Abstract
Introduction
Civilization development coupled with contemporary lifestyle leads to a systematic increase in postural disorders. An analysis of factors that may provoke postural disorders indicates that such a stimulus may be the diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles. Moreover, abnormal activity of the rectus abdominis muscles may affect balance disorders through reduced spinal stabilization and disturbed body statics. There is an increase in body posture abnormalities between the ages of 6 and 9 related to new school duties.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the shape of the spine and the width of the linea alba in children aged 6–9 years.
Material and Method
The study was designed to evaluate parameters determining the shape of the spine, and the width of the linea alba in healthy children aged 6–9 years. The study participants were divided into two groups based on the width of the linea alba. The study group with the width of the linea alba >10 mm and the control group with the width of the linea alba ≤ 10 mm. The study group were included 37 children and the control group 24 children. The examination of the linea alba width was performed by a radiology specialist using a linear transducer and SAOTE- My Lab Classc-type ultrasound at rest and during contraction of the rectus abdominis muscles. Parameters describing the shape of the spine were measured using the Diers Formetric 4D system: trunk inclination, trunk imbalance, pelvis tilt, pelvic torsion, kyphotic apex, lordotic apex, kyphotic angle, lordotic angle, rotation angle, trunk torsion, lateral deviation. The obtained results were statistically analyzed using a Paired t test for comparison of differences between the results in the study and control groups and Pearson's test to assess the correlation between the width of the linea alba and parameters describing spinal alignment.
Results
In both groups, the parameters describing the shape of the spine did not differ from the norms accepted as typical for the age norm. The only statistically significant difference between the study and control group concerned the trunk inclination, which was negative in the study group, signifying a shift of the entire spine axis backwards beyond the vertical.
Conclusions
There is a correlation between the shape of spine and the width of the linea alba in terms of selected parameters determining the body posture in the sagittal plane, which concern: the position of the lumbar lordotic apex, trunk inclination and the depth of the lumbar lordotic angle. The width of the linea alba is not explicitly related to abnormalities of pelvic and spinal alignment in the frontal and transverse planes.
Keywords: postural defects, linea alba, Diers system, Physiotherapy, children
Introduction
Civilization development coupled with contemporary lifestyle leads to a systematic increase in postural disorders (1). In addition, the abovementioned increase in disorders, and thus deterioration of health in children and adolescents, is influenced by a decrease in physical activity and by exceeding the organism's demand for energy (2). Our own observations, confirmed by the conclusions of other authors, indicate that postural defects are often a consequence of unhealthy daily habits. Thus, the habitual incorrect adoption of a specific body posture affects the formation and consolidation of a faulty body position (3–5). According to some authors, between the ages of 6 and 9 years, there are visible posture abnormalities related to new school duties. It is believed that prolonged sitting at the desk, asymmetrical carrying of backpacks and a small amount of activity oriented on maintaining good posture contribute to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. The abnormalities mainly concern the shape of the spine, the asymmetry of the torso and the work of the muscles (6, 7). Ignoring postural defects at an early stage of development may contribute negatively to the occurrence of health complications at a later stage.
In most children, postural dysfunction (8, 9), which often becomes apparent in the sagittal plane (2, 10–12), is considered to be the cause of these disorders.
An analysis of factors that may provoke postural disorders indicates that such a stimulus may be the diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles (13–15). Moreover, abnormal activity of the rectus abdominis muscles (RA) may affect balance disorders through reduced spinal stabilization and disturbed body statics. In this perspective, it should be emphasized that correct tension of abdominal muscles enables to maintain the organs in the right place and to exert proper pressure on the lumbar region of the spine. This has a preventive role in deepening the lumbar lordosis and increasing the anterior tilt of the pelvis (13–15) and allows the body to maintain a correct posture. From a functional point of view, the linea alba plays an essential part in maintaining the stability of the body posture.
Its tension is regulated by the pyramidal muscles and the rectus abdominis muscles (16). The length of the linea alba (LA) in an adult is ~33 cm, while its width is at least 10 mm (14). The linea alba is running from the xiphoid process of the sternum to the superior pubic ligament. In the structure of linea alba, there are three different zones of fiber orientation: the lamina fibrae obliquae, the lamina fibrae transversae and the small lamina fibrae irregularium. The transverse fibers act as a counterpart to the intraabdominal pressure, whereas the oblique fiber are involved mainly in movements of the trunk (17).
Variability of posture, diversity of body types and variety of standards describing it make it difficult to distinguish between a normal and abnormal posture. Nowadays, a precise and non-invasive examination using computer diagnostic techniques is gaining popularity. Formetric measurement technology allows scanning the topography of the body surface without radiation or the use of markers. Anatomical landmarks, spinous process alignment and vertebral rotations are automatically detected (18–22).
Purpose Of The Study
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the shape of the spine and the width of the linea alba in children aged 6–9 years.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
The study was designed to evaluate parameters determining the shape of the spine, and the width of the linea alba in healthy children aged 6–9 years.
The study participants were divided into two groups based on the width of the linea alba.
- The study group with the width of the linea alba >10 mm
- The control group with the width of the linea alba ≤ 10 mm
The study group consisted of 37 patients of Physiotherapy of the Swietokrzyskie Pediatrics Center in Kielce. The study group included 6 children aged 6 years, 12 children aged 7 years, 9 children aged 8 years and 10 children aged 9 years.
The control group consisted of 24 patients of Physiotherapy of the Świȩtokrzyskie Pediatrics Center in Kielce. The study group included 4 children aged 6 years, 6 children aged 7 years, 6 children aged 8 years, and 8 children aged 9 years.
The sample size is not representative of the total population of children with diastasis linea alba.
The parameters were assessed once during the prophylactic examination. The parameters describing the shape of the spine were obtained using digital photogrammetry. The width of the linea alba in its particular sections was determined with the use of ultrasonography.
Consent of the Bioethics Committee of Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce No. 45/2028 was obtained for the study.
Participants
A total of 61 children (31 boys and 29 girls) were included in the study. Their age ranged from 6 to 9 years.
The level of anthropometric indicators (height, weight, BMI) among the examined children was similar (Tables 1, 2).
Table 1.
Anthropometric indicators among study group.
| Study group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Mediana | Minimum | Maximum | Variance | Standard deviation | |
| Age | 7.62162 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 1.13063 | 1.063311 |
| Weight [kg] | 26.35135 | 25 | 18 | 40 | 30.28979 | 5.503616 |
| Height [m] | 1.23946 | 1.26 | 1.04 | 1.49 | 0.01153 | 0.107366 |
| BMI | 17.05081 | 16.64201 | 13.6048 | 22.27668 | 4.63867 | 2.153756 |
Table 2.
Anthropometric indicators among control group.
| Control group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Mediana | Minimum | Maximum | Variance | Standard deviation | |
| Age | 7.75 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 1.23913 | 1.113162 |
| Weight [kg] | 29.91667 | 28.5 | 22 | 44 | 32.16667 | 5.671567 |
| Height [m] | 1.30458 | 1,285 | 1,18 | 1.46 | 0.00376 | 0.061289 |
| BMI | 17.47931 | 16.92511 | 13.82128 | 22.27668 | 5.48774 | 2.342593 |
The history and medical examination did not reveal any coexisting conditions that could affect the analyzed parameters.
Inclusion criteria:
Age 6–9 years;
No comorbidities that could affect the quality of the results;
Declared consent of the legal guardian to participate in the study;
Defect of posture regarding the enhancement of the abdomen;
Normal body weight;
Good overall health.
Exclusion criteria:
presence of comorbidities that may contribute to body axis abnormalities
lack of consent from the legal guardian to participate in the study such as Scheuermann's disease, genetic conditions such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, or metabolic disease obese and significantly underweight children.
No data are available in the literature regarding norms of the linea alba size in children. The norm values of this parameter for adults are also a matter of dispute (14). Due to the lack of values defining norms of the linea alba width for children, the authors assumed the minimum width of the linea alba of 10 mm in adults to be the anatomical norm (1).
Course of the Study
Ultrasound Examination
The examination of the linea alba width was performed by a radiology specialist using a linear transducer and SAOTE- My Lab Classc-type ultrasound at rest and during contraction of the rectus abdominis muscles.
Measurement of the width of the linea alba at rest:
A. 3 cm above the navel
B. At the level of the navel
C. 2 cm below the navel
Measurement of the width of the linea alba during contraction of the rectus abdominis muscles:
D. 3 cm above the navel
E. At the level of the navel
The width of the linea alba during contraction of the rectus abdominis muscles at a point 2 cm below the navel was not assessed in children due to technical difficulties in conducting this measurement.
Assessment of Shape of Spine
Parameters describing the shape of the spine were measured using the Diers Formetric 4D system. The system acquires parameters to determine posture, back and spine surfaces. It allows to see diverse clinical parameters from an objective and quantitative static analysis of the body (18–23). The following parameters were assessed:
Trunk inclination—the parameter is calculated in mm and represents the deviation of the line connecting VP (the 7th cervical vertebra) and DM (the center of the line joining the right and left anterior superior iliac spine) from the vertical in the sagittal plane (Figure 1).
Trunk imbalance—the parameter is calculated in mm and represents the deviation of the line connecting VP and DM from the vertical in the frontal plane (Figure 2).
Pelvis tilt—the parameter is measured in mm and refers to the difference in height between the lumbar dimples in relation to the horizontal plane (transversal section) (Figure 3).
Pelvic torsion—the parameter is measured in [°] and is calculated from the reciprocal of the torsion of the normal planes at the lumbar dimples points (vertical component) (Figure 4).
Kyphotic apex—posterior apex of the sagittal profile in the upper region, characterized by a vertical tangent (Figure 5).
Lordotic apex—posterior apex of the sagittal profile in the lower region, characterized by a vertical tangent (Figure 6).
Kyphotic angle—the parameter measured in °, this is the angle measured between VP and the estimated position of Th12 (Figure 7).
Lordotic angle—the parameter measured in °, this is the angle measured between the estimated position of Th12 and DM (Figure 8).
Rotation angle—the parameter measured in ° means the maximum rotation of the surface on the line of symmetry (Figure 9).
Trunk torsion—the parameter is calculated from the reciprocal twist of the planes at DM and VP (Figure 10).
Lateral deviation— the parameter is calculated in mm and represents the maximum deviation of the midline of the spine from the VP -DM line in the frontal plane (value at the top of curvature curve) (Figure 11).
Figure 1.
Trunk inclination.
Figure 2.
Trunk imbalance.
Figure 3.
Pelvis tilt.
Figure 4.
Pelvis torsion.
Figure 5.
Kyphotic apex.
Figure 6.
Lordotic apex.
Figure 7.
Kyphotic angle.
Figure 8.
Lordotic angle.
Figure 9.
Rotation angle.
Figure 10.
Trunk torsion.
Figure 11.
Lateral deviation.
Statistical Analysis
The obtained results were statistically analyzed using a Paired t test for comparison of differences between the results in the study and control groups and Pearson's test to assess the correlation between the width of the linea alba and parameters describing spinal alignment. The correlation was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Results
In both groups, the parameters describing the shape of the spine did not differ from the norms accepted as typical for the age norm (23) (Tables 3, 4).
Table 3.
Variables analyzed in the study group.
| Variable | Descriptive statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Average | Minimum | Maximum | Standard deviation | |
| A | 37 | 14.027 | 4.000 | 28.000 | 4.65168 |
| B | 37 | 3.297 | 0.000 | 16.000 | 4.61799 |
| C | 37 | 12.351 | 5.000 | 28.000 | 4.25060 |
| D | 37 | 11.081 | 4.000 | 27.000 | 5.26719 |
| E | 37 | 9.838 | 3.000 | 23.000 | 4.20657 |
| F | 37 | 2.324 | 0.000 | 14.000 | 4.26259 |
| Trunk inclination | 37 | −4.676 | −36.300 | 23.350 | 16.64832 |
| Trunk imbalance | 37 | −4.182 | −25.500 | 19.500 | 9.12077 |
| Pelvis tilt | 37 | −0.041 | −9.000 | 12.000 | 4.49286 |
| Pelvic torsion | 37 | 0.570 | −6.490 | 9.800 | 3.00721 |
| Kyphotic apex | 37 | −101.727 | −153.210 | −12.190 | 32.38426 |
| Lordotic apex | 37 | −275.296 | −422.650 | −176.270 | 43.64524 |
| Kyphotic angle | 37 | 35.201 | 15.430 | 55.900 | 10.02382 |
| Lordotic angle | 37 | 29.270 | 6.000 | 52.560 | 11.92092 |
| Rotation angle | 37 | 4.593 | 1.470 | 9.890 | 1.98316 |
| Trunk torsion | 37 | −0.747 | −21.830 | 11.130 | 6.55998 |
| Lateral deviation | 37 | 4.133 | 0.440 | 10.260 | 2.23784 |
Table 4.
Variables analyzed in the control group.
| Variable | Descriptive statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Average | Minimum | Maximum | Standard deviation | |
| A | 24 | 5.896 | 0.000 | 11.000 | 2.57909 |
| B | 24 | 7.750 | 3.000 | 11.000 | 2.15184 |
| C | 24 | 0.167 | 0.000 | 2.000 | 0.56466 |
| D | 24 | 4.625 | 0.000 | 10.000 | 2.64678 |
| E | 24 | 5.896 | 0.000 | 11.000 | 2.64567 |
| F | 24 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00000 |
| Trunk inclination | 24 | 1.430 | −25.960 | 42.260 | 15.83776 |
| Trunk imbalance | 24 | −4.648 | −16.500 | 4.500 | 5.55857 |
| Pelvis tilt | 24 | −0.474 | −9.000 | 6.000 | 3.48431 |
| Pelvic torsion | 24 | 0.190 | −4.570 | 5.140 | 2.72091 |
| Kyphotic apex | 24 | −105.624 | −152.090 | −45.920 | 28.23539 |
| Lordotic apex | 24 | −271.833 | −331.310 | −211.110 | 34.03374 |
| Kyphotic angle | 24 | 35.460 | 21.000 | 53.670 | 9.06694 |
| Lordotic angle | 24 | 33.876 | 20.530 | 54.280 | 7.49276 |
| Rotation angle | 24 | 4.832 | 1.210 | 10.180 | 2.54246 |
| Trunk torsion | 24 | −0.186 | −16.500 | 7.720 | 5.63733 |
The only statistically significant difference between the study and control group concerned the trunk imbalance, which was negative in the study group, signifying a shift of the entire spine axis backwards beyond the vertical (Table 5).
Table 5.
Comparison of the tested parameters in the study and control group.
| Study group vs. Control group | Paired t test | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Average | T | df | p | N | N | Standard deviation | Standard deviation | Quotient F | p | |
| Trunk inclination (study group) vs. trunk inclination (control group) | −4.67568 | 1.430417 | −1.42603 | 59 | 0.159129 | 37 | 24 | 16.64832 | 15.83776 | 1.104978 | 0.815542 |
| Trunk imbalance (study group) vs. trunk imbalance (control group) | −4.18243 | −4.64833 | 0.224307 | 59 | 0.823294 | 37 | 24 | 9.120765 | 5.558573 | 2.692377 | 0.014669 |
| Pelvis tilt (study group) vs. pelvis tilt (control group) | −0.040541 | −0.47375 | 0.400298 | 59 | 0.690382 | 37 | 24 | 4.492862 | 3.484315 | 1.66269 | 0.201698 |
| Pelvic torsion (study group) vs. pelvic torsion (control group) | 0.57027 | 0.19 | 0.500485 | 59 | 0.618596 | 37 | 24 | 3.007208 | 2.720913 | 1.221512 | 0.621749 |
| Kyphotic apex (study group) vs. kyphotic apex (control group) | −101.727 | −105.624 | 0.48221 | 59 | 0.631441 | 37 | 24 | 32.38426 | 28.23539 | 1.315468 | 0.493961 |
| Lordotic apex (study group) vs. lordotic apex (control group) | −275.296 | −271.833 | −0.32889 | 59 | 0.743405 | 37 | 24 | 43.64524 | 34.03374 | 1.644578 | 0.211527 |
| Kyphotic angle (study group) vs. kyphotic angle (control group) | 35.20081 | 35.46 | −0.10235 | 59 | 0.918826 | 37 | 24 | 10.02382 | 9.066941 | 1.222208 | 0.620711 |
| Lordotic angle (study group) vs. lordotic angle (control group) | 29.27027 | 33.87625 | −1.68639 | 59 | 0.097003 | 37 | 24 | 11.92092 | 7.492761 | 2.531256 | 0.021673 |
| Rotation angle (study group) vs. rotation angle (control group) | 4.592973 | 4.831667 | −0.4106 | 59 | 0.682856 | 37 | 24 | 1.983164 | 2.542456 | 1.643576 | 0.176958 |
| Trunk torsion (study group) vs. trunk torsion (control group) | −0.746757 | −0.18625 | −0.34401 | 59 | 0.732063 | 37 | 24 | 6.559982 | 5.637334 | 1.354122 | 0.448365 |
| Lateral deviation (study group) vs. lateral deviation (control group) | 4.132703 | 3.205833 | 1.737435 | 59 | 0.087528 | 37 | 24 | 2.237836 | 1.670011 | 1.795633 | 0.142173 |
Correlations between the width of the linea alba and parameters describing posture in the study group were analyzed (Table 6). Nine statistically significant correlations were obtained, but they were of weak strength. They concerned relationships of the linea alba width with trunk inclination, the position of the lumbar lordotic apex, the depth of the thoracic kyphotic angle and the depth of the lumbar lordotic angle.
Table 6.
Correlations between the linea alba width and parameters describing body posture in the study group.
| Variable | Correlations p < 0.05000 N> = 37 (Missing data were removed on a case-by-case basis) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| Trunk inclination | −0.112676 | 0.130503 | −0.370781 | 0.008384 | 0.093479 | −0.353528 |
| Trunk imbalance | −0.098193 | −0.018807 | 0.020726 | −0.123936 | −0.055411 | 0.098805 |
| Pelvis tilt | 0.251258 | 0.170947 | 0.267691 | 0.172692 | 0.070191 | 0.203043 |
| Pelvic torsion | −0.141187 | −0.073611 | −0.307622 | −0.038162 | −0.011635 | −0.354746 |
| Kyphotic apex | 0.037788 | −0.247535 | 0.223897 | −0.214208 | −0.266756 | 0.204840 |
| Lordotic apex | −0.219095 | −0.308676 | 0.171668 | −0.432927 | −0.340759 | 0.163954 |
| Kyphotic angle | 0.157471 | 0.361884 | 0.010262 | 0.284204 | 0.411823 | −0.008113 |
| Lordotic angle | 0.254027 | 0.175422 | 0.241337 | 0.350601 | 0.328363 | 0.257998 |
| Rotation angle | −0.181008 | 0.228399 | 0.150373 | −0.184044 | 0.157057 | 0.164511 |
| Trunk torsion | 0.233771 | 0.267357 | 0.144211 | 0.117727 | 0.101356 | 0.143358 |
| Lateral deviation | −0.188987 | −0.012192 | −0.224226 | −0.076067 | −0.054837 | −0.178485 |
Correlations between the width of the linea alba and parameters describing posture in the control group were analyzed (Table 7). Two statistically significant correlations of moderate strength were obtained. They concerned the relationship between the depth of lumbar lordosis and the width of the linea alba at the level of the navel at rest and during abdominal muscle tension.
Table 7.
Correlations between the linea alba width and parameters describing body posture in the control group.
| Variable | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trunk inclination | 0.045553 | 0.004864 | −0.140123 | 0.052305 | −0.010214 |
| Trunk imbalance | −0.264158 | −0.245250 | 0.216004 | −0.212821 | −0.229070 |
| Pelvis tilt | −0.016036 | 0.227070 | −0.090715 | 0.036473 | 0.230852 |
| Pelvic torsion | 0.049937 | 0.234806 | −0.046410 | 0.002143 | 0.318781 |
| Kyphotic apex | −0.147227 | 0.016963 | 0.371796 | −0.210773 | 0.084516 |
| Lordotic apex | −0.208355 | 0.119822 | 0.222427 | −0.268501 | 0.232216 |
| Kyphotic angle | −0.019085 | −0.257986 | −0.230141 | 0.025382 | −0.346612 |
| Lordotic angle | −0.163330 | −0.654746 | −0.292314 | −0.063751 | −0.642664 |
| Rotation angle | −0.078246 | 0.272426 | −0.326677 | 0.045163 | 0.209097 |
| Trunk torsion | −0.195635 | −0.048019 | 0.107699 | −0.267503 | −0.055244 |
| Lateral deviation | −0.161214 | −0.041801 | −0.071158 | 0.028452 | −0.083944 |
Discussion
Currently, the increasingly recognized postural disorders among children are particularly severe in the sagittal plane and characterized by an abnormal shape of the spine (24). These abnormalities often contribute to the disruption of muscle tone throughout the body (25). According to the law of tensegrity, symptoms of abnormal tension can be seen even at distant locations from their source (25). Own research has not shown a strong correlation between the width of the linea alba and the resting position of the pelvis and spine in the frontal and transverse planes, but only with the depth of lumbar lordosis and, to a lesser extent, the depth of thoracic kyphosis.
In own observations, a relationship between abdominal muscle work and lumbar spine alignment was noted. These findings may be related to the posterior shift of the body axis demonstrated in children with diastasis musculorum rectorum. The abdominal muscles are important stabilizers of the spine, and their poor coordination, visible in diastasis musculorum rectorum, may contribute to chronic lower spine pain (26). In their original study, Doubkova et al. demonstrated a relationship between diastasis musculorum rectorum and chronic spinal pain (26).
The data obtained in the test group showed that the posterior shift of the body axis contributes to the shift of lumbar lordotic apex, whose position, as shown by own research, correlates statistically significantly with the width of the linea alba in children in the study group and may cause overloading of spinal joints in this segment. Our own study also showed a difference in body posture, which was the extent of trunk inclination. In the study group, this parameter was negative, meaning shifting of the whole trunk backwards. Shifting the whole trunk backwards in relation to the body axis requires constant tension of abdominal muscles, necessary to maintain the vertical position. Similar tension should accompany lateral flexion (27), however, our own study does not confirm a correlation of the width of the linea alba with the position of the spine in the frontal plane.
Studies have also failed to show strong correlations of spinal and pelvic alignment with diastasis musculorum rectorum in a static position. According to Benjamin et al., diastasis musculorum rectorum may be associated with lumbo-pelvic instability and pelvic floor weakness (28). Furthermore, when abdominal pressure is elevated for a prolonged period of time, the linea alba dilates (14).
In the conducted study, a statistically significant correlation was identified between the width of the linea alba at the level of the navel and 3 cm above during tension of the rectus abdominis muscle and the position of the lumbar lordotic apex in children from the study group. According to the literature, abdominal muscles such as rectus abdominis, external oblique and internal oblique muscles belong to global stabilizers, which are not the only stabilizing system in this region of the body. There is also a system of local stabilizers in the L-S segment (29). Some authors report that diastasis musculorum rectorum and weakening of the connections between the abdominal muscles can lead to a reduction in abdominal pressure and pressure on the vertebrae supplied by the thoracic fascia. Over time, the center of gravity shifts toward the lower part along the spine, increasing the pressure on the intervertebral discs and causing pain (30).
In the present study, a correlation between the width of the linea alba and the depth of lumbar lordosis was demonstrated in both the study and control groups. Similar results were described by Yalfani et al. investigating the correlation of lumbar lordosis size and the width of the linea alba (31). The correlations observed in own study were statistically significant, but characterized by moderate strength. The strength of the mentioned correlations indicates the existence of at least one more factor affecting the depth of lumbar lordosis and it may be the efficiency of local stabilizers. However, this thesis requires further research.
It should be emphasized that the correlation between the width of the linea alba and the depth of lumbar lordosis is greater in the group where the linea alba had a smaller width. This may indicate the presence of complex dysfunctions in the stabilization system in persons with diastasis musculorum rectorum.
In our own study, in the study group the width of linea alba correlated with both the kyphotic angle and the lordotic angle, while in the control group this correlation occurred only in relation to the lumbar lordosis. Temel et al. describes significant changes in the size of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis in patients undergoing surgical reduction of diastasis musculorum rectorum confirming the influence of this structure on the shape of the spine in the sagittal plane (32).
Limitations Of The Studies
It is not possible to determine the chronology of events on the basis of the cited studies, whether the dysfunction of the linea alba affects the change in the depth of lumbar lordosis through a change in abdominal muscle tone, or whether abdominal muscle disorders cause the rectus abdominis muscle diastasis and changes in the shape of the lower spine. The authors see a need for further research in this area. Further studies should investigate the contractile activity of individual abdominal muscles and be conducted on a larger population divided into body weight centile ranges.
Clinical Implications
As shown in the presented results, there is a significant correlation between the width of the linea alba and the depth of lumbar lordosis, this relationship can be used in building a treatment procedure for patients with linea alba diastesis.
Conclusions
There is a correlation between the shape of spine and the width of the linea alba in terms of selected parameters determining the body posture in the sagittal plane, which concern: the position of the lumbar lordotic apex, trunk inclination and the depth of the lumbar lordotic angle.
The width of the linea alba is not explicitly related to abnormalities of pelvic and spinal alignment in the frontal and transverse planes.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Consent of the Bioethics Committee of Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce No. 45/2018 was obtained for the study. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.
Author Contributions
AZm, AŻu, WK, and ZŚ contributed to conception and design of the study. AZm, AŻu, TR, and JP organized the database. AŻu performed the statistical analysis. AZm and AŻu wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AZm, AŻu, ZŚ, GŚ, and ZŚ wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This project was financed under the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education called Regional Initiative of Excellence in the years, project no 024/RID/2018/19, amount of financing 11 999 000,00 PLN. The funders had no influence on the way the research was conducted, the content of the publication or the final conclusions.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Janiszewska R, Tuzinek S, Nowak S, Ratyńska A, Biniaszewski T. Abnormalities of posture in 6-12 year-old children – pupils of primary schools from Radom – a pilot study. Probl Hig Epidemiol. (2009) 90:342–6. Available online at: http://phie.pl/phe.php?opc=AR&lng=pl&art=334 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Perriman DM, Scarvell JM, Hughes AR, Lueck CJ, Dear KB, Smith PN. Thoracic hyperkyphosis: a survey of Australian physiotherapists. Physiother Res Int. (2012) 17:167–78. 10.1002/pri.529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Górecki A, Kiwerski J, Kowalski J, Marczyński W, Nowotny J, Rybicka M. Prophylactics of postural deformities in children and youth carried out within the teaching environment – experts recommendations. Pol Ann Med. (2009) 16:168–77. Available online at: http://wmil.home.pl/rocznik/files/files/168_177_rocznik_gorecki.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 4.Latalski M, Bylina J, Fatyga M, Repko M, Filipovic M, Jarosz MJ, et al. Risk factors of postural defects in children at school age. Ann Agric Environ Med. (2013) 20:583–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zmyślna A, Kiebzak W, Zurawski A, Pogorzelska J, Kotela I, Kowalski TJ, et al. Effect of physiotherapy on spinal alignment in children with postural defects. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. (2019) 32:25–32. 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brzek A, Dworrak T, Strauss M, Sanchis-Gomar F, Sabbah I, Dworrak B, et al. The weight of pupils' schoolbags in early school age and its influence on body posture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2017) 18:117. 10.1186/s12891-017-1462-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walicka-Cupryś K, Skalska-Izdebska R, Rachwał M, Truszczyńska A. Influence of the weight of a school backpack on spinal curvature in the sagittal plane of seven-year-old children. Biomed Res Int. (2015) 2015:817913. 10.1155/2015/817913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maciałczyk-Paprocka K, Krzyzaniak A, Kotwicki T, Kałuzny Ł, Przybylski J. The body posture of preschool children. Probl Hig Epidemiol. (2011) 92:286–90. Available online at: http://phie.pl/pdf/phe-2011/phe-2011-2-286.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maciałczyk-Paprocka K, Krzyzaniak A, Kotwicki T, Sowińska A, StawińskaWitoszyńska B, Krzywińska-Wiewiorowska M, et al. Postural defects in primary school students in Poznan. Probl Hig Epidemiol. (2012) 93:309–314. Available online at: http://www.phie.pl/pdf/phe-2012/phe-2012-2-309.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 10.Radzevičiene L, Kazlauskas A. Posture disorders and their causes in rural schools pupils. Soc Welf Interdiscipl Approach. (2016) 1:118–25. 10.21277/sw.v1i6.241 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gogola A, Saulicz E, Kuszewski M, Matyja M, Myśliwiec A. Development of low postural tone compensatory patterns - predicted dysfunction patterns in upper part of the body. Dev Period Med. (2014) 18:380–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zurawski AŁ, Kiebzak WP, Kowalski IM, Sliwiński G, Sliwiński Z. Evaluation of the association between postural control and sagittal curvature of the spine. PloS ONE. (2020) 15:e0241228. 10.1371/journal.pone.0241228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Opala-Berdzik A, Dabrowski S. Physiotherapy in diastasis of the rectus muscles of abdomen in women during pregnancy and postpartum. Fizjoterapia. (2009) 17:67–70. 10.2478/v10109-010-0039-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, Manestar M, Mihic-Probst D, Weber SA, et al. The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women. Clin Anat. (2009) 22:706–11. 10.1002/ca.20836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hilgert T, Bagłaj M. Rare abdominal hernias in children. Adv Clin Exp Med. (2006) 15:733–40. Available online at: https://dbc-webapp-2.dbc.wroc.pl/Content/1748/z23.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 16.Michalska A, Rokita W, Wolder D, Pogorzelska J, Kaczmarczyk K. Diastasis recti abdominis - a review of treatment methods. Ginekol Pol. (2018) 89:97–101. 10.5603/GP.a2018.0016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Axer H, Keyserlingk DG, Prescher A. Collagen fibers in linea alba and rectus sheaths. I. General scheme and morphological aspects. J Surg Res. (2001) 96:127–34. 10.1006/jsre.2000.6070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mangone M, Raimondi P, Paoloni M, Pellanera S, Di Michele A, Di Renzo S, et al. Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography. Eur Spine J. (2013) 22:367–71. 10.1007/s00586-012-2564-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sliwiński Z, Kufel W, Halat B, Michalak B, Sliwińska D, Sliwiński G. Analysis of body posture of children with idiopathic scoliosis in the image Diers after the application of kinesiology taping application. Scoliosis. (2014) 9:P15. 10.1186/1748-7161-9-S1-P15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ksiazek-Czekaj A, Wiecheć M, Sliwiński G, Sliwiński Z. Monitoring of scoliosis improvement results using the DIERS system. Fizjoterapia Pol. (2016) 16:124134. Available online at: https://fizjoterapiapolska.pl/en/article/monitorowanie-wynikow-usprawniania-skolioz-za-pomoca-systemu-diers-monitoring-the-results-of-scoliosis-improvement-using-the-diers-system/ [Google Scholar]
- 21.Degenhardt B, Starks Z, Bhatia S, Franklin GA. Appraisal of the DIERS method for calculating postural measurements: an observational study. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. (2017) 12:28. 10.1186/s13013-017-0134-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Roman I, Luyten M, Croonenborghs H, Lason G, Peeters L, Byttebier G, et al. Relating the Diers formetric measurements with the subjective severity of acute and chronic low back pain. Med Hypotheses. (2019) 133:109390. 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Harzmann HCh. The value of the video scanning stereogram as a screening method of scoliosis and structural scoliosis [dissertation]. München: Ludwig-MaximiliansUniversity, Faculty of Medicine; (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kluszczyński M, Czernicki J, Kubacki J. Ocena plurimetryczna zmian krzywizn kregosłupa w płaszczyznie strzałkowej w 10 letniej obserwacji u dzieci i młodziezy. Adv Rehabil. (2014) 2:5–12. 10.2478/rehabilitacja-2014-0008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Myers TW, Myers TW. Anatomy Trains E-Book: Myofascial Meridians for Manual and Movement Therapists. Elsevier Health Sciences (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Doubkova L, Andel R, Palascakova-Springrova I, Kolar P, Kriz J, Kobesova A. Diastasis of rectus abdominis muscles in low back pain patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. (2018) 31:107–12. 10.3233/BMR-169687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tesh KM, Dunn JS, Evans JH. The abdominal muscles and vertebral stability. Spine. (1987) 12:501–8. 10.1097/00007632-198706000-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Benjamin DR, van de Water AT, Peiris Cl. Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. (2014) 100:1–8. 10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bergmark A . Stability of the lumbar spine: a study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. (1989) 60:1–54. 10.3109/17453678909154177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.O'Sullivan P, Twomey L, Allison G, Sinclair J, Miller K, Knox J. Altered patterns of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. (1997) 43:91–8. 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60403-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yalfani A, Gandomi F, Anvari R, Gandomi F. Comparison of static, dynamic balance and curvature of the spine in women with and without diastasis recti abdominal in the postpartum period. Nurs Mid J. (2020) 18:84–94. Available online at: https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=798286 [Google Scholar]
- 32.Temel M, Türkmen A, Berberoglu Ö. Improvements in vertebral-column angles and psychological metrics after abdominoplasty with rectus plication. Aesthetic Surg J. (2016) 36:577–87. 10.1093/asj/sjv257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.