Content of this journal is licensed under a Abstract
Objective
Gilbert syndrome (GS) is a disease characterized by mildly elevated indirect serum bilirubin levels due to mutation in the promoter of the UGT1A1 gene, which causes a decrease in uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase enzyme activity. Gilbert syndrome should be considered based on clinical and laboratory findings in differential diagnosis, which can be supported by genetic analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical findings and UGT1A1 mutations of children with Gilbert syndrome.
Materials and Methods
Patients who were admitted to the pediatric gastroenterology clinic and who were considered to have Gilbert syndrome based on clinical and laboratory findings were included in the study. The UGT1A1 analysis was performed by Sanger sequence analysis.
Results
A total of 56 children were included in the study. A(TA)7TAA, A(TA)6TAA, and (TA)6/7 allele promoter polymorphism was detected in 75.5%, 22.5%, and 2% of the patients, respectively. Other than these, in 3 patients, 3 different sequence variants associated with GS [c.880_893delinsA (p.Tyr294MetfsTer69) and c.1091C>T(p.Pro365Leu)] were detected.
Conclusion
We detected 7 TA repeats in the majority of our patients. A mild bilirubin elevation was determined in cases with 6 repetitions that were not considered risky for Gilbert syndrome. We concluded that the c.880_893delinsA (p.Tyr294MetfsTer69) variant, previously shown to be associated with Crigler–Najjar syndrome type I, may also be associated with partial enzyme deficiency leading to the Gilbert syndrome phenotype.
Keywords: Gilbert syndrome, UDP glucuronyl transferase, polymorphism, hyperbilirubinemia
What is already known on this topic?
Gilbert syndrome (GS) is characterized by mildly elevated indirect serum bilirubin levels due to mutation in the promoter of the UGT1A1 gene. Seven or 8 thymine adenine (TA) repeats are responsible for the development of GS. Another molecular genetic etiological cause of GS is sequence variants.
What this study adds on this topic?
This study is important due to the limited Gilbert syndrome (GS) data in children in Turkey. A mild bilirubin elevation can be observed in the cases with 6 TA repetitions that were considered non-risky in terms of GS. We suggested that the variant [c.880_893delinsA (p.Tyr294MetfsTer69)] was causing partial enzyme deficiency leading to the GS phenotype.
INTRODUCTION
Gilbert syndrome (GS), which causes mild indirect hyperbilirubinemia without hemolysis or a liver disease, is an autosomal recessive genetic disease. The frequency of GS is reported to be 3%-13%.1 Hunger, insomnia, infection, and stress can trigger attacks of jaundice in GS.2 When jaundice is noticed or indirect bilirubin is detected in tests, it may cause anxiety in parents and children. Many unnecessary tests can be performed on patients to detect liver disease.
Gilbert syndrome is caused by mutation in the promoter region of UGT1A1 gene (2q37), which causes a decrease in uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase (UGT) enzyme activity. In GS and Crigler–Najjar syndrome, more than 130 UGT1A1 variants have been reported.3 The number of thymine adenine (TA) repeats determines the activity of the UGT1A1 enzyme. When the TA repeat is high, the enzyme activity is less. UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*37, and UGT1A1*36 variants have 7 TA repeats, 8 TA repeats, and 5 TA repeats, respectively (Table 1). Common polymorphic mutations in GS include a TA insertion mutation in the TATA box (A(TA)7TAA) (UGT1A1*28) and c0.211G>A (p.G71R) in exon 1 (UGT1A1*6).4,5 A(TA)7TAA is also shown as c.-53TA.6,7 (TA)6 repeats in the UGT1A1 gene promoter are considered a non-risky GS allele. Wild-type UGT1A1 contains 6 TA repeats (A(TA)6TAA) in its promoter region.8 (TA)7 and (TA)8 repeats are held responsible for the development of GS. UGT1A1*6 also contributes to the elevation of serum bilirubin but does not cause GS. The heterozygous state of UGT1A1*28 (TA)7 causes the enzyme’s activity to decrease by 25%, and its homozygous state causes decreased activity by 70%.8 This situation leads to GS, a mild form of intermittent unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia that lacks hemolysis or hepatocellular injury.9
Table 1.
Definitions of Most Often UGT1A1 Allele and TA Repeats in Gilbert syndrome
| UGT1A1 alleles | (TA)nTAA promoter repeats |
|---|---|
| UGT1A1*36 | A(TA)5TAA |
| UGT1A1*1 | A(TA)6TAA |
| UGT1A1*28 | A(TA)7TAA |
| UGT1A1*37 | A(TA)8TAA |
This study was planned due to the limited GS data in children in Turkey. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical, demographic, and genetic mutations of Turkish children with GS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Population
Patients who were admitted to the Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic between September 2017 and December 2020 and who were considered to have GS based on clinical and laboratory findings were retrospectively included in the study. Gilbert syndrome was diagnosed when the patients have isolated unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, normal liver enzymes, and no additional symptoms or signs which suggest hepatobiliary and hemolytic disease. These clinical and laboratory findings were considered sufficient for the diagnosis of GS. Genetic analysis was applied as a further investigation only when there was doubt about the diagnosis and when the diagnosis was desired to be supported and showed by genetic analysis.
The demographic data, laboratory findings, clinical findings at application, and factors triggering jaundice of these patients were obtained from medical records. It was shown that the patients did not have liver and hemolytic diseases that can cause elevated levels of indirect bilirubin. Patients who were not considered to have GS based on the results of a UGT1A1 gene analysis were excluded from the study.
Genetic Analysis
The UGT1A1 gene analysis was performed by Sanger sequencing. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes according to the manufacturer’s protocols. For the Sanger sequencing of the UGT1A1 gene, polymerase chain reaction (primers used for PCR are presented in Table 2), purification (ExoSAP‐IT®, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), and cycle sequencing PCR (BigDye® Terminator v3.1, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) reactions were carried out. Products were purified (ZR DNA Sequencing Clean‐up Kit TM, Zymo Research) and run by capillary electrophoresis (3500 Genetic Analyzer, Thermo Scientific). The DNA sequences obtained were analyzed in the Sequencing Analysis Program and compared with the reference sequences. The insertion status of TA sequence in the TATAA box of the promoter region and rare sequence variants were reported. The genetic and clinical findings of the patients were evaluated by a comparison. An ethics committee approval was obtained from the ethical committee of the SBU Tepecik Training and Research Hospital (2020/13-13).
Table 2.
Primers Used for the Sanger Sequencing of UGT1A1 Gene
| UGT1A1: ex1-1F | TCTCTGAAAGTGAACTCCCTGC |
| UGT1A1: ex1-1R | GGCACTGGGTAGCCTCAAAT |
| UGT1A1: ex1-2F | AGGACTCTGCTATGCTTTTGTCT |
| UGT1A1: ex1-2R | GCTCAGCATATATCTGGGGCT |
| UGT1A1: ex2-F | CAGGAACCCTTCCTCCTTTAGA |
| UGT1A1: ex2-R | AAGTGGCAGGGAAAAGCCAA |
| UGT1A1: ex3-F | CGGAAGTTGCCAGTCCTCAG |
| UGT1A1: ex3-R | GTGTTACTCACATGCCCTTGC |
| UGT1A1: ex4-F | TGGCCAACATATCCTACATTGC |
| UGT1A1:ex4-R | ATCATGAATGCCATGACCAAAGT |
| UGT1A1: ex5-F | TCTTCTTAAGCAGCCATGAGCA |
| UGT1A1: ex5-R | ATCAAAGACACCAGAGGGGG |
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the International Business Machines the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0 software (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA). While categorical data were expressed as number and percentage (%), continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The Shapiro–Wilk’s test was performed to examine the normality of parameters. Non-parametric and parametric continuous variables were assessed using Mann–Whitney U test and independent samples t-test, respectively. Fisher’s exact test was applied to compare the differences between 2 groups for categorical variables. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
This study included 56 children who were considered to have GS based on clinical characteristics and laboratory findings. The majority of the patients were diagnosed in the adolescent age group (mean age 13.9 ± 4.0) with overall male preponderance (male : female, 2.7 : 1). Two (6%) patients had a family history of GS. Twelve (21.4%) patients with GS had a history of parental consanguinity. The most common symptoms were jaundice (64.5%), asthenia (16%), and prolonged jaundice (3.5%), and in 16% of patients, hyperbilirubinemia was detected on routine pediatric examination. The trigger factors for hyperbilirubinemia were prolonged fasting (5.4%), infections (5.4%), and sleeplessness (1.8%). In 87.5 of patients, the trigger factors were unclear.
The mean serum total, direct bilirubin level, and indirect bilirubin level was 2.5 ± 1.1 mg/dL, 0.4 ± 0.1 mg/dL, and 2.0 ± 1.1 mg/dL, respectively. The aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels of all patients were in the normal range. In 64.3% of patients, the serological assays for hepatitis A, B, and C virus were assessed; all of these were negative. In patients evaluated by different physicians, etiological examinations for chronic liver diseases were evaluated in 42.9% of patients. Chronic liver disease was not detected in any patient. Ultrasonography of abdomen was performed in 71.4% of patients, and hepatosteatosis was detected in 7.1% of patients.
It was observed that 49 of the 56 patients (87.5%) included in the study could be screened for UGT1A1 mutations. In mutation screening of UGT1A1, A(TA)6TAA and A(TA)7TAA, allele promoter polymorphism was detected in 11 (22.5%) patients and 37 (75.5%) patients, respectively. One case (2%) with (TA)6/7 was detected in the UGT1A1 promoter region. This patient, who was 16 years old, had no complaints and hyperbilirubinemia. The control examinations revealed a total serum bilirubin of 2.3 mg/dL and an indirect bilirubin of 1.65 mg/dL. A comparison of 2 polymorphism groups ((TA)7/7 and (TA)6/6) with regard to the demographic, clinical characteristics, and laboratory findings is shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Comparison of Demographic, Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Findings of (TA)7/7 and (TA)6/6 Polymorphism Groups
| Total (n = 56) | A(TA)6TAA (n = 11) (22.5%) | A(TA)7TAA (n = 37) (75.5%) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Demography
Age (mean ± SD) (years) Sex (male), n (%) |
13.9 ± 4.041 (73.2) |
11.9 ± 4.410 (90.9) |
14.0 ± 4.025 (67.6) |
.036a .246b |
| Family history, n (%) | 2 (3.6) | - | 2 (5.4) | |
| Parental Consanguinity, n (%) | 12 (21.4) | 1 (9.1) | 9 (24.3) | |
|
Symptoms at presentation, n(%)
Jaundice Asthenia Incidental Prolonged jaundice |
36 (64.5) 9 (16) 9 (16) 2 (3.5) |
8 (72.7) 1 (9.1) 2 (18.2) - |
22 (59.5) 7 (18.9) 6 (16.2) 2 (5.4) |
.367 b |
| Laboratory profile (mean ± SD) Hemoglobin (g/dL) AST (IU/L) ALT (IU/L) Total bilirubin (mg/dL) Direct bilirubin (mg/dL) Indirect bilirubin (mg/dL) |
13.9 ± 1.524.2 ± 11.617.8 ± 13.52.5 ± 1.10.4 ± 0.12.0 ± 1.1 |
12.8 ± 1.529.7 ±2 0.116.5 ± 8.52.3 ± 0.90.4 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.9 |
13.8 ± 1.323.7 ± 9.219.4 ± 15.62.6 ± 1.30.4 ± 0.12.1 ± 1.2 |
.038c .350a .969a .376a 1.000a .434a |
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.
aMann–Whitney U test; bFisher’s exact test; cindependent samples t-test.
In 3 patients (0.05%), 2 different sequence variants [c.880_893delinsA (p.Tyr294MetfsTer69) and c.1091C>T(p.Pro365Leu)] were detected in the heterozygous state. Two of these patients exhibited (TA)6/6 promoter region polymorphism, whereas 1 patient exhibited (TA)6/7 promoter region polymorphism.
DISCUSSION
Seven TA repeats responsible for the development of GS were detected in the majority of the patients (75.5%) in our study. Mildly elevated bilirubin levels were detected in the cases with 6 repetitions, which was considered non-risky in terms of GS. In a study from Serbia, GS non-risk UGT1A1 (TA)n promoter genotypes TA 6/6 and TA 6/7 were detected in 3.9% of patients and 15.8% of patients, respectively.9 In our study, (TA) 6/7 heterozygous mutation was detected in the UGT1A1 promoter region of 1 patient (2%), and (TA)6/6 mutation was detected in 22.5%. The patient, who had (TA)6/7 mutation with mild hyperbilirubiemia, had no complaints. A study from Iran presented 2 rare mutations (TA6/8 and TA6/5) detected in 2 children with normal bilirubin levels.10 UGT1A1*6 was reported to cause GS in the homozygous state in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean populations.11,12 Homozygosity for the mildly pathogenic variant UGT1A1*6 (rs4148323, c.211G>A, and p.Gly71Arg) is also a common cause of GS in East Asians. The UGT1A1*28 variant was found to be higher in Malays and Indians with an allele frequency of 25% and 28%, respectively.13 In Caucasian and African populations, almost all GS individuals are homozygotes for UGT1A1*28.4,14
Another molecular genetic etiological cause of GS other than promoter region polymorphisms is sequence variants. In 3 patients, 2 different sequence variants [c.880_893delinsA (p.Tyr294MetfsTer69) and c.1091C>T(p.Pro365Leu)] were detected. The c.1091C>T(p.Pro365Leu) variant was detected in 2 of our patients in a heterozygous state. This variant was reported as “Likely Pathogenic” in the ClinVar database (rs34946978) and was previously associated with a significant reduction in UGT1A1 enzyme activity and GS phenotype.15 The c.880_893delinsA (p.Tyr294MetfsTer69) variant was detected in 1 patient in a heterozygous state. This variant was reported as “Pathogenic” in the ClinVar database (rs587776761). This variant was previously associated with Crigler–Najjar syndrome type 1; however, since Crigler–Najjar syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder and was detected in a heterozygous state, we suggested that the variant was causing partial enzyme deficiency leading to the GS phenotype.16 Because the patient’s clinical and laboratory findings were detected to be compatible with GS.
To determine the cause of idiopathic hyperbilirubinemia in newborns from Turkey, a study assessed the UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism. In this study, in the idiopathic hyperbilirubinemia group, higher peak bilirubin levels, higher heterozygous and variant homozygous genotypes, and higher (TA)7 allele frequencies were observed. Similar to our study, (TA)5 and (TA)8 polymorphisms were not detected.17 The frequency of (TA)7/7 genotype was detected as 5.8% in this study, but it has previously been reported as 0.6%, 8.5%, and 10% in other studies with neonates with jaundice from different regions of Turkey.17-20 Apart from these studies, no study evaluating the genetic findings of GS in Turkish older children has been reported. Regarding UGT1A1 mutations, case reports and case series with Crigler–Najjar syndrome are primarily reported from Turkey.21,22
A patient presenting with jaundice can be a cause of concern for physicians. When bilirubin elevation is detected, it may cause cases to be examined for liver disease and hematological diseases. Because of high indirect bilirubin levels, many unnecessary tests may be performed for the diagnosis. Additionally, children are referred to gastroenterology outpatient clinics for further examination. In patients with isolated indirect hyperbilirubinemia, GS should be considered in differential diagnosis. Determination of clinical and laboratory findings compatible with GS is considered sufficient for the diagnosis.1 As a result, diagnosis of GS can be made without the need for many unnecessary tests.23 The fact that these unnecessary tests were performed in some patients in our study has been a point where we criticize ourselves. It is seen that abdominal ultrasonography and etiological examinations for chronic liver diseases were applied to some of the patients unnecessarily. Hepatosteatosis has been detected in some of the GS patients who underwent abdominal ultrasonography in our study. There is no relationship between GS and hepatosteatosis. Therefore, further examination for hepatosteatosis has been planned in these patients. Genetic analysis could also be used to support the diagnosis in suspicious cases. The reason for the high number of genetic analysis of the patients in our study is that it was desired to show genetic data as well as suspicious cases.
Rare de novo variants have been reported in GS and are more common in boys than girls. Serum indirect bilirubin is usually <3 mg/dL in GS. Rarely, indirect bilirubin can be seen between 3 mg/dL and 6 mg/dL.1 In our study, the mean indirect bilirubin level was 2.0 ± 1.1 mg/dL. Gilbert syndrome is rarely clinically manifested before puberty. Males are more often diagnosed with GS than females, 2 to 7 times more frequently, because there is a larger bilirubin load per kilogram body weight in males, and androgen steroid hormone suppresses hepatic bilirubin clearance.24,25 In our study, 73.2% of the patients were male, and their mean age was 13.9 ± 4.0 years, which is consistent with the literature.
Fluctuating mild hyperbilirubinemia is seen, but cases are generally asymptomatic. In our study, in 16% of the patients, who had no complaints, hyperbilirubinemia was detected on routine pediatric examination. When jaundice or indirect bilirubin elevation is detected in tests, it can be concerning to families and children. Clinicians should explain to parents and children that GS is a benign condition and inform them about the triggering factors (such as hunger, sleeplessness, infection, and stress).26 In our patients, the main trigger factors for hyperbilirubinemia were prolonged fasting, infections, and sleeplessness. In particular, patients should be made aware of the potential for temporary attacks of jaundice, which does not harm the patient. It should be explained to the patient and family that GS does not require any treatment.
The present study has limitations common to retrospective studies. Prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to provide additional evidence on the clinical and genetic profiles of GS in Turkish children.
CONCLUSION
Gilbert syndrome should be considered in differential diagnosis based on history and clinical findings in patients who present with jaundice and have indirect hyperbilirubinemia, even if there is no consanguinity and family history. Clinicians should explain to patients that jaundice attacks in GS, which can be concerning for families, are not harmful and to recommend ways that patients can avoid triggers. There are many UGT1A1 mutations and variants; their frequency varies in each population, and clinical findings may differ according to the genetic characteristics of GS.
Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by Ethics committee of SBU Tepecik Training and Research Hospital (Approval No: 2020/13-13).
Footnotes
Informed Consent: Verbal and Written informed consent was obtained from the patients who agreed to take part in the study.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Author Contributions: Concept – Y.C.A.; Design – Y.C.A., B.A., M.B.; Supervision – Y.C.A., M.B.; Materials – Y.C.A., B.A., B.Ö., T.R.Ö.; Data collection and/or Processing – Y.C.A., B.A., B.Ö., T.R.Ö., M.B.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – Y.C.A., B.A., B.Ö., M.B., T.R.Ö.; Literature Search – Y.C.A., B.Ö., B.A., T.R.Ö; Writing Manuscript – Y.C.A., B.A., B.Ö., M.B.; Critical Review – Y.C.A, B.Ö., M.B.
Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Funding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
References
- 1. Wagner KH, Shiels RG, Lang CA, Seyed Khoei N, Bulmer AC. Diagnostic criteria and contributors to Gilbert’s syndrome. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55(2):129 139. 10.1080/10408363.2018.1428526) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Memon N, Weinberger BI, Hegyi T, Aleksunes LM. Inherited disorders of bilirubin clearance. Pediatr Res. 2016;79(3):378 386. 10.1038/pr.2015.247) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wisnumurti DA, Sribudiani Y, Porsch RM.et al. UGT1A1 genetic variations and haplotype associated with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Indonesian population. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:9425843. 10.1155/2018/9425843) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bosma PJ, Chowdhury JR, Bakker C.et al. The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in Gilbert’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(18):1171 1175. 10.1056/NEJM199511023331802) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Beutler E, Gelbart T, Demina A. Racial variability in the UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1A1) promoter: a balanced polymorphism for regulation of bilirubin metabolism? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(14):8170 8174. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8170) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. McDonagh AF, Palma LA, Schmid R. Reduction of biliverdin and placental transfer of bilirubin and biliverdin in the pregnant guinea pig. Biochem J. 1981;194(1):273 282. 10.1042/bj1940273) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. den Dunnen JT, Antonarakis SE. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum Mutat. 2000;15(1):7 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Marques SC, Ikediobi ON. The clinical application of UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic testing: gene-environment interactions. Hum Genomics. 2010;4(4):238 249. 10.1186/1479-7364-4-4-238) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Vukovic M, Radlovic N, Lekovic Z.et al. UGT1A1 (TA)n promoter genotype: diagnostic and population pharmacogenetic marker in Serbia. Balkan J Med Genet. 2018;21(1):59 68. 10.2478/bjmg-2018-0012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Heydari MR, Fardaei M, Kadivar MR.et al. Prevalence of 2 UGT1A1 gene variations related to Gilbert’s syndrome in south of Iran: an epidemiological, clinical, and genetic study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2017;19(4):e44363. 10.5812/ircmj.44363) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sato H, Adachi Y, Koiwai O. The genetic basis of Gilbert’s syndrome. Lancet. 1996;347(9001):557 558. 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91266-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Maruo Y, Nishizawa K, Sato H, Doida Y, Shimada M. Association of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase polymorphism. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1224 1227. 10.1542/peds.103.6.1224) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Teh LK, Hashim H, Zakaria ZA, Salleh MZ. Polymorphisms of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27 & UGT1A1*28 in three major ethnic groups from Malaysia. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136(2):249 259. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Monaghan G, Ryan M, Seddon R, Hume R, Burchell B. Genetic variation in bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene promoter and Gilbert’s syndrome. Lancet. 1996;347(9001):578 581. 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91273-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Yang H, Wang Q, Zheng L.et al. Clinical significance of UGT1A1 genetic analysis in Chinese neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Neonatol. 2016;57(4):310 317. 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.08.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ritter JK, Yeatman MT, Ferreira P, Owens IS. Identification of a genetic alteration in the code for bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase in the UGT1 gene complex of a Crigler-Najjar type I patient. J Clin Invest. 1992;90(1):150 155. 10.1172/JCI115829) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ergin H, Bican M, Atalay OE. A causal relationship between UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 promoter polymorphism and idiopathic hyperbilirubinemia in Turkish newborns. Turk J Pediatr. 2010;52(1):28 34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ulgenalp A, Duman N, Schaefer FV.et al. Analyses of polymorphism for UGT1*1 exon 1 promoter in neonates with pathologic and prolonged jaundice. Biol Neonate. 2003;83(4):258 262. 10.1159/000069487) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Babaoglu MO, Yigit S, Aynacioglu AS, Kerb R, Yurdakok M, Bozkurt A. Neonatal jaundice and bilirubin UDPglucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene polymorphism in Turkish patients. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98(4):377 380. 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_341.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Muslu N, Turhan AB, Eskandari G.et al. The frequency of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 promoter region (TA)7 polymorphism in newborns and its relation with jaundice. J Trop Pediatr. 2007;53(1):64 68. 10.1093/tropej/fml067) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Labrune P, Myara A, Hadchouel M.et al. Genetic heterogeneity of Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I: a study of 14 cases. Hum Genet. 1994;94(6):693 697. 10.1007/BF00206965) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yildiz D, Alan S, Kilic A.et al. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I in a Turkish newborn caused by a novel mutation and Gilbert type genetic defect. Genet Couns. 2013;24(3):273 277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Strassburg CP. Hyperbilirubinemia syndromes (Gilbert-Meulengracht, Crigler-Najjar, Dubin-Johnson, and Rotor syndrome). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24(5):555 571. 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.07.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Radu P, Atsmon J. Gilbert’s syndrome-clinical and pharmacological implications. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001;3(8):593 598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Radlović N, Leković Z, Mladenović M.et al. Gilbert’s syndrome in children – our experience. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2007;135(5-6):317 320. 10.2298/sarh0706317r) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Claridge LC, Armstrong MJ, Booth C, Gill PS. Gilbert’s syndrome. BMJ. 2011;342:d2293. 10.1136/bmj.d2293) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]