Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 May 13;7(20):17483–17491. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02021

Functionalized MOF as a Sensitive Spectroscopic Probe for Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ions Detection in Aqueous Media

Wesam Abd El-Fattah †,, Eida S Al-Farraj , Naoufel Ben Hamadi , Ahmed Alharbi §, Ahmed Shahat ∥,*
PMCID: PMC9134411  PMID: 35647427

Abstract

graphic file with name ao2c02021_0008.jpg

A modified metal–organic framework (MOF) named Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br was synthesized via a Schiff-base reaction between the MOFs (Al-MIL-53-NH2) and 5-bromo salicylaldehyde. The robust functionalized Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br was used as a novel spectrophotometric sensor for detecting Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions. In a wide range of concentrations, the absorption spectral intensity of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br increased linearly upon increasing the concentration of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions. The limit of detection (LOD) of the proposed Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor reached 1.52 ppm of Hg2+ ion (7.56 × 10–9 M). Therefore, this study introduces a novel ratiometric Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions chemosensor. Simple treatment using thiourea or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid can remove the metal ions from the used sensor and use it many times with a high efficiency. In addition, the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor has a high adsorption capacity for these metal ions. The design of the robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor provided high stability, reproducibility, selectivity, high sensitivity, and a facile sensing design. Furthermore, the good absorption spectral stability of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br in aqueous media, the broad linear in sensing, and the low LOD of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions show its high potential in determining these ions in real water.

Introduction

Heavy metal pollution is one of the most important challenges throughout the world in recent years, as city expansion and industries have increased. Environmental toxins have gotten a lot of attention since they may build up in the body of the human over time via the food chain, causing illnesses and difficulties. Some heavy metals, such as manganese, cobalt, copper, and zinc, are essential for living organisms, but extreme doses can be harmful.1,2

Mercury is ejected into the atmosphere naturally through volcanic explosions, earthquakes, and leakage from the earth’s crust, among other things. Mercury may also be present in the form of mercury compounds, which are manufactured for industrial uses, either directly or indirectly, and practically everyone is exposed to it.3 Mercury and its salts have been employed in medicinal purposes, such as laxatives since ancient times, skin ointments, diuretics, and antiseptics. In addition, it is still commonly utilized in amalgam dental fillings today. Mercury exposure has been correlated to a variety of health problems, such as neurological symptoms, kidney and brain damage, and hormonal and immunological alterations, according to several pieces of research.4 Because mercury has a high sensitivity to the neurological system, it can produce hallucinations, altered awareness, and other permanent life-threatening effects.5

Because it is an essential component of the vitamin B12 complex and the major metallic component of thiamine, cobalt plays a significant role in a variety of physiological activities. High levels of cobalt in the human body, on the other hand, can impair heart muscles, produce an overproduction of red blood cells, irritate the lungs, induce bone abnormalities, and hurt the thyroid gland.6,7 Furthermore, a lack of cobalt in the human body can result in severe retardation, anorexia, and megaloblastic anemia.6 As a result, there is a growing interest and need for a cost-effective, quick, easy, and sensitive approach for detecting metals in environmental samples.

Aluminum is a common metal that causes both biotoxicity and phytotoxicity. Furthermore, aluminum is detrimental to plant growth as a result of its rapid restriction on root growth and significant unfavorable impacts on nutrient uptake.8 Aluminum has been reported to affect the blood–brain barrier since it is simply absorbed by the central nervous system and accumulates in the brain under normal physiological settings.9 As a result, aluminum poses a serious public health risk, as it may induce memory loss and cognitive impairment, leading to neurotoxic disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease.10 As a result, the amount of Al3+ ions in drinking water and surface water is strictly controlled by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).11

As a result, establishing a detection technique for these metals with a high selectivity and sensitivity is critical for the environment and human health, as they can pose serious threats to the human health and the ecosystem. To date, a variety of procedures for determining these metals have been published, including spectroscopy, high-performance liquid chromatography, atomic absorption spectroscopy, neutron activation analysis, and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectrometry. Because of its particular features, such as low cost, easy detection, fast reaction time, and high sensitivity, the spectrophotometric method is the highly appealing methodology utilized to detect low analyte concentrations among the detection methods.12 Regardless, a variety of chemosensors have been described in order to detect these metals; ratiometric and spectrophotometric sensors are still under development.

During the previous two decades, a type of very porous material, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), has gotten a lot of attention. MOFs have a structural variety and an unrivaled tenability, in addition to a wide range of potential uses, including medication delivery,13 catalysis,14 separations,15 gas storage,16 and sensing.17 The need for adding appropriate recognition sites into MOFs to create a unique receptor has risen dramatically in tandem as a result of the advancement of MOF chemistry since it can improve the qualities of specialized applications. However, many chemical functions are incompatible conditions for MOF assembly.18 Postsynthetic modification (PSM) is an easy and efficient approach for chemically tailing the inside of MOFs. Many materials with diverse physical and chemical characteristics may be created. PSM may introduce a variety of organic functional groups into MOF pores, including halides, alcohols, amines, imines, and azides.1923

In this work, a novel ratiometric and spectrophotometric sensor for Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ion detection based on a functionalized MOF named Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br has been reported. The synthesis of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br was via a Schiff-base reaction in which a covalent attachment was found between the MOFs (Al-MIL-53-NH2) and 5-bromo salicylaldehyde. The spectral properties of the robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor show it as a highly sensitive sensor for detecting the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions. Under the optimum conditions, the selectivity of the developed Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was examined in the company of several interfering ions. The stability of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was also examined after storage for 3 months. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing a facile and highly efficient strategy to prepare smart and robust nanosensors, which can detect Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in aqueous media. The Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor’s field applicability was proven using a tap water sample from the research lab.

Experimental Section

Materials and Reagents

All the compounds utilized in this investigation are readily accessible in the market and were utilized without additional purification. In all our trials, we utilized ultrapure water and ethanol. AlCl3·6H2O (98%) and 2-aminaterephthalic acid (NH2-H2BDC) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Aqueous solutions of Co2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, Na+, K+, Cd2+, Hg2+, and Fe3+ were prepared from their chloride salts. Fe2+ was prepared from ammonium ferrous sulfate and used immediately. All these salts were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co., (St Louis, USA).

Detection of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ions in an Aqueous Solution

The spectroscopic responses of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br to various metal cations in an aqueous solution were studied. At room temperature, Mn+@Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br was prepared by introducing the (5 mg) Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br powder into an aqueous solution (10 mL, 0.2 ppm) of Mn+ (Mn+ = Co2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, Na+, K+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+). After that, the mixes were 10 s of sonication to create the metal-ion-included suspension that was employed in the spectrophotometric measurements.

Recognition of the Ultratrace of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ions

In a variety of pH solutions, the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was used to determine a definite concentration of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions. About 5 mg of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was added to a series of 10 mL solutions adjusted raising pH values (within 2–11 range) and containing 0.1 ppm of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions. These solutions were then sonicated for 10 s. The suspension Mn+@Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br was analyzed by UV–vis spectrometry after equilibration, in which the signal saturation of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br nanosensor absorbance spectrum was reached.

Removal of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ions from Aqueous Media

50 mg of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was in the middle of two frits (1/16, 20 m, Análisis Vnicos, Tomelloso, Spain) into a 1 mL propylene cartridge that is empty (Análisis Vnicos) for the solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges. Then, 10 mL of 5.0 ppm of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions solutions at pH 8.0, 8.0, and 7.0, respectively, at a flow rate of 0.1 mL min–1, were put onto the SPE material. The Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions were measured before and after the elimination, a procedure using an ICP-atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES).

Determination of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ions in Tap Water

The Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor’s field applicability was proven using a tap water sample from the research lab. The water samples were spiked with various quantities of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions, followed by a recovery experiment. Finally, spectrophotometric measurements were performed, and the findings were compared with the ICP-AES results.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of the Prepared Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br Sensor

The experimental PXRD pattern of the synthesized Al-MIL-53-NH2 was quite like the one that had been prepared before.21 The sharp peaks in Figure S1 demonstrate the framework’s excellent crystallinity and confirm the successful fabrication of Al-MIL-53-NH2. Because the amine groups were not implicated in the construction of the framework in this study, they are capable of undergoing chemical changes. The product generated as Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br was described using PXRD analysis after the amine groups interacted with 5-bromo salicylaldehyde (Scheme 1). There was no obvious loss of crystallinity following imine production, and the fundamental lattice structure of the MOF Al-MIL-53-NH2 did not change after postsynthesis (Figure S1).2123 Furthermore, the hue shifted from light yellow of the MOF Al-MIL-53-NH2 to pale red of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br, indicating the successful imine formation. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was also used to demonstrate the production of C=N, as shown in Figure S2. In the framework of Al-MIL-53-NH2, the two distinctive vibrational bands of the free −NH2 group occur at 3496 and 3383 cm–1. In the spectrum of the robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br, the intensity of these two bands had significantly decreased, demonstrating that there was little unreacted −NH2 within the pores of the Al-MIL-53-NH2.2123 The bending vibrational mode of the NH2 group is responsible for the a rather strong band that occurs at 1580 cm–1. In the postsynthetic functionalized Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br IR spectra, this sharp peak had also decreased, and a new band subsequent to the C=N group developed at 1434 cm–1.22,23 The band corresponding to 2-aminoterephthalic acid’s C–N stretching vibrations shifted from 1010 to 1000 cm–1, indicating the amino group’s transition. As indicated in Scheme 1, the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br possesses two binding sites (N and O) that can be coordinated with metal ions.

Scheme 1. Synthetic Route to the Condensation of the 5-Bromo Salicylaldehyde with Al-MIL-53-NH2 and Formation of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br Sensor.

Scheme 1

The Al-MIL-53-NH2 and Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br nanoparticles are both made up of consistently formed nanoparticles with diameters between 50 and 100 nm, according to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) pictures (Figure 1). It shows that, following functionalization, Al-MIL-53-NH2 was stable. We also found that, after reacting 5-bromo salicylaldehyde with Al-MIL-53-NH2, particle size and shape remained nearly unchanged. Figure S3 shows the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of Al-MIL-53-NH2 and Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br. After reacting 5-bromo salicylaldehyde with Al-MIL-53-NH2, the BET surface area of Al-MIL-53-NH2 decreased from 667 to 584 m2 g–1. This shows that despite the 5-bromo salicylaldehyde interacting with the amino group, the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br still has well-structured channels and a large surface area.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

FESEM and TEM images of (A,C) the Al-MIL-53-NH2 and (B,D) Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br.

Detection of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ions

The potential of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br for sensing the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in an aqueous solution was examined. The as-prepared Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br (5 mg) samples were finely powdered and suspended in aqueous solutions containing various metal ions (Co2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, Na+, K+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+) (10 mL, 0.5 ppm). The solution was then ultrasonically mixed for 10 s to create the metal-ion-included MOF suspension. At room temperature, these metal ions were detected spectrophotometrically. The corresponding absorption spectra reveal that different metal ions have varied impacts on the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br absorption spectrum. When Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cd2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+ react with Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br, the absorption intensity at 394 nm stays essentially unaltered and only displays a little or minor influence. After contact with the ions Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+, the absorption intensity of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br dramatically rises (Figure 3). This property might be beneficial for detecting Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions selectively using the absorption spectra increase when Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions are added to the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor. The mechanism for the interaction of the sensor Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br with the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions was investigated. As shown in Scheme 1, the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions can be coordinated with the nitrogen of the imine group and the oxygen of the phenolic group of the 5-bromo salicylaldehyde.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Absorption spectra of 5 mg of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br distributed in 10 mL aqueous solutions with various concentrations of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br (A) Hg2+ ions at pH 8, (B) Co2+ at pH 8, and (C) Al3+ at pH 7.

The effect of pH for detecting the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions was tested by measuring the absorption spectra of 10 mL solutions containing 0.5 ppm of Hg2+, Co2+, or Al3+ at different pH values ranging from 2 to 11 using buffer solutions. Figure 2A indicates that the maximum intensities of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor were at pH of 8.0, 8.0, and 7.0 for detecting the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions, respectively. To detect the appropriate amount of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor for detecting the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions, a wide range (1–10 mg) of the sensor was used. The concentrations of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions were kept constant (0.5 ppm) at their optimal pHs. The results of the signal responses demonstrated in Figure 2B showed that, with increasing the amount of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor, the absorption spectral intensity increases till it reaches a maximum value when using 5.0 mg of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of pH on the signal response for the detection of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions (0.5 ppm) using 5 mg of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor at room temperature (A). Effect of the amount of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor on the signal response for the detection of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions (0.5 ppm) at room temperature and pH 8.0, 8.0, and 7.0, respectively (B).

Analytical Parameters and the Calibration Graph

The robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor’s physical features, such as its porosity, particle size morphology, and large surface area, are beneficial in allowing binding of the target ions in sensing assays and a high recognition capacity. The concentration-dependent absorption measurements were taken to better quantify the response of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor’s absorption spectra to Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions. Therefore, in the detection of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions, the intensities of the absorption bands can be used as a reference parameter. The specific detection range (DR) of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ion-sensing device was determined by spectrophotometric research employing UV–vis spectroscopy. It was performed by watching the signaling change in the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor’s absorbance spectra after the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions were added. As shown in Figure 3, the absorption intensities of the suspension Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor increase accordingly upon the increase in the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ concentrations. These can enable the calibrating measurement of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in the concentration range from 0.0 to 0.148 ppm (Figure 4). The chemical Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor provided a one-step and easy detecting approach for the measurement of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions without the use of complicated instruments, according to the findings. With a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.998, the calibration curves roughly follow a linear connection between the absorption intensities and the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ concentrations, as shown in Figure 4. The limit of detection (LOD) calculated from the standard deviation (SD) of the blank and calibration sensitivity (slope of calibration line) LOD = 3.3 SD/sensitivity24 was calculated for each metal ion, as shown in Table 1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Absorption spectra of 5 mg of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br distributed in 10 mL aqueous solutions with various concentrations of (A) Hg2+ ions at pH 8, (B) Co2+ at pH 8, and (C) Al3+ at pH 7.

Table 1. Efficiency of the Suspension Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br Sensor in Terms of Accessibility and Sensitivity during the Recognition of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ionsa.

metal ion pH Rt (S) LOD (ppb) (M) LOQ (ppb) (M) DR (ppb) (M)
Hg2+ 8 30 1.52 4.60 0.09–27.9
      7.56 × 10–9 2.29 × 10–8 4.98 × 10–10 to 1.49 × 10–7
Co2+ 8 30 0.60 1.82 0.09–39.8
      1.02 × 10–8 3.10 × 10–8 1.69 × 10–9 to 6.78 × 10–7
Al3+ 7 30 2.14 6.50 9.99–49.7
      7.95 × 10–8 2.41 × 10–7 3.71 × 10–7 to 1.85 × 10–6
a

Limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ), detection range (DR), and response-time (Rt) by the second (s).

At low concentrations of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions, the calibration plots of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor revealed a linear association (Figure 4, insets). These curves revealed that Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions have the highest sensitivity over a wide range of concentrations. The low LOD obtained (see Table 1) revealed that the generated Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor had a better identification of the target ions than reagents/sensors produced using other methods.2542Table 2 shows a comparison of our Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor’s results with several previously described techniques for determining Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions using other reagents/sensors. Our suggested Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor has a lower LOD than the other reagents/sensors, according to the data.

Table 2. Spectrophotometric Results for Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ Ion Determination Using Various Previously Published Reagents/Sensors and Our Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br Sensor.

metal ion reagent/sensor DR LOD refs
Hg2+ iodide and rhodamine B 25–1350 10 (25)
  bis(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)methanethione on MOF 0.5–150 0.8 (26)
  xylidyl blue 20–1000 4.65 (27)
  2-mercaptobenzothiazole 25–2500 7.0 (28)
  diphenylthiocarbazone 100–2500 20 (29)
  5-methylthiophene–2-carboxaldehyde ethylenediamine 830–8600 17.9 (30)
  Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br 0.09–27.9 1.52 this work
Co2+ bis(salicylaldehyde)orthophenylenediamine 100–15,000 15 (31)
  2-[2-cefpodoxime proxtel azo]2-paracetamole 1000–7000 500 (32)
  1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride 150–2000 70 (33)
  5-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione 500–14,000 11 (34)
  1-[4-[(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylideneamino] phenyl]ethanone 0.45–10 0.08 (35)
  (Z)-2-((2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)diazenyl)terephthalic acid on silica nanotubes 5–240 4.55 (36)
  Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br 0.09–39.8 0.60 this work
Al3+ 8-hydroxyquinoline 0.1–20.0 0.032 (37)
  6-hydroxychromone-3-carbaldehyde-(3′-hydroxy-2′-naphthaleneformyl) hydrazone 270–1350 80 (38)
  aurintricarboxylic acid ammonium salt on mesoporous silica nanospheres 2.0–70 3.5 (39)
  quercetin on cetyltrimethylammonium bromide 20–500 7 (40)
  2,20,3,4-tetrahydroxy-30,50-disulphoazobenzene 50–1600 5 (41)
  alizarin red S 5.0–320 2 (42)
  Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br 9.99–49.7 2.14 this work

Selectivity

Selectivity, in addition to sensitivity, is a significant consideration for evaluating the performance of the proposed Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor. The selectivity of the developed Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor in the occurrence of numerous interfering ions was investigated in the optimal circumstances mentioned above. First, the interfering cations and anions were introduced to the robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor under ion-sensing conditions with known concentrations (5.0 ppm). The cations used for this study are Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cd2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+. Also, the anions used are Cl, CO32–, SO42–, and PO43– (5.0 ppm). The absorption spectra of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor (blank) for Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions did not vary much at max, according to our findings (Figure 5). The ion tolerance limit was set at the highest level, resulted in an absorbance measurement error of less than 5%. Except for Cu2+ and Ni2+, which were well masked using 0.2 M S2O32–, the majority of the interfering ions did not create a significant interference. The Hg2+ ions were easily determined using the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor in the presence of Al3+ ions by adding 0.1 M acetate as a masking agent. It was observed that there is no effect of anions on the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor. The Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was also unaffected by huge concentrations of alkaline metal or alkaline-earth metal ions. This demonstrates that other metal ions’ interference may be ignored.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Under ideal conditions, the absorption spectra of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor (blank) following numerous foreign cations and anion additions (pH 8.0, 8.0, and 7.0; 5 mg of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor and 10 mL volume). The cations listed are 5.0 ppm of Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cd2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+. The interfering anions are 5.0 ppm of Cl, CO32–, SO42–, and PO43–. (A) Hg2+ ions at pH 8, (B) Co2+ at pH 8, and (C) Al3+ at pH 7.

Ion-Reversible Sensing System

Hg2+ was effectively removed from the utilized sensor after a simple treatment with 0.2 M thiourea as a stripping agent. The Co2+ and Al3+ ions were also removed from the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor using 0.2 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). To release the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions and get a “metal-free” probe surface, we repeated these procedures numerous times using a liquid exchange technique. After various regeneration/reuse cycles (i.e., 6), the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor showed just a little influence on sensitivity. The robust covalent link between the 5-bromo salicylaldehyde and the amino of the Al-MIL-53-NH2 structure accounts for the sensor’s excellent efficiency after a six times reversibility.

Stability of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br Sensor

The optical sensor is technically advantageous due to the extended shelf-life of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor efficiency. The robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was tested for long-term storage for at least 3 months. Controlling the potential leaching of the chromophore during storage was achieved by a direct condensation of 5-bromo salicylaldehyde with Al-MIL-53-NH2, direct adsorption, or without the application of any surface modification. The absorption spectra of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor did not change after 3 months of storage in a dark container, according to our findings. The Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br solid sensor has significantly superior stability than sensors based on the physisorbed probe molecules.4353 The Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor, which uses a direct condensation of 5-bromo salicylaldehyde with Al-MIL-53-NH2, offers a simple sensing design concerning sensitivity, selectivity, repeatability, and shelf-life.

Adsorption Capacity

The amount of sorbent required for the quantitative holding of the analyte from a solution is determined by the sorption capacity. Under the conditions described above, this material was utilized as an SPE sorbent to test the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor’s adsorption capability. The resulting capacity of the sorbent was 88.3, 100.8, and 104.4 mg of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions per gram of the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor, respectively. As a result, the robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor may also be utilized as a basic preconcentrator.

Application

The developed Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br probe was tested on a tap water sample acquired from our lab to assess the field applicability of our detection technology. The tap water sample was further polluted with standard solutions of these ions since the contamination by Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in the tap water sample were lower than the designed sensor’s LOD. This approach was repeated five times and yielded the same result, indicating that our sensor has a good accuracy and performance. The sensitivity of this solid Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor was compared to results gained by the ICP-AES. The results of both Milli-Q water and tap water analyzed by our robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br nanosensor are found to be in excellent agreement with those gotten by ICP-AES with a confidence level of 95% and a relative SD (RSD %) that has not increased more than 1.68%, as shown in Table 3. Therefore, this confirms the utility of the developed Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br nanosensor for the detection of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in real water samples. Table 3 shows also that the recoveries of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions were between 99.0 and 102.8%. Although the genuine samples are complicated and contain components that might cause calculations to fail, the spiked Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions can be retrieved with great precision from these samples. This suggests that the suggested approach may be utilized to determine Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in actual samples with a good selectivity and sensitivity.

Table 3. Spectrophotometric Method Results in the Determination of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ in the Milli-Q Water and Tap Water Samples Using the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br Sensor.

        Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br senor
samples metal ion added (ppb) founda (ppb) ICP-AES founda (ppb) SDa (RSD %) recovery (%)
Milli-Q water Hg2+ 15 14.90 15.02 0.058 0.38 100.8
    30 30.02 29.96 0.337 1.12 99.8
    50 50.02 49.98 0.048 0.09 99.9
  Co2+ 15 15.02 14.98 0.048 0.32 99.7
    30 30.10 29.81 0.414 1.38 99.0
    50 50.01 49.95 0.169 0.33 99.8
  Al3+ 15 15.01 14.99 0.185 1.23 99.8
    30 30.04 30.24 0.508 1.68 100.6
    50 50.00 49.95 0.110 0.22 99.9
tap water Hg2+ 15 15.09 15.08 0.113 0.75 99.93
    30 29.19 30.02 0.185 0.62 102.8
    50 50.5 50.11 0.101 0.20 99.2
  Co2+ 15 15.10 15.25 0.155 1.02 100.9
    30 30.07 30.22 0.162 0.54 100.4
    50 50.19 50.14 0.056 0.11 99.9
  Al3+ 15 15.29 15.23 0.109 0.73 99.6
    30 30.30 30.31 0.153 0.51 100.0
    50 50.25 50.29 0.085 0.17 100.1
a

Mean of five determinations at the 95% confidence level.

Conclusions

A solvothermal process was used to make a strong MOF (Al-MIL-53-NH2). The amine group of the Al-MIL-53-NH2 was transformed into an imine group via a Schiff-base reaction with 5-bromo salicylaldehyde. FTIR spectroscopy was used to assess if the imine group formed successfully. The fundamental lattice structure of Al-MIL-53-NH2 was not affected during the imine production stage, according to the results. The absorption properties of the as-prepared functionalized Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br were also investigated. The results show that the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br can be used as an ultrasensitive sensor for Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions. The mechanism of the sensor’s interaction with the analyte was studied. The absorption spectral intensity of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br linearly increased upon increasing the concentration of Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in a wide range of concentrations, with a detection limit of 1.52 ppm of Hg2+ ion (7.56 × 10–9). Thus, it is believed that the robust Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br probe is an outstanding candidate for the detection of the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions, with a high sensitivity and an insignificant effect of competitive ions. According to ICH criteria, the recommended techniques were validated in terms of LOD, LOQ, linearity, and accuracy. Simple treatment using thiourea or EDTA can remove out the Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions from the used Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor and use it many times with a high efficiency. In addition, the Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br sensor has a high adsorption capacity for these metal ions. This is the first research to our knowledge that shows a simple and efficient technique for making a smart and robust nanosensor that can detect Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions in aqueous media. In actual samples, the suggested approach may be utilized to determine Hg2+, Co2+, and Al3+ ions with a good selectivity and sensitivity.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University for funding this work through Research Group no. RG-21-09-71.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c02021.

  • Detailed procedure for the synthesis of 5-bromo salicylaldehyde, preparation of Al-MIL-53-NH2, preparation of Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br, X-ray diffraction pattern of Al-MIL-53-NH2 and Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br, FTIR image of the Al-MIL-53-NH2 and Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br, and nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of Al-MIL-53-NH2 and Al-MIL-53-N=SA-Br (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao2c02021_si_001.pdf (536KB, pdf)

References

  1. Wang L.; Zhou J.-B.; Wang X.; Wang Z.-H.; Zhao R.-S. Simultaneous determination of copper, cobalt, and mercury ions in water samples by solid-phase extraction using carbon nanotube sponges as adsorbent after chelating with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate before high performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 4445–4453. 10.1007/s00216-016-9542-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sorouraddin S. M.; Nouri S. Simultaneous temperature-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of cobalt, copper, nickel and zinc ions from high-volume water samples and determination by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 1396–1404. 10.1039/c5ay03288a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Magos L.; Clarkson T. W. Overview of the clinical toxicity of mercury. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2006, 43, 257–268. 10.1258/000456306777695654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerhard I.; Waibel S.; Daniel V.; Runnebaum B. Impact of heavy metals on hormonal and immunological factors in women with repeated miscarriages. Hum. Reprod. Update 1998, 4, 301–309. 10.1093/humupd/4.3.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. El-Safty S. A.; Shenashen M. A.; El-Safty S. A. Mercury-ion optical sensors. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 38, 98–115. 10.1016/j.trac.2012.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghoochani Moghadam A.; Rajabi M.; Hemmati M.; Asghari A. Development of effervescence-assisted liquid phase microextraction based on fatty acid for determination of silver and cobalt ions using micro-sampling flame atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 242, 1176–1183. 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.07.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stanisz E.; Werner J. Task-Specific Ionic Liquid-Based Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Determination of Cobalt Ions by Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Anal. Lett. 2017, 50, 2884. 10.1080/00032719.2017.1322095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Álvarez-Rodríguez E.; Fernández-Marcos M. L.; Monterroso C.; Fernández-Sanjurjo M. J. Application of aluminium toxicity indices to soils under various forest species. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 211, 227–239. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zatta P.; Ibn-Lkhayat-Idrissi M.; Zambenedetti P.; Kilyen M.; Kiss T. In vivo and in vitro effects of aluminum on the activity of mouse brain acetylcholinesterase. Brain Res. Bull. 2002, 59, 41–45. 10.1016/s0361-9230(02)00836-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kepp K. P. Bioinorganic Chemistry of Alzheimer’s Disease. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5193–5239. 10.1021/cr300009x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pal S.; Sen B.; Mukherjee M.; Patra M.; Lahiri S.; Chattopadhyay P. Selective and sensitive turn-on chemosensor for Al(iii) ions applicable in living organisms: nanomolar detection in aqueous medium. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 72508. 10.1039/c5ra13478a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aguilera-Sigalat J.; Bradshaw D. A colloidal water-stable MOF as a broad-range fluorescent pH sensor via post-synthetic modification. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4711–4713. 10.1039/c4cc00659c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernini M. C.; Fairen-Jimenez D.; Pasinetti M.; Ramirez-Pastor A. J.; Snurr R. Q. Screening of bio-compatible metal–organic frameworks as potential drug carriers using Monte Carlo simulations. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 766–774. 10.1039/c3tb21328e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu Z.-L.; Wang C.-H.; Zhao B.; Dong J.; Lu F.; Wang W.-H.; Wang W.-C.; Wu G.-J.; Cui J.-Z.; Cheng P. A Semi-Conductive Copper–Organic Framework with Two Types of Photocatalytic Activity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4938. 10.1002/anie.201508325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Habila M.; Alhenaki B.; El-Marghany A.; Sheikh M.; Ghfar A.; ALOthman Z.; Soylak M. Metal organic frameworks enhanced dispersive solid phase microextraction of malathion before detection by UHPLC-MS/MS. J. Sep. Sci. 2020, 43, 3103–3109. 10.1002/jssc.202000033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li L.; Tang S.; Wang C.; Lv X.; Jiang M.; Wu H.; Zhao X. High gas storage capacities and stepwise adsorption in a UiO type metal–organic framework incorporating Lewis basic bipyridyl sites. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 2304. 10.1039/c3cc48275h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pinar Gumus Z.; Soylak M. Metal organic frameworks as nanomaterials for analysis of toxic metals in food and environmental applications. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 143, 116417. 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang X.; Xia T.; Jiang K.; Cui Y.; Yang Y.; Qian G. Highly sensitive and selective detection of mercury(II) based on a zirconium metal-organic framework in aqueous media. J. Solid State Chem. 2017, 253, 277. 10.1016/j.jssc.2017.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cohen S. M. Postsynthetic Methods for the Functionalization of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 970–1000. 10.1021/cr200179u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu S.-Y.; Yan B. A novel covalent post-synthetically modified MOF hybrid as a sensitive and selective fluorescent probe for Al3+ detection in aqueous media. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 1674. 10.1039/c7dt04266c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sánchez-Sánchez M.; Getachew N.; Díaz K.; García M. D.; Chebude Y.; Díaz I. Synthesis of metal–organic frameworks in water at room temperature: salts as linker sources. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 1500–1509. 10.1039/C4GC01861C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saleh M. A.; Mohamed M. A.; Shahat A.; Allam N. K. Sensitive Determination of SARS-COV-2 and the Anti-hepatitis C Virus Agent Velpatasvir Enabled by Novel Metal–Organic Frameworks. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 26791–26798. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shahat A.; Elsalam S. A.; Herrero-Martínez J. M.; Simó-Alfonso E. F.; Ramis-Ramos G. Optical Recognition and Removal of Hg2+ Using a New Self-Chemosensor Based on a Modified Amino-Functionalized Al-MOF. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2017, 253, 164–172. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1), Current Step 4 version, Nov 1996: Geneva, 2005.
  25. Loo A. Y. Y.; Lay Y. P.; Kutty M. G.; Timpe O. Spectrophotometric determination of mercury with iodide and rhodamine B. Sains Malays. 2012, 41, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  26. Radwan A.; El-Sewify I. M.; Shahat A.; Azzazy H. M. E.; Khalil M. M. H.; El-Shahat M. F. Multiuse Al-MOF Chemosensors for Visual Detection and Removal of Mercury Ions in Water and Skin-Whitening Cosmetics. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15097–15107. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03592. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nekouei F.; Nekouei S. Spectrophotometric determination of mercury(II) by simultaneous micelle mediated extraction through ternary complex formation in water samples. Orient. J. Chem. 2014, 30, 867–871. 10.13005/ojc/300266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jeoung M.-S.; Choi H.-S. Spectrophotometric determination of trace Hg2+ in cetyltrimethylammonium bromide media. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2004, 25, 1877–1881. 10.5012/bkcs.2004.25.12.1877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ahmed M. J.; Alam M. S. A rapid spectrophotometric method for the determination of mercury in environmental, biological, soil and plant samples using diphenylthiocarbazone. Spectroscopy 2003, 17, 45–52. 10.1155/2003/250927. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Deepa K.; Raj Y. P.; Lingappa Y. Spectrophotometric determination of Mercury in environmental samples using 5-methylthiophene-2-carboxaldehyde ethylenediamine (MTCED). Der Pharma Chem. 2014, 6, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ahmed M. J.; Uddin M. N. A simple spectrophotometric method for the determination of cobalt in industrial, environmental, biological and soil samples using bis(salicylaldehyde)orthophenylenediamine. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 2020–2027. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Al-Yousefi D. A.; Ali I. R. Spectrophotometric determination of transition elements by cloud point extraction with use laboratory by thiazol azo reagent and applied in environmental samples. AIP Conf. Proc. 2022, 2386, 030007. 10.1063/5.0067206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Habibi Z.; Bamdad F. Simultaneous Determination of Traces of Cobalt and Iron Ions after Pre-concentration by Surface-active Ionic Liquid-assisted Cloud Point Microextraction. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Res. 2022, 9, 243–250. 10.22036/ABCR.2021.311802.1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Alieva K. R. Spectrophotometric Determination Of Cobalt(II) With 5- (4-Hydroxy-3,5- Dimethylbenzilidene)Thiazolidine-2,4-Dione. J. Multidiscip. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2021, 8, 14609–14613. [Google Scholar]
  35. Al-Saidi H. M.; Alharthi S. S. Efficiency enhancement of the spectrophotometric estimation of cobalt in waters and pharmaceutical preparations using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and microcells with long optical paths. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2021, 253, 119552. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Abou-Melha K. S.; Al-Hazmi G. A. A.; Habeebullah T. M.; Althagafi I.; Othman A.; El-Metwaly N. M.; Shaaban F.; Shahat A. Functionalized silica nanotubes with azo-chromophore for enhanced Pd2+ and Co2+ ions monitoring in E-wastes. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 329, 115585. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Panhwar A. H.; Tuzen M.; Kazi T. G. Deep eutectic solvent based advance microextraction method for determination of aluminum in water and food samples: Multivariate study. Talanta 2018, 178, 588–593. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.09.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pang B.-j.; Li C.-r.; Yang Z.-y. A novel chromone and rhodamine derivative as fluorescent probe for the detection of Zn(II) and Al(III) based on two different mechanisms. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2018, 204, 641–647. 10.1016/j.saa.2018.06.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Aljuhani E.; Hameed A.; Al-Ahmed Z. A.; Almahri A.; Habeebullah T. M.; Shahat A.; El-Metwaly N. M. Eco-friendly green synthesis of functionalized mesoporous silica nanospheres for the determination of Al(III) ions in multiple samples of different kinds of water. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103419. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Norfun P.; Pojanakaroon T.; Liawraungrath S. Reverse flow injection spectrophotometric for determination of aluminium(III). Talanta 2010, 82, 202–207. 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Huseyinli A. A.; Alieva R.; Haciyeva S.; Güray T. Spectrophotometric determination of aluminium and indium with 2,2,3,4- tetrahydroxy-3,5-disulphoazobenzene. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 1001–1007. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Santos E. J.; Fantin E. B.; Paixão R. E.; Herrmanna A. B.; Sturgeon R. E. Spectrophotometric Determination of Aluminium in Hemodialysis Water. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2015, 26, 2384–2388. 10.5935/0103-5053.20150224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shahat A.; Hassan H. M. A.; El-Shahat M. F.; El Shahawy O.; Awual M. R. A ligand-anchored optical composite material for efficient vanadium(II) adsorption and detection in wastewater. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 10324–10335. 10.1039/c9nj01818b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shahat A.; Trupp S. Sensitive, selective, and rapid method for optical recognition of ultra-traces level of Hg(II), Ag(I), Au(III), and Pd(II) in electronic wastes. Sens. Actuators, B 2017, 245, 789–802. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shahat A.; Mohamed M. H.; Awual M. R.; Mohamed S. K. Novel and potential chemical sensors for Au(III) ion detection and recovery in electric waste samples. Microchem. J. 2020, 158, 105312. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Shahat A.; Kubra K. T.; Salman M. S.; Hasan M. N.; Hasan M. M. Novel solid-state sensor material for efficient cadmium(II) detection and capturing from wastewater. Microchem. J. 2021, 164, 105967. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.105967. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Awual M. R. A novel facial composite adsorbent for enhanced copper(II) detection and removal from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 266, 368–375. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Awual M. R. Solid phase sensitive palladium(II) ions detection and recovery using ligand based efficient conjugate nanomaterials. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 300, 264–272. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Awual M. R.; Yaita T.; Shiwaku H. Design a novel optical adsorbent for simultaneous ultra-trace cerium(III) detection, sorption and recovery. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 327–335. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Awual M. R. Assessing of lead(III) capturing from contaminated wastewater using ligand doped conjugate adsorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 289, 65–73. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Awual M. R.; Hasan M. M. A ligand based innovative composite material for selective lead(II) capturing from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 294, 111679. 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111679. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kubra K. T.; Salman M. S.; Hasan M. N.; Islam A.; Hasan M. M.; Awual M. R. Utilizing an alternative composite material for effective copper(II) ion capturing from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 336, 116325. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Awual M. R.; Yaita T.; Shiwaku H.; Suzuki S. A sensitive ligand embedded nano-conjugate adsorbent for effective cobalt(II) ions capturing from contaminated water. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 276, 1–10. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao2c02021_si_001.pdf (536KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES