Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2022 Apr 25;66(5):e00251-22. doi: 10.1128/aac.00251-22

A Single Amino Acid Substitution in Elongation Factor G Can Confer Low-Level Gentamicin Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Concerta L Holley a, Vijaya Dhulipala a, Jacqueline T Balthazar a, Adriana Le Van b, Afrin A Begum b, Shao-Chun Chen c,d, Timothy D Read e,f, Mitch Matoga g, Irving F Hoffman h, Daniel Golparian i, Magnus Unemo i,j, Ann E Jerse b, William M Shafer a,f,k,
PMCID: PMC9112995  PMID: 35465683

ABSTRACT

The continued emergence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates which are resistant to first-line antibiotics has reinvigorated interest in alternative therapies such as expanded use of gentamicin (Gen). We hypothesized that expanded use of Gen promotes emergence of gonococci with clinical resistance to this aminoglycoside. To understand how decreased susceptibility of gonococci to Gen might develop, we selected spontaneous low-level Gen-resistant (GenR) mutants (Gen MIC = 32 μg/mL) of the Gen-susceptible strain FA19. Consequently, we identified a novel missense mutation in fusA, which encodes elongation factor G (EF-G), causing an alanine (A) to valine (V) substitution at amino acid position 563 in domain IV of EF-G; the mutant allele was termed fusA2. Transformation analysis showed that fusA2 could increase the Gen MIC by 4-fold. While possession of fusA2 did not impair either in vitro gonococcal growth or protein synthesis, it did result in a fitness defect during experimental infection of the lower genital tract in female mice. Through bioinformatic analysis of whole-genome sequences of 10,634 international gonococcal clinical isolates, other fusA alleles were frequently detected, but genetic studies revealed that they could not decrease Gen susceptibility in a similar manner to fusA2. In contrast to these diverse international fusA alleles, the fusA2-encoded A563V substitution was detected in only a single gonococcal clinical isolate. We hypothesize that the rare occurrence of fusA2 in N. gonorrhoeae clinical isolates is likely due to a fitness cost during infection, but compensatory mutations which alleviate this fitness cost could emerge and promote GenR in global strains.

KEYWORDS: Neisseria gonorrhoeae, gentamicin, resistance, fusA, spontaneous mutant

INTRODUCTION

Gonorrhea is the second most commonly reported bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the United States (1), and there are an estimated 87 million gonorrhea cases among adults globally per year (2). For over 80 years, antibiotic therapies have been the mainstay of curing gonorrheal infections and reducing the spread of infection in the community. However, one consistent pattern during this period has been the continued emergence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) strains which express clinical resistance to all introduced antibiotics (3), and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates have been reported globally (46). For these reasons, Ng is considered an urgent health threat pathogen by both the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (79). Ceftriaxone (Cro), used in combination with azithromycin (Azm) (1013) or in high-dose monotherapy (1417), is the final drug for empirical first-line treatment of gonorrhea.

The emergence of MDR Ng clinical isolates has prompted the development and clinical testing of new antibiotics, the use of molecular diagnostics to identify isolates susceptible to previously used antibiotics (e.g., ciprofloxacin), and the use of existing antibiotics in new gonorrheal treatment regimens (6, 18, 19). With respect to existing antibiotics which have been used to treat other bacterial infections, gentamicin (Gen) is known to have anti-gonococcal action and has been used in many countries when recommended first-line gonorrheal therapy fails (6) and in Malawi as front-line empirical gonorrheal therapy, i.e., in combination with doxycycline (20, 21). However, there are currently no interpretative criteria for Gen MICs set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) or the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). MICs of ≥32 μg/mL have been used by the World Health Organization and in Malawi as the Gen resistance breakpoint for gonococci. In Malawi, Gen has been routinely used to treat suspected gonococcal infections for over 25 years, and isolates have mainly been uniformly susceptible to Gen in vitro (20); Gen treatment failures have been verified, likely due to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic reasons (21). Similarly, a study of 1,366 gonococcal isolates from 17 European countries showed that most isolates were Gen-susceptible (22). In China, gonococcal isolates have also demonstrated full Gen susceptibility (23). Of note, a recent Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) study suggested that Gen susceptibility might be decreasing even though all isolates included in the study were considered susceptible, with MICs of ≤8 μg/mL (24).

If Gen use becomes more prevalent in the USA and elsewhere for gonorrhea treatment, it is critical to understand how Ng might develop clinical resistance. In this respect, high-level (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL) aminoglycoside resistance in other bacteria can be due to rRNA modifications based on nucleoside changes or to the action of RNA methylases that impair antibiotic binding (25, 26). Additionally, a lower level of aminoglycoside resistance, which may have clinical significance for efficacious treatment of infections, can be mediated by multidrug efflux pumps, mutations that impact membrane integrity or homeostasis, or mutations within the fusA gene, which encodes elongation factor G (EF-G) (2733). To date, clinical Ng isolates expressing either level of Gen resistance (GenR) have not been reported. With respect to the possibility of low-level GenR development, most Ng isolates remain highly susceptible (MICs of <16 μg/mL), but a small percentage (2%) of USA isolates have a reduced susceptibility (MICs of 16 μg/mL) (24). In this study, we sought to examine how low-level GenR may develop in vitro and report that a single amino acid substitution in EF-G can confer low-level GenR.

RESULTS

Identification of a fusA mutation associated with low-level GenR in Ng.

A recent study suggested that the use of Gen for gonococcal infections would likely lead to emergence of resistance, although the potential mechanisms for this were not discussed (34). To understand how low-level GenR may arise, in two separate experiments, we selected and screened (see Materials and Methods) for spontaneous mutants of the Gen-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 (Gen MIC = 8 μg/mL) which could grow on gonococcal base (GCB) agar containing 1× Gen MIC; these colonies arose at frequencies ranging from 1.5 × 10−8 to 5.2 × 10−7. Randomly-picked colonies from the selective agar were reanalyzed for levels of susceptibility to Gen and other antibiotics, including aminoglycosides, using an agar dilution assay. From this analysis, we identified a clone that expressed a 4-fold decrease in Gen susceptibility (MIC = 32 μg/mL) (Table 1) compared to the parental strain FA19. Additionally, compared to FA19, this spontaneous mutant also exhibited a 4-fold decrease in susceptibility to tobramycin (Tob) and a 2-fold decrease in susceptibility to kanamycin (Kan), but was equally susceptible to erythromycin (Ery), polymyxin B (Pmb), spectinomycin (Spt), and streptomycin (Str) (Table 1). Because the MIC of Gen against this mutant was at the previously suggested breakpoint (20, 21), this phenotype was termed low-level GenR.

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of the parent strains and GenR mutantsa

Strain Antimicrobial class MICs (μg/mL)
Aminoglycosides
Aminocyclitol Macrolides
Cationic peptide
Gen Tob Kan Str Spt Ery Azm Pmb
FA19 8 8 32 16 32 0.25 0.125 100
FA19 GenR 32 32 64 16 32 0.25 0.125 100
FA19 fusA2 32 16 64 16 32 0.25 0.125 100
WHO X 16 8 32 16 32 2 1 400
WHO X fusA2 32 16 64 16 32 2 1 400
a

All MIC values are representative results from 3 to 5 independent determinations. Gen, gentamicin; Tob, tobramycin; Kan, kanamycin; Str, streptomycin; Ery, erythromycin; Azm, azithromycin; Spt, spectinomycin; Pmb, polymyxin B.

In order to determine the potential mechanism(s) for the GenR phenotype of the spontaneous mutant, we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) using genomic DNA from FA19 and the spontaneous mutant. Comparative bioinformatic analysis revealed a total of 41 nonsynonymous single nucleotide mutations (SNPs) and 1 indel in intragenic sequences of the mutant (Table S1 in the supplemental material). Interestingly, one missense mutation (A563V) was identified in the protein-coding sequence of fusA, which encodes elongation factor G (EF-G). We termed this fusA allele fusA2.

The fusA2 allele was of interest because earlier work showed that mutations in E. coli fusA could decrease bacterial susceptibility to Gen and other aminoglycosides (26). The missense mutation in fusA2 would cause an alanine (A) to valine (V) change at amino acid position 563 (A563V) in the gonococcal EF-G protein. The Ng fusA gene resides within the ribosomal gene cluster which contains the essential rpsG and rpsL genes (35). Ng EF-G is a 701-amino acid protein with a predicted weight of 77.18 kDa and an isoelectric point of 4.99. Ng EF-G has 74.25% homology to the E. coli EF-G amino acid sequence, with a classical elongation factor protein structure consisting of five domains: globular I, II, III, IV, and V (Fig. 1). In E. coli, the globular I domain interacts directly with domains II and V and binds to the ribosome. Domain III is likely involved in the activation of GTP hydrolysis, while domain IV is critical for translocation. Domain IV, wherein A563 resides, protrudes from the molecule, and its movement toward the A site of the 30S ribosomal subunit helps promote the translocation of peptidyl tRNA from the A to the P site (36). Notably, A563 is conserved across EF-G homologs in E. coli, N. meningitidis, and P. aeruginosa (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), suggesting that it may have an important role in EF-G protein function.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

The predicted structure of the gonococcal elongation factor G (EF-G) protein. Three-dimensional ribbon structure of fusA-encoded EF-G protein from FA19. Protein was predicted by I-TASSER (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/) using the predicted amino acid sequence (WP_003690097.1) and visualized by Chimera (https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera). EF-G domains were predicted using the Pfam database (https://pfam.xfam.org/) and are indicated in purple. Locations of key amino acids included in this study are labeled in black.

Genetic linkage of fusA2 to low-level GenR.

To confirm that the A563V mutation encoded by fusA2 could confer low-level GenR, we amplified the fusA2 allele from the spontaneous FA19 GenR mutant and cloned it into pBad-Topo. We used this plasmid to transform parent strain FA19 for increased Gen resistance; because pBAD does not replicate in Ng, the wild-type (WT) chromosomal fusA gene would be replaced by fusA2 by allelic exchange. GenR transformants were obtained, and the representative colonies mostly phenocopied the antibiotic susceptibility profile of the spontaneous mutant in that the fusA2 transformant displayed a 4-fold increase in Gen resistance, but only a 2-fold increase in Tob resistance; the MIC values for antibiotics against the representative transformant are shown in Table 1. The presence of the single missense mutation at fusA codon 563 in the representative transformant was confirmed by DNA sequencing of a PCR product which encompassed the entire gene (data not shown). We recognize that it is possible that mutations outside fusA are required to achieve the level of Tob resistance observed in the spontaneous GenR mutant.

In order to determine if possession of fusA2 in a MDR Ng strain would also cause low-level GenR, we used strain WHO X (previously termed H041 [37]) in transformation experiments; the Gen MIC against WHO X was 16 μg/mL. Using pBad-fusA2 as the donor DNA, we obtained WHO X transformants which had a 2-fold increase in the Gen MIC compared to that of the parental strain (Table 1). The WGS of a representative WHO X transformant confirmed the presence of fusA2 and this was designated WHO X fusA2 (Table S2). We noted that WHO X and WHO X fusA2 also differed by a single SNP in one of four rRNA-coding genes, but this SNP was not apparent in the WGS obtained for FA19 and its spontaneous mutant, suggesting that it is not required for the low-level GenR phenotype linked to fusA2. Further, a comparison of intra- and intergenic SNPs and indels of the FA19 fusA2 and WHO X fusA2 strains revealed that only the fusA SNP (A563V mutation) was common. Thus, based on the collective genetic and DNA sequencing results, we concluded that the presence of the A563V substitution in EF-G was the reason for the low-level GenR phenotype in fusA2-bearing Ng.

fusA2 does not impact gonococcal growth or protein synthesis.

Possession of fusA2 did not impact the growth rate of gonococci in GCB broth (Fig. S2A). To assess whether fusA2 influences the fidelity of protein synthesis, we assessed [3H]l-leucine incorporation during growth of FA19 and FA19 fusA2 in GCB broth. As is shown in Fig. S2B, strains FA19 and FA19 fusA2 did not differ in [3H]l-leucine incorporation, suggesting that possession of fusA2 does not significantly impact protein synthesis, which is consistent with the absence of a growth defect. We also considered the possibility that, in the presence of Gen, protein synthesis inhibition would be impacted by fusA2. To test this possibility, we examined radiolabeled l-leucine incorporation by strains FA19 and FA19 fusA2 in the presence of 0.25× or 1× the Gen strain MIC. We found that, in the presence of Gen, there was no significant difference in l-leucine incorporation between the fusA WT and fusA2 isogenic strains (Fig. S2B).

fusA alleles in international gonococcal isolates.

Given that genetic studies linked the GenR phenotype of the FA19 and WHO X transformant strains to fusA2, we sought to determine if this allele is present in international Ng clinical isolates. In this respect, an initial investigation was performed on 58 clinical isolates which were part of an earlier study that tested the phylogenetic relationships of isolates bearing antibiotic-resistance determinants (38). Although the fusA sequence was highly conserved (>99% identity to the FA1090 sequence), we found 2 missense mutations (A305P/T, V651F) and 1 nonsense mutation (insertion after K683) that would lead to early translational termination in this cohort of isolates, which would result in an EF-G protein of 691 amino acids. Based on this initial analysis, we expanded the search for fusA2 to 654 publicly available genomes in the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/864). This analysis found 2 additional missense fusA mutations in clinical isolates (G91R and R602H), but did not identify the A563V mutation. Given that our initial meta-analysis did not identify the fusA2-encoded mutation (A563V) in EF-G, we expanded our analysis to include all the gonococcal genomes present in the PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/neisseria-spp) (39). Analysis of the 10,561 genomes contained in the database identified 51 additional missense mutations and 1 nonsense mutation that spanned the entirety of EF-G; a full list of these mutations and their continents of origin is presented in Table S3. Interestingly, we were able to identify the fusA2-encoded A563V mutation in one strain isolated from a patient in Saudi Arabia (isolate no. 989000093). In addition to this large collection of international N. gonorrhoeae isolates, we also performed DNA sequencing on a complete fusA PCR product of gDNA using the oligonucleotide primers FusA2 and FusA3 (Table S4) from 359 clinical isolates from China which were obtained in 2016; however, none of these were found to contain the fusA2 allele. Lastly, bioinformatic analysis of WGS from 73 gonococcal isolates obtained from Malawi, where Gen is used in combination with doxycycline as a front-line empirical therapy for gonorrhea, did not reveal the presence of the EF-G A563V variant.

To test whether the previously-described fusA mutations could impart GenR in a similar manner to the fusA2-encoded A563V substitution, we performed site-directed mutagenesis on the FA19 fusA WT gene to introduce selected mutations (A244V, A305T, G564D, R602H, and V651F) which span EF-G into strain FA19 by transformation. For this purpose, we used pCR4 plasmid constructs in transformation experiments with selection using Gen at 12 μg/mL. We found that, of the plasmid constructs, only those encoding the EF-G G564D and V651F amino acid substitutions could transform FA19 for decreased Gen susceptibility (Table 2); DNA-sequencing of fusA gene PCR products in these transformants confirmed the presence of the individual mutation (data not shown). However, the Gen MIC of these transformants was only 16 μg/mL. Interestingly, rare colonies which appeared on selective agar in transformation experiments using plasmids bearing the A244V, A305T, or R602H mutations were subsequently found by DNA sequencing of PCR products to possess the fusA2-encoded A563V mutation (data not shown). (The occurrence of these spontaneous fusA2 mutants emphasizes the relative ease with which fusA2 can arise under laboratory conditions). To specifically construct transformants of FA19 with these fusA mutations, we transformed FA19 with dual plasmids: one with the rpsL allele which encodes Str resistance (StrR), and the other with a single site-directed fusA mutation (A244V, A305T, or R602H). We reasoned that, by congression (i.e., the simultaneous entry of two DNA molecules into a single recipient), a percentage of StrR transformants would also have the fusA mutation at the WT chromosomal site. Using this strategy, we were able to identify StrR transformants which also contained the desired fusA mutation, which was determined by DNA sequencing of PCR products which spanned fusA. Critically, unlike the fusA2-encoded A563V amino change, none of the site-directed mutations at codons A244, A305, and R602 could decrease Gen susceptibility in the host strain FA19 (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

fusA mutations in gonococci and susceptibility to antimicrobialsa

Predicted domain fusA mutation Antimicrobial class MICs (μg/mL)
Aminoglycoside
Macrolide Cationic peptide Fusidane
Gen Tob Azm Pmb FA
WT 8 8 0.25 100 0.0625
G/G’ A244V 8 8 0.25 100 0.0625
II A305T 8 8 0.25 100 0.125
IV A563V 32 16 0.25 100 0.0625
G564D 16 16 0.25 100 0.0625
R602H 8 8 0.25 100 0.0625
V V651F 16 16 0.25 100 0.125
a

All MIC values are representative results from at least 5 independent determinations. Gen, gentamicin; WT, wild-type; Tob, tobramycin; Azm, azithromycin; Pmb, polymixin B; FA, fusidic acid; G/G’, common name for Domain I which hydrolyzes GTP.

Possession of fusA2 imposes a fitness cost during experimental competitive infection of female mice.

The infrequent occurrence of the fusA2-encoded A563V mutation in international clinical isolates may suggest that strains bearing this mutation are at a competitive disadvantage in the community due to a fitness cost during infection. To test this hypothesis, we conducted competitive infections in a female mouse model of Ng lower genital tract infection which we have used extensively to ascertain the fitness costs imposed by mutations which influence gonococcal virulence (40, 41). In duplicate experiments, we vaginally inoculated female BALB/c mice with a mixture containing similar numbers of FA19 rpsL and FA19 rpsL fusA2 CFU; analysis of their growth during coculture in GCB broth revealed that neither strain had a competitive advantage at any growth phase (see insert in Fig. 2). Vaginal swabs were cultured on days 1, 3, and 5 postinfection and plated onto GCB agar with or without Gen at 8 μg/mL to allow distinction of the two strains. As shown in Fig. 2, FA19 rpsL significantly outcompeted FA19 rpsL fusA2 over the course of the infection, suggesting that possession of fusA2 imposed a fitness cost.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

The fusA2 mutant is attenuated relative to the parent strain during experimental genital tract infection in female mice. Estradiol-treated, female BALB/c mice were vaginally inoculated with a mixed suspension containing similar numbers of wild-type strain FA19 rpsL or FA19 rpsL fusA2. Vaginal swabs were quantitatively cultured on selective media to determine CFU counts for the parent strain and fusA2 on days 1, 3, and 5 of infection, as described in Materials and Methods. The competitive index (CI) [fusA2 CFU/parent CFU (output) divided by fusA2 CFU/parent CFU (input)] was determined, and the log10 CI was plotted for each mouse. The fusA2 strain showed a 50- to 100,000-fold decrease in fitness relative to the parent strain, with attenuation being greater on day 5 compared to day 1 (P < 0.04). Results are combined data from two experiments (n = 8 mice/experiment); open circles indicate that only the wild-type strain was recovered from vaginal swabs at the indicated time point. Horizontal bars represent the geometric means of the CI values. Results from three independent in vitro competition experiments in which FA19 rpsL and FA19 rpsL, fusA2 were cocultured in supplemented GC broth are shown in the insert, with growth monitored by optical density. Dilutions of the mixed culture were plated onto gonococcal base (GCB) agar with streptomycin (Str, 100 μg/mL), with or without 8 μg/mL of gentamicin (Gen) to distinguish the two strains based on growth of only the fusA2-bearing strain on GCB agar + Gen and Str. No fitness differences were found during the early log (2 h), mid-log (4 h), or stationary (6 h) phases of growth (geometric mean CI = 1.2, 0.95, and 0.8 at each time point, respectively).

DISCUSSION

As gonorrheal treatment options have continued to dwindle due to the resistance of Ng to current and past front-line antibiotics, the use of Gen to treat gonorrheal infections may become more prevalent. This study was undertaken to identify potential resistance determinants which could arise. Presently, the prevalence of Gen susceptibility depends largely on the region of study. In Malawi, China, Europe, and the U.S., Ng isolates showed universal susceptibility to Gen (MICs of ≤8 μg/mL) (2124, 42). In contrast, intermediate or reduced susceptibility to Gen has been seen in Jamaica, India, South Africa, and Côte d’Ivoire (4346). In relation to the significance of our study, both the South Africa and Côte d’Ivoire studies reported strains for which the Gen MIC values were as high as 32 μg/mL (45, 46).

Our finding of low-level Gen resistance in gonococci through a single amino acid substitution at position 563 in EF-G in a highly antimicrobial-susceptible strain (FA19) and a well-studied MDR-resistant strain (WHO X) demonstrates that Ng has the capacity to spontaneously develop low-level Gen resistance (MIC = 32 μg/mL) which may be of clinical significance. Although EF-G is an essential component of translational machinery, nonlethal mutations within the coding gene fusA have been reported as mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance in other bacteria; consistent with the essential nature of EF-G, we have been unable to construct a fusA null mutant in the Ng strain FA19 (data not shown). For instance, an evolutionary study of KanR demonstrated that increasing levels of resistance in E. coli began with a single point mutation in fusA (32). Additionally, both P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii evolved fusA mutations after repeated exposure to Tob (31). In that study, it was noted that at least one fusA mutation was found in every Tob-treated lineage. At present, we do not understand the mechanism by which the A563V substitution in gonococcal EF-G confers low-level aminoglycoside resistance in gonococci. Although it is located in domain IV, which promotes the translocation of peptidyl tRNA from the A to the P site in ribosomes (36), the mutation studied herein does not detectably impact gonococcal protein synthesis or Gen inhibition of protein synthesis compared to the fusA WT gene. Other groups have proposed that mutations which change EF-G structure may prevent or loosen binding of aminoglycosides to helices H44 or H69, which would lower drug affinity for the ribosome, increasing the MIC (33). Mutations in domains IV and V may dynamically alter the functionality of the protein. Alternatively, it may be that fusA2 has secondary effects on the expression of other intrinsic aminoglycoside resistance systems, and this will be the subject of future investigations.

It is noteworthy that the fusA2-associated A563V mutation is exceedingly rare in international gonococcal isolates. While the mutation does not cause an in vitro growth defect in laboratory media, it does impose a significant fitness cost during experimental competitive infection of the lower genital tract in female mice (Fig. 2). This fitness cost may explain why this allele is rarely seen in international clinical isolates (Table S3); the mechanism by which it causes this fitness cost in female mice is unclear and the subject of ongoing studies. However, we stress that if Gen usage for treating gonorrheal infection becomes more prominent worldwide, compensatory mutations which relieve the fitness cost without changing GenR may develop, allowing the proliferation of fusA2-bearing strains in communities. Furthermore, based on our studies and those of others (2124, 4246), it will also become critical to include Gen in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing so that Ng isolates with decreased susceptibility to this aminoglycoside can be identified and studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers.

Ng strains FA19 and WHO X and their isogenic genetic derivative strains, along with the plasmids used and their E. coli hosts, are listed in Table S5. The oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in Table S4. E. coli strains were routinely cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar or in LB broth (Difco, Sparks, MD) containing 50 μg/mL Kan, 100 μg/mL ampicillin, or 100 μg/mL chloramphenicol as necessary. Gonococci were grown on gonococcal base agar (Difco, Sparks, MD) containing Kellogg’s supplements I and II at 37°C under 5.0% (vol/vol) CO2 (47). Liquid cultures of gonococci for growth assays were begun by inoculating plate-grown cells in pre-warmed GCB broth containing Kellogg’s supplements I and II and 0.043% (wt/vol) sodium bicarbonate and growing them in a 37°C water bath with shaking.

MIC determination.

The MICs of antimicrobials were determined by the agar dilution method (48). Antimicrobials were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C under 5.0% (vol/vol) CO2-enriched atmosphere before being photographed for data storage purposes.

Isolation of spontaneous GenR mutants.

Spontaneous GenR mutants were isolated as in a previous study (49), with modifications. Briefly, FA19 was exposed to sublethal Gen concentrations (0.2 μg/mL) on GCB agar containing Kellogg’s supplements I and II at 37°C under 5.0% (vol/vol) CO2 overnight. The biomass was collected and spread on GCB plus Gen at 4 μg/mL (0.5 × MIC). Colonies from multiple GCB + Gen agar plates were replica-plated onto GCB agar plates containing Gen at 8 μg/mL. Gen MICs of identified spontaneous GenR mutants were subsequently determined as described above.

Construction of FA19 fusA2 and FA19 rpsL fusA2.

The fusA gene was amplified using the primer pair FusA1/FusA2 from the GenR mutant and subcloned into pBad to create plasmid pBad-fusA2 GentR. This plasmid was used to transform wild-type FA19, and transformants were selected on GCB agar containing Gen at 16 μg/mL. To give the strains StrR, the rpsL allele from the previously described FA19 rpsL (50) was cloned into pBad and used to transform the FA19 fusA2 and its parent FA19. rpsL transformants were grown on GCB agar containing Str at 200 μg/mL. Strains were confirmed by Sanger sequencing of PCR-amplified fusA and rpsL gene products.

Whole-genome sequencing.

WGS of Ng strains was performed with the Illumina MiSeq platform at the UAB Heflin Genomics Core, using paired-end 250-bp reads. To analyze the spontaneous GenR mutant WGS data, adapter sequences and poor-quality reads were trimmed from raw sequence reads using TrimGalore. Quality-controlled reads were subsequently mapped to the FA19 reference genome (NCBI accession number: CP012026) using Burroughs-Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA) (51). Variants were called using Freebayes (https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907) and annotated using SnpEff (52). Common and unique variants were pulled for cross-comparison with VCFtools (53). For assembly and analysis of the fusA2 mutant genome in the WHO X background, raw WGS reads were assembled using reference-guided de novo assembly as described previously (54) with SeqMan NGen version 16.0 (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). In brief, raw reads were mapped against a reference strain (NCBI accession number: NZ_LT592155.1). The mapped reads were then grouped into blocks which were individually de novo assembled to form supercontigs. Supercontigs were subsequently scaffolded together using the reference sequences as a guide to aid in gap closure. This method allows for guided de novo assembly of the raw reads into complete genomic sequences, allowing comparison of the WHO X GenR strain to its unique WHO X parent strain. SNPs and indels were called using ArrayStar version 16.0 (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). Variant analysis used a stringency filter with minimum variant percentage at 80%, probability that the base does not match the reference set equal to 90%, and a minimum depth of 20 independent reads to call SNPs. The FASTQ files for the raw reads can be obtained from the Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA801231.

Determination of protein synthesis.

The assay was performed as previously described by Stubbings et al. (55), with some changes. Briefly, Ng was grown to mid-logarithmic phase in GC broth + 0.5× supplements I and II. Cultures were adjusted to 5 × 108 cells/mL and added to tubes containing 2 μCi of l-[3,4,5-3H(N)]-leucine (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) in the presence of Gen or the vehicle control (double-distilled H2O), followed by incubation at 37°C in a shaking water bath for 30 min. Ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 10% wt/vol) was then added and reactions were allowed to incubate on ice for 1 h to precipitate the protein content. Cultures were pelleted and washed three times with pre-warmed, un-supplemented GC broth with 10% TCA to remove unincorporated tritium. The precipitate was collected on 25-mm GF/C glass microfiber filters (Whatman, Maidstone, United Kingdom) and washed twice with solution containing 10% wt/vol TCA and 1% vol/vol acetic acid. Filters were dried overnight and then counted using CytoScint Liquid Scintillation Cocktail (MP Biomedicals). A non-radioactive experiment was conducted simultaneously to obtain viable counts after exposure to Gen (CFU). Macromolecular synthesis was expressed as disintegrations per minute (dpm) incorporated adjusted by CFU (56). The following equation was used to compare incorporation in the wild-type versus the mutant: [(DPMmutant@30mins/CFUmutant@30mins)/(DPMmutant@0mins/CFUmutant@0mins)]/[(DPMWT@30mins/CFUWT@30mins)/(DPMWT@0mins/CFUWT@0mins)].

Analysis of the fusA gene in international strains.

All available nucleotide sequences for fusA were downloaded from the Neisseria PubMLST database as previously described, using the FA19 fusA sequence as the reference (39). Strains for which no sequence could be acquired were excluded from analysis. Called nucleotide sequences were aligned to the FA19 sequence using MegAlign version 16.0 (DNASTAR, Madison, WI) and NCBI BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (57). SNPs were validated by the MegAlign version 16.0 (DNASTAR, Madison, WI) software.

Site-directed mutagenesis of fusA.

To determine if other point mutations in fusA could result in Gen resistance, we utilized the Quickchange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent) to replace the specific residues identified in the international study. Mutations were made in the pCR4-fusA plasmid. Primers for site-directed mutagenesis were designed utilizing the Agilent tool (https://www.agilent.com/store/primerDesignProgram.jsp). For allelic replacement of the chromosomal fusA region, constructs containing the desired point mutations were transformed into FA19 and selected on GCB agar containing 8, 12, or 16 μg/mL of Gen. For mutations which did not cause a change in the Gen MIC, we used congression transformation of the mutagenic plasmid with the pBad-rpsL plasmid and selected them on GCB agar containing Str (200 μg/mL). PCR screening was used for initial identification of transformants. DNA sequencing was used to confirm that, for each strain, the entire str locus contained only the desired point mutation(s).

Competitive infection of the murine lower genital tract.

Competitive infections were conducted as described (58). Briefly, female BALB/c mice (6 to 8 weeks old; Charles River Laboratories Inc., Wilmington, MA; NCI Frederick strain of inbred BALB/cAnNCr mice, strain code 555) were treated with 0.5 mg of Premarin given 2 days prior to, the day of, and 2 days after bacterial inoculation to increase susceptibility to N. gonorrhoeae. Mice were also given antibiotics to suppress the overgrowth of commensal flora that occurs under the influence of estrogen. Groups of mice were inoculated vaginally with similar numbers of FA19 rpsL and isogenic FA19 rpsL fusA2 bacteria (total dose: 106 CFU; 7 mice/group). Vaginal swabs were collected on days 1, 3, and 5 postinoculation and suspended in 100 μL GCB. Swab suspensions and inocula were cultured quantitatively on GCB supplemented with Str (FA19 rpsL; total number of CFU) and on GCB with Str and Gen (FA19 rpsL fusA2; CFU). Results are expressed as the competitive index (CI), as determined with the following equation: CI = [mutant CFU (output)/wild-type CFU (output)]/[mutant CFU (input)/wild-type CFU (input)]. A detection limit of 1 CFU was assigned for a strain which was not recovered from an infected mouse. A CI of >1 indicates that the mutant is more fit than the WT strain.

Statistical methods.

All data are expressed as means with standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance between all quantitative data was analyzed by Student’s t tests or one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Ethics statement.

Animal experiments were conducted at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) according to the guidelines of the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care under protocol no. MIC19-488, approved by the University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The USUHS animal facilities meet the housing service and surgical standards set forth in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,” NIH Publication no. 85-2, and USU Instruction no. 3203, “Use and Care of Laboratory Animals.” Animals were maintained under the supervision of a full-time veterinarian. For all experiments, mice were humanely euthanized by trained personnel upon reaching the study endpoint, using a compressed CO2 gas cylinder in the Laboratory of Animal Resources as per Uniformed Services University euthanasia guidelines (IACUC policy 13), which follow those established by the 2013 American Veterinary Medical Association Panel on Euthanasia (https://www.usuhs.edu/mps/facilities-resources).

Data availability.

The data sets which support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the University of Alabama-Birmingham Genomics and Bioinformatics Cores for whole-genome sequencing and preliminary SNP analysis.

This work was supported by NIH grant R01 AI 147609 (W.M.S.).

W.M.S. is the recipient of a Senior Research Career Scientist Award from the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the United States government.

We have no competing interests to declare.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Fig. S1 and S2 and Tables S1 to S5. Download aac.00251-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 1.2 MB (1.2MB, pdf)

REFERENCES

  • 1.CDC. 2019. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2018. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. 10.15620/cdc.79370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Korenromp E, Low N, Unemo M, Abu-Raddad LJ, Chico RM, Smolak A, Newman L, Gottlieb S, Thwin SS, Broutet N, Taylor MM. 2019. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ 97:548–562P. 10.2471/BLT.18.228486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Unemo M, Shafer WM. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:587–613. 10.1128/CMR.00010-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tien V, Punjabi C, Holubar MK. 2020. Antimicrobial resistance in sexually transmitted infections. J Travel Med 27:taz101. 10.1093/jtm/taz101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Unemo M, Lahra MM, Cole M, Galarza P, Ndowa F, Martin I, Dillon JR, Ramon-Pardo P, Bolan G, Wi T. 2019. World Health Organization Global Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (WHO GASP): review of new data and evidence to inform international collaborative actions and research efforts. Sex Health 16:412–425. 10.1071/SH19023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Unemo M, Lahra MM, Escher M, et al. 2021. WHO global antimicrobial resistance surveillance (GASP/GLASS) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae 2017–2018: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Microbe 2:E627–E636. 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00171-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Unemo M, Golparian D, Eyre DW. 2019. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and treatment of gonorrhea. Methods Mol Biol 1997:37–58. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9496-0_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO. 2017. Prioritization of pathogens to guide discovery, research and development of new antibiotics for drug-resistant bacterial infections, including tuberculosis. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311820. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.CDC. 2021. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2019: Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) supplement and profiles. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.WHO. 2016. WHO guidelines for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/gonorrhoea-treatment-guidelines/en/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Unemo M, Ross J, Serwin AB, Gomberg M, Cusini M, Jensen JS. 2020. 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int J STD AIDS 29:095646242094912. 10.1177/0956462420949126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Australasian Sexual Health Alliance (ASHA). 2016. Gonorrhoea. In Australian STI management guidelines for use in primary care [website]. ASHA, Sydney, Australia. Available from: www.sti.guidelines.org.au/sexually-transmissible-infections/gonorrhoea#management. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Romanowski B, Robinson J, Wong T. 2013. Gonococcal infections. In Canadian guidelines on sexually transmitted infections. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Available from: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/std-mts/sti-its/cgsti-ldcits/assets/pdf/section-5-6-eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fifer H, Saunders J, Soni S, Sadiq ST, FitzGerald M. 2020. 2018 UK national guideline for the management of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Int J STD AIDS 31:4–15. 10.1177/0956462419886775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.St Cyr S, Barbee L, Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Pham C, Schlanger K, Torrone E, Weinstock H, Kersh EN, Thorpe P. 2020. Update to CDC’s treatment guidelines for gonococcal infection, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:1911–1916. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6950a6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hamasuna R, Yasuda M, Takahashi S, Uehara S, Kawai Y, Miyairi I, Arakawa S, Kiyota H, Japanese Association for Infectious Disease/Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, JAID/JSC Guide/Guidelines to Clinical Management of Infectious Disease Preparing Committee, Sexually Transmitted Infection Working Group. 2021. The JAID/JSC guidelines to Clinical Management of Infectious Disease 2017 concerning male urethritis and related disorders. J Infect Chemother 27:546–554. 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang QQ, Liu QZ, Xu JH. 2020. Guidelines of clinical management of sexually transmitted diseases. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, China. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alirol E, Wi TE, Bala M, Bazzo ML, Chen XS, Deal C, Dillon JR, Kularatne R, Heim J, Hooft van Huijsduijnen R, Hook EW, Lahra MM, Lewis DA, Ndowa F, Shafer WM, Tayler L, Workowski K, Unemo M, Balasegaram M. 2017. Multidrug-resistant gonorrhea: a research and development roadmap to discover new medicines. PLoS Med 14:e1002366. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seña AC, Bachmann L, Johnston C, Wi T, Workowski K, Hook EW, 3rd, Hocking JS, Drusano G, Unemo M. 2020. Optimising treatments for sexually transmitted infections: surveillance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, therapeutic strategies, and molecular resistance prediction. Lancet Infect Dis 20:e181–e191. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30171-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brown LB, Krysiak R, Kamanga G, Mapanje C, Kanyamula H, Banda B, Mhango C, Hoffman M, Kamwendo D, Hobbs M, Hosseinipour MC, Martinson F, Cohen MS, Hoffman IF. 2010. Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility in Lilongwe, Malawi, 2007. Sex Transm Dis 37:169–172. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bf575c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matoga M, Chen JS, Krysiak R, Ndalama B, Massa C, Bonongwe N, Mathiya E, Kamtambe B, Jere E, Chikaonda T, Golparian D, Unemo M, Cohen MS, Hobbs MM, Hoffman IF. 2021. Gentamicin susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and treatment outcomes for urogenital gonorrhea after twenty-five years of sustained gentamicin use in Malawi. Sex Transm Dis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chisholm SA, Quaye N, Cole MJ, Fredlund H, Hoffmann S, Jensen JS, van de Laar MJ, Unemo M, Ison CA. 2011. An evaluation of gentamicin susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:592–595. 10.1093/jac/dkq476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu JW, Xu WQ, Zhu XY, Dai XQ, Chen SC, Han Y, Liu J, Chen XS, Yin YP. 2019. Gentamicin susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from 7 provinces in China. Infect Drug Resist 12:2471–2476. 10.2147/IDR.S214059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mann LM, Kirkcaldy RD, Papp JR, Torrone EA. 2018. Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to gentamicin: Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2015–2016. Sex Transm Dis 45:96–98. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang Y, Shen M, Yang J, Dai M, Chang Y, Zhang C, Luan G, Ling B, Jia X. 2016. Prevalence of carbapenemases among high-level aminoglycoside-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a university hospital in China. Exp Ther Med 12:3642–3652. 10.3892/etm.2016.3828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ibacache-Quiroga C, Oliveros JC, Couce A, Blázquez J. 2018. Parallel evolution of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Escherichia coli under low and high mutation supply rates. Front Microbiol 9:427. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goli HR, Nahaei MR, Rezaee MA, Hasani A, Kafil HS, Aghazadeh M, Nikbakht M, Khalili Y. 2018. Role of MexAB-OprM and MexXY-OprM efflux pumps and class 1 integrons in resistance to antibiotics in burn and intensive care unit isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Public Health 11:364–372. 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Poole K. 2005. Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:479–487. 10.1128/AAC.49.2.479-487.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Morita Y, Tomida J, Kawamura Y. 2012. Primary mechanisms mediating aminoglycoside resistance in the multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate PA7. Microbiology (Reading) 158:1071–1083. 10.1099/mic.0.054320-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krahn T, Gilmour C, Tilak J, Fraud S, Kerr N, Lau CH, Poole K. 2012. Determinants of intrinsic aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5591–5602. 10.1128/AAC.01446-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Scribner MR, Santos-Lopez A, Marshall CW, Deitrick C, Cooper VS. 2020. Parallel evolution of tobramycin resistance across species and environments. mBio 11:e00932-20. 10.1128/mBio.00932-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mogre A, Veetil RT, Seshasayee ASN. 2017. Modulation of global transcriptional regulatory networks as a strategy for increasing kanamycin resistance of the translational elongation factor-G mutants in Escherichia coli. G3 (Bethesda) 7:3955–3966. 10.1534/g3.117.300284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bolard A, Plésiat P, Jeannot K. 2018. Mutations in gene fusA1 as a novel mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01835-17. 10.1128/AAC.01835-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Allen GP, Deao KM, Hill SA, Schipelliti SM, Tran T. 2021. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial resistance selection in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 58:106417. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Remmele CW, Xian Y, Albrecht M, Faulstich M, Fraunholz M, Heinrichs E, Dittrich MT, Müller T, Reinhardt R, Rudel T. 2014. Transcriptional landscape and essential genes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Nucleic Acids Res 42:10579–10595. 10.1093/nar/gku762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Salsi E, Farah E, Dann J, Ermolenko DN. 2014. Following movement of domain IV of elongation factor G during ribosomal translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:15060–15065. 10.1073/pnas.1410873111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ohnishi M, Golparian D, Shimuta K, Saika T, Hoshina S, Iwasaku K, Nakayama S, Kitawaki J, Unemo M. 2011. Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of untreatable gonorrhea? Detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3538–3545. 10.1128/AAC.00325-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ezewudo MN, Joseph SJ, Castillo-Ramirez S, Dean D, Del Rio C, Didelot X, Dillon JA, Selden RF, Shafer WM, Turingan RS, Unemo M, Read TD. 2015. Population structure of Neisseria gonorrhoeae based on whole genome data and its relationship with antibiotic resistance. PeerJ 3:e806. 10.7717/peerj.806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. 2018. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 3:124. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rice PA, Shafer WM, Ram S, Jerse AE. 2017. Neisseria gonorrhoeae: drug resistance, mouse models, and vaccine development. Annu Rev Microbiol 71:665–686. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vincent LR, Kerr SR, Tan Y, Tomberg J, Raterman EL, Dunning Hotopp JC, Unemo M, Nicholas RA, Jerse AE. 2018. In vivo-selected compensatory mutations restore the fitness cost of mosaic penA alleles that confer ceftriaxone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. mBio 9:e01905-17. 10.1128/mBio.01905-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ibargoyen García U, Nieto Toboso MC, Azpeitia EM, Imaz Perez M, Hernandez Ragpa L, Álava Menica JA, Cámara Pérez MM, López de Munain López J, Muñoz Sanchez J, Díaz de Tuesta Del Arco JL, Cisterna Cancer R. 2020. Epidemiological surveillance study of gonococcal infection in Northern Spain. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) 38:59–64. English, Spanish. 10.1016/j.eimc.2019.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cameron-McDermott SM, Barrow GJ, Webster AM, De La Haye CO, Wood DHE, Lewis VM, Nicholson A, Reynolds-Campbell GY, Thoms-Rodriguez CA, Roye-Green KJ, Otto-Stewart N, Miller ZN, Tomlinson JA, Skyers N, Unemo M, Anzinger JJ. 2021. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates and syndromic treatment of men with urethral discharge in Kingston, Jamaica, 2018–19. J Antimicrob Chemother 77:218–222. 10.1093/jac/dkab340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bala M, Singh V, Bhargava A, Kakran M, Joshi NC, Bhatnagar R. 2016. Gentamicin susceptibility among a sample of multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7518–7521. 10.1128/AAC.01907-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kularatne R, Kufa T, Gumede L, Maseko V. 2020. Comparison of gentamicin MICs by agar dilution and Etest for clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:2599–2604. 10.1093/jac/dkaa202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yéo A, Kouamé-Blavo B, Kouamé CE, Ouattara A, Yao AC, Gbedé BD, Bazan F, Faye-Ketté H, Dosso M, Wi T, Unemo M. 2019. Establishment of a gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance programme, in accordance with World Health Organization standards, in Côte d'Ivoire, western Africa, 2014–2017. Sex Transm Dis 46:179–184. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dillard JP. 2011. Genetic Manipulation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 4:Unit4A.2. 10.1002/9780471729259.mc04a02s23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sarubbi FA, Jr., Blackman E, Sparling PF. 1974. Genetic mapping of linked antibiotic resistance loci in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 120:1284–1292. 10.1128/jb.120.3.1284-1292.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Johnson SR, Grad Y, Ganakammal SR, Burroughs M, Frace M, Lipsitch M, Weil R, Trees D. 2014. In vitro selection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae mutants with elevated MIC values and increased resistance to cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:6986–6989. 10.1128/AAC.03082-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jerse AE, Sharma ND, Simms AN, Crow ET, Snyder LA, Shafer WM. 2003. A gonococcal efflux pump system enhances bacterial survival in a female mouse model of genital tract infection. Infect Immun 71:5576–5582. 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5576-5582.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang Le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6:80–92. 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, McVean G, Durbin R, 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27:2156–2158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lischer HEL, Shimizu KK. 2017. Reference-guided de novo assembly approach improves genome reconstruction for related species. BMC Bioinformatics 18:474. 10.1186/s12859-017-1911-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stubbings W, Bostock J, Ingham E, Chopra I. 2006. Mechanisms of the post-antibiotic effects induced by rifampicin and gentamicin in Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:444–448. 10.1093/jac/dkl225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Guan L, Blumenthal RM, Burnham JC. 1992. Analysis of macromolecular biosynthesis to define the quinolone-induced postantibiotic effect in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:2118–2124. 10.1128/AAC.36.10.2118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Raterman EL, Jerse AE. 2019. Female mouse model of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection. Methods Mol Biol 1997:413–429. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9496-0_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Fig. S1 and S2 and Tables S1 to S5. Download aac.00251-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 1.2 MB (1.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data sets which support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES