ABSTRACT
Antibiotics are the mainstay of therapy for bacterial vaginosis (BV). However, the rate of treatment failure in patients with recurrent BV is about 50%. Herein, we investigated potential mechanisms of therapy failure, including the propensity of resistance formation and biofilm activity of metronidazole (MDZ), clindamycin (CLI), and PM-477, a novel investigational candidate that is a genetically engineered endolysin with specificity for bacteria of the genus Gardnerella. Determination of the MIC indicated that 60% of a panel of 22 Gardnerella isolates of four different species were resistant to MDZ, while all strains were highly susceptible to CLI and to the endolysin PM-477. Six strains, all of which were initially susceptible to MDZ, were passaged with MDZ or its more potent hydroxy metabolite. All of them generated full resistance after 5 to 10 passages, resulting in MICs of >512 μg/mL. In contrast, only a mild increase in MIC was found for PM-477. There was also no cross-resistance formation, as MDZ-resistant Gardnerella strains remained highly susceptible to PM-477, both in suspension and in preformed biofilms. Strains that were resistant to MDZ in suspension were also tolerant to MDZ at >2,048 μg/mL when growing as biofilm. All strains were susceptible to PM-477 when grown as preformed biofilms, at minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBECs) in the range of 1 to 4 μg/mL. Surprisingly, the MBEC of CLI was >512 μg/mL for 7 out of 9 tested Gardnerella strains, all of which were susceptible to CLI when growing in suspension. The observed challenges of MDZ and CLI due to resistance formation and ineffectiveness on biofilm, respectively, could be one explanation for the frequent treatment failures in uncomplicated or recurrent BV. Therefore, the high efficacy of PM-477 in eliminating Gardnerella in in vitro biofilms, as well as its high resilience to resistance formation, makes PM-477 a promising potential alternative for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis, especially in patients with frequent recurrence.
KEYWORDS: bacterial vaginosis, metronidazole resistance, Gardnerella biofilm, endolysin, alternative to antibiotic treatment
INTRODUCTION
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a very common disorder in women of reproductive age, with a prevalence estimated at 20 to 30% worldwide (1–3). It is caused by an imbalance in the microbiome of the vagina that results mostly in discharge, irritation, and odor. Although symptoms of a single episode of BV may be mild to moderate, those patients suffering from frequently recurring BV are prone to sequelae such as infertility and early spontaneous abortion (4–6), as well as an increased risk of preterm delivery and low birth weight (7, 8), and are at high risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV (9, 10). Besides these potentially severe physiological consequences, patients with recurring and strongly symptomatic BV report a strong impact on their sex life and overall quality of life and psychological well-being, including reduced self-esteem (11).
The current model of the etiology of BV focuses on the importance of Gardnerella. It postulates that Gardnerella bacteria form an adherent biofilm on the vaginal epithelium, in which other species can proliferate, resulting in a polymicrobial biofilm (12–16).
The recommended first-line therapy for BV is antibiotic treatment, predominately with metronidazole (MDZ) or clindamycin (CLI). However, treatment failure and recurrent disease are common problems (17, 18).
MDZ belongs to the group of nitroimidazoles and only gains its full activity when it is metabolized into its hydroxy metabolite (MDZ-OH). This limits the spectrum of activity to anaerobic (19) and microaerophilic (20) bacteria. MDZ is effective in quickly reducing BV symptoms, but is associated with a high recurrence rate of up to 60% within 6 months of treatment (18). In a clinical trial where patients with recurrent BV were treated with 0.75% MDZ vaginal gel over 16 weeks, the probability of lasting cure was 70% after 16 weeks (i.e., 30% of patients had symptoms at the end of the 16-week treatment period) and declined to 34% 12 weeks after the end of therapy (i.e., at week 28) (21). Besides a possible reinfection from sexual partners, the persistence of a residual infection has been postulated as a reason for recurrence, potentially due to the formation of a biofilm that protects BV-causing bacteria from antimicrobial therapy (12, 18, 22). Another reason may be antibiotic resistance of BV pathogens. In a clinical study, the treatment of bacterial vaginosis with CLI was associated with marked antimicrobial resistance among vaginal anaerobic bacteria, while resistance to MDZ was minimal (23, 24). Nonetheless, vaginal Gardnerella isolates showed high MDZ resistance rates (16, 25–27). Resistance to CLI was found in 36% of Gardnerella patient isolates by Castro et al. (16), but in none of the isolates in other studies (26, 27).
Endolysins are promising potential alternatives to the current antibiotics, due to their ability to remove biofilms, their low propensity to the development of resistance, and their specificity to individual genera or species of bacteria (28). As an example, an endolysin targeting Staphylococcus aureus showed only minimal decrease in susceptibility when passaged with sub-bacteriostatic concentrations for 26 days, whereas the same procedure using antibiotics increased antibiotic resistance drastically (29).
The genetically engineered endolysin PM-477 was recently described as a Gardnerella-specific, highly potent antimicrobial, which was shown to dissolve the Gardnerella-dominated biofilm on exfoliated human epithelial cells in vaginal swabs from patients with BV (26). In this study, we show that Gardnerella spp. quickly develop resistance to MDZ upon serial passaging for 8 to 9 rounds with sub-MICs. Our data also support the contention that MDZ and CLI are ineffective on the majority of tested Gardnerella isolates if they are grown as a biofilm. In contrast, PM-477 effectively inhibits bacterial growth also after 25 rounds of passaging, is fully active on MDZ-resistant Gardnerella strains, and is highly active on 48- to 72-h-old preformed biofilms. In summary, we provide further data on PM-477 as a preclinical candidate under investigation for BV, especially for women with recurrent BV who failed treatment with MDZ or CLI.
RESULTS
Fifty-nine percent of tested Gardnerella type strains and patient isolates are MDZ resistant.
The MICs of MDZ, tinidazole (TDZ), CLI, and PM-477 were determined for 22 Gardnerella and 5 Lactobacillus strains following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol for anaerobic bacteria (30). The resistance breakpoints defined by EUCAST for Gram-positive anaerobes are >4 μg/mL for both CLI and MDZ (31). However, topical intravaginal antibiotic administration is recommended for BV therapy, which allows the drugs to reach concentrations of active ingredients in the mg/mL range. Therefore, in this study, we used resistance breakpoints of ≥8 μg/mL and ≥32 μg/mL for CLI and MDZ, respectively, as previously described for BV-related bacteria (27). For Gardnerella treated with MDZ, we measured MICs in the range of 8 to >256 μg/mL, with a MIC value for 90% of strains (MIC90) above 256 μg/mL (Table 1; for further details, see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Thirteen out of 22 tested isolates (59%) had a MIC for MDZ at or higher than 32 μg/mL. With regard to the different Gardnerella species, MDZ resistance rates varied from 25% for Gardnerella vaginalis to 100% for Gardnerella leopoldii and Gardnerella swidsinskii–—however, given the small number of isolates tested per species, the species-specific resistance rates are unlikely to be representative. The MIC values for MDZ and TDZ were very similar, and largely the same isolates were resistant or susceptible (Table S1), indicating very similar mechanisms of activity and resistance formation. In contrast, all Gardnerella strains of all four species were highly susceptible to CLI (MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL; range, <0.06 to 2 μg/mL) as well as to the endolysin PM-477 (MIC90, 1 μg/mL; range, <0.03 to 1 μg/mL). Lactobacilli were not susceptible to PM-477, MDZ, or TDZ, while at least the Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus jensenii strains tested were susceptible to CLI. CLI had a largely bacteriostatic effect on the two Lactobacillus gasseri strains tested, as the MIC was 32 to 64 μg/mL, while the minimum bactericidal concentration at which 99.5% of isolates are killed (MBC99.5) was above 128 μg/mL (Table S1).
TABLE 1.
MICs of metronidazole, clindamycin, and PM-477 for Gardnerella type strains and patient isolatesa
Species (no. of isolates) | Antimicrobial agent | MIC (μg/mL) |
No. (%) resistant | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Range | MIC90 | |||
G. vaginalis (8) | MDZ | 8 to 64 | 64 | 2 (25) |
CLI | <0.06 to 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | |
PM-477 | <0.03 to 0.5 | 0.5 | ND | |
G. leopoldii (3) | MDZ | 128 to >256 | >256 | 3 (100) |
CLI | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | |
PM-477 | 0.125 to 0.5 | 0.5 | ND | |
G. piotii (7) | MDZ | 8 to 128 | 128 | 4 (57) |
CLI | 0.125 to 2 | 2 | 0 | |
PM-477 | 0.5 to 1 | 1 | ND | |
G. swidsinskii (4) | MDZ | 64 to >256 | >256 | 4 (100) |
CLI | <0.06 to 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | |
PM-477 | 0.03 to 0.25 | 0.25 | ND | |
All Gardnerella (22) | MDZ | 8 to >256 | >256 | 13 (59) |
CLI | <0.06 to 2 | 0.5 | 0 | |
PM-477 | <0.03 to 1 | 1 | ND |
Resistance is defined as ≥32 μg/mL and ≥8 μg/mL for metronidazole (MDZ) and clindamycin (CLI), respectively. The MIC90 is defined as the MIC value for 90% of the tested strains. For PM-477, the resistance breakpoint is not defined; therefore, a percentage of isolates resistant is not defined (ND).
Distinct killing of Gardnerella cells in biofilms by MDZ, CLI, and PM-477.
Gardnerella-dominated biofilms covering the human vaginal epithelial cells are now generally considered a hallmark of BV. Thus, we tested how effective antibiotics and PM-477 are in penetrating and killing in vitro preformed 40- to 72-h-old biofilms of various Gardnerella strains. Interestingly, Gardnerella strains, which are all highly susceptible to CLI in suspension (MICs ranging from 0.01 to1 μg/mL), become tolerant to CLI when grown as biofilms (Table 2 and Fig. 1), with a minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of up to ≥512 μg/mL. MDZ removed the biofilms beyond the limit of detection (LOD) at MBECs ranging from 8 to 128 μg/mL, while the endolysin PM-477 was able to kill all six Gardnerella strains grown as biofilm at MBECs lower than any of the antibiotics (i.e., <2 to 32 μg/mL). The reduction in biofilm CFU of a representative Gardnerella strain (G. vaginalis ATCC 14018T) by MDZ, CLI, and PM-477 is depicted in Fig. 1. It should be noted that a reduction in CFU is a hint of but no proof for killing of the bacteria, as the treated cells could be slower growing or more difficult to dislodge. Another method frequently used to detect the reduction of biofilm biomass is crystal violet staining. This method was not used in this case, because killing of biofilm bacteria by antibiotics would not be expected to reduce the biomass of the biofilm. Instead, we chose a method by which all three antimicrobials can be compared.
TABLE 2.
MBEC values of ancestor (nonpassaged) Gardnerella isolates
Ancestor Gardnerella isolate | MBEC (μg/mL)a |
||
---|---|---|---|
MDZ | PM-477 | CLI | |
G. vaginalis | |||
ATCC 14018T | 32 | 32 | >512 |
UGent 09.07 | 32 | 16 | >512 |
UGent BV50 | 128 | 2 | >512 |
UGent BV111.5 | 32–128 | 8–32 | >512 |
UGent FB049 | 2–8 | 0.5–2 | >512 |
G. swidsinskii | |||
GS 9838-1T | 32 | <2 | >512 |
UGent BV 7.1 | 32 | 32 | <4 |
G. piotii | |||
UGent 18.01T | 8 | 8 | <4 |
UGent 21.28 | 8–32 | 2–8 | >512 |
MBEC, minimum biofilm eradication concentration; MDZ, metronidazole; CLI, clindamycin; T, after strain designation indicates a type strain.
FIG 1.
G. vaginalis (ATCC 14018T) grown in biofilm can be removed beyond the limit of detection (LOD) by metronidazole (MDZ) and PM-477, but not by clindamycin (CLI) treatment. Biofilms were grown for 40 h and then incubated for another 24 h with the indicated antimicrobial. For analysis, the antimicrobials were washed off, the biofilm was dislodged mechanically, and the surviving cells were enumerated in CFU/mL by quantitative plating. ctrl, control (medium only).
Gardnerella spp. that are initially susceptible to MDZ quickly become resistant upon serial passaging.
Six Gardnerella strains that were initially susceptible either to MDZ (G. vaginalis ATCC 14018T, MIC of 8 μg/mL) or at least to the more potent MDZ hydroxy metabolite (MDZ-OH) (MIC of between 2 and 16 μg/mL [data not shown]) were serially passaged in MDZ or MDZ-OH at sub-MICs, so that growth was impaired but not completely inhibited. Upon passaging, the MICs for both MDZ and the MDZ-OH metabolite increased strongly, and all Gardnerella strains reached the resistance breakpoint of ≥32 μg/mL within 5 rounds of passaging (Fig. 2, blue lines). After 9 rounds of passaging, 4 out of 6 strains could no longer be inhibited even by the maximal concentration in use (MIC of >512 μg/mL) (Fig. 2). In parallel, one representative of G. vaginalis (ATCC 14018T) was passaged 25 times with PM-477. The MIC of PM-477 increased only slightly over the 25 rounds of passaging, to 8 μg/mL (Fig. 2, green line).
FIG 2.
Resistance formation by serial passaging. Six Gardnerella strains were passaged for up to 25 days in the presence of metronidazole (MDZ) or the hydroxy metabolite of MDZ (MDZ-OH) at sub-MICs, as indicated in the figure key. One representative Gardnerella strain was passaged with PM-477 for 25 days, as indicated in the figure key. The MIC (μg/mL) was determined every day prior to the next round of passaging. T, after strain designation indicates a type strain.
Passaged isolates with acquired MDZ resistance remain susceptible to PM-477.
Next, we tested to what extent the resistance of Gardnerella cells toward MDZ also impacts the susceptibility to the endolysin PM-477. G. vaginalis (ATCC 14018T) passaged for 25 days on MDZ was exposed to different concentrations of MDZ and PM-477 for 1, 5, and 24 h, and then the bactericidal effect was assessed by quantitative plating on chocolate (Choc) agar plates. For the ancestral strain, there is a clear dose and time dependency of viability upon exposure to MDZ (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the G. vaginalis strain passaged on MDZ can tolerate very high concentrations of MDZ—up to 2 mg/mL—for 1 and 5 h without any loss in viability, and the treatment with 2 mg/mL for 24 h resulted in only a 2-log reduction compared to the buffer-treated control. When G. vaginalis (ATCC 14018T) was exposed to PM-477, the susceptibilities were similar for the ancestral and the passaged strains (Fig. 3B). After 1 h of treatment, 10 μg/mL PM-477 reduced a suspension of 108 CFU/mL by 3.0 and 2.8 log units for the ancestral and passaged strains, respectively. Also, the MIC values of PM-477 were very similar for ancestral and MDZ-passaged strains (Table 3). This indicates that the acquired resistance against MDZ does not interfere with the mode of action of the endolysin.
FIG 3.
Lytic effect of metronidazole (MDZ) and PM-477 on wild-type and MDZ-passaged G. vaginalis (ATCC 14018T) cells in suspension. Wild-type cells naive to MDZ and the strain passaged with sub-MICs of MDZ for 25 rounds were treated with for 1, 5, and 24 h with MDZ (A) and PM-477 (B), respectively. Ctr, control (medium only); LOD, limit of detection.
TABLE 3.
Susceptibility of Gardnerella strains before and after passaging 8 to 9 times with sub-MICs of MZD or MDZ-OHa
Gardnerella strain | Passaging antibiotic | MIC (μg/mL) |
MBEC (μg/mL) when passaged with: |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before passaging |
After passaging |
||||||||
MDZ | MDZ-OH | PM-477 | MDZ | MDZ-OH | PM-477 | MDZ | PM-477 | ||
G. vaginalis | |||||||||
ATCC 14018T | MDZ | 8 | 2 | 0.06 | >512 | >512 | 0.13 | >2,048 | 2–8 |
UGent 09.07b | MDZ-OH | 64 | 8 | 0.25 | >2,048 | >512 | 0.25 | >2,048 | 2–4 |
UGent BV50 | MDZ-OH | 32 | 4 | 0.5 | >2,048 | >512 | 0.25 | >2,048 | 1–8 |
G. swidsinskii | |||||||||
GS 9838-1T | MDZ-OH | 256 | 16 | 0.03 | >512 | >512 | 0.06 | >2,048 | 2 |
UGent BV 7.1 | MDZ-OH | 256 | 32 | 0.25 | >2,048 | >512 | 0.06 | >2,048 | 2 |
G. piotii UGent 18.01T | MDZ-OH | 32 | 8 | 1 | >2,048 | >512 | 2 | >2,048 | <1 |
All MICs were determined after 48 h of incubation. MBEC, minimal biofilm radication concentration; MDZ, metronidazole; MDZ-OH, hydroxy metabolite of MDZ; T, after strain designation indicates a type strain.
G. vaginalis UGent 09.07 was passaged only 8 times with MDZ-OH.
All MDZ- or MDZ-OH-treated passaged Gardnerella strains were still capable of forming biofilms similar in thickness and CFU count to their respective nonpassaged ancestors (data not shown). The MBEC of MDZ on Gardnerella strains passaged on MDZ or MDZ-OH was >2,048 μg/mL for all six passaged strains (Fig. 4A). Of these, only one G. vaginalis strain (ATCC 14018T) initially had a MIC below the resistance breakpoint. However, given that intravaginal MDZ (typically a 0.75% cream [i.e., 7.5 mg/mL]) can establish concentrations in the mg/mL range in vaginal fluid, we also passaged and tested strains with MICs above the EUCAST breakpoint (prepassaging MIC range, 8 to 256 μg/mL) (Table 3).
FIG 4.
Strains passaged with metronidazole (MDZ) or its hydroxy metabolite (MDZ-OH), as indicated at the top of the panels, were grown as biofilm and treated with MDZ or PM-477. The 72-h preformed biofilms were treated for 24 h with different concentrations of MDZ (A) and PM-477 (B), as indicated on the x axis, and the surviving cells were quantified. ctr, control (medium only); LOD, limit of detection. The numbers at the top of each panel (e.g., 9× MDZ) indicate how many rounds the individual strain was passaged with sub-MICs of MDZ or MDZ-OH. T, after strain designation indicates a type strain.
In contrast, all strains were highly susceptible to PM-477, with MBECs in the range of 1 to 8 μg/mL (Fig. 4B and Table 2).
DISCUSSION
There is an unmet need for new BV therapies. First-line antibiotics used to treat BV have shown cure rates at 21 to 30 days of 40% to 60% for nonrecurring BV in clinical trials (32–34), and rates were consistently below 50% if only patients with a history of recurrence were included (18, 21).
In this study, we show that Gardnerella isolates with MICs initially below 32 μg/mL for MDZ or for the more potent hydroxy metabolite MDZ-OH built up resistance to MDZ or MDZ-OH above 32 μg/mL within 5 rounds of passaging and became tolerant to concentrations of MDZ up to 2 mg/mL upon only 5 to 15 rounds. Gardnerella biofilms of all MDZ-susceptible strains could be removed beyond the LOD with MDZ treatment, with MBEC values of 8 to 128 μg/mL. While after passaging with MDZ, these strains could still grow as biofilms, these biofilms were no longer susceptible to MDZ, and the isolates had MBEC values of >2 mg/mL. It can be hypothesized that the fast resistance formation against MDZ observed here in vitro might also occur in BV patients during a course of treatment. In fact, it was reported that failure of MDZ therapy is associated with a history of BV, including its treatment (18, 35). Therefore, each further course of MDZ treatment might increase the tolerance of the bacteria for this antibiotic. Because we found that the resistance statuses across strains were comparable for MDZ and TDZ, these findings might hold for all nitroimidazoles, including secnidazole.
MDZ has been associated with fast resistance formation before: e.g., for Helicobacter pylori (36), Clostridioides difficile (37), and Prevotella (38). The relevance of MDZ resistance formation for the therapy failure of BV has been a matter of debate. In two studies published in 2004 and 2005, MDZ-resistant vaginal anaerobic bacteria, such as Gardnerella or Prevotella, were not found after intravaginal MDZ therapy (23, 24). However, these studies also showed that Gardnerella was not eradicated in more than 60% of patients. In more recent studies, MDZ-resistant Gardnerella isolates were found consistently (16, 25–27).
We also show that the synthetic endolysin PM-477 is not prone to resistance development, even after 25 passages (Fig. 2). This property may be inherent for endolysins in general (29), which has been explained by the fact that endolysins with an enzymatically active domain of the GH25 muramidase family, as is the case for PM-477, cleave conserved bonds in the peptidoglycan cell wall, which bacteria cannot easily change (39). In contrast, many mechanisms are known to lead to resistance to MDZ (40–47). Importantly, in our study, Gardnerella strains passaged on MDZ did not increase tolerance to PM-477, indicating that the mechanisms of action of PM-477 and resistance formation against MDZ are very different.
Bacteria of the genus Gardnerella form an adherent biofilm on the vaginal epithelium in which other species can proliferate, resulting in a polymicrobial biofilm (12–14, 16, 48). Therefore, we also evaluated the potency of PM-477, MDZ, and CLI on various Gardnerella strains grown as in vitro biofilms. Surprisingly, we found that when grown as biofilm, 7/9 strains tested were tolerant to 24 h of treatment with a concentration of CLI of >512 μg/mL, while the MIC and MBC99.5 values of the same strains in suspension were <1 μg/mL. In fact, a strongly reduced activity of CLI on Gardnerella growing as biofilm in vitro was shown previously (49). CLI is a bacterial protein synthesis inhibitor with a mainly bacteriostatic effect (50), so that the reduced killing efficacy of CLI on bacteria growing as biofilm may be explained by their low metabolic and protein synthesis activities (compared to planktonic bacteria in growth phase, for which MICs are usually measured). Although the natural polymicrobial biofilm found in BV patients will certainly differ in many aspects from the monospecies biofilms studied here in vitro, our findings provide a potential explanation for therapy failure upon CLI treatment, as it is likely that the metabolic activity of Gardnerella is critical for its susceptibility to CLI. Furthermore, CLI would negatively affect the population of lactobacilli, thus further destabilizing the vaginal microbiome. In fact, the clinical cure rate of CLI after 25 to 39 days reported in clinical trials never exceeded 39% (33), and there are no reports of its efficacy on patients with recurrent BV.
While our data provide potential explanations for the observed (22) failure of antibiotics to remove the biofilm associated with BV, sexual reinfection can also be a reason for recurrence (51). The treatment of episodes that recur due to sexual reinfection might, however, also fail, given the issues with MDZ and CLI described here, emphasizing the need for more effective alternatives.
In summary, this study highlights potential explanations for the failure of BV therapy with both first-line antibiotics: CLI is inactive on most Gardnerella strains when they grow as biofilm but affects lactobacilli, while MDZ (and potentially all other nitroimidazoles) allows fast resistance formation on all Gardnerella strains tested. In contrast, the genetically engineered investigational candidate lysin PM-477 kills Gardnerella cells in preformed in vitro biofilm, does not affect beneficial lactobacilli, and does not allow bacteria to become tolerant. With its high selectivity, its bactericidal potency on biofilms, and its robustness against resistance formation, we conclude that PM-477 is a potential candidate for the treatment of patients suffering from BV, particularly recurring BV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates and culture conditions.
Gardnerella isolates of different species (52) were obtained from the Laboratory of Bacteriology, University of Ghent, Belgium. These isolates include strains purchased from culture collections and fresh isolates from BV patients obtained from the University Clinic Bruges. Gardnerella isolates were grown on chocolate (Choc) agar plates (Becton, Dickinson) under anaerobic conditions in an anaerobic chamber equipped with anaerobic atmosphere generation bags (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h. All isolates were cultured in New York City broth III (NYCB), consisting of 10 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich), 15 g/L proteose peptone (Sigma-Aldrich), 3.8 g/L yeast extract (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 86 mM sodium chloride (Carl Roth), and 28 mM α-d-glucose (Sigma-Aldrich), supplemented with 10% horse serum (HS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Table S1 lists all Gardnerella and Lactobacillus isolates studied.
Preparation of PM-477.
The endolysin PM-477 was engineered and produced as previously described (26). Briefly, PM-477 was recombinantly expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). Protein purification was performed by affinity chromatography on a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) HisTrap column. The protein was eluted with a mixture of 50 mM MES (morpholineethanesulfonic acid) (Carl Roth) at pH 7, 150 mM NaCl (Carl Roth), and 150 to 500 mM imidazole fractions (2-fold dilutions). Compared to the preparation used in the 2021 study by Landlinger et al. (26), the N-terminal His tag was cleaved off by digestion with 1:100 (wt/wt) 3C protease. The removed tag and the protease were separated from PM-477 by anion-exchange chromatography. The untagged protein was concentrated (if needed) and dialyzed against MES buffer (50 mM MES [pH 5.50], 200 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4) (Sigma-Aldrich).
The protein concentration was determined at the optical density at 260/280 nm (OD260/280) or by using the Pierce bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Purified PM-477 aliquots of 1,000 μL and at a concentration of 0.7 mg/mL were stored at −80°C until the moment of use.
Culture-based assessment of bactericidal activity.
Bacterial suspensions (OD600 of 0.1, corresponding to approximately 107 to 108 CFU/mL) were prepared by scraping the cells from cultures confluently grown on agar plates and diluting them into NYCB plus 10% HS (pH 5.5). Reactions were performed in triplicate by mixing 10 μL of endolysin (200 μg/mL) with 90 μL bacterial suspension in the wells of a 96-well plate. Ten microliters of MES buffer without the endolysin was used as a control. The 96-well reaction plate was incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 5 h. Ten-fold dilution series (10−1 to 10−6) of the cell reaction mixtures were prepared in NYCB plus 10% HS, and 2 μL of each dilution was spotted onto Choc agar plates. After anaerobic incubation at 37°C for 48 h, colonies were counted, CFU/mL were calculated, and the log10 reduction compared to the MES buffer-treated control was determined.
MIC assessment.
The MIC, which is a standard measure of the activity of antimicrobials, was determined according to the 2018 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocol Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria (30). Bacterial suspensions of 105 to 106 CFU/mL in NYCB plus 10% HS were treated with a 2-fold dilution series of either PM-477 or the antibiotic clindamycin (clindamycin hydrochloride) (Sigma-Aldrich), both tested at a starting concentration of 64 μg/mL, or the antibiotic metronidazole (MDZ) (Gatt-Koller) and its hydroxy metabolite 1(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-hydroxy-methyl-5-nitroimidazole (MDZ-OH) (Sigma-Aldrich), starting at concentrations of 2,048 or 512 μg/mL, respectively, or tinidazole (TDZ) (Sigma-Aldrich), starting at 128 μg/mL. Controls for growth in the absence of antimicrobials were also included. OD600 was recorded by a microplate reader (Tecan, Grödig, Austria) after incubation at 37°C for 48 h or, for some fast-growing strains, after incubation for 24 h. Absence of growth was defined as an OD600 of ≤0.14.
Serial passaging for resistance formation profiling.
Bacterial suspensions of 105 to 106 CFU/mL in NYCB plus 10% HS were prepared for the treatment with a 2-fold dilution series of either the endolysin PM-477 produced as described previously (26), PM-477 with modifications defined in this article, metronidazole (MDZ), or 1(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-hydroxy-methyl-5-nitroimidazole (MDZ-OH) (Sigma-Aldrich). The final volume of the reaction was 100 μL, and the reactions were performed in triplicate in 384-well plates. The OD600 was measured using a microplate reader (Tecan, Grödig, Austria) to generate time point 0-h baseline values. The reaction mixtures were incubated anaerobically for 24 h, and then the OD600 was measured again, and the MIC was measured as the lowest concentration with an OD600 of <0.14. The bacterial cell suspension treated with the highest concentration of antimicrobial for which growth was detected (sub-MIC) was diluted to 105 to 106 CFU/mL and treated anew with a dilution series of antimicrobials. This process was repeated for a maximum of 25 rounds. In each round, the input CFU/mL was determined by quantitative plating.
Biofilm formation and MBEC determination.
Gardnerella (see the individual figures for strain specification) was resuspended in brain heart infusion broth supplemented with 2% (wt/vol) gelatin, 0.5% yeast extract (wt/vol), 0.1% starch (wt/vol) and 0.25% glucose (wt/vol) (sBHIG). Passaged strains were resuspended in unbuffered NYCB supplemented with 1% glucose (wt/vol) (sNYCB). The OD600 was set to 0.1 (approximately 107 to 108 CFU/mL), and the cell suspension was diluted 1:10 in growth medium as input for biofilm formation. A total of 200 μL of the respective bacterial suspensions was added to 96-well flat-bottom plates (tissue-culture treated; Sigma-Aldrich). The biofilms were grown under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 40 to 72 h, depending on the isolate. Subsequently, the supernatant was removed, and the biofilm was treated with antimicrobials dissolved in sBHIG (at pH 5 for treatment with PM-477 and unbuffered for treatment with antibiotics) in 100 μL and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for another 24 h. After the treatment, the biofilms were washed twice with 200 μL 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and dissolved by vigorous pipetting (40 times up and down). Serial dilutions of the dissolved cells were spotted onto chocolate agar plates. The plates were incubated anaerobically for 2 to 3 days, and the minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC) of the endolysin or the antibiotics in use were calculated.
Statistical analysis.
Where appropriate, data were log normalized prior to applying statistical tests (e.g., for CFU/mL values and as indicated in the figure legends). When only two groups were compared, the unpaired two-tailed t test was used, as indicated in the respective figure legends. Multiple groups were compared by two-tailed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The software used for statistical analyses was GraphPad Prism8. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant when P was <0.05.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Peebles K, Velloza J, Balkus JE, McClelland RS, Barnabas RV. 2019. High global burden and costs of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sexual Trans Dis 46:304–311. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bautista CT, Wurapa E, Sateren WB, Morris S, Hollingsworth B, Sanchez JL. 2016. Bacterial vaginosis: a synthesis of the literature on etiology, prevalence, risk factors, and relationship with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Mil Med Res 3:4. 10.1186/s40779-016-0074-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kenyon C, Colebunders R, Crucitti T. 2013. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:505–523. 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haahr T, Zacho J, Bräuner M, Shathmigha K, Skov Jensen J, Humaidan P. 2019. Reproductive outcome of patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment and diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis or abnormal vaginal microbiota: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis. BJOG 126:200–207. 10.1111/1471-0528.15178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mania-Pramanik J, Kerkar SC, Salvi VS. 2009. Bacterial vaginosis: a cause of infertility? Int J STD AIDS 20:778–781. 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van Oostrum N, De Sutter P, Meys J, Verstraelen H. 2013. Risks associated with bacterial vaginosis in infertility patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 28:1809–1815. 10.1093/humrep/det096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tabatabaei N, Eren A, Barreiro L, Yotova V, Dumaine A, Allard C, Fraser W. 2019. Vaginal microbiome in early pregnancy and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study. BJOG 126:349–358. 10.1111/1471-0528.15299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leitich H, Kiss H. 2007. Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:375–390. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Unemo M, Bradshaw CS, Hocking JS, de Vries HJC, Francis SC, Mabey D, Marrazzo JM, Sonder GJB, Schwebke JR, Hoornenborg E, Peeling RW, Philip SS, Low N, Fairley CK. 2017. Sexually transmitted infections: challenges ahead. Lancet Infect Dis 17:e235–e279. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30310-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoang T, Toler E, DeLong K, Mafunda NA, Bloom SM, Zierden HC, Moench TR, Coleman JS, Hanes J, Kwon DS, Lai SK, Cone RA, Ensign LM. 2020. The cervicovaginal mucus barrier to HIV-1 is diminished in bacterial vaginosis. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008236. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bilardi JE, Walker S, Temple-Smith M, McNair R, Mooney-Somers J, Bellhouse C, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Bradshaw C. 2013. The burden of bacterial vaginosis: women’s experience of the physical, emotional, sexual and social impact of living with recurrent bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One 8:e74378. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V, Ladhoff A, Swidsinski S, Hale LP, Lochs H. 2005. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 106:1013–1023. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183594.45524.d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Machado A, Cerca N. 2015. Influence of biofilm formation by Gardnerella vaginalis and other anaerobes on bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 212:1856–1861. 10.1093/infdis/jiv338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muzny CA, Taylor CM, Swords WE, Tamhane A, Chattopadhyay D, Cerca N, Schwebke JR. 2019. An updated conceptual model on the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 220:1399–1405. 10.1093/infdis/jiz342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Swidsinski A, Loening-Baucke V, Mendling W, Dörffel Y, Schilling J, Halwani Z, Jiang XF, Verstraelen H, Swidsinski S. 2014. Infection through structured polymicrobial Gardnerella biofilms (StPM-GB). Histol Histopathol 29:567–587. 10.14670/HH-29.10.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Castro J, Alves P, Sousa C, Cereija T, França Â, Jefferson KK, Cerca N. 2015. Using an in-vitro biofilm model to assess the virulence potential of bacterial vaginosis or non-bacterial vaginosis Gardnerella vaginalis isolates. Sci Rep 5:11640. 10.1038/srep11640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Faught BM, Reyes S. 2019. Characterization and treatment of recurrent bacterial vaginosis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 28:1218–1226. 10.1089/jwh.2018.7383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bradshaw CS, Sobel JD. 2016. Current treatment of bacterial vaginosis—limitations and need for innovation. J Infect Dis 214:S14–S20. 10.1093/infdis/jiw159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Johnson S, Louie TJ, Gerding DN, Cornely OA, Chasan-Taber S, Fitts D, Gelone SP, Broom C, Davidson DM, Polymer Alternative for CDI Treatment (PACT) Investigators. 2014. Vancomycin, metronidazole, or tolevamer for Clostridium difficile infection: results from two multinational, randomized, controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 59:345–354. 10.1093/cid/ciu313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ribaldone DG, Astegiano M, Saracco G, Pellicano R. 2017. Amoxycillin and metronidazole therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a 10-year trend in Turin, Italy. Balkan Med J 34:290–291. 10.4274/balkanmedj.2015.1714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sobel JD, Ferris D, Schwebke J, Nyirjesy P, Wiesenfeld HC, Peipert J, Soper D, Ohmit SE, Hillier SL. 2006. Suppressive antibacterial therapy with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1283–1289. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V, Swidsinski S, Dörffel Y, Scholze J, Lochs H, Verstraelen H. 2008. An adherent Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm persists on the vaginal epithelium after standard therapy with oral metronidazole. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:97.e1–97.e6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beigi RH, Austin MN, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. 2004. Antimicrobial resistance associated with the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1124–1129. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Austin MN, Beigi RH, Meyn LA, Hillier SL. 2005. Microbiologic response to treatment of bacterial vaginosis with topical clindamycin or metronidazole. J Clin Microbiol 43:4492–4497. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4492-4497.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schuyler JA, Mordechai E, Adelson ME, Sobel JD, Gygax SE, Hilbert DW. 2016. Identification of intrinsically metronidazole-resistant clades of Gardnerella vaginalis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 84:1–3. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Landlinger C, Tisakova L, Oberbauer V, Schwebs T, Muhammad A, Latka A, Van Simaey L, Vaneechoutte M, Guschin A, Resch G, Swidsinski S, Swidsinski A, Corsini L. 2021. Engineered phage endolysin eliminates gardnerella biofilm without damaging beneficial bacteria in bacterial vaginosis ex vivo. Pathogens 10:54. 10.3390/pathogens10010054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Petrina MAB, Cosentino LA, Rabe LK, Hillier SL. 2017. Susceptibility of bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated bacteria to secnidazole compared to metronidazole, tinidazole and clindamycin. Anaerobe 47:115–119. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fischetti VA. 2010. Bacteriophage endolysins: a novel anti-infective to control Gram-positive pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol 300:357–362. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schuch R, Lee HM, Schneider BC, Sauve KL, Law C, Khan BK, Rotolo JA, Horiuchi Y, Couto DE, Raz A, Fischetti VA, Huang DB, Nowinski RC, Wittekind M. 2014. Combination therapy with lysin CF-301 and antibiotic is superior to antibiotic alone for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced murine bacteremia. J Infect Dis 209:1469–1478. 10.1093/infdis/jit637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carpenter DE, Anderson K, Citron DM, Dzink-Fox JAL, Hackel M, Jenkins SG, Knapp C, Keith L, Schuetz AN, Wexler H. 2018. Standard M11. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria, 9th ed, p 11–19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 31.EUCAST. 2021. EUCAST clinical breakpoints and dosing of antibiotics. Version 11.0. http://www.eucast.org.
- 32.Schwebke JR, Desmond RA. 2007. A randomized trial of the duration of therapy with metronidazole plus or minus azithromycin for treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 44:213–219. 10.1086/509577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stein G, Christensen S, Mummaw N, Soper D. 1993. Placebo-controlled trial of intravaginal clindamycin 2% cream for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Ann Pharmacother 27:1343–1345. 10.1177/106002809302701106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schwebke JR, Morgan FG, Koltun W, Nyirjesy P. 2017. A phase-3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effectiveness and safety of single oral doses of secnidazole 2 g for the treatment of women with bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217:678.e1–678.e9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Hocking J, Garland SM, Morris MB, Moss LM, Horvath LB, Kuzevska I, Fairley CK. 2006. High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. J Infect Dis 193:1478–1486. 10.1086/503780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Alba C, Blanco A, Alarcón T. 2017. Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Curr Opin Infect Dis 30:489–497. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Peng Z, Jin D, Kim HB, Stratton CW, Wu B, Tang Y-W, Sun X. 2017. Update on antimicrobial resistance in Clostridium difficile: resistance mechanisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol 55:1998–2008. 10.1128/JCM.02250-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lee Y, Park YJ, Kim MN, Uh Y, Kim MS, Lee K. 2015. Multicenter study of antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Korea in 2012. Ann Lab Med 35:479–486. 10.3343/alm.2015.35.5.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oliveira H, Melo LDR, Santos SB, Nobrega FL, Ferreira EC, Cerca N, Azeredo J, Kluskens LD. 2013. Molecular aspects and comparative genomics of bacteriophage endolysins. J Virol 87:4558–4570. 10.1128/JVI.03277-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Britz ML, Wilkinson RG. 1979. Isolation and properties of metronidazole-resistant mutants of Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 16:19–27. 10.1128/AAC.16.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sindar P, Britz ML, Wilkinson RG. 1982. Isolation and properties of metronidazole-resistant mutants of Clostridium perfringens. J Med Microbiol 15:503–509. 10.1099/00222615-15-4-503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lynch T, Chong P, Zhang J, Hizon R, Du T, Graham MR, Beniac DR, Booth TF, Kibsey P, Miller M, Gravel D, Mulvey MR, Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP). 2013. Characterization of a stable, metronidazole-resistant Clostridium difficile clinical isolate. PLoS One 8:e53757. 10.1371/journal.pone.0053757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gal M, Brazier JS. 2004. Metronidazole resistance in Bacteroides spp. carrying nim genes and the selection of slow-growing metronidazole-resistant mutants. J Antimicrob Chemother 54:109–116. 10.1093/jac/dkh296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pumbwe L, Wareham DW, Aduse-Opoku J, Brazier JS, Wexler HM. 2007. Genetic analysis of mechanisms of multidrug resistance in a clinical isolate of Bacteroides fragilis. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:183–189. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01620.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pumbwe L, Chang A, Smith RL, Wexler HM. 2007. BmeRABC5 is a multidrug efflux system that can confer metronidazole resistance in Bacteroides fragilis. Microb Drug Resist 13:96–101. 10.1089/mdr.2007.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pumbwe L, Glass D, Wexler HM. 2006. Efflux pump overexpression in multiple-antibiotic-resistant mutants of Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3150–3153. 10.1128/AAC.00141-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Roldán MD, Pérez-Reinado E, Castillo F, Moreno-Vivián C. 2008. Reduction of polynitroaromatic compounds: the bacterial nitroreductases. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:474–500. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hardy L, Jespers V, Dahchour N, Mwambarangwe L, Musengamana V, Vaneechoutte M, Crucitti T. 2015. Unravelling the bacterial vaginosis-associated biofilm: a multiplex Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae fluorescence in situ hybridization assay using peptide nucleic acid probes. PLoS One 10:e0136658-16. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li T, Zhang Z, Wang F, He Y, Zong X, Bai H, Liu Z. 2020. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of metronidazole and clindamycin against Gardnerella vaginalis in planktonic and biofilm formation. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2020:1361825. 10.1155/2020/1361825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Spížek J, Řezanka T. 2004. Lincomycin, clindamycin and their applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:455–464. 10.1007/s00253-003-1545-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Swidsinski A, Doerffel Y, Loening-Baucke V, Swidsinski S, Verstraelen H, Vaneechoutte M, Lemm V, Schilling J, Mendling W. 2010. Gardnerella biofilm involves females and males and is transmitted sexually. Gynecol Obstet Invest 70:256–263. 10.1159/000314015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vaneechoutte M, Guschin A, Van Simaey L, Gansemans Y, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Cools P. 2019. Emended description of Gardnerella vaginalis and description of Gardnerella leopoldii sp. nov., Gardnerella piotii sp. nov. and Gardnerella swidsinskii sp. nov., with delineation of 13 genomic species within the genus Gardnerella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:679–687. 10.1099/ijsem.0.003200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Download aac.02319-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.2 MB (165.5KB, pdf)