Correction: BMC Genomics 23, 224 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08434-7
Following publication of the original article [1], it was reported that the authors had not cited Wang et al. [2]. Therefore, the ‘Methods’ section, ‘Availability of data and materials’ declaration and the ‘References’ are incomplete and should be revised as described below.
In the ‘Re-sequencing of selected samples, quality checking and SNP calling’ sub-section the sentence highlighted in bold has been added:
“The individual genomes from nine indigenous chicken ecotypes (n=51) and two commercial lines (n=21) were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2000 platform with a read length of 125 bp and~10.2×coverage (Additional file 1: Table S1). Whole-genome sequencing of the samples using the next-generation sequencing technique was conducted within the framework of the Global Chicken Genome Project (http://chicken.ynau.edu.cn/index/about/index.html) led by Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KIZ-CAS) and described by Wang et al. [2, 3].”
The ‘Availability of data and materials’ declaration has been revised.
The original declaration stated: “The whole genome sequencing data for all chicken individuals generated in this study have been deposited at NCBI SRA Database with accession code: PRJNA807738 or accessible through https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/ PRJNA807738. The NCBI accession numbers used in this study can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1. Furthermore, the whole genome sequencing data, BAM files, and genotypes (VCF) have been submitted in the ChickenSD database (http://bigd.big.ac.cn/chickensd/).”
The revised declaration should read: “The datasets used for the current study were from Wang et al [2]. The raw sequencing data, alignment BAM files, and genotypes (VCF) are available in the ChickenSD database (http://bigd.big.ac.cn/chickensd/)“.
Finally, Additional file 1: Table S1 has been updated and is provided in this Correction article.
The original article [1] has been updated.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1. Table S1: Sample information for each chicken (72 individuals) used in this study.
Contributor Information
Hojjat Asadollahpour Nanaei, Email: h.asadollahpour@agr.uk.ac.ir.
Ali Esmailizadeh, Email: aliesmaili@uk.ac.ir.
References
- 1.Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Kharrati-Koopaee H, Esmailizadeh A. Genetic diversity and signatures of selection for heat tolerance and immune response in Iranian native chickens. BMC Genomics. 2022;23:224. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08434-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang MS, Thakur M, Peng MS, Jiang Y, Frantz LAF, Li M, et al. 863 genomes reveal the origin and domestication of chicken. Cell Res. 2020;30:693–701. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0349-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang MS, Zhang JJ, Guo X, Li M, Meyer R, Ashari H, et al. Large-scale genomic analysis reveals the genetic cost of chicken domestication. BMC Biol. 2021;19:118. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01052-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1. Table S1: Sample information for each chicken (72 individuals) used in this study.