Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2022 May 9;18(5):e1010190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010190

Mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1 develop inflammatory kidney disease with glomerular dysfunction

Dusanka Milenkovic 1, Adrián Sanz-Moreno 2, Julia Calzada-Wack 2, Birgit Rathkolb 2,3,4, Oana Veronica Amarie 2, Raffaele Gerlini 2,4, Antonio Aguilar-Pimentel 2, Jelena Misic 5, Marie-Lune Simard 1, Eckhard Wolf 3, Helmut Fuchs 2, Valerie Gailus-Durner 2, Martin Hrabě de Angelis 2,4,6,*, Nils-Göran Larsson 5,*
Editor: Carlos T Moraes7
PMCID: PMC9119528  PMID: 35533204

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) maintenance disorders are caused by mutations in ubiquitously expressed nuclear genes and lead to syndromes with variable disease severity and tissue-specific phenotypes. Loss of function mutations in the gene encoding the mitochondrial genome and maintenance exonuclease 1 (MGME1) result in deletions and depletion of mtDNA leading to adult-onset multisystem mitochondrial disease in humans. To better understand the in vivo function of MGME1 and the associated disease pathophysiology, we characterized a Mgme1 mouse knockout model by extensive phenotyping of ageing knockout animals. We show that loss of MGME1 leads to de novo formation of linear deleted mtDNA fragments that are constantly made and degraded. These findings contradict previous proposal that MGME1 is essential for degradation of linear mtDNA fragments and instead support a model where MGME1 has a critical role in completion of mtDNA replication. We report that Mgme1 knockout mice develop a dramatic phenotype as they age and display progressive weight loss, cataract and retinopathy. Surprisingly, aged animals also develop kidney inflammation, glomerular changes and severe chronic progressive nephropathy, consistent with nephrotic syndrome. These findings link the faulty mtDNA synthesis to severe inflammatory disease and thus show that defective mtDNA replication can trigger an immune response that causes age-associated progressive pathology in the kidney.

Author summary

We have addressed the controversy of the role of the mitochondrial genome and maintenance exonuclease 1 (MGME1) in mtDNA metabolism by characterization of knockout mice. Our findings show that loss of MGME1 leads to increased de novo formation of linear deleted mtDNA, thus contradicting previous report that MGME1 degrades long linear mtDNA molecules. In addition, we report that loss of MGME1 leads to age-associated pathology manifested as progressive weight loss, cataract and retinopathy. Aged knockout mice also develop kidney inflammation leading to glomerular changes, fibrosis and nephrotic syndrome. Defective mtDNA replication causing the formation of linear deleted mtDNA can thus trigger an immune response that leads to the development of progressive kidney disease in ageing animals.

Introduction

Impaired replication or maintenance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) lead to mitochondrial diseases, a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of multisystemic disorders affecting various organs [1,2]. Defects in mtDNA can be either quantitative, causing mtDNA depletion, or qualitative, causing accumulation of deletions and/or point mutations of mtDNA. The expression of mtDNA is completely dependent on nuclear genes that encode proteins that are synthesized in the cytosol and imported into the mitochondrial matrix [3]. At least two hundred nucleus-encoded proteins are needed for maintenance, replication and transcription of mtDNA, as well as biogenesis of mitochondrial ribosomes [4]. The basic components of the mtDNA replication machinery are known and mutations in the catalytic and accessory subunits of mitochondrial DNA polymerase (POLγA and POLγB) [5, 6] the replicative DNA helicase (TWNK) [7], the mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSBP1) [8] and the mitochondrial genome and maintenance exonuclease 1 (MGME1) [9,10], cause mutations and/or depletion of mtDNA, which, in turn, impair mitochondrial function and cause mitochondrial disease syndromes. According to one model supported by biochemical data, MGME1 is a mitochondrial nuclease that processes newly replicated 5’ DNA ends to facilitate ligation when mtDNA synthesis is completed [9,1113]. Based on studies in cell lines, an additional function for MGME1 in degradation of long linear mtDNA fragments was proposed [14]. Both models predict that the absence of MGME1 will lead to the formation of long linear deleted mtDNA molecules, but due to different mechanisms, i.e. increased formation or decreased degradation, respectively.

Loss of function mutations in the MGME1 gene cause human disease syndromes with mtDNA depletion and accumulation of mtDNA rearrangements (MIM#615084) [9,10]. Affected patients develop a range of symptoms in various organs, including brain, skeletal muscle, heart and gastrointestinal organs [9,10]. The majority of the patients develop adult onset disease, but onset in childhood has also been described [10]. We recently generated Mgme1 knockout mice and found that they had prominent mtDNA replication aberrations manifested as replication stalling, mtDNA depletion, formation of long linear deleted molecules and an increase of short single stranded DNA products caused by prematurely aborted replication. In our initial characterization, we established that Mgme1 knockout mice were born at Mendelian proportions and had no obvious changes in gross appearance up until one year of age [13]. Consistent with our results, the international mouse phenotyping consortium project (https://www.mousephenotype.org/data/genes/MGI:1921778#section-associations) revealed only minor changes in an independent Mgme1 knockout mouse strain analyzed at the age of 10 weeks. Because humans with MGME1 mutations typically develop late-onset-mitochondrial disease [9,12], we decided to characterize ageing cohorts of Mgme1 knockout mice by an extensive phenotypic analysis, including clinical chemistry (haematology, metabolism and organ function), energy metabolism (indirect calorimetry, body composition), evaluation of different organ systems, immune system characterization and pathological assessment of tissue changes. We report here that Mgme1 knockout mice show reduced weight gain during aging and even weight loss later in life. In addition, the Mgme1 knockout mice develop cataracts and retinopathy at 65–70 weeks of age. Strikingly, aged mice also develop kidney inflammation, glomerular changes and chronic progressive nephropathy with albuminuria, and die prematurely at ~70 weeks of age. Our findings provide a direct link between defective mtDNA replication and ageing-associated inflammation.

Results

Mgme1 knockout mice have a shorter life span

Cohorts of wild-type and Mgme1-/- animals of both sexes were aged, and their body weights were monitored every four weeks starting from eight weeks of age (Figs 1 and S1). We initially planned to perform the standard late-adult screening pipeline by phenotyping Mgme1 knockout mice from the age of 71 weeks and onwards (www.mouseclinic.de) [15]. However, as the Mgme1-/- mice aged, we noticed that animals started to die prematurely from ~50 weeks of age (Figs 1A and S1A). The cause of death could not be determined at that time because the animals were found dead in their cages without previous obvious deterioration of their general condition. Because of the high attrition rate at the age of 68 weeks, we decided to start the examination of the ageing Mgme1-/- mice earlier than initially planned. Due to animal welfare reasons, we decided to perform a modified phenotyping protocol with combined neurological and morphological examinations, cardiovascular monitoring, body composition measurements and a final blood sampling followed by pathological analyses, as described in S1 Table.

Fig 1. MGME1 deficiency leads to shorter life span in mice.

Fig 1

(A) High attrition rate was observed in older Mgme1-/- animals. p = 0.0008 Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. 19 from 27 mutant and 6 from 30 control animals did not reach the end of phenotyping protocol. (B) Mgme1 knockout mice do not gain weight as they age compared with controls and show progressive weight loss at the later time points, * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001 Unpaired Mann-Whitney Test. (C) Body weight measured at 68 weeks of age of n = 4 wild-type and 3 Mgme1-/- females and 6 wild-type and 5 Mgme1-/- males. Fat mass is indicated as percent of body weight. Values are given as mean ± SD, ** P ≤ 0.01. Unpaired Mann-Whitney Test.

MGME1 deficiency results in body weight decline

Both female and male Mgme1-/- animals showed progressive weight loss (Fig 1B). We detected a significantly decreased body weight compared to controls in male Mgme1-/- animals from week 28, and in females Mgme1-/- from week 52 (Fig 1B). We performed non-invasive qNMR scans to determine body composition and noted significantly decreased fat content in percent of body weight and decreased adiposity index in male Mgme1-/- mice compared to wild-type controls (Figs 1C and S1B). Conversely, the lean mass proportion of male knockout animals was significantly increased (S1B Fig).

MGME1 is not essential for degradation of linear mtDNA fragments

In addition to its established role in the processing of DNA flaps, MGME1 has been suggested to act together with POLγA and TWINKLE as a component of an enzymatic machinery that can degrade linear mtDNA fragments [14,16,17]. Different tissues of Mgme1-/- mice contain substantial amounts of linear subgenomic fragments [13]. If impaired degradation explains the presence of these deleted molecules, they would be predicted to accumulate over time. Using Southern blot analysis, we quantified the amount of linear deleted molecules relative to total mtDNA in young (~10 weeks) and old animals (~50 weeks), but found no accumulation of the linear deleted mtDNA with age in liver, kidney, heart, skeletal muscle and brain (Figs 2A and S2A–S2E) of Mgme1-/- mice. These findings argue that the persistence of linear deleted mtDNA is not due to deficient degradation, but is rather explained by a constant formation of deleted molecules due to defective mtDNA replication. To further investigate this issue, we performed in organello mtDNA replication experiments with pulse/chase labelling to visualize both formation and stability of linear deleted mtDNA in the absence of MGME1 (Fig 2B). With this experimental setup, we monitored de novo formation of linear deleted mtDNA fragments and found that they were degraded although MGME1 was absent. The findings in ageing Mgme1-/- mice (Fig 2A) and characterization of in organello mtDNA replication in mitochondria lacking MGME1 (Fig 2B) thus show that increased formation of linear deleted mtDNA occurs when MGME1 is absent. In addition, Southern blot analyses of full-length mtDNA and total mtDNA (full-length + linear deleted mtDNA) in heart and kidney of Mgme1-/- mice revealed clear mtDNA depletion accompanied by increased levels of 7S DNA (Figs 2C and 2D, S3A and S3B). However, also these phenotypes were not aggravated with age, consistent with mtDNA replication defect in the Mgme1-/- mice.

Fig 2. Linear deleted subgenomic fragments do not accumulate with age in Mgme1-/- mice.

Fig 2

(A) Southern blot quantification of linear deletion fragment signal in ratio to total mtDNA signal in liver, kidney,heart, skeletal muscle and brain of Mgme1-/- mice at 10 and 50 weeks of age. Error bars represent SD. (B) De novo DNA synthesis in heart mitochondria isolated from control (+/+) and Mgme1 knockout (-/-) mice. Mitochondria were pulse labeled (p) for 2 h and the chase was performed for 1 and 3 h. SDHA and VDAC levels on western blot represent loading control for the input mitochondria. (C) Quantification of full length mtDNA (left panel), total mtDNA (middle panel) and 7S DNA (right panel) in wild-type and MGME1 knock-out heart tissue of young (10 weeks) and old (55 weeks) animals. Values are given as mean ± SD. * P ≤ 0.05, T-test. (D) As (C) but in kidney tissue.

Altered lens and retina morphology in eye tissue of Mgme1-/- mice

Histological analysis of eye tissue sections from Mgme1-/- mice showed alterations of the lens matrix structure (Fig 3A and 3B). In wild-type lenses, the epithelial cells are arranged in a monolayer under the lens capsule without gaps or derangement of adjacent fiber cells. The lens matrix of the Mgme1-/- mice contained migrated epithelial cells and the normally densely packed and regularly arranged fiber cells in the lens matrix were swollen and abnormally arranged (Fig 3C). All retinal layers were present in Mgme1 knockout mice, but the total retinal thickness as well as the thickness of each of the three retinal layers, i.e., outer plexiform layer (OPL), inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) near the optic nerve was reduced in the Mgme1-/- mice (Fig 3D and 3E).

Fig 3. Mgme1-/- eye tissue histology images show clear alterations of lens and retina morphology.

Fig 3

(A) Sections through the Mgme1+/+ and (B) the Mgme1-/- eye, indicate at first glance alterations of the lens matrix structure (*); (C) enlarged Mgme1-/- anterior lens image reveals alterations of the lens fiber cells: they are swollen and disorganized (*), affecting the stability of the whole lens matrix. Additionally changes are present as to the epithelial cell monolayer, located underneath the lens capsule, shown here as an accumulation of epithelial cells that seem to make place for invaginations of the lens capsular material (arrow). (D) Retinal layers near ON images show an arbitrary thickness evaluation of some of the layers as rectangles (rectangle a—INL, rectangle b—ONL, rectangle c—OPL) in their ‘control’ size that in E. are placed over the Mgme1-/- retinal layers, to indicate the reduction in all three layers. Abbreviations: INL—inner nuclear layer, ONL—outer nuclear layer, OPL—outer plexiform layer, ON—optic nerve.

MGME1 deficiency causes kidney inflammation and nephropathy

Measurement of cytokines in plasma revealed increased levels of IL-6, TNF- α, Kc/Gro, IL-2, IL-10 and IFN- γ in Mgme1-/- knockout animals (Fig 4), consistent with ongoing inflammation. The results of the clinical chemistry screening revealed marked increases of plasma creatinine and urea levels in ageing Mgme1-/- mice, indicative of a severely impaired renal function (Fig 5A). Urea and creatinine as well as cholesterol levels were significantly increased in male mutants (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test p = 0.004), whereas female mutants showed a non-significant trend towards an increase. The plasma albumin concentration was lower in mutant mice of both sexes (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, over all genotype effect p = 0.036). The slightly decreased plasma albumin and clearly increased plasma cholesterol concentrations represented typical alterations that hint towards significant renal protein loss, as seen in nephrotic syndrome (Fig 5A, S2 Table). In addition, we found altered electrolyte levels in mutant animals with elevated sodium and potassium levels (WRST over all genotype effect p = 0.04 and p = 0.014, respectively) and decreased chloride concentration in males (WRST males p = 0.004). The calcium/phosphate (Ca, Pi) ratio was increased in mutant animals, due to increased calcium levels (WRST over all p = 0.003), and this alteration was associated with significantly increased alkaline phosphatase activity (WRST over all p = 0.001) consistent with significant effects on mineral balance with effects on bone metabolism in mutant animals (S2 Table). The nephrotic syndrome is typically caused by damage of the kidney glomeruli and we therefore performed a more detailed pathohistological analysis of the kidney. Lesions compatible with chronic progressive nephropathy, a common age-related disease in rodents [18], were obvious in all 68-week-old male (5 out of 5) and most female (2 out of 3) Mgme1-/- mice analyzed at the end of the GMC pipeline (Fig 5B–5D). This pathology was also observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stainings of renal sections from all prematurely dead Mgme1-/- mice where histology was performed (3 females and 2 males). No signs of chronic progressive nephropathy were detected in any of the 10 control animals studied (4 females and 6 males). H&E and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stainings revealed glomerular changes with mesangial expansion, abundant hyaline proteinaceous casts and lymphocytic immune infiltrates in the kidneys of Mgme1-/- mice (Fig 5B). Generalized tubulointerstitial fibrosis was also evident in knockout mice after Sirius Red staining (Fig 5C). A portion of the glomeruli from knockout animals was also positive in the Sirius Red staining, pointing to a partial glomerulosclerosis. A more detailed characterization of the renal immune infiltrates by immunohistochemistry demonstrated the presence of both T and B cells (Fig 5D). Interestingly, the overall steady-state levels of OXPHOS proteins and OXPHOS complexes did not change in kidneys of old (55 weeks) Mgme1-/- mice (S4A–S4C Fig), but COX deficient cells were demonstrated by Nitrotetrazolium blue exclusion assay (NBTx) enzyme histochemistry (S4D Fig) in kidney sections from four of five analysed mutant animals. These results show that loss of MGME1 causes glomerular changes and kidney inflammation ultimately leading to severe chronic progressive nephropathy and possible death due to renal failure.

Fig 4. Measurement of cytokines.

Fig 4

Multiplex measurement of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α, KC/GRO, IL-2, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-4 and IL-1b was performed in plasma of control and Mgme1-/- mice. Aged Mgme1-/- mice accumulate several proinflammatory cytokines in plasma.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Mgme1-/- mice display altered renal function and a severe nephropathy (A) Plasma urea, creatinine, cholesterol and albumin levels of ad libitum fed mice at 68 weeks of age; n = 4 WT and 3 Mgme1-/- females and 6 WT and 5 Mgme1-/- males. The median is shown as a line. ** P ≤ 0.01 (B) Representative pictures of PAS (Periodic acid-Schiff) stainings of kidney sections from control and Mgme1-/- mice. Multifocal hyaline proteinaceous casts (indicated with white arrows) and lymphocytic immune infiltrates (indicated with an asterisk) were found in the kidneys of Mgme1-/- animals (lower central panel). PAS-positive mesangial matrix expansion (indicated with black arrows) was obvious in many glomeruli of knockout mice as shown at higher magnification (lower panel, right). (C) Representative pictures of Sirius Red stainings at different magnifications show pronounced tubulointerstitial fibrosis in the kidneys of knockout mice. (D) Immune infiltrates in the kidneys of Mgme1-/- animals were composed mainly by T and B cells, as demonstrated by CD3 and CD45R/B220 immunohistochemistry, respectively.

Discussion

In this study we report a detailed phenotypic characterization of mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1. Despite having clear aberrations in mtDNA, young Mgme1 knockout animals are healthy and fertile without apparent morphological alterations [13]. However, weight loss and functional changes of multiple organs become apparent as the animals age. Lack of the MGME1 protein alters body composition and causes a reduction in fat mass. There are also pathological changes of the lens and the retina. Most importantly, mutant animals develop a severe kidney pathology with glomerular changes, tubulointerstitial fibrosis and inflammation ultimately leading to a nephrotic syndrome coupled with reduced life span.

The mtDNA maintenance diseases are genetically and clinically heterogenous with severities ranging from infantile fatal forms to adult onset of mild disease. Whereas organs with high energy demands, such as heart, skeletal muscle and the central nervous system, often are affected, manifestations can occur in many different organs [19]. Kidneys contain a high density of mitochondria, particularly in the cortical tubules, but all sections of the nephron may be affected by mitochondrial dysfunction. Proximal tubulopathy (Fanconi syndrome) is a common renal phenotype frequently seen in early-onset mitochondrial disease patients, whereas glomerular disease is more frequent in adults [20]. Human patients with MGME1 deficiency were reported to have an adult onset, multisystem mitochondrial disorder including progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO), muscle wasting, muscle weakness, exercise intolerance, cerebellar atrophy, cerebellar ataxia and cardiomyopathy [9]. With regard to kidney-related phenotypes, those patients were reported to develop nephrolithiasis [9]. Also, mitochondrial dysfunction has been linked to chronic kidney disease in humans [21]. Interestingly, some end-stage alterations in human chronic kidney disease are similar to those in rodents, e.g. proteinuria, tubular atrophy, scarring, as well as increases of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine levels [22].

MGME1 deficiency in patients and mice leads to high levels of a linear deleted mtDNA fragment in many different tissues, but the involved mechanisms are much debated. To address this question, we used Mgme1-/- knockout mice [13] to study linear deletion formation. Our data argue against a proposed model where MGME1 functions as a key enzyme that degrades linear mtDNA fragments [14]. Firstly, our data show that deleted linear mtDNA fragments do not accumulate with age in MGME1 knockout mice. Secondly, in organello mtDNA replication assays show that there is a substantial de novo formation of linear deleted mtDNA in the absence of MGME1, whereas the degradation of this linear fragment is not affected. Two additional replication factors, POLγA and the replicative mtDNA helicase TWINKLE have been suggested to act together with MGME1 to degrade linear mtDNA fragments [14,16,17]. However, as POLγA possesses a 3´-5´exonuclease activity and MGME1 preferentially degrades single-stranded DNA in the 5′-3′ direction [9], it seems unlikely that any POLγA can compensate for loss of MGME1. Instead, the results in our study support a previously proposed model where MGME1 removes flaps generated when mtDNA replication is reaching completion [23]. In the absence of MGME1, these flaps will persist and prevent the ligation step necessary to finalize mtDNA replication, which will result in the formation of linear deleted mtDNA [23].

Unexpectedly, the Mgme1-/- mouse model also links defective mtDNA replication to inflammatory disease manifestations. Ageing Mgme1-/- mice develop kidney inflammation, tubulointerstitial fibrosis and glomerular changes leading to nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear at this point how defective mtDNA replication triggers age-associated inflammation. An increasing literature indicates that mitochondria are key participants in innate immune pathways, representing signaling platforms and participating in effector responses [24]. Under certain pathological conditions various mitochondrial ligands or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), including mtDNA, can be released from mitochondria and recognized by different pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). It is now appreciated that mtDNA can stimulate different PRRs, including cytosolic cGAS, endosomal localised TLR9 and inflamasomes to activate various pro-inflammatory signaling pathways [2527]. Future studies should aim to investigate if the inflammation associated with MGME1 defficiency is triggered by mtDNA release.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations and guidelinesof the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). The protocol was approved by the “Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein- Westfalen” (reference numbers 81.02.04.2020.A082, 84–02.04.2015.A103 and 84–02.50.15.004) and by the Stockholm ethical committee (Stockholms djurförsöksetiska nämnd) under the ethical permit 1206–2019. The mice were maintained according to the GMC housing conditions (www.mouseclinic.de) in strict accordance with directive 2010/63/EU, the local government and German laws. The GMC holds a general license to run phenotype assessments in mice and all tests are approved by the responsible authority of the district government of Upper Bavaria.

Animals and housing

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations and guidelinesof the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). The protocol was approved by the “Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein- Westfalen” (reference numbers 81.02.04.2020.A082, 84–02.04.2015.A103 and 84–02.50.15.004). The Mgme1 knockout and wild-type mice on a C57BL/6N background were housed in standard individually ventilated cages (45 x 29 x 12 cm) under a 12h light/ dark schedule in controlled environmental conditions of 22 ± 2°C and 50 + 10% relative humidity and fed a normal chow diet and water ad libitum. Generation of the Mgme1 knockout mice was described before [13]. Characterization on 14 female Mgme1-/- and 15 Mgme1+/+ littermate controls and 15 male Mgme1-/- and 15 Mgme1+/+ littermate controls was performed at the German Mouse Clinic. Body weight measurements started at the age of 8 weeks, the phenotyping examination of 3 female Mgme1-/- and 4 females controls, 5 male Mgme1-/- and 6 male controls was performed at 68 weeks of age, comprising tests examining Neurology, Dysmorphology, Metabolism, Cardiology, Clinical Chemistry and Pathology. The mice were maintained according to the GMC housing conditions (www.mouseclinic.de) in strict accordance with directive 2010/63/EU, the local government and German laws. The GMC holds a general license to run phenotype assessments in mice and all tests are approved by the responsible authority of the district government of Upper Bavaria. The phenotypic tests were performed as outlined in the standard operating procedures (SOP) linked to the EMPReSS website http://empress.har.mrc.ac.uk.

Experimental groups were assigned according to the genotype of the animals. The selection of the mice for testing was balanced, control and mutants were measured alternately. Most of the tests were not conducted in blinded conditions because the results were recorded directly by the machines and, therefore, not influenceable by the examiner. The experiment was conducted in blinded conditions whenever there could have been an influence from the investigator. All the procedures are described in SOPs. Metadata for each data point was recorded throughout the measurements.

Body composition assessment (GMC)

Body composition was analysed with time domain-nuclear magnetic resonance (Bruker Minispec LF 50) in live mice without the administration of anesthesia at 68 weeks of age of 4 wild-type and 3 mutant females and 6 wild-type and 5 mutant males. Body weight measured at the same time of the analysis was used to determine the body fat and lean percent.

Pathological analyses and immunohistochemistry (GMC)

Microscopy and histopathological analyses using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections (3 μm) were performed as described in www.mouseclinic.de/screens/pathology. A Leica Bond III (Leica Biosystems) automatic stainer was used for immunohistochemistry. Heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer (pH 6) for 30 minutes (AR9961; Bond Epitope Retrieval Solution; Leica Biosystems). Antibodies against CD3 (Clone SP7; ZYT-RBG024; Zytomed systems) and CD45R/B220 (Clone RA3-6B2; 550286; BD Pharmingen) were employed and the staining was detected with DAB chromogen. PAS (Periodic acid-Schiff) staining was performed to study glomerular changes in the kidneys (in particular mesangial expansion). Tubulointerstitial fibrosis was assessed with Sirius Red staining using standard protocols. The slides were scanned using a Hamamatsu NanoZoomer 2.0HT digital scanner and analyzed by two independent pathologists using NDP.view2 software (Hamamatsu Photonics).

Eye histology: At sacrifice the eyes were enucleated and after 24 hour Davidson fixation were embedded in Technovit 8100 (Heraeus Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany) and kept for polymerization for 6–10 hours at 4°C. Samples, cut in 2 μm sagitally through the middle of the eye ball, were stained with basic fuchsin and methylene blue. Slides were scanned (NanoZoomer 2.0HT Digital slide scanner, Hamamatsu, Japan) and taken images were processed with an image-processing program (Adobe Inc., 2019. Adobe Illustrator).

Blood collection

Blood samples were collected under isoflurane anaesthesia by retrobulbar puncture as a final blood withdrawal without prior fasting of the animals from 5 homozygous mutant and 6 wild-type males as well as 3 homozygous and 4 wild-type females. An aliquot of 50μl whole blood was collected in EDTA-coated end-to-end capillaries and diluted 1:5 with buffer provided from Sysmex (Cell-Pack buffer) for subsequent analysis of basic haematological parameters. Blood samples for clinical chemistry analyses were collected in Li-heparin-coated tubes and stored at room temperature until centrifugation (4500xg, 10 min) and separation of plasma aliquots for further analyses. Plasma samples were frozen at -80°C until analysis within one week after collection.

Clinical chemistry and cytokines

For the clinical chemistry analyses plasma samples were thawed at room temperature, diluted 1:2 with deionised water, mixed thoroughly, and centrifuged again (5000xg, 10 min) to remove clots from the sample. Measurement of circulating biochemical parameters was performed using a clinical chemistry analyser (Beckman Coulter AU 480 autoanalyzer, Krefeld, Germany). A broad set of parameters was measured using the respective kits provided by Beckman Coulter, in order to determine various enzyme activities as well as plasma concentrations of specific substrates and electrolytes in ad libitum fed mice [28]. Multiplex measurement of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α, KC/GRO, IL-2, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-4 and IL-1b was performed in plasma in plasma of a separate cohort of mice at x weeks of age (wt n = 11 ; Mgme-/- n = 20).

Nitrotetrazolium blue exclusion (NBTx) staining assay

Tissue Preparation—kidneys were quickly frozen in 2-methylbutane, in a glass beaker cooled by immersion in liquid nitrogen. Frozen tissues were stored at -80°C until ready to use. Thin sections of 10 μm were cut with a cryostat at -20°C (OFT 5000, Bright Instruments, Luton, UK) and mounted on Superfrost Plus microscope slides (Menzel, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and air-dried for 5 to 10 min. Slides were kept at -80°C for maximum a few months to avoid the loss of enzyme activity.

Staining Protocol—slides were taken out of the -80°C freezer and thawed briefly at room temperature on a slide holder without lid. Sections (3 sections per slide) were then covered with 1ml PBS for 10 min in an incubator set at 21°C (1 ml per slide). PBS was discarded and replaced with 1 ml NBTx solution. Sections of kidneys were left 30 min at 21°C in the incubator and washed briefly in purified water followed by dehydration in ethanol (2 min in 50%, 75%, 96%, 100% followed by an extra 5 min in 100% ethanol). Finally, slides were immersed for 5 min in two changes of xylene before mounted on coverslips with Cytoseal (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany).

Isolation of mitochondria from mouse tissues

Mitochondria were isolated from mouse tissues using differential centrifugation as previously described [29]. Briefly, freshly obtained tissues were cut, washed with ice cold PBS and homogenized in mitochondrial isolation buffer containing (320 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.4, and 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with 1× Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) by using a Teflon pestle (Schuett Biotec). After 10 min centrifugation at 1000×g using swing-out rotor at 4°C the supernatants were subsequently spun at 10000×g for 10 min at 4°C to isolate the mitochondria.

mtDNA extraction and Southern blot analysis

Total DNA or mtDNA was isolated from pulverized tissue or purified mitochondria respectively, using Gentra Puregene Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to kit instructions. DNA quantification was performed with the Qubit 1.0 fluorometer (Thermofisher). 300–1000 μg of DNA were digested with SacI restriction nuclease and DNA fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-N+ membranes, GE Healthcare) and hybridized with αP32-dCTP-labeled probes. For 7S DNA, Southern blot samples were heated for 3 min at 93°C prior to loading. Southern blot signals were quantified using MultiGauge or ImageJ softwares.

In organello replication

1 mg of freshly isolated heart mitochondria were resuspended in 0.5 ml of incubation buffer (25 mM sucrose, 75 mM sorbitol, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM K2HPO4, 0.05 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ADP, 10 mM glutamate, 2.5 mM malate, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin, 50 μM each of dTTP, dCTP and dGTP and 20 μCi α-32P-dATP (3000 Ci/mmol). Incubation was carried out at 37°C for 2h on a rotating wheel. For the chase reisolated mitochondria were incubated in 0.5 ml of incubation buffer supplemented with all four non-radiolabeled dNTPs (50 μM) for indicated time. After incubation, mitochondria were pelleted at 9000 rpm for 4 min and washed twice with washing buffer (10% glycerol, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8, 0.15 mM MgCl2). In the following step DNA isolation and Southern blot analysis were performed as described above.

Western blot analysis and BN-PAGE

20 μg of isolated mitochondria were resuspended in 4X Lämmli-Buffer (4% SDS, 20% Glycerol, 120mM Tris, 0,02% Bromophenol Blue), proteins were separated on 4–12% NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred on Hybond-P membrane (GE Helthcare). MitoProfile total OXPHOS antibody cocktail (MitoSciences) antibody was used for the western blotting. Western blot signals were quantified using the ImageJ processing program.

BN-PAGE and subsequent in gel activity were performed as previously described [30]. For BN-PAGE, 75 μg of isolated kidney mitochondria were lysed in 50 μl solubilization buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.4; 0.1 mM EDTA; 50 mM NaCl; 10% [v/v] glycerol) containing 1% (w/v) digitonin (Calbiochem) and mixed with loading dye (5% [w/v] Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, 150 mM Bis-Tris, and 500 mM ε-amino-n-caproic acid [pH 7.0]). BN-PAGE samples were resolved on self-made 3%– 13% gels. Protein complexes were visualized using in gel activity staining for complexes I, II and IV. For CI in gel activity the BN-PAGE gel was incubated in 2 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.4, 0.1 mg/ml NADH (Roche) and 2.5 mg ml-1 iodonitrozolium (Sigma) for about 10 minutes. In gel CIV activity was determined by incubating the BN-PAGE gels in 10 ml of 0.05 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 25 mg 3.3´-diamidobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB), 50 mg Cyt c, 3.75 g Sucrose and 1 mg Catalase for approximately 1h. For the CII assay, the buffer contained 200 μl of sodium succinate (1 M), 8 μl of phenazine methosulfate (250 mM dissolved in DMSO), and 25 mg of NTB in 10 ml of 5 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4. Incubation of 10–30 min was required. All in gel staining reactions were carried out at room temperature and stopped using solution containing 50% methanol, 10% acetic acid for 30 min.

Statistics

Tests for genotype effects of the phenotyping data were made by Wilcoxon rank sum test for parametric data, if not indicated otherwise. A P < 0.05 has been used as a level of significance; a correction for multiple testing has not been performed. Figures were prepared using GraphPad Prism version 7.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Gross phenotypes.

(A) Survival percent by sex. The attrition rate in females was significant with a p = 0,0017 Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. 11 from 14 female mutants and 2 from 15 control, 8 from 13 males mutants and 4 from 15 control animals did not reach the end of phenotyping. (B) Lean mass indicated as percent of body weight and adiposity index intended as ratio between fat and lean mass of 68 week-old n = 4 wild-type and 3 Mgme1-/- females and 6 wild-type and 5 Mgme1-/- males. Fat mass is indicated as percent of bodyweight. Values are given as mean ± SD, ** P ≤ 0.01, Unpaired Mann Whitney test.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Southern blots of mtDNA isolated from various tissues of young and old control and Mgme1-/- mice that were used for the quantification presented in Fig 2A.

(A) liver, (B) kidney, (C) heart, (D) skeletal muscle and (E) brain.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Southern blots of young and old control and Mgme1-/- mice that were used for the quantification presented in Fig 2C and 2D.

(A) heart (B) kidney. Panels on the left were used for quantification of total and full length mtDNA levels and the panels on the right for quantification of 7S DNA. The 18S rDNA was used as a loading control.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Cell specific OXPHOS dysfunction in aged kidney of Mgme1-/- mice.

(A) Steady-state levels of OXPHOS subunits in heart and kidney of control (+/+) and Mgme1 knockout (-/-) mice. (B) Quantification of steady state levels of OXPHOS subunits from kidney tissue. (C) BN-PAGE analysis followed by in-gel enzyme activities of complexes I, IV and II (loading control) in Mgme1 knockout (-/-) and wild-type (+/+) kidney mitochondria at 55 weeks of age. (D) NBTx staining of kidney sections from Mgme1 knockout (-/-) and wild-type (+/+) mice. Representative pictures from multiple analysed sections from 5 wild-type (+/+) and 5 knockout (-/-) animals are shown.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Late adult screening pipeline overview.

In orange: Modified protocol for the Mgme1 knockout mice and controls.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Sumarized results of the clinical chemistry analysis.

(PDF)

S1 Data. The numerical data underlying the graphs or summary statistics in this study.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Petra Kirschner for expert technical assistance.We thank the FACS & Imaging core facility of Max Planck Institute for biology of Ageing in Cologne.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants to NGL from the Swedish Research Council (2015-00418), Swedish Cancer Foundation (2021.1409), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation, European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant 2016-741366), Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF20OC0063616), Diabetesfonden (DIA2020-516) and grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils (SLL2018.0471). GMC is supported by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Infrafrontier grant 01KX1012 to MHdA) and the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) (MHdA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Viscomi C, Zeviani M. MtDNA-maintenance defects: syndromes and genes. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10545-017-0027-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Young MJ, Copeland WC. ScienceDirect Human mitochondrial DNA replication machinery and disease. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;38: 52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gustafsson CM, Falkenberg M, Larsson N-G. Maintenance and Expression of Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA. Annu Rev Biochem. 2016;85: 133–160. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morgenstern M, Peikert CD, Lübbert P, Suppanz I, Klemm C, Alka O, et al. Quantitative high-confidence human mitochondrial proteome and its dynamics in cellular context. Cell metabolism. 2021;33: 2464–2483.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Van Goethem G, Dermaut B, Löfgren A, Martin JJ, Van Broeckhoven C. Mutation of POLG is associated with progressive external ophthalmoplegia characterized by mtDNA deletions. Nat Genet. 2001;28: 211–212. doi: 10.1038/90034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Longley MJ, Clark S, Yu Wai Man C, Hudson G, Durham SE, Taylor RW, et al. Mutant POLG2 disrupts DNA polymerase gamma subunits and causes progressive external ophthalmoplegia. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78: 1026–1034. doi: 10.1086/504303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Spelbrink JN, Li FY, Tiranti V, Nikali K, Yuan QP, Tariq M, et al. Human mitochondrial DNA deletions associated with mutations in the gene encoding Twinkle, a phage T7 gene 4-like protein localized in mitochondria. Nat Genet. 2001;28: 223–231. doi: 10.1038/90058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jiang M, Xie X, Zhu X, Jiang S, Milenkovic D, Misic J, et al. The mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein is essential for initiation of mtDNA replication. Sci Adv. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2021;7. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf8631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kornblum C, Nicholls TJ, Haack TB, Schöler S, Peeva V, Danhauser K, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in MGME1 impair mtDNA replication and cause multisystemic mitochondrial disease. Nat Genet. Nature Publishing Group; 2013;45: 214–219. doi: 10.1038/ng.2501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hebbar M, Girisha KM, Srivastava A, Bielas S, Shukla A. Homozygous c.359del variant in MGME1 is associated with early onset cerebellar ataxia. Eur J Med Genet. 2017;60: 533–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.07.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Uhler JP, Thörn C, Nicholls TJ, Matic S, Milenkovic D, Gustafsson CM, et al. MGME1 processes flaps into ligatable nicks in concert with DNA polymerase γ during mtDNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. Oxford University Press; 2016;44: 5861–5871. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nicholls TJ, Zsurka G, Peeva V, Schöler S, Szczesny RJ, Cysewski D, et al. Linear mtDNA fragments and unusual mtDNA rearrangements associated with pathological deficiency of MGME1 exonuclease. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23: 6147–6162. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Matic S, Jiang M, Nicholls TJ, Uhler JP, Dirksen-Schwanenland C, Polosa PL, et al. Mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1 accumulate mtDNA deletions without developing progeria. Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2018;9: 1202. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03552-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peeva V, Blei D, Trombly G, Corsi S, Szukszto M, Rebelo-Guiomar P, et al. Linear mitochondrial DNA is rapidly degraded by components of the replication machinery. Nat Commun. Springer US; 2018;: 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fuchs H, Aguilar-Pimentel JA, Amarie OV, Becker L, Calzada-Wack J, Cho Y-L, et al. Understanding gene functions and disease mechanisms_ Phenotyping pipelines in the German Mouse Clinic. Behavioural Brain Research. Elsevier; 2017;: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Medeiros TC, Thomas RL, Ghillebert R, Graef M. Autophagy balances mtDNA synthesis and degradation by DNA polymerase POLG during starvation. J Cell Biol. 2018;264: jcb.201801168–11. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201801168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nissanka N, Bacman SR, Plastini MJ, Moraes CT. The mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma degrades linear DNA fragments precluding the formation of deletions. Nat Commun. Springer US; 2018;: 1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chronic Progressive Nephropathy (CPN) in the Rat: Review of Pathology and Relationship to Renal Tumorigenesis. 2008; 1–7.
  • 19.Ramón J, Vila-Julià F, Molina-Granada D, Molina-Berenguer M, Melià MJ, García-Arumí E, et al. Therapy Prospects for Mitochondrial DNA Maintenance Disorders. Int J Mol Sci. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2021;22: 6447. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rahman S, Hall AM. Mitochondrial disease—an important cause of end-stage renal failure. Pediatr Nephrol. Springer-Verlag; 2013;28: 357–361. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2362-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Galvan DL, Green NH, Danesh FR. The hallmarks of mitochondrial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2017;92: 1051–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.05.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hard GC, Johnson KJ, Cohen SM. A comparison of rat chronic progressive nephropathy with human renal disease-implications for human risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol. Taylor & Francis; 2009;39: 332–346. doi: 10.1080/10408440802368642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Falkenberg M, Gustafsson CM. Mammalian mitochondrial DNA replication and mechanisms of deletion formation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. Taylor & Francis; 2020;55: 509–524. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2020.1818684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.West AP. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a trigger of innate immune responses and inflammation. Toxicology. 2017;391: 54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Riley JS, Tait SW. Mitochondrial DNA in inflammation and immunity. EMBO Rep. 2020;21: e49799. doi: 10.15252/embr.201949799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bahat A, MacVicar T, Langer T. Metabolism and Innate Immunity Meet at the Mitochondria. Front Cell Dev Biol. Frontiers; 2021;9: 720490. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.720490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu Z, Sainz AG, Shadel GS. Mitochondrial DNA: cellular genotoxic stress sentinel. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2021;46: 812–821. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2021.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rathkolb B, Hans W, Prehn C, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, Aigner B, et al. Clinical Chemistry and Other Laboratory Tests on Mouse Plasma or Serum. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013;3: 69–100. doi: 10.1002/9780470942390.mo130043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Milenkovic D, Matic S, Kühl I, Ruzzenente B, Freyer C, Jemt E, et al. TWINKLE is an essential mitochondrial helicase required for synthesis of nascent D-loop strands and complete mtDNA replication. Hum Mol Genet. Oxford University Press; 2013;22: 1983–1993. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mourier A, Matic S, Ruzzenente B, Larsson N-G, Milenkovic D. The Respiratory Chain Supercomplex Organization Is Independent of COX7a2l Isoforms. Cell metabolism. 2014;20: 1069–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory S Barsh, Carlos T Moraes

13 Jan 2022

Dear Dr Larsson,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1 develop inflammatory kidney disease with glomerular dysfunction' to PLOS Genetics.

The manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some concerns about the current manuscript. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review a revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Carlos T. Moraes

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Dear Dr. Larsson,

Please find attached the Reviewers' comments. They found the study to be of high quality and interesting but converged in asking more information about the levels of mtDNA (linear and total) at different ages. Southern blots may be required to address this issue. They also raised a few more issues that need to be addressed.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Milenkovic et al. characterizes the aging phenotype of mice lacking MGME1 and shows that these mice present with body weight loss, retinopathy, a kidney inflammation consistent with nephrotic syndrome, leading to premature death. The same group has previously shown that young mice lacking MGME1 show abnormal mtDNA replication, that leads to accumulation of linear mtDNA fragments (in manuscript citation [13]). In this manuscript, comparison of the relative content of linear mtDNA fragments between young (10 weeks) and old (50 weeks) animals showed that MGME1 is not necessary for the degradation of the linear mtDNA fragments, as no accumulation during aging was detected. To prove, that linear mtDNA fragments are indeed degraded in MGME1-lacking mice, in organello pulse-chase experiment in isolated heart mitochondria was performed. The manuscript is well written and data are clearly presented.

Questions:

Was there a decrease in the mtDNA levels in aged animals compared to the younger ones?

Was there an accumulation of the 7S DNA in the aged mice compared to younger mice? Determination of 7S DNA levels in aged vs. young mice would by the same logic as for the linear mtDNA fragments show if MGME1 is responsible for the degradation of this DNA, as it was suggested previously?

There is an increase in the total amount of newly synthetized mtDNA in MGME1-/- mice in the in organello pulse/chase experiment, which seems to be rapidly degraded during the chase period. Is there a faster degradation of the newly synthetized mtDNA in MGME1-/- mice compared to controls and does this lead to the mtDNA depletion, rather than a problem with replication?

Were any inflammatory factors (increase in IL6/TNF/cytokines) detected in the aged mice, as Table S2 indicates that Immunology and Allergy module was performed?

Minor comments:

- Please use decimal point in P-values in the paragraph “MGME1 deficiency causes kidney inflammation and nephropathy”

- Abstract: “formation of a linear deleted mtDNA fragments” – delete “a”

Reviewer #2: This manuscript by Milenkovic et al, expands upon the understanding of the role of the mitochondrial genome maintenance exonuclease (MGME1) in vivo. In a previous study the authors examined the role of MGME1 at early ages, but this study utilized aged knockout mice to analyze the function of MGME1 and the associated disease pathophysiology, as MGME1 mutations generally manifest as disease later in life in patients.

While aging the MGME1 knockouts it was found that these animals died prematurely, so doing the standard late-adult phenotyping (at 71 weeks) was not possible. Instead, the extensive phenotyping analyses were performed at 50 weeks. This modified “late-adult” phenotyping protocol also included neurological and morphological examinations, cardiovascular monitoring, and body composition measurements to give a complete and extensive assessment of the model. From these studies the authors concluded that striking phenotypes of the aged MGME1 knockout mice included reduced weight gain during aging and later a marked weight loss. Additionally, the MGME1 knockout mice developed cataracts due to abnormal fiber rearrangement and infiltrating epithelial cells in the lens. Retinopathy as also identified, where the overall thickness of the retina and retinal layers was reduced even though all the layers of the retina were present. Renal failure was observed through elevated plasma urea and creatinine levels. The nephrotic syndrome associated with renal failure was further confirmed through histological assessments of the kidney glomeruli. Furthermore, there was detection of infiltrating T and B cells in the kidneys.

This conclusions from this manuscript are novel and compelling for the mitochondrial biology field and the overall understanding of how defective mtDNA replication can lead to manifestations of inflammatory disease. The authors show evidence that contradicts the previous proposal where MGME1 plays a role in the degradation of linear mtDNA, and instead assert that MGME1 plays a crucial role in the completion of mtDNA replication. From the phenotyping experiments the authors assert that the loss of MGME1 leads to a dramatic phenotype that includes progressive weight loss, retinopathy, cataracts, and nephrotic disease. However, there are some lingering questions that arise, particularly relating to how the MGME1 knockout mouse compares to other models of mitochondrial DNA instability or defective replication that could be discussed in the text.

1) One of the major conclusions the authors draw from their studies is that MGME1 does not play a role in degrading linear mtDNA fragments, as proposed by Peeva et al (2018). However, that paper and the papers by Medeiros et al (2018) and Nissanka et al (2018), also show that TWNK and POLG can also play a role in degrading linear mtDNA fragments. Can the authors comments on why they think these other proteins do not compensate for the loss of MGME1 to degrade linear mtDNA?

2) In Figure 2 the authors show that the levels of the linear deletion are not significantly altered between young and aged MGME1 knockout animals in different tissues. Are the levels of total mitochondrial DNA altered between young and aged MGME1 knockout animals?

3) With the conclusion that the impaired mitochondrial DNA replication is directly responsible for the kidney inflammation, could to authors comment on how their studies with the MGME1 knockout mouse compare to other mouse models of impaired mitochondrial DNA replication?

4) One of the hallmarks of the MGME1 knockout mouse model is the formation of the linear mtDNA deletion, which is also seen in the POLG mutator mouse. Comparatively however, the POLG mutator mouse does not have the same effect on mtDNA replication as the MGME1 knockout. Can the authors discuss on if they think that these linear deletions cause the systemic inflammation that causes the progressive kidney disease only in the MGME1 knockouts compared to the POLG mutator?

Reviewer #3: Mice Lacking the Mitochondrial Exonuclease MGME1 Develop Inflammatory Kidney Disease with Glomerular Dysfunction

Summary: The current publication reports on the age-associated pathology in Mgme1 KO mice and aims to expand on the role of MGME1.

The most impressive part of this manuscript is the amount of detail given to the mouse studies. It is evident that the parameters to arrive at these observational findings were meticulously planned, and there are vast amounts of data that were collected from these animals. The authors focused their attention on some of the striking pathophysiological features of these mice. Namely: survival, weight loss, body mass composition, blood chemistry and gross histology. In addition, they tackle the ongoing controversy in the field regarding the role of MGME1 in degrading linear deleted mtDNA.

Regarding the observational aspect of this publication the following points may be worth noting:

• In figure 3, where the author reports the gross eye histological images, a close-up section of the WT lens isn’t provided to have a full comparison to a KO counterpart. At the same time, the author signals that there is an invagination visible in the KO that to the untrained eye looks like tissue processing artifact. This same artifact can be seen in pane A just right of center towards the top of the image. Is this also a tissue invagination? Are there more in the KO? If perhaps it is an artifact perhaps highlighting may not serve to highlight the differences between WT and KO. The differences in the lens epithelium are evident enough. And if the differences lie in quantities, then this should be stated.

• In figure 1 and supplemental figure 1, there is a decrease in fat mass (%BW) and conversely there is an increase in lean mass (%BW). This is interesting considering MGME1 human pathology where muscle wasting has been reported. Although logically, both muscles and fat must be wasting in these animals, perhaps a mention or presentation of a graphic showing the decrease in lean muscle mass across time can further provide support for how this model is like human disease, as is the presented, it shows an increase in lean muscle mass (as a percentage of total body weight).

• In supplemental figure 2, the author reports that there is no apparent COX deficiency or OXPHOS deficiency in Mgme1 KO animals, however only the blot and BN-PAGE gel is shown. Consider quantifying these data and drawing statistics to show this very same conclusion as it is a subsection in the manuscript and not a point in one of the sections. Additionally, consider mentioning how the NBTx staining of the kidney sections showing COX deficient cells fits into the greater picture of kidney physiology. Perhaps, determining the identity of these cells (if possible) may provide a clearer picture of how kidney disease comes about and an explanation to what appears to be incongruous findings.

When it comes to the experimental aspect of the manuscript, the author claims that the findings in this manuscript contradict a previous publication that states that MGME1 degrades long linear mtDNA molecules. In the current manuscript, Mgme1 KO animals are associated with de novo formation of linear fragments that are constantly made and degraded. This is only partially substantiated by the experimental data presented in figure 2. Not only does the pulse chase experiment have no signal for the WT samples, but there is no control for what typical linear fragment degradation (in WT cells) would look like in this experiment. Although WT cells have no linear deleted mtDNA, the author states that the degradation of linear fragments in these Mgme1 KO mice is not affected by the absence of MGME1. What if the absence only dampens degradation without full ablation? Without a comparative linear deleted fragment degradation example in WT mice this conclusion cannot be drawn. What can be gathered is that the linear deleted fragment is degraded, and that perhaps there is greater mtDNA turnover in the Mgme1 KO cells which may lead to production of this fragment. If possible, providing more experimental data about mtDNA turnover in this set of mice 1) may demonstrate the differences in mtDNA quantity between the two groups and 2) may elucidate whether the production of these linear mtDNA fragments is directly tied to mtDNA replication. An interesting point seeing as MGME1 is involved in post replication processing of mtDNA.

Overall, this is a strong observational manuscript with meticulous attention placed on data collection and analysis. The conclusions drawn surrounding the role of MGME1 and linear deleted mtDNA lack additional experimental evidence. However, the conclusions drawn from the experiments presented can be adjusted if further experimental evidence cannot be provided to move forward with the current claim.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: No: There are no examples of the Southern blots used for the quantification of the linear mtDNA fragments in the Supporting information.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 1

Gregory S Barsh, Carlos T Moraes

5 Apr 2022

Dear Dr Larsson,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1 develop inflammatory kidney disease with glomerular dysfunction" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Carlos T. Moraes

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

The authors have addressed all the concerns. The Reviewers had only minor corrections.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The authors have adequately answered all my questions.

Minor comments:

Fig. 2A – please specify which bar corresponds to young and which to old animals in the figure/figure legend.

Reviewer #2: The authors have responded to all my comments, and I have no further scientific concerns, though have noted a few additional grammatical errors that should be addressed.

Minor grammatical comments:

1) In the author summary “firbrosis” should be “fibrosis”

2) In the second to last sentence of the MGME 1 deficiency results in body weight decline section of the RESULTS, the figure reference should be (Fig 2C and D, S3A and B Fig) there is an unneeded “_” between “S3A and B”

3) In the first sentence of the MGME 1 deficiency causes inflammation and nephropathy section of the RESULTS, the cytokines should be TNF-alpha and INF-gamma (switch to symbols instead of words, rather than the letters "a" and "g")

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-21-01644R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Gregory S Barsh, Carlos T Moraes

5 May 2022

PGENETICS-D-21-01644R1

Mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1 develop inflammatory kidney disease with glomerular dysfunction

Dear Dr Larsson,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1 develop inflammatory kidney disease with glomerular dysfunction" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Agnes Pap

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Gross phenotypes.

    (A) Survival percent by sex. The attrition rate in females was significant with a p = 0,0017 Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. 11 from 14 female mutants and 2 from 15 control, 8 from 13 males mutants and 4 from 15 control animals did not reach the end of phenotyping. (B) Lean mass indicated as percent of body weight and adiposity index intended as ratio between fat and lean mass of 68 week-old n = 4 wild-type and 3 Mgme1-/- females and 6 wild-type and 5 Mgme1-/- males. Fat mass is indicated as percent of bodyweight. Values are given as mean ± SD, ** P ≤ 0.01, Unpaired Mann Whitney test.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Southern blots of mtDNA isolated from various tissues of young and old control and Mgme1-/- mice that were used for the quantification presented in Fig 2A.

    (A) liver, (B) kidney, (C) heart, (D) skeletal muscle and (E) brain.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Southern blots of young and old control and Mgme1-/- mice that were used for the quantification presented in Fig 2C and 2D.

    (A) heart (B) kidney. Panels on the left were used for quantification of total and full length mtDNA levels and the panels on the right for quantification of 7S DNA. The 18S rDNA was used as a loading control.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Cell specific OXPHOS dysfunction in aged kidney of Mgme1-/- mice.

    (A) Steady-state levels of OXPHOS subunits in heart and kidney of control (+/+) and Mgme1 knockout (-/-) mice. (B) Quantification of steady state levels of OXPHOS subunits from kidney tissue. (C) BN-PAGE analysis followed by in-gel enzyme activities of complexes I, IV and II (loading control) in Mgme1 knockout (-/-) and wild-type (+/+) kidney mitochondria at 55 weeks of age. (D) NBTx staining of kidney sections from Mgme1 knockout (-/-) and wild-type (+/+) mice. Representative pictures from multiple analysed sections from 5 wild-type (+/+) and 5 knockout (-/-) animals are shown.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Late adult screening pipeline overview.

    In orange: Modified protocol for the Mgme1 knockout mice and controls.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Sumarized results of the clinical chemistry analysis.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. The numerical data underlying the graphs or summary statistics in this study.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response Milenkovic 01.03.2022.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES