Abstract
Vertical transmission of Bartonella infection has been reported for several mammalian species including mice and humans. Accordingly, it is commonly held that acquired immunological tolerance contributes critically to the high prevalence of Bartonellae in wild-ranging rodent populations. Here we studied an experimental model of Bartonella infection in mice to assess the impact of maternal and newborn immune defense on vertical transmission and bacterial persistence in the offspring, respectively. Congenital infection was frequently observed in B cell-deficient mothers but not in immunocompetent dams, which correlated with a rapid onset of an antibacterial antibody response in infected WT animals. Intriguingly, B cell-deficient offspring with congenital infection exhibited long-term bacteremia whereas B cell-sufficient offspring cleared bacteremia within a few weeks after birth. Clearance of congenital Bartonella infection resulted in immunity against bacterial rechallenge, with the animals mounting Bartonella-neutralizing antibody responses of normal magnitude. These observations reveal a key role for humoral immune defense by the mother and offspring in preventing and eliminating vertical transmission. Moreover, congenital Bartonella infection does not induce humoral immune tolerance but results in anti-bacterial immunity, questioning the contribution of neonatal tolerance to Bartonella prevalence in wild-ranging rodents.
Author summary
Vertical transmission of Bartonella has been reported in small rodents but also in at least one human case. The prevalence of these bacteria in the wild is extremely high. While a protective antibody response clearly controls the infection in the experimental model, observations from the wild indicate that this might not always be the case. This led to the long-standing hypothesis that Bartonella might induce immunological tolerance. To study if transplacental transmission of these bacteria results in immunological tolerance in the offspring, we used a mouse model of Bartonella taylorii infection. We infected wildtype and immunocompromised females (Rag1-/- and μMT) and observed that transmission only occurred in mothers lacking a functional B-cell response. Immunocompetent offspring, however, cleared the infection and were protected from reinfection by the same Bartonella strain due to the presence of protective antibodies. Thus, even though transplacental transmission of Bartonella is possible under the right circumstances, we find no evidence for immunological tolerance or persistent infection in the offspring.
Introduction
Bartonellae are gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacteria, which are transmitted by blood-sucking arthropods [1–3], establish long-lasting intra-erythrocytic bacteremia and can cause significant human disease [4–6]. Antibody responses to Bartonella have been reported from infected cats [7], mice [8,9] and humans [10–14], and we have recently shown that the clearance of Bartonella bacteremia in mice is accompanied by a neutralizing antibody response preventing bacterial attachment to red blood cells [9]. In contrast, antibody measurements in Bartonella-infected wild-captured rodents detected only low or undetectable genogroup-specific responses [15–17], whereas the prevalence of active Bartonella infection in wild-caught rodents can reach 65% [18]. These and related findings [15] led to the hypothesis that infected animals in the wild differ from experimentally infected animals with respect to their Bartonella-specific immune responsiveness. Systems serology studies in Bartonella-infected cats demonstrated, however, that only about 7% of the bacterial proteome is targeted by the host antibody response [19], revealing important limitations of earlier immunoreactivity studies utilizing whole bacterial lysates as antigenic assay substrate [15–17]. These few antigenic targets in natural infection were disproportionately localized in the bacterial membrane, which is important in light of recent discoveries on the hypervariability of a key antibody target domain in a Bartonella outer membrane protein [9]. In conjunction with frequent gene transfers by the gene transfer agent (GTA) [20,21] as a source of genetic variability of Bartonella in the wild, these new insights question the utility of genogroup-specific whole bacterial cell lysates for an assessment of Bartonella seroprevalence [15,16].
Specific immunological tolerance in the offspring owing to vertical transmission was proposed as a mechanism of supposedly life-long persistent Bartonella infection [15]. Observations made in the 1930s on immunological tolerance to a virus transmitted in utero [22] have contributed to the formulation of the clonal selection theory, and the experimental validation of the concept by in utero administered allografts culminated in the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar for the concept of immunological tolerance [23,24]. In light of this it was intriguing that Bartonella spp. could be isolated from embryos and neonates born to captured rodents that carried the bacteria but lacked specific antibodies [15]. Transplacental transmission itself was experimentally validated in a murine model of Bartonella infection, yet was observed to cause fetal loss and resorption, supposedly as a result of the maternal immune response [25]. Analogously to mice, vertical transmission of Bartonella has been reported in a human patient [26] but has not been observed in infected cats [27] or cattle [28].
Here we report that upon vertical transmission only immunocompromised offspring developed persistent bacteremia whereas immunocompetent offspring clear the infection and develop protective immune memory. These data argue against neonatal immunological tolerance as a main mechanism of Bartonella persistence and widespread infection in the wild.
Results
Efficient transplacental B. taylorii transmission in B cell-deficient but not wildtype mice
To investigate transplacental transmission of Bartonella and its outcome in the offspring, we exploited the B. taylorii infection model of C57BL/6 mice. It offers the advantage that further to quantification of bacteremia in blood a bacterial neutralization assay has been developed allowing for the quantification of protective antibodies in the sera of infected mice [9]. To address the possibility that maternal immune defense interfered with bacterial transmission we compared WT mice with gene knock-out mouse strains defective in B cells (μMT) or lacking both T and B cells (Rag1-/-) (Fig 1A). We infected dams with 107 cfu i.d. and mated them ten days later with uninfected males, an experimental setup that has previously been used to study vertical transmission in a murine model of Bartonella infection [25]. This timing of infection relative to mating warranted that the entire gestation occurred in the bacteremic period of WT animals (Fig 1A and 1B). As expected, WT but not B cell deficient dams mounted antibacterially protective erythrocyte adhesion inhibiting (EAI) antibodies [9] in the course of their pregnancy (S1A and S1B Fig). When analyzing embryos on day 18 of gestation (day 28 of the experiment), we failed to detect Bartonellae in any one of the 48 embryos extracted from a total of 7 WT litters, indicating vertical transmission of B. taylorii was highly inefficient in WT animals in this setting and did not lead to a productive transmission of bacteria (Fig 1C and Table 1). In contrast, Bartonella infection was detected in at least one embryo from 6 out of 6 Rag1-/- litters analyzed, with a total of 22 out of 42 embryos culture-positive (Table 1). Similarly, 5 out of 5 μMT litters analyzed by embryo extraction contained at least one infected embryo, with positivity rates within litters ranging from 33.3–71.4%. These differences in vertical transmission rates between WT and immunocompromised mothers suggested that the maternal and/or fetal immune systems can interfere with Bartonella transmission.
Table 1. Transplacental transmission of B. taylorii in B cell-deficient, but not wildtype mice.
Genotype of the mother1 | Embryo extraction2 | ||||
# of analyzed litters | % of culture-positive offspring per litter; mean ± SD (range) | # of analyzed embryos | # of culture-positive embryos | # of culture-positive placentae | |
WT | 7 | 0 ± 0 (0–0) | 48 | 0 | 18 |
μMT | 5 | 50.0 ± 15.2 (33.3–71.4) | 31 | 17 | 25 |
Rag1-/- | 6 | 59.8 ± 15.3 (25.0–62.5) | 42 | 22 | 41 |
Offspring 4–5 weeks of age3 | |||||
# of analyzed litters | % of bacteremic offspring per litter; mean ± SD (range) | # of analyzed pups | # of bacteremic pups | % bacteremic pups | |
WT | 9 | 0 ± 0 (0–0) | 47 | 0 | 0 |
μMT | 17 | 33.3 ± 28.6 (0–100) | 54 | 15 | 27.8 |
Rag1-/- | 12 | 34.3 ± 24.7 (0–66.7) | 68 | 12 | 17.6 |
1 Dams were infected with 107 cfu B. taylorii i.d. and were mated 10 days later with uninfected males. For the analysis of 4-5-week-old Rag1-/- and μMT offspring, persistently infected Rag1-/- and μMT dams were also mated continuously.
2 Total numbers for extracted embryos and placentae were determined on day 18 of gestation.
3 Living offspring were analyzed at 4-5 weeks of age.
Next we analyzed the living offspring at 4–5 weeks of age (Fig 1C). The percentage of bacteremic μMT offspring per litter was significantly lower than determined for extracted embryos, and an analogous statistical trend was noted for Rag1-/- offspring (Fig 1C). While an average of 50.0% μMT embryos and 59.8% Rag1-/- embryos were culture-positive, only 33.3% of μMT pups and 34.3% of Rag1-/- pups were infected at 4–5 weeks of age, albeit with considerable variation between litters (Fig 1C and Table 1). We noted that litters of infected Rag1-/- dams were significantly larger at the time point of embryo extraction than observed on the day after birth and a similar trend, although not statistically significant (p = 0.1068), was noted for litters of μMT mothers but not for WT controls (S1C and S1D and S1E Fig), which correlated with bacterial transmission in Rag1-/- and μMT, but not WT mice.
Lack of correlation between bacterial burden in maternal blood and embryos
Next we aimed to determine if the bacterial burden in maternal blood and/or the placenta was decisive for vertical Bartonella transmission. In keeping with the kinetics of bacteremia in WT, μMT and Rag1-/- mice (Fig 1B) [8,9], bacterial loads in the blood of μMT females at the time point of mating were similar to WT mice, whereas bacteremia in Rag1-/- females was higher than in the other two groups (Fig 2A). An assessment of bacterial burden in the placenta on day 18 of gestation followed an analogous pattern (Fig 2B and Table 1): 18 out of 48 WT placentae (36.7%) contained detectable bacteria at levels that were in the range of those 25 out of 31 μMT placentae (80.6%) that harbored Bartonella. Bacteria were also detected in all but one Rag1-/- placenta analyzed (41/42, 97.7%), with on average higher bacterial loads than in the placentae of WT and μMT dams (Fig 2B). It seems possible if not likely, however, that this placental bacterial load consisted at least partially in residual maternal blood. While WT embryos remained culture-negative, the bacterial burden of infected Rag1-/- and μMT embryos was in similar ranges despite somewhat differential levels of maternal bacteremia and placental bacterial loads (Fig 2C, compare Fig 2A and 2B). Accordingly, a comparison of maternal bacteremia with placental and embryonic bacterial burden at the level of individual dams and embryos did not evidence a clear quantitative correlation of these three parameters (Fig 2D and 2E), except that all infected embryos had an infected placenta, too. Taken together, these data suggested that maternal bacteremia determined the average bacterial burden in the placenta, whereas maternal antibody responses prevented Bartonella infection of the embryo irrespective of the bacterial load observed in the placenta.
Immunocompetent offspring clear vertically transmitted Bartonella infection and develop protective immunity
Next, we aimed to study the immunological outcome in congenitally infected offspring. We mated persistently infected Rag1-/- and μMT females with partners that were either WT or of the respective same genotype. The resulting offspring born to these dams were, therefore, either immunocompetent Rag1+/- and μMT+/- mice or immunocompromised Rag1-/- and μMT-/- animals, respectively (Fig 3A). Analogously to the adult infection of Rag1-/- and μMT-/- mice, vertical transmission to animals of the same genotype resulted in life-long bacteremia (Fig 3B and 3C; compare Fig 1B) [8,9]. Intriguingly, however, immunocompetent heterozygous Rag1+/- and μMT+/- offspring cleared Bartonella infection within 5 to 11 weeks after birth (Fig 3B and 3C). This observation suggested that the offspring’s adaptive immune defense prevented the life-long persistence of vertically transmitted B. taylorii infection in a B cell-dependent manner. With the aim of identifying immunological correlates of anti-Bartonella immunity in vertically transmitted infection we evaluated antibacterial antibody responses of immunocompetent μMT+/- offspring that had been born to bacteremic μMT mothers. We hypothesized that bacteremic offspring mounted protective anti-bacterial B cell responses to control Bartonella infection. To test this, we employed our recently described erythrocyte adhesion inhibition (EAI) assay, which can be used to quantitatively assess protective Bartonella-specific antibody responses in the serum of mice [9]. Low-level serum EAI titers were detected in four out of 21 abacteremic μMT+/- offspring and in none of the 14 littermates exhibiting detectable bacteremia at 4–5 weeks of age (Fig 3D). These findings raised the possibility that vertically transmitted bacteria triggered an antibacterial B cell response that was either weak or not well-maintained, or that our assay system was insufficiently sensitive to consistently detect these responses. Hence, we tested whether congenitally infected offspring, after clearance of B. taylorii, were immune to re-challenge with the pathogen (Fig 3E). Mice that had cleared vertically transmitted infection remained sterile upon challenge whereas all littermates with undetectable bacterial loads after birth developed bacteremia (Fig 3F). One and two weeks post challenge we collected serum to determine EAI titers. At one week after challenge six out of 15 μMT+/- mice with congenital infection and three out of 11 littermates without congenital infection mounted detectable EAI responses. Within two weeks after Bartonella challenge, functional anti-Bartonella antibody responses were detectable in almost all μMT+/- animals, irrespective of postnatal bacteremia (11/11 congenitally infected, 14/15 litter mates; Fig 3G). Taken together these results showed that mice with vertically transmitted B. taylorii infection cleared the bacteria. Moreover, they formed protective immunological memory, which prevented Bartonella bacteremia upon re-challenge. Unimpaired anti-Bartonella antibody responses to bacterial re-exposure indicated further, that animals with congenitally acquired Bartonella infection had not developed durable immunological tolerance to the pathogen.
Discussion
This study deciphers the role of the adaptive immune defence in curtailing vertical B. taylorii transmission and bacterial persistence in the infected offspring. Not only does the maternal B cell response restrict transmission but the immunocompetent offspring’s immune defence also clears the infection, protects against reinfection and mounts a functional antibody response upon bacterial re-challenge. It appears, therefore, that counter to earlier assumptions there is no discernible humoral immune tolerance to Bartonella upon in utero transmission.
The concept that antigen exposure in utero or perinatally results in immunological tolerance [23,24] is substantially influenced by early observations from mice congenitally infected with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) [22] and later has found validation in perinatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection of humans [29]. Here we report that immunocompetent mice clear vertically acquired Bartonella infection in a B cell-dependent manner and develop protective immunity against bacterial re-challenge. Acquired immunological tolerance is best validated for the clonal elimination of CD8 T cell precursors in the thymus as elegantly demonstrated in LCMV carrier mice [30], whereas central CD4 T cell tolerance to the same virus seems incomplete [31,32]. Accordingly, neither murine carriers of LCMV nor persistently HBV-infected humans exhibit solid humoral immune tolerance to the viruses they carry, and antiviral antibody formation is commonly observed [33–39]. From a purely immunological standpoint the lack of humoral immune tolerance to congenital Bartonella infection may, therefore, largely resemble the situation in congenital LCMV and HBV infections. The main difference may rather consist in the predominantly humoral immune-mediated control of Bartonella infection [8,9], whereas LCMV and HBV can only be eliminated when a potent effector CD8+ T cell response is mounted [40,41]. Perinatally acquired CD8 T cell tolerance may thus result in LCMV and HBV persistence whereas Bartonella is effectively eliminated by the incompletely tolerized humoral arm of the immune system.
The failure to detect antibody responses in wild-captured Bartonella-infected rodents [15,16] and the presence of Bartonella in their embryos and neonates [15] have led to speculations that these bacteria exploit transplacental transmission to cause life-long tolerant infection. As discussed above, our data argue against neonatal tolerance as a mechanism that substantially contributes to the high prevalence of Bartonellosis in wild-ranging rodents. Instead, our earlier reports have documented that Bartonella modulates the host’s innate immune response to its benefit [42] and that antigenic variation of key antibody targets is presumed to facilitate repeated infections of the same rodent host by closely related bacterial strains [9], altogether warranting the evolutionary success of these bacteria in the wild.
Congenital Bartonella infection has been observed in embryos and neonatal mice born to naturally infected, wild-captured white-footed mice and cotton rats [15]. In contrast, an earlier report on a murine model of transplacental Bartonella birtlesii transmission in experimentally infected BALB/c mice described fetal resorptions and a reduced body weight of viable fetuses, which was supposedly due to Bartonella-induced placental vasculitis and resulting placental insufficiency [25]. Unlike for wild-captured white-footed mice [15], however, vertical B. birtlesii transmission in experimentally infected BALB/c mice was limited to fetal resorptions, without any evidence for bacterial transmission to living offspring. In keeping with the latter findings, our study on Bartonella taylorii infection in C57BL/6 mice suggests vertical transmission is restricted to B cell-deficient dams. In contrast to the B. birtlesii infection model in BALB/c mice, however, we did not find any embryos undergoing resorption when dissecting the uteri for extraction of embryos and placentae. While differences in the occurrence and possibly the timing of prenatal lethality may be due to a differential inflammatory response profile of the inbred mouse strains tested [43], we propose that maternal antibodies could interfere with bacteria crossing the placental barrier, similar to the prevention of red blood cell adhesion [9]. Hence, the kinetics of the antibacterial antibody response may contribute to the probability of vertical transmission and its outcome.
We observed that Rag1-/- litters on the day after birth were smaller than at the time point of embryo extraction (E18), and a similar trend, although not statistically significant, was noted for μMT-/- litters but not for WT litters. This finding may indicate that congenital Bartonella infection may negatively impact the offspring’s perinatal fitness. The reduced prevalence of Bartonella bacteremia in 4-5-week-old μMT mice as compared to extracted μMT embryos and an analogous trend in Rag1-/- mice provide independent support for this hypothesis.
Limitations of our study consist in the largely undefined role of maternal and fetal T cells in vertical Bartonella transmission. Higher bacterial loads in Rag1-/- as compared to μMT-/- mothers likely explain a trend towards higher transmission rates in the former and suggest the role of T cells in Bartonella control extends beyond the mere help to B cells. The contribution of individual immunoglobulin isotypes to the prevention of vertical transmission and to the control of bacteremia in the offspring, respectively, have not been addressed by our study either. While the IgM response of activation-induced deaminase- (AID-) deficient mice has been shown to effectively control B. taylorii in adult mice without a need for isotype class switch [9], the ability of IgG to cross the placenta may improve its antibacterial efficacy at the maternal-fetal interface. Last but not least the lack of transplacental Bartonella transmission by WT mothers in our model precluded us from analyzing a potential role of breast milk antibodies in preventing bacteremia in the offspring.
Taken together the present findings demonstrate that B cells represent a dual layer of immune protection against vertical transmission of B. taylorii, and possibly of other Bartonella species, in mice. Maternal B cell responses generally prevent infection of the offspring in utero and, if accidentally overrun, the B cell system of the newborn represents a fail-safe mechanism for the prevention of bacterial persistence during an otherwise immunologically vulnerable period of life.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Animal handling was performed in accordance with the Swiss Animal Protection law and under the auspice of the institutional animal welfare officers. All animal experiments were performed at the University of Basel, with permission by the Veterinary Office of the Canton Basel-Stadt (license 1741_29584).
Cultivation of bacteria
Bartonella taylorii IBS 296 SmR WT (LSB001) [44] and GFP+ (LSB115) [9] were grown at 35°C, 5% CO2 on Columbia blood agar (CBA; Oxoid Cat#CM0331) containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Oxoid, Cat#SR0051), 100 μg/ml streptomycin (AppliChem, Cat#A2951) and 10 μg/ml gentamycin (AppliChem, Cat#A11492) if required. Bacteria were streaked as thumbnails for three days followed by a subsequent expansion on a fresh plate for 2 days prior to usage. The B. taylorii IBS 296 strain was used for this study since it readily establishes robust bacteremia in mice and its immunobiology in mice has been thoroughly characterized [9,45]. Moreover, a GFP-expressing variant is available, thereby enabling the functional EIA antibody readout reported in Figs 3G and S1A and S1B. Streptomycin resistance (SmR) encoded by a mutation in rpsL facilitates targeted genetic manipulation [46], but is not expected to impact the bacterium’s behavior or immunobiology in mice, neither does this strain feature any other genetic alterations that are known or expected to bias the results reported in this study.
Animal experimentation
5 week old WT C57Bl/6JRj and Balb/cJRj mice were obtained from Janvier labs, France. Rag1-/- [47] were bred at the Laboratory Animal Science Center (LASC, University of Zurich, Switzerland). μMT mice [48] were obtained from Jackson Laboratories, USA, and a colony was maintained locally at the University of Basel, Switzerland.
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane to administer 107 cfu B. taylorii i.d. into the ear. At each time point, for which bacteremia is reported in the figures, 50 μl of blood was collected from the tail vein in a sterile manner into 3.8% Na-citrate (Merck, Cat#71497). An interval of at least one week was respected between blood draws, except for the first two weeks after adult infection (reported in Figs 1B and S1A and S1B), during which two weekly blood samples were collected. Blood was frozen at -80°C. After thawing serial dilutions were plated of CBA blood plates containing streptomycin and incubated at 35°C 5% CO2 for 5–7 days.
For embryo extraction, females were mated on day 10 post infection and were monitored daily for plug formation. Embryos and placentae were extracted in a sterile manner on day 18 of gestation. After a collagenase digest (30min at 37°C in 3 mg/ml Collagenase IV (Gibco, Cat#17104019), 2% FCS (Amimed, Cat#2-01F30I) in DMEM (Gibco, Cat#61965), the digested embryos and placentae were pushed through a cell strainer into DMEM containing 10% FCS. Samples were frozen at -80°C for erythrocyte lysis and bacterial release, and after thawing were plated in dilution series on CBA blood plates containing streptomycin and incubated at 35°C, 5% CO2 for 5–7 days.
For the analysis of living offspring, Rag1-/- and μMT females were mated continuously (from day 10 post infection onwards) with either WT, Rag1-/- or μMT males respectively. The offspring were weaned at 3 weeks of age and blood was collected starting at 4–5 weeks of age.
Erythrocyte adhesion inhibition (EAI) assay
The EAI assay was performed as described in detail elsewhere [9]. In brief, erythrocytes obtained from Balb/cJRj mice were purified using a Ficoll gradient (Ficoll-Paque, VWR, Cat#17-1440-02) and were stored for up to 2 weeks in DMEM (Gibco, Cat#61965) containing 10% FCS FCS (Amimed, Cat#2-01F30I) at 4°C prior to use.
Serial dilutions of sera were performed in 96-well U-bottom plates (Greiner, Cat#650161) in DMEM containing 10% FCS. 5x105 cfu B. taylorii expressing GFP were added per well and the plates were incubated at 35°C, 5% CO2 for 1h prior to the addition of 106 red blood cells (multiplicity of infection, MOI = 0.5) in 100 μl DMEM containing 10% FCS. The next day, the supernatant was removed, the red blood cells were fixed using 1% PFA (EMS, Cat#EMS-15710) and 0.2% gluturaldehyde (EMS, Cat#16020) in PBS (BioConcept, Cat#3-05F29-I) for 10 min at 4°C in the dark. After quenching with 2% FCS in PBS, the cells were analysed for GFP signal by Flow Cytometry (BD Canto II using HTS autosampler).
Data analysis
Statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed using GraphPad Prism Software. Student’s t test was used for pair-wise comparisons, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test was performed for the comparison of more than two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 as highly significant, P ≤ 0.1 was interpreted as a statistical trend.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
C.D. was funded by grant 310030B_201273 by the Swiss National Science Foundation; https://www.snf.ch/en. D.D.P was funded by Hans Buss Stiftung, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland. https://www.fundraiso.ch/en/sponsor/hans-buss-stiftung. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Harms A, Dehio C. Intruders below the Radar: Molecular Pathogenesis of Bartonella spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25: 42–78. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05009-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chomel BB, Boulouis H-J, Breitschwerdt EB, Kasten RW, Vayssier-Taussat M, Birtles RJ, et al. Ecological fitness and strategies of adaptation of Bartonella species to their hosts and vectors. Vet Res. 2009;40: 29. doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wagner A, Dehio C. Role of distinct type-IV-secretion systems and secreted effector sets in host adaptation by pathogenic Bartonella species. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21: e13004. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maguiña C, Gotuzzo E. Bartonellosis. New and old. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2000;14: 1–22, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70215-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maguiña C, Guerra H, Ventosilla P. Bartonellosis. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27: 271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2008.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mada PK, Zulfiqar H, Joel Chandranesan AS. Bartonellosis. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430874/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kabeya H, Umehara T, Okanishi H, Tasaki I, Kamiya M, Misawa A, et al. Experimental infection of cats with Bartonella henselae resulted in rapid clearance associated with T helper 1 immune responses. Microbes Infect. 2009;11: 716–720. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koesling J, Aebischer T, Falch C, Schülein R, Dehio C. Cutting edge: antibody-mediated cessation of hemotropic infection by the intraerythrocytic mouse pathogen Bartonella grahamii. J Immunol. 2001;167: 11–14. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Siewert LK, Korotaev A, Sedzicki J, Fromm K, Pinschewer DD, Dehio C. The Bartonella autotransporter CFA is a protective antigen and hypervariable target of neutralizing antibodies blocking erythrocyte infection. 2021. Sep p. 2021.09.29.462357. doi: 10.1101/2021.09.29.462357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cáceres-Ríos H, Rodríguez-Tafur J, Bravo-Puccio F, Maguiña-Vargas C, Díaz CS, Ramos DC, et al. Verruga peruana: an infectious endemic angiomatosis. Crit Rev Oncog. 1995;6: 47–56. doi: 10.1615/critrevoncog.v6.i1.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Karem KL. Immune aspects of Bartonella. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2000;26: 133–145. doi: 10.1080/10408410008984173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Raoult D, Fournier PE, Drancourt M, Marrie TJ, Etienne J, Cosserat J, et al. Diagnosis of 22 new cases of Bartonella endocarditis. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125: 646–652. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-8-199610150-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Spach DH, Koehler JE. Bartonella-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1998;12: 137–155. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70414-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Regnery RL, Olson JG, Perkins BA, Bibb W. Serological response to “Rochalimaea henselae” antigen in suspected cat-scratch disease. Lancet. 1992;339: 1443–1445. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92032-b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kosoy MY, Regnery RL, Kosaya OI, Jones DC, Marston EL, Childs JE. Isolation of Bartonella spp. from embryos and neonates of naturally infected rodents. J Wildl Dis. 1998;34: 305–309. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-34.2.305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kosoy M, Mandel E, Green D, Marston E, Jones D, Childs J. Prospective studies of Bartonella of rodents. Part II. Diverse infections in a single rodent community. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004;4: 296–305. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2004.4.296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kosoy MY, Regnery RL, Tzianabos T, Marston EL, Jones DC, Green D, et al. Distribution, diversity, and host specificity of Bartonella in rodents from the Southeastern United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57: 578–588. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Špitalská E, Minichová L, Kocianová E, Škultéty Ľ, Mahríková L, Hamšíková Z, et al. Diversity and prevalence of Bartonella species in small mammals from Slovakia, Central Europe. Parasitol Res. 2017;116: 3087–3095. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5620-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vigil A, Ortega R, Jain A, Nakajima-Sasaki R, Tan X, Chomel BB, et al. Identification of the feline humoral immune response to Bartonella henselae infection by protein microarray. PLoS One. 2010;5: e11447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Québatte M, Dehio C. Bartonella gene transfer agent: Evolution, function, and proposed role in host adaptation. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21: e13068. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Québatte M, Christen M, Harms A, Körner J, Christen B, Dehio C. Gene Transfer Agent Promotes Evolvability within the Fittest Subpopulation of a Bacterial Pathogen. Cell Syst. 2017;4: 611–621.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Traub E. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF LYMPHOCYTIC CHORIOMENINGITIS IN A MOUSE STOCK OBSERVED FOR FOUR YEARS. J Exp Med. 1939;69: 801–817. doi: 10.1084/jem.69.6.801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB. Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature. 1953;172: 603–606. doi: 10.1038/172603a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burnet FM, Fenner, Frank. The production of antibodies. Melbourne: Macmillan; 1949. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Boulouis HJ, Barrat F, Bermond D, Bernex F, Thibault D, Heller R, et al. Kinetics of Bartonella birtlesii infection in experimentally infected mice and pathogenic effect on reproductive functions. Infect Immun. 2001;69: 5313–5317. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5313-5317.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Breitschwerdt EB, Maggi RG, Farmer P, Mascarelli PE. Molecular evidence of perinatal transmission of Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii and Bartonella henselae to a child. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48: 2289–2293. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00326-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Abbott RC, Chomel BB, Kasten RW, Floyd-Hawkins KA, Kikuchi Y, Koehler JE, et al. Experimental and natural infection with Bartonella henselae in domestic cats. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;20: 41–51. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9571(96)00025-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chastant-Maillard S, Boulouis H-J, Reynaud K, Thoumire S, Gandoin C, Bouillin C, et al. Lack of transplacental transmission of Bartonella bovis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;38: 41–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2014.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsai K-N, Kuo C-F, Ou J-HJ. Mechanisms of Hepatitis B Virus Persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26: 33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pircher H, Bürki K, Lang R, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. Tolerance induction in double specific T-cell receptor transgenic mice varies with antigen. Nature. 1989;342: 559–561. doi: 10.1038/342559a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Oxenius A, Bachmann MF, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H. Virus-specific MHC-class II-restricted TCR-transgenic mice: effects on humoral and cellular immune responses after viral infection. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28: 390–400. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beyer M, Abdullah Z, Chemnitz JM, Maisel D, Sander J, Lehmann C, et al. Tumor-necrosis factor impairs CD4(+) T cell-mediated immunological control in chronic viral infection. Nat Immunol. 2016;17: 593–603. doi: 10.1038/ni.3399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baker FD, Hotchin J. Slow virus kidney disease of mice. Science. 1967;158: 502–504. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3800.502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hotchin J, Collins DN. GLOMERULONEPHRITIS AND LATE ONSET DISEASE OF MICE FOLLOWING NEONATAL VIRUS INFECTION. Nature. 1964;203: 1357–1359. doi: 10.1038/2031357a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brown SE, Steward MW, Viola L, Howard CR, Murray-Lyon IM. Chronic liver disease: the detection and characterization of circulating immune complexes. Immunology. 1983;49: 673–683. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rath S, Devey ME. IgG subclass composition of antibodies to HBsAg in circulating immune complexes from patients with hepatitis B virus infections. Clin Exp Immunol. 1988;72: 164–167. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Oldstone MB, Dixon FJ. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis: production of antibody by “tolerant” infected mice. Science. 1967;158: 1193–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3805.1193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Seiler P, Senn BM, Bründler MA, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H, Kalinke U. In vivo selection of neutralization-resistant virus variants but no evidence of B cell tolerance in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus carrier mice expressing a transgenic virus-neutralizing antibody. J Immunol. 1999;162: 4536–4541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Thomsen AR, Volkert M, Marker O. Different isotype profiles of virus-specific antibodies in acute and persistent lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection in mice. Immunology. 1985;55: 213–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fung-Leung WP, Schilham MW, Rahemtulla A, Kündig TM, Vollenweider M, Potter J, et al. CD8 is needed for development of cytotoxic T cells but not helper T cells. Cell. 1991;65: 443–449. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90462-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Guidotti LG, Isogawa M, Chisari FV. Host-virus interactions in hepatitis B virus infection. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;36: 61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sorg I, Schmutz C, Lu Y-Y, Fromm K, Siewert LK, Bögli A, et al. A Bartonella Effector Acts as Signaling Hub for Intrinsic STAT3 Activation to Trigger Anti-inflammatory Responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27: 476–485.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Locksley RM, Scott P. Helper T-cell subsets in mouse leishmaniasis: induction, expansion and effector function. Immunol Today. 1991;12: A58–61. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5699(05)80017-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Harms A, Segers FHID, Quebatte M, Mistl C, Manfredi P, Körner J, et al. Evolutionary Dynamics of Pathoadaptation Revealed by Three Independent Acquisitions of the VirB/D4 Type IV Secretion System in Bartonella. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9: 761–776. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fromm K, Boegli A, Ortelli M, Wagner A, Bohn E, Malmsheimer S, et al. Bartonella taylorii: A model organism for studying Bartonella infection in vitro and in vivo. bioRxiv; 2022. p. 2022.03.11.483615. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.11.483615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schulein R, Dehio C. The VirB/VirD4 type IV secretion system of Bartonella is essential for establishing intraerythrocytic infection. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46: 1053–1067. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03208.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mombaerts P, Iacomini J, Johnson RS, Herrup K, Tonegawa S, Papaioannou VE. RAG-1-deficient mice have no mature B and T lymphocytes. Cell. 1992;68: 869–877. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90030-g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kitamura D, Roes J, Kühn R, Rajewsky K. A B cell-deficient mouse by targeted disruption of the membrane exon of the immunoglobulin μ chain gene. Nature. 1991;350: 423–426. doi: 10.1038/350423a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]