Abstract
Purpose of Review
To summarise and analyse the current knowledge of CGRP metabolism in childhood and adolescence and its role in childhood and adolescence migraine.
Recent Findings
Influencing CGRP pathways is nowadays one of the main mechanisms to treat migraine. In adults, several clinical trials with different drug classes have supported this finding. However, only very little is known on these mechanisms in children and adolescents with migraine. Based on a literature search, it can be concluded that substantial parts of the CGRP pathways are already developed and working in the preterm fetus of animals. Newborn animals show high CGRP levels and high density of CGRP positive neurons and nerve fibres. In human studies, increased levels of CGRP were observed in childhood and adolescent migraine patients. Remedies based on influencing CGRP metabolism are also working in that age group. For triptans, this has clearly been shown; for gepants, no data are available, and for CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies, positive evidence is only available from case series.
Summary
Only very little is known on CGRP metabolism in childhood and adolescence. However, placebo-controlled clinical trials both on CGRP antagonists and on CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies are under way and will show in some years whether these drug classes are efficacious also in children and adolescents.
Keywords: Migraine, Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), Triptans, Gepants, Antibodies
Introduction
Calcitonin gene-related-peptide (CGRP) has become the central molecule and neuropeptide in the basic and clinical research on migraine in the last decades. Since the late 1980s, a lot of knowledge has been accumulated and we understand many although not all mechanisms of CGRP in migraine, and we know several drugs working efficiently against migraine via the CGRP pathway. However, all this research has been performed in adults, and only very little is known about specific mechanisms, pathways, and clinical results in childhood and adolescence migraine. The aim of this review is to give an overview on the role of CGRP in childhood and adolescence if different from adults and on CGRP mechanisms in the treatment of migraine in childhood and adolescence.
Based on a literature search in MedLine and Embase with the search terms “child*”, “adolescen*”, “CGRP”, and “migraine”, findings on the role of CGRP in this context were collected and analysed. Since there is only very little known on the specific aspects of CGRP in childhood and adolescence, this can only be a short narrative review.
Findings in Animal Models
In 2003, Dong et al. could show that two of the CGRP-A receptor components, CRLR and RAMP1, are expressed in rat placenta [1]. The primary distribution of CRLR and RAMP1 is, among others, in the cytotrophoblast and syncytium in the labyrinth, in trophoblastic giant cells, and in the endothelium and smooth muscle cells of fetal vessels. Before, this group had demonstrated the expression of CGRP-B receptors in rat placenta and its regulation by steroid hormones [2]. In addition to the CGRP-B receptor, the CGRP-A receptors are also present in the rat placenta. Similar to the CGRP-B receptors, levels of CGRP-A receptor components in the placenta are increased with advancing gestation and decreased at term labour. However, the source of CGRP in the feto-placental circulation is not clear. Reports have shown that CGRP concentrations in cord blood are higher than those in the mother’s plasma at term [3]. Therefore, it is possible that CGRP in the fetal circulation is derived from sensory neurons of the fetus himself, or even from the placenta itself. This would mean that the fetus is already able to produce and release CGRP before term.
One of the first studies investigating the developmental changes occurring to peptidergic sensory neurons was performed in the ageing guinea pig. It was discovered that the density of peptidergic neurons surrounding the mesenteric and carotid arteries increase with fetal development, with a peak at birth. The nerve plexuses containing CGRP then decline with age, going down to about half-maximum density once the animal had reached two years of age [4]. Similarly, a study investigating peptidergic innervation of the ageing rat aorta showed that CGRP-positive neuronal fibres were present in animals younger than six months, but gradually disappeared to complete absence when animals reached one year of age [5]. In aged female rats, circulating levels of CGRP have been shown to decline slightly compared with younger animals, and the amount of bioavailable CGRP detected within the mesenteric vascular bed showed an even more profound decline. Supplementation of female sex steroid hormones was able to reverse this reduction in CGRP availability [6].
After capsaicin instillation, adolescent rats showed a comparable trigeminal neuronal activation as adult rats; however, the responsiveness to peripheral trigeminovascular stimulation was lower than in adult rats, including CGRP immunoreactivity in the trigeminal ganglion, protein extravasation, and CGRP depletion in the dura mater [7]. The age-dependent differences in responsiveness to trigeminovascular stimulation in the intracisternal capsaicin-induced migraine model of rats might reflect the lower severity of migraine in pediatric patients.
When examining the distribution of CGRP by indirect immunofluorescence technique, it was found that in the Gasserian ganglion and spinal nucleus of the human trigeminal nerve, CGRP is present, among others, in almost 50% of primary sensory neurons [8]. Morphometric analysis revealed that the CGRP-positive neuronal population is heterogeneous in cell size. The percentage of CGRP-immunoreactive positive cells reached a maximum at perinatal stages, then remained constant, and declined in old age. Pericellular basket-like nerve fibres were detectable only in fetal and pre-term and full-term newborn tissue.
Findings in Children and Adolescents
CGRP release in migraine attacks of adults was one of the first clinical findings regarding CGRP homoeostasis in migraine [9]. Higher CGRP levels in adult migraine patients compared to healthy control subjects have also been shown between attacks [10].
This has also been shown for children and adolescents [11–13]. In the most recent study, the mean plasma CGRP level in young migraine patients during (291 + / − 60 pg/ml) or between (240 + / − 48 pg/ml) migraine attacks was higher than in other headache patients (51 + / − 5 pg/ml; p = 0.006 and 0.018, respectively) and in controls (53 ± 6 pg/ml; p = 0.016 and 0.045, respectively). Young patients with high migraine frequency had higher plasma CGRP levels (364 + / − 62 pg/ml) than those with low migraine frequency (183 + / − 54 pg/ml) (p = 0.031). It was concluded that the plasma CGRP level can differentiate migraine from non-migraine headache [13]. These results might be relevant for young children who cannot clearly describe their headache symptoms. The results may also provide new insights into the clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric migraine. However, another study could not replicate the finding of increased CGRP levels in pediatric migraine patients both not in the interval and not in the attack [14].
Measurement of salivary CGRP has been proposed as a non-invasive biomarker in healthy subjects [15] and in migraine patients [16]. The possibility of measuring CGRP in salivary samples has also been shown in children and adolescents [17]. However, there was no clear correlation between blood and salivary CGRP level. Following a complementary intervention (forced breathing), children showed a sympathetic output leading to a decrease of salivary CGRP, of heart rate, and of systolic blood pressure.
Triptans probably work via blocking release of CGRP. This has been suggested by clinical studies in adults [18]. If triptans work also in children, this would therefore be an argument that CGRP metabolism does also play a role in childhood and adolescence migraine pathophysiology. The first clinical studies on the efficacy of triptans in childhood were negative [19]. Therefore, it was believed that the CGRP metabolism does not play a major role in childhood migraine. However, it was also found that a high placebo response in children and adolescents might be responsible for the first negative placebo-controlled clinical triptan-trials on migraine in children and adolescents. Later studies, however, after adapting the study design to the high placebo response, could show a significant efficacy of triptans also in children and adolescence [20]. This supports the finding that CGRP pathways are highly developed in childhood and adolescence and that these pathways might be important for migraine in that age group. Lasmiditan, a novel antimigraine drug also blocking central CGRP release [21], has been shown to be safe and well tolerated in a small sample of adolescents with migraine [22].
No published data on children and adolescents could be found for the gepants which have recently been developed as small molecule CGRP antagonist against migraine. However, studies are registered in clinical trial databases (see Table 1) and it might be in some years that we will see data on the use of gepants in children and adolescents.
Table 1.
Planned or recruiting studies on migraine treatment with a CGRP antagonist or a CGRP ligand/receptor antibody in the EudraCT and in the ClinicalTrials.gov databases (some trials are registered in both databases). Last access December 23, 2021
| EudraCT number: | Title of the trial: |
|---|---|
| 2018–000923-15 | Full Title: A phase I, randomized, open-label, multiple-dose study to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of AMG 334 in children and adolescents with migraine |
| 2020–003517-35 | Full Title: Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, group sequential, placebo-controlled study to assess efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the treatment of migraine (with or without aura) in children |
| 2017–002397-39 | A phase 3, Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab in children (6 to < 12 years) and adolescents (12 to < 18 years) with episodic migraine |
| 2017–002399-23 | A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab in children (6 to < 12 years) and adolescents (12 to < 18 years) with chronic migraine |
| 2018–004622-28 | A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of galcanezumab in adolescent patients 12 to 17 years of age with chronic migraine – the REBUILD-2 study |
| 2018–000734-35 | A single-dose, open-label study to characterize the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of subcutaneous administration of fremanezumab in pediatric migraine patients (6 to 11 years of age … |
| 2019–002056-16 | A multicenter, open-label study evaluating the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of monthly subcutaneous administration of fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chron |
| ClinicalTrials.gov number: | Title of the trial: |
| NCT05127954 | Long-term extension study to assess safety and tolerability of oral ubrogepant tablets for the acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents (ages 6–17) |
| NCT04537429 | A study in children and young people with migraine to learn what the body does to eptinezumab |
| NCT05125302 | Study to assess adverse events and disease activity of oral ubrogepant tablets for the acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents (ages 6–17) |
| NCT04743141 | Long-term safety study of rimegepant in pediatric subjects for the acute treatment of migraine |
| NCT05164172 | A study with eptinezumab in children and adolescents (6 to 17 years) with chronic or episodic migraine |
| NCT05156398 | Efficacy and safety study of rimegepant for the preventative treatment of migraine in pediatric subjects |
| NCT03832998 | Efficacy and safety of erenumab in pediatric subjects with chronic migraine (OASIS (CM)) |
| NCT03836040 | Efficacy and safety of erenumab in pediatric subjects with episodic migraine (OASIS (EM)) |
| NCT04965675 | A study with eptinezumab in adolescents (12–17 years) with chronic migraine (PROSPECT-2) |
| NCT04530110 | A study to test if fremanezumab is effective in preventing migraine in children and adolescents |
| NCT03499119 | AMG 334 20,160,172 pediatric migraine PK study |
| NCT04616326 | A study of galcanezumab (LY2951742) in participants 12 to 17 years of age with chronic migraine (REBUILD-2) |
| NCT03432286 | A study of galcanezumab (LY2951742) in participants 6 to 17 years of age with episodic migraine (REBUILD-1) |
| NCT04458857 | A study to test if fremanezumab is effective in preventing episodic migraine in patients 6 to 17 years of age |
| NCT04464707 | A study to test if fremanezumab is effective in preventing chronic migraine in patients 6 to 17 years of age |
In addition, it has to be noted that no data are available on the effect of CGRP or of CGRP modifying drugs on puberty. Also, accompanying symptoms such as photophobia and phonophobia are probably not related to CGRP. This aspect is important since children and adolescents show often lower severity of these symptoms.
CGRP Ligand/Receptor Antibodies in Children and Adolescents
The four CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies which have been developed for the treatment of migraine in adults have not been studied and therefore not been approved for the use of patients under the age of 18. Clinical trials for that age group are under way (see Table 1), but no placebo-controlled trial has been published yet.
In preparation of such clinical trials, the dosage of the CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies in children and adolescents had to be determined. Pediatric pharmacokinetic studies of the antibodies have been finished, are planned, or are ongoing. In a phase 1 study on fremanezumab, children 6 to 11 years of age and weighing 17 to 45 kg received a single subcutaneous dose of 75 mg [23••]. The pharmacokinetic data were then used to refine the adult model and create concentration–time profiles in a virtual pediatric population resulting in an appropriate subcutaneous injection dose of fremanezumab 120 mg monthly in pediatric patients weighing less than 45 kg.
As reported above, data from placebo-controlled trials on children and adolescents are not available. In such trials, it would be important to use also age-specific patient related outcome measures such as the pedMIDAS.
However, in an open multicentre retrospective chart review, 112 adolescents who had received at least one dose of a CGRP ligand/receptor antibody were analysed [24]. Mean age at first dose was 15.9 years. They had chronic migraine (n = 94), new daily persistent headache (n = 12), and persistent post-traumatic headache (n = 6). At first follow-up visit, there was a significant reduction in headache frequency compared with baseline by − 2.0 days. Significant benefit with respect to headache days and to functional improvement was reached by 22% to 30% within two follow-ups. Side effects were similar to those seen in adults (injection site reaction, constipation). Another small case series reported significant improvement of migraine in 50% of adolescent patients by erenumab [25••].
In order to prepare the use of CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies in childhood and adolescence migraine, a US American manuscript written by members of the Pediatric & Adolescent Headache special interest group of the American Headache Society was published and meant to serve as expert opinion [26]. It reported recommendations on the use of CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies in children and adolescents. This consortium did not completely deny the use of these antibodies in this age group although they are not approved, but they gave the recommendations listed in Table 2. Interestingly, the use recommendations were not restricted to migraine but also other chronic headache disorder such as cluster headache, new daily persistent headache (NDPH), and persistent headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head were considered.
Table 2.
Recommendations of a special interest group of the American Headache Society for the use of CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies in children and adolescents [26]
| Indications |
|---|
| ≥ 8 headache days per month |
| PedMIDAS score ≥ 30 |
| Failure of ≥ 2 preventive therapies (pharmacologic, nutraceutical, and/or non-pharmacologic) |
| Post-pubertal adolescent, or pre-pubertal child in selected cases |
| Contraindications |
| Disturbed blood–brain barrier (e. g. recent history of meningitis, recent neurosurgery) |
| Severe cardiovascular disease, stroke |
| Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, or breast-feeding |
| Monitoring |
| Pubertal status |
| Bone health, consider checking vitamin D status |
| Linear growth |
| Weight/BMI |
| Infections |
| Pregnancy status |
The authors of this paper conclude that, until studies in children and adolescents are completed, CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies should be considered “primarily for post-pubertal adolescents experiencing relatively frequent migraine (i. e. ≥ 8 headache days per month) with moderate or severe migraine-related disability (as measured by PedMIDAS or other validated instruments). In the event that a younger child has severe chronic migraine that has proven refractory to multiple migraine preventive trials, it would be reasonable to consider” CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies with a careful monitoring.
Conclusions
Based on this short review, it can be concluded that substantial parts of the CGRP pathways are already developed and working in the preterm fetus. Young animals show a high CGRP level and a high density of CGRP positive neurons and nerve fibres. This is also probably true for children and adolescents. In human studies, increased levels of CGRP were observed in childhood and adolescent migraine patients. Therefore, it can be assumed that remedies based on influencing CGRP metabolism are also working in that age group. Furthermore, it is not unlikely that children and adolescents need higher body weight adjusted doses of anti-CGRP drugs compared to adults.
For triptans, it has already been shown that they work in younger ages, for gepants, no data are available, and for CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies, positive evidence is only available from case series. However, placebo-controlled clinical trials both on CGRP antagonists and on CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies are under way and will show in some years whether these drug classes are efficacious also in children and adolescents. Until that time, children and adolescents should be treated with gepants or with CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies only in clinical trials or if they suffer from very severe migraine and are refractory to all conventional migraine prophylactic drugs.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank Karl Messlinger for helpful input and comments.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest. This manuscript was not supported by any company or other commercial influences. The author is speaking for and member of advisory boards for the following companies (past three years): Lilly; Lundbeck; Novartis; Perfood; Teva.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the authors.
Footnotes
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Childhood and Adolescent Headache
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
- 1.Dong YL, Vegiraju S, Chauhan M, Yallampalli C. Expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor components, calcitonin receptor-like receptor and receptor activity modifying protein 1, in the rat placenta during pregnancy and their cellular localization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9:481–490. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gag058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dong YL, Vegiraju S, Gangula PR, et al. Expression and regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor in rat placentas. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:1321–1326. doi: 10.1093/biolreprod/67.4.1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parida SK, Schneder DB, Stoss TD, et al. Elevated circulating calcitonin gene-related peptide in umbilical cord and infant blood associated with maternal and neonatal sepsis and shock. Pediatr Res. 1998;43:276–282. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199802000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dhall U, Cowen T, Haven AJ, Burnstock G. Perivascular noradrenergic and peptidecontaining nerves show different patterns of changes during development and ageing in the guinea-pig. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1986;16:109–126. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(86)90003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Connat JL, Busseuil D, Gambert S, Ody M, Tebaldini M, Gamboni S, Faivre B, Quiquerez AL, Millet M, Michaut P, Rochette L. Modification of the rat aortic wall during ageing: possible relation with decrease of peptidergic innervation. Anat Embryol. 2001;204:455–468. doi: 10.1007/s429-001-8002-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gangula PR, Chauhan M, Reed L, Yallampalli C. Age-related changes in dorsal root ganglia, circulating and vascular calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) concentrations in female rats: effect of female sex steroid hormones. Neurosci Lett. 2009;454:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fan PC, Kuo PH, Hu JW, Chang SH, Hsieh ST, Chiou LC. Different trigemino-vascular responsiveness between adolescent and adult rats in a migraine model. Cephalalgia. 2012;32:979–990. doi: 10.1177/0333102412455710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Quartu M, Diaz G, Floris A, Lai ML, Priestley JV, Del Fiacco M. Calcitonin gene-related peptide in the human trigeminal sensory system at developmental and adult life stages: immunohistochemistry, neuronal morphometry and coexistence with substance P. J Chem Neuroanat. 1992;5:143–157. doi: 10.1016/0891-0618(92)90040-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, Ekman R. Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:183–187. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cernuda-Morollón E, Larrosa D, Ramón C, Vega J, Martínez-Camblor P, Pascual J. Interictal increase of CGRP levels in peripheral blood as a biomarker for chronic migraine. Neurology. 2013;81:1191–1196. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a6cb72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gallai V, Sarchielli P, Floridi A, Franceschini M, Codini M, Glioti G, Trequattrini A, Palumbo R. Vasoactive peptide levels in the plasma of young migraine patients with and without aura assessed both interictally and ictally. Cephalalgia. 1995;15:384–390. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-29821995.1505384.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fan PC, Kuo PH, Chang SH, Lee WT, Wu RM, Chiou LC. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide in diagnosing and predicting paediatric migraine. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:883–890. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01816.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fan PC, Kuo PH, Lee MT, Chang SH, Chiou LC. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide: a potential biomarker for diagnosis and therapeutic responses in pediatric migraine. Front Neurol. 2019;10:10. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hanci F, Kilinc YB, Kilinc E, Turay S, Dilek M, Kabakus N. Plasma levels of vasoactive neuropeptides in pediatric patients with migraine during attack and attack-free periods. Cephalalgia. 2021;41:166–175. doi: 10.1177/0333102420957588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dawidson I, Blom M, Lundeberg T, Theodorsson E, Angmar-Månsson B. Neuropeptides in the saliva of healthy subjects. Life Sci. 1997;60:269–278. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(96)00627-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cady R, Turner I, Dexter K, Beach ME, Cady R, Durham P. An exploratory study of salivary calcitonin gene-related peptide levels relative to acute interventions and preventative treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine. Headache. 2014;54:269–277. doi: 10.1111/head.12250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gershan LA, Durham PL, Skidmore J, Shimizu J, Cady RJ, Sheng X, Maloney CG. The role of salivary neuropeptides in pediatrics: potential biomarkers for integrated therapies. Eur J Integr Med. 2015;7:372–377. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L. The trigeminovascular system and migraine: studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:48–56. doi: 10.1002/ana.410330109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hämäläinen ML, Hoppu K, Santavuori P. Sumatriptan for migraine attacks in children: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Do children with migraine respond to oral sumatriptan differently from adults? Neurology 1997;48:1100–1103.
- 20.Evers S, Marziniak M, Frese A, Gralow I. Placebo efficacy in childhood and adolescence migraine: an analysis of double-blind and placebo-controlled studies. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:436–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Labastida-Ramirez A, Rubio-Beltran E, Haanes KA, Chan KY, Garrelds IM, Johnson KW, et al. Lasmiditan inhibits calcitonin gene-related peptide release in the rodent trigeminovascular system. Pain. 2020;61:1092–1099. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tsai M, Nery ESM, Kerr L, Khanna R, Komori M, Dennehy EB, Wilbraham D, Winner P. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of lasmiditan in pediatric patients with migraine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021;60:819–828. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00966-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.•• Cohen-Barak O, Radivojevic A, Jones A, Fiedler-Kelly J, Gillespie M, Brennan M, Gutman D, Rasamoelisolo M, Hallak H, Loupe P, Kessler Y, Ning X, Levi M, Ahn AH, Rabinovich-Guilatt L. Dose selection for fremanezumab (AJOVY) phase 3 pediatric migraine studies using pharmacokinetic data from a pediatric phase 1 study and a population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation approach. Cephalalgia 2021;41: 1065–1074. Largest case series on the use of CGRP ligand/receptor antibodies in children and adolescents.
- 24.Greene KA, Gentile CP, Szperka CL, Yonker M, Gelfand AA, Grimes B, Irwin SL. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody use for the preventive treatment of refractory headache disorders in adolescents. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;114:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.•• Zhao YJ, Ho KH, Wong PS. Early clinical experience with a monoclonal antibody against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor in adolescents with migraine: a case series. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2020;29: 212–214. The only paper with recommendations for the treatment of children and adolescents with CGRP ligan/receptor antibodies.
- 26.Szperka CL, VanderPluym J, Orr SL, Oakley CB, Qubty W, Patniyot I, Lagman-Bartolome AM, Morris C, Gautreaux J, Victorio MC, Hagler S, Narula S, Candee MS, Cleves-Bayon C, Rao R, Fryer RH, Bicknese AR, Yonker M, Hershey AD, Powers SW, Goadsby PJ, Gelfand AA. Recommendations on the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in children and adolescents. Headache. 2018;58:1658–1669. doi: 10.1111/head.13414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]