Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2021 May 31;61(7):2204–2212. doi: 10.1111/trf.16507

When recombinant proteins can replace rare red cells in immunohematology workups

Willy A Flegel 1, Kshitij Srivastava 1
PMCID: PMC9102641  NIHMSID: NIHMS1802202  PMID: 34060094

Many blood group antigens are present in >90% of people1 worldwide or in large populations. They are high-prevalence antigens, often with frequencies >99%.25 They are also known as high-incidence3,68 or high-frequency antigens,911 while the term public antigens12 is not used anymore. Low-prevalence blood group antigens occur in <1% of people.1 Pairs of corresponding high- and low-prevalence antigens are antithetical antigens.13 Individuals whose red cells completely lack the protein or carbohydrate, often bound to lipids, carrying blood group antigens can develop antibodies to high-prevalence antigens when challenged with normal red cells through blood transfusion or pregnancy. Alternatively, individuals who are homozygous or heterozygous for alleles expressing a low-prevalence antigen, for example, caused by an amino acid substitution in the protein, can develop an antibody to the original protein expressing the high-prevalence antigen.14

Many antibodies to high-prevalence antigens are clinically significant.1517 These antibodies are difficult for routine laboratories to investigate due to a dearth of red cells that are negative for high-prevalence antigens.15,18 In this method note, we advocate the application of recombinant proteins in routine immunohematology workups to help identify antibodies against high-prevalence antigens.

1 |. RECOMBINANT BLOOD GROUP PROTEINS

Artificially produced proteins are called recombinant proteins, when they are expressed in vector systems using the recombinant DNA technology in cells.19 The technology, established in the early 1970s,20 was first applied to therapeutic protein production in the late 1970s21 (human insulin22) and early 1980s23 (tissue plasminogen activator24,25) and became widely available in the 1990s.19

Recombinant blood group proteins (rBGPs) expressing functional blood group antigens can react with human antisera in conventional hemagglutination assays. rBGPs have occasionally been used in defining new blood group antigens, generally in conjunction with rare red cells. Molds and Rowe, in 1996, were the first to describe the soluble form of a protein to neutralize antibodies against distinct high-prevalence blood group antigens.26 They applied a soluble form of the Complement Receptor 1 (CR1) protein in a hemagglutination inhibition assay and neutralized antibodies against high-prevalence antigens of the Knops blood group system.26

Red cells negative for high-prevalence antigens are often in short supply. No Immunohematology Reference Laboratory (IRL) may have all of them available. Because these red cells are lacking or scarce, many studies began utilizing rBGPs.2740 Also, rBGPs are easy to store frozen or lyophilized, quite different from the complex shipping and freezing requirements of red cells.41 The expression of rBGP in eukaryotic systems is often preferred over expression vectors in prokaryotic systems, although they are easier and cheaper,42 because appropriate posttranslational modifications are required for the formation of three-dimensional epitope structure.43

2 |. rBGPs AND ANTIBODY CHARACTERIZATION

Since 1996, multiple studies have exploited soluble or cell membrane-bound recombinant proteins to screen human sera for blood-group-specific antibodies (Table 1).27,29,32,4495 There are 190 red cell antigens classified as high-prevalence by the ISBT (see web resources).96 To identify antibody specificities against all high-prevalence antigens, up to 190 distinct red cells lacking high-prevalence antigens or lacking the whole carrier protein would be needed. When available at all, such red cells may not be blood group O and then be incompatible with the non-O patients.

TABLE 1.

Blood group systems and their antigens whose antibodies have been inhibited by soluble recombinant proteins

Comment
Blood group system Symbol ISBT number Antigen Prevalence Reference Commercial availabilitya
MNS MNS 002 M Intermediate 44 No
Vw Low 44 No
Hut Low 44 No

Lutheran LU 005 Lua Intermediate 32,4648 Yes
Lub High 4547,4951 Yes
Lu3 High 46 No
Lu4 High 51 Yes
Lu5 High 51 Yes
Lu6 High 51 Yes
Lu7 High 51 No
Lu8 High 32 Yes
Lu12 High 51 Yes
Lu13 High 51 Yes
Aub Intermediate 51 No
Lu20 High 51 Yes
Lu28 High 52 Yes
Lu29 High 53 Yes

Kell KEL 006 K Intermediate 45,46,5456 Yes
k High 45,46,54,55,57,58 Yes
Kpa Low 56,57 No
Kpb High 45,46,54,57 Yes
Ku High 57,58 No
Jsa Low 56 Yes
Jsb High 45,46,54,57,58 No
K14 High 58,59 Yes

Duffy FY 008 Fya Intermediate 45,46,57,6062 Yes
Fyb Intermediate 45,46,57,61,62 Yes
Fy6 High 60 Yes

Kidd JK 009 Jkb Intermediate 63 No

Diego DI 010 Wrb High 64 No

Cartwright YT 011 Yta High 32 Yes
YTEG High 65 Yes
YTLI High 66 Yes
YTOT High 66 Yes

Xg XG 012 Xga Intermediate 67 Yes
CD99 High 67,68 No

Scianna SC 013 Sc1 High 29 Yes
Sc3 High 69 Yes
STAR High 29 Yes
SCAR High 70 Yes

Dombrock DO 014 Doa Intermediate 32,71 Yes
Dob Intermediate 32,72 Yes
Gya High 71,72 No
Hy High 71 Yes
Joa High 71 Yes

Colton CO 015 Not specified Not specified 73 NA

Landsteiner-Wiener LW 016 LWa High 74 Yes
LWb Low 74 No

Chido/Rodgers CH/RG 017 Not specified High 32 Yesb

Kx XK 019 Kx High 59 NA

Gerbich GE 020 Ge2 High 27 No
Ge3 High 27,75 No
Ge4 High 27 No
Lsa Low 27 No

Cromer CROM 021 Cra High 32,76,77 Yes
Tca High 76,77 Yes
Dra High 76 Yes
IFC High 76 Yes
WESb High 32 Yes
UMC High 76 Yes
CORS High 78 Yes

Knops KN 022 Kna High 26,57,79,80 Yes
McCa High 5,57,80 Yes
Sla High 26,80 Yes
Yka High 5,57,80 Yes
DACY High 81 Yes
YCAD Intermediate 81 Yes
Not specified Not specified 32,57,82 NA

Indian IN 023 Inb High 83 Yes
INSL High 84 Yes

Ok OK 024 Not specified Not specified 85,86 NA

John Milton Hagen JMH 026 JMH High 32,87,88,90,91 Yes
JMHK High 88 Yes
JMHL High 88 Yes
JMHG High 88 Yes
JMHM High 88 Yes
JMHQ High 89 Yes
JMHN High 92 Yes
JMHA High 93 Yes

CD59 CD59 035 CD59.1 High 94 Yes

Abbreviations: ISBT, International Society of Blood Transfusion; NA, not applicable.

a

List of commercially available rBGPs with corresponding antigens (see Web resources).

b

Chido/Rodgers antigens targeted: Ch1 and Rg1.

A small number of readily available rBGPs may suffice to inhibit antibodies against high-prevalence blood group antigens, once the rBGPs are made available and their functionality has been shown and comprehensively investigated. Besides the established rBGPs in the 21 blood group systems (Table 1), this may in the future also apply to the remaining 13 protein-based blood group systems (Table 2). We propose that laboratories keep a panel of rare red cells along with a panel of rBGPs. However, rBGPs need to be developed for most of the low-prevalence antigens as currently commercially available rBGPs are predominantly directed against high-prevalence antigens (see web resources).

TABLE 2.

Blood group systems whose antibodies could potentially be inhibited by soluble recombinant proteinsa

Blood group system Symbol ISBT number
Rh RH 004
Raph RAPH 025
Gill GIL 029
Rh-associated glycoproteinb RHAG 030
JR JR 032
LAN LAN 033
Vel VEL 034
Augustine AUG 036
KANNO KANNO 037
CTL2 CTL2 039
PEL PEL 040
MAM MAM 041
ABCC1 ABCC1 043

Abbreviations: ISBT, International Society of Blood Transfusion.

a

Antibodies of these blood group systems may be feasible targets for inhibition by different reagents, such as recombinant blood group proteins (rBGPs), peptides, mimotopes, or aptamers. However, such inhibition has not been shown for any of them. Some of the reagents may be commercially available.

b

Kg antibody inhibited by the RhAG protein expressed on the surface of Chinese Hamster Ovary cells.95

3 |. RECOMBINANT PROTEINS AND NEW BLOOD GROUP SYSTEMS

More red cell membrane proteins than blood group systems are known9799 to be of clinical relevance.100 Some will become defined as new blood group systems in the future, such as the recently discovered ABCC1 blood group system (Table 2).100,101 Soluble forms of red cell membrane proteins obtained through recombinant expression systems can act as antigens to inhibit novel antibodies contributing to the identification of new blood group systems. Once defined as a new system, the proteins can be listed as rBGPs.

4 |. rBGPs AND NOVEL ANTIGENS IN KNOWN BLOOD GROUP SYSTEMS

To confirm a new high-prevalence antigen actually belonged to the Scianna blood group system, we recently applied a soluble recombinant ERMAP protein.70 The ERMAP protein inhibited the antibody in our study, which allowed us to define the antibody as being directed against a hitherto unknown high-prevalence Scianna antigen, dubbed SCAR (SC8).70 The standard approach was using red cells with rare null phenotypes (null cells)102104 to define new blood group systems and new high-prevalence antigens. Unless alternatives are available, null cells are needed because ISBT guidelines1 for establishment of new blood group systems or new antigens in an established system require demonstration of antigen expression specifically in erythroid cells.

The ISBT Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology has begun accepting evidence from rBGPs alone,65,66,70,81,84 without testing against red cells lacking the protein or antigen, to satisfy the requirements1 for defining novel blood group antigens. The first example was the YTEG antigen of the YT blood group system in 2017,65 followed by the YT antigens YTLI and YTOT66 and the Indian antigen INSL84 in 2018. SCAR70 in the Scianna blood group system105 and DACY and YCAD81 in the Knops blood group system106 were accepted in 2020 based on rBGP evidence without testing against red cells lacking the relevant blood group protein.

In many blood group systems, carriers of the null phenotype are rare.102 In a few blood group systems, notably YT,107 the null phenotype may be incompatible with life or at least no living carrier of null cells has ever been found. Hence for YT, the definition of new blood group antigens108,109 was by necessity without red cells lacking the AChE protein. For Scianna and Indian, null cells albeit very rare are known,110,111 and the description of the new antigens SCAR and INSL was by choice without red cells lacking the ERMAP or CD44 proteins. The serologic KN “null” phenotype, known as Helgeson phenotype, is not a true null phenotype as it expresses low amounts of KN antigens.112

Antibodies against high-prevalence antigens occur in individuals who are homozygous for exquisitely rare alleles. Hence, a convincing biostatistical argument can be made to obviate the need for family or experimental studies, if null cells or rBGPs are used. Antibodies against low-prevalence antigens typically require family studies to show inheritance. If unavailable, technically advanced expression studies in human erythroid systems used to be the only option left. Today, rBGPs may be the technically easier way to express a low-prevalence antigen and prove an antibody’s specificity. For all new antigens, several lines of evidence are sought and rBGPs are just another, yet readily available, line of evidence. The approach of using rBGPs may have a wider application and would enable more laboratories to participate in the search and definition of new blood group antigens.

5 |. rBGPs AND PROTEIN BLOOD GROUP SYSTEMS

Antibodies against any antigen of the 34 protein-based blood group systems can be inhibited. Depending on the structure of the protein in the red cell membrane, suitable rBGPs for many blood group systems have been developed (Table 1). In case of proteins spanning the red cell membrane, soluble recombinant polypeptides representative for the extracellular regions are required. Blood group systems with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins113 can be artificially expressed.94 Another source for this type of protein is its cleavage from the GPI-anchor on red cells by using a specific bacterial phospholipase, phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C (PI-PLC).114,115

6 |. rBGPs AND NON-PROTEIN BLOOD GROUP SYSTEMS

rBGPs, as proteins, can obviously not inhibit antibodies against the sugar antigens in the eight carbohydrate-based blood group systems116,117 or the one recently described blood group system constituted by the GPI anchor itself.118,119 It has been known long before 1996 that most of these antibodies can, however, be inhibited by biologicals. They include soluble substances present in human bio-fluids (saliva, urine, milk, and plasma), hydatid cyst fluid, pigeon egg albumin, or guinea pig urine.40

7 |. rBGP ALTERNATIVES

Besides somewhat ill-defined biologicals,40 there are well-defined rBGP alternatives, which can serve as tools in immunohematology today and function similar to rBGPs. Short peptides called mimotopes120,121 or peptide aptamers122,123 are 5–20 amino acid residues long fragments that can be used as soluble agents to neutralize blood group antibodies in hemagglutination inhibition assays. The peptides can structurally mimic both carbohydrate and protein epitopes as shown for Lewis,124 and ABO125 as well as Rh126 and Duffy blood group systems.127,128 These rBGP alternatives are chemically synthesized, inexpensive peptides requiring neither recombinant DNA technology nor prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells to produce.

8 |. SUMMARY

rBGPs are feasible substitutes for red cells with rare null phenotypes (null cells) and can contribute to identify antibodies against high-prevalence antigens. However, several limitations restrict the widespread use of rBGPs in the identification of new blood group systems and new antigens in known systems. These limitations include the efficient production of rBGPs in soluble form with precise folding, the lack of rBGPs for many blood group systems, and of course cost. We still expect that this methodology can often replace the use of null cells or protein expression studies in human erythroid cells, which have hitherto been considered the gold standard for proof of novel blood group antigens and systems.1 This approach has recently been accepted by the ISBT Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology. Panels of commercially available rBGPs could be developed, which in different combinations would provide handy sets of reagents for use in routine blood group serology, antibody screening, and antibody identification.39

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Jill R Storry for providing an updated list of human blood group antigens and associated references. This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program (project ID ZIC CL002128 and RASCL727301) of the NIH Clinical Center at the National Institutes of Health.

Funding information

NIH Clinical Center at the National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Numbers: RASCL727301, ZIC CL002128

Abbreviations:

CR1

Complement Receptor 1

IRL

Immunohematology Reference Laboratory

ISBT

International Society of Blood Transfusion

rBGPs

Recombinant blood group proteins

Footnotes

WEB RESOURCES

ISBT table of blood group antigens within systems (https://www.isbtweb.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Table_of_blood_group_antigens_within_systems_v9.0_03-FEB-2021.pdf). ISBT Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, (https://www.isbtweb.org/working-parties/red-cell-immunogenetics-and-blood-group-terminology).

Imusyn, Hannover, Germany (https://www.inno-train.de/en/products/recombinant-blood-group-antigens-imusyn). Novoprotein Scientific, Summit, New Jersey, USA (http://www.novoprotein.com).

OriGene Technologies, Rockville, Maryland, USA (https://www.origene.com).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest. The views expressed do not necessarily represent the view of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. Federal Government.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Daniels GL, Fletcher A, Garratty G, Henry S, Jørgensen J, Judd WJ, et al. Blood group terminology 2004: from the International Society of Blood Transfusion committee on terminology for red cell surface antigens. Vox Sang. 2004;87:304–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Storry JR, Castilho L, Chen Q, Daniels G, Denomme G, Flegel WA, et al. International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on red cell immunogenetics and terminology: report of the Seoul and London meetings. ISBT Sci Ser. 2016;11:118–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Storry JR, Castilho L, Daniels G, Flegel WA, Garratty G, Haas M, et al. International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on red cell immunogenetics and blood group terminology: Cancun report (2012). Vox Sang. 2014;107:90–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Flegel WA, Chen Q, Reid ME, Martin J, Orsini LA, Poole J, et al. SCER and SCAN: two novel high-prevalence antigens in the Scianna blood group system. Transfusion. 2005;45:1940–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reid ME, Oyen R, Redman CM, Gillespie G, Jones J, Eckrich R. K12 is located on the Kell blood group protein in proximity to K/k and Jsa/Jsb. Vox Sang. 1995;68:40–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Storry JR, Castilho L, Daniels G, Flegel WA, Garratty G, Francis CL, et al. International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on red cell immunogenetics and blood group terminology: Berlin report. Vox Sang. 2011;101:77–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lewis M, Allen FH Jr, Anstee DJ, Bird GWG, Brodheim E, Contreras M, et al. ISBT Working Party on terminology for red cell surface antigens: Munich report. Vox Sang. 1985;49:171–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schmidt RP, Griffitts JJ, Northman FF. A new antibody, anti-Sm, reacting with a high incidence antigen. Transfusion. 1962;2:338–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Daniels GL, Judd WJ, Moore BP, Neitzer G, Ouellet P, Plantos M, et al. A ‘new’ high frequency antigen Era. Transfusion. 1982;22:189–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gralnick MA, Goldfinger D, Hatfield PA, Reid ME, Marsh WL. Anti-Lu 11: another antibody defining a high-frequency antigen related to the Lutheran blood group system. Vox Sang. 1974;27:52–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wiener AS, Gordon EB, Unger LJ. Sensitization to the very high frequency blood factor Vel, with observations on the occurrence of the very rare Vel-negative type among siblings. Bull Brooklyn. 1961;3:46–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anstee DJ. Blood group-active surface molecules of the human red blood cell. Vox Sang. 1990;58:1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Walker R, Argall C, Steane E, Sasaki T, Greenwalt T. Anti-Js-b, the expected antithetical antibody of the Suttee blood group system. Nature. 1963;197:295–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gassner C, Degenhardt F, Meyer S, Vollmert C, Trost N, Neuenschwander K, et al. Low-frequency blood group antigens in Switzerland. Transfus Med Hemother. 2018;45:239–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seltsam A, Wagner FF, Salama A, Flegel WA. Antibodies to high-frequency antigens may decrease the quality of transfusion support: an observational study. Transfusion. 2003;43:1563–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lomas-Francis C. Clinical significance of antibodies to antigens in the International Society of Blood Transfusion collections, 700 series of low-incidence antigens, and 901 series of high-incidence antigens. Immunohematology. 2018;34:39–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brunker PAR, Ravindran K, Shirey RS. Modeling alloantibody formation to high-incidence red blood cell antigens in immune responders using genotypic data. Immunohematology. 2017;33:9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Woodfield G, Poole J, Nance ST, Daniels G. A review of the ISBT rare blood donor program. Immunohematology. 2004;20:244–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Structural Genomics Consortium, China Structural Genomics Consortium, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Gräslund S, Nordlund P, Weigelt J, et al. Protein production and purification. Nat Methods. 2008;5:135–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jackson DA, Symons RH, Berg P. Biochemical method for inserting new genetic information into DNA of simian virus 40: circular SV40 DNA molecules containing lambda phage genes and the galactose operon of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972;69:2904–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Miller WL, Baxter JD. Recombinant DNA—a new source of insulin. Diabetologia. 1980;18:431–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chance RE, Frank BH. Research, development, production, and safety of biosynthetic human insulin. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(Suppl 3):133–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hacker DL, Wurm FM. Recombinant technology. In: Moo-Young M, editor. Comprehensive biotechnology. 2nd ed. Burlington: Academic Press; 2011. p. 401–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pennica D, Holmes WE, Kohr WJ, Harkins RN, Vehar GA, Ward CA, et al. Cloning and expression of human tissue-type plasminogen activator cDNA in E. coli. Nature. 1983;301:214–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Collen D, Lijnen HR. The tissue-type plasminogen activator story. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:1151–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moulds JM, Rowe KE. Neutralization of Knops system antibodies using soluble complement receptor 1. Transfusion. 1996;36:517–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schawalder A, Reid ME, Yazdanbakhsh K. Recombinant glycophorins C and D as tools for studying Gerbich blood group antigens. Transfusion. 2004;44:567–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yazdanbakhsh K. Applications of blood group antigen expression systems for antibody detection and identification. Transfusion. 2007;47:85s–8s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Seltsam A, Grueger D, Blasczyk R, Flegel WA. Easy identification of antibodies to high-prevalence Scianna antigens and detection of admixed alloantibodies using soluble recombinant Scianna protein. Transfusion. 2009;49:2090–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Seltsam A, Blasczyk R. Recombinant blood group proteins for use in antibody screening and identification tests. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16:473–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Seltsam A. Application of recombinant antigens to blood group diagnostics. ISBT Sci Ser. 2011;6:13–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Seltsam A, Wagner F, Lambert M, Bullock T, Thornton N, Scharberg EA, et al. Recombinant blood group proteins facilitate the detection of alloantibodies to high-prevalence antigens and reveal underlying antibodies: results of an international study. Transfusion. 2014;54:1823–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Heuft HG, Dahm A, Lanz S, et al. Soluble recombinant blood group proteins for red blood cell antibody identification. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41(suppl 1):18. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Scharberg EA, Kömürcü N, Gillhuber N, et al. Evaluation of recombinant blood group proteins for detection of antibodies to dombrock, JMH, In(b) and Cr(a) red cell antigens. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41(suppl 1):58. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hustinx H, Glutz D, Lejon CS. Experiences with recombinant blood group proteins in the Swiss immunohematology reference laboratory. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41(Suppl 1):59. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wagner F, Seltsam A, Trestyanszki I. Recombinant soluble CD44 allows exclusion of additional red blood cell antibodies in a patient under therapy with anti-CD44. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41(Suppl 1):62. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wagner F, Döscher A, McNeill A, et al. Recombinant blood group protein enables laboratories with limited access to rare cells to identify antibodies: the case of anti-Lu8. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41(Suppl 1):63. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wagner FF, Mardt I, Doescher A. Combined use of recombinant proteins and sequencing allowed identification of a rare KN allele in a blood donor with a positive antibody screen. Transfusion. 2015;55(Suppl 3):35A. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Seltsam A, Blasczyk R. Recombinant blood group proteins in clinical practice—from puzzling to binary antibody testing. ISBT Sci Ser. 2016;11:243–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Byrne KM, Mercado CMC, Nnabue TN, Paige TD, Flegel WA. Inhibition of blood group antibodies by soluble substances. Immunohematology. 2019;35:19–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schmid P, Huvard MJ, Lee-Stroka AH, Lee JY, Byrne KM, Flegel WA. Red blood cell preservation by droplet freezing with polyvinylpyrrolidone or sucrose-dextrose and by bulk freezing with glycerol. Transfusion. 2011;51:2703–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Khow O, Suntrarachun S. Strategies for production of active eukaryotic proteins in bacterial expression system. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2:159–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yin J, Li G, Ren X, Herrler G. Select what you need: a comparative evaluation of the advantages and limitations of frequently used expression systems for foreign genes. J Biotechnol. 2007;127:335–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ugorski M, Blackall DP, Påhlsson P, Shakin-Eshleman SH, Moore J, Spitalnik SL. Recombinant Miltenberger I and II human blood group antigens: the role of glycosylation in cell surface expression and antigenicity of glycophorin A. Blood. 1993;82:1913–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Doyle J, Ridgwell K, Lambert M, et al. Red cell antibody inhibition using unpurified cell culture supernatant containing soluble recombinant blood group proteins. Vox Sang. 2015;109(Suppl 1):249. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ridgwell K, Dixey J, Scott ML. Production of soluble recombinant proteins with Kell, Duffy and Lutheran blood group antigen activity, and their use in screening human sera for Kell, Duffy and Lutheran antibodies. Transfus Med. 2007;17:384–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.El Nemer W, Rahuel C, Colin Y, et al. Organization of the human LU gene and molecular basis of the Lu(a)/Lu(b) blood group polymorphism. Blood. 1997;89:4608–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ridgwell K, Dixey J, Parsons SF, Green CA, Scott ML. Screening human sera for anti-Lu antibodies using soluble recombinant Lu antigens. Transfus Med 2001;11(suppl 1):32. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Seltsam A, Agaylan A, Grueger D, Meyer O, Blasczyk R, Salama A. Rapid detection of anti-Lu(b) with recombinant Lu(b) protein and the particle gel immunoassay. Transfusion. 2008;48:731–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Seltsam A, Grüger D, Blasczyk R. Prokaryotic versus eukaryotic recombinant Lutheran blood group protein for antibody identification. Transfusion. 2007;47:1630–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Daniels GL, Green CA, Smythe JS, Anstee DJ. Use of domain-deletion mutants to locate Lutheran blood group antigens to each of the five immunoglobulin superfamily domains of the Lutheran glycoprotein: elucidation of the molecular basis of the Lu(a)/Lu(b) and the Au(a)/Au(b) polymorphisms. Blood. 1997;89:4219–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Karamatic Crew V, Mayer B, Baglow L, et al. A novel high frequency antigen in the Lutheran blood group system (LUNU). Vox Sang. 2019;114(Suppl 1):52. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yosephi L, Karamatic Crew V, Shinar E, et al. A Lutheran related antibody detected in a patient with a homozygous missense BCAM mutation indication a novel antigen of the system. Vox Sang. 2019;114(Suppl 1):52. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ridgwell K, Dixey J, Scott ML. The production of soluble recombinant KeIl antigens and their use in screening human sera for anti-Kell blood group antibodies. Transfus Med 2003;13(suppl 1):9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Seltsam A, Chesla S, Sinor L. Feasibility of antibody testing utilizing recombinant antigens in a solid phase assay. Transfusion. 2008;48(Suppl):21A. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yazdanbakhsh K, Lee S, Yu Q, Reid ME. Identification of a defect in the intracellular trafficking of a Kell blood group variant. Blood. 1999;94:310–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yazdanbakhsh K, Oyen R, Yu Q, Lee S, Antoniou M, Chaudhuri A, et al. High-level, stable expression of blood group antigens in a heterologous system. Am J Hematol. 2000;63:114–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Russo DC, Lee S, Reid M, Redman CM. Topology of Kell blood group protein and the expression of multiple antigens by transfected cells. Blood. 1994;84:3518–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Russo D, Redman C, Lee S. Association of XK and Kell blood group proteins. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13950–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Waśniowska K, Czerwński M, Jachymek W, Lisowska E. Expression and binding properties of a soluble chimeric protein containing the N-terminal domain of the Duffy antigen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;273:705–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sheffield WP, Bhakta V, Branch DR, Denomme GA. Detection of antibodies reacting with the antithetical Duffy blood group antigens Fy(a) and Fy(b) using recombinant fusion proteins containing the Duffy extracellular domain. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006;35:207–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sheffield W, Bhakta V, Denomme G. Use of recombinant forms of Duffy blood group antigen to detect anti-Fy(a) and anti-Fy(b) antibodies. Transfusion. 2003;43(Suppl):34A.12519428 [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sidoux-Walter F, Lucien N, Nissinen R, Sistonen P, Henry S, Moulds J, et al. Molecular heterogeneity of the Jk(null) phenotype: expression analysis of the Jk(S291P) mutation found in Finns. Blood. 2000;96:1566–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Beckmann R, Smythe JS, Anstee DJ, Tanner MJA. Coexpression of band 3 mutants and Rh polypeptides: differential effects of band 3 on the expression of the Rh complex containing D polypeptide and the Rh complex containing CcEe polypeptide. Blood. 2001;97:2496–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Laundy R, Karamatic Crew V, Davies H, et al. A novel high frequency antigen in the Yt blood group system. Transfus Med. 2017;27(Suppl 2):42–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Karamatic Crew V, Laundy R, Walser P, et al. Serological and molecular characterisation of two novel high frequency antigens in the Yt blood group system. Vox Sang. 2018;113(Suppl 1):63. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fouchet C, Gane P, Huet M, Fellous M, Rouger P, Banting G, et al. A study of the coregulation and tissue specificity of XG and MIC2 gene expression in eukaryotic cells. Blood. 2000;95:1819–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gil MC, Lee MH, Seo JI, Choi YL, Kim MK, Jung KC, et al. Characterization and epitope mapping of two monoclonal antibodies against human CD99. Exp Mol Med. 2002;34:411–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Henny C, Karamatic Crew V, McNeill A, et al. A patient of Caucasian origin with anti-Sc3 and the SC-null phenotype due to a novel ERMAP mutation. Vox Sang. 2016;111(suppl 1):223. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Srivastava K, Albasri J, Alsuhaibani OM, et al. SCAR: the high-prevalence antigen 013.008 in the Scianna blood group system. Transfusion. 2020;61:246–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gubin AN, Njoroge JM, Wojda U, Pack SD, Rios M, Reid ME, et al. Identification of the Dombrock blood group glycoprotein as a polymorphic member of the ADP-ribosyltransferase gene family. Blood. 2000;96:2621–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Westhoff C, Vege S, Yazdanbakhsh K, Wylie D, Razib M, Hue-Roye K, et al. A DOB allele encoding an amino acid substitution (Phe62Ser) resulting in a Dombrock null phenotype. Transfusion. 2007;47:1356–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Buck TM, Skach WR. Differential stability of biogenesis intermediates reveals a common pathway for aquaporin-1 topological maturation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:261–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hermand P, Gane P, Mattei MG, Sistonen P, Cartron JP, Bailly P. Molecular basis and expression of the LWa/LWb blood group polymorphism. Blood. 1995;86:1590–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Jaskiewicz E, Czerwinski M, Colin Y, Lisowska E. Recombinant forms of Gerbich blood group antigens: expression and purification. Transfus Clin Biol. 2002;9:121–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Daniels GL, Green CA, Powell RM, Ward T. Hemagglutination inhibition of Cromer blood group antibodies with soluble recombinant decay-accelerating factor. Transfusion. 1998;38:332–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Telen MJ, Rao N, Udani M, Thompson ES, Kaufman RM, Lublin DM. Molecular mapping of the Cromer blood group Cra and Tca epitopes of decay accelerating factor: toward the use of recombinant antigens in immunohematology. Blood. 1994;84:3205–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Vrignaud C, Chiaroni J, Durieux-Roussel E, et al. CORS (CROM20): a new high-prevalence antigen in the Cromer blood group system. Transfusion. 2020;60:E40–e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Weinstock C, Kaiser S, Braun G, et al. Recombinant group proteins proved to be a helpful tool for antibody screening in presence of an anti-Kna. Vox Sang. 2015;109(Suppl 1):265. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tamasauskas D, Powell V, Schawalder A, Yazdanbakhsh K. Localization of Knops system antigens in the long homologous repeats of complement receptor 1. Transfusion. 2001;41:1397–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Grueger D, Zeretzke A, Habicht CP, Skaik Y, Wagner FF, Scharberg EA, et al. Two novel antithetical KN blood group antigens may contribute to more than a quarter of all KN antisera in Europe. Transfusion. 2020;60:2408–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Krych-Goldberg M, Hauhart RE, Subramanian VB, Yurcisin BM II, Crimmins DL, Hourcade DE, et al. Decay accelerating activity of complement receptor type 1 (CD35). Two active sites are required for dissociating C5 convertases. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:31160–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Vogel YA, Hustinx H, Stettler J, et al. Case report anti Indian B antibody in a pregnant woman of Indian origin. Vox Sang. 2019;114(Suppl 1):204. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Henny C, Thornton N, Lejon Crottet S, et al. An antibody against a novel high incidence antigen in the Indian blood group system. Vox Sang. 2018;113(Suppl 1):231. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yurchenko V, Pushkarsky T, Li JH, Dai WW, Sherry B, Bukrinsky M. Regulation of CD147 cell surface expression: involvement of the proline residue in the CD147 transmembrane domain. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:17013–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tayapiwatana C, Arooncharus P, Kasinrerk W. Displaying and epitope mapping of CD147 on VCSM13 phages: influence of Escherichia coli strains. J Immunol Methods. 2003;281:177–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tilley LA, McNeill A, Moser MI, et al. A novel variant SEMA7A allele in a compound heterozygote, resulting in variant JMH expression and alloanti-JMH production. Vox Sang. 2015;109(Suppl 1):283. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Seltsam A, Strigens S, Levene C, Yahalom V, Moulds M, Moulds JJ, et al. The molecular diversity of Sema7A, the semaphorin that carries the JMH blood group antigens. Transfusion. 2007;47:133–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Richard M, St-Laurent J, Perreault J, Long A, St-Louis M. A new SEMA7A variant found in native Americans with alloantibody. Vox Sang. 2011;100:322–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Seltsam A, Agaylan A, Grueger D, Meyer O, Blasczyk R, Salama A. Rapid detection of JMH antibodies with recombinant Sema7A (CD108) protein and the particle gel immunoassay. Transfusion. 2008;48:1151–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mo C, Ligthart P, Wei Y, et al. Identification of a Chinese patient with anti-JMH alloantibodies. Vox Sang. 2017;112(Suppl 2):122.28010050 [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Vrignaud C, Ramelet S, Herb A, et al. Characterization of a novel high-prevalence antigen in the JMH blood group system. Vox Sang. 2019;114(Suppl 1):52–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Henny C, Thornton N, Laundy R, et al. An antibody against a novel high prevalence antigen in the JMH blood group system. Vox Sang. 2020;115(Suppl 1):231. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Anliker M, von Zabern I, Höchsmann B, Kyrieleis H, Dohna-Schwake C, Flegel WA, et al. A new blood group antigen is defined by anti-CD59, detected in a CD59-deficient patient. Transfusion. 2014;54:1817–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tanaka M, Abe T, Horikawa T, et al. Kg antigen, RHAG with a Lys164Gln mutation, gives rise to hemolytic disease of the newborn. Vox Sang. 2020;115(Suppl 1):41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Storry JR, Clausen FB, Castilho L, Chen Q, Daniels G, Denomme G, et al. International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on red cell Immunogenetics and blood group terminology: report of the Dubai, Copenhagen and Toronto meetings. Vox Sang. 2019;114:95–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.D’Alessandro A, Righetti PG, Zolla L. The red blood cell proteome and interactome: an update. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:144–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Goodman SR, Daescu O, Kakhniashvili DG, Zivanic M. The proteomics and interactomics of human erythrocytes. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2013;238:509–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pesciotta EN, Sriswasdi S, Tang HY, et al. A label-free proteome analysis strategy for identifying quantitative changes in erythrocyte membranes induced by red cell disorders. J Proteomics. 2012;76:194–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Flegel WA, Srivastava K, Sissung TM, Goldspiel BR, Figg WD. Pharmacogenomics with red cells: a model to study protein variants of drug transporter genes. Vox Sang. 2021;116:141–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sugier HR, Vrignaud C, Duval R, et al. Null allele of ABCC1 encoding the multidrug resistance protein 1 defines a novel human blood group system. Vox Sang. 2020;115(suppl 1):40. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Flegel WA. Rare gems: null phenotypes of blood groups. Blood Transfus. 2010;8:2–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Issitt PD. Null red blood cell phenotypes: associated biological changes. Transfus Med Rev. 1993;7:139–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Levine P, Celano M, Falkowski F, Chambers J, Hunter OB Jr, English C. A second example of −/− blood or RH null. Nature. 1964;204:892–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wagner FF, Poole J, Flegel WA. Scianna antigens including Rd are expressed by ERMAP. Blood. 2003;101:752–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Moulds JM, Zimmerman PA, Doumbo OK, Kassambara L, Sagara I, Diallo DA, et al. Molecular identification of knops blood group polymorphisms found in long homologous region D of complement receptor 1. Blood. 2001;97:2879–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Eaton BR, Morton JA, Pickles MM, White KE. A new antibody, anti-Yta, characterizing a blood-group antigen of high incidence. Br J Haematol. 1956;2:333–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Giles CM, Metaxas MN. Identification of the predicted blood group antibody anti-Ytb. Nature. 1964;202:1122–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.McCreary J, Vogler AL, Sabo B, et al. Another minus-minus phenotype: Bu(a-)Sm-, two examples in one family. Transfusion. 1973;13:350. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Parsons SF, Jones J, Anstee DJ, Judson PA, Gardner B, Wiener E, et al. A novel form of congenital dyserythropoietic anemia associated with deficiency of erythroid CD44 and a unique blood group phenotype [In(a-b-), Co(a-b-)]. Blood. 1994;83:860–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Moulds JM, Moulds JJ, Brown M, Atkinson JP. Antiglobulin testing for CR1-related (Knops/McCoy/Swain-Langley/York) blood group antigens: negative and weak reactions are caused by variable expression of CR1. Vox Sang. 1992;62:230–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Telen MJ. Glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-linked blood group antigens and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Transfus Clin Biol. 1995;2:277–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sundler R, Alberts AW, Vagelos PR. Enzymatic properties of phosphatidylinositol inositolphosphohydrolase from Bacillus cereus. Substrate dilution in detergent-phospholipid micelles and bilayer vesicles. J Biol Chem. 1978;253:4175–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Taguchi R, Asahi Y, Ikezawa H. Purification and properties of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C of Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;619:48–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.ISBT. Table of blood group systems. https://www.isbtweb.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Table_of_blood_group_systems_v._9.0_03-FEB-2021.pdf (accessed on May 24, 2021).
  • 117.Dotz V, Wuhrer M. Histo-blood group glycans in the context of personalized medicine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1860;2016:1596–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Duval R, Nicolas G, Willemetz A, et al. Inherited glycosylphosphatidylinositol defects cause the rare Emmnegative blood phenotype and developmental disorders. Unpublished 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lane WJ, Aeschlimann J, Vege S, et al. PIGG defines the Emm blood group system. Unpublished 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Geysen HM, Rodda SJ, Mason TJ. A priori delineation of a peptide which mimics a discontinuous antigenic determinant. Mol Immunol. 1986;23:709–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Kieber-Emmons T. Peptide mimotopes of carbohydrate antigens. Immunol Res. 1998;17:95–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Nord K, Nilsson J, Nilsson B, Nygren PÅ, Nygren PÅ. A combinatorial library of an alpha-helical bacterial receptor domain. Protein Eng. 1995;8:601–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Reverdatto S, Burz DS, Shekhtman A. Peptide aptamers: development and applications. Curr Top Med Chem. 2015;15:1082–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Luo P, Agadjanyan M, Qiu J, Westerink MJ, Steplewski Z, Kieber-Emmons T. Antigenic and immunological mimicry of peptide mimotopes of Lewis carbohydrate antigens. Mol Immunol. 1998;35:865–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Tang ZM, Jiang WC, Chang PP, Fang M, Rong Y, Hu LH. Mimotope selection of blood group a antigen from a phage display 15-mer peptide library. Transpl Immunol. 2013;29:39–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wang J, Song J, Zhou S, Fu Y, Bailey JA, Shen C. Screening and identification of RhD antigen mimic epitopes from a phage display random peptide library for the serodiagnosis of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Blood Transfus. 2019;17:53–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Tait EJA, Fraser R, Moss M, Urbaniak SJ. Synthetic peptide Mimotopes of blood group antigens for red cell antibody screening. Blood. 2008;112:291. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ding SH, Meng QL, Wei SS, et al. Study and application of viable cell-independent blood group antigens. Chin J Immunol. 2015;31:274–6. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES