Abstract
Background
Globally sepsis is the most cause of neonatal death. Neonatal sepsis is the major newborn killer in Ethiopia, which accounts for more than one-third of neonatal deaths. Therefore, the study was aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of neonatal sepsis.
Methods
An institutional based cross-sectional study was employed on a total of 378 neonates admitted to the NICU of selected four hospitals. It was conducted from January 2021 to March 2021. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the prevalence of neonatal sepsis.
Results
Among neonates who enrolled in this study 188(50.1%) of them were females and 283 (75.5%) of them were in the age group of early neonatal period. The overall magnitude of neonatal sepsis in this study was 196(52.27%). From this 159(81.12%) and 37(18.88%) of neonates developed early onset neonatal sepsis and late onset neonatal sepsis, respectively. Factors such as age of neonates[AOR = 2.351, 95% CI (1.131, 4.888)], birth weight of neonate less than 2.5 kg[AOR = 2.546, 95% CI (1.875, 3.643)], multiple per digital vaginal examination[AOR =0.278, 95% CI (0.148,0.522)], history of urinary tract infection[AOR = 3.709, 95% CI (1.828–7.301)], Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF)[AOR = 0.384, 95% CI (0.152, 0.968)] and intrapartum high fever[AOR = 2.203, 95% CI (1.034, 4.692)] were the independent determinants of neonatal sepsis.
Conclusion
This study indicated that the magnitude of neonatal sepsis was found to be high. In general, this study has found that both maternal and neonatal factors had contributed to the risk of neonatal sepsis. Based on these results we recommend the healthcare providers to focus on the prevention of risk factors rather than treating the disease after it occurs.
Keywords: Neonatal sepsis, Magnitude, Predictors, Ethiopia
Highlights
-
•
Globally, sepsis is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality.
-
•
Neonatal sepsis is categorized as early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) and late onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) .
-
•
In a developing countries accurate diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is not satisfactory.
1. Background
Neonatal sepsis is the infectious etiology of newborns in the first month of their life that can be categorized as either early or late-onset neonatal sepsis [1,2]. The mortality rate of the children became increased from day to day with about 2.5 million of them were only of newborn ages. Neonatal mortality accounts for two-fifths of all deaths in under-five children with poor resources [3].
Globally the possible risk factors for newborn death were neonatal and maternal related factors [4]. The magnitude of newborn death was more prevalent in low-income countries like sub- Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America [5,6].
Premature rupture of membrane (PROM), maternal infectious etiology, gestational age<37weeks, APGAR score<7, need for artificial ventilation, not crying immediately at birth, delay in care-seeking and inexperienced health care workers are the predictors of neonatal sepsis [7,8].
In Ethiopia, about one-thirds of neonatal death was secondary to neonatal sepsis despite some modification towards the advancement of care [3,9]. The most likely predictors of mortality were preterm birth, infection, and asphyxia [10].
It has been reported that case diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis is a complex task due to unspecified symptoms and the lack of sufficient human power and facilities in Ethiopia. Therefore identification of the possible cause of neonatal sepsis can decrease the possibility of death and morbidity [11,12]. In low-resource countries like Ethiopia, there is a delay in diagnosing and management of neonatal sepsis. However, early diagnosis of sepsis is paramount in identifying the risk factors of the disease and saving the future generations [1,13].
Even though the impact of neonatal sepsis remains a public health problem in resource-limited settings like Ethiopia, there is a scanty finding on the magnitude and predictors of neonatal sepsis and no study in our study area. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
2. Patients and methods
2.1. Study area, design, and period
The hospital based cross-sectional study design was employed from January 11, 2021 to March 10, 2021 in selected hospitals of Fiche, Kuyu, Gundo Meskel, Chancho, and Muka Turi Hospitals with established and functional neonatal intensive care units. Fiche Hospital is located in Fiche town the capital town of North-shewa zone on a distance of 112 km from Addis Ababa in the north direction. Kuyu, Gundo meskel, and Muka Turi hospitals are also found in the North shewa zone of the Oromia region. On the other hand, Chancho Hospital is located in Special Zone Surrounding Finfinne about 30 km in the Northern direction. The work has been reported in line with the strengthening of the reporting of cohort studies in surgery (STROCSS) criteria [14].
2.2. Study participants and eligibility criteria
All neonates who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during the study period who had complete charts were included in this study whereas neonates who were discharged early before data collection, neonates with incomplete patient chart information, neonates who were admitted without their mothers and mothers who had hearing impairments or unable to talk were excluded.
2.3. Study variables and outcome endpoints
Neonatal sepsis was the primary outcome whereas independent variables includes socio-demographic characteristics of neonates and parents (age sex, religion, ethnicity, marital status of the parents, educational status of mother, family occupation, family monthly income, and place of residence), Maternal factors (parity, place of delivery, mode of delivery, PROM, duration of labor, ANC follow-up, the person assisting delivery, foul-smelling fluid/vaginal discharge, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, frequency of digital per-vaginal examination, history of UTI, maternal fever, history of APH and PIH/Eclampsia and neonatal factors (birth weight, gestational age, birth asphyxia, APGAR score, resuscitation at birth, immediate cry, method of oxygen administration, surgical procedures, umbilical catheterization, urinary catheterization, Naso/oropharynx tube insertion, and endotracheal tube.
2.4. Sample size determination and technique
The sample size for this particular study was determined by using the single population proportion formula and the proportion was taken from the previous literature in Ethiopia. According to a study conducted at Wolaita Sodo hospital, the prevalence of neonatal sepsis was 33.8% [15].
By considering 95% confidence interval (CI) and 5% marginal error, the sample size will be calculated as follows:
n= (Zα/2)2 P (1-P)/d2 |
n= (1.96)2 (0.338) (0.662)/ (0.05) 2 |
n = 344 |
Where n = required sample size.
Z = critical value for normal distribution at 95% confidence level which equals to1.96 (Z value at α = 0.05)
P= (Proportion of neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in the NICU with the prevalence of 33.8% from previous study.
d = 0.05 (5% margin of error); and non-response rate 10%.
-
✓
The total sample size was (344*10%) +344 = 378
A systematic random sampling technique was employed to get study subjects from neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.
2.5. Data collection process and management
A pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire and checklists were used to collect the data. The tools were developed by reviewing different works of literature. The tool was prepared in English and translated to the local languages ‘Afan Oromo’ to ensure the clarity of questions for the respondents. A pretest was conducted in Bishoftu Referral Hospital in the East Shewa zone of the Oromia region by taking 10% of our sample size that was not included in the actual study population before the actual data collection takes place. Correction on the instrument was done accordingly. Data were collected by eight [10] trained experienced B.Sc nurses and the data collection process was supervised by the principal investigators. Before the date of actual data collection, orientation was given to data collectors for two days about the data collection and how to handle the data and the content of the instrument. The information was collected during the admission of the neonate to NICU and by reviewing the registration book records in the labor ward, NICU, and gynecologic ward in each hospital.
2.6. Data processing and analysis
Data was entered into Epidata version 3.1 then it was transported to SPSS 22 version for analysis. The associations between dependent variables and independent factors were examined in logistic regression models. Bivariate analysis between dependent and independent variables was performed using binary logistic regression. To control the effect of confounding variables, multiple logistic regressions were considered. All variables with a P-value < 0.25 were entered into the multivariable logistic regression. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered as significantly associated in this model.
2.7. Ethics approval and consent-to-participate
Ethical clearance was secured from the Ethical review board of Salale University. A permission letter was provided to all hospitals for proceeding data collection. After that participants were well-oriented about the purpose and procedure of data collection, and the confidentiality and privacy were ensured. It is also clear that participation was fully based on the willingness of participants to use written consent; the name and address of the interviewee were not recorded in the questionnaire. The study protocol was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The study was registered researchregistry.com with a unique reference number of “researchregistry7723”.
2.8. Operational definitions
Neonatal sepsis: Neonates with the presence of infection or sepsis who are diagnosed either clinically or with laboratory results that are suggestive of neonatal sepsis by professionals during admission of the neonate within 0–28 days of life.
Early-onset of sepsis: Is sepsis occurring within 7 days of life after birth.
Late-onset of sepsis: Is sepsis occurring after 7 days of life.
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM): The time from membranes’ rupture to onset of delivery is more than 18 h.
Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF): Was considered if the amniotic fluid was green/brown or mixed with meconium, or appeared meconium-stained on the baby.
3. Results
3.1. Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
A total of 375 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with their index mothers were included in the study, making the response rate 99.2%. Of the total respondents, 202 (53.9%) were from urban and 173 (46.1%) were from rural residences. The majority (60.3%) of the mothers were in the age group of 20–29 years. Most of the mothers had primary 104 (27.7%) as their highest educational attainment, while only 76 (20.3%) of the respondents had completed college and above. Among neonates who enrolled in this study 188(50.1%) of them were females. Concerning the age proportion of neonates, 283 (75.5%) of them were in the age group 0–7 days (early neonatal period) and the rest 92 (24.5%) were from 8 to 28 days (late neonatal period)(Table 1).
Table 1.
Variables | Category | Frequency | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Residence | Urban | 202 | 53.9 |
Rural | 173 | 46.1 | |
Age of mothers (Years) | <20 | 18 | 4.8 |
20–24 | 129 | 34.4 | |
25–29 | 97 | 25.9 | |
30–34 | 70 | 18.7 | |
≥35 | 61 | 16.3 | |
Ethnic group | Oromo | 276 | 73.6 |
Amhara | 76 | 20.3 | |
Tigre | 7 | 1.9 | |
Others | 16 | 4.9 | |
Religion | Orthodox | 217 | 57.9 |
Protestant | 100 | 26.7 | |
Muslim | 30 | 8.0 | |
Others | 24 | 6.4 | |
Mother's Educational status | No formal Education | 92 | 24.5 |
Primary | 104 | 27.7 | |
Secondary | 103 | 27.5 | |
College and above | 76 | 20.3 | |
Mother's Occupation | House wife | 169 | 45.1 |
Merchants | 58 | 15.5 | |
Government employee | 50 | 13.3 | |
Private Employee | 54 | 14.4 | |
Others | 44 | 11.7 | |
Age of neonate | ≤7 days | 283 | 75.5 |
8–28 days | 92 | 24.5 | |
Sex of neonate | Male | 187 | 49.9 |
Female | 188 | 50.1 |
3.2. Obstetric characteristics of the mothers
Of the total mothers of the neonates, the majority of 195 (52.0%) of them were primipara and 325 (86.7%) had received antenatal care (ANC) service at least once during the recent pregnancy. The majority of mothers 243 (64.8%) gave birth with spontaneous vaginal delivery while 36 (9.6%) and 96 (25.6%) gave birth with instrument-assisted and cesarean section, respectively.
During labor, 224 (59.7%) mothers had ≥3 digital vaginal examinations (PV) and 135 (36.0%) had foul-smelling amniotic fluid. One hundred eighty-two (48.5%) of mothers had intrapartum fever during their labor. Regarding maternal risk factors, 128 (34.1%), 139 (37.1%), 130 (34.7%), 93 (24.8%), 206 (54.9%), of mothers had a history of pregnancy-induced hypertension, UTI/STI, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, APH, and PROM respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.
Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Maternal parity | Primipara | 195 | 52.0 |
Multipara | 180 | 48.0 | |
Maternal ANC follow up | Yes | 325 | 86.7 |
No | 50 | 13.3 | |
Number of ANC follow-Up | Once | 46 | 14.2 |
2-3 times | 141 | 43.4 | |
More than 3 times | 138 | 42.5 | |
Place of birth | Hospital | 236 | 62.9 |
Health center | 115 | 30.7 | |
Home | 24 | 6.4 | |
Mode of delivery | SVD | 243 | 64.8 |
Instrumental | 36 | 9.6 | |
Caesarean section | 96 | 25.6 | |
Who attends delivery | Health professional | 355 | 94.7 |
HEW | 7 | 1.9 | |
TBA | 13 | 3.5 | |
History of PROM | Yes | 206 | 54.9 |
No | 169 | 45.1 | |
Duration of PROM | <18 h | 50 | 24.3 |
≥18 h | 156 | 75.7 | |
Meconium stained amniotic fluid | Yes | 130 | 34.7 |
No | 245 | 65.3 | |
Foul smelling amniotic fluid | Yes | 135 | 36.0 |
No | 240 | 64.0 | |
Number of pervaginal examination | <3 times | 151 | 40.3 |
≥3 times | 224 | 59.7 | |
History of fever during labor | Yes | 182 | 48.5 |
No | 193 | 51.5 | |
Pregnancy-induced hypertension | Yes | 128 | 34.1 |
No | 247 | 65.9 | |
Bleeding during pregnancy/APH | Yes | 93 | 24.7 |
No | 282 | 75.2 | |
History of UTI/STI | Yes | 139 | 37.1 |
No | 236 | 62.9 |
3.3. Descriptive statistics of neonatal health-related characteristics
Among the total neonates 187 (49.9%) neonates had normal birth weight and 164 (43.7%) were of low birth weight. Regarding gestational age, 206 (54.9%) had a term (37–42 weeks), and 126 (33.6%) and 43 (11.5%) had preterm (<37 weeks) and post-term (42 weeks), respectively. The majority of the neonates (60.8%) had an APGAR score of ≤7, and 187 (49.9%) of the neonates cried at birth and 151 (40.3%) of the neonates had resuscitated at birth. One hundred seventy-six (46.9%) of the neonates were administered oxygen immediately after birth and the majority of 118 (67.0%) of them had been taken it through a nasal cannula. Of total neonates, 74 (19.7%), 137 (36.5%), 7 (1.9%), and 45 (12.0%) had endotracheal intubation, gavage feeding, an umbilical catheter inserted, and the urinary catheter inserted after birth (Table 3).
Table 3.
Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gestational age | Preterm (<37 weeks) | 126 | 33.6 |
Term (37–42 weeks) | 206 | 54.9 | |
Post-term (>42 weeks) | 43 | 11.5 | |
APGAR score | ≥7 | 147 | 39.2 |
<7 | 228 | 60.8 | |
Birth Weight at birth | <2500 gm | 164 | 43.7 |
2500-4000 gm | 187 | 49.9 | |
>4000 gm | 24 | 6.4 | |
Neonate cries immediately after birth | Yes | 187 | 49.9 |
No | 188 | 50.1 | |
Neonate resuscitated at birth? | Yes | 151 | 80.3 |
No | 37 | 19.7 | |
Oxygen requirement | Yes | 176 | 46.9 |
No | 199 | 53.1 | |
Method of oxygen administration | Intranasal catheter | 25 | 14.2 |
Mask | 33 | 18.8 | |
Nasal cannula | 118 | 67.0 | |
Endotracheal intubation? | Yes | 74 | 19.7 |
No | 301 | 80.3 | |
Naso gastirc tube insertion | Yes | 137 | 36.5 |
No | 238 | 63.5 | |
Umbilical catheter insertion | Yes | 7 | 1.9 |
No | 368 | 98.1 | |
Urinary catheter inserted | Yes | 45 | 12.0 |
No | 330 | 88.0 | |
Any congenital anomaly | Yes | 24 | 6.4 |
No | 351 | 93.6 | |
Any type of surgery done | Yes | 11 | 2.9 |
No | 364 | 97.1 |
3.4. Prevalence of neonatal sepsis
The overall magnitude of neonatal sepsis in this study was 196(52.27%). From this 159(81.12%) and 37(18.88%) of neonates developed early-onset neonatal sepsis and late-onset neonatal sepsis, respectively.
3.5. Factors associated with neonatal sepsis
In multiple logistic regressions, Neonates whose age ranged from 0 to 7 days were 2 times more likely to develop neonatal sepsis as compared to those whose age ranged from 8 to 28 days [AOR = 2.351, 95% CI (1.131, 4.888)]. Neonates who had a birth weight of less than 2.5 kg were 1.68 times highly at risk to developed sepsis compared to those who had birth a weight of more than 2.5 kg [AOR = 2.546, 95% CI (1.875, 3.643)]. Neonates born to mothers who had a history of UTI during the index pregnancy were nearly 4 times more likely to develop sepsis than those neonates born to mothers who did not have a history of UTI during the index pregnancy [AOR = 3.709, 95% CI (1.828–7.301)]. Neonates born to mothers who did not have MSAF were less likely to develop neonatal sepsis compared to those neonates born from mothers who had MSAF. [AOR = 0.384, 95% CI (0.152, 0.968)]. Neonates who were born to mothers who had fever during labor had a 2 times the risk of developing sepsis compared to their counterparts [AOR = 2.203, 95% CI (1.034, 4.692)]. Finally, neonates born to mothers who had PV examination <3 were less likely to develop neonatal sepsis compared with neonates born from mothers who had more frequent PV examination [AOR = 0.278, 95% CI (0.148,0.522)](Table 4).
Table 4.
Variables |
Category | Neonatal sepsis |
COR(95%CI) | AOR(95%CI) | P-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | |||||
Ages of neonates | 8–28 days | 37(18.88) | 55(30.73) | 1 | 1 | 0.022* |
≤7 days | 159(81.12) | 124(69.27) | 1.908 (1.181–3.075) | 2.351(1.131–4.888) | ||
Sex of neonates | Male | 105(53.57) | 82(45.81) | 1 | 1 | 0.415 |
Female | 91(46.43) | 97(54.19) | 0.733(0.488–1.100) | 1.273 (0.713–2.273) | ||
ANC follow-up | Yes | 170(86.73) | 155(86.59) | 1 | ||
No | 26(13.27) | 24(13.41) | 1.012(0.558–1.837) | |||
Parity | Multipara | 72(36.73) | 108(60.34) | 1 | 1 | 0.074 |
Primipara | 124(63.27) | 71(39.66) | 2.620(1.726–3.976) | 1.749 (0.948–3.226) | ||
Place of delivery | Home | 18(9.18( | 6(3.35) | 1 | 1 | 0.442 |
Health Institution | 178(90.82) | 173(96.65) | 0.343(0.133–0.884) | 0.593 (0.157–2.248) | ||
PROM | No | 56(28.57) | 113(63.13) | 1 | 1 | 0.473 |
Yes | 140(71.43) | 66(36.87) | 4.280 (2.774–6.605) | 1.292(0.642–2.599) | ||
Intrapartum fever | No | 51(26.02) | 142(79.33) | 1 | 1 | 0.041* |
Yes | 145(73.98) | 37(20.67) | 10.911 (6.736–17.676) | 2.203(1.034–4.692) | ||
No. of PV examination | ≥3 times | 155(79.08) | 69(38.55) | 1 | 1 | <0.001* |
<3 times | 41(20.92) | 110(61.45) | 0.166 (0.105–0.262) | 0.278 (0.148–0.522) | ||
MSAF | Yes | 84(42.86) | 46(25.69) | 1 | 1 | 0.042* |
No | 112(57.14) | 133(74.31) | 0.461 (0.297–0.715) | 0.384 (0.152–0.968) | ||
Foul smelling amniotic fluid | No | 95(48.47) | 145(81.01) | 1 | 1 | 0.387 |
Yes | 101(51.53) | 34(18.99) | 4.534 (2.843–7.232) | 1.587 (0.557–4.522) | ||
UTI/STI | No | 68(34.69) | 168(93.85) | 1 | 1 | <0.001* |
Yes | 128(65.31) | 11(6.15) | 4.749 (2.605–8.587) | 3.709 (1.828–7.301) | ||
Birth Weight at birth | NBW | 95(48.47) | 116(64.80) | 1 | 1 | |
LBW | 101(51.53) | 63(35.20) | 1.958 (1.292–2.966) | 2.546 (1.875–3.643) | 0.001* | |
Gestational age | Term | 96(48.98) | 110(61.45) | 1 | ||
Pre term | 75(38.27) | 51(28.49) | 1.059 (0.524–2.138) | |||
Post term | 25(12.76) | 18(10.06) | 0.628 (0.323–1.222) | |||
Apgar score | 7–10 | 59(30.10) | 88(49.16) | 1 | 1 | 0.629 |
<7 | 137(69.90) | 91(50.84) | 2.245 (1.471–3.428) | 1.174 (0.613–2.248) | ||
Neonate cries at birth | No | 102(52.04) | 86(43.88) | 1 | ||
Yes | 94(47.96) | 93(56.12) | 0.852 (0.568–1.278) | |||
Endotracheal intubation | No | 135(68.88) | 166(92.74) | 1 | 1 | 0.724 |
Yes | 61(31.12) | 13(7.26) | 5.770 (3.041–10.946) | 1.192 (0.449–3.161) | ||
Nasogastric tube insertion | Yes | 87 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 0.183 |
No | 109 | 129 | 0.486 (0.315–0.747) | 0.629 (0.318–1.245) |
* = P-value <0.05, CI=Confidence Interval.
4. Discussion
This study aimed to assess the magnitude and identify determinant factors of neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted into the NICU to contribute to tackling the burden of the disease and its associated problems. This study has attempted to look at the determinant factors of neonatal sepsis by incorporating as many risk factors as possible.
In this study, the overall magnitude of neonatal sepsis was 52.3%. Which was almost similar to the previous study done in Iran (51.8) [16]. The prevalence of neonatal sepsis in this study was lower compared with studies done in Shashemene town, Ethiopia (77.9%) [17] and Arbaminch, Southern Ethiopia (78.3%) [18] and higher compared with the studies done in South-eastern Mexico (24%) [19], Tanzania (31.4%) [7], Uganda (21.8%) [20] and Wolaita Sodo town, southern Ethiopia (33.8%) [15]. The reason for this difference might be due to advances in the health system nowadays that gives infuses on newborn health start from intrauterine life. In addition, the other possible reason might be due to differences in the study setting and health system setup.
The finding of this study showed that both maternal and neonatal factors had a significant effect on the risk of neonatal sepsis, though all factors did not show similar effects as findings of the previous studies.
The finding of this study showed that neonates whose age ranged from 0 to 7 days were 2 times more likely to develop neonatal sepsis as compared to those whose age ranged from 8 to 28 days [AOR = 2.351, 95% CI (1.131, 4.888)]. Similar findings were also observed in earlier studies conducted in different parts of the world, Uganda [20], Shashemene, Ethiopia [17], and Wolaita Sodo [15]. The main reason for this may be most newborns that harbor different infection agents during intrauterine life, intrapartum, and immediately after delivery show signs and symptoms during the early period (0–7 days). Neonates are very sensitive to different infection agents during the early period related to weakened immunity as compared to adults.
According to the finding of this study, neonates who had a birth weight of less than 2.5 kg were 1.68 times highly at risk to developed sepsis compared to those who had a birth weight of more than 2.5 kg [AOR = 2.546, 95% CI (1.875, 3.643)]. This finding was consistent with the studies conducted in India [21], Ghana [22], Gondar, Ethiopia [23], Jinka, Ethiopia [24], and Arbaminch, Southern Ethiopia [18]. This might be since birth weight could affect the immune status of the neonates.
This study revealed that neonates born to mothers who had a history of UTI during the index pregnancy were nearly 4 times more likely to develop sepsis than those neonates born to mothers who did not have a history of UTI during the index pregnancy [AOR = 3.709, 95% CI (1.828–7.301)]. This finding is supported by the study conducted in India [25], Ghana [22], Bishoftu, Ethiopia [26], and Mekelle, Ethiopia [27]. This might be due to late diagnosis and treatment of UTI that could result in an onset of neonatal sepsis by ascending infection of infectious agents of UTI through the vagina.
According to the finding of this study, neonates born from women without MSAF were less likely to develop neonatal sepsis compared to those neonates born from women with meconium-stained amniotic fluid[AOR = 0.384, 95% CI (0.152, 0.968)]. This finding was similar to studies conducted in Mexico [19], India [25], and Ghana [22].
The result of this study revealed that neonates who were born to mothers who had fever during labor had 2 times the risk of developing sepsis compared to their counterparts [AOR = 2.203, 95% CI (1.034, 4.692)]. This finding was consistent with other studies done in India [25], Ghana [22], Gondar, Ethiopia [28], and Mekelle, Ethiopia [27]. This might be explained by the fact that intrapartum fever is indicative of maternal infections that are frequently transmitted to the baby in utero or during passage through the canal which usually causes early-onset sepsis.
The finding of this study also showed that neonates born to mothers who had PV examination <3 were less likely to develop neonatal sepsis compared with neonates born from mothers who had more frequent PV examination [AOR = 0.278, 95% CI (0.148,0.522)]. This was in line with a study done at Wolaita sodo [15].
4.1. Strength and limitations of the study
As a strength, the study was multicenter. The retrospective nature of the study and neonates in the community were not included which may reduce the external validity of the study.
5. Conclusion
This study indicated that the magnitude of neonatal sepsis was found to be high. In general, this study has found that both maternal and neonatal factors had contributed to the risk of neonatal sepsis. Thus, careful monitoring and follow-up as well as rigorous treatment are needed; special follow-up is needed for high-risk neonates. Attention should be given to neonates delivered from women with intrapartum fever, and MSAF to prevent neonatal sepsis. Finally, pregnant women should be screened for UTIs and those diagnosed with urinary tract infections should be treated with a full course of antibiotics for the prevention of neonatal sepsis. In addition, it should be recommended that the healthcare providers decrease multiple per digital vaginal examination as not indicated should better be promoted.
Ethical approval
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Selale University, college of health science.
Source of funding
This work was funded by Selale University. The funding body did not have any role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.
Authors’ contributions
KB, FB, and DE contribute to the preparation of the proposal, methodology, and statistical analysis. MM and MD participated in preparing the first draft of the manuscript and contributed to the methodology and editing of the manuscript. All authors checked and confirmed the final version of the manuscript.
Trial registry number
-
1.
Name of the registry: RESEARCH REGISTRY, https://www.researchregistry.com
-
2.
Unique Identifying number or registration ID: researchregistry7723
-
3.
Hyperlink to the registration (must be publicly accessible): https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now#home/registrationdetails/5d70f2520791fb0011b79e9f/
Guarantor
Firomsa Bekele.
Consent for publication
Not applicable. No individual person's personal details, images, or videos are being used in this study.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declared that they have no competing interest.
Acknowledgment
We thank Selale University for providing the chance to conduct this study. Lastly, but not least our heartfelt thanks go to the North Shewa zonal health office, hospital administrators, study participants, supervisors, and data collectors for their cooperation.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103782.
Abbreviations
- ANC
Antenatal care
- AOR
Adjusted Odds Ratio
- APGAR
Activity, Pulse, Grimace, Appearance, and respiration
- CI
Confidence Interval
- COR
Crude Odds Ratio
- CSA
Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia
- C/S
Cesarean Section
- EDHS
Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey
- EOS
Early-onset sepsis
- LBW
Low birth weight
- LOS
Late-onset sepsis
- MCH
Maternal and child health
- MDG
Millennium development goal
- MSAF
Meconium stained amniotic fluid
- NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
- NICU
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
- NMR
Neonatal mortality rate
- PNC
Postnatal care
- PROM
Premature rupture of membrane
- OR
Odds Ratio
- SDG
Sustainable development goal
- SPSS
Statistical package for social sciences
- SVD
spontaneous vaginal delivery
- UNICEF
United Nations Children's Education Fund
- USAID
United States Agency for International Development
- UTI
Urinary tract infection
- WHO
World Health Organization
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
Availability of data and materials
The materials used while conducting this study are obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
- 1.Stefanovic I.M. Neonatal sepsis. Biochem. Med. 2011;21(3):276–281. doi: 10.11613/bm.2011.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cizmeci M.N., Kara S., Kanburoglu M.K., Simavli S., Duvan C.I., Tatli M.M. Detection of cord blood hepcidin levels as a biomarker for early-onset neonatal sepsis. Med. Hypotheses. 2014;82(3):310–312. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.UNICEF . 2019. The Neonatal Period Is the Most Vulnerable Time for a Child.https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/neonatal-mortality/ [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aijaz N., Huda N., Kausar S. Vol. 6. 2012. (Disease Burden of NICU in Tertiary Care Hospital). Karachi, Pakistan. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Giannoni E., et al. Neonatal Sepsis of early onset, and hospital-acquired and community-acquired late onset: a prospective population-based cohort study. J. Pediatr. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Seale A.C., et al. Estimates of possible severe bacterial infection in neonates in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America for 2012: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014;14(8):731–741. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70804-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jabiri A., Wella H., Semiono A., Sariah A., Protas J. Prevalence and factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates in Temeke and Mwananyamala Hospitals in Dares Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzan. J. Health Res. 2016;18(4):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murthy S., et al. Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berhanu D., Avan B.I. 2014. Community Based Newborn Care Baseline Survey Report Ethiopia, October 2014. Project Report. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.https://ideas.lshtm Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 10.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (Ethiopia) and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key Indicators Report. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
- 11.Lawn J.E., Cousens S., Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? where? why? Lancet. 2009;365:891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.UNICEF . 2014. Committing to Child Survival:A Promise Renewed World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser; pp. 1–100. [Google Scholar]
- 13.IAP-NNF (Indian Academy of Pediatrics-National Neonatology Forum) 2006. Management of Neonatal Sepsis Guidelines on Level II Neonatal Care; pp. 159–186. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mathew G., Agha R., for the STROCSS Group Strocss 2021: strengthening the Reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in Surgery. Int. J. Surg. 2021;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mersha A., et al. Neonatal sepsis and associated factors among newborns in hospitals of Wolaita sodo Town, southern Ethiopia. Res. Rep. Neonatol. J. 2019:9 1–8. Dove press. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rakhsha M., Pourali L., Ayati S., et al. 2016. Efective Maternal and Neonatal Factors Associated with the Prognosis of Preterm Infants in Iran Patient SafQualImprov. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Getabelew A., et al. Prevalence of neonatal sepsis and associated factors among neonates in neonatal intensive care unit at selected governmental hospitals in Shashemene town, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Int. J. Pediatr. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/7801272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mustefa A., Abera A., Aseffa A., Abathun T., Degefa N., Tadesse H., Yeheyis T. Prevalence of neonatal sepsis and associated factors amongst neonates admitted in arbaminch general hospital, arbaminch, southern Ethiopia, Medcrave. J. Pediatr. Neon. Care. 2019;10(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leal Y.A., Alvarez-Nemegyei J., Valazquez N., Pz-Baeza E., Davila-velazquez J. Risk factors and prognosis for neonatal sepsis in south-eastern Mexico: analysis of a four-year historic cohort follow up. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:1471–2393. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.John B., David M., Mathias L., Elizabeth N. Risk factors and practices contributing to newborn sepsis in a rural district of Eastern Uganda,: a cross sectional study. BMC Res. Notes. 2015;8:339. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1308-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang M., Patel A B., Hansen N I., Arlington L., Prakash A., Hibberd P L. Risk factors for possible serious bacterial infection in a rural cohort of young infants in central India. BNC publ. health. 2016:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3688-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Siakwa M., Kpikpitse D., Kpikpitse S., Semuatu M. Neonatal sepsis in rural Ghana: a case control study of risk factors in a birth cohort. Int. J. Res. Med. Health Sci. 2014;4(5) ISSN 2307–2083. [Google Scholar]
- 23.G/eyesus T, Moges F., Eshetie S., Yeshitela B., Abate E. Bacterial etiologic agents causing neonatal sepsis and associated risk factors in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0892-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ketema E., Mamo M., Miskir D., Hussen S., Boti N. Determinants of neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in a neonatal intensive care unit at Jinka General Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Nurs. Midwifery. 2019;11(3):18–24. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Santhanam S., Arun S., Rebekah G., Ponmudi N., Chandran J., Jose R., Kumar A. Perinatal risk factors for neonatal early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis after initiation of risk-based maternal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis—a case control study. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2017;5:1–5. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmx068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Woldu A., Guta M.B., Lenjisa J.L., Tegegne G.T., Tesafye G. Assessment of the incidence of neonatal sepsis, its risk factors, antimicrobials use and clinical outcomes in Bishoftu general hospital, neonatal intensive care unit, debrezeit-Ethiopia. Pediatr. Therapeut. 2014;4(4) 2161-0665. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gebremedhin D., Berhe H., Gebrekirstos K. 2015. Risk factors for neonatal sepsis in public hospitals of Mekelle city, north Ethiopia,: unmatched case control study. PLoS One. 2016;11(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yismaw E., Abebil T., Biweta A., Araya M. Proportion of neonatal sepsis and determinant factors among neonates admitted in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital neonatal Intensive care unit Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes. 2019;12:542. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4587-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The materials used while conducting this study are obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.