Skip to main content
The Neuroradiology Journal logoLink to The Neuroradiology Journal
. 2021 Jul 27;35(2):177–182. doi: 10.1177/19714009211034482

Outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Mater Dei Hospital, Malta

Kyle Cilia 1,, Reuben Grech 2, Maria Mallia 3
PMCID: PMC9130623  PMID: 34313161

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Mater Dei Hospital, Malta and compare them with international data.

Methods

A prospective review of all patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy from 2015 to the end of 2019 was performed. Eligible patients had large vessel occlusion confirmed on computed tomography angiography. Demographical data, the National Institutes of Health stroke scale at presentation, endovascular procedure details and process times were analysed. The thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score was used to assess the degree of reperfusion. A thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of 2b–3 was considered as successful recanalisation. Functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score) and mortality at 90 days were measured. Functional independence was defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less.

Results

A total of 132 patients underwent endovascular treatment, one patient was excluded due to incomplete data. The mean age was 71 (range 25–94) years, and the mean National Institutes of Health stroke scale at presentation was 14. Of the 131 patients treated, 69 received intravenous thrombolysis. Successful recanalisation (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2b–3) was achieved in 80% of patients (105/131); 53% of patients (69/131) achieved functional independence at 90 days, with a mortality of 21% at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was recorded in 16 patients (12%) There was a statistical difference in the functional independence and mortality rate in favour of the successful recanalisation group.

Conclusion

Our data are consistent with a favourable clinical outcome after successful recanalisation. Service in Malta is achieving favourable outcomes for patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke.

Keywords: Stroke, thrombectomy, Malta, recanalisation, functional, independence

Aims

The main aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) in Mater Dei Hospital, Malta and compare them with that of other international centres.

Introduction

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, responsible for about 11% of the world’s total deaths. 1 Locally, AIS is the second leading cause of death, with a mortality rate of approximately 132 men and 102 women per 100,000, accounting for 8.3% of all deaths.2,3

Malta has one acute general hospital, which provides acute stroke treatment. Mechanical thrombectomy was introduced in Malta in 2015, while the use of intravenous thrombolysis for AIS has been established as a service since 2010.

Throughout recent years, the use of endovascular treatment for AIS was fraught with controversy. In 2015, positive results were published, namely MR CLEAN, 4 ESCAPE, 5 EXTEND-IA 6 and SWIFT PRIME. 7 All of these trials showed that patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy achieved better clinical outcomes compared with thrombolysis alone. The results were reproduced in another study in 2015, REVASCAT. 8 These studies shift the concern that mechanical thrombectomy is of no significant benefit over standard medical care, as was originally published in three earlier studies in 2013.911 A meta-analysis of these studies, the HERMES collaboration, demonstrated that mechanical thrombectomy provides better outcomes to most patients, irrespective of patients’ demographics and medical history. 12

Materials and methods

This study is a prospective review of all patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy as treatment for AIS since its introduction in Mater Dei Hospital, Malta, from 2015 to the end of 2019.

Data protection clearance was obtained as per local hospital guidelines. Patients’ data were inputted in the stroke and thrombectomy registries.

A total of 132 patients underwent endovascular treatment for AIS. One patient was excluded from the study due to incomplete data. Eligible patients had large vessel occlusion confirmed on computed tomography (CT) angiography. Intravenous (IV) thrombolysis was also administered to eligible patients (alteplase at a dose of 0.9 mg/kg).

The patients’ demographic data and National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) at presentation were collected. Timings from onset of symptoms to endovascular treatment (arterial puncture), door to CT brain, and CT to puncture were calculated. Details of the endovascular procedure – occlusion site, stent retriever used, number of passes, thomboaspiration, tandem carotid stenting and degree of perfusion (using the thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score) were recorded (Table 1). A TICI score of 2b–3 was considered as successful recanalisation.

Table 1.

Endovascular procedure details.

Endovascular technique No. of patients
Stent retrieval device and size
 Solitaire 122
 No available data 9
 4 × 20 mm 47
 6 × 30 mm 75
Site of occlusion
 Proximal ICA 18
 Carotid terminus 1
 MCA 20
 M1 segment MCA 76
 M2 segment MCA 9
 ICA + MCA 5
 Basillar 2
Thromboaspiration
 No 107
 Yes 21
 No available data 3
Tandem carotid stent placement 10
No. of passes
 0 1
 1 58
 2 27
 3 10
 4 16
 5 9
 6 2
 7 1
 No available data 7

ICA: internal carotid artery; MCA: middle cerebral artery.

All patients had brain imaging 24 hours post-thrombectomy, or earlier if there were signs of neurological deterioration. Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) was defined as any intracranial bleed associated with an increase in the NIHSS score greater than 4 or death within 24 hours of treatment.

The modified Rankin scale score (mRS) at 90 days was used to assess functional outcome. Data were collected from either follow-up outpatient visits or via telephone consultations at 90 days post AIS. Functional independence was defined as mRS of 2 or less. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v24. Fisher’s exact tests were performed for significance. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Between June 2015 and December 2019, a total of 132 patients had mechanical thrombectomy, the majority performed in the most recent 2 years (Figure 1). One patient was withdrawn from the study due to incomplete data.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Number of mechanical thrombectomy procedures.

The mean age of the patients was 71 (range 25–94) years, with a female (68:63) preponderance. In the majority of the cases, the onset of symptoms occurred between 08:00 am and 04:00 pm.

Demographics and process measures are presented in Table 2. The mean NIHSS at presentation was 14. In the absolute majority, endovascular treatment was performed for anterior circulation intracranial vessel occlusion.

Table 2.

Demographics, presentation and process times.

Demographics
Total no. of patients 131
 Men 63
 Women 68
Age (years)
 Mean 71
 Range 25–94
Presentation
 NIHSS at presentation
  Mean 14
  Range 2–32
 Affected side clinically
  Right 65
  Left 64
  Other 2 – basilar occlusion
 Onset of symptoms No. of patients
 00:00–08:00 39
 08:01–16:00 48
 16:01–23:59 34
 Wake-up 4
 Unknown onset 6
 IV thrombolysis
  Yes 69 (52.7%)
  No 62 (47.3%)
 Reasons for no thrombolysis
  Onset >4.5 hours 5
  On oral anticoagulation 22
  Wake-up/unknown clear onset 10
  Recent invasive procedure 6
  Recent history of bleeding 1
  Active malignancy 6
  Head injury 2
  Low NIHSS/rapidly improving 5
  Other medical contraindications 5
Process times Mean – mins
 Door to CT 35 (range 5–218)
 CT to puncture 78 (range 11–282)
 Onset to puncture 199 (range 56 mins to 18.04 hours)

CT: computed tomography; IV: intravenous; NIHHS: National Institutes of Health stroke scale.

Intravenous thrombolysis was administered to 69 patients (52.7%). In the other 62 patients (47.3%), IV thrombolysis was contraindicated for various reasons (Table 2).

The mean time from door (time registered at the accident and emergency department) to CT brain was 35 minutes, the mean time from CT to puncture was 78 minutes, while the mean time from onset of symptoms to puncture was 199 minutes (Table 2).

Successful recanalisation (TICI 2b–3) was achieved in 80% of patients (105/131), with complete recanalisation in 73 patients (56%). Further details are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Modified Rankin scale score at 90 days.

Functional independence (mRS ≤2) at 90 days (Figure 2) was achieved in 53% of patients (69/131). Mortality at 90 days was 21% (28/131). Out of the 28 patients, the onset of stroke to death was less than 7 days in 13 patients (46%), the rest died within 30 days.

During follow-up imaging, 29 patients (22%) were found to have ICH. It was considered symptomatic in 16 patients (12%). Out of the 16 patients with symptomatic ICH, functional independence at 90 days was only achieved in one patient, while mortality at 90 days was 81% (13/16). The remaining three patients remained with significant neurological deficit and dependence (mRS 5). Using the Fisher’s exact test (P<0.0001), the difference in the clinical outcome between patients with symptomatic ICH and those without is considered to be statistically significant.

There was a shift in the distribution of the mRS score in favour of the successful recanalisation group, with 81% of patients (65/105) achieving functional independence at 90 days. In contrast, only 15% of patients (four out of 26) with unsuccessful recanalisation achieved functional independence (P<0.0001) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in the successful and unsuccessful recanalisation subgroups, with or without thrombolysis.

Subgroups Total %, (no./total no.) Functional independence (mRS <2) at 90 days %, (no./total no.) sICH %, (no./total no.) Mortality at 90 days %, (no./total no.)
Successful recanalisation (2b–3) 80.2% (105/131) 81.3% (65/105) 9.5% (10/105) 15.2% (16/105)
Unsuccessful recanalisation (0–2a) 19.9% (26/131) 15.4% (4/26) 23.1% (6/26) 46.2% (12/26)
TICI 0/1 12% (16/131) 1.5% (2/131) 1.5% (2/ 131) 6.9% (9/131)
 2a 8% (10/131) 1.5% (2/131) 3.1% (4/131) 2.3% (3/131)
 2b 24% (32/131) 16.0% (21/131) 1.5% (2/131) 5.3% (7/131)
 3 56% (73/131) 33.6% (44/131) 6.1% (8/131) 6.9% (9/131)
Thrombectomy only 47.3% (62/131) 45.2% (28/62) 9.7% (6/62) 29.0% (18/62)
Thrombolysis + thrombectomy 52.7% (69/131) 59.4% (41/69) 14.5% (10/69) 14.5% (10/69)
Overall 131 52.7% (69/131) 12.2% (16/131) 21.4% (28/131)

mRS: modified Rankin scale score; sICH: symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage; TICI: thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score.

This difference was also demonstrated in mortality rates, with a 15% (16/105) mortality rate in the successful recanalisation group and 46% (12/26) in the unsuccessful group (P=0.0022). On the other hand, the difference in the rate of symptomatic haemorrhage was not considered to be statistically significant (P=0.0886).

The mRS of patients who experienced a wake-up stroke or stroke with an unknown onset was also assessed. Out of 10 patients, four patients achieved functional independence at 90 days (40%). There was one patient with a mRS of 5 at 90 days, with a mortality of 40% (four/10).

These data also include the two posterior circulation strokes. One patient achieved a mRS of 2 while the other an mRS of 4 at 90 days. Both had successful recanalisation.

The difference in the outcomes between patients who also received IV thrombolysis compared to those in whom it was contraindicated are demonstrated in Table 2. None of the observed differences (clinical outcome, symptomatic ICH and mortality) met the criteria for statistical significance using Fisher’s exact test (P=0.1170, P=0.4363 and P=0.0550, respectively).

This study showed that functional independence is correlated with age, NIHSS at presentation, affected clinical side, recanalisation and symptomatic ICH.

Discussion

The main aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of endovascular treatment for AIS in Mater Dei Hospital, Malta and compare them with those of other international centres.

There is an exponential increase in the number of mechanical thrombectomy procedures performed per year over the past few years. This is mainly due to better education and stroke awareness, hence earlier hospital presentations and more trained and specialised healthcare professionals. In 2013, a stroke awareness campaign, ACT FAST, was launched locally. Also, a dedicated stroke nurse has been assigned since 2017.

Out of the 131 patients receiving endovascular treatment, 105 patients (80%) achieved successful recanalisation (TICI 2b–3). This compares well with the outcomes of other centres’ trials (Figure 3). Sixty-nine patients (53%) also managed to achieve functional independence at 90 days (mRS ≤2) with a mortality rate at 90 days of 21% (28/131). These outcomes also compare positively with other international centres (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Head-to-head comparison of clinical outcomes between different stroke centres.

Recanalisation, key time intervals and clinical outcomes were also in line with the multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of AIS 19 (Table 4). On the other hand, the local rate of symptomatic ICH was higher than that recommended in the quality improvement metrics (12% vs. ≤10%).

Table 4.

Summary of the suggested quality improvement metrics with comparison to local data.

Quality improvement metrics Locally
Key intervals, mean (mins)
 Door to CT 30 mins or less 35 mins
 CT to needle 110 mins or less 78 mins
Outcome metrics
 TICI 2b–3 70% or more 80%
Post procedure outcome
 Symptomatic ICH 10% or less 12%
Clinical outcome
 mRS 0–2 30% or more 53%

CT: computed tomography; ICH: intracerebral haemorrhage; mRS: modified Rankin scale score; TICI: thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score.

In all of the mechanical thrombectomy procedures performed locally, Solitaire devices were used. In two trials published in 2012, SWIFT 20 and Trevo 6, 21 second generation retrieval devices were shown to be superior to first generation devices.

The use of intravenous thrombolysis between 3 to 4.5 hours after the onset of symptoms was shown to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with AIS.22,23 Despite the fact that those patients not receiving IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were considered as ‘clinically disadvantaged’ due to their comorbidities and contraindications to thrombolysis, there was no significant difference in outcomes when compared to patients who received IV tPA together with endovascular treatment. Styczen et al. 24 documented six cases in which mechanical thrombectomy was performed in patients with pre-interventional intracranial haemorrhage post-thrombolysis. The clinical outcome of these patients was poor and thus the benefit of thrombectomy in such a cohort remains very controversial. 24

Given the favourable outcomes of patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy for AIS, the next way forward is to develop ways to make its use more reasonable and safer in higher risk cohorts, such as pregnant women. 25

All things considered, it can be concluded that the service in Malta is managing to achieve favourable outcomes for patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for AIS. The service is still being developed and aims to achieve better outcomes to continue helping patients return back to their previous functional state.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. (2020, September). www.who.int (accessed 29 September 2020).
  • 2.European Commission. State of Health in the EU, Malta, Country Health Profile 2019. (2019). https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/419468/Country-Health-Profile-2019-Malta.pdf (accessed 13 July 2021).
  • 3.SAFESTROKE.EU. The Burden of Stroke in Malta. (2020). https://www.safestroke.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/SAFE_STROKE_MALTA.pdf (accessed 13 July 2021).
  • 4.Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al.; MR CLEAN Investigators (2015). A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372: 11–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al.; ESCAPE Trial Investigators (2015). Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372: 1019–1030. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al.; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1009–1018. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al.; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2285–2295. 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al.; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2296–2306. 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, et al.; MR RESCUE Investigators. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 914–923. 10.1056/NEJMoa1212793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, et al.; SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators (2013). Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 904–913. 10.1056/NEJMoa1213701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, et al.; Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 893–903. 10.1056/NEJMoa1214300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723–1731. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McCusker MW, Robinson S, Looby S, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: the experience of a regional stroke service. Clin Radiol 2015; 70: 1408–1413. 10.1016/j.crad.2015.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rohde S, Haehnel S, Herweh C, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute embolic stroke: preliminary results with the revive device. Stroke 2011; 42: 2954–2956. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.616763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miteff F, Faulder KC, Goh AC, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy with a self-expanding retrievable intracranial stent (Solitaire AB): experience in 26 patients with acute cerebral artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1078–1081. 10.3174/ajnr.A2447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009; 40: 2761–2768. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrozella J, et al.; Interventional Management of Stroke II Investigators. Revascularization results in the Interventional Management of Stroke II trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 582–587. 10.3174/ajnr.A0843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999; 282: 2003–2011. 10.1001/jama.282.21.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell B, et al.; American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR), Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), European Stroke Organization (ESO), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS), World Stroke Organization (WSO). Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke: official journal of the International Stroke Society 2018; 13: 612–632. 10.1177/1747493018778713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al.; SWIFT Trialists. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England) 2012; 380: 1241–1249. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61384-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, et al.; TREVO 2 Trialists. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) 2012; 380: 1231–1240. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61299-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al.; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1317–1329. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1581–1587. 10.1056/NEJM199512143332401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Styczen H, Gawlitza M, Abdullayev N, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients with pre-interventional intracranial haemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis. Neuroradiol J. Epub ahead of print 12 April 2021; 19714009211009112. doi:10.1177/19714009211009112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kular S, Ram R, Balian V, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke in pregnancy. Neuroradiol J 2020; 33: 134–139. doi:10.1177/1971400919900635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Neuroradiology Journal are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES