Abstract
Early life stages of most coral species acquire microalgal endosymbionts (Symbiodiniaceae) from the environment, but whether exogenous symbiont uptake is possible in the adult life stage is unclear. Deep sequencing of the Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 genetic marker has revealed novel symbionts in adult corals following bleaching; however these strains may have already been present at densities below detection limits. To test whether acquisition of symbionts from the environment occurs, we subjected adult fragments of corals (six species in four families) to a chemical bleaching treatment (menthol and DCMU). The treatment reduced the native microalgal symbiont abundance to below 2% of their starting densities. The bleached corals were then inoculated with a cultured Cladocopium C1acro strain. Genotyping of the Symbiodiniaceae communities before bleaching and after reinoculation showed that fragments of all six coral species acquired the Cladocopium C1acro strain used for inoculation. Our results provide strong evidence for the uptake of Symbiodiniaceae from the environment by adult corals. We also demonstrate the feasibility of chemical bleaching followed by reinoculation to manipulate the Symbiodiniaceae communities of adult corals, providing an innovative approach to establish new symbioses between adult corals and heat-evolved microalgal symbionts, which could prove highly relevant to coral reef restoration efforts.
Subject terms: Symbiosis, DNA sequencing
Scleractinian corals prosper in oligotrophic waters by forming mutualistic relationships with microalgae (Symbiodiniaceae) that translocate photosynthate to their host [1]. Breakdown of the coral-Symbiodiniaceae symbiosis, i.e. coral bleaching, occurs in response to environmental stress and may result in widespread coral mortality [2]. Thermal stress is the primary cause of large-scale coral bleaching events, which have become more frequent and severe over recent years as climate change-driven marine heatwaves gain prevalence [3].
Bleaching tolerance of corals to elevated temperatures varies within and among species. This is partly determined by the physiological performances of their microalgal symbionts under thermal stress [4, 5]. For instance, thermotolerant Symbiodiniaceae species in the genus Durusdinium have been found to increase the bleaching threshold of the coral holobiont by 1–2 °C [6].
The Symbiodiniaceae comprise at least 15 genera and genus-level lineages which include many species [7]. Several microalgal symbionts may coexist within a coral host, with the Symbiodiniaceae communities of adult corals often being dominated by a single species [8]. Other members of the symbiont community are found in low abundances, forming a Symbiodiniaceae rare biosphere increasingly linked to coral bleaching resilience [9]. Changes in the relative abundance of Symbiodiniaceae species (shuffling) [10] and the acquisition of new symbionts from the environment (switching) [11] in adulthood are potential mechanisms for corals to adapt to increases in sea surface temperatures [4–6, 8–11]. Evidence of symbiont shuffling is widespread [4, 5, 10], yet reports of switching in adult corals remain limited to metabarcoding studies [12] and the Symbiodiniaceae rare biosphere [11], where the acquired symbionts may have been present below the detection limit before bleaching. Whilst environmental uptake of exogenous Symbiodiniaceae has been demonstrated in adult sea anemones [13] and octocorals [14], experimental evidence of switching in adult corals remains unconvincing with only a transient symbiosis being reported in adult colonies of Porites divarcata following bleaching [15].
Here we used chemical bleaching to remove >98% of the native symbiont cells from adult fragments of six coral species spanning four families (i.e. Diploastrea heliopora (Diploastraeidae), Dipsastraea pallida (Merulinidae), Echinopora lamellosa (Merulinidae), Platygyra daedalea (Merulinidae), Porites lobata (Poritidae) and Stylophora pistillata (Pocilloporidae)), which were then successfully reinfected with a cultured Symbiodiniaceae strain. Colonies were fragmented and chemically bleached (n = 16 per species) through exposure to menthol and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU; Supplementary methods section 1.3). Once bleached, the coral fragments underwent four different reinoculation treatments (n = 3 per species and treatment): (1) a negative control treatment (Ctl-) where corals were not reinoculated with any Symbiodiniaceae; (2) a positive control treatment (Ctl+) where corals were reinoculated with freshly isolated homologous Symbiodiniaceae (obtained through tissue blasting of conspecific coral fragments); (3) a reinoculation treatment (Ri) where corals were reinoculated with a cultured Cladocopium C1acro strain (SCF055-01.10) at 104 cells/ml; (4) a reinoculation with sand treatment (RiS) where corals were reinoculated as in treatment Ri in the presence of sterilised sand (Supplementary methods 1.4).
Coral pigmentation, a phenotypic trait partly dependent on Symbiodiniaceae abundance, was scored to assess the progression of bleaching and symbiosis establishment in the corals following the methodology established by Quigley et al. [16]; see Supplementary methods 1.5. Symbiodiniaceae cell density in hospite was quantified before and after chemical bleaching, and nine weeks after the first reinoculation to assess the extent of bleaching and recovery (Supplementary methods 1.6).
A decrease in pigmentation and a 98.3–99.8% reduction in Symbiodiniaceae density between the start and end of chemical bleaching was recorded in all six coral species (Figs. 1A, B; S1). Following reinoculation with the Cladocopium C1acro strain, re-pigmentation was observed across all six coral species (Figs. 1B; S2). Pigmentation scores and symbiont densities were higher in treatments Ri and RiS than in treatment Ctl-, except for P. daedalea which repigmented equally across all treatments (Figs. S2, S3).
Sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) region of the Symbiodiniaceae nrDNA was undertaken to characterise the symbiont communities before bleaching and nine weeks after the first reinoculation with Cladocopium C1acro (Table S1; Supplementary methods 1.6). The native Symbiodiniaceae communities of the six coral species were genetically distinct from the Cladocopium C1acro phylotype used for reinoculation (Fig. 2). In all six coral species, the native Symbiodiniaceae were replaced with the inoculum Cladocopium C1acro in treatments Ri and RiS, while this Cladocopium C1acrostrain was not detected in the native symbiont communities of the corals (Figs. 2, S3–S4; Table S2), demonstrating that severely bleached adult corals are able to acquire new symbionts from the environment.
The environmental acquisition of the Cladocopium C1acro strain by P. lobata and S. pistillata contributes to the growing body of evidence that vertically transmitting corals also possess the ability to acquire symbionts horizontally [17]. The presence of sand during reinoculation had a measurable effect on the composition of the Symbiodiniaceae community in P. daedalea only, which led to a mixed community with a Durusdinium phylotype that was initially detected in low abundance (<1%).
Chemical bleaching is increasingly used in studies investigating cnidarian-symbiont interactions to obtain aposymbiotic hosts for reinfection with cultured Symbiodiniaceae [13, 18]. Adult Stylophora pistillata and Isopora palifera corals have been found to lose 99% of their algal symbiont densities following menthol exposure [19]. Comparable levels of Symbiodiniaceae density reduction (98.3–99.8%) were observed for the six coral species used here. Unlike Exaiptasia diaphana [18], none of the coral species in this study were rendered completely aposymbiotic from exposure to menthol and DCMU. Severe reduction of the native Symbiodiniaceae communities, rather than complete elimination, is thus sufficient for novel symbioses to establish, though the long-term stability (>9 weeks after reinoculation) of these symbioses needs to be investigated.
Our findings provide compelling evidence that adult fragments of six coral species, spanning four families in the complex (P. lobata) and robust (D. heliopora, S. pistillata, D. pallida, E. lamellosa, P. daedalea) clades, can acquire heterologous Cladocopium C1acro symbionts from the environment. The chemical bleaching and reinoculation methodology may prove highly relevant for the study of coral-Symbiodiniaceae interactions and for the development of adult coral stock with enhanced thermal tolerance for reef restoration by inoculating them with heat-evolved Symbiodiniaceae [20].
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Baker, S. McIlroy and G. Puntin for fruitful discussion on the menthol bleaching method. This research was supported by the Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship to MJHvO (FL180100036), the Paul G Allen Family Foundation, the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program, which is funded by the partnership between the Australian Governments Reef Trust and the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, and the University of Melbourne (funding received from the North Australian Animal Trust scholarship to HJS).
Author contributions
All authors participated in the conception and design of the study. HS carried out the experiment and sample processing. HS, WC and PB performed the data analysis and figure drawing. HS, WC, PB and MvO provided critical biological interpretations of the data. HS wrote the paper. WC, PB, CH and MvO supervised this work and edited the paper.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Data availability
Raw sequences of the ITS2 Symbiodiniaceae datasets are available in GenBank (BioSample accession: SAMN22047733 – SAMN22047828; BioProject ID: PRJNA768535).
Competing interests
This research was supported by the Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship to MJHvO (FL180100036), the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program, which is funded by the partnership between the Australian Governments Reef Trust and the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, and the University of Melbourne (funding received from the North Australian Animal Trust scholarship to HJS). The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41396-022-01203-0.
References
- 1.Falkowski PG, Dubinsky Z, Muscatine L, Porter JW. Light and the Bioenergetics of a Symbiotic Coral. BioScience. 1984;34:705–9. doi: 10.2307/1309663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baird AH, Marshall PA. Mortality, growth and reproduction in scleractinian corals following bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002;237:133–41. doi: 10.3354/meps237133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pratchett MS, Heron SF, Mellin C, Cumming GS. Recurrent Mass-Bleaching and the Potential for Ecosystem Collapse on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. In: Canadell JG, Jackson RB, editors. Ecosystem Collapse and Climate Change. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis). Cham, Zug, CH:Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 265–289.
- 4.Mieog JC, Olsen JL, Berkelmans R, Bleuler-Martinez SA, Willis BL, van Oppen MJH. The roles and interactions of symbiont, host and environment in defining coral fitness. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berkelmans R, Van, Oppen MJH. The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: a “nugget of hope” for coral reefs in an era of climate change. Proc R Soc B. 2006;273:2305–12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Silverstein RN, Cunning R, Baker AC, Tenacious D. Symbiodiniumin clade D remain in reef corals at both high and low temperature extremes despite impairment. J Exp Biol. 2017;220:1192–6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.148239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pochon X, LaJeunesse TC. Miliolidium n. gen, a New Symbiodiniacean Genus Whose Members Associate with Soritid Foraminifera or Are Free-Living. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2021;68:e12856. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Silverstein RN, Correa AM, Baker AC. Specificity is rarely absolute in coral-algal symbiosis: implications for coral response to climate change. Proc R Soc B. 2012;279:2609–18. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ziegler M, Eguíluz VM, Duarte CM, Voolstra CR. Rare symbionts may contribute to the resilience of coral–algal assemblages. ISME J. 2018;12:161–72. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baker AC, Starger CJ, McClanahan TR, Glynn PW. Corals’ adaptive response to climate change: shifting to new algal symbionts may safeguard devastated reefs from extinction. Nature. 2004;430:741. doi: 10.1038/430741a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boulotte NM, Dalton SJ, Carroll AG, Harrison PL, Putnam HM, Peplow LM, et al. Exploring the Symbiodinium rare biosphere provides evidence for symbiont switching in reef-building corals. ISMEJ. 2016;10:2693–701. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rouzé H, Lecellier G, Pochon X, Torda G, Berteaux-Lecellier V. Unique quantitative Symbiodiniaceae signature of coral colonies revealed through spatio-temporal survey in Moorea. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44017-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Herrera M, Klein SG, Schmidt-Roach S, Campana S, Cziesielski MJ, Chen JE, et al. Unfamiliar partnerships limit cnidarian holobiont acclimation to warming. Glob Change Biol. 2020;26:5539–55535. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lewis CL, Coffroth MA. The Acquisition of Exogenous Algal Symbionts by an Octocoral After Bleaching. Science. 2004;304:1490–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1097323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Coffroth MA, Poland DM, Petrou EL, Brazeau DA, Holmberg JC. Environmental symbiont acquisition may not be the solution to warming seas for reef-building corals. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Quigley KM, Willis BL, Kenkel CD. Transgenerational inheritance of shuffled symbiont communities in the coral Montipora digitata. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13328. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50045-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Byler KA, Carmi-Veal M, Fine M, Goulet TL. Multiple Symbiont Acquisition Strategies as an Adaptive Mechanism in the Coral Stylophora pistillata. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Matthews JL, Sproles AE, Oakley CA, Grossman AR, Weis VM, Davy SK. Menthol-induced bleaching rapidly and effectively provides experimental aposymbiotic sea anemones (Aiptasia sp.) for symbiosis investigations. J Exp Biol. 2016;219:306–10. doi: 10.1242/jeb.128934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang JT, Chen YY, Tew KS, Meng PJ, Chen CA. Physiological and Biochemical Performances of Menthol-Induced Aposymbiotic Corals. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buerger P, Alvarez-Roa C, Coppin CW, Pearce SL, Chakravarti LJ, Oakeshott GJ, et al. Heat-evolved microalgal symbionts increase coral bleaching tolerance. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba2498. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba2498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequences of the ITS2 Symbiodiniaceae datasets are available in GenBank (BioSample accession: SAMN22047733 – SAMN22047828; BioProject ID: PRJNA768535).