Skip to main content
Eye logoLink to Eye
. 2022 May 25;37(1):185–186. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02109-z

Causal factors for late presentation of retinal detachment

Rodrigo Anguita 1,, Magdalene Yin Lin Ting 1, Achini Makuloluwa 1, David G Charteris 1
PMCID: PMC9130971  PMID: 35614341

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is the most common ophthalmic emergency and is a major causes of visual loss in the United Kingdom (UK) [1]. With prompt surgery RRD can be successfully repaired with good visual outcomes in ~80–90% of all cases [2]. This is in contrast to late presentation retinal detachment, which has commonly been described in low-income countries and attributed to a lack of access to healthcare, rurality and cost [3]. Recently, we have identified that late presentation retinal detachment (LPRD) continues to occur in the UK [4].

To investigate the reasons for this late presentation we conducted a telephone survey to all patients with diagnosis of LPRD, defined as RRD with loss of central vision for 4 weeks or more, presenting between August 2018 and July 2021 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Patients were asked three questions: 1) why was there a delay between onset of symptoms and clinic attendance? 2) Had you heard about retinal detachment before you suffered it? 3) Do you think that knowing about retinal detachment and its presenting symptoms could help people to attend earlier? In the subgroup of patients attending between March 2020 and April 2021, which was the critical period of COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK, we asked them one additional question: 4) did COVID-19 influence in some way the delay of the attendance? All telephone surveys were conducted by the same investigator (MT).

We identified 79 patients—50 (63%) male and 29 (34%) female. The average age was 60 years (SD 16, range 18–99): The mean onset of central visual loss was 13 weeks (SD 16, range 4–112). Within the total cohort, we were able to contact 58 patients and all agreed to answer the survey.

The results of the survey are summarised in Table 1. Overall, in the question N°1 90% of patients attributed their symptoms to no serious problem. 81% of patients had never heard about RRD and all (100%) thought that knowing about RRD and its presenting symptoms would have helped them to attend earlier, 83% of patients who answered the question N°4 declared that COVID-19 influenced the delay of their presentation.

Table 1.

Telephone survey about causal factors for late presentation of retinal detachment.

Questions Answers
1. Why there was a delay between onset of symptoms and clinic attendance?

• No concern as thought nothing serious (90%)

• Medical reasons (5%)

• Patients abroad, decided to wait until coming back (3%)

• Others (2%)

2. Had you heard about retinal detachment before you suffered it?

• Yes (19%)

• No (81%)

3. Do you think that knowing about retinal detachment and its presenting symptoms could help people to attend earlier? • Yes (100%)
4. Did COVID-19 influence in some way the delay of the attendance?

• Yes (83%)

• No (17%)

We previously noted that LPRD does not appear to be related with socioeconomic or educational status [4]. Although cases can be treated with good anatomical results, there is a high incidence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and visual outcomes are often less favourable. In addition, there is an increase in cost to patients and healthcare systems [2, 4].

Although the UK has a comprehensive vitreoretinal service, free at the point of access the continued occurrence of LPRD and the underlying reasons for this demonstrate the need for further education of the public on the symptoms of RRD and the need for prompt assessment. Ophthalmologists and in particular vitreoretinal surgeons should play a leading role in this process.

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology and the NIHR Moorfields Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author contributions

RA and DGC conceived and designed the research. RA, MYT and AM collected the data. MYT performed the survey. RA, AM and DGC analysed and interpreted the data. RA drafted the manuscript. RA, MYT, AM and DGC made critical revision of the manuscript.

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Mitry D, Charteris D, Yorston D, Siddiqui M, Campbell H, Murphy A, et al. The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of retinal detachment in Scotland: a two-year prospective population-based study. Investig Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:4963. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Patel N, Bunce C, Asaria R, Charteris D. Resources involved in managing retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retina. 2004;24:883–7. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200412000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Takkar B, Azad SV, Bhatia I, Azad RV. Late presentation of retinal detachment in India: a comparison between developing nations. Natl Med J India. 2017;30:116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anguita R, Roth J, Makuloluwa A, Shahid S, Katta M, Khalid H, et al. Late presentation of retinal detachment. Retina. 2021;41:1833–8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.


Articles from Eye are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES