Skip to main content
Open Veterinary Journal logoLink to Open Veterinary Journal
. 2022 Apr 4;12(2):221–230. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2022.v12.i2.10

Generation of an inactivated vaccine for avian pathogenic Escherichia coli using microarrays: A more rational approach to inactivated vaccine design

Xiangmei Zhou 1,2,, Philip Richards 1,3,, Daniel Windhorst 4, Ariel Imre 1,5, Agnes Bukovinski 1, Jessica Ruggeri 6, Altayeb Elazomi 7, Paul Barrow 1,8,*
PMCID: PMC9109846  PMID: 35603079

Abstract

Background:

Escherichia coli remains a major pathogen of poultry. Most vaccines are inactivated and produced empirically. Although inactivated Salmonella vaccines have been produced by culture under conditions of Fe deprivation, no vaccines have been produced which are likely to express all the proteins expressed during infection of antigen-presenting cells.

Aim:

The aim was to produce a more protective inactivated vaccine by culturing the avian E. coli in a synthetic medium that resembled the environment of the phagolysosome.

Methods:

Global gene expression in a pathogenic avian O78:K80 strain of E. coli, harvested from infected avian macrophage-like HD11 cells, was compared by microarray with bacteria cultured in a tissue culture medium. A liquid synthetic medium was produced based on the environmental conditions identified to which the bacteria were exposed intracellularly. A bacterin was produced from this strain and its protective ability was assessed in chickens.

Results:

The changes in E. coli gene expression observed included the use of different electron acceptors and carbon sources such as ethanolamine, β-glucosides, galactonate, dicarboxylic acids, and amino acids, up-regulation of genes associated with Fe and Mn uptake, and up-regulation of type-1 and curli fimbriae, other adhesion genes and down-regulation of sialic acid synthesis genes. The bacterin produced in the synthetic medium was statistically more protective than a bacterin prepared from bacteria cultured in the nutrient broth when tested in vaccinated chickens challenged with a different virulent E. coli O78:K80 strain.

Conclusion:

The approach of using gene expression to produce synthetic media for the generation of more effective bacterins could be used for a number of intracellular bacteria pathogens including Enteroinvasive E. coli, Salmonella, and the Pasteurella/Riemerella/Mannheimia group of organisms.

Keywords: Microarray, Vaccine, Chicken, Gene expression, Synthetic medium

Introduction

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is a major poultry pathogen causing septicemia and polyserositis in the immediate post-hatching period (Nolan et al., 2013) or following infectious bronchitis (Dho-Moulin and Fairbrother, 1999) or turkey rhinotracheitis metapneumovirus infection (Picault et al., 1987).

As a taxon, APEC comprises related clusters of strains expressing a range of virulence determinants associated with individual syndromes (Gyles and Fairbrother, 2010). No single combination of virulence determinants characterizes virulence. Identified determinants include individual fimbriae and other adhesins and invasins, serum resistance factors, and toxins (Nolan et al., 2013). The availability of several annotated genome sequences (Johnson et al., 2007; Dziva and Stevens, 2008; Dziva et al., 2013; Mangiamele et al., 2013), has facilitated the identification of new candidate virulence genes. Some serotypes are associated with both avian and human infection (Johnson et al., 2007).

Although septicemia is characteristic of many poultry infections, the highest numbers of bacteria are isolated from the spleen, in addition to other organs, most probably located within macrophages (Smith et al., 1985; Barrow et al., 1998). The microbial behavior in this site and within antigen-presenting cells (APCs) is also important in initiating the immune response.

Control of infection by chemotherapy inevitably selects for antibiotic resistance, especially in countries where regulation is less stringent (Wang et al., 2010). Inactivated vaccines (bacterins) are generally regarded as being less effective than live, attenuated vaccines because the latter stimulates both humoral and cellular immunity. However, issues including the use of genetically manipulated vaccines suggest that inactivated vaccines will be used for the foreseeable future. Attempts have been made to develop more rational inactivated bacterial vaccines (Woodward et al., 2002) by culturing the bacteria under conditions of iron restriction. However, studies with Salmonella typhimurium infecting mouse macrophages (Eriksson et al., 2003) and with avian serovars in chicken macrophages (Imre et al., 2013) indicate that Fe restriction is not the only feature characterizing the intracellular environment.

We hypothesized that an analysis of the conditions inside macrophages using data generated by bacterial transcriptional analysis could lead to the development of a medium reproducing those conditions more accurately. A bacterin produced in this way should more closely resemble bacteria within macrophages and other APCs antigenically than bacteria cultured in nutrient broth (NB) and should be more protective. The Objective was therefore to infect the avian macrophage-like cell line HD11 with an APEC strain, carry out transcriptional analysis on the harvested bacteria by microarray and identify from the pattern of gene expression the environmental conditions to which the bacteria are subjected intracellularly. These conditions would be reproduced in a synthetic medium to culture the bacteria which would then be evaluated as a bacterin in chickens challenged with a different APEC strain.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture

Escherichia coli O78:K80 strains F31 and F135 were isolated from cases of avian colibacillosis. Both are virulent for chickens when inoculated parenterally (Barrow, unpublished results; Smith et al., 1985). NB (Oxoid, CM67) cultures were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. These contained between 1 and 3 × 109 cfu/ml. Bacterial enumeration was made using the method of Miles et al. (1938) culturing on MacConkey agar plates (Oxoid CM0007).

Cell culture and in vitro infection model

Avian macrophage-like HD11 cells (Beug et al., 1979) were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 20 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), 2.5% fetal calf serum (Gibco), 2.5% chicken serum (Sigma) and 10% tryptose phosphate broth (Sigma). For each bacterial infection, a total of 3 × 107 HD11 cells were seeded in each of three tissue culture flasks (175 cm2, Nunc).

Overnight NB cultures of bacterial strain F31 were diluted 20-fold in the cell culture medium described above and grown statically for 2 hours (5% CO2), then added onto the HD11 cells at a Multiplicity of Infection of ≈ 100. After co-incubation for 1 hour under the above conditions, the medium was replaced with a medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml gentamicin (Gm, Gibco). After the first 1 hour incubation, the medium was replaced with one containing 15 μg/ml Gm. Sampling points were at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours post-infection. Cells were lysed (Barrow and Lovell, 1989) for bacterial enumeration.

RNA extraction and processing

The RNA extraction protocol for F31 bacteria extracted from the infected cells and broth culture was that of Eriksson et al. (2003) and used by Imre et al. (2013). At 4 and 8 hours after infection, cells were lysed with 0.1% SDS, 1% phenol, and 19% ethanol in water for 30 minutes on ice. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation (5,000 g, 10 minutes, 4°C), treated with protective lysozyme and Proteinase K, and total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Bacterial RNA was also harvested from bacteria cultured in RPMI for 2 hours, which had been inoculated with a 20-fold dilution from the overnight NB culture, to produce bacterial numbers similar to those applied to the cell monolayers. RNA from bacteria grown in a cell culture medium was isolated using the same RNA purification kit. The quality of bacterial RNA and host RNA contamination was checked by a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). The RNA was amplified using the MessageAmp™ II-Bacteria Kit (Ambion), resulting in aminoallyl-UTP labeled amplified RNA (aRNA). For labeling, 6 µg aliquots of the aRNA samples were coupled with the fluorescent dyes Cy3 and Cy5 (Amersham). Cy3 was coupled to in vitro control RNA, while Cy5 was used to label bacterial RNA extracted from macrophages.

Microarray design and data analysis

The sequence used for the array design was the APEC O1:K1:H7 reference strain (NC_008563) (Johnson et al., 2007). All predicted ORFs were designated for probe design. The web-based Agilent eArray system (Agilent Technologies, https://earray.chem.agilent.com/earray/) was used with the following settings during the microarray probe design: Tm (70°C) matching methodology, 60-mer probe length, 3 probes/target. The protocol, experimental setup, RNA extraction, amplification, labelling, and hybridization are described in detail at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/. Data analysis was done using GeneSpring GX 10.0 (Agilent).

The ultimate purpose of this analysis was to develop a synthetic medium reproducing these conditions as near as possible. For this reason, a full analysis of gene expression was not carried out by COGs gene classes. They were grouped according to genes likely to affect intracellular survival, response to stress, and virulence gene expression as indicated below.

Synthetic Macrophage Medium (SMM-1)

The composition of the SMM-1 was: 100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 5.0, 2 mM D-glucose, 2 mM D(+)-galactose, 20 mM glycerol, 20 mM glycerol-3-phosphate, 20 mg/; L-valine, 50 mg/l L-leucine, 50 mg/l L-isoleucine, 65 mg/l L-cysteine 2HCl, 5 mg/l L-tryptophan, 1 mM MgCl2, 200 uM 2,2-dipyridyl, 500 uM Cacl2, 3 mM ZnSO4, 50 mM K2SO4, 100 mM NaCl, 7.5 mM (NH4)2SO4 in 100 ml ultrapure water. The pH was adjusted to 5 with hydrochloric acid and the final medium filter sterilized.

Bacterin production

A 5 ml aliquot of an overnight NB culture of E. coli F31 was added to 95 ml RPMI1640 medium (Invitrogen Ltd., Paisley, UK) pre-warmed to 37°C. This was incubated statically for 2 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2. Bacterial cells were recovered and washed twice in fresh SMM-1 medium or NB before being resuspended in fresh SMM-1 or NB respectively. These cultures were incubated statically at 37°C under aerobic conditions for 4 hours and the viable counts were estimated on nutrient agar (NA). A 0.2 ml aliquot of 40% formalin was added to 10 ml of the SMM-1 and NB cultures and allowed to stand for approximately 12 hours at ambient temperature followed by a 24 hours period at 4°C.

Both formalinised preparations were centrifuged at 1,500 g for 30 minutes and both pellets were resuspended separately in 10 ml PBS. 100 µl aliquots were removed and cultured in NB (37°C, overnight) to determine sterility. These formalin-treated cell suspensions were adjusted to a density equivalent to ~1 × 109 CFU/ml before use as vaccine.

Vaccination studies

Three groups (A, B, and C) of 25 1-day-old Hy-Line layers were housed in separate rooms on solid floors with shavings. At 4 and 18 days of age groups, A and B were inoculated with the bacterins without adjuvant. Birds were vaccinated simultaneously orally (100 µl with a blunt-ended needle) and intra-muscularly (100, 50 µl into each breast muscle), in the case of group A, with the SMM-1 bacterin, group B with the NB bacterin and group C with PBS. At 29 days of age, all birds were challenged intravenously with 1 × 105 cfu of a 24 hours NB culture of an O78:K80 E. coli strain F135. At 30, 31, 33 days of age, 5 birds, and at 36 days, 10 birds were killed from each group and the numbers of the inoculated challenge strain in homogenized samples of liver, spleen, and blood were counted on MacConkey agar. The protective effect was measured as reductions in the severity of frequency of morbidity if these occurred or by reductions in bacterial numbers in the blood, liver, and spleen.

Ethical approval

Animal experiments were carried out under a UK government Home Office Project and Personal Licence held by Prof. Barrow and reviewed internally by the University of Nottingham Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body prior to initiation of the work.

Results

The viable numbers of the F31 strain in the cultured HD11 cells fell from Log10 3.8 at 4 hours to 3.7 at 12 hours. RNA was therefore recovered 8 hours post-infection.

Transcriptional profile of bacteria harvested from HD11 cells

The patterns of gene expression of strain F31 in the intra-macrophage environment 8 hours after infection and grouped by activity, are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Genes showing statistically significant increases in expression of more than 10-fold are shown in Table 1. A more limited selection of genes of microbiological interest that were similarly significantly down-regulated is shown in Table 2. The ultimate purpose of this analysis was to develop a synthetic medium reproducing these conditions as near as possible. For this reason, a full analysis of gene expression was not carried out by COGs gene classes. They were grouped according to genes likely to affect intracellular survival, response to stress and virulence gene expression as indicated below (i – vi).

Table 1. Changes in gene expression in E. coli F31 cultured in HD11 cells measured by microarray which were up-regulated by greater than 10-fold after 8 hours culture in HD11 cells.

Gene class Gene Function or product Mean change in expression 8 hours
Electron transport nadA Quinolinate synthetase A 13.65
norV Flavorubredoxin oxidoreductase 35.2
sdhA Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit 11.17
ycdW Putative dehydrogenase 21.26
ydiR Predicted electron transfer flavoprotein, FAD-binding 12.13
ydjG Putative oxidoreductase 13.57
yehL Putative ATPase 14.96
ygcU Putative FAD containing dehydrogenase 11.41
- Putative dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase 10.68
Carbon sources astA Arginine N-succinyltransferase 11.69
atoA Acetyl-CoA: acetoacetyl-CoA transferase, beta subunit 10.79
bglH Carbohydrate-specific outer membrane porin, cryptic 19
cdaR Carbohydrate diacid regulator 14.79
dadX Alanine racemase 2, catabolic 15.39
dcuB Anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate transporter DcuB 19.76
dgoD 2-oxo-3-deoxygalactonate 6-phosphate aldolase/galactonate dehydratase 13.05
eutA Ethanolamine utilization protein EutA 15.23
gclR Putative regulatory protein GclR 13.01
glcC Glc operon transcriptional activator 14
gltA Citrate synthase 13.18
gmd GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase 13.11
idnK Thermosensitive gluconokinase 10.84
metF 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 11.66
rbsA Putative ribose transport ATP-binding protein RbsA 13.98
- Putative hexuronate transporter 15.61
wzb Tyrosine phosphatase 13.49
xapR Santhosine operon regulatory protein 12.77
ybbA Putative ABC-type transport protein YbbA 14.75
ydjH Putative sugar kinase 10.84
ygfT Putative NADPH-dependent glutamate synthase beta chain 18.55
ygjK Putative glycosyl hydrolase 13.39
yieL Putative xylanase 13.72
yphF ABC-type sugar transport system, periplasmic component YphF 15.39
- Putative regulatory protein, GntR family 20.87
- Putative lactate dehydrogenase 10.93
Ion and other transport cniT Putative carnitine transporter CniT 11.34
cysA Sulfate transport ATP-binding protein CysA 11.56
cysW Sulfate/thiosulfate transporter subunit CysW 10.66
entS EntS/YbdA MFS transporter 10.33
fepC Ferric enterobactin transport ATP-binding protein FepC 13.5
fes Enterochelin esterase 12.13
livJ Leu/Ile/Val-binding protein precursor 12.22
mglC Galactoside transport system permease protein MglC 23.74
mntH Manganese transport protein MntH 18.8
nhaA Na+/H antiporter, pH dependent 10.86
sbp Periplasmic sulfate-binding protein 10.39
tauC Taurine transport system permease protein TauC 19.85
ybtU Yersiniabactin biosynthetic protein 17.66
ydjE Putative metabolite transport protein 13.9
yejB Predicted oligopeptide transporter subunit 10.29
Key regulatory functions bglJ BglJ 2-component transcriptional regulator 17.08
rseA Sigma-E factor, negative regulatory protein 12.6
ycdT Predicted diguanylate cyclase 22.83
ygaA Putative sigma-54-dependent transcriptional regulator YgaA 23.69
Surface and virulence functions bfr Bacterioferritin, iron storage and detoxification protein Bfr 17.69
csgE Assembly /transport component in curli production 11.24
eaeH Attaching and effacing protein, pathogenesis factor EaeH 12.16
fimD Outer membrane usher protein FimD precursor 13.79
sinH Putative intimin/invasin (SinH-like protein) 17.4
yfcV Putative Yfc fimbriae subunit YfcV precursor 19.6
- FimF protein precursor 11.67
wcaF Putative colanic acid biosynthesis acetyltransferase 11.11
yohK Putative seritonin transporter 10.25
betB Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase, NAD-dependent 10.58
Stress responses betI Regulatory protein BetI 13.57
cpxP Periplasmic repressor of cpx regulon by interaction with CpxA 28.27
htrA Periplasmic serine protease Do, heat shock protein HtrA 19.53
osmC Osmotically inducible protein OsmC 13.14
proP Proline/betaine transporter 15.89
pspA Phage shock protein A 28.09
pspE Phage shock protein E precursor 20.53
Stress responses cpxP Periplasmic repressor of cpx regulon by interaction with CpxA 28.27
htrA Periplasmic serine protease Do, heat shock protein HtrA 19.53
osmC Osmotically inducible protein OsmC 13.14
proP Proline/betaine transporter 15.89
pspA Phage shock protein A 28.09
pspE Phage shock protein E precursor 20.53
recA DNA strand exchange and recombination protein with protease and nuclease activity 11.57
recN DNA recombination and repair protein RecN 14.4
recX Regulatory protein for RecA 12.03
rseA Sigma-E factor, negative regulatory protein 12.6
rspA Starvation sensing protein RspA 10.89
umuC Mutagenesis and repair protein UmuC 33.2
umuD Mutagenesis and repair protein UmuD 17.42
- Putative phage lysin 54.63
ygaA Putative sigma-54-dependent transcriptional regulator YgaA 23.68
Miscellaneous marA Multiple antibiotic resistance protein MarA 12.75
psiA PsiA—plasmid SOS inhibition 10.72
traN TraN—mating pair stabilisation protein 12.8
traR TraR—quorum sensing and plasmids 14.39
traW TraW—transfer pilus assembly F plasmid 15.02

Table 2. Changes in gene expression in E. coli F31 cultured in HD11 cells measured by microarray which were down-regulated by greater than 10-fold after 8 hours culture in HD11 cells.

Gene class Gene Function or product Mean change in expression 8 hours
Electron transport and metabolism fdnG FdnG, alpha subunit of formate dehydrogenase-N 13.92
napA Periplasmic nitrate reductase precursor 20.72
napC Nitrate reductase, cytochrome c-type, periplasmic 15.05
narG Nitrate reductase 1, alpha subunit 16.09
narH Nitrate reductase 1, beta (Fe-S) subunit 10.38
narI Respiratory nitrate reductase 1 gamma chain 11.15
nirB Nitrite reductase, large subunit, NAD(P)H-binding 17.43
nirD Nitrite reductase (NAD(P)H) subunit 20.94
pykF Pyruvate kinase 1 15.72
Surface and virulence functions kpsC Capsule polysaccharide export protein KpsC 13.53
kpsM Polysialic acid transport protein KpsM 14.68
kpsS Polysialic acid capsule synthesis protein KpsS 12.56
kpsT Polysialic acid transport ATP-binding protein KpsT 16.01
neuA Acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase 50.32
neuB Sialic acid synthase NeuB 24.04
neuC Polysialic acid biosynthesis protein 45.91
neuD Sialic acid synthase NeuD 32.51
neuS Poly-alpha-2,8 sialosyl sialyltransferase NeuS 42.5
nmpC NmpC precursor 41.75
ompF OmpF 38.29
ompN Outer membrane protein N precursor 34.26

(i) Electron transport. Upregulation of putative oxido-reductases and dehydrogenases coincided with downregulation of nitrate and nitrite reductases including nirBD (nitrite reductase), narGHI (nitrate reductase), and napAC (nitrate reductase with additional functions). Pyruvate kinase I (pykF) and formate dehydrogenase sub-unit I (fdnG) were also down-regulated. This suggested that the macrophage phagolysosome environment had a relatively high redox value as indicated by Turner et al. (2003).

(ii) Carbon sources. A number of different loci associated with carbon sources utilized by the bacteria showed changes in expression although there was no clear picture. There was evidence that dicarboxylates were utilised as carbon sources suggested by up-regulation of the dcuB transporter gene and a diacid regulator cdaR. The gntR gene which regulates the gnt1 operon associated with gluconate utilization was up-regulated. The involvement of gluconate was emphasised by the up-regulation of idnK, a gluconate kinase. Expression of glcC was up-regulated. This is an activator of the glc operon which is associated with the transformation of glycolate to glyoxalate, and therefore may also be associated with osmotic stress rather than a prime carbon source (Núñez et al., 2001). Its regulation requires Integration Host Factor which affects virulence and responses to stressful conditions. Glyoxalate is also an important intermediate in the glyoxalate bypass involved in acetate or fatty acids as major energy sources (Pellicer et al., 1999). Other carbohydrates such as ethanolamine, mannose, and xylan may also have been important although the evidence through up-regulation of single genes eutA, gmd, and yieL, respectively was not strong as indicated by low changes in gene expression.

(iii) Transport. Many of the transport genes up-regulated in macrophages were associated with the uptake of carbohydrates and other potential carbon sources. These included galactoside transport permease (mglC), a C4-dicarboxylate binding protein (dcuB, mentioned above), a putative hexuronate transporter, and transport proteins for oligopeptides (yejB), and long-chain fatty acids (fadL). Up-regulation of genes encoding ion transport proteins for sulfate (cysA, cysW, sbp, tauC), manganese (mntH), and ferric iron (fepC, entS, fes, ybtU), and iron storage (bfr) indicated restriction for these ions.

(iv) Stress. In comparison with growth in NB, the bacteria were subjected to higher osmotic stress as indicated by a number of genes related to the biosynthesis of betaine (betAB), its regulator (betL), proP which transports both proline and betaine and osmC. The heat stress-related proteins htrA and cpxP were up-regulated. Stresses to DNA are indicated by up-regulation of recA and its regulator recX, recN, and umuC, and umuD. This is probably also linked to increased prophage activity with a number of genes up-regulated including pspA and pspE, a prophage integrase, intD and a putative phage lysin.

(v) Surface and virulence proteins. The major virulence genes up-regulated were associated with fimbriae elaboration (csgE, fimD, fimF, and yfcV) and adhesins/invasins (eaeH and sinH). One of the colanic acid biosynthesis genes wcaF was up-regulated. These changes were accompanied by down-regulation of genes associated with sialic acid capsule formation. Genes encoding surface porins OmpF, NmpC, and the OmpN precursor were also down-regulated.

Confirmation of levels of gene expression by qRT-PCR was not carried out. Although there are some limitations in the range of signal intensity obtainable with microarrays, most publications show very good correlation between levels of expression measured by microarray and by qRT-PCR or other quantitative methods, including E. coli in vitro (Richmond et al., 1999), Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli in contact with rabbit cells (Dahan et al., 2004), S. typhimurium in murine macrophages (Eriksson et al., 2003), in human and canine epithelial cells (Hautefort et al., 2008), the chicken intestine (Dhawi et al., 2011; Harvey e t a l., 2011) and with four different Salmonella enterica serovars in HD11 cells (Imre et al., 2013).

Synthetic medium and vaccine development

The microarray results showed changes in gene expression indicative of availability of gluconate, succinate, and cysteine with Fe and Mn restriction and osmotic and heat stress, although the preferred carbon source was unclear. This information combined with published literature, indicating low phagosome pH, (Rathman et al., 1996), was used to develop a synthetic medium (SMM-1), the full composition which is described in Materials and Methods. This was used to generate a bacterin of E. coli F31 for vaccination studies.

Vaccination experiment

The protective effects of the F31 bacterin produced by culture in medium SMM-1 against intravenous challenge of an O78:K80 strain F135 compared to those induced by a bacterin prepared using the same strain cultured in NB are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. The effect of vaccination with bacterins produced by culture in NB or SMM-1 on the numbers of E. coli F135 in the tissues of chickens challenged intravenously. Log10 (± SD) of E. coli F135 in the blood, liver or spleen together with the number of chickens in each group from which the challenge strain was isolated.

Day Medium Synthetic NB Control
Blood Spleen Liver Blood Spleen Liver Blood Spleen Liver
Day 1 Mean 0.93 ± 1.92 0.84 ± 1.70 3.29 ± 0.31 0.94 ± 1.93 1.49 ± 1.08 2.97 ± 0.99 1.27 ± 1.66 1.93 ± 1.10 3.53 ± 0.55
No. +ves 1 of 5 1 of 5 5 of 5 1 of 5 3 of 5 5 of 5 2 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5
Day 2 Mean <1±0.00 <1 ± 0.00 1.9 ± 0.69 1.08 ± 2.23 1.16 ± 1.84 2.15 ± 1.70 1.01 ± 1.88 0.9 ± 1.16 2.56 ± 1.04
No. +ves 0 of 5 0 of 5 5 of 5 1 of 5 2 of 5 4 of 5 2 of 5 2 of 5 5 of 5
Day 4 Mean <1 ± 0.00 <1 ± 0.00 <1 ± 0.00 <1 ± 0.00 <1 ± 0.00 0.58 ± 0.72 0.88 ± 1.79 0.69 ± 1.36 0.78 ± 1.56
No. +ves 0 of 5 0 of 5 0 of 5 0 of 5 0 of 5 2 of 5 1 of 5 1 of 5 1 of 5
Day 7 Mean <1 ± 0.00 <1 ± 0.00 <1 ± 0.00 <1 ± 0.00 0.32 ± 0.70 0.27 ± 0.54 0.22 ± 0.40 1.08 ± 1.50 0.37 ± 0.85
No. +ves 0 of 10 0 of 10 0 of 10 0 of 10 1 of 10 1 of 10 1 of 10 4 of 10 1 of 10
Total +ve/organ 1 0f 25 1 of 25 10 of 25 2 of 25 6 of 25 10 of 25 6 of 25 11 of 25 12 of 25
TOTAL +ve 12 of 75 18 of 75 29 of 75

None of the birds showed any signs of illness. Tissue samples from a proportion of the birds from both the unvaccinated birds and those which had been vaccinated with the bacterin prepared from NB remained infected while the birds vaccinated with the bacterin cultured in the synthetic SMM-1 medium had cleared the challenge bacteria from their tissues almost by day 4 post-challenge.

A comparison of the number of samples from which the challenge strain was isolated revealed a statistically significant difference between control unvaccinated and the NB vaccine group (χ2 = 3.75, p = 0.05), and between the control and synthetic medium group (χ2 = 8.45, p = <0.01) but no statistically significant difference between the nutrient both and synthetic medium groups (χ2 = 1.01, p = 0.4). The differences were more marked for the blood and spleen samples than for the bacterial counts in the liver. Compared with the control group the level of significance for the synthetic medium group was higher than for the NB bacterin group.

Discussion

Vaccination is more desirable than chemotherapy to control APEC. Early protection mediated by high titre circulating specific antibodies may be important as indicated by the protection against parenteral avian Salmonella infections using the commercial Salenvac vaccine which stimulates high titer antibodies (Woodward et al., 2002). That high titer antibody correlates to some extent with protection is indicated by the fact that passively transferred antibody may protect against challenge with the homologous strain (Arp, 1980; Bolin and Jensen, 1987; Kariyawasam e t al., 2004).

The ultimate purpose of this analysis was to develop a synthetic medium reproducing these conditions as near as possible. For this reason, a full analysis of gene expression was not carried out by COGs gene classes. They were grouped according to genes likely to affect intracellular survival, response to stress, and virulence gene expression.

Our microarray studies here were designed to identify genes likely to affect intra-cellular survival, response to stress, and virulence gene expression. Although detailed analyses of gene expression were not carried out it was clear that the experiments showed that E. coli O78:K80 when established within avian macrophages, show patterns of physiology that are different from growth in liquid RPMI medium. These changes include a trend toward respiration with oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor indicating that oxygen was available as the preferred electron acceptor. There were indications from individual genes (gntR, gmd, glcC, yieL, and dcuB) that different carbohydrates (gluconate, mannose, glycolate, xylan, and dicarboxylate acids, respectively) may have been used but the picture was not clear from the small number of genes involved in each case.

Osmotic stress was indicated by the expression of osmY and osmC (Yim and Villarejo, 1992) and the proU operon encoding a transport system for glycine, betaine, and proline, two osmo-protectant compounds (Haardt et al., 1995). In the absence of solid information on the importance of amino acids to E. coli within the macrophage, information was taken from the literature and from Imre et al. (2013) to develop SMM-1. Manganese was omitted and iron availability was restricted by the addition of 2, -2-dipyridyl. Osmolarity was adjusted with K+ and Na+ to a water activity less than that in RPMI.

The SMM-1 medium clearly did not reflect all of the conditions within the macrophage. This was an approximation since the major carbon sources were unclear and we modeled this to include a reduction in glucose availability. Further studies could evaluate this in more detail and include incubation at a temperature closer to that of birds (41.5°C) which could also lead to even better immunogenicity and protection.

The bacterin produced by culture in the synthetic medium produced a level of protection above the control which was more statistically significant than the bacterin produced by culture in NB. We propose that such an approach may be used for several bacterial pathogens for which inactivated vaccines are still produced regularly and this approach merits further investigation.

Funding

The corresponding author would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Lower Saxony Federal Government (SLP137) and of a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), UK China Partnership Award (CPA 1497) to Barrow.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest associated with this work.

Authors contribution

All authors consented to participation in the work and its publication. Barrow and Windhorst conceived the study and Barrow and Elazomi wrote and edited the manuscript. The work was carried out by Zhou, Imre, Bukovinski and Ruggeri (microarray work), Richards (vaccine development) and Barrow (animal work).

References

  1. Arp L.H. Consequences of active or passive immunization of turkeys against Escherichia coli O78. Avian Dis. 1980;24:808–815. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrow P.A., Lovell M.A. Invasion of Vero cells by the Salmonella genus. J. Med. Microbiol. 1989;28:59–67. doi: 10.1099/00222615-28-1-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrow P.A., Lovell M.A., Berchieri A., Jnr Use of lytic bacteriophage for control of experimental Escherichia coli septicaemia and meningitis in chickens and calves. Clin. Diagnost. Lab. Immunol. 1998;5:294–298. doi: 10.1128/cdli.5.3.294-298.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beug H., von Kirchbach A., Doderlein G., Conscience J.F., Graf T. Chicken hematopoietic cells transformed by seven strains of defective avian leukemia viruses display three distinct phenotypes of differentiation. Cell. 1979;18:375–390. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolin C.A., Jensen A.E. Passive immunization with antibodies against iron-regulated outer membrane proteins protects turkeys from Escherichia coli septicemia. Infect. Immun. 1987;55:1239–1242. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.5.1239-1242.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahan S., Knutton S., Shaw R.K., Crepin V.F., Dougan G., Frankel G. Transcriptome of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 adhering to eukaryotic plasma membranes. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:5452–5459. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5452-5459.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dhawi A.A., Elazomi A., Jones M., Lovell M.A., Li H., Emes R.D., Barrow P.A. Adaptation to the chicken intestine in Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 studied by transcriptional analysis. Vet. Microbiol. 2011;153:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dho-Moulin M., Fairbrother J.M. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) Vet. Res. 1999;30:299–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dziva F., Hauser H., Connor T.R., van Diemen P.M., Prescott G., Langridge G.C., Eckert S., Chaudhuri R.R., Ewers C., Mellata M., Mukhopadbyay S., Curtiss II R., Dougan G., Wieler L.W., Thomson N.R., Pickard D.J., Stevens M.P. Sequencing and functional annotation of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli serogroup O78 strains reveal the evolution of E. coli lineages pathogenic for poultry via distinct mechanisms. Infect. Immun. 2013;81:838–849. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00585-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dziva F., Stevens M.P. Colibacillosis in poultry: unravelling the molecular basis of virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in their natural hosts. Avian Pathol. 2008;37:355–366. doi: 10.1080/03079450802216652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eriksson S., Lucchini S., Thompson A., Rhen M., Hinton J.C. Unravelling the biology of macrophage infection by gene expression profiling of intracellular Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;47:103–118. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gyles C.L., Fairbrother J.M. Escherichia coli. In: Gyles C.L., Prescott J.F., Songer J.G., Thoen C.O., editors. In: Pathogenesis of bacterial infections in animals. Ames, IO: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 267–308. [Google Scholar]
  13. Haardt M., Kempf B., Faatz E., Bremer E. The osmoprotectant proline betaine is a major substrate for the binding-protein-dependent transport system ProU of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol. Gen. Genetics. 1995;246:783–786. doi: 10.1007/BF00290728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harvey P.C., Watson M., Hulme S., Jones M.A., Lovell M.A., Berchieri A., Jr, Young J., Bumstead N., Barrow P.A. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium colonizing the lumen of the chicken intestine grows slowly and upregulates a unique set of virulence and metabolism genes. Infect. Immun. 2011;79:4105–4121. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01390-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hautefort I., Thompson A., Eriksson-Ygberg S., Parker M. L, Lucchini S., Danino V., Bongaerts R.J., Ahmad N., Rhen M., Hinton J.C. During infection of epithelial cells Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium undergoes a time-dependent transcriptional adaptation that results in simultaneous expression of three type 3 secretion systems. Cell. Microbiol. 2008;10:958–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01099.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Imre A., Bukovinski A., Lovell M.A., Li H., Zhou X., Barrow P.A. Gene expression analysis of Salmonella enterica SPI in macrophages indicates differences between serovars that induce systemic disease from those normally causing enteritis. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;167:675–679. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson T.J, Kariyawasam S., Wannemuehler Y., Mangiamele P., Johnson S.J, Doetkott C., Skyberg J.A., Lynne A.M., Johnson J.R., Nolan L.K. The genome sequence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain O1:K1:H7 shares strong similarities with human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli genomes. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:3228–3236. doi: 10.1128/JB.01726-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kariyawasam S., Wilkie B.N., Gyles C.L. Resistance of broiler chickens to Escherichia coli respiratory tract infection induced by passively transferred egg-yolk antibodies. Vet. Microbiol. 2004;98:273–284. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mangiamele P., Nicholson B., Wannemuehler Y., Seemann T., Logue C.M., Li G., Tivendale K.A., Nolan L.K. Complete genome sequence of the avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain APEC O78. Genome Announc. 2013;1(2):e0002613. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00026-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miles A.A, Misra S.S., Irwin J.O. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hygiene (Lond) 1938;38:732–749. doi: 10.1017/s002217240001158x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nolan L.K., Barnes H.J., Vaillancourt J.P., Abdul-Aziz T., Logue C.M. Colibacillosis. In: Swayne D.E., editor. In: Diseases of poultry. 13th. Ames, IO: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. pp. 751–805. [Google Scholar]
  22. Núñez M.F., Pellicer M.T., Badía J., Aguilar J., Baldomà L. The gene yghK linked to the glc operon of Escherichia coli encodes a permease for glycolate that is structurally and functionally similar to L-lactate permease. Microbiology. 2001;147:1069–1077. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-4-1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pellicer M.T., Fernandez C., Badía J., Aguilar J., Lin E.C., Baldom L. Cross-induction of glc and ace operons of Escherichia coli attributable to pathway intersection. Characterization of the glc promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:1745–1752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.3.1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Picault J.P., Giraud P., Drouin P., Guittet M., Bennejean G., Lamande J., Toquin D., Gueguen C. Isolation of a TRTV-like virus from chickens with swollen-head syndrome. Vet. Rec. 1987;121:35. doi: 10.1136/vr.121.6.135-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rathman M., Sjaastad M.D., Falkow S. Acidification of phagosomes containing Salmonella typhimurium in murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 1996;64:2765–2773. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.7.2765-2773.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Richmond C.S., Glasner J.D., Mau R., Jin H., Blattner F.R. Genome-wide expression profiling in Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:3821–3835. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.19.3821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith H.W, Cook J.K.A, Parsell Z.E. The experimental infection of chickens with mixtures of infectious bronchitis virus and Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Virol. 1985;66:777–786. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-66-4-777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Turner A.K., Barber L.Z., Wigley P., Muhammad S., Jones M.A., Lovell M.A., Hulme S., Barrow P.A. The contribution of proton-translocating proteins to the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovars typhimurium, S. gallinarum and S. Dublin in chickens and mice. Infect. Immun. 2003;71:3392–3401. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3392-3401.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang X.M., Liao X.P., Zhang W.J., Jiang H.X., Sun J., Zhang M.J. Prevalence of serogroups, virulence genotypes, antimicrobial resistance, and phylogenetic background of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in south of China. Foodborne Pathogens Dis. 2010;7:1099–1106. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Woodward M.J., Gettinby G., Breslin M.F., Corkish J.D., Houghton S. The efficacy of Salenvac, a Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serotype Enteritidis iron-restricted bacterin vaccine, in laying chickens. Avian Pathol. 2002;31:383–392. doi: 10.1080/03079450220141660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yim H.H., Villarejo M. osmY, a new hyperosmotically inducible gene, encodes a periplasmic protein in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1992;174:3637–3644. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.11.3637-3644.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Open Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli

RESOURCES