Association of Smartphone Use With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors in Korean Adolescents

Sohyeon Kwon; Rockli Kim; Jong-Tae Lee; Jinho Kim; Sunmi Song; Seongcheol Kim; Hannah Oh

doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13237

. 2022 May 20;5(5):e2213237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13237

Association of Smartphone Use With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors in Korean Adolescents

Sohyeon Kwon ^1,², Rockli Kim ^1,³, Jong-Tae Lee ^1,³, Jinho Kim ^1,³, Sunmi Song ⁴, Seongcheol Kim ⁵, Hannah Oh ^1,^3,^✉

¹Interdisciplinary Program in Precision Public Health, College of Health Science, Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

²Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

³Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

⁴Rehabilitation Science Program, Department of Health Science, Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

⁵School of Media and Communication, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Accepted for Publication: April 3, 2022.

Published: May 20, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13237

^✉

Corresponding Author: Hannah Oh, ScD, Interdisciplinary Program in Precision Public Health, College of Health Science, Graduate School of Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Anam-dong, Hana Science Bldg B358, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (hannahoh@korea.ac.kr).

Author Contributions: Ms Kwon had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Kwon, Lee, Oh.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Kwon, R. Kim, J. Kim, Song, S. Kim, Oh.

Drafting of the manuscript: Kwon.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: R. Kim, Lee, J. Kim, Song, S. Kim, Oh.

Statistical analysis: Kwon.

Obtained funding: S. Kim, Oh.

Supervision: S. Kim, Oh.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by grant 2019S1A3A2099973 from the National Research Foundation of Korea (Ms Kwon and Drs S. Kim Oh).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

^✉

Corresponding author.

PMCID: PMC9123497 PMID: 35594044

Key Points

Question

Are the duration of smartphone use and types of content most frequently accessed via smartphone associated with body image distortion and weight loss behaviors among adolescents?

Findings

In this cross-sectional study of 53 133 Korean adolescents, the duration of smartphone use and the types of content most frequently accessed via smartphone were independently associated with overperception of body weight and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies.

Meaning

This study’s findings suggest a need for the identification of strategies to help adolescents develop healthy smartphone use behaviors.

Abstract

Importance

Despite high use of smartphones among adolescents, little is known about the association of smartphone use with body image and related behaviors.

Objective

To examine the associations of duration of smartphone use and types of content most frequently accessed via smartphone with body image distortion and weight loss behaviors in adolescents.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used data from the population-based Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey 2017. Participants comprised a nationally representative sample of 53 133 Korean adolescents aged 12 to 18 years. Data were collected from June 1 to July 18, 2017. The analysis was performed from February 7, 2020, to March 30, 2022.

Exposures

Self-reported duration of smartphone use (min/d) and types of content (educational or informational searches; chatting, messaging, or email; social networking services or forums; games; videos, movies, or music; webtoons or web novels; and shopping or other activities) most frequently accessed during smartphone use.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Body image distortion (overperception of body weight), weight loss attempt, use of inappropriate weight loss strategies (skipping meals, eating only 1 food at a time, vomiting, or using laxatives), and healthy weight loss behaviors (muscle-strengthening and aerobic physical activity). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs, accounting for survey sampling and adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

Among 53 133 participants, the mean (SD) age was 15.0 (1.8) years; 50.7% of participants were female, and 49.3% were male. After adjusting for types of content accessed, prolonged smartphone use (≥301 min/d) was positively associated with body image distortion (boys: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.28; girls: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30) and inappropriate weight loss strategies (boys: OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.25-1.90; girls: OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.14-2.79) in both sexes compared with minimal smartphone use (1-120 min/d). After adjusting for duration of smartphone use, the use of smartphones mainly for videos, movies, or music (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29), webtoons or web novels (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.48), and games (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32) was positively associated with body image distortion in boys compared with the use of smartphones mainly for educational or informational content. Among boys, the use of smartphones mainly for chatting, messaging, or email was positively associated with muscle-strengthening activity (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.44) and aerobic physical activity (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.29-1.55), as was the use of smartphones mainly for social networking services or forums (muscle-strengthening activity: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42; aerobic physical activity: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15-1.43). Among girls, the use of smartphones mainly for chatting, messaging, or email was positively associated with weight loss attempts (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.19-1.51) and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.25-1.99), as was the use of smartphones mainly for social networking services or forums (weight loss attempts: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36; use of inappropriate weight loss strategies: OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08-1.73).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, both the duration of smartphone use and the types of content most frequently accessed via smartphone were associated with body image distortion and weight loss behaviors in adolescents. These findings suggest a need for the identification of strategies to help adolescents develop healthy smartphone use behaviors.

This cross-sectional study uses data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey to examine the associations of duration of smartphone use and types of content most frequently accessed via smartphone with body image distortion and weight loss behaviors in Korean adolescents.

Introduction

Over the past decade, the number of smartphone users has rapidly increased worldwide.¹ Today, the smartphone has become a major screen device that is used to access various media content, including social media (eg, Instagram and Facebook), videos (eg, YouTube and Netflix), games, and music.² Smartphones also conveniently allow rapid information searches and facilitate social interaction. Among smartphone users, adolescents have the longest duration of use³ and the highest risk of smartphone overdependence compared with any other age groups.⁴ Given the increased use of smartphones among adolescents, concerns have been raised regarding the negative consequences of smartphone use for adolescent development. Some studies have reported that excessive smartphone use is associated with depression,^5,6 inadequate and low-quality sleep,⁶ and problems with social interactions⁷ among adolescents. Because adolescence is a sensitive period for psychological and behavioral development,^8,9 smartphone use during adolescence is likely to be associated with mental health and related behaviors. However, little is known about the associations of smartphone use with other psychological outcomes and related health behaviors, including body image distortion (BID) and inappropriate weight loss attempts.

When using smartphones, adolescents are likely to be exposed to various content depicting images that idealize thinness.^10,11,12 For example, fashion and beauty content that is popular among adolescents often attracts users by presenting photos and videos of models and celebrities, who are usually thinner than a typical person.¹³ Digital platforms may also prolong users’ exposure to such content via the use of web algorithms that constantly recommend and direct users to similar content.¹⁴ Continuous exposure to those images may create negative perceptions of one’s physical appearance, particularly overperception of body weight,^15,16 and promote inappropriate weight loss attempts.^17,18,19,20 Through social media and other networking platforms, adolescents may also interact with peers, spreading body dissatisfaction and the desire for an ideal body (eg, thinspiration [content idealizing and promoting thin bodies] or fitspiration [content idealizing and promoting strong, fit bodies]).²¹ Moreover, adolescents may obtain and share false information about weight loss strategies.²² Using inappropriate weight loss strategies, such as self-induced vomiting, use of laxatives or diuretics, and use of weight loss medications without prescription, rather than engaging in appropriate levels of physical activity may lead to nutritional deficiencies and growth deceleration.²³ In many countries, eating disorders and inappropriate weight loss attempts have become a public health problem among adolescents.^24,25,26

In this cross-sectional study, we examined the associations of smartphone use patterns (duration and content type) with BID (specifically overperception of body weight) and weight loss behaviors (weight loss attempts, use of inappropriate weight loss strategies, and healthy behaviors, including muscle-strengthening and aerobic physical activity) among adolescent smartphone users. While previous studies have primarily focused on smartphone addiction and problematic smartphone use,^27,28 we examined a wider range of smartphone use duration and compared associations across multiple types of content accessed via smartphone by using nationally representative survey data from South Korea, a country with one of the highest smartphone penetration rates (>94% of adolescents own smartphones).²⁹ Furthermore, because an individual’s susceptibility to BID and inappropriate weight loss behaviors as well as the specific content accessed using smartphones may vary by sex^30,31 and socioeconomic status,³² we also assessed whether these variables modified any associations.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional review board of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. All participants provided written informed consent before beginning the survey. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies.³³

Study Population

The Korea Youth Health Risk Behavior Web-Based Online Survey (KYRBS) has been conducted annually since 2005 by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the Ministry of Education to monitor health behaviors in adolescents. Each year, a nationally representative sample of middle school and high school students (aged 12-18 years) is selected using a multistage cluster sampling design based on region, city size, and school type.³⁴ Approximately 400 middle schools and 400 high schools participate in the survey each year. The survey is conducted via online self-administered questionnaires in the computer laboratory of each sampled school. The questionnaires collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, body measurements, mental health, and health behaviors, including weight loss attempts and physical activity.

The analysis was restricted to the KYRBS 2017 because it was the most recent version that collected information on both the duration of smartphone use and the types of content most frequently accessed via smartphone. Data were collected from June 1 to July 18, 2017. The analysis was performed from February 7, 2020, to March 30, 2022.

Among 62 276 adolescents who participated in the KYRBS 2017, those who were missing information on height and weight (n = 1884) were excluded. We further excluded 7259 participants who reported not using smartphones during the past 30 days because these adolescents may not have had access to smartphones and other resources required for practicing healthy lifestyles. The characteristics of participants who reported not using smartphones during the past 30 days are shown in eTable 1 in the Supplement. A total of 53 133 participants (26 220 male and 26 913 female) were included in the analysis.

Assessment of Smartphone Use

During the survey, participants were asked to report their mean weekday and weekend duration of smartphone use (min/d) during the past 30 days. Using the self-reported data on weekday and weekend use, we estimated the mean daily duration of smartphone use (calculated as the sum of 5 times the weekday duration and 2 times the weekend duration, then divided by 7) and categorized this use into quartiles (1-120 min/d, 121-180 min/d, 181-300 min/d, and ≥301 min/d). Participants also reported the single most frequently accessed content among 13 types: educational (eg, online lectures), informational searches, chatting or messaging, games, movies, webtoons (ie, digital comics) or web novels, music, videos (eg, YouTube), social networking services (eg, blogs, Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook), online community forums, email, online shopping, and other activities. Based on the similarities, we collapsed the content types into 7 groups: educational or informational searches; chatting, messaging, or email; social networking services or forums; games; videos, movies, or music; webtoons or web novels; and shopping or other activities.

Assessment of Body Image Distortion

Body weight and height were self-reported via online survey. Based on the 2017 Korean National Growth Chart,^35,36 underweight was defined as having a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) lower than the 5th percentile for age and sex, normal weight as having a BMI between the 5th and 84th percentile for age and sex, and overweight as having a BMI in the 85th percentile or higher for age and sex. Participants reported their perceptions of their current body weight as very lean, lean, normal weight, fat, or very fat; the words fat and very fat were chosen because the survey measured respondents’ perceptions, and these words are commonly used by adolescents. In our analyses, we defined BID as overperception of body weight, with participants classified as having BID if they were (1) underweight but perceived themselves as normal weight, fat, or very fat; (2) normal weight but perceived themselves as fat or very fat; or (3) overweight but perceived themselves as very fat. In sensitivity analyses, we further divided the categories into underperception, accurate perception, and overperception of body weight and examined the associations of smartphone use patterns with both underperception and overperception of body weight.

Assessment of Weight Loss Behaviors

Participants were asked to report whether they tried to lose weight during the past 30 days and whether they used any of the following inappropriate weight loss strategies: skipping meals for more than 24 hours, eating only 1 food item, inducing vomiting after a meal, using laxatives or diuretics, and using weight loss medications without prescription. Healthy behaviors included aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity. For aerobic physical activity, participants reported the number of days they engaged in at least 60 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity and the number of days they engaged in at least 20 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity during the past 7 days. For muscle-strengthening activity (eg, doing pushups or lifting weights), participants reported the number of days they performed that activity during the past 7 days. For both muscle-strengthening and aerobic physical activity, we dichotomized participants into 2 groups based on the national physical activity guidelines for adolescents (moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity at least 5 days/week or vigorous-intensity aerobic activity at least 3 days/week; muscle-strengthening activity at least 3 days/week).³⁷

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses accounted for sampling weights and the complex sampling design of the survey. Study participants were weighted to represent the entire Korean population of middle school and high school students. We performed weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for the associations of smartphone use patterns (duration and content type) with BID and weight loss behaviors. Multivariable models were adjusted for potential confounders, including grade in school, household income, parental coresidence, parental educational level, region, perceived stress level, presence of depressive symptoms, and BMI. In all models, we mutually adjusted for the duration of smartphone use and the type of content most frequently accessed to examine the independent association of each variable. For the duration analysis, we tested for trend using the Wald test for category-specific medians.³⁸ For the content analysis, we tested for overall difference among the categories using a global F test.³⁹

In secondary analyses, we examined the role of BID in the association between smartphone use patterns and weight loss behaviors by comparing models with and without additional adjustment for BID. Because adolescents who already had BID (one of the most important risk factors for weight loss behaviors^18,20) may have been more susceptible to the consequences of smartphone use, we also examined the association of smartphone use patterns with weight loss behaviors after stratification by BID. To examine whether the association with duration of smartphone use varied by the type of content most frequently accessed, we also stratified the duration analysis by content type and tested for interaction. In addition, we stratified the analyses by sex and socioeconomic factors (household income and parental educational level), which were potential modifiers in the associations. We tested for interaction using the Wald test for product terms (ie, smartphone use patterns and the variable being evaluated). Because most interactions by sex were statistically significant, we reported the results in male and female adolescents separately.

In sensitivity analyses, we conducted separate analyses for weekday and weekend smartphone use to examine the variation in associations by day of smartphone use. Because overperception of body weight among adolescents who are overweight may be more difficult to define and subject to greater measurement error (eg, the ceiling effect), we also repeated the analyses after excluding those adolescents. In separate sensitivity analyses, we stratified our analyses by BMI (underweight, normal weight, and overweight) and further investigated the association of smartphone use duration with both underperception and overperception of body weight using multivariable polytomous logistic regression models, with accurate perception as the reference outcome. To evaluate the consequences of recent changes in smartphone use patterns and the digital environment, we examined associations with smartphone use duration using more recent data from the KYRBS 2020. Because the KYRBS 2020 collected information on smartphone use duration but not content types, we used these data in sensitivity analyses only.

All statistical tests were 2-sided with a significance threshold of α = .05. We also adjusted for multiple testing using Bonferroni correction (5 tests per exposure). All analyses were performed using SURVEY procedures in SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc).

Results

Participant Characteristics

Among 53 133 participants, the mean (SD) age at the time of survey completion was 15.0 (1.8) years; 50.7% of participants were female, and 49.3% were male. Among male adolescents, the weighted prevalence of BID was 19.8%, and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies in the past 30 days was 2.9%. Among female adolescents, the weighted prevalence of BID was 31.6%, and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies in the past 30 days was 9.4%. The mean (SE) duration of smartphone use was 212.7 (2.2) minutes per day in boys and 263.8 (2.9) minutes per day in girls. The duration of smartphone use was longest among participants who used smartphones mainly for social networking services or forums (mean [SE], 280.9 [2.8] min/d) and shortest among participants who used smartphones mainly for educational or informational searches (mean [SE], 158.3 [3.1] min/d) (eTable 2 in the Supplement). Additional participant characteristics by duration of smartphone use are shown in Table 1. Adolescents with prolonged smartphone use (≥301 min/d) vs minimal smartphone use (1-120 min/d) were more likely to be female (60.4% vs 37.9%), live in rural areas (7.5% vs 5.6%) or small- to medium-sized urban areas (53.8% vs 46.9%), live with a single parent (18.3% vs 10.0%), and have low household income (19.0% vs 9.8%), low parental educational levels (eg, middle school or lower: 1.3% vs 0.5%), high levels of stress (44.0% vs 32.8%), and depressive symptoms (32.2% vs 20.4%).

Table 1. Participant Characteristics by Duration of Smartphone Use (N = 53 133).

Characteristic	Participants, unweighted No. (weighted %)^a
	Duration of smartphone use
	1-120 min/d	121-180 min/d	181-300 min/d	≥301 min/d
Total participants, No.
Unweighted	14 092	11 144	15 043	12 854
Weighted	698 144	551 804	730 726	605 491
School^b
Middle school	6994 (45.8)	5358 (43.8)	7462 (45.2)	6527 (46.3)
High school	7098 (54.2)	5786 (56.2)	7581 (54.8)	6327 (53.7)
Sex
Male	8641 (62.1)	5911 (54.4)	6746 (45.9)	4922 (39.6)
Female	5451 (37.9)	5233 (45.6)	8297 (54.1)	7932 (60.4)
Household income
Low	1402 (9.8)	1335 (11.8)	2219 (14.6)	2450 (19.0)
Middle	5802 (40.6)	5256 (46.9)	7395 (49.1)	6289 (48.8)
High	6888 (49.6)	4553 (41.3)	5429 (36.4)	4115 (32.2)
Parental coresidence
Both parents	12 325 (88.1)	9585 (86.8)	12 504 (83.7)	9997 (78.4)
Single parent	1455 (10.0)	1319 (11.4)	2167 (14.0)	2405 (18.3)
Not living with parents	312 (1.9)	240 (1.8)	372 (2.3)	452 (3.3)
Parental educational level^c
≤Middle school	83 (0.5)	79 (0.7)	152 (0.9)	186 (1.3)
High school	2408 (16.8)	2477 (22.2)	4050 (26.6)	3986 (30.7)
≥College	10 071 (73.0)	7190 (65.4)	8736 (59.2)	6267 (50.2)
Missing	1530 (9.7)	1398 (11.7)	2105 (13.3)	2415 (17.8)
Region
Rural	946 (5.6)	717 (5.0)	1159 (6.0)	1221 (7.5)
Small- and medium-sized urban	6274 (46.9)	5296 (50.5)	7277 (51.5)	6471 (53.8)
Metropolitan urban	6872 (47.6)	5131 (44.6)	6607 (42.5)	5162 (38.8)
Perceived stress level
Low	3432 (23.7)	2336 (20.4)	2799 (18.5)	2038 (16.0)
Moderate	6065 (43.5)	5011 (45.5)	6470 (43.1)	5094 (40.0)
High	4595 (32.8)	3797 (34.1)	5774 (38.4)	5722 (44.0)
Presence of depressive symptoms	2857 (20.4)	2492 (22.5)	3851 (25.7)	4138 (32.2)
Content types of smartphone use
Educational or informational searches	2081 (15.5)	807 (7.8)	765 (5.4)	411 (3.5)
Chatting, messaging, or emails	3359 (24.0)	3038 (27.7)	4124 (27.6)	4123 (32.2)
Social networking services or forums	1809 (12.7)	2032 (17.7)	3325 (21.7)	3362 (25.8)
Videos, movies, or music	3000 (21.3)	2569 (23.3)	3463 (23.4)	2452 (19.2)
Webtoons or web novels	1441 (10.2)	1055 (9.4)	1364 (8.9)	919 (7.1)
Games	2240 (15.3)	1556 (13.5)	1867 (12.0)	1418 (10.9)
Shopping or other activities	162 (1.0)	87 (0.7)	135 (0.9)	169 (1.2)
BMI^d
Underweight	982 (7.1)	743 (6.5)	1054 (7.0)	863 (6.9)
Normal weight	10 549 (74.8)	8385 (75.6)	11 099 (73.9)	9272 (72.1)
Overweight	2561 (18.1)	2016 (17.9)	2890 (19.1)	2719 (21.0)
Body image distortion^e	3116 (22.2)	2703 (24.6)	4067 (27.0)	3731 (28.8)
Weight loss attempt	3837 (27.0)	3444 (30.5)	5277 (34.9)	5061 (39.0)
Use of inappropriate weight loss strategies	511 (3.5)	526 (4.6)	945 (6.2)	1382 (10.5)
Muscle-strengthening activity that met guidelines	3570 (25.0)	2592 (22.9)	3211 (21.2)	2672 (20.6)
Aerobic physical activity that met guidelines	6147 (42.2)	4513 (39.3)	5639 (36.4)	4688 (35.7)

Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).

^{^a}

Percentages were weighted to the entire population of middle-school and high school students in Korea.

^{^b}

Grade in school was used as a proxy for age in the analyses.

^{^c}

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) parental education indicators: middle school or lower indicates both parents completed middle school education or less; high school indicates at least 1 parent graduated from high school; college or higher indicates at least 1 parent graduated from college or more.

^{^d}

Underweight was defined as BMI for age that was lower than the 5th percentile, normal weight as BMI for age that was between the 5th and 84th percentile, and overweight as BMI for age that was in the 85th percentile or higher based on the 2017 Korean National Growth Chart.

^{^e}

Body image distortion was defined as overperception of body weight, which occurred when participants who were underweight perceived themselves as normal weight, fat, or very fat; when participants who were normal weight perceived themselves as fat or very fat; and when participants with overweight perceived themselves as very fat.

Duration of Smartphone Use

After adjusting for content type, prolonged smartphone use (≥301 min/d) was associated with a higher prevalence of BID in both boys (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.28; P = .001 for trend) and girls (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30; P < .001 for trend) compared with minimal smartphone use (1-120 min/d) (Table 2). Prolonged smartphone use was also positively associated with the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies in both boys (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.25-1.90; P < .001 for trend) and girls (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.14-2.79; P < .001 for trend). Among female adolescents, prolonged smartphone use was also positively associated with weight loss attempts (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.45-1.69; P < .001 for trend). The extent of associations was higher among female vs male adolescents for weight loss attempts (OR, 1.57 vs 1.06; P < .001 for interaction) and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies (OR, 2.45 vs 1.54; P < .001 for interaction), with a statistically significant interaction by sex. The association between duration of smartphone use and weight loss behaviors did not change after additional adjustment for BID (eTable 3 in the Supplement).

Table 2. Association of Duration of Smartphone Use With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors in Male and Female Adolescents.

Outcome	Sex	Events, No.	OR (95% CI)^a				P for trend^b	P for interaction by sex^c
			Duration of smartphone use
			1-120 min/d	121-180 min/d	181-300 min/d	≥301 min/d
Body image distortion^d	Male	5205	1 [Reference]	1.07 (0.99-1.16)	1.13 (1.05-1.23)	1.17 (1.07-1.28)	.001^e	.40
Body image distortion^d	Female	8412	1 [Reference]	1.06 (0.98-1.15)	1.15 (1.06-1.24)	1.20 (1.10-1.30)	<.001^e	.40
Weight loss attempt	Male	6174	1 [Reference]	1.02 (0.94-1.11)	1.15 (1.07-1.24)	1.06 (0.97-1.16)	.09	<.001^e
Weight loss attempt	Female	11 445	1 [Reference]	1.20 (1.11-1.29)	1.35 (1.26-1.45)	1.57 (1.45-1.69)	<.001^e	<.001^e
Use of inappropriate weight loss strategies	Male	782	1 [Reference]	1.08 (0.86-1.36)	1.18 (0.97-1.44)	1.54 (1.25-1.90)	<.001^e	<.001 ^e
Use of inappropriate weight loss strategies	Female	2582	1 [Reference]	1.23 (1.06-1.42)	1.53 (1.34-1.76)	2.45 (2.14-2.79)	<.001^e	<.001 ^e
Muscle-strengthening activity^f	Male	9020	1 [Reference]	0.99 (0.92-1.07)	1.04 (0.97-1.11)	1.03 (0.96-1.11)	.30	.68
Muscle-strengthening activity^f	Female	3025	1 [Reference]	0.95 (0.84-1.08)	0.94 (0.84-1.05)	1.04 (0.92-1.18)	.24	.68
Aerobic physical activity^g	Male	13 870	1 [Reference]	1.03 (0.96-1.10)	1.01 (0.95-1.07)	1.04 (0.96-1.12)	.41	.97
Aerobic physical activity^g	Female	7117	1 [Reference]	0.96 (0.88-1.06)	0.95 (0.87-1.04)	1.02 (0.93-1.11)	.39	.97

Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

^{^a}

Adjusted for grade in school (continuous), sex (male or female), household income (low, middle, or high), parental coresidence (both parents, single parent, or not living with parents or others), parental educational level (middle school or less, high school, college or more, or missing), region (rural, small and medium-sized urban, or metropolitan urban), perceived stress level (low, moderate, or high), depressive symptoms (yes or no), body mass index (underweight, normal weight, or overweight), and type of content most frequently accessed during smartphone use (educational or informational searches; chatting, messaging, or emails; games; videos, movies, or music; webtoons or web novels; social networking services or forums; or shopping or other activities).

^{^b}

P for trend was estimated using the Wald test for continuous duration of smartphone use (with category-specific medians).

^{^c}

P for interaction by sex was estimated using the Wald test for the interaction term between sex and duration of smartphone use (with category-specific medians).

^{^d}

^{^e}

Nominal statistical significance at Bonferroni-corrected α = .01 (5 tests per exposure).

^{^f}

Defined as engagement in muscle-strengthening activity for at least 3 days per week.

^{^g}

Defined as engagement in moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity at least 5 days per week or vigorous-intensity physical activity at least 3 days per week.

When stratified by BID, similar associations were observed among participants with and without BID (eTable 4 in the Supplement). Similar associations with duration of smartphone use were observed across all content types (eTable 5 in the Supplement). When we stratified by BMI and examined the associations with both underperception and overperception of body weight, the positive associations were restricted to overperception (eg, male adolescents with overweight with smartphone use ≥301 min/d vs 1-120 min/d: OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.20-1.73; P < .001 for trend), with the exception of male adolescents with normal weight, in which a positive association with underperception was also observed (eg, ≥301 min/d vs 1-120 min/d: OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30; P = .002 for trend) (eTable 6 in the Supplement).

Content Types of Smartphone Use

Among male adolescents, using smartphones most frequently for videos, movies, or music (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29), webtoons or web novels (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.48), and games (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32) compared with educational or informational searches was associated with a higher prevalence of BID after adjustment for total duration of smartphone use (P < .001) (Table 3). Among male adolescents, higher levels of muscle-strengthening and aerobic physical activity were associated with the use of smartphones mainly for chatting, messaging, or email (muscle-strengthening activity: OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.44; aerobic activity: OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.29-1.55) and social networking services or forums (muscle-strengthening activity: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42; aerobic activity: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15-1.43). Among female adolescents, the use of smartphones mainly for webtoons or web novels was positively associated with BID prevalence (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.33), and the use of smartphones mainly for chatting, messaging, or email (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.19-1.51) and social networking services or forums (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36) was positively associated with weight loss attempts. Inappropriate weight loss strategies were also associated with the use of smartphones mainly for chatting, messaging, or email (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.25-1.99) and social networking services or forums (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08-1.73) among female adolescents. Among both male and female adolescents, the use of smartphones mainly for games was inversely associated with aerobic physical activity (boys: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95; girls: OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89). All interactions by sex were statistically significant. The associations with weight loss behaviors did not change after additional adjustment for BID (eTable 7 in the Supplement).

Table 3. Association of Smartphone Content With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors in Male and Female Adolescents.

Outcome	Sex	Events, No.	OR (95% CI)^a							P value ^b	P for interaction by sex ^c
			Content type
			Educational or informational searches	Chatting, messaging, or emails	Social networking services or forums	Videos, movies, or music	Webtoons or web novels	Games	Shopping or other activities
Body image distortion^d	Male	5205	1 [Reference]	0.94 (0.83-1.06)	0.87 (0.75-1.00)	1.15 (1.02-1.29)	1.28 (1.10-1.48)	1.17 (1.03-1.32)	1.04 (0.75-1.44)	<.001^e	.001^e
Body image distortion^d	Female	8412	1 [Reference]	0.98 (0.86-1.11)	1.00 (0.88-1.14)	1.11 (0.97-1.26)	1.15 (1.00-1.33)	1.05 (0.87-1.26)	1.03 (0.78-1.36)	.003^e	.001^e
Weight loss attempt	Male	6174	1 [Reference]	1.10 (0.97-1.24)	1.13 (0.99-1.29)	1.07 (0.95-1.20)	0.90 (0.78-1.05)	0.94 (0.84-1.06)	0.82 (0.59-1.15)	.001^e	<.001^e
Weight loss attempt	Female	11 445	1 [Reference]	1.34 (1.19-1.51)	1.20 (1.07-1.36)	1.09 (0.96-1.23)	0.88 (0.77-1.01)	0.71 (0.60-0.85)	1.26 (0.99-1.61)	<.001^e	<.001^e
Use of inappropriate weight loss strategies	Male	782	1 [Reference]	1.04 (0.75-1.44)	1.18 (0.84-1.67)	0.98 (0.72-1.34)	0.77 (0.53-1.12)	0.89 (0.64-1.24)	1.00 (0.49-2.05)	.13	.04
Use of inappropriate weight loss strategies	Female	2582	1 [Reference]	1.57 (1.25-1.99)	1.37 (1.08-1.73)	1.14 (0.89-1.46)	0.93 (0.71-1.22)	0.93 (0.65-1.33)	1.37 (0.90-2.07)	<.001^e	.04
Muscle-strengthening activity^f	Male	9020	1 [Reference]	1.31 (1.18-1.44)	1.27 (1.13-1.42)	0.95 (0.86-1.04)	0.96 (0.85-1.08)	0.82 (0.74-0.91)	1.41 (1.08-1.85)	<.001^e	<.001^e
Muscle-strengthening activity^f	Female	3025	1 [Reference]	1.08 (0.89-1.31)	0.96 (0.79-1.17)	1.10 (0.91-1.32)	0.81 (0.65-1.01)	0.77 (0.58-1.01)	1.00 (0.68-1.47)	<.001^e	<.001^e
Aerobic physical activity^g	Male	13 870	1 [Reference]	1.41 (1.29-1.55)	1.28 (1.15-1.43)	1.01 (0.92-1.11)	0.96 (0.85-1.08)	0.87 (0.79-0.95)	1.82 (1.40-2.36)	<.001^e	<.001^e
Aerobic physical activity^g	Female	7117	1 [Reference]	0.95 (0.84-1.08)	0.85 (0.74-0.97)	0.97 (0.84-1.11)	0.90 (0.78-1.04)	0.72 (0.59-0.89)	1.05 (0.78-1.41)	<.001^e	<.001^e

Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

^{^a}

Adjusted for grade in school (continuous), sex (male or female), household income (low, middle, or high), parental coresidence (both parents, single parent, or not living with parents or others), parental education (middle school or less, high school, college or more, or missing), region (rural, small and medium-sized urban, or metropolitan urban), perceived stress level (low, moderate, or high), depressive symptoms (yes or no), body mass index (underweight, normal weight, or overweight), and duration of smartphone use (≤120 min/d, 121-180 min/d, 181-300 min/d, or ≥301 min/d).

^{^b}

P value was estimated using a global F test comparing across types of content most frequently accessed during smartphone use.

^{^c}

P for interaction by sex was estimated using a global F test for interaction terms between sex and types of content accessed during smartphone use.

^{^d}

^{^e}

Nominal statistical significance at Bonferroni-corrected α = .01 (5 tests per exposure).

^{^f}

Defined as engagement in muscle-strengthening activity for at least 3 days per week.

^{^g}

Defined as engagement in moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity at least 5 days per week or vigorous-intensity physical activity at least 3 days per week.

Most associations remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (Table 2 and Table 3). In analyses stratified by household income and parental educational level, the direction of associations was largely consistent in all subgroups (eTable 8 in the Supplement). Similar associations were observed for the duration of smartphone use on weekdays and weekends (eTable 9 in the Supplement), after excluding adolescents with overweight (eTable 10 and eTable 11 in the Supplement), and after using more recent data from the KYRBS 2020 (eTable 12 in the Supplement).

Discussion

In this cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of Korean adolescents, we found that prolonged smartphone use was associated with a higher prevalence of BID and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies. With adjustment for duration of smartphone use, the use of smartphones mainly for entertainment-focused content (such as videos, movies, music, webtoons, web novels, and games) was associated with a higher prevalence of BID. Using smartphones mainly for interaction-focused content (such as chatting, messaging, email, social networking services, and forums) was associated with higher levels of muscle-strengthening and aerobic physical activity in male adolescents. In female adolescents, using smartphones mainly for interaction-focused content was positively associated with weight loss attempts and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies. These data suggest that both duration of smartphone use and types of content accessed via smartphone were independently associated with BID and weight loss behaviors among adolescents.

Our findings of a positive association between prolonged smartphone use and BID are consistent with results from previous studies on internet addiction.^40,41,42 In those studies, adolescents reporting internet addiction symptoms were more likely to experience overperception of body weight and body image avoidance (ie, behavioral avoidance of situations in which one’s body shape is conspicuous).^40,41,42 In the present study, we observed a positive association with BID among adolescents with moderate ranges of smartphone use duration that are commonly found in adolescents without addiction problems, suggesting that even moderate use of smartphones may have unhealthy consequences for body image. Furthermore, these associations persisted after adjusting for content types, supporting the independent associations with duration of smartphone use. Individuals with prolonged smartphone use are more likely to be exposed to idealized body images and appearance-related content from various digital platforms (eg, social media, blog posts, and advertisements),¹⁴ which provide increased opportunities for cognitive internalization of idealized body shapes and engagement in body comparison that may lead to negative body image.⁴³ The perception of body weight may also be associated with misleading messages and content from marketing companies¹¹ and peers on digital platforms. Marketing companies, including those advertising weight loss products, often feature thin models and celebrities to promote their products, delivering the message that if you use their products, you too can become thin and beautiful. Unsubstantiated claims and deceptive advertising are particularly prevalent in online advertisements of weight loss products.^44,45 Moreover, personalized web algorithms may lead users to consume more extreme content that triggers unhealthy perceptions and behaviors.⁴⁶

In the present study, we also observed that, given a similar total duration of smartphone use, male and female adolescents who used smartphones most frequently for entertainment-focused content (such as videos, movies, music, webtoons, web novels, and games) had a higher BID prevalence compared with those who used smartphones to access other content. Other studies^47,48,49,50 have also reported that children and adolescents who watched music videos^48,49,50 and played appearance-focused internet games, such as dress-up or makeover games (eg, those in which players change the clothes and hairstyle of a female character to match the male character’s dream date),⁴⁷ were more likely to experience body dissatisfaction. Many modern online games that are easily accessible via smartphone are focused on appearance, depicting images of authentic-looking game characters (or avatars) with unrealistic idealized body shapes.⁵¹ Those who listen to music on smartphones are also more likely to be exposed to music videos that feature thin models and celebrities (eg, K-pop stars).^48,49,50 Visual exposure to images idealizing thinness may intensify internalization of this thin ideal and trigger overperception of one’s body weight. While these previous studies primarily focused on investigating the associations of single specific types of media content,^15,49,50,52 our study compared the associations among different content types and found that exposure to entertainment-focused content may be associated with a more negative body image than other content types. Adolescents’ cognitive internalization may be more sensitive and responsive to visual exposure.⁵³ In addition, visual memory and imagery have been identified as important factors associated with body dissatisfaction in young women.⁵⁴

Our findings also suggest that the associations with smartphone use are not limited to negative body image and may further extend to weight loss behaviors. In the present study, prolonged smartphone use was associated with more prevalent use of inappropriate weight loss strategies among both male and female adolescents. Previous studies also reported a higher prevalence of eating disorders and laxative intake associated with prolonged internet use⁵⁵ and internet addiction⁴¹ in adolescents. These associations are consistent with the positive association we observed with BID, an important risk factor for weight loss behaviors,^18,20 suggesting that BID may be a possible link in the association between smartphone use and weight loss behaviors. However, we also observed that the positive association between prolonged smartphone use and inappropriate weight loss strategies was not attenuated after adjustment for BID, suggesting that BID-independent mechanisms may exist. Through digital platforms, adolescents may access and share diverse information about health, beauty, and weight management that have not been validated. Adolescents may be exposed to dramatic advertisements of weight loss products and anecdotes of extreme weight loss strategies.^44,45 Adolescents may also easily create and spread unhealthy ideas and information to peers. Digital platforms also provide opportunities for adolescents to learn behaviors from peers who attract attention (eg, those receiving many likes on social media) and gather information about normative behaviors that are common and accepted among peers. Digital media, particularly given its ease of accessibility, may act as a super peer that substantially impacts adolescents’ perceptions and behaviors.^56,57 Studies^58,59,60 have found that digital media may have implications for adolescents’ risky behaviors, including smoking and substance use, through mechanisms associated with social norms that are created by the content and ideas shown and discussed in digital platforms.

Furthermore, using smartphones mainly for interaction-focused content, such as social networking services, forums, chatting, and messaging, was more closely associated with weight loss behaviors compared with other content types. Our data suggest that, in terms of behavioral change, communicating ideas and sharing tips about weight loss strategies with peers or like-minded individuals on social networking platforms may be more relevant than mere exposure to visual images of distant figures (eg, celebrities or game characters). In the present study, we also observed some variation in associations by sex. Interaction-focused content was associated with higher levels of physical activity in male adolescents; however, in female adolescents, interaction-focused content was associated with a higher prevalence of inappropriate weight loss attempts and strategies. The discrepant findings by sex may be partially explained by different targeting of thinspiration vs fitspiration⁶¹ messages and imagery between the sexes. A previous study reported that women were more likely to encounter thinspiration, and men more likely to encounter fitspiration, messages and imagery.³¹ Digital content and web algorithms are likely designed to target each sex differently, reflecting gender characteristics and stereotypes.⁶² Our finding of higher levels of physical activity associated with interaction-focused content among male adolescents also suggests that smartphone use may have some association with healthy adolescent behaviors if appropriate messages are delivered. Further investigation may be needed to clarify the role of smartphone use in weight loss behaviors among male vs female adolescents.

Compared with other content types, the use of smartphones to play games was also associated with lower levels of physical activity in both sexes. A previous study also reported lower levels of physical activity among male adolescents who played computer games.⁶³ The associations may be partially explained by the higher likelihood of sedentary lifestyles among individuals who regularly play games on smartphones and computers.⁶⁴ Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms associated with different smartphone content and weight loss behaviors.

Strengths and Limitations

This study has several strengths. First, by using nationally representative data, we increased the generalizability of our results. Second, the use of a large sample allowed for the performance of various stratified analyses with sufficient statistical power. Third, we reduced confounding through careful adjustment for potential confounders, including socioeconomic status and psychological factors. We also examined the independent associations of smartphone use duration and content type by mutually adjusting within the models.

This study also has limitations. First, given the cross-sectional design, it is difficult to clarify the temporal association between exposure and outcome variables. Further studies are needed to confirm our results using a longitudinal design. Second, we used self-reported data on body weight and smartphone use, which are subject to measurement errors. Measurement errors of body weight may have led to misclassification of BID. Although the questionnaires on self-perception of body weight and weight loss behaviors have previously been found to have good reliability in both sexes,⁶⁵ the validity and reliability of other variables, such as smartphone use patterns, have not been evaluated. Furthermore, when assessing smartphone content, participants were asked to report the single most frequently accessed type of content. Therefore, the associations we observed for specific content types may reflect the mixed effects of several content types if participants simultaneously used multiple types.

Conclusions

This cross-sectional study found that both the duration of smartphone use and the types of content accessed via smartphone were associated with overperception of body weight and the use of inappropriate weight loss strategies among adolescents. Because accessibility to various digital content via smartphone has become easier, the inclusion of digital literacy education in health promotion strategies is needed to help adolescents critically evaluate and interpret the messages they encounter on digital platforms. At home, appropriate guidance is warranted to help adolescents develop healthy smartphone use behaviors. Digital platform providers may also consider taking more social responsibility for the content created and distributed on their platforms, thereby increasing their positive influence.

Supplement.

eTable 1. Participant Characteristics According Smartphone Use Duration, Including Adolescents Who Reported No Smartphone Use During the Past 30 Days

eTable 2. Distribution of Smartphone Use Duration (Minutes/Day) According to Individuals’ Most Frequently Used Smartphone Content Type in Male and Female Adolescents

eTable 3. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Body Image Distortion (Overperception of Body Weight) and Weight Loss Behaviors (Weight Loss Attempts, Use of Inappropriate Weight Loss Strategies, Muscle-Strengthening Activity, and Aerobic Physical Activity) With Additional Adjustment for Body Image Distortion Among Male and Female Adolescents

eTable 4. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Weight Loss Behaviors (Weight Loss Attempts, Use of Inappropriate Weight Loss Strategies, Muscle-Strengthening Activity, and Aerobic Physical Activity) in Male and Female Adolescents, Stratified by Body Image Distortion

eTable 5. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors Among Male and Female Adolescents, Stratified by Types of Content Most Frequently Accessed During Smartphone Use

eTable 6. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Underperception and Overperception of Body Weight Among Male and Female Adolescents, Stratified by Body Mass Index

eTable 7. Association of Smartphone Content Type With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors With Additional Adjustment for Body Image Distortion Among Male and Female Adolescents

eTable 8. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors Among Male and Female Adolescents, Stratified by Household Income and Parental Educational Level

eTable 9. Association of Weekday and Weekend Smartphone Use Duration With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors

eTable 10. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Body Image Distortion (Overperception of Body Weight) and Weight Loss Behaviors (Weight Loss Attempts, Use of Inappropriate Weight Loss Strategies, Muscle-Strengthening Activity, and Aerobic Physical Activity) in Male and Female Adolescents After Excluding Adolescents Who Were Overweight

eTable 11. Association of Smartphone Content Types With Body Image Distortion (Overperception of Body Weight) and Weight Loss Behaviors (Weight Loss Attempts, Use of Inappropriate Weight Loss Strategies, Muscle-Strengthening Activity, and Aerobic Physical Activity) in Male and Female Adolescents After Excluding Adolescents Who Were Overweight

eTable 12. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Body Image Distortion (Overperception of Body Weight) and Weight Loss Behaviors (Weight Loss Attempts, Use of Inappropriate Weight Loss Strategies, Muscle-Strengthening Activity, and Aerobic Physical Activity) in Male and Female Adolescents in the KYRBS 2020 Data

Click here for additional data file.^{(554.8KB, pdf)}

References

1.Silver L. Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equally. Pew Research Center. February 5, 2019. Accessed May 25, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/05/smartphone-ownership-is-growing-rapidly-around-the-world-but-not-always-equally
2.Park MH, Song HY. Relationship among the Korean adolescents obesity, health behavior and smart phone usage. J Korean Public Health Nurs. 2019;33:47-58. doi: 10.5932/JKPHN.2019.33.1.47 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3.De-Sola Gutiérrez J, Rodríguez de Fonseca F, Rubio G. Cell-phone addiction: a review. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:175-175. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Korean Statistical Information Service. Smartphone overdependence statistics, 2016-2019. Korean Statistical Information Service, 2020. Accessed May 25, 2020. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=127&tblId=DT_120019N_2016_001&conn_path=I2
5.Kim H, Cho MK, Ko H, Yoo JE, Song YM. Association between smartphone usage and mental health in South Korean adolescents: the 2017 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey. Korean J Fam Med. 2020;41(2):98-104. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.18.0108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Sohn SY, Rees P, Wildridge B, Kalk NJ, Carter B. Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2350-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Rotondi V, Stanca L, Tomasuolo M. Connecting alone: smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. J Econ Psychol. 2017;63:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.09.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8.Blakemore SJ, Mills KL. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:187-207. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Crone EA, Konijn EA. Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Derenne J, Beresin E. Body image, media, and eating disorders—a 10-year update. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(1):129-134. doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0832-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Diedrichs PC, Lee C, Kelly M. Seeing the beauty in everyday people: a qualitative study of young Australians’ opinions on body image, the mass media and models. Body Image. 2011;8(3):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Cafri G, Yamamiya Y, Brannick M, Thompson JK. The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol. 2005;12(4):421-433. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bpi053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13.Hsu CKJ. Selling American beauty to teen girls: a content analysis of female celebrity advertisements in Seventeen. Advertising and Society Review. 2013;14(2):e0015. doi: 10.1353/asr.2013.0015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14.Liu J. The influence of the body image presented through TikTok trend-videos and its possible reasons. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2021). Atlantis Press. June 10, 2021. Accessed February 17, 2022. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iclace-21/125957570
15.Hawes T, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Campbell SM. Unique associations of social media use and online appearance preoccupation with depression, anxiety, and appearance rejection sensitivity. Body Image. 2020;33:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Hogue JV, Mills JS. The effects of active social media engagement with peers on body image in young women. Body Image. 2019;28:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Jasik CB. Body image and health: eating disorders and obesity. Prim Care. 2014;41(3):519-537. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2014.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Choi JS, Kim JS. Mediating effect of body image distortion on weight loss efforts in normal-weight and underweight Korean adolescent girls. J Sch Health. 2017;87(3):217-224. doi: 10.1111/josh.12483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Neumark-Sztainer D, Paxton SJ, Hannan PJ, Haines J, Story M. Does body satisfaction matter? five-year longitudinal associations between body satisfaction and health behaviors in adolescent females and males. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Lee J, Lee Y. The association of body image distortion with weight control behaviors, diet behaviors, physical activity, sadness, and suicidal ideation among Korean high school students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2703-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Kim JW, Chock TM. Body image 2.0: associations between social grooming on Facebook and body image concerns. Comput Human Behav. 2015;48:331-339. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22.Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Pugliese MT, Lifshitz F, Grad G, Fort P, Marks-Katz M. Fear of obesity. a cause of short stature and delayed puberty. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(9):513-518. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198309013090901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Udo T, Grilo CM. Prevalence and correlates of DSM-5–defined eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84(5):345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.03.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Carta MG, Preti A, Moro MF, et al. Eating disorders as a public health issue: prevalence and attributable impairment of quality of life in an Italian community sample. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014;26(4):486-492. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.927753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Lee SM, Hong M, Park S, Kang WS, Oh IH. Economic burden of eating disorders in South Korea. J Eat Disord. 2021;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00385-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Schaub MP. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):299-307. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Salehan M, Negahban A. Social networking on smartphones: when mobile phones become addictive. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(6):2632-2639. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29.Korea Information Society Development Institute Statistics (KISDI STAT) . Mobile phone possession and use status: smartphone ownership rate. Korea media panel survey. Korea Information Society Development Institute; 2021. Accessed November 30, 2021. https://stat.kisdi.re.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=405&tblId=DT_405001_I008&conn_path=I2
30.Smolak L. Body image in children and adolescents: where do we go from here? Body Image. 2004;1(1):15-28. doi: 10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00008-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Griffiths S, Stefanovski A. Thinspiration and fitspiration in everyday life: an experience sampling study. Body Image. 2019;30:135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.O’Dea JA, Caputi P. Association between socioeconomic status, weight, age and gender, and the body image and weight control practices of 6- to 19-year-old children and adolescents. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(5):521-532. doi: 10.1093/her/16.5.521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Kim Y, Choi S, Chun C, Park S, Khang YH, Oh K. Data resource profile: the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey (KYRBS). Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(4):1076-1076e. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency . Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 2017 Korean National Growth Chart for children and adolescents. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2018. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/sub08/sub08_02.do
36.Kim JH, Yun S, Hwang SS, et al. ; Committee for the Development of Growth Standards for Korean Children and Adolescents; Committee for School Health and Public Health Statistics, the Korean Pediatric Society; Division of Health and Nutrition Survey, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . The 2017 Korean National Growth Charts for children and adolescents: development, improvement, and prospects. Korean J Pediatr. 2018;61(5):135-149. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2018.61.5.135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare . Physical activity guidelines for Koreans. Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2013. Accessed October 12, 2020. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=032901&CONT_SEQ=337139
38.An AB. Performing logistic regression on survey data with the new surveylogistic procedure. SAS Institute; 2002. Accessed May 24, 2020. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/sugi27/p258-27.pdf
39.SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 14.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute; 2016. Accessed May 24, 2020. http://documentation.sas.com/doc/en/statcdc/14.2/statug/titlepage.htm [Google Scholar]
40.Rodgers RF, Melioli T, Laconi S, Bui E, Chabrol H. Internet addiction symptoms, disordered eating, and body image avoidance. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(1):56-60. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.1570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Park S, Lee Y. Associations of body weight perception and weight control behaviors with problematic internet use among Korean adolescents. Psychiatry Res. 2017;251:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Hetzel-Riggin MD, Pritchard JR. Predicting problematic internet use in men and women: the contributions of psychological distress, coping style, and body esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14(9):519-525. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Yang H, Wang JJ, Tng GYQ, Yang S. Effects of social media and smartphone use on body esteem in female adolescents: testing a cognitive and affective model. Children (Basel). 2020;7(9):148. doi: 10.3390/children7090148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Lim JS, Chock TM, Golan GJ. Consumer perceptions of online advertising of weight loss products: the role of social norms and perceived deception. Journal of Marketing Communications. 2020;26(2):145-165. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2018.1469543 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
45.Avery RJ, Cawley JH, Eisenberg M, Cantor JH. Raising red flags: the change in deceptive advertising of weight loss products after the Federal Trade Commission’s 2003 Red Flag initiative. J Public Policy Mark. 2013;32(1):129-139. [Google Scholar]
46.Ribeiro MH, Ottoni R, West R, Almeida VAF, Meira W. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. arXiv. Preprint posted online August 22, 2019. Updated October 21, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1908.08313 [DOI]
47.Slater A, Halliwell E, Jarman H, Gaskin E. More than just child’s play?: an experimental investigation of the impact of an appearance-focused internet game on body image and career aspirations of young girls. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(9):2047-2059. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0659-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Tiggemann M, Slater A. Thin ideals in music television: a source of social comparison and body dissatisfaction. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35(1):48-58. doi: 10.1002/eat.10214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Bell BT, Lawton R, Dittmar H. The impact of thin models in music videos on adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction. Body Image. 2007;4(2):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Mulgrew KE, Volcevski-Kostas D, Rendell PG. The effect of music video clips on adolescent boys’ body image, mood, and schema activation. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43(1):92-103. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9932-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Matthews NL, Lynch T, Martins N. Real ideal: investigating how ideal and hyper-ideal video game bodies affect men and women. Comput Human Behav. 2016;59:155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
52.de Vries DA, Vossen HGM, van der Kolk-van der Boom P. Social media and body dissatisfaction: investigating the attenuating role of positive parent-adolescent relationships. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;48(3):527-536. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0956-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Harrison K, Hefner V. Virtually perfect: image retouching and adolescent body image. Media Psychol. 2014;17(2):134-153. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2013.770354 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
54.Darling S, Uytman C, Allen RJ, Havelka J, Pearson DG. Body image, visual working memory and visual mental imagery. PeerJ. 2015;3:e775. doi: 10.7717/peerj.775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Kaewpradub N, Kiatrungrit K, Hongsanguansri S, Pavasuthipaisit C. Association among internet usage, body image and eating behaviors of secondary school students. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2017;29(4):208-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Elmore KC, Scull TM, Kupersmidt JB. Media as a “super peer”: how adolescents interpret media messages predicts their perception of alcohol and tobacco use norms. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(2):376-387. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0609-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Strasburger VC. Children, adolescents, and the media. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2004;34(2):54-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2003.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Reid Chassiakos YL, Radesky J, Christakis D, Moreno MA, Cross C; Council on Communications and Media . Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5):e20162593. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Gidwani PP, Sobol A, DeJong W, Perrin JM, Gortmaker SL. Television viewing and initiation of smoking among youth. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):505-508. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Van den Bulck J, Buellens K. Television and music video exposure and adolescent alcohol use while going out. Alcohol Alcohol. 2005;40(3):249-253. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Alberga AS, Withnell SJ, von Ranson KM. Fitspiration and thinspiration: a comparison across three social networking sites. J Eat Disord. 2018;6:39. doi: 10.1186/s40337-018-0227-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Kraft H, Weber JM. A look at gender differences and marketing implications. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2012;3(21):247-253. [Google Scholar]
63.Alshehri AG, Mohamed AMAS. The relationship between electronic gaming and health, social relationships, and physical activity among males in Saudi Arabia. Am J Mens Health. 2019;13(4):1557988319873512. doi: 10.1177/1557988319873512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Mérelle SYM, Kleiboer AM, Schotanus M, et al. Which health-related problems are associated with problematic video-gaming or social media use in adolescents? a large-scale cross-sectional study. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2017;14(1):11-19. [Google Scholar]
65.Bae J, Joung H, Kim JY, Kwon KN, Kim YT, Park SW. Test-retest reliability of a questionnaire for the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey. J Prev Med Public Health. 2010;43(5):403-410. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.5.403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

eTable 1. Participant Characteristics According Smartphone Use Duration, Including Adolescents Who Reported No Smartphone Use During the Past 30 Days

eTable 2. Distribution of Smartphone Use Duration (Minutes/Day) According to Individuals’ Most Frequently Used Smartphone Content Type in Male and Female Adolescents

eTable 6. Association of Smartphone Use Duration With Underperception and Overperception of Body Weight Among Male and Female Adolescents, Stratified by Body Mass Index

eTable 7. Association of Smartphone Content Type With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors With Additional Adjustment for Body Image Distortion Among Male and Female Adolescents

eTable 9. Association of Weekday and Weekend Smartphone Use Duration With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors

Click here for additional data file.^{(554.8KB, pdf)}

[zoi220391r1] 1.Silver L. Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equally. Pew Research Center. February 5, 2019. Accessed May 25, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/05/smartphone-ownership-is-growing-rapidly-around-the-world-but-not-always-equally

[zoi220391r2] 2.Park MH, Song HY. Relationship among the Korean adolescents obesity, health behavior and smart phone usage. J Korean Public Health Nurs. 2019;33:47-58. doi: 10.5932/JKPHN.2019.33.1.47 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r3] 3.De-Sola Gutiérrez J, Rodríguez de Fonseca F, Rubio G. Cell-phone addiction: a review. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:175-175. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r4] 4.Korean Statistical Information Service. Smartphone overdependence statistics, 2016-2019. Korean Statistical Information Service, 2020. Accessed May 25, 2020. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=127&tblId=DT_120019N_2016_001&conn_path=I2

[zoi220391r5] 5.Kim H, Cho MK, Ko H, Yoo JE, Song YM. Association between smartphone usage and mental health in South Korean adolescents: the 2017 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey. Korean J Fam Med. 2020;41(2):98-104. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.18.0108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r6] 6.Sohn SY, Rees P, Wildridge B, Kalk NJ, Carter B. Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2350-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r7] 7.Rotondi V, Stanca L, Tomasuolo M. Connecting alone: smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. J Econ Psychol. 2017;63:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.09.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r8] 8.Blakemore SJ, Mills KL. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:187-207. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r9] 9.Crone EA, Konijn EA. Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r10] 10.Derenne J, Beresin E. Body image, media, and eating disorders—a 10-year update. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(1):129-134. doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0832-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r11] 11.Diedrichs PC, Lee C, Kelly M. Seeing the beauty in everyday people: a qualitative study of young Australians’ opinions on body image, the mass media and models. Body Image. 2011;8(3):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r12] 12.Cafri G, Yamamiya Y, Brannick M, Thompson JK. The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol. 2005;12(4):421-433. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bpi053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r13] 13.Hsu CKJ. Selling American beauty to teen girls: a content analysis of female celebrity advertisements in Seventeen. Advertising and Society Review. 2013;14(2):e0015. doi: 10.1353/asr.2013.0015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r14] 14.Liu J. The influence of the body image presented through TikTok trend-videos and its possible reasons. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2021). Atlantis Press. June 10, 2021. Accessed February 17, 2022. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iclace-21/125957570

[zoi220391r15] 15.Hawes T, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Campbell SM. Unique associations of social media use and online appearance preoccupation with depression, anxiety, and appearance rejection sensitivity. Body Image. 2020;33:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r16] 16.Hogue JV, Mills JS. The effects of active social media engagement with peers on body image in young women. Body Image. 2019;28:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r17] 17.Jasik CB. Body image and health: eating disorders and obesity. Prim Care. 2014;41(3):519-537. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2014.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r18] 18.Choi JS, Kim JS. Mediating effect of body image distortion on weight loss efforts in normal-weight and underweight Korean adolescent girls. J Sch Health. 2017;87(3):217-224. doi: 10.1111/josh.12483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r19] 19.Neumark-Sztainer D, Paxton SJ, Hannan PJ, Haines J, Story M. Does body satisfaction matter? five-year longitudinal associations between body satisfaction and health behaviors in adolescent females and males. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r20] 20.Lee J, Lee Y. The association of body image distortion with weight control behaviors, diet behaviors, physical activity, sadness, and suicidal ideation among Korean high school students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2703-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r21] 21.Kim JW, Chock TM. Body image 2.0: associations between social grooming on Facebook and body image concerns. Comput Human Behav. 2015;48:331-339. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r22] 22.Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r23] 23.Pugliese MT, Lifshitz F, Grad G, Fort P, Marks-Katz M. Fear of obesity. a cause of short stature and delayed puberty. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(9):513-518. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198309013090901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r24] 24.Udo T, Grilo CM. Prevalence and correlates of DSM-5–defined eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84(5):345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.03.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r25] 25.Carta MG, Preti A, Moro MF, et al. Eating disorders as a public health issue: prevalence and attributable impairment of quality of life in an Italian community sample. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014;26(4):486-492. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.927753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r26] 26.Lee SM, Hong M, Park S, Kang WS, Oh IH. Economic burden of eating disorders in South Korea. J Eat Disord. 2021;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00385-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r27] 27.Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Schaub MP. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):299-307. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r28] 28.Salehan M, Negahban A. Social networking on smartphones: when mobile phones become addictive. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(6):2632-2639. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r29] 29.Korea Information Society Development Institute Statistics (KISDI STAT) . Mobile phone possession and use status: smartphone ownership rate. Korea media panel survey. Korea Information Society Development Institute; 2021. Accessed November 30, 2021. https://stat.kisdi.re.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=405&tblId=DT_405001_I008&conn_path=I2

[zoi220391r30] 30.Smolak L. Body image in children and adolescents: where do we go from here? Body Image. 2004;1(1):15-28. doi: 10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00008-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r31] 31.Griffiths S, Stefanovski A. Thinspiration and fitspiration in everyday life: an experience sampling study. Body Image. 2019;30:135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r32] 32.O’Dea JA, Caputi P. Association between socioeconomic status, weight, age and gender, and the body image and weight control practices of 6- to 19-year-old children and adolescents. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(5):521-532. doi: 10.1093/her/16.5.521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r33] 33.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r34] 34.Kim Y, Choi S, Chun C, Park S, Khang YH, Oh K. Data resource profile: the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey (KYRBS). Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(4):1076-1076e. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r35] 35.Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency . Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 2017 Korean National Growth Chart for children and adolescents. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2018. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/sub08/sub08_02.do

[zoi220391r36] 36.Kim JH, Yun S, Hwang SS, et al. ; Committee for the Development of Growth Standards for Korean Children and Adolescents; Committee for School Health and Public Health Statistics, the Korean Pediatric Society; Division of Health and Nutrition Survey, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . The 2017 Korean National Growth Charts for children and adolescents: development, improvement, and prospects. Korean J Pediatr. 2018;61(5):135-149. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2018.61.5.135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r37] 37.Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare . Physical activity guidelines for Koreans. Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2013. Accessed October 12, 2020. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=032901&CONT_SEQ=337139

[zoi220391r38] 38.An AB. Performing logistic regression on survey data with the new surveylogistic procedure. SAS Institute; 2002. Accessed May 24, 2020. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/sugi27/p258-27.pdf

[zoi220391r39] 39.SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 14.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute; 2016. Accessed May 24, 2020. http://documentation.sas.com/doc/en/statcdc/14.2/statug/titlepage.htm [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r40] 40.Rodgers RF, Melioli T, Laconi S, Bui E, Chabrol H. Internet addiction symptoms, disordered eating, and body image avoidance. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(1):56-60. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.1570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r41] 41.Park S, Lee Y. Associations of body weight perception and weight control behaviors with problematic internet use among Korean adolescents. Psychiatry Res. 2017;251:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r42] 42.Hetzel-Riggin MD, Pritchard JR. Predicting problematic internet use in men and women: the contributions of psychological distress, coping style, and body esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14(9):519-525. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r43] 43.Yang H, Wang JJ, Tng GYQ, Yang S. Effects of social media and smartphone use on body esteem in female adolescents: testing a cognitive and affective model. Children (Basel). 2020;7(9):148. doi: 10.3390/children7090148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r44] 44.Lim JS, Chock TM, Golan GJ. Consumer perceptions of online advertising of weight loss products: the role of social norms and perceived deception. Journal of Marketing Communications. 2020;26(2):145-165. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2018.1469543 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r45] 45.Avery RJ, Cawley JH, Eisenberg M, Cantor JH. Raising red flags: the change in deceptive advertising of weight loss products after the Federal Trade Commission’s 2003 Red Flag initiative. J Public Policy Mark. 2013;32(1):129-139. [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r46] 46.Ribeiro MH, Ottoni R, West R, Almeida VAF, Meira W. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. arXiv. Preprint posted online August 22, 2019. Updated October 21, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1908.08313 [DOI]

[zoi220391r47] 47.Slater A, Halliwell E, Jarman H, Gaskin E. More than just child’s play?: an experimental investigation of the impact of an appearance-focused internet game on body image and career aspirations of young girls. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(9):2047-2059. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0659-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r48] 48.Tiggemann M, Slater A. Thin ideals in music television: a source of social comparison and body dissatisfaction. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35(1):48-58. doi: 10.1002/eat.10214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r49] 49.Bell BT, Lawton R, Dittmar H. The impact of thin models in music videos on adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction. Body Image. 2007;4(2):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r50] 50.Mulgrew KE, Volcevski-Kostas D, Rendell PG. The effect of music video clips on adolescent boys’ body image, mood, and schema activation. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43(1):92-103. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9932-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r51] 51.Matthews NL, Lynch T, Martins N. Real ideal: investigating how ideal and hyper-ideal video game bodies affect men and women. Comput Human Behav. 2016;59:155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r52] 52.de Vries DA, Vossen HGM, van der Kolk-van der Boom P. Social media and body dissatisfaction: investigating the attenuating role of positive parent-adolescent relationships. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;48(3):527-536. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0956-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r53] 53.Harrison K, Hefner V. Virtually perfect: image retouching and adolescent body image. Media Psychol. 2014;17(2):134-153. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2013.770354 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r54] 54.Darling S, Uytman C, Allen RJ, Havelka J, Pearson DG. Body image, visual working memory and visual mental imagery. PeerJ. 2015;3:e775. doi: 10.7717/peerj.775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r55] 55.Kaewpradub N, Kiatrungrit K, Hongsanguansri S, Pavasuthipaisit C. Association among internet usage, body image and eating behaviors of secondary school students. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2017;29(4):208-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r56] 56.Elmore KC, Scull TM, Kupersmidt JB. Media as a “super peer”: how adolescents interpret media messages predicts their perception of alcohol and tobacco use norms. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(2):376-387. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0609-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r57] 57.Strasburger VC. Children, adolescents, and the media. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2004;34(2):54-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2003.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r58] 58.Reid Chassiakos YL, Radesky J, Christakis D, Moreno MA, Cross C; Council on Communications and Media . Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5):e20162593. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r59] 59.Gidwani PP, Sobol A, DeJong W, Perrin JM, Gortmaker SL. Television viewing and initiation of smoking among youth. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):505-508. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r60] 60.Van den Bulck J, Buellens K. Television and music video exposure and adolescent alcohol use while going out. Alcohol Alcohol. 2005;40(3):249-253. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r61] 61.Alberga AS, Withnell SJ, von Ranson KM. Fitspiration and thinspiration: a comparison across three social networking sites. J Eat Disord. 2018;6:39. doi: 10.1186/s40337-018-0227-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r62] 62.Kraft H, Weber JM. A look at gender differences and marketing implications. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2012;3(21):247-253. [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r63] 63.Alshehri AG, Mohamed AMAS. The relationship between electronic gaming and health, social relationships, and physical activity among males in Saudi Arabia. Am J Mens Health. 2019;13(4):1557988319873512. doi: 10.1177/1557988319873512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r64] 64.Mérelle SYM, Kleiboer AM, Schotanus M, et al. Which health-related problems are associated with problematic video-gaming or social media use in adolescents? a large-scale cross-sectional study. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2017;14(1):11-19. [Google Scholar]

[zoi220391r65] 65.Bae J, Joung H, Kim JY, Kwon KN, Kim YT, Park SW. Test-retest reliability of a questionnaire for the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey. J Prev Med Public Health. 2010;43(5):403-410. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.5.403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Association of Smartphone Use With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors in Korean Adolescents

Sohyeon Kwon, MPH

Rockli Kim, ScD

Jong-Tae Lee, PhD

Jinho Kim, PhD

Sunmi Song, PhD

Seongcheol Kim, PhD

Hannah Oh, ScD

Key Points

Question

Findings

Meaning

Abstract

Importance

Objective

Design, Setting, and Participants

Exposures

Main Outcomes and Measures

Results

Conclusions and Relevance

Introduction

Methods

Study Population

Assessment of Smartphone Use

Assessment of Body Image Distortion

Assessment of Weight Loss Behaviors

Statistical Analysis

Results

Participant Characteristics

Table 1. Participant Characteristics by Duration of Smartphone Use (N = 53 133).

Duration of Smartphone Use

Table 2. Association of Duration of Smartphone Use With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors in Male and Female Adolescents.

Content Types of Smartphone Use

Table 3. Association of Smartphone Content With Body Image Distortion and Weight Loss Behaviors in Male and Female Adolescents.

Discussion

Strengths and Limitations

Conclusions

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases