Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 May 13;12:7923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12049-z

Pentosan polysulfate induces low-level persistent prion infection keeping measurable seeding activity without PrP-res detection in Fukuoka-1 infected cell cultures

Hanae Takatsuki 1, Morikazu Imamura 1, Tsuyoshi Mori 1, Ryuichiro Atarashi 1,
PMCID: PMC9106670  PMID: 35562591

Abstract

Each prion strain has its own characteristics and the efficacy of anti-prion drugs varies. Screening of prion disease therapeutics is typically evaluated by measuring amounts of protease-resistant prion protein (PrP-res). However, it remains unclear whether such measurements correlate with seeding activity, which is evaluated by real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC). In this study, the effects of anti-prion compounds pentosan polysulfate (PPS), Congo red, and alprenolol were measured in N2a58 cells infected with Fukuoka-1 (FK1) or 22L strain. The compounds abolished PrP-res and seeding activity, except for N2a58/FK1 treated with PPS. Interestingly, the seeding activity of N2a58/FK1, which was reduced in the presence of PPS, was not lost and remained at low levels. However, upon removal of PPS, both were gradually restored to their original levels. These results indicate that low-level persistent prion infection keeping measurable seeding activity is induced by PPS in a strain-dependent manner. Furthermore, for protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA), the anti-prion effect of PPS decreased in FK1 compared to 22L, suggesting that the differences occur at the level of the direct conversion. Our findings demonstrate that the advantages of RT-QuIC and PMCA can be exploited for more accurate assessment of therapeutic drug screening, reflecting strain differences.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Drug discovery, Diseases of the nervous system

Introduction

Prion disease is a fatal neurodegenerative disease caused by the accumulation of abnormal prion protein (PrPSc), a structurally altered form of normal prion protein (PrPC), in the central nervous system. Human prion diseases include Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), Gerstmann–Strässler–Schenker syndrome (GSS), and fatal familial insomnia, while animal prion diseases include bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, scrapie in sheep, and chronic wasting disease in deer. Some regions of PrPSc are protease-resistant and remain after proteinase K (PK) treatment, which can be detected by Western blotting (WB) as protease-resistant PrPSc (PrP-res)1.

The main therapeutic targets of prion diseases are inhibition of PrP-res production, promotion of its degradation, and reduction of its neurotoxicity for early-stage cases, as well as regeneration of neural tissue for advanced cases. To screen for therapeutic agents for prion diseases targeting inhibition of PrP-res production and promotion of its degradation, candidate compounds are often added to cultured cells infected with scrapie strains, and the effect on PrP-res levels is examined by WB. Various anti-prion compounds have been found to reduce PrP-res levels in cultured cells and infected animals2,3. For example, pentosan polysulfate (PPS)4, Congo red5, and alprenolol6 can reportedly reduce PrP-res levels in prion-infected cultured cells. Among such drugs, PPS reduced accumulation of PrPSc in the brain and/or prolonged survival in prion-infected mice79. In addition, PPS has been used in clinical practice for variant CJD and other prion diseases, although the number of cases was limited10,11. To date, no effective prophylactic or therapeutic agent for prion diseases has been identified in clinical trials.

Detection of PrP-res by WB may be insufficient for use of PrP-res as an index of anti-prion effects (in terms of detection sensitivity) because prions can remain even after PrP-res disappears. Therefore, we developed a highly sensitive in vitro prion-detection method, the real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assay12. RT-QuIC uses Escherichia coli-derived recombinant PrP as a substrate to promote the conversion reaction by agitation in samples suspected of containing prions (seed), and the process is measured as the fluorescence intensity of thioflavin T to determine the presence of prions13. Numerous reports show the usefulness of RT-QuIC for diagnosis of prion diseases in humans and animals using cerebrospinal fluid and other specimens14. In combination with a serial dilution method, RT-QuIC can also measure the seeding activity as a 50% seeding dose (SD50)15 with more than 103-fold higher sensitivity than detection of PrP-res by WB16. Therefore, RT-QuIC may be more useful than WB for measuring anti-prion effects17. The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of anti-prion compounds on seeding activity using the RT-QuIC method and compare the results with PrP-res levels to determine whether RT-QuIC can improve screening for prion disease drugs.

Results

Seeding activity of cell cultures persistently infected with prions can be measured by RT-QuIC

To first determine the seeding activity of prion-infected cells, suspensions of N2a58 cells persistently infected with the FK1 or 22L strain were used for quantification by the Endpoint RT-QuIC method (Fig. 1). RT-QuIC reactions were performed in four independent wells using each diluted cell suspension as a seed. No increase in thioflavin T fluorescence was observed in uninfected N2a58 cells or without cell seeding (PBS only), whereas an increase in fluorescence was observed relatively quickly in all wells when more than 5 prion-infected cells were added (Fig. 1A). To clearly quantify seeding activity, the RT-QuIC reaction was performed three times and the mean value was calculated to determine the 50% seeding dose per 106 cells (SD50/106 cells) (Fig. 1B). Log SD50/106 cells values for N2a58/FK1 and N2a58/22L were 6.97 ± 0.14 and 6.22 ± 0.29, respectively (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Quantification of seed activity in prion-infected cells using Endpoint RT-QuIC. (A) RT-QuIC assays were performed with serial dilutions of N2a58/FK1, N2a58/22L, and N2a58 cell lysates (4 wells/each dilution). Representative results are shown. (B) Positive response rates for RT-QuIC at each dilution in three independent experiments are shown in the graphs; Log SD50/106 cells (mean ± standard deviation) was calculated by the Spearman-Kärber method. Positive results were considered when the fluorescence value of ThT increased more than twofold above the reference value.

Table 1.

Seeding activity in anti-prion compounds treated prion-infected cells.

Passage No. Log SD50/106cell (mean ± standard deviation)
Untreated Congo red Alprenolol PPS
N2a58/FK1 N2a58/22L N2a58/FK1 N2a58/22L N2a58/FK1 N2a58/22L N2a58/FK1 N2a58/22L
0 6.97 ± 0.14 6.22 ± 0.29
1 6.05 ± 0.25 5.47 ± 0.72 6.30 ± 0.43 5.38 ± 0.29 6.22 ± 0.14 4.63 ± 0.14
2 4.80 ± 0.43 4.47 ± 0.38 4.63 ± 0.52  < 3.80 5.47 ± 0.14  < 3.38
3  < 3.22  < 3.3  < 3.80  < 3.55 4.47 ± 0.14
6 5.13 ± 0.52
9 4.72 ± 0.29

N2a58/FK1 treated with PPS exhibited persistent seeding activity

Seeding activities of N2a58/FK1 and N2a58/22L cultured in the presence of Congo red, alprenolol, or PPS (which have reported anti-prion effects) were quantified by RT-QuIC. Seeding activities of prion-infected cells treated with Congo red or alprenolol both decreased and became below the detection limit after the sixth passage (P6) (Fig. 2 and Table 1). In the presence of PPS, the seeding activity of N2a58/22L was below the detection limit after P3, but interestingly, that of N2a58/FK1 remained at 4.72 ± 0.29 log SD50/106 cells even after P9 (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Amounts of PrP-res in PPS-treated prion infected cells were decreased in both 22L and FK1 strains, and almost disappeared at P2 and P3 (Fig. 4A). In contrast, no obvious change was observed for total PrP after PPS treatment.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Seeding activity in prion-infected cells treated with anti-prion compounds. Prion-infected N2a58 cells were treated with Congo Red, Alprenolol, or PPS from P0 to P6. For each passage, prion seeding activity (Log SD50/106 cells) was quantified from three independent experiments using RT-QuIC (mean ± standard deviation). Open circles and squares indicate N2a58/FK1 and N2a58/22L, respectively. Asterisks indicate less than the limit of detection (L.D.).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Timecourse of PrP-res levels and seeding activity of prion-infected cells treated with PPS continuously or removed after P3. (A) PrP-res [PK( +)] and total PrP [PK(−)] were analyzed by WB in P1–P3 prion-infected cells cultured in the presence of PPS and P25 prion-infected cells after excluding PPS. Total protein content of N2a58/FK1 cell lysate per lane was 60 μg and 20 μg for PK( +) and PK(−), respectively; for N2a58/22L, 45 μg and 15 μg were used for PK( +) and PK(−), respectively. UT represents untreated cells. The full-length blot image is provided in the Supplementary Fig. 1. (B) For each passage, prion seeding activity (Log SD50/106 cells) was quantified from three independent experiments using RT-QuIC (mean ± standard deviation). Open circles and open squares indicate N2a58/FK1 with PPS and N2a58/22L with PPS, respectively. Closed circles indicate N2a58/FK1 cultured in medium without PPS after P3. Asterisk indicates below limit of detection (L.D.).

The time course (after 6, 24, and 48 h) of PrPSc signals of N2a58, N2a58/FK1, and N2a58/22L in the presence of PPS was observed by immunofluorescence. The signal intensity of N2a58/FK1 began to decrease after 6 h of PPS treatment, followed by a clear decrease in both N2a58/FK1 and N2a58/22L cells after 24 h (Fig. 3). The signals were indistinguishable from that of uninfected cells after 48 h (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Influence of PPS on intracellular PrPSc. Prion-infected N2a58 cells were cultured with 20 μg/ml of PPS for 6, 24, or 48 h. (−) indicates no PPS treatment. Panels show merge image of PrPSc (green) and nuclei (blue). Scale bar: 10 μm.

Seeding activity and PrP-res of N2a58/FK1 were restored to original levels following PPS removal

PPS efficiently abolished PrP-res in both N2a58/22L and N2a58/FK1. However, low levels of seeding activity (3–5 log SD50/106 cells) were maintained in N2a58/FK1 even after P28 in the presence of PPS (Fig. 4B). Therefore, we investigated whether the decrease in seeding activity elicited by PPS could be recovered by removal of PPS from the culture medium. After P4, prion-infected cells were cultured in medium without PPS. Thereafter, the seeding activity of N2a58/FK1 gradually increased such that by P25, seeding activity and PrP-res levels had returned to initial levels (Fig. 4A,B). In contrast, seeding activity and PrP-res did not recover in N2a58/22L (Fig. 4A).

Inhibitory effect of PPS on the PrPSc conversion reaction in PMCA varied greatly among prion strains

We next used the PMCA method to examine whether PPS directly inhibited the PrPSc conversion reaction and whether this inhibitory effect differed among prion strains. PMCA is a method to promote the conversion reaction by fragmenting18,19 or depolymerizing PrP multimers20 by intermittent sonication using PrPC in brain homogenate as a substrate18. Compared with RT-QuIC, PMCA can amplify PrPSc without being significantly affected by solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide. In fact, the anti-prion effect of cationic tetrapyrrole dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide using PMCA has been reported21. PPS was added to the reaction mixture at a four-fold dilution from a final concentration of 10 mg/ml to 2.44 μg/ml, and five prion strains (FK1, 22L, Chandler, ME7, and mBSE) were used as seeds. Inhibition of the PrPSc conversion reaction of PPS was strongest in ME7 (significant decrease at 2.44 μg/ml or higher), followed by Chandler (39 μg/ml or higher) and 22L (156 μg/ml or higher), but occurred in FK1 and mBSE only at 10 mg/ml (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Inhibitory effect of PPS on PMCA. (A) Brain homogenates of prion-infected mice were used as seeds for PMCA with a four-fold serial dilution of PPS (10 mg/ml, 2.5 mg/ml, 0.625 mg/ml, 0.156 mg/ml, 39 μg/ml, 9.8 μg/ml, and 2.4 μg/ml). Representative images of WB of PrP-res are shown. The corresponding full-length blot images, and blots for each of the three independent PMCA experiments are provided in the Supplementary Figs. 25. (B) For each PPS concentration, the intensity of PrP-res was quantified from three independent experiments (mean ± standard deviation). Control represents PMCA without PPS and is set at 100%. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with control.

Discussion

In the present study, we found that even after PPS elicited the disappearance of PrP-res from N2a58/FK1, RT-QuIC results indicated that a measurable level of seeding activity remained despite passaging 28 times in the presence of PPS. Furthermore, this residual seeding activity and loss of PrP-res recovered to original levels after PPS removal, indicating that the FK1 strain continues to grow at levels below the PrP-res detection limit in the presence of PPS. The concentration of PPS administered to cultured cells in this study (20 μg/ml) was higher than those used in some previous reports using prion-infected cultured cells2224. In addition, the efficacy of antiprion drugs would be expected to increase inversely correlated with a decrease in the amount of PrP-res itself in the cells. Thus, it can be assumed that PPS is present in excess relative to the amount of PrP-res, which has decreased below detectable levels after PPS administration in the FK1-infected cells. Although we cannot completely rule out the possibility that the PPS concentration did not reach a level that could completely suppress the seeding activity of the FK1 strain, the fact that seeding activity was not lost even in the presence of excessive amounts of PPS indicates that it is unlikely that the concentration of PPS used was not sufficient.

Previously, it was known that latent prion infections between heterologous animals occur in what is often referred to as a "carrier state," in which PrP-res accumulation and seeding activity is present in the host body but does not cause disease25. For example, in a study conducted in the United Kingdom (UK) investigating the presence of variant CJD carriers in 32,441 appendix samples, 16 were positive for PrP-res26. It would be interesting to see how many of these samples would be positive when examined by RT-QuIC. It has also been reported that seeding activity can remain for long periods of time even in PrP knockout mice27. Although it should be cautious to compare the phenomenon in cultured cells in this study to latent prion infection at the individual level, it is important to better understand the pathological significance of a condition in which seeding activity can be maintained for a long period of time even when PrP-res is negative.

In contrast, the seeding activity of N2a58/22L was reduced to below the detection limit and did not recover after PPS removal. This result is consistent with previous reports indicating that PrP-res did not return after PPS treatment of scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells4 or a transformed deer cell line persistently infected with chronic wasting disease followed by passaging in PPS-free medium23.

Although PPS inhibited the PrPSc conversion reaction in PMCA, this effect varied greatly depending on the strain, with much weaker inhibitory effects observed for FK1 and mBSE strains compared with scrapie-derived mouse adapted strains ME7, Chandler, and 22L. FK1 is a mouse-adapted strain of GSS (P102L mutation), a hereditary prion disease, while mBSE is a mouse-adapted strain of classical BSE. The fact that both these strains were resistant to PPS suggests a gap in the conversion mode between them and the three scrapie-derived strains. The results of PMCA may explain why low-level persistent prion infection keeping measurable seeding activity occurred only in N2a58/FK1. Specifically, heparin, a type of polyanion, binds to PrPC28 and promotes prion replication in PMCA29. PPS, a heparin analog, may compete with heparin or directly interact with PrPC independently of heparin3033 to inhibit prion replication in vitro and in vivo. Accordingly, differences in the final PrPSc structure of each prion strain led to differences in the conversion process of PrPC bound to heparin and/or PPS, which may be the reason why the anti-prion effect of PPS was strain-dependent. Intraventricular infusion of PPS prolonged the survival of mice infected with RML (the alias of Chandler strain) or FK1, but prolongation of the FK1 incubation period was reportedly shorter than that of RML, demonstrating strain dependence of the anti-prion effect of PPS at the animal level9. Although the relevance to PPS is unclear, it has also been reported that, unlike Chandler and 22L, FK1-infected cultured cells exhibited significant changes in PrP-res in response to autophagy accelerators and inhibitors34, which may corroborate differences in conversion mode and PrPSc structure.

Clinical trials of PPS for patients with prion disease have been conducted in Japan35 and the UK10,11. Although there is a report of one case in which postmortem examination showed a significantly reduced level of PrP-res in the brain compared with levels in brains without PPS treatment36, there was no obvious improvement in clinical symptoms in any case of familial, ectopic, or sporadic CJD treated with PPS in Japan35. Notably, in two clinical studies of UK patients with variant CJD, three out of four10 and four out of five patients11 survived longer than those who did not receive PPS treatment. These differences may result from variations in the efficacy of PPS depending on the subtype of CJD. At present, it remains difficult to determine whether PPS is effective for treating patients with CJD because the number of patients is small and outcome criteria are unclear.

Previous screening has typically identified anti-prion compounds targeting inhibition of PrP-res accumulation in prion-infected cell cultures37. In this study, we demonstrated that seeding activity can remain even after PrP-res is lost in a strain-dependent manner. Therefore, the highly sensitive seeding activity measured by RT-QuIC is a useful indicator for screening of prion disease therapeutics in prion-infected cultured cells, whereas measurement of PrP-res levels alone is likely insufficient. Furthermore, the finding that different prion strains exhibit varying effects to drugs is yet another factor complicating the development of therapeutic agents for prion diseases3840. Screening of prion-infected cells is limited by the difficulty of persistently infecting cells with certain prion strains, especially CJD. Our results show that even for prion strains that cannot be persistently infected in cultured cells, PMCA may be able to predict an inhibitory effect on the prion strain.

In conclusion, we have shown that PPS induces low-level persistent prion infection keeping measurable seeding activity without PrP-res detection in a strain-dependent manner.

Methods

Cell culture

The establishment of a mouse PrP-overexpressing neuroblastoma cell line (N2a58) and 22L-infected N2a58 cells (N2a58/22L) was described previously41. FK1-infected N2a58 cells (N2a58/FK1) were also described separately42. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Cat. No. 08458-16; Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin–streptomycin (Cat. No. 26253-84, Nacalai Tesque) in a 5% CO2 incubator.

Administration of Congo red, alprenolol, and PPS to prion-infected cells

Prion-infected N2a58 cells were plated in six-well plates and treated with 50 μM Congo red (Cat. No. 09403-02, Nacalai Tesque), 50 μM alprenolol (Skajilol, Kotobuki Pharmaceutical, Nagano, Japan) or 20 μg/ml PPS (Cartrophen Vet, Biopharm Australia, Bondi Junction, Australia). Concentrations of compounds added to cultured cells in this study referred to concentrations previously reported to reduce PrP-res in prion-infected cells5,6,22. Cells were passaged every 4 days and sampled each time for WB and RT-QuIC assays.

Western blotting of cell lysates

Cell lysates were collected in lysis buffer [0.5% Triton X-100, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 150 mM NaCl, and 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5)]. Total protein concentrations of cell lysates were quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (#23225; Pierce, Waltham, MA, USA). Cell lysate samples were digested with 10 μg/ml PK at 37 °C for 30 min, subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on NuPAGE 12% BisTris gels (Cat. No. NP0343; Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Cat. No. IPVH00010; Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Membranes were subsequently treated with Blocking One (Cat. No. 03953-95, Nacalai Tesque) for 1 h at room temperature. T2 antibody, a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-PrP monoclonal antibody that recognizes mouse PrP135-14043, was diluted 5000-fold and used as the primary antibody. Chemiluminescence was detected using EzWest Lumi plus (Cat. No. WSE-7120L; ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). Images were obtained by LuminoGraph I (WSE-6100, ATTO, Tokyo, Japan), a chemiluminescence imaging apparatus.

RT-QuIC

Cells seeded for conversion reaction were dissociated from dish with 20 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and subjected to RT-QuIC. Numbers of cells were counted with a hemocytometer. Recombinant mouse PrP (rMoPrP 23–231) was purified as previously described12. Cells serially diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were added to 95 μl of reaction buffer [500 mM NaCl, 25 mM PIPES (pH 7.0), 10 μM thioflavin T, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.001% SDS] in 96-well plates (Cat. No. 265301; Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA). The reaction was performed in samples alternately shaken and incubated for 30 s each using an Infinite F200 (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). SD50 values were calculated using the Spearman–Kärber method.

Quantification of the inhibitory effect of PPS on PMCA

Investigation of optimal conditions for PMCA using brain homogenates, especially sonication conditions, has been previously described44. ICR mouse brains were homogenized at 10% (w/v) in PMCA buffer (4 mM EDTA and 1% Triton-X100 in PBS) using a Beads Crusher (Beads Crusher μT-12; TAITEC, Saitama, Japan) and rotation at 4 °C for 1.5 h. PMCA samples were prepared by adding 5 μl of serial diluted PPS solution to 45 μl of 10% (w/v) ICR mouse brain homogenate with 0.01% (w/v) prion-infected mouse brain, 0.3 mg/ml heparin, and 0.05% digitonin. The mixture was loaded into 0.2-ml PCR tube eight-strips (Cat. No. SKPCR8D; Seiko, Tokyo, Japan) along with 2-mm zirconia beads (Cat. No. ZB-20; TOMY, Tokyo, Japan) and positioned on the floated plate holder of a Cup horn sonicator (Misonix-3000; Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). PMCA was performed for 16 h, consisting of 30 min incubation at 40 °C followed by a 20-s pulse of sonication. PMCA products were digested with 40 μg/ml of PK buffer and heated to 95 °C for 10 min in SDS sample buffer. SDS-PAGE was performed using 15% Tris–glycine gels. Western Blotting was then performed using the method described above. CS Analyzer (ATTO) was used to measure the intensity of the detected PrP-res bands; to quantify the inhibitory effect of PPS on PMCA and to compare between different blots, the intensity of PrP-res without PPS on the same membrane was set to 100%.

Preparation of PrPSc seed for PMCA

Mouse-adapted scrapie strains 22L, Chandler, ME7, as well as mouse-adapted classical BSE (mBSE) were propagated in ICR mice. The mouse-adapted GSS strain Fukuoka-1 (FK1) was kindly provided by N. Nishida (Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan). Preparation of prion-infected brain homogenates was previously described29.

Ethics approval

ICR mice (11 weeks old, female) for PMCA experiments were obtained from SLC, Japan. No animal experiments were conducted in the experiments described in this manuscript. All experimental protocols using animal tissues were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Miyazaki (approval ID: 2019-010) and were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Immunofluorescence assay

N2a58, N2a58/22L, and N2a58/FK1 cells were grown on four-well chambered slide cover glass (Cat. No. 154917, Nunc) and treated with 20 μg/ml PPS. Cells were washed with PBS and then fixed with pre-warmed 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS containing 4% sucrose for 10 min. After permeabilization with 0.1% Triton-X100 for 10 min, cells were treated with 5 M guanidine thiocyanate for 10 min and blocked with 5% fetal bovine serum in PBS. Next, cells were incubated with anti-PrP mouse monoclonal antibody 132 (mAb132) to detect PrP45. Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated monoclonal anti-mouse IgG (Cat. No. A11017, Life Technologies Corporation) was used as the secondary antibody. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Statistical analysis

For WB after PMCA, statistical significance was calculated by Dunnett's multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures. (243.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Hiromi Iguchi and Minako Ohno for technical assistance. We also thank Motohiro Horiuchi for providing the antibody and Takeshi Yamasaki for sharing the immunofluorescence assay workflow, and Noriyuki Nishida and Takehiro Nakagaki for providing the cell lines. We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author contributions

H.T. and R.A. conceived the experiments. H.T. performed most of the experiments. T.M., M.I., and R.A. guided the experiments. H.T. and R.A. wrote the manuscript. All authors analyzed data and reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by MSD Life Science Foundation, Public Interest Incorporated Foundation, Takeda Science Foundation, and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP21K07277 and JP18H0272. This work was also supported by research grants (20KA1003) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-12049-z.

References

  • 1.Prusiner SB. Molecular biology of prion diseases. Science. 1991;252:1515–1522. doi: 10.1126/science.1675487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sim VL. Prion disease: Chemotherapeutic strategies. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2012;12:144–160. doi: 10.2174/187152612800100161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Teruya K, Doh-Ura K. Insights from therapeutic studies for PrP prion disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2017 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a024430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caughey B, Raymond GJ. Sulfated polyanion inhibition of scrapie-associated PrP accumulation in cultured cells. J. Virol. 1993;67:643–650. doi: 10.1128/JVI.67.2.643-650.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caughey B, Race RE. Potent inhibition of scrapie-associated PrP accumulation by congo red. J. Neurochem. 1992;59:768–771. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miyazaki Y, et al. Identification of alprenolol hydrochloride as an anti-prion compound using surface plasmon resonance imaging. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019;56:367–377. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1088-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Diringer H, Ehlers B. Chemoprophylaxis of scrapie in mice. J. Gen. Virol. 1991;72(Pt 2):457–460. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-2-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Farquhar C, Dickinson A, Bruce M. Prophylactic potential of pentosan polysulphate in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Lancet. 1999;353:117. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05395-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Doh-ura K, et al. Treatment of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy by intraventricular drug infusion in animal models. J. Virol. 2004;78:4999–5006. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.10.4999-5006.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bone I, Belton L, Walker AS, Darbyshire J. Intraventricular pentosan polysulphate in human prion diseases: An observational study in the UK. Eur. J. Neurol. 2008;15:458–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Newman PK, et al. Postmortem findings in a case of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease treated with intraventricular pentosan polysulfate. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2014;85:921–924. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Atarashi R, et al. Ultrasensitive human prion detection in cerebrospinal fluid by real-time quaking-induced conversion. Nat. Med. 2011;17:175–178. doi: 10.1038/nm.2294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Atarashi R, Sano K, Satoh K, Nishida N. Real-time quaking-induced conversion: A highly sensitive assay for prion detection. Prion. 2011;5:150–153. doi: 10.4161/pri.5.3.16893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hermann P, et al. Biomarkers and diagnostic guidelines for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:235–246. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30477-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wilham JM, et al. Rapid end-point quantitation of prion seeding activity with sensitivity comparable to bioassays. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001217. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takatsuki H, et al. Rapid and quantitative assay of amyloid-seeding activity in human brains affected with prion diseases. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Candelise N, et al. Applications of the real-time quaking-induced conversion assay in diagnosis, prion strain-typing, drug pre-screening and other amyloidopathies. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2017;17:897–904. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1368389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C. Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature. 2001;411:810–813. doi: 10.1038/35081095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gonzalez-Montalban N, et al. Highly efficient protein misfolding cyclic amplification. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001277. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Igel-Egalon A, et al. Reversible unfolding of infectious prion assemblies reveals the existence of an oligomeric elementary brick. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006557. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Massignan T, et al. A cationic tetrapyrrole inhibits toxic activities of the cellular prion protein. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23180. doi: 10.1038/srep23180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yamasaki T, Suzuki A, Hasebe R, Horiuchi M. Comparison of the anti-prion mechanism of four different anti-prion compounds, anti-PrP monoclonal antibody 44B1, pentosan polysulfate, chlorpromazine, and U18666A, in prion-infected mouse neuroblastoma cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Raymond GJ, et al. Inhibition of protease-resistant prion protein formation in a transformed deer cell line infected with chronic wasting disease. J. Virol. 2006;80:596–604. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.596-604.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wagner W, Ajuh P, Lower J, Wessler S. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of prion-infected neuronal cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2010;8:28. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-8-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Race R, Raines A, Raymond GJ, Caughey B, Chesebro B. Long-term subclinical carrier state precedes scrapie replication and adaptation in a resistant species: Analogies to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. J. Virol. 2001;75:10106–10112. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10106-10112.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gill ON, et al. Prevalent abnormal prion protein in human appendixes after bovine spongiform encephalopathy epizootic: Large scale survey. BMJ. 2013;347:f5675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Martin Davy, Reine Fabienne, Herzog Laetitia, Igel-Egalon Angélique, Aron Naima, Michel Christel, Moudjou Mohammed, Fichet Guillaume, Quadrio Isabelle, Perret-Liaudet Armand, Andréoletti Olivier, Rezaei Human, Béringue Vincent. Prion potentiation after life-long dormancy in mice devoid of PrP. Brain Communications. 2021;3(2):fcab092. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Caughey B, Brown K, Raymond GJ, Katzenstein GE, Thresher W. Binding of the protease-sensitive form of PrP (prion protein) to sulfated glycosaminoglycan and congo red [corrected] J. Virol. 1994;68:2135–2141. doi: 10.1128/JVI.68.4.2135-2141.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Imamura M, et al. Heparan sulfate and heparin promote faithful prion replication in vitro by binding to normal and abnormal prion proteins in protein misfolding cyclic amplification. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:26478–26486. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.745851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shyng SL, Lehmann S, Moulder KL, Harris DA. Sulfated glycans stimulate endocytosis of the cellular isoform of the prion protein, PrPC, in cultured cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:30221–30229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.50.30221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Taubner LM, Bienkiewicz EA, Copie V, Caughey B. Structure of the flexible amino-terminal domain of prion protein bound to a sulfated glycan. J. Mol. Biol. 2010;395:475–490. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Teruya K, et al. Heparinase I-specific disaccharide unit of heparin is a key structure but insufficient for exerting anti-prion activity in prion-infected cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015;460:989–995. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.03.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Petrosyan R, Patra S, Rezajooei N, Garen CR, Woodside MT. Unfolded and intermediate states of PrP play a key role in the mechanism of action of an antiprion chaperone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2021 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010213118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ishibashi D, et al. Strain-dependent effect of macroautophagy on abnormally folded prion protein degradation in infected neuronal cells. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0137958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tsuboi Y, Doh-Ura K, Yamada T. Continuous intraventricular infusion of pentosan polysulfate: Clinical trial against prion diseases. Neuropathology. 2009;29:632–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2009.01058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Terada T, et al. Less protease-resistant PrP in a patient with sporadic CJD treated with intraventricular pentosan polysulphate. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2010;121:127–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kocisko DA, et al. New inhibitors of scrapie-associated prion protein formation in a library of 2000 drugs and natural products. J Virol. 2003;77:10288–10294. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.19.10288-10294.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kocisko DA, et al. Comparison of protease-resistant prion protein inhibitors in cell cultures infected with two strains of mouse and sheep scrapie. Neurosci. Lett. 2005;388:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.06.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Giles K, et al. Different 2-aminothiazole therapeutics produce distinct patterns of scrapie prion neuropathology in mouse brains. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015;355:2–12. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.224659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Teruya K, et al. A single subcutaneous injection of cellulose ethers administered long before infection confers sustained protection against prion diseases in rodents. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1006045. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nishida N, et al. Successful transmission of three mouse-adapted scrapie strains to murine neuroblastoma cell lines overexpressing wild-type mouse prion protein. J. Virol. 2000;74:320–325. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.1.320-325.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nakagaki T, et al. FK506 reduces abnormal prion protein through the activation of autolysosomal degradation and prolongs survival in prion-infected mice. Autophagy. 2013;9:1386–1394. doi: 10.4161/auto.25381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hayashi H, et al. Effect of tissue deterioration on postmortem BSE diagnosis by immunobiochemical detection of an abnormal isoform of prion protein. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2004;66:515–520. doi: 10.1292/jvms.66.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fujihara A, et al. Hyperefficient PrP Sc amplification of mouse-adapted BSE and scrapie strain by protein misfolding cyclic amplification technique. FEBS J. 2009;276:2841–2848. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yamasaki T, et al. Characterization of intracellular localization of PrP(Sc) in prion-infected cells using a mAb that recognizes the region consisting of aa 119–127 of mouse PrP. J. Gen. Virol. 2012;93:668–680. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.037101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures. (243.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES