation: 500 beds or more (Group I), 200 to 499 beds (Group II), and fewer than 200 beds (Group III). A table with the number of hospitals participating in each year of the study, stratified by group, is provided in Supplement S1, with a footnote providing further details on the function of these hospitals.
Data from each hospital are continuously monitored. The annual incidence rates are compared with the hospitals’ records from previous years, and with the aggregate data compiled in the VINCat programme. Results are presented at general clinical sessions and a public annual report is published within the VINCat website [9]. This study presents data from all episodes recorded between January 2007 and December 2019.
Definitions
Terms used in this study are described as follows [10].
Catheter-related bloodstream infection
A bacterial infection in a patient using a venous catheter is defined with the following criteria. It has to be detected with at least one set of blood cultures obtained from a peripheral vein and two sets in the case of habitual skin-colonising microorganisms (coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Micrococcus spp., Propionibacterium acnes, Bacillus spp. and Corynebacterium spp.). These cultures must be associated with clinical manifestations of infection (fever > 37.5 °C, chills and/or hypotension) and the absence of any apparent alternative source of BSI.
These conditions must be accompanied by one or more of the following:
(i) semiquantitative culture of catheter tip (> 15 colony forming units (CFU) per catheter segment) or quantitative culture (> 103 CFU per catheter segment), with detection of the same microorganism as in blood cultures obtained from the peripheral blood;
(ii) quantitative blood cultures with detection of the same microorganism, with a difference of 5:1 or greater between the blood obtained from any of the lumens of a venous catheter and that obtained from a peripheral vein by puncture;
(iii) difference in time to positivity of the blood cultures of above 2 hours between cultures obtained from a peripheral vein and from the lumen of a venous catheter;
(iv) presence of inflammatory signs or purulent secretions in the insertion point or the subcutaneous tunnel of a venous catheter. A culture of the secretion showing growth of the same microorganism as the one detected in the blood cultures is also recommended (but not obligatory);
(v) resolution of clinical signs and symptoms after catheter withdrawal with or without appropriate antibiotic treatment. For the clinical diagnosis of PVC-BSI, the presence of signs of phlebitis is required (induration, pain or signs of inflammation at the insertion point or the catheter route). This last criterion is the only one that is not considered in the point prevalence survey protocol for microbiology confirmed catheter-related infection (CRI3-CVC) [11].
Type of catheter
A CVC is defined as a catheter inserted in a subclavian, jugular or femoral vein, percutaneously (with or without tunneling). Fully implanted catheters (type Port-a-Cath) are not included in the surveillance programme. A peripherally-inserted central venous catheter (PICVC) is a catheter inserted percutaneously through a vein in the forearm (usually a basilica vein). Its distal end reaches the right heart cavities. These catheters are generally used in the same way as conventional CVCs. A PVC is a short- or medium-length catheter inserted percutaneously in a peripheral location (usually an arm or forearm).
Hospital wards
Hospital wards where CRBSI are identified are classified as medical, surgical, or ICUs.
Exclusion criteria
Episodes in the following patients were not included in the study: patients up to 18 years of age; outpatients with a hospital stay of less than 48 hours at time of BSI detection; patients in whom CRBSI was detected at an outpatient service; CRBSI associated with arterial catheters.
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables were presented as the number of cases and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviation (SD) or medians and interquartile range (IQR), depending on whether the distribution was normal or non-normal. Normality of variables was assessed graphically (quantile-quantile-plot and density plots).
The annual incidence rate of CRBSI was obtained by dividing the total number of episodes of CRBSI with the total number of patient days in 1 year and this was then adjusted for 1,000 patient days to give the annual incidence rate of CRBSI diagnosed per 1,000 patient days (annual incidence of CRBSI diagnosed per 1,000 patient days = total number of CRBSIs detected in 1 year x 1,000 /number of patient days).
A negative binomial model was used to assess the trend over the study period of the rate CRBSIs diagnosed at VINCat hospitals per year. The number of admissions per year was used as offset, the number of events (i.e. CRBSI) as the dependent variable, and the year as the main independent variable. The effect of hospital ward, catheter type and the interaction between year and catheter type, catheter use and aetiology were also assessed. Stratified analysis according to hospital ward and catheter type was also performed. From each scenario, the annual incidence rate of CRBSIs diagnosed per 1,000 patient days was reported, as was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). The interpretation of IRR was focused on the annual rate increase or decrease. The expected annual numbers of CRBSIs were plotted.
To estimate catheter days, we obtained the total adult patient days from all the centres during the study period and then multiplied this total by the mean prevalence rate of catheter daily use over this period [12]. All analyses were performed with a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and conducted with the R software version 4.0.2 [13].
Microbiology
Two sets of two blood samples from a peripheral vein are usually obtained from all patients with a suspected BSI. An additional blood sample is also collected through the catheter. When possible, the catheter tip is cultured after removal. Blood samples are processed at the microbiology laboratories of each centre in accordance with standard operating procedures. Every microorganism is identified using standard microbiological techniques at each centre.
Results
During the study period, a total of 9,290 CRBSI episodes were reported (Table 1). The incidence rate was 0.20 episodes/1,000 patient days. Patients’ median age was 64.1 years, and 36.6% of patients were female (information on sex was collected as a binary variable). BSI was diagnosed a median of 10 days (IQR: 6–17) after admission and a median of 3 days (IQR: 0–14) after catheter insertion. In total, 26.3% of episodes occurred in the ICU, while 42.1% and 31.6% were acquired in medical and surgical wards, respectively. Among the whole cohort, 62.7% episodes were related to CVC, 24.1% to PVC and 13.3% to PICVC, while catheter use was distributed as haemodialysis (4.8%), parenteral nutrition (26.6%) and other uses (68.7%). Meanwhile, the most frequent responsible microorganisms were CoNS (39.5%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (24.6%) and Enterobacteriaceae (18.4%). Candida species accounted for 5.9% episodes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 5.2% and Enterococcus spp. 5.0%.
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of annual catheter-related bloodstream infections diagnosed at VINCat hospitals, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290).
| Characteristics | ALL (n = 9,290) |
2007 (n = 741) |
2008 (n = 784) |
2009 (n = 834) |
2010 (n = 775) |
2011 (n = 896) |
2012 (n = 752) |
2013 (n = 588) |
2014 (n = 694) |
2015 (n = 703) |
2016 (n = 678) |
2017 (n = 619) |
2018 (n = 688) |
2019 (n = 538) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | %b | na | % | na | %b | na | %b | ||||
| Patient | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 64.1 (15.7) | 62.2 (16.2) | 61.9 (15.8) | 64.0 (16.2) | 63.7 (15.5) | 63.1 (16.0) | 64.4 (15.4) | 64.2 (14.8) | 64.5 (15.8) | 64.6 (15) | 65.9 (14.9) | 65.2 (15.6) | 65.0 (15.4) | 65.4 (16.4) | |||||||||||||||||
| Female sexc | 3,403 | 36.6 | 286 | 38.6 | 315 | 40.2 | 320 | 38.4 | 311 | 40.1 | 320 | 35.7 | 264 | 35.1 | 206 | 35.0 | 237 | 34.1 | 240 | 34.1 | 244 | 36.0 | 208 | 33.6 | 245 | 35.6 | 207 | 38.5 | |||
| Catheter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Days since catheter insertion, Md (IQR) |
3.0 (0.0–14.0) |
4.0 (0.0–17.5) |
5.0 (1.0–19.0) |
5.0 (1.0–18.0) |
3.0 (0.0–12.0) |
3.0 (0.0–14.0) |
3.0 (0.0–13.0) |
3.0 (0.0–13.0) |
3.0 (0.0–14.0) |
4.0 (0.0–13.0) |
2.0 (0.0–12.8) |
3.0 (0.0–12.0) |
3.0 (0.0–13.0) |
3.0 (0.0–10.0) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Days since admission, Md (IQR) | 10.0 (6.0–17.0) |
10.0 (6.0–17.0) |
11 (7.0–17.0) |
10.0 (6.0–18.0) |
10.0 (6.0–17.0) |
10.0 (5.3–18.0) |
9.0 (6.0–16.0) |
10.0 (6.0–18.0) |
10.0 (5.0–17.0) |
10.0 (6.0–18.0) |
10.0 (6.0–18.0) |
9.0 (6.0–18.0) |
9.0 (5.0–17.0) |
8.0 (5.0–16.0) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Catheter type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CVC | 5,822 | 62.7 | 541 | 73.0 | 616 | 78.6 | 608 | 72.9 | 558 | 72.0 | 605 | 67.5 | 447 | 59.4 | 386 | 65.6 | 417 | 60.1 | 423 | 60.2 | 362 | 53.4 | 321 | 51.9 | 319 | 46.4 | 219 | 40.7 | |||
| PVC | 2,236 | 24.1 | 137 | 18.5 | 117 | 14.9 | 151 | 18.1 | 148 | 19.1 | 205 | 22.9 | 207 | 27.5 | 127 | 21.6 | 160 | 23.1 | 188 | 26.7 | 179 | 26.4 | 179 | 28.9 | 237 | 34.4 | 201 | 37.4 | |||
| PICVC | 1,232 | 13.3 | 63 | 8.5 | 51 | 6.5 | 75 | 8.9 | 69 | 8.9 | 86 | 9.6 | 98 | 13.0 | 75 | 12.8 | 117 | 16.9 | 92 | 13.1 | 137 | 20.2 | 119 | 19.2 | 132 | 19.2 | 118 | 21.9 | |||
| Site of acquisition | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medical ward | 3,911 | 42.1 | 262 | 35.4 | 304 | 38.8 | 318 | 38.1 | 324 | 41.8 | 397 | 44.3 | 318 | 42.3 | 242 | 41.2 | 268 | 38.6 | 297 | 42.2 | 279 | 41.2 | 284 | 45.9 | 345 | 50.1 | 273 | 50.7 | |||
| Surgical ward | 2,934 | 31.6 | 242 | 32.7 | 217 | 27.7 | 264 | 31.7 | 231 | 29.8 | 247 | 27.6 | 238 | 31.6 | 184 | 31.3 | 245 | 35.3 | 240 | 34.1 | 238 | 35.1 | 208 | 33.6 | 213 | 31.0 | 167 | 31.0 | |||
| ICU | 2,445 | 26.3 | 237 | 32 | 263 | 33.5 | 252 | 30.2 | 220 | 28.4 | 252 | 28.1 | 196 | 26.1 | 162 | 27.6 | 181 | 26.1 | 166 | 23.6 | 161 | 23.7 | 127 | 20.5 | 130 | 18.9 | 98 | 18.2 | |||
| Catheter use | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Haemodialysis | 444 | 4.8 | 37 | 4.9 | 52 | 6.6 | 46 | 5.5 | 64 | 8.3 | 60 | 6.7 | 34 | 4.5 | 30 | 5.1 | 25 | 3.6 | 25 | 3.6 | 23 | 3.4 | 16 | 2.6 | 21 | 3.1 | 11 | 2.0 | |||
| PN | 2,467 | 26.6 | 202 | 27.3 | 216 | 27.6 | 253 | 30.3 | 214 | 27.6 | 219 | 24.4 | 195 | 25.9 | 147 | 25 | 180 | 25.9 | 204 | 29 | 181 | 26.7 | 165 | 26.7 | 177 | 25.7 | 114 | 21.2 | |||
| Other | 6,379 | 68.7 | 502 | 67.7 | 516 | 65.8 | 535 | 64.1 | 497 | 64.1 | 617 | 68.9 | 523 | 69.5 | 411 | 69.9 | 489 | 70.5 | 474 | 67.4 | 474 | 69.9 | 438 | 70.8 | 490 | 71.2 | 413 | 76.8 | |||
| Aetiologyd | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CoNS | 3,652 | 39.5 | 345 | 46.6 | 343 | 43.8 | 368 | 44.3 | 316 | 40.8 | 328 | 36.8 | 286 | 38.0 | 233 | 39.6 | 248 | 35.7 | 250 | 35.6 | 268 | 39.6 | 259 | 42.1 | 234 | 34.9 | 174 | 33.6 | |||
| S. aureus | 2,268 | 24.6 | 153 | 20.7 | 165 | 21.0 | 176 | 21.2 | 146 | 18.9 | 201 | 22.5 | 166 | 22.1 | 137 | 23.3 | 186 | 26.8 | 190 | 27.1 | 165 | 24.4 | 156 | 25.4 | 229 | 34.2 | 198 | 38.2 | |||
| Enterobacteriaceae | 1,700 | 18.4 | 110 | 14.9 | 134 | 17.1 | 153 | 18.4 | 157 | 20.3 | 183 | 20.5 | 157 | 20.9 | 104 | 17.7 | 131 | 18.9 | 137 | 19.5 | 131 | 19.4 | 109 | 17.7 | 111 | 16.6 | 83 | 16 | |||
| Enterococcus spp. | 459 | 5.0 | 46 | 6.2 | 29 | 3.7 | 34 | 4.1 | 49 | 6.3 | 58 | 6.5 | 49 | 6.5 | 39 | 6.6 | 41 | 5.9 | 31 | 4.4 | 22 | 3.3 | 18 | 2.9 | 27 | 4.0 | 16 | 3.1 | |||
| Candida spp. | 540 | 5.9 | 41 | 5.5 | 45 | 5.7 | 51 | 6.1 | 45 | 5.8 | 56 | 6.3 | 43 | 5.7 | 34 | 5.8 | 42 | 6.1 | 42 | 5.9 | 47 | 6.9 | 36 | 5.8 | 31 | 4.6 | 27 | 5.2 | |||
| P. aeruginosa | 483 | 5.2 | 36 | 4.9 | 46 | 5.9 | 30 | 3.6 | 50 | 6.5 | 55 | 6.2 | 44 | 5.8 | 39 | 6.6 | 38 | 5.5 | 48 | 6.8 | 36 | 5.3 | 27 | 4.4 | 20 | 2.9 | 14 | 2.7 | |||
| Other | 135 | 1.5 | 9 | 1.2 | 22 | 2.8 | 19 | 2.9 | 11 | 1.4 | 11 | 1.2 | 7 | 0.9 | 2 | 0.3 | 8 | 1.2 | 4 | 0.6 | 8 | 1.2 | 10 | 1.6 | 18 | 2.7 | 6 | 1.2 | |||
CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; Md: median; P. aeruginosa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; PN: parenteral nutrition; PVC: peripheral venous catheter; S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus; SD: standard deviation; VINCat: Infection Control Catalan Programme.
a Numbers of counts are presented in this column, unless otherwise specified by the row header.
b Percentages are presented in this column, unless otherwise specified by the row header.
c Information on sex was collected as a binary variable.
d Data on aetiology were missing for 53 catheter-related bloodstream infections, including one in 2007, three in 2009, one in 2010, four in 2011, one in 2015, one in 2016, four in 2017, 18 in 2018 and 20 in 2019.
Annual incidence trends
The annual incidence rate of CRBSI fell from 0.29 episodes per 1,000 patient days in 2007 to 0.13 in 2019 (IRR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.93–0.96) (Table 2). This downward trend was mostly associated with the progressive decrease in the annual incidence rate of CVC CRBSI, which ranged from 0.22 per 1,000 patient days in 2007 (507 episodes) to 0.05 (217 episodes) in 2019 (Figure 1A). A downward trend in CRBSI episodes acquired in the ICU was also observed during the study period, from 2.33 to 0.5 episodes/1,000 patient days (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87–0.89), while the annual incidence rate of episodes acquired in medical and surgical wards presented significantly lower decreases (IRR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.96–0.98 and IRR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.95–0.98, respectively). Incidence rates of episodes acquired in the ICU, regardless of catheter type (CVC, PVC or PICVC), followed a downward trend. Meanwhile, in the medical wards annual incidence rates of CVC BSI fell significantly (IRR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.89–0.92) but those of PVC and PICVC increased (IRR: 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00–1.05 and IRR: 1.08; 95%CI: 1.05–1.11, respectively). In the surgical wards, CVC episodes fell significantly (IRR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.93–0.96) while CRBSI associated with PICVC increased (IRR: 1.05; 95%CI: 1.01–1.09) (Figure 1B, Table 2).
Table 2. Annual incidence rate per 1,000 patient days of catheter-related bloodstream infections diagnosed at VINCat hospitals stratifying by hospital ward and catheter type, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290).
| Variables | Incidencea | IRR (95%CI)c | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |||
| Number of CRBSI episodesb | 692 | 763 | 695 | 658 | 652 | 750 | 578 | 688 | 703 | 678 | 619 | 688 | 533 | ||
| Number of patient days | 2,347.947 | 2,991,053 | 2,970,611 | 3,067,156 | 3,161,235 | 3,416,998 | 3,497,772 | 3,700,237 | 3,818,378 | 3,817,357 | 3,855,069 | 3,936,649 | 3,953,391 | ||
| ICU | CVC | 2.01 | 1.96 | 1.48 | 1.3 | 1.15 | 1.06 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.87 (0.86–0.88) |
| PVC | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.92 (0.88–0.96) | |
| PICVC | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.97 (0.94–1) | |
| Subtotal | 2.33 | 2.22 | 1.81 | 1.55 | 1.39 | 1.29 | 1.0 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.88 (0.87–0.89) | |
| Medical wards | CVC | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.90 (0.89–0.92) |
| PVC | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 1.03 (1.00 –1.05) | |
| PICVC | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.08 (1.05–1.11) | |
| Subtotal | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | |
| Surgical wards | CVC | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.94 (0.93–0.96) |
| PVC | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.98 (0.94–1.02) | |
| PICVC | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1.05 (1.01–1.09) | |
| Subtotal | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.97 (0.95–0.98) | |
| Total | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.94 (0.93–0.96) | |
CI: confidence interval; CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection; CVC: central venous catheter; ICU: intensive care unit; IRR: incidence rate ratio; PVC: peripheral venous catheter; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; VINCat: Infection Control Catalan Programme.
a Incidence rates per 1,000 patient days for each year of the study are presented in the columns, unless otherwise specified by the row header.
b Episodes diagnosed in hospitals, where the number of patient days were available.
c Incidence risk ratio by year (with the inclusion of CRBSI episodes diagnosed in hospitals, for which patient days were available that year).
Figure 1.
Annual incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection adjusted per 1,000 patient days stratified by (A) catheter type and (B) hospital unit type, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290)
CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection; CVC: central venous catheter; PIVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheters; PVC: peripheral venous catheters.
An estimation of incidence rate of CRBSI adjusted per 1,000 catheter days was carried out to overcome possible bias associated with catheter use, and a significant downward trend in the incidence rates of CRBSI associated to CVC was also observed, both in ICUs and conventional wards (Supplement S1).
Interaction between years and episode characteristics
The interactions between year and catheter type or catheter use were respectively statistically significant (Figure 2A, Figure 2B, Table3). For catheter use, significance was observed despite the absolute number of episodes of all three categories (parenteral nutrition, haemodialysis and other uses) falling during the study period. On the other hand, the category of ‘other uses’ increased compared with the other two (Table 3). The interaction between year and aetiology was statistically significant, with a significant downward trend in the rate of episodes caused by CoNS. Simultaneously, incidence rates of S. aureus rose significantly (Figure 2C, Table3). Figure 3 shows the annual incidence rate of CRBSI adjusted per 1,000 patient days stratified by catheter type, catheter use and microorganism.
Figure 2.
Number of expected catheter-related bloodstream infection per year, stratified by (A) catheter type, (B) catheter use and (C) aetiology, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290)
CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; PIVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheters; PVC: peripheral venous catheters.
Gram-negative bacilli include Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Table 3. Negative binomial model with interaction between years and episode characteristics, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290).
| Predictors | IRR | CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction between years and catheter types | |||
| Intercept | 0.00 | 0.00–0.00 | < 0.001 |
| Year | 0.91 | 0.90–0.92 | < 0.001 |
| PICVC vs CVC | 0.20 | 0.16–0.23 | < 0.001 |
| PVC vs CVC | 0.09 | 0.07–0.11 | < 0.001 |
| Interaction between PICVC and year | 1.11 | 1.08–1.14 | < 0.001 |
| Interaction between PVC and year | 1.14 | 1.12–1.17 | < 0.001 |
| Interaction between years and catheter use | |||
| Intercept | 0.00 | 0.00–0.00 | < 0.001 |
| Year | 0.93 | 0.92–0.94 | < 0.001 |
| Other uses vs haemodialysis/PN | 1.71 | 1.47–1.98 | < 0.001 |
| Interaction between other uses and year | 1.04 | 1.02–1.06 | < 0.001 |
| Interaction between years and aetiology | |||
| Intercept | 0.00 | 0.00–0.00 | < 0.001 |
| Year | 0.93 | 0.92–0.95 | < 0.001 |
| Staphylococcus aureus vs CoNS | 0.41 | 0.34–0.49 | < 0.001 |
| Gram-negative bacilli vs CoNS | 0.51 | 0.43–0.61 | < 0.001 |
| Other vs CoNS | 0.17 | 0.14–0.22 | < 0.001 |
| Interaction between Staphylococcus aureus and year | 1.07 | 1.04–1.09 | < 0.001 |
| Interaction between Gram-negative bacteria and year | 1.02 | 0.99–1.04 | 0.138 |
| Interaction between other pathogens and year | 0.99 | 0.96–1.02 | 0.405 |
CI: confidence interval; CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; IRR: incidence rates ratios; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; PN: parenteral nutrition; PVC: peripheral venous catheter.
Gram-negative bacilli include Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Figure 3.
Annual incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection adjusted per 1,000 patient days stratified by (A) catheter type and aetiology and (B) catheter type and use, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290)
CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection; CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; PVC: peripheral venous catheter.
Discussion
This study is a comprehensive description of the changes in the epidemiology of CRBSI at hospitals in our healthcare region in Spain. Our large series of CRBSI reveals a significant increase in the incidence rate of PVC and PICVC CRBSI in conventional wards, in parallel to a notable reduction in all CRBSI in ICUs.
During the study period, three interventional programmes were implemented in hospitals belonging to the VINCat. First, since 2007 the comparative results (benchmarking) of CRBSI surveillance are shared with professionals involved in prevention of complications associated with vascular catheters [14]. As was already demonstrated in 1985 by a study in the US, implementation of intensive infection surveillance and control programmes can reduce the rate of nosocomial infections by up to 30% [15].
The second intervention implemented at our hospitals was the so-called ‘Bacteraemia Zero Programme’. It started in 2009 at 192 Spanish ICUs, including all in hospitals in Group I and resulted in a reduction in the risk of CRBSI of 50% in 18 months [16]. Consistently, in recent years, prevention programmes in ICUs have enabled to bring down CVC CRBSI incidence rates. One of the most influential of these programmes was implemented in 2004 in 103 ICUs from 67 Michigan hospitals, as described by Pronovost et al. [8]. These authors reported a 66% reduction in CRBSI rates, which fell to zero infections per 1,000 catheter days 18 months after the programme start [8]. A meta-analysis including 43 studies, published in 2014, also showed a decrease in CVC CRBSI incidence rates after the implementation of prevention programmes in ICUs [17]. Therefore, the impact of these programmes in ICUs is beyond doubt.
The third intervention implemented in VINCat hospitals was conducted in 2010 and included the monitoring of CRBSI related to all PVC and CVC catheters inserted at conventional wards of 11 hospitals of the VINCat programme [18]. Studies assessing the incidence rate of CRBSI in conventional wards compared to ICU present a wide range of results [19-21]. In our study, the incidence rate of CVC CRBSI in the ICU was higher than that observed in conventional settings, but the difference between the rates fell over the course of the study period. In the present study we also found an upward trend in the PVC CRBSI incidence rate in medical wards, in agreement with recent prospective studies [22-25].
Our results suggest the need for programmes in conventional wards to prevent PVC CRBSI, similar to the ones conducted in ICUs in recent years. Indeed, a multimodal intervention performed in conventional wards of a selection of Spanish hospitals was associated with a reduction of CVC CRBSI incidence in this setting. However, no impact on PVC CRBSI incidence was observed. It was concluded that compliance with the bundles related to catheter insertion and maintenance was lower for PVCs, probably due to the lower perception of risk of complications with their use [18]. However, we stress that other similar experiences achieved significant reductions in PVC CRBSI incidence rates in conventional settings [26-28].
In this study, the incidence rate of CRBSI caused by CoNS followed a downward trend, in agreement with a previous report [29]. In contrast, it was observed that, relative to the CoNS, the Gram-negative bacilli incidence increased, as recently described elsewhere [25,30]; the risk was associated with solid organ transplantation, prior use of antibiotics, previous neurological or gastrointestinal conditions, and longer hospital stay [25,29,31]. Although femoral catheters have also been associated with higher infection rates due to Gram-negative bacilli [8,32], we did not observe this relationship (data not shown), perhaps because prevention programmes in recent years have argued against their use and their insertion is less frequent today than in the past [33]. Other studies have underlined the importance of hand hygiene to prevent CRBSI caused by Gram-negative bacteria [28].
Similarly, S. aureus CRBSI episodes also increased during the study period. These episodes are frequently associated with catheters inserted in emergency rooms, where contamination during catheter insertion is frequent [17,34]. Interestingly, most cases of CRBSI in our study were diagnosed within the first days after hospital admission and catheter insertion. The rapidity of the occurrence of these episodes was probably due to the lack of aseptic conditions at the time of insertion, while the episodes that occurred later on were associated with catheter maintenance [22]. This means that special attention should be paid to these catheters. Notably, interventions applied to reduce the incidence of CRBSI have a greater impact on episodes caused by S. aureus [26,27] and Gram-negative bacilli [28] than those caused by other pathogens.
The main limitation of the study is the lack of clinical information regarding the presence of chronic diseases or other health disorders that might have influenced the risk of CRBSI. In addition, CRBSI incidence rates were adjusted by patient days and not by catheter days, as this strategy would not be achievable for surveillance of all types of catheters inserted at all hospital wards, and not only in ICUs. To overcome a possible bias associated to catheter use, we estimated the incidence of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days, which gave similar results as the adjustment by patient days. Also, due to the multicentre nature of the study, the interventions and control programmes may not have been homogeneous across the different hospitals. To overcome this limitation, the VINCat programme attempts to standardise definitions and preventive actions. In addition, the reported data are audited annually, and deviations are analysed together with the person in charge at each centre.
Conclusion
This surveillance programme enabled us to trace the changes in the epidemiology of CRBSI, which remains an important HAI. The present study highlights the need for interventional programmes focusing on PVC, especially in non-ICU wards. Our group is currently leading a prospective preventive programme at hospitals in Catalonia that aims to reduce the rate of CRBSI in conventional wards.
Ethical statement
Participation in the VINCat programme is voluntary at a hospital level. Data confidentiality is guaranteed. This study was evaluated and approved by the Parc Taulí Hospital Research Ethics Committee. The study did not require ethical approval or informed consent statement.
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out as part of LBC’s doctoral thesis in Medicine of Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Department of Medicine). OG received a personal research grant from the “Pla estratègic de recerca i innovació en salut (PERIS) 2019-2021” (Departament de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya). This work was supported by Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Expedient: PI20/01563, the Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa (REIPI) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0037), an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Additional members of the VINCat Programme: We thank members of the VinCat program for the surveillance and collection of CRBSI data at each hospital. These members include Alfredo Jover, Dolors Castellana, Montserrat Olona, Antonia García Pino, Josep Rebull Fatsini, Mª France Domènech, Miquel Pujol, Ana Hornero, Carmen Ardanuy Tisaire, Dàmaris Berbel Palau, Joaquín López-Contreras, Engracia Fernández, Xavier Salgado, Dolors Domènech, Ana Lérida, Lydia Martin, Nieves Sopena, Irma Casas Garcia, Rafel Pérez, Encarna Maraver, Eva Palau, Pepi Serrats, José Antonio Martínez, Gemina Santana, Ana Martínez, Lourdes Ferrer, Mª José Moreno, Esther Calbo, Carolina Porta, Alex Smithson, Maria de la Roca Toda, Teresa Aliu, Susanna Camps, Montserrat Ortega, Vicens Diaz-Brito, Encarna Moreno, Carme Agustí, Miquel Perea Garcia, Marta Andrés, Laura Grau Palafox, Raquel Carrera, Anna Besolí, Juan Pablo Horcajada, Cristina Gonzalez, Jordi Cuquet, Demelsa Maria Maldonado López, Rosa Benítez, Mireia Duch, David Blancas, Esther Moreno, Naiara Villalba, Sara Martínez, Àngels García Flores, Roser Ferrer, Josep Bisbe, Montse Blascó, Antoni Castro Salom, Ana Felisa López, Joan Espinach Alvarós, Àngels Perez, David Castander, Elisabet Calaf, Mercè Clarós, Núria Bosch Ros, Irene Montardit, Roser Porta, Pilar De la Cruz Sol, Mª Rosa Coll Colell, Rosa García Penche Sanches, Josep Maria Tricas, Eva Redon, Montse Brugués, Laura Linares, Maria Cusco, Mª Pilar Barrufet‚ Elena Vidal, Sandra Barbadillo, Mariló Marimón, Yolanda Meije, Montserrat Vaqué, M. Rosa Laplace Enguinados, Blanca Vila, Ana Guadalupe Coloma, Lucrecia López, Magda Campins, Benito Almirante, Carme Ferrer, Natalia Juan Serra, Josep Farguell Carrera, Àngels Garc¡a Flores, Roser Ferrer, Marta Milian Sanz, Alexandra Moise, Ana Mª Jiménez Zarate, M. Carmen Eito Navasal, Maria Gracia Garcia Ramirez, Ana Mª Jiménez Zarate, Mar Armario Fernández.
Funding
Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Expedient: PI20/01563.
Supplementary Data
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Authors’ contributions: Laia Badia-Cebada analysed data and wrote the article,
Judit Peñafiel did the statistical analysis
Patrick Saliba, Enric Limón and Miquel Pujol coordinate the VinCat Program and participated with the data analyses
Marta Andrés, Jordi Càmara, Dolors Domenech, Emili Jiménez-Martínez, Anna Marrón, Encarna Moreno, Virginia Pomar, Montserrat Vaqué, Úrsula Masats and Oriol Gasch are members of the Catheter-related infections study group.
Oriol Gasch leaded the study and the analyses and wrote the article.
References
- 1. Zarb P, Coignard B, Griskeviciene J, Muller A, Vankerckhoven V, Weist K, et al. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) pilot point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(46):20316. 10.2807/ese.17.46.20316-en [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sociedad Española de Medicina Preventiva. Estudio EPINE-EPPS no 30: 2019. Estud EPiNE. 2019;
- 3. Zingg W, Metsini A, Balmelli C, Neofytos D, Behnke M, Gardiol C, et al. National point prevalence survey on healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals, Switzerland, 2017. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(32). 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.32.1800603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rodríguez-Baño J, López-Prieto MD, Portillo MM, Retamar P, Natera C, Nuño E, et al. Epidemiology and clinical features of community-acquired, healthcare-associated and nosocomial bloodstream infections in tertiary-care and community hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(9):1408-13. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03089.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(9):1159-71. 10.4065/81.9.1159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(3):309-17. 10.1086/421946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Stevens V, Geiger K, Concannon C, Nelson RE, Brown J, Dumyati G. Inpatient costs, mortality and 30-day re-admission in patients with central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(5):O318-24. 10.1111/1469-0691.12407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-32. 10.1056/NEJMoa061115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.VinCat. Barcelona: Catalan Health Service. [Accessed: 19 Apr 2022]. Available from. https://catsalut.gencat.cat/ca/proveidors-professionals/vincat/index.html#googtrans(ca%7Cen)
- 10.Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Programme at Catalan Hospitals (VINCat). 2015 Manual. 2015 Available from: https://catsalut.gencat.cat/web/.content/minisite/vincat/documents/manuals/Manual-VINCat-2015-english.pdf
- 11.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals. Protocol version 5.3. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/PPS-HAI-antimicrobial-use-EU-acute-care-hospitals-V5-3.pdf
- 12. Trinh TT, Chan PA, Edwards O, Hollenbeck B, Huang B, Burdick N, et al. Peripheral venous catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(6):579-83. 10.1086/660099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria [Google Scholar]
- 14. Almirante B, Limón E, Freixas N, Gudiol F, VINCat Program . Laboratory-based surveillance of hospital-acquired catheter-related bloodstream infections in Catalonia. Results of the VINCat Program (2007-2010). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012;30(Suppl 3):13-9. 10.1016/S0213-005X(12)70091-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG, Munn VP, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(2):182-205. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Palomar M, Álvarez-Lerma F, Riera A, Díaz MT, Torres F, Agra Y, et al. Bacteremia Zero Working Group . Impact of a national multimodal intervention to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection in the ICU: the Spanish experience. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2364-72. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182923622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Blot K, Bergs J, Vogelaers D, Blot S, Vandijck D. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(1):96-105. 10.1093/cid/ciu239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Freixas N, Bella F, Limón E, Pujol M, Almirante B, Gudiol F. Impact of a multimodal intervention to reduce bloodstream infections related to vascular catheters in non-ICU wards: a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(9):838-44. 10.1111/1469-0691.12049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Marschall J, Leone C, Jones M, Nihill D, Fraser VJ, Warren DK. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections in general medical patients outside the intensive care unit: a surveillance study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(8):905-9. 10.1086/519206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Zingg W, Sax H, Inan C, Cartier V, Diby M, Clergue F, et al. Hospital-wide surveillance of catheter-related bloodstream infection: from the expected to the unexpected. J Hosp Infect. 2009;73(1):41-6. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tedja R, Gordon SM, Fatica C, Fraser TG. The descriptive epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infection among patients in non-intensive care unit settings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(2):164-8. 10.1086/674856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mermel LA. Short-term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(10):1757-62. 10.1093/cid/cix562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Pujol M, Hornero A, Saballs M, Argerich MJ, Verdaguer R, Cisnal M, et al. Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2007;67(1):22-9. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guembe M, Pérez-Granda MJ, Capdevila JA, Barberán J, Pinilla B, Martín-Rabadán P, et al. NUVE Study Group . Nationwide study on peripheral-venous-catheter-associated-bloodstream infections in internal medicine departments. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97(3):260-6. 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ripa M, Morata L, Rodríguez-Núñez O, Cardozo C, Puerta-Alcalde P, Hernández-Meneses M, et al. Short-term peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: Evidence for increasing prevalence of Gram-negative microorganisms from a 25-year prospective observational study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(11):e00892-18. 10.1128/AAC.00892-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Saliba P, Hornero A, Cuervo G, Grau I, Jimenez E, Berbel D, et al. Interventions to decrease short-term peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: impact on incidence and mortality. J Hosp Infect. 2018;100(3):e178-86. 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Rhodes D, Cheng AC, McLellan S, Guerra P, Karanfilovska D, Aitchison S, et al. Reducing Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections associated with peripheral intravenous cannulae: successful implementation of a care bundle at a large Australian health service. J Hosp Infect. 2016;94(1):86-91. 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Garcia-Gasalla M, Arrizabalaga-Asenjo M, Collado-Giner C, Ventayol-Aguiló L, Socias-Mir A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez A, et al. Results of a multi-faceted educational intervention to prevent peripheral venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections. J Hosp Infect. 2019;102(4):449-53. 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Braun E, Hussein K, Geffen Y, Rabino G, Bar-Lavie Y, Paul M. Predominance of Gram-negative bacilli among patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(10):O627-9. 10.1111/1469-0691.12565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Marcos M, Soriano A, Iñurrieta A, Martínez JA, Romero A, Cobos N, et al. Changing epidemiology of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: increasing prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):2119-25. 10.1093/jac/dkr231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Bouza E, Eworo A, Fernández Cruz A, Reigadas E, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Muñoz P. Catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. J Hosp Infect. 2013;85(4):316-20. 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lorente L, Jiménez A, Santana M, Iribarren JL, Jiménez JJ, Martín MM, et al. Microorganisms responsible for intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection according to the catheter site. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(10):2424-7. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000284589.63641.B8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee . Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(4) Suppl 1;S1-34. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Stuart RL, Cameron DR, Scott C, Kotsanas D, Grayson ML, Korman TM, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: more than 5 years of prospective data from two tertiary health services. Med J Aust. 2013;198(10):551-3. 10.5694/mja12.11699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



