ABSTRACT
New drug targets and molecules with bactericidal activity are needed against the respiratory mycobacterial pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus. Employing a lead repurposing strategy, the antituberculosis compound GaMF1 was tested against M. abscessus. Whole-cell and ATP synthesis assays demonstrated that GaMF1 inhibits growth and kills M. abscessus by targeting the F-ATP synthase. GaMF1’s anti-M. abscessus activity increased in combination with clofazimine, rifabutin, or amikacin. The study expands the repertoire of anti-M. abscessus compounds targeting oxidative phosphorylation.
KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium abscessus, nontuberculous mycobacteria, bioenergetics, F-ATP synthase, γ subunit inhibitor, multidrug resistance
INTRODUCTION
The treatment of diseases caused by nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM), including the fast-growing bacterium Mycobacterium abscessus, is problematic because of low permeability of the cell wall, biofilm formation, deficient drug-activating enzymes, numerous enzymes that neutralize drugs or modify their specific targets, naturally occurring polymorphism, and induction of drug efflux pumps (1, 2). Such pumps use either ATP- or proton-motive force-driven energy forms generated by the electron transport chain (ETC), which generates the proton-motive force for condensing ADP plus Pi to form ATP in the process of oxidative phosphorylation by the F1F0-ATP synthase (3). Oxidative phosphorylation is the major process for ATP synthesis in the pathogen, making the enzymes of the ETC and the F1F0-ATP synthase attractive as drug targets, as shown for clofazimine (CFZ), affecting NADH dehydrogenase (NDH-2) of the ETC (4), or the repurposed antituberculosis (TB) drug bedaquiline (BDQ) and its derivative, TBAJ876, targeting M. abscessus’s F1F0 ATP synthase (5–7). However, despite being potent growth inhibitors, these compounds are mostly bacteriostatic against M. abscessus.
The mycobacterial F1F0-ATP synthase consists of its proton translocation F0 sector (a:c9), which is connected by the central, rotating γ:ε and the peripheral stalk subunits b:b′:δ to the catalytic α3:β3 sector, in which ATP is formed (8–10). In contrast to nonmycobacterial F1F0-ATP synthase, the mycobacterial F-ATP synthase subunits α, δ, and γ contain a C-terminal elongation (11), inserted domain (8), or an extra loop of 12 to 14 amino acids (12), respectively. These add-ons are essential for regulation (9–11, 13) or ATP synthesis (11, 12, 14). For example, the mycobacterial extra loop of subunit γ provides a failsafe device (15) by which one of its aspartate residues forms a salt bridge with an arginine residue of the peripheral stalk subunit b′ during rotation, when subunit γ comes into proximity of subunit b′ (15). These novel mycobacterial features of subunits α and γ are targets for specific and novel inhibitors (14, 16). GaMF1, a bactericidal anti-TB compound that targets the extra loop of the M. tuberculosis γ subunit, represents such a novel mycobacterial F-ATP synthase inhibitor, which has a clogP of 4.37 and good metabolic stability in mouse liver microsomes and does not inhibit growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (16).
Here, we have used a repurposing approach for the GaMF1 anti-TB compound (Fig. 1A) and studied M. abscessus’s susceptibility to the compound in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton (CAMH) medium (17, 18) and in complete Middlebrook 7H9 broth (19) using the type strain M. abscessus subsp. abscessus ATCC 19977 as the test organism. GaMF1 displayed potency with a MIC required to inhibit the growth of 50% of M. abscessus (MIC50) of 13 ± 2.1 μM (Fig. 1B) and 33 ± 4.7 μM (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). These values are comparable to the ones determined for GaMF1 in M. tuberculosis (33 μM) and M. bovis Calmette-Guérin (BCG) (17 μM) (16), and are in the range of the clinically used anti-M. abscessus drugs cefoxitin (38 μM [20]), amikacin (55 μM [20]), and imipenem (14 μM [21]). While the F-ATP synthase inhibitors BDQ and TBAJ876 reveal a 100× higher potency against M. tuberculosis than M. abscessus (7), GaMF1 retains similar efficacy in cell growth inhibition and killing over a wide spectrum of mycobacteria.
FIG 1.
GaMF1 susceptibility testing. (A) Structure of GaMF1. (B) Effects of GaMF1 of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus ATCC19977 (M. abscessus) growth when grown on CAMH medium. The experiments were performed in triplicate. (C) Effect of GaMF1 against the clinical isolate M. abscessus Bamboo in CAMH broth. The experiment was performed in triplicate. P < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was carried out for the experiments in panels B to D using one-sample t and Wilcoxon tests (29). (D) Six days of GaMF1 kill kinetics against M. abscessus. The bacteria were grown in liquid culture (CAMH medium) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of GaMF1. The experiments were repeated twice, and the profiles were similar. P < 0.001. Statistical analysis was carried out for the experiment using ordinary one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bartlett’s test.
Next, we determined whether GaMF1 susceptibility is retained against the clinical isolate M. abscessus subsp. abscessus Bamboo (22). The MIC50 determined in CAMH medium and Middlebrook 7H9 broth was 10 ± 1.9 μM (Fig. 1C) and 33 ± 3.2 μM (Fig. S1B), respectively, similar to the values determined for the M. abscessus type strain M. abscessus subsp. abscessus ATCC 19977.
To determine whether GaMF1 is bactericidal against M. abscessus, we measured the survival of the type strain upon drug exposure. GaMF1 was bactericidal against M. abscessus at 10-fold its MIC50 in both CAMH medium (Fig. 1D) and 7H9 (Fig. S1C).
The ability of GaMF1 to inhibit mycobacterial F-ATP synthase was evaluated using an intracellular ATP synthesis assay (23) and inside-out membrane vesicles (IMVs) of M. abscessus (16), which were prepared according to Hotra et al. (16). As displayed in Fig. 2A, compound GaMF1 depleted ATP synthesis within the cell with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10 ± 0.9 μM and depleted NADH-driven ATP synthesis of M. abscessus IMVs with an IC50 of 13 ± 2.5 μM (Fig. 2B), suggesting that growth inhibition of the pathogen is caused by the inhibition of the F-ATP synthase.
FIG 2.
GaMF1 inhibits oxidative phosphorylation. (A) Inhibition of intracellular ATP synthesis of M. abscessus cells by GaMF1. The ATP content of the cells was measured by adding BacTiter-Glo (Promega) to the cells. The total ATP content is directly proportional to number of relative luminescence units (RLU). The experiments were performed in triplicate. (B) Inhibition of ATP synthesis by GaMF1 in M. abscessus IMVs using the electron donor NADH. ATP synthesis by M. abscessus IMVs was measured as luminescence upon addition of CellTiter-Glo (Promega). The experiments were performed in triplicate. P < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was carried out for both experiments in panels A and B using one-sample t and Wilcoxon tests (29).
Since treatment of M. abscessus infections requires drug combinations, we measured the growth inhibition activity of GaMF1 combined with CFZ, proposed to compete with the mycobacterial specific electron acceptor menaquinone for its reduction by the NDH-2 complex (23). CFZ has been recently shown to be active against M. abscessus and is used clinically as a repurposed drug (23–26). As revealed in Fig. 3, the combination of 3 μM CFZ or 6.8 μM (MIC50 of CFZ [25]) with GaMF1 increased the potency of M. abscessus cell inhibition in 7H9 medium (Fig. 3A). When GaMF1 was combined with M. abscessus’s RNA polymerase inhibitor rifabutin (MIC of 1 to 4 μM) (Fig. 3B) or the anti-M. abscessus antibiotic amikacin (5 μM) (Fig. 3C) (27), a drastic reduction of cell growth was observed.
FIG 3.
Increased potency of GaMF1 in combination with the antibiotics CFZ, rifabutin, and amikacin in 7H9 medium. (A) M. abscessus growth inhibition by GaMF1 (green circle) in combination with 3.4 μM (inverted triangle), 6.8 μM (open square), or 27.2 μM (open circle) CFZ. (B) GaMF1 (green circle) susceptibility of M. abscessus in combination with 1 μM (red square) or 4.2 μM (red triangle) rifabutin. (C) Amikacin (5 μM [black square]) increases the potency of GaMF1 growth inhibition of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus. P < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was carried out using two-way ANOVA for all the experiments presented.
Considering the increased anti-M. abscessus activity in the GaMF1-rifabutin combination and rifabutin’s bactericidal activity (27, 28), the combinatory GaMF1-rifabution effect in M. abscessus killing was shown to be only marginal (Fig. 4).
FIG 4.
GaMF1 and rifabutin killing potency. Initial six days of GaMF1 and GaMF1 plus rifabutin kill kinetics against M. abscessus subsp. abscessus growth. The bacteria were grown in liquid culture (7H9) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of GaMF1 and rifabutin. The experiments were repeated twice, and the profiles were similar. P < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was carried out for the experiment using ordinary one-way ANOVA with Bartlett’s test.
In conclusion, this study has shown that GaMF1 is active in cell growth inhibition and killing of M. abscessus, similar to the compound’s activity against M. tuberculosis. The identification of GaMF1 as a novel M. abscessus inhibitor expands the poorly populated compound pipeline against this difficult-to-cure opportunistic NTM pathogen. By targeting M. abscessus’s F-ATP synthase, GaMF1 depletes cellular ATP, essential for cell wall formation, replication, ana- and catabolic processes, and ATP-dependent efflux pumps. Inhibition of the latter could impede drug flux, which has emerged as an important determinant of drug resistance of BDQ and CFZ (25) in M. abscessus. Finally, M. abscessus revealed an increased susceptibility of GaMF1 in combination with CFZ, rifabutin, or amikacin, which is a prerequisite for combinatory approaches to treat M. abscessus infections.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore, NRF Competitive Research Program (CRP), grant award number NRF–CRP18–2017–01.
Conceptualization: G.G. Investigation: P.R. Writing—original draft: P.R. and G.G. Writing—review and editing: P.R., T.D., and G.G. Funding acquisition: T.D. and G.G. Supervision: G.G.
G.G. and P.R. are inventors on Singapore (SG) “Provisional” Patent 10202112053Y, Discovery of a F-ATP synthase inhibitor for the treatment Of Mycobacterium abscessus diseases filed on 29th October 2021, related to the inhibitor described in this article.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Johansen MD, Herrmann J-L, Kremer L. 2020. Non-tuberculosis mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:392–407. 10.1038/s41579-020-0331-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu M-L, Aziz DB, Dartois V, Dick T. 2018. NTM drug discovery: status, gaps and the way forward. Drug Discov Today 23:1502–1519. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lu P, Lill H, Bald D. 2014. ATP synthase in mycobacteria: special features and implications for a function as drug target. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837:1208–1218. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yano T, Kassovska-Bratinova S, Teh JS, Winkler J, Sullivan K, Isaacs A, Schechter NM, Rubin H. 2011. Reduction of clofazimine by mycobacterial type 2 NADH:quinone oxidoreductase: a pathway for the generation of bactericidal levels of reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem 286:10276–10287. 10.1074/jbc.M110.200501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Philley JV, Wallace RJ, Jr, Benwill JL, Taskar V, Brown-Elliott BA, Thakkar F, Aksamit TR, Griffith DE. 2015. Preliminary results of bedaquiline as salvage therapy for patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Chest 148:499–506. 10.1378/chest.14-2764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dupont C, Viljoen A, Thomas S, Roquet-Banères F, Herrmann JL, Pethe K, Kremer L. 2017. Bedaquiline inhibits the ATP synthase in Mycobacterium abscessus and is effective in infected zebrafish. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01225-17. 10.1128/AAC.01225-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sarathy JP, Ganapathy US, Zimmerman MD, Dartois V, Gengenbacher M, Dick T. 2020. TBAJ-876, a 3,5-dialkoxypyridine analogue of bedaquiline, is active against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e02404-19. 10.1128/AAC.02404-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kamariah N, Huber RG, Nartey W, Bhushan S, Bond PJ, Grüber G. 2019. Structure and subunit arrangement of Mycobacterial F1F0 ATP synthase and novel features of the unique mycobacterial subunit δ. J Struct Biol 207:199–208. 10.1016/j.jsb.2019.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kamariah N, Ragunathan P, Shin J, Saw WG, Wong CF, Dick T, Grüber G. 2020. Unique structural and mechanistic properties of mycobacterial F-ATP synthases: implications for drug design. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 152:64–73. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guo H, Courbon GM, Bueler SA, Mai J, Liu J, Rubinstein JL. 2021. Structure of mycobacterial ATP synthase bound to the tuberculosis drug bedaquiline. Nature 589:143–147. 10.1038/s41586-020-3004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ragunathan P, Sielaff H, Sundararaman L, Biuković G, Manimekalai MSS, Singh D, Kundu S, Wohland T, Frasch W, Dick T, Grüber G. 2017. The uniqueness of subunit α of mycobacterial F-ATP synthases: an evolutionary variant for niche adaptation. J Biol Chem 292:11262–11279. 10.1074/jbc.M117.784959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hotra A, Suter M, Biuković G, Ragunathan P, Kundu S, Dick T, Grüber G. 2016. Deletion of a unique loop in the mycobacterial F-ATP synthase γ subunit sheds light on its inhibitory role in ATP hydrolysis-driven H+ pumping. FEBS J 283:1947–1961. 10.1111/febs.13715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wong C-F, Grüber G. 2020. The unique C-terminal extension of mycobacterial F-ATP synthase subunit α is the major contributor to its latent ATP hydrolysis activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01568-20. 10.1128/AAC.01568-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harikishore A, Wong CF, Ragunathan P, Litty D, Müller V, Grüber G. 2021. Targeting mycobacterial F-ATP synthase C-terminal α subunit interaction motif on rotary subunit γ. Antibiotics 10:1456. 10.3390/antibiotics10121456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Montgomerya MG, Petria J, Spikesa TE, Walker JE. 2021. Structure of the ATP synthase from Mycobacterium smegmatis provides targets for treating tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2111899118. 10.1073/pnas.2111899118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hotra A, Ragunathan P, Ng PS, Seankongsuk P, Harikishore A, Sarathy JP, Saw WG, Lakshmanan U, Sae-Lao P, Kalia NP, Shin J, Kalyanasundaram R, Anbarasu S, Parthasarathy K, Pradeep CN, Makhija H, Droge P, Poulsen A, Tan JHL, Pethe K, Dick T, Bates RW, Grüber G. 2020. Discovery of a novel mycobacterial F-ATP synthase inhibitor and its potency in combination with diarylquinolines. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 59:13295–13304. 10.1002/anie.202002546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pang H, Li G, Wan L, Jiang Y, Liu H, Zhao X, Zhao Z, Wan K. 2015. In vitro drug susceptibility of 40 international reference rapidly growing mycobacteria to 20 antimicrobial agents. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:15423–15431. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Low JL, Wu ML, Aziz DB, Laleu B, Dick T. 2017. Screening of TB actives for activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria delivers high hit rates. Front Microbiol 8:1539. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Broda A, Jebbari H, Beaton K, Mitchell S, Drobniewski F. 2013. Comparative drug resistance of Mycobacterium abscessus and M. chelonae isolates from patients with and without cystic fibrosis in the United Kingdom. J Clin Microbiol 51:217–223. 10.1128/JCM.02260-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ferro BE, Srivastava S, Deshpande D, Pasipanodya JG, van Soolingen D, Mouton JW, van Ingen J, Gumbo T. 2016. Failure of the amikacin, cefoxitin, and clarithromycin combination regimen for treating pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6374–6376. 10.1128/AAC.00990-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brown-Elliott BA, Killingley J, Vasireddy S, Bridge L, Wallace RJ, Jr. 2016. In vitro comparison of ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem against isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria and Nocardia by use of broth microdilution and Etest. J Clin Microbiol 54:1586–1592. 10.1128/JCM.00298-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yee M, Klinzing D, Wei J-R, Gengenbacher M, Rubin EJ, Dick T. 2017. Draft genome sequence of Mycobacterium abscessus Bamboo. Genome Announc 5:e00388-17. 10.1128/genomeA.00388-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lechartier B, Cole ST. 2015. Mode of action of clofazimine and combination therapy with benzothiazinones against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4457–4463. 10.1128/AAC.00395-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen Y, Chen J, Zhang S, Shi W, Zhang W, Zhu M, Zhang Y. 2018. Novel mutations associated with clofazimine resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00544-18. 10.1128/AAC.00544-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ferro BE, Meletiadis J, Wattenberg M, de Jong A, van Soolingen D, Mouton JW, van Ingen J. 2016. Clofazimine prevents the regrowth of Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium type strains exposed to amikacin and clarithromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1097–1105. 10.1128/AAC.02615-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Richard M, Gutiérrez AV, Viljoen A, Rodriguez-Rincon D, Roquet-Baneres F, Blaise M, Everall I, Parkhill J, Floto RA, Kremer L. 2019. Mutations in the MAB_2299c TetR regulator confer cross-resistance to clofazimine and bedaquiline in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01316-18. 10.1128/AAC.01316-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aziz DB, Low JL, Wu ML, Gengenbacher M, Teo JWP, Dartois V, Dick T. 2017. Rifabutin is active against Mycobacterium abscessus complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00155-17. 10.1128/AAC.00155-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Johansen MD, Daher W, Roquet-Baneres F, Raynaud C, Alcaraz M, Maurer FP, Kremer L. 2020. Rifabutin is bactericidal against intracellular and extracellular forms of Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00363-20. 10.1128/AAC.00363-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Motulsky H, Christopoulos A. 2003. Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression: a practical guide to curve fitting. GraphPad software, Inc, San Diego, CA. www.graphpad.com. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1. Download aac.00018-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.2 MB (209.8KB, pdf)




