Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2022 May 12;27(19):2100610. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.19.2100610

Trends in the epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infections; towards a paradigm shift, Spain, 2007 to 2019

Laia Badia-Cebada 1,2, Judit Peñafiel 3, Patrick Saliba 4, Marta Andrés 5, Jordi Càmara 6,7,8, Dolors Domenech 9, Emili Jiménez-Martínez 10, Anna Marrón 11, Encarna Moreno 12, Virginia Pomar 13, Montserrat Vaqué 14, Enric Limón 4, Úrsula Masats 15, Miquel Pujol 16,17, Oriol Gasch 2, 11, 18; on behalf of the VINCat programme (Infection Control Catalan Programme)19
PMCID: PMC9101967  PMID: 35551704

Abstract

Background

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are frequent healthcare-associated infections and an important cause of death.

Aim

To analyse changes in CRBSI epidemiology observed by the Infection Control Catalan Programme (VINCat).

Methods

A cohort study including all hospital-acquired CRBSI episodes diagnosed at 55 hospitals (2007–2019) in Catalonia, Spain, was prospectively conducted. CRBSI incidence rates were adjusted per 1,000 patient days. To assess the CRBSI rate trend per year, negative binomial models were used, with the number of events as the dependent variable, and the year as the main independent variable. From each model, the annual rate of CRBSI diagnosed per 1,000 patient days and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

Results

During the study, 9,290 CRBSI episodes were diagnosed (mean annual incidence rate: 0.20 episodes/1,000 patient days). Patients’ median age was 64.1 years; 36.6% (3,403/9,290) were female. In total, 73.7% (n = 6,845) of CRBSI occurred in non-intensive care unit (ICU) wards, 62.7% (n = 5,822) were related to central venous catheter (CVC), 24.1% (n = 2,236) to peripheral venous catheters (PVC) and 13.3% (n = 1,232) to peripherally-inserted central venous catheters (PICVC). Incidence rate fell over the study period (IRR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.93–0.96), especially in the ICU (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87–0.89). As a whole, while episodes of CVC CRBSI fell significantly (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87–0.91), peripherally-inserted catheter CRBSI (PVC and PICVC) rose, especially in medical wards (IRR PICVC: 1.08; 95%CI: 1.05–1.11; IRR PVC: 1.03; 95% 1.00-1.05).

Conclusions

Over the study, CRBSIs associated with CVC and diagnosed in ICUs decreased while episodes in conventional wards involving peripherally-inserted catheters increased. Hospitals should implement preventive measures in conventional wards.

Keywords: catheter-related bloodstream infection, epidemiology, bundle, peripheral catheter, nosocomial infection

Introduction

The use of vascular devices in hospitalised patients is essential for their treatment, which frequently involves the administration of drugs and fluids, parenteral nutrition, or haemodialysis. The prevalence of peripheral (PVC) and central (CVC) venous catheter use among hospitalised patients estimated in different European surveys in the last decade is around 70% and 10% respectively [1-3]. In in a prospective cohort study published in 2010, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were the most important complications reported from 15 Spanish hospitals, with 821 bloodstream infections (BSI) episodes, representing almost 25% of all nosocomial BSI [4]. According to a paper from 2006 reporting a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies, the incidence rate of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days generally ranges from 0.1 episodes for PVC to 2.7 episodes for CVC [5].

CRBSI are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with these infections usually have more severe underlying illness and are more likely to have other healthcare-associated infections (HAI) during their admission, with a mortality ranging from 12% to 25%, according to a prospective nationwide surveillance study in the United States (US) from March 1995 through September 2002 [6]. CRBSI are also associated with longer hospital admissions and higher economic costs [7].

The application of prevention programmes in intensive care units (ICU) in recent decades has resulted in significant reductions of CRBSI incidence rates [8]. Bundles of preventive measures have been applied including hand hygiene, use of chlorhexidine alcohol solution for skin antisepsis, full barrier precautions, daily review of need for catheterisation and femoral site avoidance [8].

The Infection Control Catalan Programme (VINCat) was launched in 2006, with the main objective of reducing the incidence of HAI through continuous active monitoring and implementation of preventive programmes. Surveillance of CRBSI at the hospitals in our region is a priority [9]. The aim of this study is to describe the changes in the incidence and epidemiology of CRBSI in the hospitals participating in the VINCat programme over a 13-year period.

Methods

Setting

BSI associated with the use of venous catheters is continuously monitored under the VINCat programme. Participation of hospitals in VINCat is voluntary. All detected nosocomial episodes of CRBSI, which are diagnosed in adult patients at each of the participating hospitals are prospectively followed and reported to the VINCat programme by the infection control teams. The detection of cases is based on the daily evaluation of all patients with positive blood cultures. This information is provided to the infection control team by the microbiology laboratory at each hospital. The application of precise definitions allows the identification of CRBSI.

The 55 Catalan hospitals participating in the VINCat programme are classified into three categories according to complexity and to the number of beds available for hospitalisation: 500 beds or more (Group I), 200 to 499 beds (Group II), and fewer than 200 beds (Group III). A table with the number of hospitals participating in each year of the study, stratified by group, is provided in Supplement S1, with a footnote providing further details on the function of these hospitals.

Data from each hospital are continuously monitored. The annual incidence rates are compared with the hospitals’ records from previous years, and with the aggregate data compiled in the VINCat programme. Results are presented at general clinical sessions and a public annual report is published within the VINCat website [9]. This study presents data from all episodes recorded between January 2007 and December 2019.

Definitions

Terms used in this study are described as follows [10].

Catheter-related bloodstream infection

A bacterial infection in a patient using a venous catheter is defined with the following criteria. It has to be detected with at least one set of blood cultures obtained from a peripheral vein and two sets in the case of habitual skin-colonising microorganisms (coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Micrococcus spp., Propionibacterium acnes, Bacillus spp. and Corynebacterium spp.). These cultures must be associated with clinical manifestations of infection (fever > 37.5 °C, chills and/or hypotension) and the absence of any apparent alternative source of BSI.

These conditions must be accompanied by one or more of the following:

(i) semiquantitative culture of catheter tip (> 15 colony forming units (CFU) per catheter segment) or quantitative culture (> 103 CFU per catheter segment), with detection of the same microorganism as in blood cultures obtained from the peripheral blood;

(ii) quantitative blood cultures with detection of the same microorganism, with a difference of 5:1 or greater between the blood obtained from any of the lumens of a venous catheter and that obtained from a peripheral vein by puncture;

(iii) difference in time to positivity of the blood cultures of above 2 hours between cultures obtained from a peripheral vein and from the lumen of a venous catheter;

(iv) presence of inflammatory signs or purulent secretions in the insertion point or the subcutaneous tunnel of a venous catheter. A culture of the secretion showing growth of the same microorganism as the one detected in the blood cultures is also recommended (but not obligatory);

(v) resolution of clinical signs and symptoms after catheter withdrawal with or without appropriate antibiotic treatment. For the clinical diagnosis of PVC-BSI, the presence of signs of phlebitis is required (induration, pain or signs of inflammation at the insertion point or the catheter route). This last criterion is the only one that is not considered in the point prevalence survey protocol for microbiology confirmed catheter-related infection (CRI3-CVC) [11].

Type of catheter

A CVC is defined as a catheter inserted in a subclavian, jugular or femoral vein, percutaneously (with or without tunneling). Fully implanted catheters (type Port-a-Cath) are not included in the surveillance programme. A peripherally-inserted central venous catheter (PICVC) is a catheter inserted percutaneously through a vein in the forearm (usually a basilica vein). Its distal end reaches the right heart cavities. These catheters are generally used in the same way as conventional CVCs. A PVC is a short- or medium-length catheter inserted percutaneously in a peripheral location (usually an arm or forearm).

Hospital wards

Hospital wards where CRBSI are identified are classified as medical, surgical, or ICUs.

Exclusion criteria

Episodes in the following patients were not included in the study: patients up to 18 years of age; outpatients with a hospital stay of less than 48 hours at time of BSI detection; patients in whom CRBSI was detected at an outpatient service; CRBSI associated with arterial catheters.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as the number of cases and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviation (SD) or medians and interquartile range (IQR), depending on whether the distribution was normal or non-normal. Normality of variables was assessed graphically (quantile-quantile-plot and density plots).

The annual incidence rate of CRBSI was obtained by dividing the total number of episodes of CRBSI with the total number of patient days in 1 year and this was then adjusted for 1,000 patient days to give the annual incidence rate of CRBSI diagnosed per 1,000 patient days (annual incidence of CRBSI diagnosed per 1,000 patient days  = total number of CRBSIs detected in 1 year x 1,000 /number of patient days).

A negative binomial model was used to assess the trend over the study period of the rate CRBSIs diagnosed at VINCat hospitals per year. The number of admissions per year was used as offset, the number of events (i.e. CRBSI) as the dependent variable, and the year as the main independent variable. The effect of hospital ward, catheter type and the interaction between year and catheter type, catheter use and aetiology were also assessed. Stratified analysis according to hospital ward and catheter type was also performed. From each scenario, the annual incidence rate of CRBSIs diagnosed per 1,000 patient days was reported, as was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). The interpretation of IRR was focused on the annual rate increase or decrease. The expected annual numbers of CRBSIs were plotted.

To estimate catheter days, we obtained the total adult patient days from all the centres during the study period and then multiplied this total by the mean prevalence rate of catheter daily use over this period [12]. All analyses were performed with a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and conducted with the R software version 4.0.2 [13].

Microbiology

Two sets of two blood samples from a peripheral vein are usually obtained from all patients with a suspected BSI. An additional blood sample is also collected through the catheter. When possible, the catheter tip is cultured after removal. Blood samples are processed at the microbiology laboratories of each centre in accordance with standard operating procedures. Every microorganism is identified using standard microbiological techniques at each centre.

Results

During the study period, a total of 9,290 CRBSI episodes were reported (Table 1). The incidence rate was 0.20 episodes/1,000 patient days. Patients’ median age was 64.1 years, and 36.6% of patients were female (information on sex was collected as a binary variable). BSI was diagnosed a median of 10 days (IQR: 6–17) after admission and a median of 3 days (IQR: 0–14) after catheter insertion. In total, 26.3% of episodes occurred in the ICU, while 42.1% and 31.6% were acquired in medical and surgical wards, respectively. Among the whole cohort, 62.7% episodes were related to CVC, 24.1% to PVC and 13.3% to PICVC, while catheter use was distributed as haemodialysis (4.8%), parenteral nutrition (26.6%) and other uses (68.7%). Meanwhile, the most frequent responsible microorganisms were CoNS (39.5%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (24.6%) and Enterobacteriaceae (18.4%). Candida species accounted for 5.9% episodes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 5.2% and Enterococcus spp. 5.0%.

Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of annual catheter-related bloodstream infections diagnosed at VINCat hospitals, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290).

Characteristics ALL
(n = 9,290)
2007
(n = 741)
2008
(n = 784)
2009
(n = 834)
2010
(n =  775)
2011
(n =  896)
2012
(n = 752)
2013
(n = 588)
2014
(n =  694)
2015
(n = 703)
2016
 (n = 678)
2017
(n = 619)
2018
(n = 688)
2019
(n = 538)
na %b na %b na %b na %b na %b na %b na %b na %b na %b na %b na %b na % na %b na %b
Patient
Age, mean (SD) 64.1 (15.7) 62.2 (16.2) 61.9 (15.8) 64.0 (16.2) 63.7 (15.5) 63.1 (16.0) 64.4 (15.4) 64.2 (14.8) 64.5 (15.8) 64.6 (15) 65.9 (14.9) 65.2 (15.6) 65.0 (15.4) 65.4 (16.4)
Female sexc 3,403 36.6 286 38.6 315 40.2 320 38.4 311 40.1 320 35.7 264 35.1 206 35.0 237 34.1 240 34.1 244 36.0 208 33.6 245 35.6 207 38.5
Catheter
Days since
catheter insertion,
Md (IQR)
3.0
(0.0–14.0)
4.0
(0.0–17.5)
5.0
(1.0–19.0)
5.0
(1.0–18.0)
3.0
(0.0–12.0)
3.0
(0.0–14.0)
3.0
(0.0–13.0)
3.0
(0.0–13.0)
3.0
(0.0–14.0)
4.0
(0.0–13.0)
2.0
(0.0–12.8)
3.0
(0.0–12.0)
3.0
(0.0–13.0)
3.0
(0.0–10.0)
Days since admission, Md (IQR) 10.0
(6.0–17.0)
10.0
(6.0–17.0)
11
(7.0–17.0)
10.0
(6.0–18.0)
10.0
(6.0–17.0)
10.0
(5.3–18.0)
9.0
(6.0–16.0)
10.0
(6.0–18.0)
10.0
(5.0–17.0)
10.0
(6.0–18.0)
10.0
(6.0–18.0)
9.0
(6.0–18.0)
9.0
(5.0–17.0)
8.0
(5.0–16.0)
Catheter type
CVC 5,822 62.7 541 73.0 616 78.6 608 72.9 558 72.0 605 67.5 447 59.4 386 65.6 417 60.1 423 60.2 362 53.4 321 51.9 319 46.4 219 40.7
PVC 2,236 24.1 137 18.5 117 14.9 151 18.1 148 19.1 205 22.9 207 27.5 127 21.6 160 23.1 188 26.7 179 26.4 179 28.9 237 34.4 201 37.4
PICVC 1,232 13.3 63 8.5 51 6.5 75 8.9 69 8.9 86 9.6 98 13.0 75 12.8 117 16.9 92 13.1 137 20.2 119 19.2 132 19.2 118 21.9
Site of acquisition
Medical ward 3,911 42.1 262 35.4 304 38.8 318 38.1 324 41.8 397 44.3 318 42.3 242 41.2 268 38.6 297 42.2 279 41.2 284 45.9 345 50.1 273 50.7
Surgical ward 2,934 31.6 242 32.7 217 27.7 264 31.7 231 29.8 247 27.6 238 31.6 184 31.3 245 35.3 240 34.1 238 35.1 208 33.6 213 31.0 167 31.0
ICU 2,445 26.3 237 32 263 33.5 252 30.2 220 28.4 252 28.1 196 26.1 162 27.6 181 26.1 166 23.6 161 23.7 127 20.5 130 18.9 98 18.2
Catheter use
Haemodialysis 444 4.8 37 4.9 52 6.6 46 5.5 64 8.3 60 6.7 34 4.5 30 5.1 25 3.6 25 3.6 23 3.4 16 2.6 21 3.1 11 2.0
PN 2,467 26.6 202 27.3 216 27.6 253 30.3 214 27.6 219 24.4 195 25.9 147 25 180 25.9 204 29 181 26.7 165 26.7 177 25.7 114 21.2
Other 6,379 68.7 502 67.7 516 65.8 535 64.1 497 64.1 617 68.9 523 69.5 411 69.9 489 70.5 474 67.4 474 69.9 438 70.8 490 71.2 413 76.8
Aetiologyd
CoNS 3,652 39.5 345 46.6 343 43.8 368 44.3 316 40.8 328 36.8 286 38.0 233 39.6 248 35.7 250 35.6 268 39.6 259 42.1 234 34.9 174 33.6
S. aureus 2,268 24.6 153 20.7 165 21.0 176 21.2 146 18.9 201 22.5 166 22.1 137 23.3 186 26.8 190 27.1 165 24.4 156 25.4 229 34.2 198 38.2
Enterobacteriaceae 1,700 18.4 110 14.9 134 17.1 153 18.4 157 20.3 183 20.5 157 20.9 104 17.7 131 18.9 137 19.5 131 19.4 109 17.7 111 16.6 83 16
Enterococcus spp. 459 5.0 46 6.2 29 3.7 34 4.1 49 6.3 58 6.5 49 6.5 39 6.6 41 5.9 31 4.4 22 3.3 18 2.9 27 4.0 16 3.1
Candida spp. 540 5.9 41 5.5 45 5.7 51 6.1 45 5.8 56 6.3 43 5.7 34 5.8 42 6.1 42 5.9 47 6.9 36 5.8 31 4.6 27 5.2
P. aeruginosa 483 5.2 36 4.9 46 5.9 30 3.6 50 6.5 55 6.2 44 5.8 39 6.6 38 5.5 48 6.8 36 5.3 27 4.4 20 2.9 14 2.7
Other 135 1.5 9 1.2 22 2.8 19 2.9 11 1.4 11 1.2 7 0.9 2 0.3 8 1.2 4 0.6 8 1.2 10 1.6 18 2.7 6 1.2

CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; Md: median; P. aeruginosa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; PN: parenteral nutrition; PVC: peripheral venous catheter; S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus; SD: standard deviation; VINCat: Infection Control Catalan Programme.

a Numbers of counts are presented in this column, unless otherwise specified by the row header.

b Percentages are presented in this column, unless otherwise specified by the row header.

c Information on sex was collected as a binary variable.

d Data on aetiology were missing for 53 catheter-related bloodstream infections, including one in 2007, three in 2009, one in 2010, four in 2011, one in 2015, one in 2016, four in 2017, 18 in 2018 and 20 in 2019.

Annual incidence trends

The annual incidence rate of CRBSI fell from 0.29 episodes per 1,000 patient days in 2007 to 0.13 in 2019 (IRR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.93–0.96) (Table 2). This downward trend was mostly associated with the progressive decrease in the annual incidence rate of CVC CRBSI, which ranged from 0.22 per 1,000 patient days in 2007 (507 episodes) to 0.05 (217 episodes) in 2019 (Figure 1A). A downward trend in CRBSI episodes acquired in the ICU was also observed during the study period, from 2.33 to 0.5 episodes/1,000 patient days (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87–0.89), while the annual incidence rate of episodes acquired in medical and surgical wards presented significantly lower decreases (IRR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.96–0.98 and IRR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.95–0.98, respectively). Incidence rates of episodes acquired in the ICU, regardless of catheter type (CVC, PVC or PICVC), followed a downward trend. Meanwhile, in the medical wards annual incidence rates of CVC BSI fell significantly (IRR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.89–0.92) but those of PVC and PICVC increased (IRR: 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00–1.05 and IRR: 1.08; 95%CI: 1.05–1.11, respectively). In the surgical wards, CVC episodes fell significantly (IRR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.93–0.96) while CRBSI associated with PICVC increased (IRR: 1.05; 95%CI: 1.01–1.09) (Figure 1B, Table 2).

Table 2. Annual incidence rate per 1,000 patient days of catheter-related bloodstream infections diagnosed at VINCat hospitals stratifying by hospital ward and catheter type, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290).

  Variables Incidencea IRR (95%CI)c
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Number of CRBSI episodesb 692 763 695 658 652 750 578 688 703 678 619 688 533
Number of patient days 2,347.947 2,991,053 2,970,611 3,067,156 3,161,235 3,416,998 3,497,772 3,700,237 3,818,378 3,817,357 3,855,069 3,936,649 3,953,391
ICU CVC 2.01 1.96 1.48 1.3 1.15 1.06 0.78 0.77 0.62 0.63 0.52 0.46 0.34 0.87 (0.86–0.88)
PVC 0.09 0.14 0.13 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.92 (0.88–0.96)
PICVC 0.23 0.12 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.97 (0.94–1)
Subtotal 2.33 2.22 1.81 1.55 1.39 1.29 1.0 0.98 0.83 0.88 0.68 0.66 0.50 0.88 (0.87–0.89)
Medical wards CVC 0.14 0.13 0.1 0.1 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.90 (0.89–0.92)
PVC 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.07 1.03 (1.00 –1.05)
PICVC 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 1.08 (1.05–1.11)
Subtotal 0.21 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.13 0.97 (0.96–0.98)
Surgical wards CVC 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.94 (0.93–0.96)
PVC 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.98 (0.94–1.02)
PICVC 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 1.05 (1.01–1.09)
Subtotal 0.21 0.17 0.18 0.14 0.13 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.97 (0.95–0.98)
Total 0.29 0.26 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.13 0.94 (0.93–0.96)

CI: confidence interval; CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection; CVC: central venous catheter; ICU: intensive care unit; IRR: incidence rate ratio; PVC: peripheral venous catheter; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; VINCat: Infection Control Catalan Programme.

a Incidence rates per 1,000 patient days for each year of the study are presented in the columns, unless otherwise specified by the row header.

b Episodes diagnosed in hospitals, where the number of patient days were available.

c Incidence risk ratio by year (with the inclusion of CRBSI episodes diagnosed in hospitals, for which patient days were available that year).

Figure 1.

Annual incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection adjusted per 1,000 patient days stratified by (A) catheter type and (B) hospital unit type, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290)

CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection; CVC: central venous catheter; PIVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheters; PVC: peripheral venous catheters.

Figure 1

An estimation of incidence rate of CRBSI adjusted per 1,000 catheter days was carried out to overcome possible bias associated with catheter use, and a significant downward trend in the incidence rates of CRBSI associated to CVC was also observed, both in ICUs and conventional wards (Supplement S1).

Interaction between years and episode characteristics

The interactions between year and catheter type or catheter use were respectively statistically significant (Figure 2A, Figure 2B, Table3). For catheter use, significance was observed despite the absolute number of episodes of all three categories (parenteral nutrition, haemodialysis and other uses) falling during the study period. On the other hand, the category of ‘other uses’ increased compared with the other two (Table 3). The interaction between year and aetiology was statistically significant, with a significant downward trend in the rate of episodes caused by CoNS. Simultaneously, incidence rates of S. aureus rose significantly (Figure 2C, Table3). Figure 3 shows the annual incidence rate of CRBSI adjusted per 1,000 patient days stratified by catheter type, catheter use and microorganism.

Figure 2.

Number of expected catheter-related bloodstream infection per year, stratified by (A) catheter type, (B) catheter use and (C) aetiology, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290)

CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; PIVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheters; PVC: peripheral venous catheters.

Gram-negative bacilli include Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Figure 2

Table 3. Negative binomial model with interaction between years and episode characteristics, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290).

Predictors IRR CI p
Interaction between years and catheter types
Intercept 0.00 0.00–0.00 < 0.001
Year 0.91 0.90–0.92 < 0.001
PICVC vs CVC 0.20 0.16–0.23 < 0.001
PVC vs CVC 0.09 0.07–0.11 < 0.001
Interaction between PICVC and year 1.11 1.08–1.14 < 0.001
Interaction between PVC and year 1.14 1.12–1.17 < 0.001
Interaction between years and catheter use
Intercept 0.00 0.00–0.00 < 0.001
Year 0.93 0.92–0.94 < 0.001
Other uses vs haemodialysis/PN 1.71 1.47–1.98 < 0.001
Interaction between other uses and year 1.04 1.02–1.06 < 0.001
Interaction between years and aetiology
Intercept 0.00 0.00–0.00 < 0.001
Year 0.93 0.92–0.95 < 0.001
Staphylococcus aureus vs CoNS 0.41 0.34–0.49 < 0.001
Gram-negative bacilli vs CoNS 0.51 0.43–0.61 < 0.001
Other vs CoNS 0.17 0.14–0.22 < 0.001
Interaction between Staphylococcus aureus and year 1.07 1.04–1.09 < 0.001
Interaction between Gram-negative bacteria and year 1.02 0.99–1.04 0.138
Interaction between other pathogens and year 0.99 0.96–1.02 0.405

CI: confidence interval; CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; IRR: incidence rates ratios; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; PN: parenteral nutrition; PVC: peripheral venous catheter.

Gram-negative bacilli include Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Figure 3.

Annual incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection adjusted per 1,000 patient days stratified by (A) catheter type and aetiology and (B) catheter type and use, Catalonia, Spain, 2007–2019 (n = 9,290)

CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection; CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; CVC: central venous catheter; PICVC: peripherally-inserted central venous catheter; PVC: peripheral venous catheter.

Figure 3

Discussion

This study is a comprehensive description of the changes in the epidemiology of CRBSI at hospitals in our healthcare region in Spain. Our large series of CRBSI reveals a significant increase in the incidence rate of PVC and PICVC CRBSI in conventional wards, in parallel to a notable reduction in all CRBSI in ICUs.

During the study period, three interventional programmes were implemented in hospitals belonging to the VINCat. First, since 2007 the comparative results (benchmarking) of CRBSI surveillance are shared with professionals involved in prevention of complications associated with vascular catheters [14]. As was already demonstrated in 1985 by a study in the US, implementation of intensive infection surveillance and control programmes can reduce the rate of nosocomial infections by up to 30% [15].

The second intervention implemented at our hospitals was the so-called ‘Bacteraemia Zero Programme’. It started in 2009 at 192 Spanish ICUs, including all in hospitals in Group I and resulted in a reduction in the risk of CRBSI of 50% in 18 months [16]. Consistently, in recent years, prevention programmes in ICUs have enabled to bring down CVC CRBSI incidence rates. One of the most influential of these programmes was implemented in 2004 in 103 ICUs from 67 Michigan hospitals, as described by Pronovost et al. [8]. These authors reported a 66% reduction in CRBSI rates, which fell to zero infections per 1,000 catheter days 18 months after the programme start [8]. A meta-analysis including 43 studies, published in 2014, also showed a decrease in CVC CRBSI incidence rates after the implementation of prevention programmes in ICUs [17]. Therefore, the impact of these programmes in ICUs is beyond doubt.

The third intervention implemented in VINCat hospitals was conducted in 2010 and included the monitoring of CRBSI related to all PVC and CVC catheters inserted at conventional wards of 11 hospitals of the VINCat programme [18]. Studies assessing the incidence rate of CRBSI in conventional wards compared to ICU present a wide range of results [19-21]. In our study, the incidence rate of CVC CRBSI in the ICU was higher than that observed in conventional settings, but the difference between the rates fell over the course of the study period. In the present study we also found an upward trend in the PVC CRBSI incidence rate in medical wards, in agreement with recent prospective studies [22-25].

Our results suggest the need for programmes in conventional wards to prevent PVC CRBSI, similar to the ones conducted in ICUs in recent years. Indeed, a multimodal intervention performed in conventional wards of a selection of Spanish hospitals was associated with a reduction of CVC CRBSI incidence in this setting. However, no impact on PVC CRBSI incidence was observed. It was concluded that compliance with the bundles related to catheter insertion and maintenance was lower for PVCs, probably due to the lower perception of risk of complications with their use [18]. However, we stress that other similar experiences achieved significant reductions in PVC CRBSI incidence rates in conventional settings [26-28].

In this study, the incidence rate of CRBSI caused by CoNS followed a downward trend, in agreement with a previous report [29]. In contrast, it was observed that, relative to the CoNS, the Gram-negative bacilli incidence increased, as recently described elsewhere [25,30]; the risk was associated with solid organ transplantation, prior use of antibiotics, previous neurological or gastrointestinal conditions, and longer hospital stay [25,29,31]. Although femoral catheters have also been associated with higher infection rates due to Gram-negative bacilli [8,32], we did not observe this relationship (data not shown), perhaps because prevention programmes in recent years have argued against their use and their insertion is less frequent today than in the past [33]. Other studies have underlined the importance of hand hygiene to prevent CRBSI caused by Gram-negative bacteria [28].

Similarly, S. aureus CRBSI episodes also increased during the study period. These episodes are frequently associated with catheters inserted in emergency rooms, where contamination during catheter insertion is frequent [17,34]. Interestingly, most cases of CRBSI in our study were diagnosed within the first days after hospital admission and catheter insertion. The rapidity of the occurrence of these episodes was probably due to the lack of aseptic conditions at the time of insertion, while the episodes that occurred later on were associated with catheter maintenance [22]. This means that special attention should be paid to these catheters. Notably, interventions applied to reduce the incidence of CRBSI have a greater impact on episodes caused by S. aureus [26,27] and Gram-negative bacilli [28] than those caused by other pathogens.

The main limitation of the study is the lack of clinical information regarding the presence of chronic diseases or other health disorders that might have influenced the risk of CRBSI. In addition, CRBSI incidence rates were adjusted by patient days and not by catheter days, as this strategy would not be achievable for surveillance of all types of catheters inserted at all hospital wards, and not only in ICUs. To overcome a possible bias associated to catheter use, we estimated the incidence of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days, which gave similar results as the adjustment by patient days. Also, due to the multicentre nature of the study, the interventions and control programmes may not have been homogeneous across the different hospitals. To overcome this limitation, the VINCat programme attempts to standardise definitions and preventive actions. In addition, the reported data are audited annually, and deviations are analysed together with the person in charge at each centre.

Conclusion

This surveillance programme enabled us to trace the changes in the epidemiology of CRBSI, which remains an important HAI. The present study highlights the need for interventional programmes focusing on PVC, especially in non-ICU wards. Our group is currently leading a prospective preventive programme at hospitals in Catalonia that aims to reduce the rate of CRBSI in conventional wards.

Ethical statement

Participation in the VINCat programme is voluntary at a hospital level. Data confidentiality is guaranteed. This study was evaluated and approved by the Parc Taulí Hospital Research Ethics Committee. The study did not require ethical approval or informed consent statement.

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out as part of LBC’s doctoral thesis in Medicine of Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Department of Medicine). OG received a personal research grant from the “Pla estratègic de recerca i innovació en salut (PERIS) 2019-2021” (Departament de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya). This work was supported by Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Expedient: PI20/01563, the Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa (REIPI) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0037), an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Additional members of the VINCat Programme: We thank members of the VinCat program for the surveillance and collection of CRBSI data at each hospital. These members include Alfredo Jover, Dolors Castellana, Montserrat Olona, Antonia García Pino, Josep Rebull Fatsini, Mª France Domènech, Miquel Pujol, Ana Hornero, Carmen Ardanuy Tisaire, Dàmaris Berbel Palau, Joaquín López-Contreras, Engracia Fernández, Xavier Salgado, Dolors Domènech, Ana Lérida, Lydia Martin, Nieves Sopena, Irma Casas Garcia, Rafel Pérez, Encarna Maraver, Eva Palau, Pepi Serrats, José Antonio Martínez, Gemina Santana, Ana Martínez, Lourdes Ferrer, Mª José Moreno, Esther Calbo, Carolina Porta, Alex Smithson, Maria de la Roca Toda, Teresa Aliu, Susanna Camps, Montserrat Ortega, Vicens Diaz-Brito, Encarna Moreno, Carme Agustí, Miquel Perea Garcia, Marta Andrés, Laura Grau Palafox, Raquel Carrera, Anna Besolí, Juan Pablo Horcajada, Cristina Gonzalez, Jordi Cuquet, Demelsa Maria Maldonado López, Rosa Benítez, Mireia Duch, David Blancas, Esther Moreno, Naiara Villalba, Sara Martínez, Àngels García Flores, Roser Ferrer, Josep Bisbe, Montse Blascó, Antoni Castro Salom, Ana Felisa López, Joan Espinach Alvarós, Àngels Perez, David Castander, Elisabet Calaf, Mercè Clarós, Núria Bosch Ros, Irene Montardit, Roser Porta, Pilar De la Cruz Sol, Mª Rosa Coll Colell, Rosa García Penche Sanches, Josep Maria Tricas, Eva Redon, Montse Brugués, Laura Linares, Maria Cusco, Mª Pilar Barrufet‚ Elena Vidal, Sandra Barbadillo, Mariló Marimón, Yolanda Meije, Montserrat Vaqué, M. Rosa Laplace Enguinados, Blanca Vila, Ana Guadalupe Coloma, Lucrecia López, Magda Campins, Benito Almirante, Carme Ferrer, Natalia Juan Serra, Josep Farguell Carrera, Àngels Garc¡a Flores, Roser Ferrer, Marta Milian Sanz, Alexandra Moise, Ana Mª Jiménez Zarate, M. Carmen Eito Navasal, Maria Gracia Garcia Ramirez, Ana Mª Jiménez Zarate, Mar Armario Fernández.

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Expedient: PI20/01563.

Supplementary Data

Supplement S1

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Authors’ contributions: Laia Badia-Cebada analysed data and wrote the article,

Judit Peñafiel did the statistical analysis

Patrick Saliba, Enric Limón and Miquel Pujol coordinate the VinCat Program and participated with the data analyses

Marta Andrés, Jordi Càmara, Dolors Domenech, Emili Jiménez-Martínez, Anna Marrón, Encarna Moreno, Virginia Pomar, Montserrat Vaqué, Úrsula Masats and Oriol Gasch are members of the Catheter-related infections study group.

Oriol Gasch leaded the study and the analyses and wrote the article.

References

  • 1. Zarb P, Coignard B, Griskeviciene J, Muller A, Vankerckhoven V, Weist K, et al. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) pilot point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(46):20316. 10.2807/ese.17.46.20316-en [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sociedad Española de Medicina Preventiva. Estudio EPINE-EPPS no 30: 2019. Estud EPiNE. 2019;
  • 3. Zingg W, Metsini A, Balmelli C, Neofytos D, Behnke M, Gardiol C, et al. National point prevalence survey on healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals, Switzerland, 2017. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(32). 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.32.1800603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rodríguez-Baño J, López-Prieto MD, Portillo MM, Retamar P, Natera C, Nuño E, et al. Epidemiology and clinical features of community-acquired, healthcare-associated and nosocomial bloodstream infections in tertiary-care and community hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(9):1408-13. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03089.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(9):1159-71. 10.4065/81.9.1159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(3):309-17. 10.1086/421946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Stevens V, Geiger K, Concannon C, Nelson RE, Brown J, Dumyati G. Inpatient costs, mortality and 30-day re-admission in patients with central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(5):O318-24. 10.1111/1469-0691.12407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-32. 10.1056/NEJMoa061115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.VinCat. Barcelona: Catalan Health Service. [Accessed: 19 Apr 2022]. Available from. https://catsalut.gencat.cat/ca/proveidors-professionals/vincat/index.html#googtrans(ca%7Cen)
  • 10.Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Programme at Catalan Hospitals (VINCat). 2015 Manual. 2015 Available from: https://catsalut.gencat.cat/web/.content/minisite/vincat/documents/manuals/Manual-VINCat-2015-english.pdf
  • 11.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals. Protocol version 5.3. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/PPS-HAI-antimicrobial-use-EU-acute-care-hospitals-V5-3.pdf
  • 12. Trinh TT, Chan PA, Edwards O, Hollenbeck B, Huang B, Burdick N, et al. Peripheral venous catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(6):579-83. 10.1086/660099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Almirante B, Limón E, Freixas N, Gudiol F, VINCat Program . Laboratory-based surveillance of hospital-acquired catheter-related bloodstream infections in Catalonia. Results of the VINCat Program (2007-2010). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012;30(Suppl 3):13-9. 10.1016/S0213-005X(12)70091-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG, Munn VP, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(2):182-205. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Palomar M, Álvarez-Lerma F, Riera A, Díaz MT, Torres F, Agra Y, et al. Bacteremia Zero Working Group . Impact of a national multimodal intervention to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection in the ICU: the Spanish experience. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2364-72. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182923622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Blot K, Bergs J, Vogelaers D, Blot S, Vandijck D. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(1):96-105. 10.1093/cid/ciu239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Freixas N, Bella F, Limón E, Pujol M, Almirante B, Gudiol F. Impact of a multimodal intervention to reduce bloodstream infections related to vascular catheters in non-ICU wards: a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(9):838-44. 10.1111/1469-0691.12049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marschall J, Leone C, Jones M, Nihill D, Fraser VJ, Warren DK. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections in general medical patients outside the intensive care unit: a surveillance study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(8):905-9. 10.1086/519206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zingg W, Sax H, Inan C, Cartier V, Diby M, Clergue F, et al. Hospital-wide surveillance of catheter-related bloodstream infection: from the expected to the unexpected. J Hosp Infect. 2009;73(1):41-6. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tedja R, Gordon SM, Fatica C, Fraser TG. The descriptive epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infection among patients in non-intensive care unit settings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(2):164-8. 10.1086/674856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mermel LA. Short-term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(10):1757-62. 10.1093/cid/cix562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Pujol M, Hornero A, Saballs M, Argerich MJ, Verdaguer R, Cisnal M, et al. Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2007;67(1):22-9. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Guembe M, Pérez-Granda MJ, Capdevila JA, Barberán J, Pinilla B, Martín-Rabadán P, et al. NUVE Study Group . Nationwide study on peripheral-venous-catheter-associated-bloodstream infections in internal medicine departments. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97(3):260-6. 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ripa M, Morata L, Rodríguez-Núñez O, Cardozo C, Puerta-Alcalde P, Hernández-Meneses M, et al. Short-term peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: Evidence for increasing prevalence of Gram-negative microorganisms from a 25-year prospective observational study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(11):e00892-18. 10.1128/AAC.00892-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Saliba P, Hornero A, Cuervo G, Grau I, Jimenez E, Berbel D, et al. Interventions to decrease short-term peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: impact on incidence and mortality. J Hosp Infect. 2018;100(3):e178-86. 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rhodes D, Cheng AC, McLellan S, Guerra P, Karanfilovska D, Aitchison S, et al. Reducing Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections associated with peripheral intravenous cannulae: successful implementation of a care bundle at a large Australian health service. J Hosp Infect. 2016;94(1):86-91. 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Garcia-Gasalla M, Arrizabalaga-Asenjo M, Collado-Giner C, Ventayol-Aguiló L, Socias-Mir A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez A, et al. Results of a multi-faceted educational intervention to prevent peripheral venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections. J Hosp Infect. 2019;102(4):449-53. 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Braun E, Hussein K, Geffen Y, Rabino G, Bar-Lavie Y, Paul M. Predominance of Gram-negative bacilli among patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(10):O627-9. 10.1111/1469-0691.12565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Marcos M, Soriano A, Iñurrieta A, Martínez JA, Romero A, Cobos N, et al. Changing epidemiology of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: increasing prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):2119-25. 10.1093/jac/dkr231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bouza E, Eworo A, Fernández Cruz A, Reigadas E, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Muñoz P. Catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. J Hosp Infect. 2013;85(4):316-20. 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lorente L, Jiménez A, Santana M, Iribarren JL, Jiménez JJ, Martín MM, et al. Microorganisms responsible for intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection according to the catheter site. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(10):2424-7. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000284589.63641.B8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee . Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(4) Suppl 1;S1-34. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Stuart RL, Cameron DR, Scott C, Kotsanas D, Grayson ML, Korman TM, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: more than 5 years of prospective data from two tertiary health services. Med J Aust. 2013;198(10):551-3. 10.5694/mja12.11699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement S1

Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES