Skip to main content
Journal of Animal Science logoLink to Journal of Animal Science
. 2022 Feb 20;100(5):skac051. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac051

Dietary supplementation with lysine (protein) stimulates mammary development in late pregnant gilts

Chantal Farmer 1,, Marie-France Palin 1, Russell C Hovey 2, Tara D Falt 2, Lee-Anne Huber 3
PMCID: PMC9109004  PMID: 35184195

Abstract

The goal of this project was to determine if standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine provided at 40% above estimated requirements, with the concomitant increase in protein intake, from days 90 to 110 of gestation would stimulate mammary development in gilts. From day 90 of gestation, Yorkshire × Landrace gilts were fed 2.65 kg of either a conventional diet (CTL, control, n = 19) providing 18.6 g/d of SID Lys or a diet providing 26.0 g/d of SID Lys via additional soybean meal (HILYS, n = 19). Both diets were isoenergetic. Jugular blood samples obtained on days 90 and 110 of gestation were used to measure concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), metabolites, and amino acids (AA). Gilts were necropsied on day 110 ± 1 of gestation to obtain mammary glands for compositional analyses, immunohistochemistry, and analysis of mRNA abundance for AA transporters and markers of cell proliferation and differentiation. The HILYS gilts gained more body weight (P < 0.01) during the experimental period compared with CTL gilts, and had greater fetal weights (1.29 vs. 1.21 ± 0.03 kg, P < 0.05). There was no difference in circulating IGF-1, glucose, or albumin (P > 0.10) between HILYS and CTL gilts on day 110 of gestation, whereas concentrations of urea and free fatty acids were greater (P < 0.01), and those of Trp and Ala were lower (P < 0.05), in HILYS than CTL gilts. The provision of lysine at 40% above estimated requirements increased total mammary parenchymal mass by 44%, as well as total parenchymal fat, protein, DNA, and RNA (P < 0.01). The mRNA abundance of ACACA was greater (P < 0.05) in HILYS than CTL gilts, while only the AA transporter SLC6A14 tended (P < 0.10) to be greater. Results demonstrate that providing dietary Lys above current National Research Council recommendations in late gestation increases mammary development in gilts. Results also indicate that Lys may have been limiting for protein retention. These data suggest that the use of a two-phase feeding strategy during gestation, whereby dietary Lys is increased from day 90, could benefit potential sow milk yield in the subsequent lactation.

Keywords: feeding, gestation, gilt, lysine, mammary development, swine

Lay Summary

Results indicate that the current National Research Council recommendations for dietary lysine during late pregnancy in pigs, the period when most mammary gland development takes place, are underestimated. From days 90 to 110 of gestation, gilts were fed 2.65 kg of either a conventional diet providing 18.6 g/d of standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine, or a diet providing 26.0 g/d of SID lysine via the inclusion of additional soybean meal. Diets were isoenergetic. Feeding 26.0 g/d of SID lysine increased the mass of mammary parenchymal tissue (where milk is synthesized) by 44%. Findings suggest that a greater mammary uptake of lysine in supplemented sows supported enhanced accretion of mammary parenchyma. Such information is most pertinent in the actual context where milk yield of hyperprolific sows must be maximized to sustain optimal growth of all their piglets. Furthermore, these data indicate that the use of a two-phase feeding strategy during gestation, whereby dietary lysine is increased from day 90, could benefit potential sow milk yield in the subsequent lactation.


Feeding 26.0 g/d of standardized ileal digestible lysine to gilts, with all other amino acids to lysine ratios meeting or exceeding National Research Council (NRC) recommendations, from days 90 to 110 of gestation increases the mass of mammary parenchymal tissue by 44%. Results indicate that the current NRC recommendations for dietary lysine during late pregnancy in pigs are underestimated.

Introduction

Lysine is the first limiting amino acid (AA) in most swine diets. Numerous studies were conducted to investigate its requirement prior to parturition (Gourley et al., 2020) and during lactation (NRC, 2012; Gourley et al., 2017; Hojgaard et al., 2019; Greiner et al., 2020) to support optimal sow performance. These studies are important given the current increase in litter size which has led to impedance of piglet growth due to inadequate milk supply (Kobek-Kjeldager et al., 2020). The role of dietary Lys supply for reproductive performance in gilts may start as early as during the growing period, where increasing the Lys-to-energy ratio in prepuberty and gestation improved the subsequent performance of their litters as reflected by increased piglet birth weight, number of piglets weaned, and average piglet weaning weight in first parity (Tuong et al., 2021). However, it is not known if this beneficial effect was due to the greater Lys intake before or after mating. Furthermore, another study showed no increase in piglet birth weight or average daily gain during lactation with semi ad libitum compared with restricted feeding for an 80 d period before mating (Klaaborg et al., 2019). During gestation, it was reported that an increase of total Lys intake above 11 g/d from day 5 (Thomas et al., 2021) or day 30 of gestation (Cooper et al., 2001) did not improve sow productivity, although the focus of these studies was on sow body weight (BW) changes without considering mammary tissue accretion.

Lysine is most important during late gestation when the majority of fetal and mammary growth occurs. More specifically, extensive accretion of mammary tissue takes place beyond day 90 of gestation (Sorensen et al., 2002), yet the specific AA requirements to support this essential process are not known. The energy requirement during late pregnancy in gilts and sows is relatively constant, whereas their protein requirements increase markedly (Ji et al., 2006; Krogh et al., 2020). The standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys requirement for sows during gestation was reported to increase from 5.6 g/d in the first 60 d of gestation to 8.8 g/d for the remainder of gestation (Kim et al., 2009), and from 6.8 g/d in the first 70 d of gestation to 15.3 g/d thereafter for gilts (Ji et al., 2005). Samuel et al. (2012) also determined such an increase in Lys requirement between early (24 to 45 d) and late (86 to 110 d) gestation in sows. During the last 12 d of gestation, mammary growth was estimated to account for 16.8% of SID Lys requirements (Feyera and Theil, 2017). Early studies showed no effect of increasing protein (from 216 to 330 g/d; Weldon et al., 1991) or Lys intake (4, 8, or 16 g/d; Kusina et al., 1999a) on mammary development during late gestation. However, the 4 and 8 g/d treatments in the latter study failed to support maximal milk yield in the subsequent lactation (Kusina et al. 1999b). In a recent study, the provision of 20.6 g/d instead of 14.7 g/d of SID Lys to sows from day 90 of gestation increased piglet weight gain in the following lactation (Che et al., 2019). One possible explanation for this positive outcome was enhanced mammary development due to greater intake of AA.

When the uptake of nutrients by the mammary glands and their rates of extraction were used to estimate the supply of essential AA to the mammary glands, it appeared not to be a limiting factor for the growth of the mammary parenchyma in late pregnant sows (Krogh et al., 2017). The uptake of AA by mammary tissue depends on specific transport systems, where Lys is predominantly transported via the CAT-1 (encoded by SLC7A1) and ATB0,+ (encoded by SLC6A14) transporters (reviewed by Wu et al., 2020). Expression of the genes for these transporters and those involved in cell proliferation and differentiation may be altered by supplementary Lys. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to determine the impact of a 40% increase in SID Lys intake from days 90 to 110 of gestation in gilts on mammary development, metabolic status, and mammary mRNA abundance of AA transporters and markers of cell proliferation and differentiation.

Materials and Methods

Animals were cared for according to a recommended code of practice (CCAC, 2009) following procedures approved by the institutional animal care committee of the Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Animals and treatments

A total of 38 Yorkshire FAST × Landrace FAST gilts (Groupe Cérès Inc., Saint-Nicolas, QC, Canada) were bred via artificial insemination using pools of semen from Duroc Super Gain Plus boars (Centre d’Insémination Porcine du Québec, Saint-Lambert-de-Lauzon, QC, Canada). Gestating gilts were housed in individual pens (1.5 × 2.4 m), from mating until day 89 of gestation, they were fed one daily meal (0800 hours) of a conventional corn-based diet (12.75 MJ/kg DE, 11.24% CP, and 0.57% lysine). The amounts fed were determined from a commercial chart based on BW and backfat thickness (BF) as follows: gilts weighing 135 to 159 kg at mating were fed 2.45, 2.30, 2.15, and 1.95 kg, respectively, for a BF of ≤9, 10 to 12, 13 to 15, or ≥16 mm. Gilts weighing 160 to 194 kg at mating were fed 2.65, 2.50, 2.30, and 2.05 kg for the same BF categories. From day 90 of gestation, all gilts were fed 2.65 kg of either a conventional diet (CTL, control, n = 19) providing 18.6 g/d of SID Lys with all other AA meeting or exceeding National Research Council (NRC) recommendations (2012) or a diet providing 26.0 g/d of SID Lys via the inclusion of additional soybean meal (HILYS, n = 19) with all other AA to Lys ratios meeting or exceeding NRC recommendations. Diets were isoenergetic on a net energy (NE) basis (see Table 1 for the composition of experimental diets). Feed samples for AA analysis were collected every 2 wk. Gilts were weighed and their BF was measured ultrasonically (WED-3000, Schenzhen Well D Medical Electronics Co., Guangdong, China) at P2 of the last rib at mating and on days 90 and 110 of gestation. On days 90 and 110 of gestation, blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture before the meal (between 0700 and 0800 hours) following a 16 h fast. Gilts were necropsied on day 110 ± 1 of gestation to obtain mammary glands for compositional analyses, immunohistochemistry, and measures of mRNA abundance. The uterus was removed and fetuses were counted and weighed, and the ovaries were weighed and the number of corpora lutea was counted.

Table 1.

Ingredient composition and nutrient contents of experimental diets (as-fed)

Item CTL1 HILYS
Ingredient composition, %
 Corn 55.45 42.76
 Wheat 20.00 20.00
 Soybean meal, dehulled, solvent extracted 20.50 32.00
 Soybean oil 0.92 2.18
 Di-calcium phosphate 1.40 1.22
 Limestone 1.15 1.15
 Sodium chloride 0.30 0.30
 Vitamin and mineral premix2 0.20 0.20
dl-Met 0 0.07
l-Thr 0 0.04
 Choline chloride 70%3 0.08 0.08
 Total 100.00 100.00
Calculated nutrient contents4
 NE, kcal/kg 2,500 2,500
 Crude protein, % 16.56 21.07
 SID Lys, %5 0.70 0.98
 SID Arg, % 0.94 1.27
 SID His, % 0.40 0.50
 SID Ile, % 0.58 0.77
 SID Leu, % 1.24 1.50
 SID Met, % 0.24 0.36
 SID Met + Cys, % 0.50 0.67
 SID Phe, % 0.71 0.91
 SID Phe + Thr, % 1.17 1.50
 SID Thr, % 0.50 0.70
 SID Trp, % 0.17 0.24
 SID Val, % 0.65 0.84
 Total Ca, % 0.87 0.87
 STTD phosphorus, % 0.37 0.37
Analyzed nutrient contents
 Crude protein, % 15.36 21.44
 Lys, % 0.80 (0.82)5 0.94(1.12)
 Arg, % 0.86 (1.02) 1.10 (1.37)
 His, % 0.42 (0.45) 0.52 (0.57)
 Ile, % 0.60 (0.66) 0.73 (0.87)
 Leu, % 1.39 (1.41) 1.61 (1.71)
 Met, % 0.24 (0.28) 0.33 (0.40)
 Met + Cys, % 0.51 (0.59) 0.68 (0.77)
 Phe, % 0.82 (0.81) 1.00 (1.04)
 Phe + Tyr, % - (1.34) - (1.72)
 Thr, % 0.55 (0.61) 0.69 (0.82)
 Trp, % - (0.20) - (0.26)
 Val, % 0.66 (0.76) 0.79 (0.97)
 Ca, % 0.58 0.60
 Phosphorus, % 0.55 0.58
 Crude fat, % 3.45 2.47

CTL: control, Lys provided at estimated requirements for gilts between days 90 and 114 of gestation (NRC, 2012); HILYS: Lys provided 1.4× above estimated requirements via the addition of soybean meal.

Provided the following amounts of vitamins and trace minerals per kg of diet: vitamin A, 1,000 IU; vitamin D3, 1,500 IU; vitamin E, 40 IU; vitamin K, 2.5 mg; vitamin B12, 20 µg; thiamin, 0.97 mg; riboflavin, 4 mg; d-pantothenic acid, 20 mg; niacin, 20 mg; folic acid, 4.9 mg; biotin, 0.40 mg; pyridoxine, 3.0 mg; Fe, 80 mg as Fe2(SO4)3; Zn, 101 mg as ZnO; Mn, 40 mg as MnO2; Cu, 15 mg as CuSO4; Se, 0.30 mg as Na2SeO3; Cr, 0.20 mg as C9H15CrO6 (Nutreco Canada, INC., Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada).

Choline chloride (70%; Jefo, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada).

Based on nutrient concentrations in feed ingredients according to the NRC (2012).

Calculated total AA contents are shown in parentheses.

Blood handling and assays

The concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), glucose, free fatty acids (FFA), urea, albumin, and AA were measured in blood samples. Samples for urea (20 mL) were collected into vacutainer tubes without anticoagulant (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and held at room temperature for 3 h, stored overnight at 4 °C, centrifuged for 12 min at 1,800 × g at 4 °C the following day, before the serum was harvested. Blood samples for IGF-1, FFA, albumin, and AA assays (30 mL) were collected in EDTA tubes (Becton Dickinson), put on ice, and centrifuged within 20 min for 12 min at 1,800 × g at 4 °C, from which plasma was immediately recovered. Finally, blood samples for glucose analysis (6 mL) were collected into tubes containing 12 mg of potassium oxalate and 15 mg of sodium fluoride to inhibit glycolysis, held on ice, and centrifuged within 20 min at 1,800 × g for 12 min at 4 °C, and the plasma was recovered immediately. Serum and plasma samples were stored at −20 °C. Concentrations of IGF-1 were measured with a commercial RIA kit for human IGF-1 (ALPCO Diagnostics, Salem, NH) with small modifications as previously detailed (Plante et al., 2011). The assay was validated using a pooled plasma sample from sows, as previously described (Plante et al., 2011). Sensitivity of the assay was 0.10 ng/mL, while the intra- and interassay coefficients of variability (CVs) were 5.17% and 4.20%, respectively. Glucose was measured by an enzymatic colorimetric method (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA). Assay validation was performed using a plasma pool from gestating sows, where parallelism was 100.8%, and the average mass recovery was 95.5%. Intra- and interassay CVs were 1.67% and 2.69%, respectively. Urea was measured colorimetrically using an autoanalyzer (Auto-Analyser 3; Technicon Instruments Inc., Tarrytown, NY) according to the method of Huntington (1984). Intra- and interassay CVs were 3.29% and 0.50%, respectively. Concentrations of FFA were measured by colorimetry (Wako Chemicals) having intra- and interassay CVs of 1.94% and 4.05%, respectively. The plasma albumin concentrations were analyzed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bromocresol Green [BCG] Albumin Assay; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The intra- and interassay CVs were 4.79% and 3.72%, respectively.

Plasma-free AA concentrations were analyzed according to the methods of Boogers et al. (2008) and using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography and Empower Chromatography Data Software (Waters Corporation, Milford, CT). The experimental diets were analyzed for AA using the performic acid oxidized hydrolysis procedure (AOAC, 2005; method 994.12) and were quantified via ion-exchange chromatography with post-column derivatization with ninhydrin according to Llames and Fontaine (1994).

Mammary gland measurements

At necropsy, mammary glands from one side of the udder (aiming for seven glands) were excised for measures of mammary composition. Glands were frozen and stored at −20 °C, then were cut transversally into 2-cm slices while frozen, prior to being stored again at −20 °C. Each slice was later trimmed of skin and teats and the mammary parenchymal tissue was dissected from surrounding adipose tissue (i.e., extraparenchymal tissue) at 4 °C. Parenchyma from all dissected and sliced glands was homogenized and a representative sample was used to determine composition by chemical analysis. The RNA content of parenchymal tissue was measured by ultraviolet spectrophotometry (Volkin and Cohn, 1954) and the DNA content of parenchymal tissue was evaluated in all samples using a method based on fluorescence of a DNA stain (Labarca and Paigen, 1980). Dry matter (method 950.46; AOAC, 2005), protein (method 928.08; AOAC, 2005), and lipid content (method 991.36, AOAC, 2005) were also determined in the parenchyma. Both RNA and DNA contents were reported on a dry matter basis.

The contralateral row of mammary glands was used to measure the relative mRNA abundance of selected genes in the parenchyma. Samples from the fourth anterior glands were frozen in liquid nitrogen within 15 min after necropsy and were stored at −80 °C. Samples from the fifth gland were collected for histology and immunohistochemistry, fixed in 4% neutral buffered paraformaldehyde for 24 h at 4 °C, then washed twice with and stored in 70% ethanol prior to embedding in paraffin.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

To measure the circumference of alveolar lumens, paraffin-embedded samples were sectioned at 4 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Random images were captured (QICAM Fast 1394; Q-Capture Pro 7) from all corners and the center of each section. The circumference of the apical surface for at least 10 alveolar lumenae per field (average of 56 lumenae per animal) was manually traced (Image-Pro Express 6.3) and length was determined relative to a stage micrometer. For immunohistochemistry, paraffin-embedded serial sections (4 μm) were stained for Ki67 as an indicator of cell proliferation, or for phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A (pSTAT5A) as an indicator of activated cellular signaling. Sections were rehydrated and pretreated with 0.3% Triton-X in PBS before steaming in citrate buffer (pH = 6; Antigen Retrieval Solution; Sigma-Aldrich) and blocking for endogenous biotin (Avidin/Biotin Block, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). Sections were blocked with 10% horse serum then incubated overnight at 4 °C with either a rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67 antibody (RRID:AB_2341197; 1:50; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) or a rabbit monoclonal anti-pSTAT5A antibody (RRID:AB_823649; 1:50; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; Phospho-STAT5 (Tyr694)(C11C5) Rabbit mAb detects endogenous levels of STAT5a only when phosphorylated at Tyr694). Sections were rinsed in 0.05% PBS-Tween20 and incubated with a biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (1:350; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.). Immunoreactivity was detected as a maroon precipitate (ImmPACT NovaRED, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) against a hematoxylin counterstain. Random images were captured using a QICAM Fast 1394 camera with Q-Capture Pro 7 software from all corners and the center of each section. Immuno-positive and -negative nuclei were distinguished using a blue-filtered saturation threshold. On average, 223 nuclei from each section were assessed manually (Image-Pro Express 6.3; range = 133 to 369) to determine the proportion of mammary epithelial cells that were positive for Ki67 or pSTAT5A.

Total RNA extraction, complementary DNA synthesis, and mRNA abundance of selected genes in mammary tissue

A total of 13 CTL and 13 HILYS gilts were randomly selected for qPCR analysis. Isolation of total RNA from mammary parenchyma was performed using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada) followed by DNAse I digestion directly on the columns. The concentration and integrity of extracted RNA were determined using spectrophotometry (ND-1000, NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE) and the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), respectively. The synthesis of cDNA was achieved using Superscript IV Reverse Transcriptase (200 U/mL; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and oligo(dT) 20 primers (50 μM).

The relative mRNA abundance of selected genes in mammary parenchyma was determined using real-time PCR (qPCR) as described by Caron et al. (2020). The expression of 15 candidate genes was analyzed (Table 2) including for 2 major milk proteins (alpha lactalbumin [LALBA]; beta casein [CSN2]; Manjarin et al., 2011), 9 AA transporters (solute carrier family 1 member 1 [SLC1A1]; solute carrier family 3 member 1 [SLC3A1]; solute carrier family 3 member 2 [SLC3A2]; solute carrier family 6 member 14 [SLC6A14]; solute carrier family 7 member 1 [SLC7A1]; solute carrier family 7 member 2 [SLC7A2]; solute carrier family 7 member 6 [SLC7A6]; solute carrier family 7 member 7 [SLC7A7]; solute carrier family 7 member 9 [SLC7A9]; Manjarin et al., 2011; Huber et al., 2016), 2 markers of cell division/proliferation (cytoskeleton associated protein 2 [CKAP2]; claspin [CLSPN]; Trott et al., 2021), 1 gene involved in de novo fatty acid biosynthesis (acetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha [ACACA]; Lv et al., 2015), and 1 gene involved in mammary epithelial cell transcytosis of IgG during colostrogenesis (Fc fragment of IgG receptor and transporter [FCGRT]; Stark et al., 2013). The qPCR reactions and cycling conditions were as previously described (Farmer and Palin, 2021). Table 2 provides details on primer sequences used for each gene with their corresponding amplification efficiencies (E = 10[−1/slope]). For each gene, standard curves were generated with serial dilutions of cDNA pools (Labrecque et al., 2009) to provide relative mRNA quantification using the standard curve method (Applied Biosystems, 1997). A standard curve (in duplicate) was included in each 96-well plate to account for experimental variation across plates. The expression of three reference genes (Table 2) was also determined (Apoptosis inhibitor 5 [API5], Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39 [MRPL39], and VAMP-associated protein B and C [VAPB]). Using the NormFinder algorithm (Vandesompele et al. 2002) from Excel-Tools-Add-ins, the combination of API5 + VAPB was identified as the best combination of reference genes to be used for mRNA abundance normalization and to obtain relative quantification values for each gene. Mean values from triplicates were used for statistical analyses.

Table 2.

Primer sequences used for real-time PCR amplification of candidate genes1

Genes Primer sequences (5ʹ–3ʹ)2 GenBank accession no. Product size (bp) Amplification efficiency (%)3
Gene
ACACA (F)CAGAGCTAGGCTAGGAGGAATA
(R)ATCCAGGTTTGCAGGATCAG
NM_001114269 94 99.37
CKAP2 (F)CTATGTCTTCTGGGCAGTAAGTG
(R)GGGTACTGAGATCAAGGTAGGA
XM_003130956 101 99.38
CLSPN (F)GTGACCAGGACTCAGTGAAAG
(R)GCCTTGGGAAGAGGCATAAA
XM_021095922 104 103.53
CSN2 (F)AAGCCTTTCAAGCAGTGAGGAA
(R)TCTGGCGTTCATTCTCTGTTTG
NM_214434 101 98.98
FCGRT (F)CCTGAATGGCGAGGAGTTTAT
(R)GGAAGGTCTTCTCCTTGTTGAC
NM_214197 131 102.08
LALBA (F)TCCTGGATGATGACCTTACT
(R)TCTGAACAGAGTGCTTTATGG
NM_214360 101 103.09
SLC1A1 (F)GTTACCCGTTGGTGCTACTATC
(R)TGCCCAAGTCCAAGTCATTC
NM_001164649 98 99.49
SLC3A1 (F)CCAAACCACACCAGTGATAAAC
(R)GGGTACAGTCATGCCAGATATAA
NM_001123042 94 101.43
SLC3A2 (F)CCACCAAGGACCTGTTGTTA
(R)GCCAGTGGCATTCAAATACTG
XM_003353809 101 99.20
SLC6A14 (F)GTGTTCGCTGGATTTGCTATTT
(R)GTGTTCGCTGGATTTGCTATTT
NM_001348402 128 100.21
SLC7A1 (F)CCATGCCGCGAGTTATCTAT
(R)GAGGCTAACGTGGCGATTAT
NM_001012613 106 97.01
SLC7A2 (F)GGATGAGGATGAGGATGAAGATAC
(R)TCAGGTGTCTTTGGTGATGG
NM_001110420 101 99.87
SLC7A6 (F)CCCGAAGGCCACTCTTTATT
(R)ATATCTCCTCTGGCCTCTACTC
XM_021094151 144 100.95
SLC7A7 (F)GTGAGGAGAACCCACAGATTAG
(R)GGAGGAGAAGAAAGCCTTCAG
NM_001110421 111 98.09
SLC7A9 (F)GACCAGCCTGTTCGTCATAA
(R)CGTAGAAGGGCGAAGAAACA
NM_001110171 83 103.31
Reference genes
API5 (F)TTGCAGACAGTGAGTGGAAG
(R)GTCAGGATCCGAGGGATTAAAG
XM_003122856 90 100.22
MRPL39 (F)TCAGAACCCTGAGAGAATAGTCAAAC
(R)TGCTGATACTTCATACTGGAAACAAA
XM_003132745 112 100.49
VAPB (F)TGGCGCTGGTGGTTTTG
(R)CCTACAAGGCGATCTTCCCTATG
NM_001123213 60 99.77

ACACA, acetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha; API5, apoptosis inhibitor 5; CKAP2, cytoskeleton-associated protein 2; CLSPN, claspin; CSN2, casein beta; FCGRT, Fc fragment of IgG receptor and transporter; LALBA, lactalbumin alpha; MRPL39, mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39; SLC1A1, solute carrier family 1 member 1; SLC3A1, solute carrier family 3 member 1; SLC3A2, solute carrier family 3 member 2; SLC6A14, solute carrier family 6 member 14; SLC7A1, solute carrier family 7 member 1; SLC7A2, solute carrier family 7 member 2; SLC7A6, solute carrier family 7 member 6; SLC7A7, solute carrier family 7 member 7; SLC7A9, solute carrier family 7 member 9; VAPB, VAMP-associated protein B and C.

Foward (F) and reverse (R) primers.

Amplification efficiency (E) was calculated with E = 10[−1/slope].

Statistical analyses

The MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) was used for statistical analyses. The univariate model used for mammary gland composition, gene expression, and immunohistochemistry, as well as ovarian and fetal data included the effect of treatment, with the residual error being the error term used to test for the main effects of treatment. An ANOVA with heterogeneous variances was used when necessary. The ANOVA for the weight of fetuses included litter size as a covariate. Repeated measures ANOVA with the factors treatment (the error term being gilt within treatment) and day of gestation (the residual error being the error term) and the treatment by day interaction were also carried out on BW, BF, and blood data. Separate analyses of variance for each day were also carried out on these variables. Data in tables are presented as least squares means ± maximal SEM.

Results

Growth, ovarian, fetal, and blood variables of gilts

Mean ages at mating were 222.4 and 223.5 ± 1.9 d for CTL and HILYS gilts, respectively. The BW and BF of gilts are shown in Table 3. The HILYS gilts had greater BW gain (P < 0.01) during the experimental period (days 90 to 110 of gestation) compared with CTL gilts, whereas the loss in BF did not differ (P > 0.10). Values for BW or BF on days 90 or 110 did not differ between treatments (P > 0.10). The total number of corpora lutea was not affected by treatment (P > 0.10) with a similar mean value of 20.5 for both treatment groups. The combined weight of both ovaries tended to be greater (26.9 vs. 24.0 ± 1.1 g, P < 0.10) in HILYS vs. CTL gilts. Litter size for both treatments was similar (15.7 vs. 14.3 ± 0.85 for HILYS and CTL gilts, respectively, P > 0.10), while the weight of fetuses corrected for litter size was greater in HILYS gilts (1.29 vs. 1.21 ± 0.03 kg, P < 0.05). When values for fetal weight were not corrected for litter size, treatments tended to differ (P < 0.10; 1.30 and 1.22 ± 0.03 kg for HILYS and CTL gilts, respectively).

Table 3.

Body weight and backfat thickness of gilts fed a control diet (CTL, n = 19) or a lysine-supplemented diet (HILYS, n = 19) from days 90 to 110 of gestation

Variable measured Treatment
CTL HILYS SEM1 P value
BW2, kg
 Mating 157.3 157.3 1.2 0.99
 Day 90 of gestation 201.8 202.0 2.3 0.95
 Day 110 of gestation 226.0 230.0 2.4 0.18
 Gain from days 90 to 110 24.2a 28.0b 0.7 <0.001
Backfat thickness3, mm
 Mating 18.3 18.3 0.6 0.96
 Day 90 of gestation 17.8 17.8 0.5 0.99
 Day 110 of gestation 17.6 17.2 0.5 0.55
 Loss from days 90 to 110 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.20

Maximum value for the standard error of the mean (SEM).

Treatment by day effect (P < 0.01).

Day effect (P < 0.01).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.01).

Circulating concentrations of IGF-1 and various metabolites are shown in Table 4. There were no differences in IGF-1, glucose, or albumin (P > 0.10), whereas the concentrations of urea were greater (P < 0.01) in HILYS than CTL gilts on day 110 of gestation. Concentrations of FFA were greater on both days 90 (P < 0.01) and 110 (P < 0.05) of gestation in HILYS compared with CTL gilts. Values for AA that were measured in plasma are shown in Table 5. For essential AA, concentrations of Trp were lower (P < 0.05) in HILYS than CTL gilts on day 110 of gestation, while the concentrations of Met and Phe also tended to be lower (P < 0.10) in HILYS gilts. Concentrations of the nonessential AA, Ala were lower (P < 0.01) in HILYS than CTL gilts on day 110 of gestation, and tended to be lower (P < 0.10) before the onset of treatment on day 90. Concentrations of Glu and Gly were lower (P < 0.05), while those of Pro and Tyr tended to be lower (P < 0.10) on day 110 of gestation for HILYS compared with CTL gilts. Concentrations of the essential AA His and Lys, and those of the nonessential AA Asp, Gly, and Ser were lower (P < 0.05) on day 110 than on day 90 of gestation. On the other hand, concentrations of Tyr were greater (P < 0.01) on day 110 than on day 90 of gestation.

Table 4.

Circulating concentrations of IGF-1, glucose, free fatty acids, urea, and albumin for gilts fed a control diet (CTL, n = 19) or a lysine-supplemented diet (HILYS, n = 19) from days 90 to 110 of gestation

Variable measured Treatment
CTL HILYS SEM1 P-value
IGF-12, ng/mL
 Day 90 of gestation 39.5 35.5 3.1 0.38
 Day 110 of gestation 45.0 41.1 3.2 0.39
Glucose, mMol/L
 Day 90 of gestation 3.36 3.25 0.10 0.47
 Day 110 of gestation 3.32 3.35 0.08 0.79
FFA3, µEq/L
 Day 90 of gestation 115.8a 185.3b 16.7 0.006
 Day 110 of gestation 144.1c 258.0d 38.3 0.04
Urea4, mMol/L
 Day 90 of gestation 3.78 3.77 0.21 0.96
 Day 110 of gestation 6.44a 8.34b 0.24 <0.001
Albumin, g/dL
 Day 90 of gestation 5.08 4.87 0.12 0.23
 Day 110 of gestation 5.13 5.01 0.12 0.48

Maximum value for the standard error of the mean (SEM).

Day effect (P < 0.01).

Day effect (P < 0.05).

Treatment by day effect (P < 0.01).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.01).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

Table 5.

Circulating concentrations of essential and nonessential AA in gilts fed a control diet (CTL, n = 19) or a lysine-supplemented diet (HILYS, n = 19) from days 90 to 110 of gestation

Variable measured Treatment
CTL HILYS SEM1 P-value
Essential AA, µMol/L
 Arg2
 Day 90 50e 75f 9.3 0.06
 Day 110 107 98 4.6 0.20
 His3
 Day 90 85 83 2.0 0.48
 Day 110 79 76 2.3 0.28
 Ile
 Day 90 98 111 7.3 0.20
 Day 110 115 113 4.8 0.74
 sLeu
 Day 90 156 163 25.4 0.85
 Day 110 133 126 4.5 0.24
 Lys3
 Day 90 133 133 8.0 0.95
 Day 110 96 98 5.6 0.77
 Met4
 Day 90 45 46 1.8 0.89
 Day 110 42e 35f 2.4 0.06
 Phe
 Day 90 75 76 3.5 0.89
 Day 110 74e 68f 2.0 0.06
 Thr4
 Day 90 124 120 4.7 0.59
 Day 110 107 114 3.4 0.11
 Trp5
 Day 90 57 54 2.3 0.37
 Day 110 60c 53d 2.1 0.02
 Val
 Day 90 211 179 23.7 0.34
 Day 110 187 194 5.1 0.31
Nonessential AA, µMol/L
 Ala4
 Day 90 446e 414f 13.1 0.09
 Day 110 431a 362b 14.5 0.002
 Asp6
 Day 90 9 8 0.5 0.58
 Day 110 8 7 0.4 0.20
 Cys
 Day 90 10 10 1.1 0.99
 Day 110 9 8 0.8 0.20
 Glu4
 Day 90 128 131 5.8 0.74
 Day 110 119c 104d 4.6 0.03
 Gly3
 Day 90 1012 991 48.7 0.76
 Day 110 813c 711d 28.7 0.02
 Pro
 Day 90 196 198 6.1 0.81
 Day 110 197e 183f 5.0 0.06
 Ser3
 Day 90 112 111 2.8 0.71
 Day 110 104 101 3.1 0.43
 Tyr3,5
 Day 90 89 84 3.6 0.42
 Day 110 103e 93f 3.4 0.05

Maximum value for the standard error of the mean (SEM).

Treatment by day interaction (P < 0.05).

Day effect (P < 0.01).

Tendency for a treatment by day interaction (P < 0.10).

Tendency for a treatment effect (P < 0.10).

Day effect (P < 0.05).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.01).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

Means within a row with different superscripts tend to differ (P < 0.10).

Mammary gland variables

Mammary gland composition and the abundance of mRNAs for candidate genes in the mammary parenchyma of gilts are shown in Tables 6 and 7, respectively. Feeding supplementary Lys increased mammary parenchymal mass (P < 0.01) by 44% and 42% for total and per teat values, respectively, but did not affect extraparenchymal tissue mass (P > 0.10). The only variable of parenchymal composition that changed was percent dry matter, which was greater (P < 0.05) in HILYS vs. CTL gilts, and there was also a tendency for an increased percent protein (P < 0.10) in HILYS gilts. On the other hand, the total amount of the parenchyma variables of fat, protein, DNA, DNA/teat, RNA, and RNA/teat were all increased (P < 0.01) in HILYS gilts. There was no treatment effect (P > 0.10) on alveolar circumference or on the abundance of mammary epithelial cell nuclei that were positive for either Ki67 or pSTAT5A (Table 6).

Table 6.

Mammary gland composition and immunohistochemical variables for parenchymal tissue from gilts fed a control diet (CTL, n = 19) or a lysine-supplemented diet (HILYS, n = 19) from days 90 to 110 of gestation

Variable measured Treatment
CTL HILYS SEM1 P value
Extraparenchymal tissue, g 1,691.0 1,690.2 64.8 0.99
Parenchymal tissue, g 1,437.4a 2,073.6b 121.9 <0.001
Parenchyma/teat, g 189.0a 268.5b 16.2 0.001
Parenchymal tissue composition
 Dry matter, % 37.8c 38.8d 0.7 0.04
 Fat, % of dry matter 63.3 60.3 1.5 0.17
 Fat, g total 337.2a 437.9b 21.3 0.002
 Protein, % of dry matter 32.9e 35.9f 1.2 0.09
 Protein, g total 178.4a 267.9b 18.8 0.002
 DNA, mg/g on dry matter basis 6.59 7.06 0.28 0.24
 DNA, g total 3.58a 5.25b 0.36 0.002
 DNA/teat, g 0.47a 0.68b 0.05 0.003
 RNA, mg/g on dry matter basis 7.76 8.38 0.29 0.14
 RNA, g total 4.20a 6.15b 0.37 <0.001
 RNA/teat, g 0.55a 0.80b 0.05 0.001
 Alveolar circumference, µm 141 151 10 0.35
 Ki67positive epithelial cells, % 8.5 11.3 2.4 0.33
 pSTAT5A positive epithelial cells, % 43.2 48.2 4.3 0.38

Maximum value for the standard error of the mean (SEM).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.01).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

Means within a row with different superscripts tend to differ (P < 0.10).

Table 7.

Abundance of mRNA for candidate genes in mammary parenchyma of gilts fed a control diet (CTL, n = 13) or a lysine-supplemented diet (HILYS, n = 13) from days 90 to 110 of gestation1,2

Treatment
Genes CTL HILYS SEM3 P-value
ACACA 0.80c 1.16d 0.16 0.04
CKAP2 1.04c 0.84d 0.06 0.03
CLSPN 1.13c 0.95d 0.07 0.04
CSN2 0.93 1.22 0.21 0.21
FCGRT 1.03 0.94 0.05 0.20
LALBA 0.78 1.60 0.58 0.19
SLC1A1 1.05 1.02 0.15 0.89
SLC3A1 0.92 1.00 0.12 0.58
SLC3A2 1.14a 0.79b 0.04 <0.001
SLC6A14 0.70e 1.67f 0.50 0.07
SLC7A1 0.95 0.99 0.05 0.49
SLC7A2 0.89 0.92 0.07 0.74
SLC7A6 0.98 1.06 0.06 0.26
SLC7A7 1.11 0.98 0.11 0.36
SLC7A9 0.91 1.19 0.15 0.15

ACACA, acetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha; CKAP2, cytoskeleton-associated protein 2; CLSPN, claspin; CSN2, casein beta; FCGRT, Fc fragment of IgG receptor and transporter; LALBA, lactalbumin alpha; SLC1A1, solute carrier family 1 member 1; SLC3A1, solute carrier family 3 member 1; SLC3A2, solute carrier family 3 member 2; SLC6A14, solute carrier family 6 member 14; SLC7A1, solute carrier family 7 member 1; SLC7A2, solute carrier family 7 member 2; SLC7A6, solute carrier family 7 member 6; SLC7A7, solute carrier family 7 member 7; SLC7A9, solute carrier family 7 member 9.

Values correspond to relative mRNA abundance as determined with the standard curve method, described in materials and methods.

Maximum value for the standard error of the mean (SEM).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.01).

Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

Means within a row with different superscripts tend to differ (P < 0.10).

The abundance of mRNA for ACACA was greater (P < 0.05), and that for SLC6A14 tended to be greater (P < 0.10), in the mammary parenchyma from HILYS compared with CTL gilts. On the other hand, mRNA abundance for CKAP2 (P < 0.05), CLSPN (P < 0.05), and SLC3A2 (P < 0.01) were lower in gilts fed supplementary Lys vs. in CTL gilts.

Discussion

Current results provide the first demonstration that an increase in dietary protein to supplement Lys above the NRC recommendations during late gestation (NRC, 2012) increases the accretion of mammary parenchymal tissue in gilts. The period of treatment from days 90 to 110 of gestation is when the mammary gland undergoes the majority of its development (Sorensen et al., 2002) and is responsive to external stimuli. Indeed, exogenous porcine somatotropin administered during the same period increased mammary development, with greater parenchymal mass and increased concentrations of both parenchymal DNA and RNA (Farmer and Langendijk, 2019). Interestingly, the present findings show a 44% increase in parenchymal tissue mass in response to greater Lys and protein intakes, compared with a 22% increase in response to exogenous porcine somatotropin (Farmer and Langendijk, 2019), although the mode of action likely differs given that parenchymal DNA and RNA concentrations were unchanged in the current study. Furthermore, there was no evidence of precocious milk secretion or accumulation as indicated by the similar diameter of mammary alveoli. It is therefore likely that there were more parenchymal cells of similar size amassed in HILYS gilts. Even though there was no change in the percentage of Ki67 positive cells at necropsy at day 110, enhanced cell division may have occurred prior to this time. Indeed, the proliferation of mammary epithelial cells was greater on day 90 than on day 110 of gestation in primiparous gilts (VanKlompenberg et al., 2013). In accordance with this proposal, plasma Lys concentrations were positively related to mammary cell division, vs. differentiation, in female offspring 24 h after birth (Bitsie et al., 2021). Furthermore, the drastic increase in total parenchymal tissue of HILYS gilts indicates that increased cell division must have occurred at some time. Hence the lower expression level for CKAP2, being associated with hyperplasia, was surprising and further suggests that enhanced division likely occurred earlier and was no longer apparent on day 110 of gestation.

A previous report indicated that mammary development in gilts on day 105 was unchanged when dietary protein was increased from 216 to 330 g of crude protein per day from day 75 of gestation (Weldon et al., 1991). On the other hand, when Kusina et al. (1999a, 1999b) fed 4, 8, or 16 g/d of Lys to gilts from day 25 of gestation, the two lower doses failed to support maximal milk yield in the subsequent lactation (Kusina et al., 1999b), even though mammary development on day 108 of gestation was unchanged (Kusina et al., 1999a). This beneficial effect of the highest Lys intake was proposed as being due to increased deposition of lean body mass in treated gilts. In the present study, HILYS gilts had a greater growth rate than CTL gilts, whereas BW was unchanged at the end of gestation, although whole-body and maternal chemical composition were not measured. It is important to mention that the daily intakes of SID Lys in the present study were 18.6 and 26.0 g/d for CTL and HILYS gilts, respectively, raising the possibility that the amounts of LYS fed by Kusina et al. (1999a) may have been insufficient to promote additional mammary development. The increase in mammary development reported herein also complements the findings from other recent studies, whereby increasing Lys and protein intakes in late gestation (Che et al., 2019) or during late gestation and lactation (Heo et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2008) improved the growth rate of suckling piglets. The greater weight of fetuses from HILYS gilts in the current study aligns with the 100 g increase (the tendency for a treatment effect) in birth weight reported by Che et al. (2019), and would also contribute to improved BW gain of piglets during the lactation period. On the other hand, Gonçalves et al (2016) reported no effect of feeding 20.0 g/d instead of 10.7 g/d of SID Lys from day 90 of gestation on piglet birth weight.

The mammary glands increase in weight by 50% when nursed during lactation, and an extra 0.96 g/d of total dietary Lys is needed for each piglet over 6 in a litter to support mammary growth (Kim et al., 1999). Even though mammary development was taken into consideration when nutrient requirements were estimated (NRC, 2012), the drastic increase in mammary parenchyma occurring in late gestation is most likely greater than expected. A previous report indicated that pregnant gilts require 15.3 g/d of SID Lys after day 70 of gestation (Ji et al., 2005), yet present results demonstrate that this was an underestimation. Che et al. (2019) also reported Lys requirements of at least 20.6 g/d for gilts from day 90 of gestation, while Zhang et al. (2011) suggested that Lys levels should be 0.65% to 0.75% of the diet in mid to late gestation, which is greater than current NRC recommendations (NRC, 2012). The criteria used to estimate Lys requirement, such as nitrogen retention, sow BW change, or piglet growth, affects the values obtained (Dourmad and Étienne, 2002) and it is only recently that mammary development has been considered in such estimations. Indeed, Samuel et al. (2012) noted that Lys requirements for gestating sows are less than current recommendations during early gestation (days 24 to 45), but are greater than current recommendations during late gestation (days 86 to 110), further highlighting that the dietary content of Lys needs to be increased in late pregnancy. There is no doubt that the true biological needs for Lys in gilts vary throughout pregnancy, and that feeding management should be adjusted to reflect this reality and to support optimal milk yield. Current results provide critical information to substantiate this concept. The use of a two-phase feeding program for gestating swine was already proposed by others (Ji et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2009; Gaillard et al., 2020), and would definitely be warranted for optimal mammary development.

The similar circulating Lys concentrations across treatments suggest there was greater uptake of Lys by the mammary gland, and possibly other tissues, in HILYS sows to support the enhanced deposition of parenchymal tissue. Among the circulating AA, Lys is taken up by the mammary glands of lactating sows with the greatest efficiency (Trottier et al., 1997). Furthermore, the decreased concentrations of several circulating AA in HILYS gilts in the present study suggest that Lys was limiting protein synthesis in CTL gilts. The greater supply of dietary Lys would then have also led to other AA being taken up from the circulation. This hypothesis is opposite to the findings of Che et al. (2019), whereby concentrations of valine, isoleucine, leucine, and arginine in the circulation of lactating sows supplemented with Lys were increased 1 h after the onset of farrowing. If the ratio of various AA to Lys differed between the experiments, it could have affected their uptake by mammary tissue. However, considering the similar feed ingredients used in both studies, this would not be expected. Zhuo et al. (2020) also noted increased concentrations of various AA on the day of farrowing when sows were fed supplementary soybean bioactive peptides (containing mainly arginine and glutamine as functional AA) from day 90 of gestation.

The uptake of Lys into the mammary glands of sows occurs primarily via four cationic acid transporter systems, where both Lys and Arg have the same critical transporter systems, namely CAT-1 and ATB0,+ that are encoded by the SLC7A1 and SLC6A14 genes, respectively (reviewed by Wu et al., 2020). There was only a tendency for an increase in parenchymal gene expression for SLC6A14 and a decreased gene expression for SLC3A2 in response to HILYS. Expression of the milk protein genes CSN2 and LALBA was also unaffected by treatment. The lack of any pronounced change in response to HILYS could be explained by the fact that mRNA abundance for both the CAT-1 and ATB0,+ AA transporters and for milk proteins is lower prior to farrowing compared with early or late lactation (Manjarin et al., 2011). Others previously reported a positive effect of supplemental Lys on mRNA abundance for SLC6A14 in bovine mammary epithelial cells (Lin et al., 2018), whereas Huber et al. (2016) found no effect of dietary AA balance on mRNA abundance in the mammary glands for genes encoding Lys transporters in lactating sows. On the other hand, the increased expression of ACACA in HILYS gilts in the present study is generally associated with enhanced cellular differentiation, yet its expression level is very low in gestation (VanKlompenberg et al., 2013).

The increased circulating concentrations of urea in HILYS gilts at the end of the treatment period likely reflect the greater dietary protein or more use of protein as an energy source, as was the case in the studies by Che et al. (2019) and Hong et al. (2020). The greater concentrations of FFA in plasma at the end of gestation in HILYS gilts may reflect an enhanced need for energy to support increased protein synthesis and the elimination of excess AA. On the other hand, FFA concentrations were already greater in HILYS than CTL gilts at the onset of treatment, but the increase over the experimental period was greater in HILYS than CTL gilts. In keeping with the findings of Che et al. (2019), no increases in circulating glucose or albumin at the end of gestation were recorded in the current study.

In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that the previously reported increase in the growth rate of suckling piglets raised by sows fed diets with greater Lys from day 90 of gestation (Che et al., 2019) is likely attributable to enhanced development of the mammary parenchyma during this critical period. These data indicate that current NRC recommendations (NRC, 2012) for Lys during the late pregnancy phase of rapid mammary accretion are underestimated. However, it cannot be discounted that the greater concentrations of other AA may have also come into play. Such information is most pertinent in the actual context where milk yield of hyperprolific sows must be maximized to sustain the optimal growth of all their piglets.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank A. Bernier, G. Bernatchez, É. Belley, and J. Zhu for their invaluable technical assistance, the staff of the Swine Complex, especially B. Paquette and D. Morissette, for care and slaughter of the animals, and S. Méthot for statistical analyses. Thanks to Swine Innovation Porc, CEVA Santé Animale and Zinpro Corp. for funding.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AA

amino acids

BF

backfat thickness

BW

body weight

CTL

control

FFA

free fatty acids

HILYS

high lysine

IGF-1

insulin-like growth factor-1

pSTAT5A

phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A

SID

standardized ileal digestible

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis international. 18th ed. Arlington (VA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists. [Google Scholar]
  2. Applied Biosystems. 1997. ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detections system. User bulletin No. 2. Foster City (CA): Applied Biosystems. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bitsie, B., Ison E. K., Jenkins L. P., Klopp R., McCabe C., Mills K., Nicholls G., Richards A., Shirley L., Teeple K., . et al. 2021. Mammary development in gilts at one week postnatal is related to plasma lysine concentration at 24 h after birth, but not colostrum dose. Animals. 11:1–19. doi: 10.3390/ani11102867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boogers, I., Plugge W., Stokkermans Y. Q., and Duchateau A. L. L.. . 2008. Ultra-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of amino acids in protein hydrolysates using an automated pre-column derivatization method. J. Chromatogr. A. 1189: 406–409. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caron, A., Palin M. F., Hovey R. C., Cohen J., Laforest J. P., and Farmer C.. . 2020. Effects of sustained hyperprolactinemia in late gestation on mammary development of gilts. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 72:106408. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.106408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CCAC. 2009. Canadian council on animal care guidelines on the care and use of farm animals in research, teaching and testing. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Council on Animal Care in Science. [Google Scholar]
  7. Che, L., Hu L., Wu C., Xu Q., Zhou Q., Peng X., Fang Z., Lin Y., Xu S., Feng B., . et al. 2019. Effects of increased energy and amino acid intake in late gestation on reproductive performance, milk composition, metabolic, and redox status of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 97: 2914–2926. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper, D. R., Patience J. F., Zijlstra R. T., and Rademacher M.. . 2001. Effect of energy and lysine intake in gestation on sow performance. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2367–2377. doi: 10.2527/2001.7992367x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dourmad, J. Y., and Etienne M.. . 2002. Dietary lysine and threonine requirements of the pregnant sow estimated by nitrogen balance. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2144–2150. doi: 10.2527/2002.8082144x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Farmer, C., and Langendijk P.. . 2019. Exogenous porcine somatotropin stimulates mammary development in late-pregnant gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 97:2433–2440. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Farmer, C., and Palin M. F.. . 2021. Hyperprolactinemia using domperidone in prepubertal gilts: effects on hormonal status, mammary development and mammary and pituitary gene expression. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 76:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2021.106630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Feyera, T., and Theil P. K.. . 2017. Energy and lysine requirements and balances of sows during transition and lactation: a factorial approach. Livest. Sci. 201:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gaillard, C., Quiniou N., Gauthier R., Cloutier L., and Dourmad J. Y.. . 2020. Evaluation of a decision support system for precision feeding of gestating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 98:1–12. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gonçalves, M. A., Gourley K. M., Dritz S. S., Tokach M. D., Bello N. M., DeRouchey J. M., Woodworth J. C., and Goodband R. D.. . 2016. Effects of amino acids and energy intake during late gestation of high-performing gilts and sows on litter and reproductive performance under commercial conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 94:1993–2003. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gourley, K. M., Nichols G. E., Sonderman J. A., Spencer Z. T., Woodworth J. C., Tokach M. D., DeRouchey J. M., Dritz S. S., Goodband R. D., Kitt S. J., . et al. 2017. Determining the impact of increasing standardized ileal digestible lysine for primiparous and multiparous sows during lactation. Transl. Anim. Sci. 1:426–436. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gourley, K. M., Swanson A. J., DeRouchey J. M., Tokach M. D., Dritz S. S., Goodband R. D., and Woodworth J. C.. . 2020. Effects of increased lysine and energy feeding duration prior to parturition on sow and litter performance, piglet survival, and colostrum quality. J. Anim. Sci. 98:1–10. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Greiner, L., Srichana P., Usry J. L., Neill C., Allee G. L., Connor J., Touchette K. J., and Knight C. D.. . 2020. Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows. Transl. Anim. Sci. 4:751–763. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heo, S., Yang Y. X., Jin Z., Park M. S., Yang B. K., and Chae B. J.. . 2008. Effects of dietary energy and lysine intake during late gestation and lactation on blood metabolites, hormones, milk composition and reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 88:247–255. doi: 10.4141/CJAS07060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hojgaard, C. K., Bruun T. S., and Theil P. K.. . 2019. Optimal lysine in diets for high-yielding lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 10:4268–4281. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hong, J., Fang L. H., and Kim Y. Y.. . 2020. Effects of dietary energy and lysine levels on physiological responses, reproductive performance, blood profiles, and milk composition in primiparous sows. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 62:334–347. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huber, L., de Lange C. F., Ernst C. W., Krogh U., and Trottier N. L.. . 2016. Impact of improving dietary amino acid balance for lactating sows on efficiency of dietary amino acid utilization and transcript abundance of genes encoding lysine transporters in mammary tissue. J. Anim. Sci. 94:4654–4665. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huntington, G. B. 1984. Net absorption of glucose and nitrogenous compounds by lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 67:1919–1927. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81525-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ji, F., Hurley W. L., and Kim S. W.. . 2006. Characterization of mammary gland development in pregnant gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 84:579–587. doi: 10.2527/2006.843579x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ji, F., Wu G., J. R. Blanton, Jr, and Kim S. W.. . 2005. Changes in weight and composition in various tissues of pregnant gilts and their nutritional implications. J. Anim. Sci. 83:366–375. doi: 10.2527/2005.832366x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, S. W., Hurley W. L., Wu G., and Ji F.. . 2009. Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 87(E. Suppl.): E123–E132. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, S. W., Osaka I., Hurley W. L., and Easter R. A.. . 1999. Mammary gland growth as influenced by litter size in lactating sows: impact on lysine requirement. J. Anim. Sci. 77:3316–3321. doi: 10.2527/1999.77123316x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Klaaborg, J., Carl T. N., Bruun T. S., Strathe A. V., Bache J. K., Kristensen A. R., and Amdi C.. . 2019. The effect of feeding strategy during rearing in a commercial setting on gilt body condition, lactation performance and culling rate in modern sows nursing large litters. Livest. Sci. 228:144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.08.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kobek-Kjeldager, C., Moustsen V. A., P. K. Theil., and Pedersen L. J.. . 2020. Effect of litter size, milk replacer and housing on behaviour and welfare related to sibling competition in litters from hyper-prolific sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 230:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krogh, U., Oksbjerg N., Storm A. C., Feyera T., and Theil P. K.. . 2017. Mammary nutrient uptake in multiparous sows fed supplementary arginine during gestation and lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 95:2517–2532. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krogh, U., van Vliet S., Sonderby Bruun T., Feyera T., Hinrichsen T., Friis Pedersen T., and Theil P.. . 2020. Impact of dietary energy to protein ratio and two different energy levels during late gestation on plasma metabolites and colostrum production in sows. Livest. Sci. 234:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103999 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kusina, J., Pettigrew J. E., Sower A. F., Hathaway M. R., White M. E., and Crooker B. A.. . 1999a. Effect of protein intake during gestation on mammary development of primiparous sows. J. Anim. Sci. 77:925–930. doi: 10.2527/1999.774925x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kusina, J., Pettigrew J. E., Sower A. F., White M. E., Crooker B. A., and Hathaway M. R.. . 1999b. Effect of protein intake during gestation and lactation on the lactational performance of primiparous sows. J. Anim. Sci. 77:931–941. doi: 10.2527/1999.774931x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Labarca, C., and Paigen K.. . 1980. A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal. Biochem. 102:344–352. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90165-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Labrecque, B., Beaudry D., Mayhue M., Hallé C., Bordignon V., Murphy B. D., and Palin M. F.. . 2009. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the porcine paraoxonase 3 (PON3) gene. Gene 443:110–120. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lin, X., Li S., Zou Y., Zhao F. Q., Liu J., and Liu H.. . 2018. Lysine stimulates protein synthesis by promoting the expression of ATB0,+ and activating the mTOR pathway in bovine mammary epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 148:1426–1433. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Llames, C. R., and Fontaine J.. . 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 77: 1362–1402. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lv, Y., Guan W., Qiao H., Wang C., Chen F., Zhang Y., and Liao Z.. . 2015. Veterinary medicine and omics (Veterinomics): metabolic transition of milk triacylglycerol synthesis in sows from late pregnancy to lactation. Omics 19:602–616. doi: 10.1089/omi.2015.0102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Manjarin, R., Steibel J. P., Zamora V., Am-in N., Kirkwood R. N., Ernst C. W., Weber P. S., Taylor N. P., and Trottier N. L.. . 2011. Transcript abundance of amino acid transporters, beta-casein, and alpha-lactalbumin in mammary tissue of periparturient, lactating, and postweaned sows. J. Dairy Sci. 94: 3467–3476. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. NRC. 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. Washington (DC): National Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Plante, P.-A., Laforest J.-P., and Farmer C.. . 2011. Effect of supplementing the diet of lactating sows with NuPro® on their performances and that of their piglets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 91: 295–300. doi: 10.4141/cjas2010-008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Samuel, R. S., Moehn S., Pencharz P. B., and Ball R. O.. . 2012. Dietary lysine requirement of sows increases in late gestation. J. Anim. Sci. 90:4896–4904. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sorensen, M. T., Sejrsen K., and Purup S.. . 2002. Mammary gland development in gilts. Livest. Prod. Sci. 75: 143–148. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00310-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stark, A., Vachkova E., Wellnitz O., Bruckmaier R., and Baumrucker C.. . 2013. Colostrogenesis: candidate genes for IgG1 transcytosis mechanisms in primary bovine mammary epithelial cells. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl). 97:1114–1124. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Thomas, L. L., Herd L. K., Goodband R. D., Tokach M. D., Woodworth J. C., DeRouchey J. M., Dritz S. S., Goncalves M. A. D., and Jones D. B.. . 2021. Effects of increasing standardized ileal digestible lysine during gestation on reproductive performance of gilts and sows. Animal 15:100221. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Trott, J. F., Schennink A., Horigan K. C., Lemay D. G., Cohen J. R., Famula T. R., Dragon J. A., and Hovey R. C.. . 2021. Unique transcriptomic changes underlie hormonal interactions during mammary histomorphogenesis in female pigs. Endocrinology. 163:1–27. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqab256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Trottier, N. L., Shipley C. F., and Easter R. A.. . 1997. Plasma amino acid uptake by the mammary gland of the lactating sow. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1266–1278. doi: 10.2527/1997.7551266x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tuong, N. D., Ngoc T. T. B., Hiep T., and Dang P. K.. . 2021. Effect of digestible lysine/metabolisable energy ratio in F1 (Landrace x Yorkshire) gilt diets on growth, age at puberty and reproductive performance in closed housing condition. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 9: 1347–1354. doi: 10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.9.1347.1354 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vandesompele, J., De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van Roy N., De Paepe A., and Speleman F.. . 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3:RESEARCH0034. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vanklompenberg, M. K., Manjarin R., Trott J. F., McMicking H. F., and Hovey R. C.. . 2013. Late gestational hyperprolactinemia accelerates mammary epithelial cell differentiation that leads to increased milk yield. J. Anim. Sci. 91:1102–1111. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Volkin, E., and Cohn W. E.. . 1954. Estimation of nucleic acids. Methods Biochem. Anal. 1:287–305. doi: 10.1002/9780470110171.ch11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Weldon, W. C., Thulin A. J., MacDougald O. A., Johnston L. J., Miller E. R., and Tucker H. A.. . 1991. Effects of increased dietary energy and mammary development in gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 194–200. doi: 10.2527/1991.691194x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu, Z., Heng J., Tian M., Song H., Chen F., Guan W., and Zhang S.. . 2020. Amino acid transportation, sensing and signal transduction in the mammary gland: key molecular signalling pathways in the regulation of milk synthesis. Nutr. Res. Rev. 33:287–297. doi: 10.1017/S0954422420000074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yang, Y., Heo S., Jin Z., Yun J., Shinde P., Choi J., Yang B., and Chae B.. . 2008. Effects of dietary energy and lysine intake during late gestation and lactation on blood metabolites, hormones, milk composition and reproductive performance in multiparous sows. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 62:10–21. doi: 10.1080/17450390701780227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, R. F., Hu Q., Li P. F., Xue L. F., Piao X. S., and Li D. F.. . 2011. Effects of lysine intake during middle to late gestation (day 30 to 110) on reproductive performance, colostrum composition, blood metabolites and hormones of multiparous sows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 8: 1142–1147. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.10449 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhuo, Y., Cao M., Li Y., Tang L., Li W., Jiang X., Xiao W., Liu S., Jiang X., Fang Z., . et al. 2020. Soybean bioactive peptides supplementation during late gestation and lactation affect the reproductive performance, free amino acid composition in plasma and milk of sows. Livest. Sci. 237:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Animal Science are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES