Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2022 Mar 26;101(6):1160–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.02.032

Effects of acid on bone

David A Bushinsky 1, Nancy S Krieger 1
PMCID: PMC9133222  NIHMSID: NIHMS1793172  PMID: 35351460

Abstract

The homeostatic regulation of a stable systemic pH is of critical importance for mammalian survival. During metabolic acidosis (a reduction in systemic pH caused by a primary decrease in serum bicarbonate concentration), as seen in clinical disorders such as the later stages of chronic kidney disease, renal tubular acidosis, or chronic diarrhea, bone buffers the accumulated acid; however, this homeostatic function of the skeleton occurs at the expense of the bone mineral content and leads to decreased bone quality. During acute metabolic acidosis, there is initial physiochemical bone mineral dissolution, releasing carbonate and phosphate proton buffers into the extracellular fluid. In addition, there is net proton influx into the mineral with release of bone sodium and potassium. During chronic metabolic acidosis, there is also inhibition of osteoblast activity, resulting in reduced bone formation, and an increase in osteoclast activity, resulting in increased bone resorption and release of calcium and anionic proton buffers. These physicochemical and cell-mediated bone responses to metabolic acidosis, in addition to an acidosis-induced increased urine calcium excretion, without a corresponding increase in intestinal calcium absorption, induce a net loss of body calcium that is almost certainly derived from the mineral stores of bone.

Keywords: bone, calcium, mineral metabolism


Metabolic acids are derived from the metabolism of dietary proteins, phospholipids, and nucleic acids and result in a daily addition of ≈0.7 to 1.0 mEq/kg per day to the systemic circulation.1,2 These acids are buffered, before their excretion, to prevent a decrease in extracellular pH.3 Both intracellular buffers, such as anionic proteins and phosphates, especially in muscle, and extracellular buffers, principally bicarbonate in addition to the phosphates and carbonates in bone, help to mitigate a decrease in extracellular pH. In patients with normal kidney function, these metabolic acids are soon quantitatively excreted through enhanced ammonia and titratable acid excretion. The level of serum bicarbonate, which is generally used clinically to measure systemic acid base status, is maintained within the normal range. However, with a decline in kidney function, the daily addition of metabolic acids begins to exceed the capacity of the kidney to quantitatively excrete these metabolic acids and they begin to accumulate. Initially, further acid (proton) buffering prevents a decrease in serum bicarbonate below the lower limit of the normal range (generally considered to be 22–29 mEq/L). Acid retention with the concentration of serum bicarbonate in the normal range is termed eubicarbonatemic (or normobicarbonatemic) metabolic acidosis.1,4 However, although within the normal range, the level of serum bicarbonate may be lower than the previous baseline for that individual. Urine excretion of citrate (an abundant organic base) and ammonia decreases with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD).57 This eubicarbonatemic metabolic acidosis contributes to progression of CKD.810 With further loss of kidney function, as the proton buffering capacity of the systemic buffers is overwhelmed, the serum concentration of bicarbonate decreases below the lower limit of the normal range and criteria for the clinical definition of metabolic acidosis (a reduction in systemic pH caused by a primary decrease in serum bicarbonate concentration) are satisfied.3 In this review, we will elaborate how metabolic acidosis affects the bone mineral, especially carbonates and phosphates, and osteoblastic (responsible for bone formation) and osteoclastic (responsible for bone resorption) function as the bone buffers the additional protons.

In vivo studies

There is substantial in vivo evidence that metabolic acidosis adversely affects bone.1116 Approximately 60% of the increase in protons is acutely buffered by bone12,13,1523 and soft tissues.16,2427 Animal models of acute metabolic acidosis demonstrate that sodium, potassium, carbonate, and calcium are lost from bone during acid exposure, suggesting the exchange of sodium and/or potassium for protons on the bone surface and consumption of bone mineral carbonate in buffering the excess protons.20,22,2841 In acidemic patients with CKD, bone carbonate is decreased,4244 which may represent dissolution of carbonate stores and/or replacement by phosphate as protons are incorporated into the mineral20,22,35 and the rate of fracture is increased.4548 In most in vivo studies, chronic metabolic acidosis is associated with a concomitant decrease in bone mineral content,49,50 which appears to reflect acid-mediated dissolution and/or resorption of bone mineral.12,17,41,49,5154 The net negative calcium balance is due to increased urine calcium excretion, without a corresponding increase in intestinal calcium absorption,53,55,56 resulting in a net loss of body calcium.16,50,57 Bone is almost certainly the source of this additional urinary calcium, as ~98% of body calcium is contained within the skeleton.58 The administration of oral base as either bicarbonate or citrate has been shown to correct acidosis-induced bone mineral loss.5963

The metabolism of dietary protein generates metabolic acids that may be increased by consumption of the common high endogenous acid-producing diet of North Americans, coupled to the age-related decline in kidney function and ability to excrete acid.14,64,65 This has led to the hypothesis that acid retention and its resorptive effect on bone play a role in causing osteoporosis.2,14,15,49,6668 This hypothesis is supported by the observation that administration of base decreases the negative calcium balance induced by a high protein diet.6971 Postmenopausal women were fed a constant diet, and their endogenous acid production was neutralized with potassium bicarbonate.70 In the test subjects, potassium bicarbonate reduced urinary calcium excretion, making the calcium balance less negative. Bicarbonate treatment reduced urinary excretion of hydroxyproline, a marker of bone breakdown, and increased excretion of serum osteocalcin, a marker of osteoblastic bone formation. These results have been confirmed in other studies in postmenopausal women and in elderly men and women.62,63,7274 In a randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind trial, 161 postmenopausal women with low bone mass received 30 mEq of either oral potassium citrate or potassium chloride as a control. The women who received potassium citrate had a significant intergroup increase in bone mineral density (±SE) of 1.87% ± 0.50% at L2 through L4 (P < 0.001), 1.39% ± 0.48% (P < 0.001) at femoral neck, and 1.98% ± 0.51% (P < 0.001) at total hip.62 In another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 60 mEq of potassium citrate given to 201 elderly healthy men and women for 24 months significantly increased areal bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (L2–L4) by 1.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.0%–2.3%) net of placebo and in the femoral neck by 1.6% (95% confidence interval, 1.1%–2.2%) net of placebo. In this study, potassium citrate significantly decreased the bone fracture prediction score by FRAX (fracture risk assessment tool that predicts the percentage probability of any fracture in 10 years) analysis in both men and women.63

Metabolic acidosis also alters new bone formation. The independent effect of acidosis to suppress bone formation in vivo has been demonstrated in children with distal renal tubular acidosis.75,76 Alkali therapy helped these children attain and maintain normal height. The administration of alkali to correct the acidosis improved bone histology and mineral density in adults with distal renal tubular acidosis.77,78 In a radiographic study, most patients with proximal renal tubular acidosis had rickets or osteopenia.79 In vitro studies support these in vivo observations and provide insight into the mechanisms by which bone buffers the excess protons during acid retention and will be reviewed below.

Acute metabolic acidosis

Calcium release.

In vitro organ culture and cell-based assays have been used extensively to study calcium release and proton buffering in response to models of acute metabolic acidosis. Neonatal mouse calvariae (frontal and parietal bones of the skull) contain functioning osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respond to hormones, and synthesize DNA and protein like human bone.23,80,81 The calvariae can be cultured in the physiological carbon dioxide–bicarbonate buffered medium, allowing the pH to be independently altered within the physiological range by changing the bicarbonate concentration (simulating metabolic acidosis or alkalosis) or the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (simulating respiratory acidosis or alkalosis). In this model, cultured calvariae exhibit proton-dependent net calcium efflux during both acute (≤3 hours) and chronic (≥24–99 hours) incubations in medium modeling metabolic acidosis (Figure 1).23,8284

Figure 1 |. Response of bone to metabolic acidosis.

Figure 1 |

Acidosis has both short-term (<24 hours; blue) and long-term (>24 hours; red) effects on bone. Short-term responses are primarily physicochemical exchanges of protons (H+) with sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) as well as Ca release; long-term responses are cell mediated and result, in addition, to the release of H+ buffers carbonates (CO32−) and phosphates (PO43–). Osteoblast activity is regulated, leading to decreased bone formation and increased signaling that activates osteoclastic bone resorption. Collagen, alkaline phosphatase (AP), osteopontin (OP), and matrix Gla protein (MGP) are decreased, whereas prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) are stimulated. Osteoclasts also respond directly to H+ in addition to the osteoblast-mediated activation through the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK), leading to an increase in β-glucuronidase (β-Glu).

In acute (3-hour) experiments in neonatal mouse calvariae, there was a consistent slope between the medium pH and the calcium flux, regardless of treatments that stimulated or suppressed bone cell activity without directly affecting the bone mineral.82 These findings demonstrated that acute acid-mediated calcium release from bone is primarily due to physicochemical, and not cell-mediated, mechanisms. Synthetic, carbonated apatite disks, a cell-free model of bone mineral,8587 immersed in a physiologically acid medium, demonstrated similar net calcium efflux to that observed in calvariae over a 3-hour period of incubation,88 supporting a physicochemical mechanism for the acute response of bone to protons.

To determine the type of bone mineral that would be affected by physicochemical forces, phosphate or carbonate concentrations were altered at either neutral or physiologically acid medium pH in calvarial cultures and the net calcium flux was measured.22 With respect to calcium and carbonate, but not calcium and phosphate, there was bone formation in a medium supersaturated with calcium carbonate, no change in the bone mineral when cultured in a saturated medium, and bone dissolution into an undersaturated medium. This indicated that bone carbonate appears to be selectively solubilized during an acute reduction in pH, leading to a release of calcium. Indeed, there was a progressive loss of total bone carbonate when calvariae were cultured in acidic medium.20 At a constant pH, whether physiologically neutral or acid, net calcium efflux from bone is dependent on the medium bicarbonate concentration; the lower the bicarbonate concentration, the greater the calcium efflux.89 Bone carbonate appears to be in the form of carbonated apatite.90,91

Hydrogen ion buffering.

Using in vitro neonatal mouse calvariae, incubation in culture medium acidified by a decrease in bicarbonate concentration resulted in a net influx of hydrogen ions into the bone, increasing the pH of the culture medium and indicating that hydrogen ions were buffered by bone.2123,27 In addition to calcium release from bone in response to metabolic acidosis, extensive in vitro evidence indicates acid buffering by bone is due to 2 key mechanisms: exchange of sodium and/or potassium for protons and consumption of carbonate and phosphate buffers released from the bone.2023,2729,33,34,83,89,9294

Bone is a reservoir for sodium and potassium, and its surface has fixed negative sites that normally complex with sodium, potassium, or hydrogen ions, with the sodium and potassium exchanging freely with the surrounding fluid.27 This surface distribution can be altered in the presence of additional hydrogen ions to lower the bicarbonate concentration and pH as a model of metabolic acidosis.27,83 A high-resolution scanning ion microprobe was used to determine that incubation in acidic medium caused a loss of surface sodium and potassium relative to calcium in conjunction with hydrogen ion buffering, suggesting that sodium and potassium exchanged with hydrogen ions on the bone surface, resulting in a decrease in medium acidity.28,29,33,34 This model is consistent with animal studies of acute acidosis using the stable isotope 41K to measure the 41K-to-calcium ratio, which demonstrated that acidosis induces a decrease in this ratio, suggesting a loss of the stable potassium isotope from the bone mineral as a consequence of acid exposure.34

Carbonate and phosphate buffers are released from bone in response to models of metabolic acidosis. Bone contains 80% of the total carbon dioxide content of the body, and acute acidosis decreases total bone carbon dioxide.35,95 Bone also contains ≈90% of total body phosphate, largely in the form of hydroxyapatite and derivative forms of apatite.45,96 During acidosis, protonation of the phosphate in apatite consumes protons and restores pH to the normal range.15,16,27,50 In addition, acidosis releases bone calcium and carbonate, leading to a progressive loss of bone carbonate over time.20,22 On the bone surface, there is a 4-fold depletion of carbonate in relation to phosphate, and, in cross-section, there is a 7-fold depletion of phosphate in relation to carbonate. These results indicate that acute hydrogen ion buffering by bone involves preferential dissolution of surface carbonate and of cross-sectional phosphate.92 Thus, during acute metabolic acidosis, sodium and potassium are exchanged for protons on the bone surface, and bone carbonate and phosphate are lost from the bone mineral, all to help neutralize the additional protons and help maintain a physiological normal pH.16,27

Relationship between calcium release and hydrogen ion buffering.

As described above, during acute metabolic acidosis, a reduction in pH causes both bone calcium release and proton buffering. With simple mineral dissolution, there should be a 1:1 ratio of protons buffered to calcium released in the case of calcium carbonate, 5:3 for apatite, and 1:1 for brushite.97 However, with cultured calvariae, the ratio was found to be 16 to 21:1, indicating that proton buffering could not simply be due to mineral dissolution.23 This indicates that calcium release is only one component of proton buffering by bone and is substantiated by the ion microprobe studies that show sodium and potassium exchange for protons28,29,33,34,93 and loss of bone phosphate and bicarbonate with acidosis.94,98

Chronic metabolic acidosis

Alteration in bone cell activity.

The chronic response (≥24 hours) to metabolic acidosis is dependent on specific bone cell responses; net calcium efflux from bone is mediated by inhibition of osteoblast activity, leading to decreased bone formation, and regulation of signaling, leading to increased osteoclast activity and enhanced bone resorption (Figure 2).27,83,99104 Increased resorption leads to release of proton buffers from bone, and decreased formation leads to less incorporation of proton buffers into the mineral. Conversely, an increase in medium bicarbonate concentration (modeling metabolic alkalosis) decreases calcium efflux from bone through increased osteoblastic bone formation and decreased osteoclastic bone resorption.21,105,106

Figure 2 |. Cellular response to metabolic acidosis.

Figure 2 |

Protons (H+) interact with a specific receptor, ovarian cancer G-protein coupled receptor 1 (OGR1), in both the osteoblast and the osteoclast. This receptor is coupled to phospholipase C (PLC), and its activation leads to inositol trisphosphate (IP3)–mediated release of intracellular calcium (Ca2+), which can alter specific gene transcription in the osteoblast. The transcription factor early growth response 1 (Egr1), matrix Gla protein (MGP), and osteopontin (OP) are decreased in response to metabolic acidosis, whereas cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) is increased, catalyzing increased prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production from arachidonic acid (AA). PGE2 then stimulates production of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) as well as fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) by paracrine activation of the EP4 prostaglandin receptor. RANKL is secreted and binds to its receptor, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK), on the osteoclast, leading to increased bone resorption. Release of the lysosomal enzyme, β-glucuronidase is indicative of osteoclast activation. The specific intracellular signaling initiated by OGR1 in the osteoclast is less well understood, but both pathways are necessary for the full response to metabolic acidosis.

Decreased osteoblast activity.

After 24 to 48 hours in culture, neonatal mouse calvariae incubated in medium with a physiological reduction in bicarbonate and pH, as a model of metabolic acidosis, demonstrate a marked decrease in osteoblast secretion of alkaline phosphatase, reduced synthesis of collagen, and reduced expression of noncollagenous proteins, such as osteopontin and osteocalcin, which in aggregate lead to reduced bone mineralization.27,99,107109 Bone responds to chronic metabolic acidosis by reducing the content and production of new osteoblasts and by generating osteoblastic signaling molecules that activate osteoclasts and bone resorption.27,103 Osteoblast collagen synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity were both decreased compared with controls in calvarial cultures.99,107 Egr-1,a key transcription factor involved in the maturation of fibroblasts, connective tissue, and bone cells,110 is inhibited by chronic metabolic acidosis.109 In contrast, expression of c-fos, c-jun, junB, and junD RNA in osteoblasts was not affected by a similar decrement in medium pH.107 In a model using primary cells isolated from neonatal mouse calvariae, consisting primarily of osteoblasts, incubations up to 23 days in duration in a physiologically acidic medium reduced collagen synthesis, formation of apatite nodules, and influx of calcium into the apatite nodules, compared with incubation in neutral medium.111 In addition, in incubations up to 44 days in duration, bone matrix protein gene expression (e.g., matrix Gla protein and osteopontin) was also reduced on exposure to physiologically acidic medium relative to expression in neutral medium.109 Similar inhibition of mineralization by acidosis in vitro has also been demonstrated in cultured rat calvarial osteoblasts112 and human osteoblasts.113 Studies of the effects of acidosis on bone in intact animals and humans are needed to confirm that these changes observed in vitro also occur in vivo.

The inhibition of osteoblast activity by metabolic acidosis is mediated by the proton-sensing receptor, ovarian cancer G-protein coupled receptor 1, OGR1 (also called GPR68).103,114 Ludwig et al. first reported that OGR1 is expressed in mouse osteoblasts, and a reduction in pH led to an accumulation of phosphoinositide metabolites.115 OGR1 has also been found in osteoclasts.116119 One of the first intracellular responses in the osteoblast to metabolic acidosis is an increase in inositol trisphosphate–mediated intracellular calcium that was inhibited by CuCl2, a known inhibitor of OGR1.114 Pharmacologic blockade of inositol trisphosphate–mediated intracellular calcium was shown to inhibit acid-induced bone resorption, suggesting that this initial signaling response is critical for the response of the osteoblast to metabolic acidosis and subsequent stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption.120 In rapidly growing mice that generate significant metabolic acids, global deletion of OGR1 in male mice was found to result in increased bone density and increased osteoblast gene expression with a greater increase in bone formation than bone resorption.103,104 In this report, female mice were not studied. These results indicate that OGR1 is important in the initial response of bone to metabolic acidosis.

In addition to inhibiting intracellular responses in the osteoblast that lead to an inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation, metabolic acidosis has been shown to increase levels of prostaglandins in a variety of model systems.27 Prostaglandins, particularly prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), are potent multifunctional regulators of bone formation and resorption.121123 PGE2 has been shown to promote new bone formation in some animal models and in a cell culture of isolated osteoblasts.121 In a neonatal mouse calvarial cell culture model, stimulation of PGE2 is an important intermediate step in the response of osteoblasts to proton-mediated synthesis and secretion of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL).27,83,124 PGE2 stimulates bone resorption in organ culture and mediates bone resorption of mouse calvariae in response to a variety of cytokines and growth factors.27,123 In addition, the inhibition of PGE2 production by indomethacin limits acid-induced bone calcium release and acid stimulation of RANKL in the osteoblast.100,123,125,126 Cortisol also inhibits acid-induced bone resorption through a decrease in osteoblastic PGE2 production.127 Metabolic acidosis stimulates the expression of several genes in osteoblasts, including cyclooxygenase 2, the rate-limiting step in prostaglandin production.100,128 Pharmacologic blockade of cyclooxygenase 2 synthesis by the specific inhibitor NS-398129 prevents the downstream increase in RANKL and acid-induced bone resorption.128 In addition, mice with a genetic deficiency in cyclooxygenase 2 demonstrate a reduced response to acid-induced bone resorption.128 These experimental results indicate that acid-induced, cell-mediated calcium efflux from bone is regulated downstream of OGR1, at least in part, by an increase in endogenous PGE2 production, which, in turn, activates RANKL expression in osteoblasts to stimulate osteoclastic bone resorption and promotes release of bone calcium and anionic buffers, the latter of which help to neutralize the retained acid.

Increased osteoclastic activity.

The release of osteoclastic β-glucuronidase, a lysosomal enzyme whose secretion correlates with osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, is increased during culture of neonatal mouse calvariae in acid medium compared with neutral medium.99,130 Osteoclast activation is critical for metabolic acidosis to induce bone resorption. The molecular mechanisms for this activation appear to require initial osteoblast signaling; however, recent findings suggest that there is also a direct effect of metabolic acidosis on the osteoclast.131

The important role for the osteoclastic proton receptor OGR1 in the induction of osteoclastic bone resorption has been examined with the use of osteoclast-specific OGR1 knockout (OC-cKO) female mice.131 Micro–computed tomography demonstrated increased density in tibiae and femurs but not vertebrae of these OC-cKO female mice, consistent with previous work using a global deletion of OGR1 in male mice.103 In experiments using the OC-cKO mice where there is normal content of OGR1 in osteoblasts, isolated, differentiated osteoclasts derived from the bone marrow of femurs from OC-cKO mice demonstrated a decreased number of osteoclasts, pit formation, and osteoclast-specific gene expression compared with wild-type osteoclasts.131 The global OGR1 knockout mice showed histologic evidence of increased osteoclast activity, although subsequent characterization of isolated osteoclasts from global knockout bone demonstrated decreased osteoclast gene expression comparable to that observed in OC-cKO osteoclasts. In response to metabolic acidosis, osteoclasts from OC-cKO mice had decreased nuclear translocation of NFATc1, a transcriptional regulator of differentiation, and no increase in osteoclast size or number, as observed in osteo-clasts from wild-type mice. Thus, loss of osteoclast OGR1 decreased both basal and metabolic acidosis-induced osteo-clast activity, indicating that a direct effect on osteoclast OGR1 is important in mediating metabolic acidosis-induced bone resorption in addition to the responses of OGR1 in the osteoblast. These results are generally consistent with a direct role for OGR1 in the osteoclast, which has also been suggested by several other groups,116119,132,133 although many of the critical experiments did not use a physiological model of metabolic acidosis; the pH was below the physio-logical range and/or buffers other than physiological bicar-bonate/carbon dioxide were used. In our study, only OC-cKO female mice, and not male mice, exhibited a significant bone phenotype.131 This gender difference is consistent with other studies that have shown a differential effect on bone mass based on sex in a large number of individual gene knockouts.134,135 Future studies will be needed to address this difference in bone phenotype between female and male mice.

Effects of metabolic acidosis on bone in patients with CKD

Osteoblast inhibition and osteoclast activation in metabolic acidosis are 2 bone responses that, together with selective gene activation, regulate calcium, carbonate, and phosphate release to neutralize the additional acid load (Figure 3). In vivo, there are potential hormonal responses that can impact the effects of metabolic acidosis on bone, especially in the presence of CKD, including autocrine and paracrine effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and PGE2.15,83,136138 The resorptive state of the bone is also likely to influence the magnitude of acid buffering by bone.139 The simultaneous presence of CKD, metabolic acidosis, and osteoporosis often reinforces the detrimental effects of these hormones, increasing bone loss.

Figure 3 |. Contribution of metabolic acidosis to chronic kidney disease (CKD)–mineral and bone disorder.

Figure 3 |

As kidney function declines, renal acid excretion becomes quantitatively less than endogenous acid production, leading to chronic metabolic acidosis. Metabolic acidosis is among the factors that lead to a reduction in levels of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) and an increase in levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). Metabolic acidosis also accelerates the progression of CKD. The osseous response to metabolic acidosis results in the release of calcium (Ca2+) and the proton (H+) buffers carbonates (CO32−) and phosphates (PO43−), which help restore the systemic pH toward normal. There is also exchange of H+ for sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+), which again help mitigate the severity of the acidosis. The loss of bone mineral leads to bone fragility, which will increase the rate of bone fracture.

The level of circulating PTH generally increases as kidney function declines, termed secondary hyperparathyroidism.140 Elevated PTH causes net calcium and phosphate release from bone via osteoblast-mediated activation of osteoclasts.141 Metabolic acidosis suppresses osteoblast-induced collagen synthesis, increases PTH secretion, and increases osteoclast activity, thus shifting the balance of bone formation and bone resorption toward increased bone turnover and net bone loss.36,99,136,142,143 Metabolic acidosis enhances the calcemic response of bone to PTH, possibly mediated by enhanced uptake of PTH by bone cells and by enhanced PTH-mediated cyclic adenosine monophosphate production.142,144 The additive effects of acidosis and PTH were demonstrated in vitro with the mouse calvariae model; acidosis and PTH independently stimulated calcium efflux from bone, inhibited osteoblastic collagen synthesis, and stimulated osteoclastic β-glucuronidase secretion.130 When calvariae were cultured in acidic medium with PTH, there was greater calcium efflux, less osteoblastic collagen synthesis, and more osteoclastic β-glucuronidase secretion than with either acid or PTH alone.130

The level of the phosphaturic hormone, FGF23, increases significantly with decreasing kidney function, leading to decreased renal tubule reabsorption of inorganic phosphate and decreased 1,25 (OH)2D3 production.145 The elevation of FGF23 is associated with an increased mortality.146,147 FGF23 is synthesized in osteoblasts and osteocytes148; however, the primary regulator of its synthesis is not clear.149 Metabolic acidosis also develops and increases in severity as CKD progresses, suggesting the hypothesis that acidosis could stimulate FGF23 production. Indeed, in neonatal mouse calvarial organ cultures, physiological metabolic acidosis increased FGF23 gene expression and secretion of FGF23.150 In primary calvarial osteoblasts, FGF23 gene expression was stimulated by acidosis within 6 hours, even in the absence of any additional phosphate that would have been released during acid-induced bone resorption.150 Pharmacologic blockade of intracellular Ca signaling or cyclooxygenase 2 synthesis blocked the acidosis-induced FGF23 gene expression in primary osteoblasts and blocked acidosis stimulation of bone resorption,151 suggesting that the initial signaling responses to metabolic acidosis that stimulate FGF23 are the same that lead to increased bone resorption. Thus, metabolic acidosis could contribute to the increased FGF23 observed in patients with CKD and metabolic acidosis.

The 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D is necessary for normal bone formation and resorption.152 Metabolic acidosis reduces vitamin D production in animals,55,57,83,153,154 and alkali correction of metabolic acidosis in patients with CKD increases serum 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D levels, despite experimentally maintained serum levels of ionized calcium concentration and no changes in serum levels of magnesium, phosphate, albumin, or 25-hydroxyvitamin D.155,156

It is difficult to isolate the independent effects of metabolic acidosis on the bone disease observed in CKD.39,157,158 However, a retrospective study using bone biopsies to correlate bone health with acid-base status in patients with CKD revealed that subjects with a normal bone biopsy had a serum bicarbonate level within the normal range, whereas those with overt bone disease had mild-to-moderate acidosis.159 The complex connection between bone health and acidosis is apparent in studies of chronic hemodialysis patients. In those patients with predialysis serum bicarbonate <20 mEq/L or >22 mEq/L, a higher incidence of bone fractures was observed.160 In a randomized bone biopsy study of 21 hemodialysis patients, correction of metabolic acidosis prevented progression of hyperparathyroidism in those with high turnover and stimulated turnover in those with low bone formation.61 In a prospective 3-month study with oral bicarbonate or placebo given to 40 patients with mild-to-moderate CKD, correction of metabolic acidosis attenuated the increase in blood urea nitrogen and in PTH (nonsignificantly) but led to increased edema in 2 patients and the use of more antihypertensive agents in 3 patients.161

The clinical studies in which patients with CKD and metabolic acidosis were treated with oral alkali to neutralize systemic acidosis, dietary measures to reduce acid intake, or an experimental intestinal acid binder, which results in an increase in serum bicarbonate, primarily addressed treatment-dependent changes in glomerular filtration.162164 There are few studies in which the effects of treating metabolic acidosis examined changes in bone. Treatment of acidosis (n = 19) compared with control (n = 11) improved bone histology but not bone density in transplant patients.165 A recent 24-month, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 149 patients given either 0.4 mEq/kg of ideal body weight of sodium bicarbonate per day or a placebo did not find a significant difference in bone mineral density.166 A pragmatic multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of 300 elderly acidic CKD patients did not find a difference in markers of bone mineral metabolism in the 187 patients with primary outcome data available after 1 year.167 Their planned substudy of bone mineral density was discontinued because of low recruitment rates. The patients treated with bicarbonate experienced more clinical adverse effects. Correction of metabolic acidosis in patients with CKD and vascular calcification increases the possibility that the vascular calcification will worsen as the systemic pH increases, because calcium phosphate complexes that form the calcification are less soluble in an alkaline milieu.168,169 Although this topic has not been extensively studied to date, there is no evidence in humans that treatment of metabolic acidosis worsens calcification,170 and one prospective, randomized, crossover pilot study in 20 acidemic patients with CKD found that treatment of metabolic acidosis with sodium bicarbonate significantly improved vascular endothelial function.171 Future appropriately powered, long-term studies are needed to address the potential effect of treatment of metabolic acidosis in patients with CKD on bone mass and quality and vascular calcification.

Metabolic acidosis leads to an increase in bone resorption and a decrease in bone formation. One can hypothesize that the resorptive state of the bone mineral will directly affect the magnitude of the bone buffering.139 Patients with adynamic bone disease, the most common form of renal osteodystrophy, have a marked decrease in the activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts.172 In patients with this disorder, although metabolic acidosis would be expected to stimulate osteoclastic resorption, it would not be expected to further decrease the already significantly suppressed osteoblastic bone formation, resulting in decreased proton buffering by bone. This would be expected to worsen the acidosis and serve to increase the adverse effects of acidosis on the kidney, muscle, and bone.1 Bisphosphonate treatment in these individuals would further decrease proton buffering by bone.139 Conversely, in high turnover renal osteodystrophy, there is an increase in the activity of both the osteoclasts and the osteoblasts. In this condition, there might be enhanced proton buffering during metabolic acidosis, mitigating the adverse effects of acidosis. Clinical studies of the magnitude of proton buffering by bone in patients with low and high turnover renal osteodystrophy are needed to explore this important topic.

Comparison of respiratory acidosis to metabolic acidosis

Bone responds far more robustly to an isohydric reduction in pH induced by a decrease in bicarbonate (metabolic acidosis) compared with an increase in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (respiratory acidosis).1923,93,101,102,111,173176 In neonatal mouse calvariae, the type of acidosis is critical to determining the magnitude of both the bone calcium release and hydrogen ion buffering. During acute incubations (<3 hours), a model of metabolic acidosis induces far more calcium release than an isohydric model of respiratory acidosis.21 When osteoblasts are cultured to form bone nodules, metabolic, but not, respiratory acidosis inhibits bone formation.111 During metabolic acidosis, there is hydrogen ion influx onto the bone surface, which does not occur during respiratory acidosis.21

As opposed to metabolic acidosis, cell-mediated net calcium efflux is not observed during chronic respiratory acidosis.101 Respiratory acidosis does not alter osteoblastic collagen synthesis, alkaline phosphatase activity, or osteoclastic β-glucuronidase release, or appreciably alter the surface ion concentration of bone.93,106 Respiratory acidosis does not increase PGE2 levels in neonatal mouse calvariae, which is critical for induction of osteoclastic bone resorption by receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB/RANKL.177 The fact that metabolic, but not respiratory, acidosis adversely affects bone suggests that a low bicarbonate in addition to a low pH is critical for overall bone dissolution and resorption.89

Conclusion

Metabolic acidosis induces changes in the bone mineral that are consistent with the role of bone mineral as a proton buffer. The decrease in mineral sodium, potassium, carbonate, and phosphate will each lead to protons being buffered and to an increase in systemic pH back toward the physiological normal. These changes in mineral composition come about first through physicochemical mineral dissolution and later through alterations in bone cell function. Through the proton receptor OGR1, acidosis suppresses osteoblastic collagen synthesis and stimulates prostaglandin production, which, acting in a paracrine manner, increases osteoblastic RANKL synthesis. RANKL then stimulates osteoclastic activity and recruitment of new osteoclasts to further promote bone resorption and buffering of the proton load. There is, in addition, a direct effect of acidosis on osteoclasts to induce bone resorption. This protective function of bone to maintain systemic pH, which has a clear survival advantage for mammals, comes at the expense of its mineral stores.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Jerry Buysse, PhD, for editorial assistance and Jun Shao, PhD, for assistance in design of the figures. The schematic art pieces used in Figures 1 through 3 were generously made available by Servier Medical Art. This work was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health grant AR-46289 and by successive grants from the Renal Research Institute.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE

DAB reports grants from the Renal Research Institute and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). He reports stock and stock options in and is a consultant for Tricida; stock in Amgen; is a consultant for Relypsa/Vifor/Fresenius, Sanifit, and Amgen; is an adjudicator for adverse events from Novo Nordisk/Covance; and is a reviewer for propensity for kidney stone formation for Applied Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. NSK reports grants from Renal Research Institute and NIH and stock in Amgen. Her spouse has stock, stock options, and is a consultant for Tricida; her spouse consults for Relypsa/Vifor/Fresenius, Sanifit, and Amgen; her spouse is an adjudicator for adverse events from Novo Nordisk/Covance and a reviewer for propensity for kidney stone formation for Applied Therapeutics, outside the submitted work.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wesson DE, Buysse JM, Bushinsky DA. Mechanisms of metabolic acidosis-induced kidney injury in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;31:469–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lennon EJ, Lemann J Jr, Litzow JR. The effects of diet and stool composition on the net external acid balance of normal subjects. J Clin Invest 1966;45:1601–1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alpern RJ, Sakhaee K. The clinical spectrum of chronic metabolic acidosis: homeostatic mechanisms produced significant morbidity. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;29:291–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raphael KL. Metabolic acidosis and subclinical metabolic acidosis in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018;29:376–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goraya N, Simoni J, Sager LN, et al. Urine citrate excretion as a marker of acid retention in patients with chronic kidney disease without overt metabolic acidosis. Kidney Int 2019;95:1190–1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Raphael KL, Carroll DJ, Murray J, et al. Urine ammonium predicts clinical outcomes in hypertensive kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28: 2483–2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goraya N, Simoni J, Sager LN, et al. Urine citrate excretion identifies changes in acid retention as eGFR declines in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2019;317:F502–F511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wesson DE, Simoni J, Broglio K, et al. Acid retention accompanies reduced GFR in humans and increases plasma levels of endothelin and aldosterone. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011;300:F830–F837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wesson DE, Jo CH, Simoni J. Angiotensin II-mediated GFR decline in subtotal nephrectomy is due to acid retention associated with reduced GFR. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015;30:762–770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wesson DE, Simoni J. Acid retention during kidney failure induces endothelin and aldosterone production which lead to progressive GFR decline, a situation ameliorated by alkali diet. Kidney Int 2010;78:1128–1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goodman AD, Lemann J Jr, Lennon EJ, et al. Production, excretion, and net balance of fixed acid in patients with renal acidosis. J Clin Invest 1965;44:495–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bushinsky DA. The contribution of acidosis to renal osteodystrophy Kidney Int 1995;47:1816–1832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bushinsky DA. Internal exchanges of hydrogen ions: bone. In: Seldin DW, Giebisch G, eds. The Regulation of Acid-Base Balance Raven Press; 1989:69–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frassetto L, Banerjee T, Powe N, et al. Acid balance, dietary acid load, and bone effects-a controversial subject. Nutrients 2018;10:517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bushinsky DA. Acid-base imbalance and the skeleton. Eur J Nutr 2001;40:238–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lemann J Jr, Bushinsky DA, Hamm LL. Bone buffering of acid and base in humans. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003;285:F811–F832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bushinsky DA, Krieger NS. Regulation of bone formation and dissolution. In: Coe F, Favus M, Pak C, et al. , eds. Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management Raven Press; 1996:239–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bushinsky DA. Acidosis and bone. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1994;20: 40–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bushinsky DA, Ori Y. Effects of metabolic and respiratory acidosis on bone. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1993;2:588–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bushinsky DA, Lam BC, Nespeca R, et al. Decreased bone carbonate content in response to metabolic, but not respiratory, acidosis. Am J Physiol 1993;265:F530–F536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bushinsky DA. Net proton influx into bone during metabolic, but not respiratory, acidosis. Am J Physiol 1988;254:F306–F310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bushinsky DA, Lechleider RJ. Mechanism of proton-induced bone calcium release: calcium carbonate-dissolution. Am J Physiol 1987;253: F998–F1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bushinsky DA, Krieger NS, Geisser DI, et al. Effects of pH on bone calcium and proton fluxes in vitro. Am J Physiol 1983;245:F204–F209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levitt MF, Turner LB, Sweet AY, et al. The response of bone, connective tissue, and muscle to acute acidosis. J Clin Invest 1956;35:98–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adler S, Roy A, Relman AS. Intracellular acid-base regulation, I: the response of muscle cells to changes in CO2 tension or extra-cellular bicarbonate concentration. J Clin Invest 1965;44:8–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Poole-Wilson PA. Cameron IR. Intracellular pH and K+ of cardiac and skeletal muscle in acidosis and alkalosis. Am J Physiol 1975;229:1305–1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krieger NS, Frick KK, Bushinsky DA. Mechanism of acid-induced bone resorption. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2004;13:423–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bushinsky DA, Levi-Setti R, Coe FL. Ion microprobe determination of bone surface elements: effects of reduced medium pH. Am J Physiol 1986;250:F1090–F1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bushinsky DA, Wolbach W, Sessler NE, et al. Physicochemical effects of acidosis on bone calcium flux and surface ion composition. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:93–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bergstrom WH, Ruva FD. Changes in bone sodium during acute acidosis in the rat. Am J Physiol 1960;198:1126–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bettice JA, Gamble JL Jr. Skeletal buffering of acute metabolic acidosis. Am J Physiol 1975;229:1618–1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Burnell JM. Changes in bone sodium and carbonate in metabolic acidosis and alkalosis in the dog. J Clin Invest 1971;50:327–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bushinsky DA, Gavrilov K, Stathopoulos VM, et al. Effects of osteoclastic resorption on bone surface ion composition. Am J Physiol 1996;271: C1025–C1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bushinsky DA, Gavrilov K, Chabala JM, et al. Effect of metabolic acidosis on the potassium content of bone. J Bone Min Res 1997;12:1664–1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bettice JA. Skeletal carbon dioxide stores during metabolic acidosis. Am J Physiol 1984;247:F326–F330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kraut JA, Mishler DR, Singer FR, et al. The effects of metabolic acidosis on bone formation and bone resorption in the rat. Kidney Int 1986;30: 694–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Barzel US, Jowsey J. The effects of chronic acid and alkali administration on bone turnover in adult rats. Clin Sci 1969;36:517–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barzel US. The effect of excessive acid feeding on bone. Calcif Tissue Res 1969;4:94–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kraut JA, Madias NE. Adverse effects of the metabolic acidosis of chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2017;24:289–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mac Way F, Lessard M, Lafage-Proust MH. Pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder. Joint Bone Spine 2012;79: 544–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gasser JA, Hulter HN, Imboden P, et al. Effect of chronic metabolic acidosis on bone density and bone architecture in vivo in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2014;306:F517–F524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pellegrino ED, Blitz RM, Letteri JM. Inter-relationships of carbonate, phosphate, monohydrogen phosphate, calcium, magnesium, and sodium in uraemic bone: comparison of dialyzed and non-dialyzed patients. Clin Sci Mol Med 1977;53:307–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kaye M, Frueth AJ, Silverman M. A study of vertebral bone powder from patients with chronic renal failure. J Clin Invest 1970;49:442–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pellegrino ED, Blitz RM. The composition of human bone in uremia. Medicine 1965;44:397–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wesson DE. Metabolic acidosis effects on bone and its metabolism. In: Wesson DE, ed. Metqabolic Acidosis: A Guide to Clinical Assessment and Management Springer Science + Business Media; 2016:111–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gordon PL, Frassetto LA. Management of osteoporosis in CKD stages 3 to 5. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;55:941–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vilaca T, Salam S, Schini M, et al. Risks of hip and nonvertebral fractures in patients with CKD G3a-G5D: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2020;76:521–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Malluche HH, Porter DS, Monier-Faugere MC, et al. Differences in bone quality in low- and high-turnover renal osteodystrophy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;23:525–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barzel US. The skeleton as an ion exchange system: implications for the role of acid-base imbalance in the genesis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1431–1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lemann J Jr, Litzow JR, Lennon EJ. The effects of chronic acid loads in normal man: further evidence for the participation of bone mineral in the defense against chronic metabolic acidosis. J Clin Invest 1966;45: 1608–1614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bushinsky DA. Metabolic acidosis. In: Jacobson HR, Striker GE, Klahr S, eds. The Principles and Practice of Nephrology Mosby; 1995:924–932. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Green J, Kleeman CR. Role of bone in regulation of systemic acid-base balance. Kidney Int 1991;39:9–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coe FL, Bushinsky DA. Pathophysiology of hypercalciuria. Am J Physiol 1984;247:F1–F13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peterson AK, Moody M, Nakashima I, et al. Effects of acidosis on the structure, composition, and function of adult murine femurs. Acta Biomater 2021;121:484–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bushinsky DA, Riera GS, Favus MJ, et al. Response of serum 1,25(OH)2D3 to variation of ionized calcium during chronic acidosis. Am J Physiol 1985;249:F361–F365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lemann J Jr, Adams ND, Gray RW. Urinary calcium excretion in human beings. N Engl J Med 1979;301:535–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bushinsky DA, Favus MJ, Schneider AB, et al. Effects of metabolic acidosis on PTH and 1,25(OH)2D3 response to low calcium diet. Am J Physiol 1982;243:F570–F575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Widdowson EM, McCance RA, Spray CM. The chemical composition of the human body. Clin Sci 1951;10:113–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bishop MC, Ledingham JG. Alkali treatment of renal osteodystrophy. Br Med J 1972;4:529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cochran M, Wilkinson R. Effect of correction of metabolic acidosis on bone mineralization rates in patients with renal osteomalacia. Nephron 1975;15:98–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lefebvre A, de Vernejoul MC, Gueris J, et al. Optimal correction of acidosis changes progression of dialysis osteodystrophy. Kidney Int 1989;36:1112–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jehle S, Zanetti A, Muser J, et al. Partial neutralization of the acidogenic Western diet with potassium citrate increases bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17: 3213–3222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jehle S, Hulter HN, Krapf R. Effect of potassium citrate on bone density, microarchitecture, and fracture risk in healthy older adults without osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:207–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Frassetto L, Sebastian A. Age and systemic acid-base equilibrium: analysis of published data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1996;51:B91–B99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Frassetto LA, Morris RC Jr, Sebastian A. Effect of age on blood acid-base composition in adult humans: role of age-related renal functional decline. Am J Physiol 1996;271:F1114–F1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wachman A, Bernstein DS. Diet and osteoporosis. Lancet 1968;1: 958–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Carnauba RA, Baptistella AB, Paschoal V, et al. Diet-induced low-grade metabolic acidosis and clinical outcomes: a review. Nutrients 2017;9:538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dawson-Hughes B. Acid-base balance of the diet-implications for bone and muscle. Eur J Clin Nutr 2020;74:7–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lemann J Jr, Gray RW, Pleuss JA. Potassium bicarbonate, but not sodium bicarbonate, reduces urinary calcium excretion and improves calcium balance in healthy men. Kidney Int 1989;35:688–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sebastian A, Harris ST, Ottaway JH, et al. Improved mineral balance and skeletal metabolism in postmenopausal women treated with potassium bicarbonate. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1776–1781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sakhaee K, Nicar M, Hill K, et al. Contrasting effects of potassium citrate and sodium citrate therapies on urinary chemistries and crystallization of stone-forming salts. Kidney Int 1983;24:348–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Frassetto L, Morris RC Jr, Sebastian A. Long-term persistence of the urine calcium-lowering effect of potassium bicarbonate in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:831–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Palermo NJ, et al. Treatment with potassium bicarbonate lowers calcium excretion and bone resorption in older men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:96–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kraut JA, Coburn JW. Bone, acid, and osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1821–1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.McSherry E, Morris RC. Attainment and maintenance of normal stature with alkali therapy in infants and children with classic renal tubular acidosis. J Clin Invest 1978;61:509–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Acidosis McSherry E. and growth in nonuremic renal disease. Kidney Int 1978;14:349–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Domrongkitchaiporn S, Pongskul C, Sirikulchayanonta V, et al. Bone histology and bone mineral density after correction of acidosis in distal renal tubular acidosis. Kidney Int 2002;62:2160–2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Domrongkitchaiporn S, Pongsakul C, Stitchantrakul W, et al. Bone mineral density and histology in distal renal tubular acidosis. Kidney Int 2001;59:1086–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Brenner RJ, Spring DB, Sebastian A, et al. Incidence of radiographically evident bone disease, nephrocalcinosis, and nephrolithiasis in various types of renal tubular acidosis. N Engl J Med 1982;307:217–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Feldman RS, Krieger NS, Tashjian JAH. Effects of parathyroid hormone and calcitonin on osteoclast formation in vitro. Endocrinology 1980;107: 1137–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Schelling SH, Wolfe HJ, Tashjian JAH. Role of the osteoclast in prostaglandin E2 -stimulated bone resorption: a correlative morphometric and biochemical analysis. Lab Invest 1980;42:290–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bushinsky DA, Goldring JM, Coe FL. Cellular contribution to pH-mediated calcium flux in neonatal mouse calvariae. Am J Physiol 1985;248:F785–F789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bushinsky DA. Acidosis and renal bone disease. In: Olgaard K, Salusky IB, Silver J, eds. The Spectrum of Mineral and Bone Disorders in Chronic Kidney Disease Vol 2. Oxford University Press; 2010:253–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Krieger NS, Bushinsky DA. Renal diseases in bone: emerging therapeutics. In: Bronner F, Farach-Carson M, Roach H, eds. Bone - Metabolic Functions and Modulators Springer; 2012:163–177. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ellies LG, Nelson DGA, Featherstone JDB. Crystallographic structure and surface morphology of sintered carbonated apatites. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22:541–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ellies LG, Carter JM, Natiella JR, et al. Quantitative analysis of early in vivo tissue response to synthetic apatite implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22:137–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Nelson DGA, Featherstone JDB. Preparation, analysis and characterization of carbonated apatites. Calcif Tiss Int 1982;34:S69–S81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bushinsky DA, Sessler NE, Glena RE, et al. Proton-induced physicochemical calcium release from ceramic apatite disks. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:213–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bushinsky DA, Sessler NE. Critical role of bicarbonate in calcium release from bone. Am J Physiol 1992;263:F510–F515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Boskey AL, Posner AS. Conversion of amorphous calcium phosphate to microcrystalline hydroxyapatite-pH-dependent, solution mediated, solid-solid conversion. J Phys Chem 1973;77:2313–2317. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Grynpas MD, Bonar LC, Glimcher MJ. Failure to detect an amorphous calcium-phosphate solid phase in bone mineral: a radial distribution function study. Calcif Tissue Int 1984;36:291–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bushinsky DA, Smith SB, Gavrilov KL, et al. Acute acidosis-induced alteration in bone bicarbonate and phosphate. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2002;283:F1091–F1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chabala JM, Levi-Setti R, Bushinsky DA. Alteration in surface ion composition of cultured bone during metabolic, but not respiratory, acidosis. Am J Physiol 1991;261:F76–F84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bushinsky DA, Chabala JM, Gavrilov KL, et al. Effects of in vivo metabolic acidosis on midcortical bone ion composition. Am J Physiol 1999;277: F813–F819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Neuman WF, Neuman MW. The Chemical Dynamics of Bone Mineral University Chicago Press; 1958. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Chemical Feng X. and biochemical basis of cell-bone matrix interaction in health and disease. Curr Chem Biol 2009;3:189–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Glimcher MJ. Composition, structure and organization of bone and other mineralized tissues, and the mechanism of calcification. In: Greep RO, Astwood EB, Aurbach GD, eds. Handbook of Physiology, Endocrinology American Physiological Society; 1976:25–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bushinsky DA, Smith SB, Gavrilov KL, et al. Chronic acidosis-induced alteration in bone bicarbonate and phosphate. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003;285:F532–F539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Krieger NS, Sessler NE, Bushinsky DA. Acidosis inhibits osteoblastic and stimulates osteoclastic activity in vitro. Am J Physiol 1992;262:F442–F448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Frick KK, Bushinsky DA. Metabolic acidosis stimulates RANK ligand RNA expression in bone through a cyclooxygenase dependent mechanism. J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:1317–1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Bushinsky DA. Net calcium efflux from live bone during chronic metabolic, but not respiratory, acidosis. Am J Physiol 1989;256:F836–F842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Meghji S, Morrison MS, Henderson B, et al. pH dependence of bone resorption: mouse calvarial osteoclasts are activated by acidosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001;280:E112–E119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Krieger NS, Yao Z, Kyker-Snowman K, et al. Increased bone density in mice lacking the proton receptor OGR1. Kidney Int 2016;89:565–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Jorgetti V, Drüeke TB, Ott SM. Role of proton receptor OGR1 in bone response to metabolic acidosis? Kidney Int 2016;89:529–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bushinsky DA. Metabolic alkalosis decreases bone calcium efflux by suppressing osteoclasts and stimulating osteoblasts. Am J Physiol 1996;271:F216–F222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bushinsky DA. Stimulated osteoclastic and suppressed osteoblastic activity in metabolic but not respiratory acidosis. Am J Physiol 1995;268: C80–C88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Frick KK, Jiang L, Bushinsky DA. Acute metabolic acidosis inhibits the induction of osteoblastic egr-1 and type 1 collagen. Am J Physiol 1997;272:C1450–C1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kato K, Morita I. Promotion of osteoclast differentiation and activation in spite of impeded osteoblast-lineage differentiation under acidosis: effects of acidosis on bone metabolism. Biosci Trends 2013;7:33–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Frick KK, Bushinsky DA. Chronic metabolic acidosis reversibly inhibits extracellular matrix gene expression in mouse osteoblasts. Am J Physiol 1998;275:F840–F847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Havis E, Duprez D. EGR1 transcription factor is a multifaceted regulator of matrix production in tendons and other connective tissues. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:1664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Sprague SM, Krieger NS, Bushinsky DA. Greater inhibition of in vitro bone mineralization with metabolic than respiratory acidosis. Kidney Int 1994;46:1199–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Brandao-Burch A, Utting JC, Orriss IR, et al. Acidosis inhibits bone formation by osteoblasts in vitro by preventing mineralization. Calcif Tissue Int 2005;77:167–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Takeuchi S, Hirukawa K, Togari A. Acidosis inhibits mineralization in human osteoblasts. Calcif Tissue Int 2013;93:233–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Frick KK, Krieger NS, Nehrke K, et al. Metabolic acidosis increases intracellular calcium in bone cells through activation of the proton receptor OGR1. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:305–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ludwig MG, Vanek M, Gueirine D, et al. Proton-sensing G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 2003;425:93–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Komarova SV, Pereverzev A, Shum JW, et al. Convergent signaling by acidosis and receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL) on the calcium/calcineurin/NFAT pathway in osteoclasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:2643–2648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Yang M, Mailhot G, Birnbaum MJ, et al. Expression of and role for ovarian cancer G-protein-coupled receptor 1 (OGR1) during osteoclastogenesis. J Biol Chem 2006;281:23598–23605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Iwai K, Koike M, Ohshima S, et al. RGS18 acts as a negative regulator of osteoclastogenesis by modulating the acid-sensing OGR1/NFAT signaling pathway. J Bone Mineral Res 2007;22:1612–1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Li H, Wang D, Singh LS, et al. Abnormalities in osteoclastogenesis and decreased tumorigenesis in mice deficient for ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor 1. PLoS One 2009;4:e5705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Krieger NS, Bushinsky DA. Pharmacologic inhibition of intracellular calcium release blocks acid-induced bone resorption. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011;300:F91–F97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Blackwell KA, Raisz LG, Pilbeam CC. Prostaglandins in bone: bad cop, good cop? Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010;21:294–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kawaguchi H, Pilbeam CC, Harrison JR, et al. The role of prostaglandins in the regulation of bone metabolism. Clin Orth Rel Res 1995;313:36–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Krieger NS, Parker WR, Alexander KM, et al. Prostaglandins regulate acid-induced cell-mediated bone resorption. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2000;279:F1077–F1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Frick KK, LaPlante K, Bushinsky DA. RANK ligand and TNF-a mediate acid-induced bone calcium efflux in vitro. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2005;289:F1005–F1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Goldhaber P, Rabadjija L. H+ stimulation of cell-mediated bone resorption in tissue culture. Am J Physiol 1987;253:E90–E98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Rabadjija L, Brown EM, Swartz SL, et al. H+-stimulated release of prostaglandin E2 and cyclic adenosine 3’, 5’-monophosphoric acid and their relationship to bone resorption in neonatal mouse calvaria cultures. Bone Mineral 1990;11:295–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Krieger NS, Frick KK, Bushinsky DA. Cortisol inhibits acid-induced bone resorption in vitro. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:2534–2539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Krieger NS, Frick KK, LaPlante Strutz K, et al. Regulation of COX-2 mediates acid-induced bone calcium efflux in vitro. J Bone Mineral Res 2007;22:907–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.O’Neill GP, Kennedy BP, Mancini JA, et al. Selective inhibitors of COX-2. Agents Actions Suppl 1995;46:159–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Bushinsky DA, Nilsson EL. Additive effects of acidosis and parathyroid hormone on mouse osteoblastic and osteoclastic function. Am J Physiol 1995;269:C1364–C1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Krieger NS, Chen L, Becker J, et al. Deletion of the proton receptor OGR1 in mouse osteoclasts impairs metabolic acidosis-induced bone resorption. Kidney Int 2021;99:609–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Imenez Silva PH, Katamesh-Benabbas C, Chan K, et al. The proton-activated ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor 1 (OGR1) is responsible for renal calcium loss during acidosis. Kidney Int 2020;97: 920–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Pereverzev A, Komarova SV, Korcok J, et al. Extracellular acidification enhances osteoclast survival through an NFAT-independent, protein kinase C-dependent pathway. Bone 2008;42:150–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Rowe DW, Adams DJ, Hong S-H, et al. Screening gene knockout mice for variation in bone mass: analysis by mCT and histomorphometry. Curr Osteoporosis Rep 2018;16:77–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Ryan JW, Starczak Y, Tsangari H, et al. Sex-related differences in the skeletal phenotype of aged vitamin D receptor global knockout mice. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2016;164:361–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Copur S, Sag AA, Afsar B, et al. Complications of metabolic acidosis and alkalinizing therapy in chronic kidney disease patients: a clinician-directed organ-specific primer. Int Urol Nephrol 2020;52:2311–2320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Melamed ML, Buttar RS, Coco M. CKD-mineral bone disorder in stage 4 and 5 CKD: what we know today? Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2016;23:262–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Muntner P, Jones TM, Hyre AD, et al. Association of serum intact parathyroid hormone with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:186–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ott SM, Malluche HH, Jorgetti V, et al. Importance of bone turnover for therapeutic decisions in patients with CKD-MBD. Kidney Int 2021;100: 502–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Levin A, Bakris GL, Molitch M, et al. Prevalence of abnormal serum vitamin D, PTH, calcium, and phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease: results of the study to evaluate early kidney disease. Kidney Int 2006;71:31–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Goltzman D. Physiology of parathyroid hormone. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2018;47:743–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Beck N, Webster SK. Effects of acute metabolic acidosis on parathyroid hormone action and calcium mobilization. Am J Physiol 1976;230:127–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Coe FL, Firpoe JJ Jr, Hollandsworth DL, et al. Effect of acute and chronic metabolic acidosis on serum immunoreactive parathyroid hormone in man. Kidney Int 1975;8:262–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Martin KJ, Freitag JJ, Bellorin-Font E, et al. The effect of acute acidosis on the uptake of parathyroid hormone and the production of adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate by isolated perfused bone. Endocrinology 1980;106:1607–1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Musgrove J, Wolf M. Regulation and effects of FGF23 in chronic kidney disease. Annu Rev Physiol 2020;82:365–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Isakova T, Xie H, Yang W, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and risks of mortality and end-stage renal disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. JAMA 2011;305:2432–2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Vogt I, Haffner D, Leifheit-Nestler M. FGF23 and phosphate-cardiovascular toxins in CKD. Toxins (Basel) 2019;11:647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Courbebaisse M, Lanske B. Biology of fibroblast growth factor 23: from physiology to pathology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2018;8: a031260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Lanske B, Razzaque MS. Molecular interactions of FGF23 and PTH in phosphate regulation. Kidney Int 2014;86:1072–1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Krieger NS, Culbertson CD, Kyker-Snowman K, et al. Metabolic acidosis increases fibroblast growth factor 23 in neonatal mouse bone. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2012;303:F431–F436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Krieger NS, Bushinsky DA. Stimulation of fibroblast growth factor 23 by metabolic acidosis requires osteoblastic intracellular calcium signaling and prostaglandin synthesis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2017;313:F882–F886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Pike JW, Christakos S. Biology and mechanisms of action of the vitamin D hormone. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2017;46:815–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Ro HK, Tembe V, Krug T, et al. Acidosis inhibits 1,25(OH)2D3 but not cAMP production in response to parathyroid hormone in the rat. J Bone Min Res 1990;5:273–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Chan YL, Savdie E, Mason RS, et al. The effect of metabolic acidosis on vitamin D metabolites and bone histology in uremic rats. Calcif Tissue Int 1985;37:158–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kraut JA, Gordon EM, Ransom JC, et al. Effect of chronic metabolic acidosis in vitamin D metabolism in humans. Kidney Int 1983;24:644–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lu KC, Lin SH, Yu FC, et al. Influence of metabolic acidosis on serum 1, 25(OH)2D3 levels in chronic renal failure. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1995;21:398–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Kraut JA. The role of metabolic acidosis in the pathogenesis of renal osteodystrophy. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1995;2:40–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Jørgensen HS, David K, Salam S, et al. Traditional and non-traditional risk factors for osteoporosis in CKD. Calcif Tissue Int 2021;108:496–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Coen G, Mazzaferro S, Ballanti P, et al. Renal bone disease in 76 patients with varying degrees of predialysis chronic renal failure: a cross-sectional study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:813–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Kato A, Kido R, Onishi Y, et al. Association of serum bicarbonate with bone fractures in hemodialysis patients: the mineral and bone disorder outcomes study for Japanese CKD stage 5D patients (MBD-5D). Nephron Clin Pract 2014;128:79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Mathur RP, Dash SC, Gupta N, et al. Effects of correction of metabolic acidosis on blood urea and bone metabolism in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease: a prospective randomized single blind controlled trial. Ren Fail 2006;28:1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Navaneethan SD, Shao J, Buysse J, et al. Effects of treatment of metabolic acidosis in CKD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019;14:1011–1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Wesson DE, Mathur V, Tangri N, et al. Veverimer versus placebo in patients with metabolic acidosis associated with chronic kidney disease: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019;393:1417–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Wesson DE, Mathur V, Tangri N, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of veverimer in patients with metabolic acidosis in chronic kidney disease: a multicentre, randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled, 40-week extension. Lancet 2019;394:396–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Starke A, Corsenca A, Kohler T, et al. Correction of metabolic acidosis with potassium citrate in renal transplant patients and its effect on bone quality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;7:1461–1472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Melamed ML, Horwitz EJ, Dobre MA, et al. Effects of sodium bicarbonate in CKD stages 3 and 4: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2020;75:225–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.BiCARB Study Group. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of oral sodium bicarbonate therapy for older patients with chronic kidney disease and low-grade acidosis (BiCARB): a pragmatic randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Med 2020;18:91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Mendoza FJ, Lopez I, Montes de Oca A, et al. Metabolic acidosis inhibits soft tissue calcification in uremic rats. Kidney Int 2008;73:407–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Bushinsky D, Coe FL, Moe O. Nephrolithiasis. In: Brenner BM, ed. The Kidney WB Saunders; 2008:1299–1349. [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Aigner C, Cejka D, Sliber C, et al. Oral sodium bicarbonate supplementation does not affect serum calcification propensity in patients with chronic kidney disease and chronic metabolic acidosis. Kidney Blood Press Res 2019;44:188–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Kendrick J, Shah P, Andrews E, et al. Effect of treatment of metabolic acidosis on vascular endothelial function in patients with CKD: a pilot randomized cross-over study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018;13:1463–1470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Haarhaus M, Evenepoel P. Differentiating the causes of adynamic bone in advanced chronic kidney disease informs osteoporosis treatment. Kidney Int 2021;100:546–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Bushinsky DA, Sessler NE, Krieger NS. Greater unidirectional calcium efflux from bone during metabolic, compared with respiratory, acidosis. Am J Physiol 1992;262:F425–F431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Frick KK, Bushinsky DA. Effect of metabolic and respiratory acidosis on intracellular calcium in osteoblasts. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2010;299: 418–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Ori Y, Lee SG, Krieger NS, et al. Osteoblastic intracellular pH and calcium in metabolic and respiratory acidosis. Kidney Int 1995;47:1790–1796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Bushinsky DA. Efffects of medium acidification by alteration of carbon dioxide or bicarbonate concentrations on the resorptive activity of ral osteoclasts. J Bone Mineral Res 1994;9:1839–1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Bushinsky DA, Parker WR, Alexander KM, et al. Metabolic, but not respiratory, acidosis increases bone PGE2 levels and calcium release. Am J Physiol 2001;281:F1058–F1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES