Abstract
Elevated levels of Mucin-16 (MUC16) in conjunction with a high expression of truncated O-glycans is implicated in playing crucial roles in the malignancy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the mechanisms by which such aberrant glycoforms present on MUC16 itself promote an increased disease burden in PDAC are yet to be elucidated. This study demonstrates that the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic deletion of MUC16 in PDAC cells decreases tumor cell migration. We found that MUC16 enhances tumor malignancy by activating the integrin-linked kinase and focal adhesion kinase (ILK/FAK)-signaling axis. These findings are especially noteworthy in truncated O-glycan (Tn and STn antigen)-expressing PDAC cells. Activation of these oncogenic-signaling pathways resulted in part from interactions between MUC16 and integrin complexes (α4β1), which showed a stronger association with aberrant glycoforms of MUC16. Using a monoclonal antibody to functionally hinder MUC16 significantly reduced the migratory cascades in our model. Together, these findings suggest that truncated O-glycan containing MUC16 exacerbates malignancy in PDAC by activating FAK signaling through specific interactions with α4 and β1 integrin complexes on cancer cell membranes. Targeting these aberrant glycoforms of MUC16 can aid in the development of a novel platform to study and treat metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Keywords: MUC16, integrins, FAK, migration, pancreatic cancer
1. Introduction
The tumor-associated antigen, CA125, is a routinely employed clinical biomarker for monitoring ovarian cancer progression [1,2]. CA125 is an epitope on Mucin-16 (MUC16), a massive (>22,000 amino acids) membrane-bound glycoprotein that is normally expressed in the epithelium of the endometrium, trachea, and cornea and is often upregulated in adenocarcinomas [3,4]. The full-length MUC16 protein contains a heavily glycosylated extracellular domain (ECD) with more than 60 tandem repeats (TR) that harbor binding sites for MUC16-specific antibodies and at least 56 repeated mucin-type domains that contain sea urchin, enterokinase, and agrin (SEA) repeats containing potential proteolytic cleavage sites [5]. Importantly, understanding the role of MUC16 in PDAC becomes pertinent because of its aberrant overexpression in more than 65% of PDAC cases [3]. Malignant transformation, a crucial hallmark of cancer, is often associated with aberrant glycosylation of proteins [6,7]. Mucin-type truncated O-glycosylation structures, such as the Tn (GalNAc-α-Ser/Thr) and STn (sialyl α2-6 GalNAc-α-Ser/Thr) antigens, are aggressively upregulated in most cancers [8,9]. The appearance of tumor-specific Tn and STn antigens occurs in more than 80% of human carcinomas, and in all cases, detection of the STn antigen correlates with poor prognosis and decreased overall survival [10,11]. Interestingly, overexpression of the STn antigen occurs at the highest frequency in pancreatic cancer [12]. Studies previously published by our group and other laboratories have demonstrated that induced expression of truncated Tn and STn antigens on mucins through knockout of the COSMC gene, a unique chaperone required for the function of the enzyme, C1GalT1, enhances the malignant potential of PDAC cells [13,14]. As MUC16 is one of the aberrantly O-glycosylated glycoproteins [15], we sought to investigate the involvement of such truncated O-glycans containing MUC16 in cellular mechanisms that can potentiate pancreatic tumorigenicity.
Cell migration is a dynamic multi-step process regulated by the balance between assembly and disassembly of cell adhesion molecules. Acquisition of migratory and invasive behavior is a necessary characteristic that promotes tumor progression and metastasis. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) mediates a signaling cascade that has been implicated in a plethora of human cancers in the context of cell migration and invasion [16,17]. FAK is shown to directly bind to β-subunits of integrins involved in cell adhesion complexes and instigate a range of downstream signaling cascades, including PI3K/AKT [18,19]. In PDAC, overexpression of FAK and its increased phosphorylation at the active site, Tyrosine 397 (Y397), has been previously reported [20]. In the present study, we put forth a mechanism underlying the highly invasive behavior of PDAC cells expressing truncated O-glycan containing MUC16. Specifically, we demonstrated that the activation of the integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase axis is upregulated in cases with such altered glycosylation of MUC16 to facilitate the cell migration and potential spread of PDAC.
2. Results
2.1. MUC16 Promotes PDAC Malignancy
The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) Discovery and Confirmatory dataset revealed strong upregulation of the MUC16 protein in high-grade PDAC tumors and the different stages of PDAC compared to the normal pancreas (Supplementary Figure S1A,B). There was a significant association between high MUC16 expression in a cohort of 116 PDAC patients and altered receptor-tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways, a highly upregulated and tumor-promoting mechanism in this cancer (Supplementary Figure S1C) [21,22]. Further, in silico studies with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-PAAD pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) dataset [23] revealed a positive correlation between MUC16 and 636 other genes (threshold set to exclude genes with median transcripts per million (TPM) < 0.5) [24]. mRNA levels of crucial pro-metastatic genes in PDAC, like Annexin A1 (ANXA1) [25], showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.54, indicating a strong probability for MUC16 dependent ANXA1 regulation to facilitate pro-tumoral function (Supplementary Table S1). Together, these results suggest that MUC16 expression is highly associated with malignant PDAC.
2.2. Truncated O-Glycan Containing MUC16 Promotes Migratory Behavior in PDAC Cells
It has been previously demonstrated that truncation of mucin-type O-glycans in clinical specimens of PDAC is the result of reduced expression of Core 1 synthase (C1GalT1) and/or its molecular chaperone, COSMC (Core-1 β3 galactosyltransferase specific molecular chaperone) [26]. Such aberrant expression of truncated O-glycan structures (Tn/STn antigen) on premalignant and malignant cells has been shown to enhance their malignant properties [13,27]. However, the molecular and biological mechanisms by which these truncated O-glycan-containing mucins influence pancreatic tumorigenesis are not well understood. Since it was reported that among various mucins, MUC16 possesses a larger number of glycosites in the large N-terminal proline, threonine, and serine (PTS) region [15], we hypothesized that MUC16 has a vital role in enhancing the oncogenic features of truncated O-glycan-expressing PDAC cells. To decipher the molecular mechanisms in detail, we have first disrupted the MUC16 gene, and thereby its expression in wildtype (T3M4 WT and Capan-2 WT) and COSMC knockout (COSMCKO) truncated O-glycan-expressing (SimpleCells (SC); T3M4 SC and Capan-2 SC) PDAC cells using a CRISPR/Cas9-targeting construct [28]. The knockout of MUC16 in these cells was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Figure 1A,B). We have previously demonstrated that PDAC SC cells increased the cell migratory phenotype [14]. Hence, we used the WT, WT-MUC16KO, SC, and SC-MUC16KO cells to investigate the role of truncated O-glycan-containing MUC16 in cell migration. Expectedly, cell migration measured by wound-healing capacity showed that T3M4 WT-MUC16KO cells possessed the lowest migration rate among all the other cells, including their WT counterparts (p = 0.0249), highlighting the importance of MUC16 in cell migration. Wound closure was significantly high in T3M4 SC cells (containing truncated O-glycan-bearing MUC16) as compared to WT cells (containing fully branched O-glycan-bearing MUC16) (p = 0.0369). Notably, even in the highly aggressive T3M4 SC cells, the deletion of MUC16 resulted in significantly lower cell migration (p = 0.0017) (Figure 1C,D). The observed data from the tumor cell migration assay further prompted us to analyze the expression of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) 2/9, as they are paramount players in the in vivo migration process in cancer [29]. The inherent levels of both MMP2 and MMP9 were highest in the SC cells compared to the WT counterparts. Intriguingly, the loss of MUC16 resulted in a significant decrease in the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in both WT and SC cells (Figure 1E). Together, these results demonstrate the critical role of truncated O-glycans and truncated O-glycan-containing MUC16 in enhancing cancer cell migration.
2.3. Aberrant Glycoforms of MUC16 Enhance PDAC Migratory Function via Activation of Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK)
We found that aberrant expression of Tn/STn antigens on MUC16 enhanced migratory properties of PDAC cells; however, the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Therefore, we sought to determine whether truncation of O-glycans activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a differential regulator of cellular motility and invasiveness. Increased expression of FAK (governed by the PTK2 gene) is considered to be a prognostic marker in PDAC and is positively correlated with tumor size [30]. We analyzed the expression of FAK by evaluating mRNA expression of PTK2 in microarray datasets of normal (n = 16) and PDAC tumor tissues (n = 36) in a cohort published by Pei et al. [31]. As compared to normal tissues, PDAC tumor tissues showed significantly higher levels of FAK expression (p = 0.0028) (Figure 2A). This was also validated in our cell line models, wherein increased phosphorylation of FAK at Tyrosine 397 (p-FAK Y397) and its subsequent activation was observed in truncated O-glycan-expressing PDAC cells compared to WT cells (Figure 2B). Further, re-expression of COSMC in truncated O-glycan-expressing PDAC cells (SC-R) (resulting in fully branched O-glycan structures) caused a decrease in expression of p-FAK (Y397) when compared to SC cells (Figure 2C). These results indicate that induced expression of truncated O-glycans enhances migratory properties of PDAC cells via activation of FAK. To determine the role of truncated O-glycan-containing MUC16 in FAK activation, we analyzed the p-FAK levels in WT-MUC16KO and SC-MUC16KO cells. Knock out of MUC16 in T3M4 WT and SC cells showed a significant decrease in FAK phosphorylation (Y397) (Figure 2D). A similar reduction in FAK phosphorylation was also observed in Capan-2 cells upon loss of MUC16 (Figure 2E), demonstrating the importance of truncated O-glycan-expressing MUC16 in this model. Further, immunohistochemistry staining of p-FAK in T3M4 WT, WT-MUC16KO, SC, and SC-MUC16KO cells implanted tumor tissues (as per the orthotopic tumor model described in [28]) revealed a significant downregulation in the expression of p-FAK in T3M4 WT- MUC16KO cells (p = 0.004) as well as T3M4 SC-MUC16KO cells (p = 0.0031) implanted groups as compared to WT and SC cells implanted tumors, respectively (Figure 2F,G). Altogether, these results support the hypothesis that aberrant expression of truncated O-glycans on MUC16 in PDAC cells enhances migratory properties of these cells via activation of FAK.
2.4. Aberrantly Glycosylated MUC16 Strongly Interacts with α4β1 Integrins
Several studies have established that activation of FAK is regulated by the receptor–ligand interactions between integrin complexes and extracellular matrix components on the cell surface [32,33]. Using the publicly available TCGA-PAAD dataset, the correlation between mRNA expression of MUC16 and β1 integrin (encoded by the ITGB1 gene) resulted in a positive Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.26 and Spearman correlation of 0.47 (Supplementary Figure S1D) [23]. The CPTAC proteomic dataset also revealed a significant upregulation in the expression of the β1 integrin in high-grade tumors, seemingly representing all stages of PDAC (Supplementary Figure S1E,F) [21]. Y397 phosphorylation of FAK, as observed in our study, has also been shown to be a downstream effect of integrin signaling [34]. In the microarray dataset [31] used to study FAK expression, the mRNA expression of the β1 integrin was also found to be significantly higher (p = 0.0006) in PDAC tumor tissues (n = 36) as compared to normal tissues (n = 16) (Figure 3A). We then analyzed the expression of ITGB1 in tumor subtypes stratified from the TCGA-PAAD cohort [23]. Elevated ITGB1 mRNA expression was observed in: (a.) Bailey’s classification-based Squamous subtype when compared to the ADEX (Aberrantly differentiated endocrine-exocrine), progenitor, and immunogenic subtypes (p < 0.001); (b.) Moffitt-classification-based basal-like subtype as compared to classical subtype (p < 0.001); and (c.) Collisson-classification-based quasi-mesenchymal subtype of PDAC as compared to the exocrine-like and classical subtypes (Figure 3B). This trend of ITGB1 gene expression mimics that of MUC16 mRNA expression in the three classifications of PDAC, as reported in a previous study [28]. It is important to note that the subtypes highlighted for high ITGB1 (and MUC16 as described in [28]) gene expression, namely the squamous (Bailey’s class), basal-like (Moffitt class), and quasimesenchymal (Collisson class) subtypes, are known to be associated with worsened survival and poor overall prognosis in PDAC patients [35]. We thus hypothesized that interactions between aberrant glycoforms of MUC16 and integrin complexes are responsible for activating FAK in truncated O-glycan-expressing PDAC cells. Co-immunoprecipitation studies of several integrins (α2, α4, α5, β1, β3, β4, and β5) with MUC16 in T3M4 WT and SC cells revealed that only α4 and β1 integrins demonstrate strong interactions with aberrant glycoforms of MUC16 in SC cells (Figure 3C). Studies with Capan-2 cells also showed strong interactions between MUC16 and α4β1 integrins in SC cells compared to WT (Figure 3D). To validate such an interaction, the proximity ligation assay (PLA) was employed, wherein the WT and SC cells were probed for MUC16, α4, and β1 integrins using target-specific antibodies. The PLA revealed a significantly higher interaction between MUC16:α4 integrin and MUC16:β1 integrin complexes in T3M4 SC cells than in WT cells (Figure 3E). Quantitative analysis (signals/dots per cell analyzed through blob finder software) of these interactions between MUC16 and α4 integrin (p = 0.0055) and β1 integrin (p = 0.0059) confirmed their higher proximity in SC cells as compared to the parental WT cells (Figure 3F). This data demonstrates that truncated O-glycan-containing MUC16 interacts with the α4 and β1 integrins and mediates their functional activation in PDAC.
2.5. Integrin α4β1–ILK–FAK Axis Is Upregulated in PDAC Cells with Truncated O-Glycan Containing MUC16
To further validate the role of FAK signaling and the possible mediators of this pathway in our model, we evaluated the expression of integrin-linked kinase (ILK)—a crucial positive modulator in the integrin-FAK axis [36]. We found that ILK was highly activated via increased phosphorylation (S343) in T3M4 and Capan-2 SC cells as compared to WT, while the loss of MUC16 caused a decrease in such phosphorylation (Figure 4A,B). To further confirm that integrins activate FAK signaling through ILK, we exposed T3M4 (WT and SC) cells to a selective small-molecule integrin inhibitor, BTT 3033, at a concentration of 100 nM for 24 h [37]. Treatment of cells with BTT 3033 resulted in the inhibition of phosphorylation of ILK at S343 in both T3M4 WT as well as SC cells (Figure 4C). Interestingly, a significant downregulation was observed in the phosphorylation of FAK in BTT 3033 treated T3M4 WT and SC cells (Figure 4C). This finding supports the hypothesis that integrins regulate the activation of FAK signaling through ILK. Overall, these results suggest that the interaction between MUC16 and α4β1 integrins increases the migratory ability of PDAC cells, and these interactions are positively regulated by aberrantly glycosylated structures frequently observed in this cancer.
2.6. Anti-MUC16 Antibody (AR9.6) Treatment Reduces Downstream Integrin-FAK Signaling
We have previously demonstrated that the MUC16-targeting AR9.6 antibody robustly inhibits MUC16 dependent signaling and reduces the tumor burden in orthotopic mouse models of PDAC [28]. To evaluate if such antibody-mediated MUC16 inhibition affects the cell migration and, more specifically, the integrin-FAK axis, T3M4, and Capan-2 (WT and SC) cells were treated with the AR9.6 antibody at concentrations of 5 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL for 24 h, as previously reported [28]. An isotype control murine IgG was used at 5 µg/mL under the same conditions. The wound-healing assay revealed a decrease in wound closure and cell migration in the AR9.6 antibody-treated groups compared to the untreated and isotype IgG treated controls in WT (Figure 5A) and SC cells (Figure 5C). Further, quantification of wound closure revealed a significant decrease in migration in T3M4 WT cells treated with 5 µg/mL AR9.6 (p = 0.006) and 10 µg/mL AR9.6 (p = 0.0018) (Figure 5B) and SC cells treated 5 µg/mL AR9.6 (p = 0.0067) and 10 µg/mL AR9.6 (p = 0.0075) (Figure 5D). The western blotting analysis confirmed the downregulation of Y397 FAK phosphorylation and S343 ILK phosphorylation upon AR9.6 treatment in T3M4 WT and SC cells (Figure 5E,F), as well as in Capan-2 WT and SC cells (Figure 5G,H). Thus, these results strongly demonstrate the importance of MUC16 and the truncated O-glycan structure on this mucin in mediating integrin-FAK-mediated cell migration in PDAC.
3. Discussion
The highest occurrence of aberrant glycosylation patterns has been observed in PDAC amongst the various solid tumors assessed [12]. This study was undertaken to understand the molecular mechanisms by which such aberrant glycosylation motifs in glycoproteins induce oncogenic features in PDAC cells. The role of MUC16 in promoting tumorigenicity has been widely demonstrated in ovarian and breast cancers, as has been recently extended to PDAC [38,39,40,41]. Herein, we employ CRISPR-Cas9 to genetically delete MUC16 in truncated O-glycan-expressing PDAC cells and demonstrate a dampening of tumorigenicity in these cells. A hallmark of PDAC pathogenesis, like most solid tumors, is the high potential for metastatic spread facilitated through complex coordination amongst diverse cellular processes, including cell migration and cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion-related pathways in the tumor niche [42]. Decreased tumor cell migration and invasion upon deletion of MUC16 in T3M4 WT and SC cells highlight the tumorigenic potential of MUC16 [28]. Moreover, the least migration and invasion rate in T3M4 SC-MUC16KO cells provides further impetus to the theory that aberrant glycosylation is an important player that enhances the ability of MUC16 to affect the tumorigenicity of PDAC cells [14,27].
To investigate the molecular events induced by aberrant glycosylation and thereby truncated O-glycan containing MUC16, we hypothesized that altered glycosylation of mucins influences their capacity to interact with integrins and cause the subsequent modulation of cell migration events that play a pivotal role in carcinogenesis. This study demonstrates that oncogenic interactions exist between aberrant glycoforms of MUC16 as seen in the SC cells and integrin α4β1 complexes, thereby unraveling a key and novel mechanism underlying the activation of FAK signaling to facilitate the increased migratory/invasive properties of PDAC cells.
Activation of intracellular kinases ILK/FAK has long been associated with the migration of cancer cells by promoting dynamic regulation of focal adhesions and peripheral actin structures [43]. Interactions between the extracellular matrix and integrin complexes and activation of ILK are known prerequisites for activation of FAK in multiple tumor models [44]. We found that aberrant expression of truncated O-glycans in SC cells tremendously upregulates the phosphorylation of ILK/FAK and exacerbates cancer progression. In this study, we provide the first experimental evidence that MUC16 can interact with α4/β1 integrins, and these interactions are significantly higher with aberrant glycoforms of MUC16. Our study shows that PDAC cell migration can partially be explained by increased interactions between aberrant glycoforms of MUC16 and the non-RGD-binding integrin α4/β1 complexes in PDAC tumors expressing truncated O-glycans. Using the AR9.6 monoclonal antibody to block MUC16 on these PDAC cells, the MUC16/integrin-mediated ILK and FAK activation was able to be suppressed, providing a therapeutic opportunity encompassing anti-MUC16 strategies (Figure 6).
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cell Lines and Culture
Isogenic PDAC cells (T3M4 and Capan-2) wild type (WT), COSMC Knockout SimpleCells (SC), and COSMC re-expression (SCR) were produced and maintained, as described previously [14].
4.2. Genetic Deletion of MUC16 in PDAC Cells
The N-terminal region of the MUC16 gene was genetically deleted in WT and SC PDAC cells (T3M4 and Capan-2) by using pre-made CRISPR/Cas9 KO plasmid kits, as described previously [28]. These MUC16 knockout cells (T3M4 WT-MUC16KO, T3M4 SC-MUC16KO, Capan-2 WT-MUC16KO, and Capan-2 SC-MUC16KO) were utilized for further experiments.
4.3. Wound-Healing Assay
T3M4 WT, T3M4 WT-MUC16KO, T3M4 SC, and T3M4 SC-MUC16KO cells were seeded onto six-well plates. After cells attained 80–90% confluency in a monolayer, the scratch/wound was created using a 200 µl pipet tip. Plates were washed with 1X PBS and replenished with a complete DMEM medium, following which the images for the 0 h time point were captured using bright-field microscopy. For antibody treatment conditions, control murine IgG (5 µg/mL) (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PN, USA) and murine AR9.6 (5 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL) (Quest PharmaTech Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada) were added to complete the media after the 0 h timepoint. The cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24 h, and images were recaptured at the same position as 0 h. The distance between the scratches was measured in µm and wound healing was calculated, as described previously [14].
4.4. Western Blotting
T3M4 and Capan-2 (WT, WT-MUC16KO, SC, SC-MUC16KO) whole cell lysates [RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL USA) with protease and proteinase inhibitor, 30 µg/lane] were resolved on 1.5% SDS-Agarose for the detection of MUC16, as described in [28], and 4–20% SDS-PAGE for all other markers, transferred to PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). For the integrin inhibitor treatment conditions, T3M4 and Capan-2 (WT and SC) cells were treated with BTT 3033 (Tocris Biosciences, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 100 nM for 24 h. For antibody treatment conditions, control murine IgG (5 µg/mL) (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Inc., PN, USA) and murine AR9.6 (5 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL) (Quest PharmaTech Inc., AB, Canada) were added to complete media and incubated as above for 24 h. Cells were lysed after the treatment period, and protein lysates were resolved on SDS-PAGE, as described above. The membranes were probed with the anti-MUC16 AR9.6 (Quest PharmaTech Inc., AB, Canada), anti-α-tubulin (Developmental studies hybridoma bank, IA, USA), anti-phospho-FAK (Y397), anti-FAK, anti-MMP-2, anti-MMP-9, anti-GAPDH, anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-phospho ILK (S343), and anti-ILK (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) antibodies. The membranes were then probed with the respective HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). The signal was detected using the ClarityTM Western ECL Chemiluminescent kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
4.5. Stratification of ITGB1 Expression in PDAC Subtypes
Clustering of TCGA PAAD dataset samples (n = 150) into subtypes was done, as described previously [35]. ITGB1 expression and stratification based on these PDAC subtypes was done and analyzed using the Mann–Whitney rank-sum test [28].
4.6. Immunoprecipitation Analysis
T3M4 and Capan-2 (WT and SC) cells were lysed in non-denaturing RIPA buffer (Thermo scientific, Lenexa, KS, USA) containing protease inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). A total of 500 µg of proteins were incubated with either mouse anti-MUC16 (5 µg/mL) or mouse IgG (5 µg/mL; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., PN, USA) overnight at 4 °C. Lysates were then incubated with protein G Sepharose beads (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. Beads were collected, washed three times with RIPA buffer without a protease inhibitor, and boiled in SDS loading buffer (1X). Samples were subjected to 4–20% gradient (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and transferred to the PVDF membrane. The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk and incubated with primary antibodies rabbit anti-integrin α4 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA, 1:1000) and rabbit anti- integrin β1 (Cell Signaling technology, Danvers, MA, USA, 1:1000) overnight. After incubating with the respective secondary antibodies, the protein–antibody complex was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Bio-Rad, CA, USA).
4.7. Proximity Ligation Assay
The protein–protein interaction experiments (growth factor receptors interactions with mucins and integrin complexes) were performed by using Duo Link II (Olink Bioscience, Watertown, MA, USA) Proximity Ligation Assay kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendation, as described previously [28]. Briefly, T3M4 WT and SC cells were grown on coverslips and then incubated with primary antibodies specific to MUC16 (AR9.6, Quest PharmaTech, Inc., AB, Canada), α4-integrin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and β1-integrin (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and then the primary antibodies were incubated with PLA probes anti-rabbit PLUS, anti-mouse MINUS. Experiments omitting the primary antibody used for single recognition PLA or either one of the primary antibodies used in double recognition PLA served as a negative control. The fluorescence images were captured under a Zeiss LSM 510 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY, USA) at Confocal Laser Scanning Fluorescence Microscopy Core Facility, UNMC. The signal/dots per cell were quantified by using blob finder software.
4.8. Immunohistochemistry
T3M4 WT, WT-MUC16KO, SC, and SC-MUC16KO cells orthotopically implanted tumor tissues from a previous study [28] were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded to prepare tissue slides. Slides were de-paraffinized using xylene, sequentially re-hydrated with alcohol (100%, 90%, 80%, 70%) and water, followed by hydrogen peroxide for quenching, and antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) for 10 min. They were blocked with Universal Blocker (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and incubated with primary antibodies, anti-phospho-FAK (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), at 4 °C overnight. After washing with 1X TBS, slides were incubated with the anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Agilent, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Post-washing, tissues were exposed to 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) substrate and counterstained with hematoxylin. It was followed by sequential dehydration with alcohol and cleared with xylene. Slides were mounted in mounting media with a coverslip. Histoscoring was done by a board-certified pathologist. Histoscore quantification was completed, as described previously [28].
4.9. Statistical Analysis
In vitro tumor cell migration was analyzed between T3M4 WT, WT-MUC16KO, T3M4 SC, and SC-MUC16KO cells by unpaired Student’s t test. The statistical significance in the protein expression between groups was analyzed by two-way ANOVA. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
5. Conclusions
In summary, our findings demonstrate that novel oncogenic interactions between aberrant glycoforms of MUC16 and integrin (α4 and β1) complexes enhance the migratory and pro-tumorigenic properties of PDAC cells via constitutive activation of FAK and its mediators. These findings can be used as a model to study and therapeutically target the truncated O-glycan-containing MUC16/integrin/ILK/FAK-signaling cascade to develop treatments against metastatic pancreatic cancer (Figure 6).
Acknowledgments
We thank Henrik Clausen (Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark) for providing COSMC knockout cells.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23105459/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.R.; data curation, X.L.P. and J.J.Y.; formal analysis, S.S., A.K.R., X.L.P. and J.J.Y.; funding acquisition, M.A.H. and P.R.; investigation, C.R., S.S., A.K.R. and D.T.C.; resources, M.A.H.; supervision, P.R.; validation, S.S. and A.K.R.; writing—original draft, C.R., D.T.C. and P.R.; writing—review and editing, C.R. and P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest
M.A.H and P.R have an equity interest in OncoCare Therapeutics that has licensing rights to AR9.6 antibody. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded in part by the NIH/NCI R01 CA208108, P01 CA217798, and Eppley Institute start-up fund.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Bast R.C., Jr., Klug T.L., St. John E., Jenison E., Niloff J.M., Lazarus H., Berkowitz R.S., Leavitt T., Griffiths C.T., Parker L., et al. A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;309:883–887. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198310133091503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Funston G., Hamilton W., Abel G., Crosbie E.J., Rous B., Walter F.M. The diagnostic performance of CA125 for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancer in primary care: A population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Remmers N., Anderson J.M., Linde E.M., DiMaio D.J., Lazenby A.J., Wandall H.H., Mandel U., Clausen H., Yu F., Hollingsworth M.A. Aberrant expression of mucin core proteins and O-linked glycans associated with progression of pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19:1981–1993. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haridas D., Chakraborty S., Ponnusamy M.P., Lakshmanan I., Rachagani S., Cruz E., Kumar S., Das S., Lele S.M., Anderson J.M., et al. Pathobiological implications of MUC16 expression in pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Felder M., Kapur A., Gonzalez-Bosquet J., Horibata S., Heintz J., Albrecht R., Fass L., Kaur J., Hu K., Shojaei H., et al. MUC16 (CA125): Tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress. Mol. Cancer. 2014;13:129. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cummings R.D., Pierce J.M. The challenge and promise of glycomics. Chem. Biol. 2014;21:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Magalhaes A., Duarte H.O., Reis C.A. Aberrant glycosylation in cancer: A novel molecular mechanism controlling metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:733–735. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pinho S.S., Reis C.A. Glycosylation in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:540–555. doi: 10.1038/nrc3982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hakomori S. Glycosylation defining cancer malignancy: New wine in an old bottle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:10231–10233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172380699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakagoe T., Sawai T., Tsuji T., Jibiki M., Nanashima A., Yamaguchi H., Yasutake T., Ayabe H., Arisawa K., Ishikawa H. Pre-operative serum levels of sialyl Tn antigen predict liver metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2001;27:731–739. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maeda K., Chung Y.S., Onoda N., Nakanihi I., Nitta A., Arimoto Y., Yamada N., Kondo Y., Kato Y., Sowa M. Serum sialyl-Tn antigen level as a prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 1994;4:129–132. doi: 10.3892/ijo.4.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Julien S., Videira P.A., Delannoy P. Sialyl-Tn in cancer: (How) did we miss the target? Biomolecules. 2012;2:435–466. doi: 10.3390/biom2040435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hofmann B.T., Schlüter L., Lange P., Mercanoglu B., Ewald F., Fölster A., Picksak A.-S., Harder S., El Gammal A.T., Grupp K., et al. COSMC knockdown mediated aberrant O-glycosylation promotes oncogenic properties in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2015;14:109. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0386-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Radhakrishnan P., Dabelsteen S., Madsen F.B., Francavilla C., Kopp K.L., Steentoft C., Vakhrushev S.Y., Olsen J.V., Hansen L., Bennett E.P., et al. Immature truncated O-glycophenotype of cancer directly induces oncogenic features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E4066–E4075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406619111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Steentoft C., Vakhrushev S.Y., Joshi H.J., Kong Y., Vester-Christensen M.B., Schjoldager K.T.-B.G., Lavrsen K., Dabelsteen S., Pedersen N.B., Marcos-Silva L., et al. Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through SimpleCell technology. EMBO J. 2013;32:1478–1488. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sieg D.J., Hauck C.R., Ilic D., Klingbeil C.K., Schaefer E., Damsky C.H., Schlaepfer D.D. FAK integrates growth-factor and integrin signals to promote cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:249–256. doi: 10.1038/35010517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sulzmaier F.J., Jean C., Schlaepfer D.D. FAK in cancer: Mechanistic findings and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14:598–610. doi: 10.1038/nrc3792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bianchi-Smiraglia A., Paesante S., Bakin A.V. Integrin β5 contributes to the tumorigenic potential of breast cancer cells through the Src-FAK and MEK-ERK signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2013;32:3049–3058. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lambert E., Fuselier E., Ramont L., Brassart B., Dukic S., Oudart J.-B., Dupont-Deshorgue A., Sellier C., Machado C., Dauchez M., et al. Conformation-dependent binding of a Tetrastatin peptide to αvβ3 integrin decreases melanoma progression through FAK/PI3K/Akt pathway inhibition. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:9837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28003-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kanteti R., Mirzapoiazova T., Riehm J.J., Dhanasingh I., Mambetsariev B., Wang J., Kulkarni P., Kaushik G., Seshacharyulu P., Ponnusamy M.P., et al. Focal adhesion kinase a potential therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2018;19:316. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1416937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen F., Chandrashekar D.S., Varambally S., Creighton C.J. Pan-cancer molecular subtypes revealed by mass-spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of more than 500 human cancers. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5679. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13528-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang H.-H., Liu J.-W., Lee J.-H., Harn H.-J., Chiou T.-W. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma therapeutics targeting RTK and TGF beta receptor. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:8125. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Raphael B.J., Hruban R.H., Aguirre A.J., Moffitt R.A., Yeh J.J., Stewart C., Robertson A.G., Cherniack A.D., Gupta M., Getz G., et al. Integrated genomic characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2017;32:185. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chandrashekar D.S., Bashel B., Balasubramanya S.A.H., Creighton C.J., Ponce-Rodriguez I., Chakravarthi B.V.S.K., Varambally S. UALCAN: A portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia. 2017;19:649–658. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oshi M., Tokumaru Y., Mukhopadhyay S., Yan L., Matsuyama R., Endo I., Takabe K. Annexin A1 expression is associated with Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), cell proliferation, prognosis, and drug response in pancreatic cancer. Cells. 2021;10:653. doi: 10.3390/cells10030653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ju T., Cummings R.D. A unique molecular chaperone Cosmc required for activity of the mammalian core 1 β3-galactosyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:16613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262438199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Thomas D., Sagar S., Caffrey T., Grandgenett P.M., Radhakrishnan P. Truncated O-glycans promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stemness properties of pancreatic cancer cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019;23:6885–6896. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thomas D., Sagar S., Liu X., Lee H.-R., Grunkemeyer J.A., Grandgenett P.M., Caffrey T., O’Connell K.A., Swanson B., Marcos-Silva L., et al. Isoforms of MUC16 activate oncogenic signaling through EGF receptors to enhance the progression of pancreatic cancer. Mol. Ther. 2021;29:1557–1571. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gobin E., Bagwell K., Wagner J., Mysona D., Sandirasegarane S., Smith N., Bai S., Sharma A., Schleifer R., She J.-X. A pan-cancer perspective of matrix metalloproteases (MMP) gene expression profile and their diagnostic/prognostic potential. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:581. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5768-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Furuyama K., Doi R., Mori T., Toyoda E., Ito D., Kami K., Koizumi M., Kida A., Kawaguchi Y., Fujimoto K. Clinical significance of focal adhesion kinase in resectable pancreatic cancer. World J. Surg. 2006;30:219–226. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0165-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pei H., Li L., Fridley B.L., Jenkins G.D., Kalari K.R., Lingle W., Petersen G., Lou Z., Wang L. FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating akt. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Richardson A., Parsons J.T. A mechanism for regulation of the adhesion-associated protein tyrosine kinase pp125FAK. Nature. 1996;380:538–540. doi: 10.1038/380538a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chang Y.-C., Su W., Cho E.-A., Zhang H., Huang Q., Philips M.R., Wu J. Molecular basis for autoinhibition of RIAM regulated by FAK in integrin activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:3524–3529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818880116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schaller M.D., Hildebrand J.D., Shannon J.D., Fox J.W., Vines R.R., Parsons J.T. Autophosphorylation of the focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK, directs SH2-dependent binding of pp60src. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994;14:1680–1688. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1680-1688.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Collisson E.A., Bailey P., Chang D.K., Biankin A.V. Molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16:207–220. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0109-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Oneyama C., Morii E., Okuzaki D., Takahashi Y., Ikeda J., Wakabayashi N., Akamatsu H., Tsujimoto M., Nishida T., Aozasa K., et al. MicroRNA-mediated upregulation of integrin-linked kinase promotes Src-induced tumor progression. Oncogene. 2012;31:1623–1635. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nissinen L., Koivunen J., Käpylä J., Salmela M., Nieminen J., Jokinen J., Sipilä K., Pihlavisto M., Pentikäinen O.T., Marjamäki A., et al. Novel α2β1 integrin inhibitors reveal that integrin binding to collagen under shear stress conditions does not require receptor preactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:44694–44702. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.309450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Davis H.M., Zurawski V.R., Bast R.C., Klug T.L. Characterization of the CA 125 antigen associated with human epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1986;46:6143–6148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lakshmanan I., Ponnusamy M.P., Das S., Chakraborty S., Haridas D., Mukhopadhyay P., Lele S.M., Batra S.K. MUC16 induced rapid G2/M transition via interactions with JAK2 for increased proliferation and anti-apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2012;31:805–817. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Muniyan S., Haridas D., Chugh S., Rachagani S., Lakshmanan I., Gupta S., Seshacharyulu P., Smith L.M., Ponnusamy M.P., Batra S.K. MUC16 contributes to the metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through focal adhesion mediated signaling mechanism. Genes Cancer. 2016;7:110–124. doi: 10.18632/genesandcancer.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Radhakrishnan P., Mohr A.M., Grandgenett P.M., Steele M.M., Batra S.K., Hollingsworth M.A. MicroRNA-200c modulates the expression of MUC4 and MUC16 by directly targeting their coding sequences in human pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lauffenburger D.A., Horwitz A.F. Cell migration: A physically integrated molecular process. Cell. 1996;84:359–369. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81280-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tai Y.-L., Chen L.-C., Shen T.-L. Emerging roles of focal adhesion kinase in cancer. BioMed Res. Int. 2015;2015:690690. doi: 10.1155/2015/690690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Seong J., Tajik A., Sun J., Guan J.-L., Humphries M.J., Craig S.E., Shekaran A., García A.J., Lu S., Lin M.Z., et al. Distinct biophysical mechanisms of focal adhesion kinase mechanoactivation by different extracellular matrix proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:19372–19377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307405110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.