Abstract
Homodimers are the most abundant type of enzyme in cells and as such, they represent the most elemental system for studying the phenomenon of allostery. In these systems, in which the allosteric features are manifest by the effect of the first binding event on the similar event at the second site, the most informative state is the asymmetric single bound (lig1) form, yet it tends to be elusive thermodynamically. Here we obtain milligram quantities of lig1 of the allosteric homodimer, chorismate mutase, in the form of a mixed isotopically labeled dimer stabilized by Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) between the subunits. Below, we outline several critical steps required to generate high yields of both types of unnatural amino acid-containing proteins, and overcome multiple pitfalls intrinsic to CuAAC to obtain high yields of highly purified, fully intact, active mixed labeled dimer, which provides the first glimpse of the lig1 intermediate. These data not only will make possible NMR-based investigations of allostery envisioned by us but should also facilitate other structural applications where specific linkage of proteins is helpful.
Introduction
Allostery is a remarkable phenomenon that is used ubiquitously in nature to achieve homeostasis. The motivation to understand allostery comes from a desire to untangle the native mechanisms of protein function, as well as the ultimate goal of designing allosteric proteins and allosteric drugs1–4. It is now clear that both structure and dynamics must be accounted for in order to describe allosteric transitions, and NMR is the single tool that is most ideally suited to provide both types of information5. Nature often uses oligomerization and symmetry in allosteric mechanisms, and because homodimers are the most common form of enzyme found in nature6, 7, we have chosen to study homodimeric systems by NMR to gain a deeper understanding of allostery. In the case of a symmetrical homodimer, where the allosteric feature is manifest by the effect of the first binding or catalytic event on the similar event on the second site, the most informative state is the asymmetric single bound (lig1) state. The “dream experiment” would be to bind ligand/substrate in one subunit while leaving the other subunit empty, and then observe how the binding of first ligand induces changes to either subunit, followed by similar observations corresponding to binding of the second ligand. Unfortunately, this most informative lig1 state is also the most elusive to capture in highly abundant and/or purified form, because, except for cases of extreme negative cooperativity, the lig1 state is disfavored8. To perform NMR studies on the lig1 state, we developed a mixed labeled dimer (MLD) approach in which isotopically labeled dimeric thymidylate synthase was mixed with unlabeled and binding incompetent dimer having a different charge, and the MLD was purified using ion exchange chromatography9. We were able to perform some NMR experiments on the MLD because the kinetics of dimer reapportionment in thymidylate synthase was slow. However, even in this favorable case, return to the equilibrium manifold of dimeric states occurred sufficiently fast to prevent conducting more time consuming and informative spin relaxation experiments. We therefore sought a method to selectively covalently link MLD subunits and trap them in the desired state.
We chose the homodimeric enzyme chorismate mutase (CM) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Figure 1) to explore the linked MLD approach because of its rich allosteric features and the fact that CM subunits exchange rapidly in the absence of linkage. CM is a classically allosteric protein that falls in the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids (Shikimate pathway), and it converts chorismic acid to prephenate10. Its activity is positively cooperative with respect to chorismate concentration (homotropic cooperativity), and the activity profile increases or decreases when bound to tryptophan or tyrosine, respectively (heterotropic cooperativity)11, 12. We weighed multiple approaches to covalently link CM subunits, either disulfide-based, or click chemistry together with unnatural amino acids (UAAs). Cystine disulfide bond linkage has the advantages of being reversible and not depending on UAA technology, but has limitations in that it is not biorthogonal and requires replacement of native Cys residues and/or omitting reducing agents. This can compromise function, and replacing Cys residues may prevent other NMR-based methods requiring thiol chemistry such as paramagnetic relaxation enhancement13. In addition, the short Cys side chain places severe constraints on the “reach” of linking groups. Similarly, usage of bromoalkyl-containing UAAs that react with cysteine are also subject to some of the drawbacks described above and the reaction efficiency is strongly dependent on pH, which may not be compatible with the stability of some proteins or protein complexes14. We chose the click-based approach, specifically the Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction, because it proceeds rapidly in a diverse set of solution conditions15, is biorthogonal16, and there is a diverse set of UAAs with different geometries that may satisfy different structural demands on linkage17. There are drawbacks to the CuAAC approach, however. CuAAC requires incorporation of two different UAAs, one with an azide and the other containing an alkyne. This is straightforward in principle using amber suppression and engineered tRNA synthetases18. In practice, nearly all CuAAC applications in biological systems are successful because they only require one protein containing a single UAA. In such cases, the other click partner is supplied as a small molecule that is either synthesized or commercially available and therefore can be supplied in high concentration. Most of the time, complete reactivity of the macromolecule is not required to achieve the desired outcome, which is true from the early seminal modification of viral capsids19 to modern proteomic applications20. In structural protein-protein interaction uses, such as the NMR approach described here, high yield of proteins with two different UAAs is required, as is homogeneity of clicked species; homogeneity is difficult because CuI-associated reaction oxygen species (ROS) often damage macromolecules during the reaction21.
Figure 1. CuAAC approach for generating chorismate mutase mixed labeled dimers (MLDs).

(A) General scheme for stable MLD generation in which Unlabeled AzF-containing protein is mixed with isotopically labeled PrK-containing protein, a CuI source is added, subunit exchange occurs, and the heterodimer is covalently linked by CuAAC if the subunits are close enough. Note that one subunit has an active site mutation (red “X”), which prevents substrate binding in one of the two subunits, thereby facilitating NMR or other structural biology investigation of the elusive singly-bound state. (B) The UAAs used to link CM in this work, 54AzF and 73PrK are shown. The Cβ to Cβ distance between these two amino acids is ~ 12 Å in CM x-ray models.
Herein, we overcome these barriers and produce 30 mg of a highly pure, linked, perdeuterated MLD using CuAAC from single liter growths of the two UAA-containing CM dimers. Each of the rudiments used to boost expression of UAA-containing proteins is at least mentioned in the literature, but we show that by carefully manipulating the aaRS plasmid type, the bacterial strain, and the timing and composition of the growth media in combination, one can routinely obtain large yields of protein with different UAA types. Expression is cost effective even for NMR, which requires expensive isotopic labeling, and is notoriously demanding of high concentration samples. By conducting CuAAC in an oxygen-free environment, we are able to make the click linkage reaction go to such efficiency, that little to no further purification is required, and the product maintains both the structure and activity of the native enzyme and provides a first glimpse of allosteric transmission in the CM lig1 state.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Optimizing expression of AzF and PrK-containing chorismate mutase.
Our strategy of using CuAAC to link the two subunits of the CM dimer requires incorporation of an azide-containing UAA in one subunit and an alkyne in the other (Figure 1). Candidate residues for linkage were chosen based on location, interprotomer distance, side-chain flexibility, and solvent accessible surface area (Table S1). UAA incorporation at a single site is achieved through amber codon suppression in concert with engineered tRNA synthetases22 with CM overexpression driven by the traditional T7 system in E. coli. Given the high mass requirements of NMR spectroscopy samples, optimizing expression yield is a critical element to the success of the approach. For this reason, we chose p-azidophenylalanine (pAzF) as the N3 contributor because the evolved aaRS that incorporates this UAA was shown to be as efficient as the native E. coli PheRS23, 24. Indeed, expression yields of CM containing pAzF at any one of multiple positions are in range of the wild type when expressed using the pULTRA25 plasmid tRNA/aaRS platform (Table 1.). In addition, we observed a significant increase in CM-pAzF protein yield when we used the arabinose inducible pEVOL platform26 for expression, presumably due to an increase in the cellular amount of the aaRS. Initially, the high yields lead us to believe that isotopically labeling the N3-containing subunit of the mixed labeled CM dimer would be most economical because the excellent yields of AzF-containing CM would offset the high cost of isotopes. For isotopically labeled applications, we used the approach described by Venditti and co-workers27, in which aaRS synthetase expression was pre-induced by arabinose in rich media prior to pelleting the cells and transferring into M9 minimal media supplemented with pAzF and the desired NMR isotopes; yields were outstanding on the order of 50 mg/L (Table 1).
Table 1.
Expression levels of Chorismate Mutase containing unnatural amino acids
| E. coli strain | aaRS platform | UAA positiona | UAA | Growth media | Yield/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL21*(DE3) | None | WT enzyme | None | M9H2O or D2O | 50–70 mg |
| BL21*(DE3) | pULTRA/pCNF-RS | 54, 73, 97, 137, 207,210 | AzF | LB or M9b | 20–50 mg |
| BL21*(DE3) | pEVOL/pAzF | 54, 73, 97, 137, 207, 210 | AzF | M9H2O,c | 50 mg |
| BL21*(DE3) | pULTRA/pylRS | 207 | PrK | LBb | 1 mg |
| BL21*(DE3) | pULTRA/pylRS | 207 | PrK | M9H2O,b | 1 mg |
| BL21*(DE3) | pEVOL/pylRS | 73, 137, 207 | PrK | M9H2O,c | 5–10 mg |
| B.95-ΔA | pEVOL/pylRS | 73, 97, 137, 207 | PrK | M9H2O,c | 5–10 mg |
| B.95-ΔA | pEVOL/pylRS | 73, 97, 137, 207 | PrK | M9H2O,d | 25–50 mg |
| B.95-ΔA | pEVOL/pylRS | 73 | PrK | M9D2O,d | 50 mg |
| B.95-ΔA | pEVOL/pylRS | 73 | PrK | M9+H2O,d | 200 mge |
UAA positions were always tested one a time.
1 mM AzF or PrK added prior to IPTG induction
Cells grown for two hours in LB + 0.02% arabinose prior to transfer into M9. 1 mM AzF or PrK added prior to IPTG induction.
Cells grown overnight in LB + 0.02% arabinose prior to transfer into M9 (or M9+). 10 mM PrK added prior to IPTG induction. Media composition in Supplemental Methods.
Based on yield from a 125 ml culture.
To generate the CuAAC alkyne reactant, we chose to incorporate propargyl-lysine (PrK) into CM due to its relatively low cost and the expected flexibility imparted by numerous bond rotational degrees of freedom. We viewed this plasticity as an advantage, both in terms of satisfying the geometric requirements of CuAAC reactant orientation between the two subunits, and minimizing strain-induced perturbation of the enzyme structural ensemble after linkage. The native pyrrolysine RS (pylRS) from Methanosarcina barkeri incorporates the PrK UAA into proteins28, 29. Obtaining the high yields of UAA-containing proteins for NMR using pylRS has proven difficult30, 31 and this was initially true for us. First we used pylRS in the pULTRA platform to express CM with PrK in place of native lysine 207. We obtained 1 mg of 207PrK from either one liter of LB or M9 minimal media (Table 1); this poor yield was accompanied by a large population of truncated product, presumably CM1–206 (Figure S1A). To test whether raising the amount of pylRS would increase yield, we subcloned two copies of the gene into the pEVOL UAA expression plasmid backbone26, one under the control of the constitutive proK promoter, and the other under the inducible araC promoter (the two aaRS copies is standard in pEVOL). To be sure that the yields were not idiosyncratic to the position of the UAA, we tried multiple substitutions throughout the enzyme (Table 1). Cultures were treated in the same way that gave high yields with the pEVOL-pAzF system above, and while protein yield increased five-fold to ~ 5 mg/L, the majority of the induced protein mass was truncated product (Table 1 and Figure S1B). Truncation at the amber codon is often seen in UAA protein expression, likely due to effective competition of release factor (RF1) with the charged amber tRNA32. We therefore utilized a strain (B.95-ΔA), which lacks RF1 to alleviate the truncation phenomenon, and replaces UAG codons in select genes with other stop triplets to maintain fitness33. Unfortunately, while there is no truncated product induced in this strain, yields are still on par with the classic BL21*(DE3) cells (Table 1 and Figure S1B), a result that is also independent of UAA position. It was previously shown that increasing the [PrK] in the expression media from 1 mM to 10 mM increases expression28. To go along with higher aaRS substrate, we hypothesized that extending the time of growth in rich media with arabinose from two hours to overnight would increase the concentration of the aaRS enzyme itself. These two changes, coupled with the B.95-ΔA strain, were all necessary to obtain yields between 25 and 50 mg/l, which is on par with the wild-type and AzF UAA enzymes (Table 1 and Figure S1C). This high yield was maintained when cells were grown in M9 with 99.8% D2O, which is critical for NMR studies of this 60 kDa enzyme (Table 1) and will enable CuAAC NMR applications to larger systems. Lastly, perdeuterated growths of PrK-containing enzymes can be quite costly owing to the D2O at $400/L and the UAA at $250/L. Clore and coworkers developed a minimal media, called M9+, in which both the levels of glucose and the buffering capacity are raised, allowing cells to grow to 10-fold higher density than canonical M934. We adapted our overnight pre-induction in LB-arabinose approach to M9+ (See Methods) and obtained 200 mg/L, which equates to a 4–8-fold cost savings on a per mg of expressed protein basis (Table 1). Each of the principles applied here were foreshadowed separately in the literature, but we show the importance of employing them in unison. For example, recently, Otting and co-workers created a library with a randomized amino acid binding pocket of the chimeric pylRS-based synthetase and selected RS variants that efficiently incorporated a different UAA, N6-(((Trimethylsilyl)methoxy)carbonyl)-L-lysine, and performed NMR studies on the material35. While they used a different plasmid to express the RS, the B.95-ΔA strain was critical for optimizing expression in their hands as well. In addition, Clore and co-workers introduced M9+ media as a way to save money on costly isotopes34, and we use it here in a case where isotope costs are compounded by the cost of the UAA. Collectively, the insights described above can be applied to NMR and other structural biology applications where cost effective production of UAA-containing proteins is a barrier.
Linkage of CM dimers with CuAAC.
The CuAAC reaction is notoriously difficult in air and aqueous solution due to the damaging effects of the ROS cascade on macromolecules. Thus, it was important for us to find conditions that are compatible with both efficient CuAAC linkage and maintenance of enzyme integrity post linkage. To test the two CM CuAAC linkage partners independently, we reacted either CM73PrK or CM54AzF with a 5 kDa PEGylated azide or alkyne, respectively (Figure S2A). We observed efficient CuAAC with CM73PrK and mPEG-Azide in air using CuSO4 as the copper source and ascorbic acid as the reductant (Figure S2B). Unfortunately, despite taking precautions to limit enzyme damage by ROS, including degassing the reagents, floating Argon on the reaction, using excess CuI ligand (BTTAA)36, and adding aminoguanidine to the reaction37, CM lost nearly half of its catalytic activity under these conditions (Figure S2C). To avoid the ROS-generating reducing agent, we moved to a Cu1 source in the form of [(CH3CN)4Cu]PF6, and while exposing CM to this reagent in air did not affect activity (Figure S2C), the CuAAC efficiency was severely impaired (Figure S2D), likely due to rapid loss of catalyst upon oxidation of CuI to CuII. We therefore moved to anaerobic conditions21, 38, 39 and performed the reaction using the CuI source, [(CH3CN)4Cu]PF6, in a glove box under N2 (See Methods). Under these conditions, we observed both efficient CuAAC reaction and preservation of enzyme activity (Figure S2C and S2D). It also became clear from these test reactions that the CM73PrK enzyme was reproducibly more reactive than CM54AzF, yielding CuAAC efficiencies of ~90% and ~60%, respectively (Figure S2E). We found that using the AzF-containing protein immediately after purification (within days of lysing cells) maximized the reactivity, but CMPrK was always more reactive than CMAzF, even after the PrK protein was more than a month old. We were careful not to expose CMAzF to reducing agent, and mass spectrometry confirmed that azide reduction by this mechanism was not the main culprit (Figure S3 and Supporting Methods). Nonetheless, the observation steered our MLD linkage strategy towards isotopically labelling the PrK subunit so any unlinked AzF-containing CM that we could not purify away from linked dimers would be silent in NMR experiments.
Enzymatic activity and NMR spectroscopy of linked CM.
To generate a MLD for NMR spectroscopy, we used unlabeled 54AzF and U-[2H,15N] 73PrK (natively Asn and Arg, respectively). The Cβ-Cβ distance between these two amino acids is ~10 Å in x-ray models (Figure 1B), which should be compatible with subunit linkage. Immediately prior to preparative scale CuAAC, we ran small scale PEG-reactions and found that 54AzF and U-[2H,15N] 73PrK were ~70% and ~90% reactive, respectively (Figure 2). In addition, a titration of the relative concentrations of linkage partners in CuAAC reactions showed that a 54AzF:73PrK ratio of 1.5:1 yielded maximal linked product (Figure 2). We note that product peaked after 30 minutes in the presence of CuI, indicating rapid mixing of CM subunits. The conclusion that subunit mixing-induced pre-organization greatly accelerates and is necessary for CuAAC under our conditions is supported by our observation that while CuAAC is successful on the dimer at 25 μM total protein concentration, one of the click partners needed to be at millimolar concentration in the bi-molecular PEG linkage reactions (Figure S2B). This feature is important if the technology is used to link partners in low affinity complexes as unwanted reactions between any unbound components are disfavored and increasing the local concentration upon binding ensures only properly arranged partners are linked.
Figure 2. CuAAC and enzymatic activity of linked CM.

(A) Demonstration of using CuAAC to link subunits of 54AzF and 73PrK CM. First four lanes show the reactivity of the individual subunits by using PEG click reagents, followed by small scale titration to establish the optimal ratio of the two subunits. The arrow shows the position of the linked product. The penultimate lane is a crude sample from a preparative 53 mg reaction, and the final lane shows modest purification after using His-tagged CM to fish out unlinked CM (see Methods). (B) Activity of unlinked wild-type CM in the left panel, and linked 54X73 CM in the right shows that linkage has no effect on activity of the apo enzyme, along with effects on the activity in the presence of Trp and Tyr effectors.
The preparative reaction contained 32 mg of 54AzF and 21 mg of 73PrK mixed in an anaerobic glovebox (see Methods) giving outstanding linkage efficiency (Figure 2A). Centrifugation of the product led to an enrichment of linked product due to selective precipitation of the unlinked azide (data not shown). We were alerted to the potential utility of this phenomenon by witnessing precipitation of CMAzF in the presence of CuI without its CuAAC PrK partner, while CMAzF remained clear in the presence of CuI, as long as there was excess alkyne. We obtained a yield of 33 mg product (62% of input mass), of which nearly all was linked (Figure 2A). This is close to theoretical maximum (66% of the total input mass) based on the 73PrK limiting reagent, consistent with the near complete reactivity of this linkage partner (Figure 2A). Finally, although NMR spectroscopy showed no evidence of detectible 15N unlinked 73PrK homodimer (see below), we were able to achieve additional purification by one of two methods: either by adding an excess of His-tagged CM to the linkage reaction, after which unlinked material dimerized with tagged subunits and bound to Ni2+ resin (Figure 2A), or by size exclusion chromatography in sub-denaturing urea if necessary (Figure S4). The linked material is a homogeneous dimer in solution; or in other words, there is no trans-dimerization as shown by indistinguishable SEC traces of concentrated linked and unlinked CM under native conditions (Figure S5). Lastly, the mixed dimer retains all the catalytic features of the wild-type unlinked enzyme. In the absence of effector, the kcat, Km, and Hill coefficients are indistinguishable (Figure 2B and Table 2). This is an important detail as it shows linkage does not perturb the classical homotropic allostery we intend to study with this linked MLD. The linked species is also activated by tryptophan and inhibited by tyrosine, though there are differences between linked and unlinked CM with respect to the degree of heterotropic allostery (Figure 2B and Table 2). This is not surprising given the location of the linkage in the effector binding domain (Figure 1B). We emphasize that this linkage site is ideal for probing homotropic allostery in the apo enzyme since all kinetic parameters are preserved in this form. While this same linkage may be sufficient to probe heterotropic allostery, MLDs will yield the greatest number of insights if linkage positions are available that do not interfere with the effectors and if conclusions based on one linkage are reproduced when other positions are studied. Table S2 outlines several alternative positions including many outside the effector binding domain, and Table 1 shows outstanding yields of these UAA containing enzymes.
Table 2.
Enzymatic activity of unlinked and linked CMa.
| Apo | Trp | Tyr | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Km (mM) | kcat (s−1) | Hill | Km (mM) | kcat (s−1) | Km (mM) | kcat (s−1) | Hill | |
| WT | 13 ± 1.9 | 410 ± 61 | 2.3 ± 0.34 | 1.4 ± 0.21 | 410 ± 20 | NFb | ||
| 54X73 | 12 ± 0.89 | 410 ± 29 | 2.3 ± 0.17 | 0.97 ± 0.18 | 260 ± 14 | 17 ± 7.3 | 103 ± 48 | 2.2 ± 0.63 |
V vs [S] plots in Figure 2.
Fit not reliable due to undefined Vmax.
Consistent with activity, NMR spectroscopy shows that neither exposure to copper, nor mutation, nor linkage itself significantly affects the structure of CM. In what follows, we denote the linked mixed labeled dimer between 54AzF and 73PrK as 54X73*, where the asterisk indicates that only the 73PrK subunit is perdeuterated and labeled with 15N. This approach of isotopic labeling, and therefore observing only one subunit at a time, is a prerequisite of our MLD approach for studying allosteric binding intermediates9, 40. First, we were able to concentrate 54X73* to 500 μM dimer and collect a TROSY 1H-15N HSQC spectrum, which is very similar to spectra of symmetrical 73PrK (Figure 3A) and wild-type (Figure 3B) homodimers. However, we observe less than 200 out of the possible 242 non-proline resonance in wild-type spectra, and these missing peaks largely map to the effector binding domain (EBD), which is the location of the 54 to 73 linkage (Figure S6). Thus, in principle, we could miss an effect of linkage on EBD structure because these peaks are missing. To test this possibility, we synthesized the CM transition state inhibitor (TSI)41, 42 (Figure S7), and added it and the tryptophan activator to wild-type or 54X73* CM and acquired HSQC spectra of this so-called “super-R” state10. Contrary to the apo, tryptophan, or tyrosine bound states, the super-R state gives rise to nearly all possible backbone resonances in HSQC spectra, and comparisons of these fingerprints show that neither mutation nor linkage significantly affects the structure of the EBD (Figure 3C and 3D). Lastly, our strategy of labeling the PrK-containing protomer of the MLD was predicated on the fact that this amino acid was consistently nearly 100% reacted in test CuAAC reactions (Figure 2A and S2E), thereby placing less stringency on the need to separate out linked material because the unreacted, unlabeled AzF partner would be undetectable. While our preparations of linked MLD are highly pure, we do see a small amount of unlinked material on Coomassie stained gels (Figure 2A). However, careful analysis of 54X73* HSQCs shows no intensity attributable to the 73* homodimer, suggesting the small amount of unlinked CM is silent in NMR experiments as per the design (Figure 3C, inset).
Figure 3. NMR spectroscopy of the 54X73* linked mixed labeled dimer.

Each panel depicts cartoons of the states compared spectroscopically. Filled subunits are U-[2H,15N] labelled. (A) Comparison of TROSY 1H-15N HSQCs of apo 54X73* with the 73PrK* homodimer. (B) Comparison of apo 54X73PrK* MLD with the free wild-type enzyme. Collectively panels A and B show that neither the mutations nor the linkage significantly affects the structure or dynamics of CM. (C) Comparison of 54X73* and 73PrK* bound to transition state analog and tryptophan. The inset in panel C shows that there is no detectable unlinked 73PrK* homodimer in our linked MLD preparation as this contaminant would manifest as orange intensity overlaying with the central black resonance. (D) Comparison of the WT and 54X73* MLD bound spectra. Note that the MLD is not “back exchanged” (2H to 1H of highly protected amides), which explains the ~10 black resonances without an orange counterpart (highlighted with arrows).
A MLD reveals information about the CM lig1 state.
The MLD approach of studying the lig1 state one subunit at a time requires mutational knockout of a single active site (Figure 1). This was accomplished by two mutations, R16L and T242G, which are sufficient to render CM activity undetectable (Figure S8). More importantly for our NMR-based experimental design, the 73PrK, R16L, T242G triple mutant does not bind the TSI based on perfectly superposable NMR spectra of the enzyme with and without the small molecule (Figure 4A). We made and purified a MLD with unlabeled 54AzF linked to U-[2H,15N] 73PrK, R16L, T242G as described above. This MLD is therefore designed to interrogate the empty subunit of the lig1 state. The spectrum of the apo CuAAC-linked MLD overlays well with the labeled homodimeric starting material (Figure 4B). However, when TSI, which only binds the unlabeled subunit, is added to generate the pure lig1 form, we observe multiple changes to the NMR spectrum ranging from peak shifts, new peaks, and doubled peaks (Figure 4C). The spectrum did not change with time (7 days), or the addition of TSI, which was already present under saturating conditions. We therefore conclude that these spectral changes represent bona fide allosteric communication of the first binding event to the empty subunit. Interestingly, the doubled resonances cluster to helices 9 and 10, which are adjacent to the empty active site and at 65 Å away, they represent the furthest structural elements from the bound TSI (Figure 4D). Efforts are now underway to determine the structural and dynamic origins of these spectral changes, to study the bound subunit of lig1, and to extend the probes to Ile, Leu and Val methyl groups as these resonances in the effector binding domain are visible43, 44. In summary, the biorthogonal specific crosslinking described in this work will be useful in elucidating allosteric mechanisms in allosteric dimeric and higher order oligomer systems but can clearly have a wide range of additional applications. It is our expectation that the ability to obtain high yields of intact and homogeneously cross-linked protein will also enable structural and dynamic insights into the function of otherwise intractable systems such as transient protein-protein interactions14 and large molecular assemblies45.
Figure 4. NMR spectroscopy of a lig0 and lig1 MLD with a single active site knockout.

(A) The R16L, T242G active site double mutant does not bind TSI in the context of the 73PrK UAA enzyme. (B) The 54AzFx73PrK, R16L, T242G lig0 MLD in which only the PrK-containing subunit is isotopically labeled, is similar to the fully labeled, symmetrical starting material. (C) Binding of a single TSI molecule to the unlabeled subunit results in spectral changes in the unbound subunit. (D) Clustering of spectral changes observed in panel C to α9, and α10 in the empty subunit in lig1.
Methods
Expression and purification of CM.
TEV cleavable His-tagged wild-type CM in pET21a was transformed into BL21*(DE3) cells, grown to OD600 ≅ 0.8 in various liquid media types at 37 °C, IPTG was added to 0.75 mM, and induced for 4 hours. Cells were collected in Ni2+ A buffer (20 mM NaPO4, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM BME 0.02% NaN3, pH 7.4), 10 mg hen egg white lysozyme was added, and cells were frozen at −20°C until further use. Cells were lysed using sonication, and the cleared supernatant was applied to a 5 ml Ni2+ column (Genesee or Cytivia) and eluted with a 15 column volume gradient from 0–100% Ni2+ B buffer (Buffer A plus 250 mM imidazole). CM-containing fractions were pooled, roughly 0.3 mg of TEV protease was added, and the cleavage was allowed to proceed overnight while dialyzing against Buffer A at room temperature. Cleaved CM was added to a Ni2+ column, the flow through was collected, concentrated, and then applied to an S200 size exclusion chromatography column equilibrated with NMR buffer (25 mM NaPO4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.01% NaN3, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5).
For growths involving UAAs, the CM plasmid above containing an amber mutation was co-transformed with an aaRS/tRNA plasmid (either pULTRA or pEVOL) into BL21*(DE3) or B.95-ΔA cells. The pULTRA-pCNFRS and pULTRA-pylRS plasmids were a gift from Dr. Erik Brustad. The pEVOL-pAzF plasmid was from Addgene (plasmid #31186), and the pEVOL-pylRS plasmid was constructed by Gibson assembly using the aforementioned pULTRA plasmid as the source of the RS and tRNA coding DNAs. Growths using the pULTRA platform proceeded similarly to the wild type because the aaRS is under the control of a constitutive promotor in this system. To express AzF-containing CM in the pEVOL system, a 150 ml culture of LB was inoculated with 5 ml of an overnight culture, and grown at 37 °C. When the cells reached an OD600 of 0.4, arabinose was added to 0.02%, and the cells were grown for an additional two hours prior to collection by centrifugation at 170xg for one hour. These cells were then added to one liter of M9 minimal media such that the OD was 0.4 (cells from the entire 150 ml overnight culture were not always necessary to reach 0.4), arabinose was added to 0.02% and AzF (Chem-Impex) was added to 1 mM, and the cells were allowed to grow until the OD reached 0.8, at which time IPTG was added and induction proceeded for four hours as described above. Expression of PrK (SiChem)-containing CM in minimal media was conducted similarly except the initial 150 ml grown in LB-0.02% arabinose proceeded overnight rather than two hours, the unnatural amino acid was added to a [final] of 10 mM rather than 1 mM, and induction time was extended to 12 hours. Expression in 99.8% D2O proceeded similarly with the following modifications: the M9 media was supplemented with 1 g/L 2H, 15N celtone powder (Cambridge Isotope Labs), and 1X MEM Vitamins (Fisher). In addition, cells grown in LB-arabinose were washed twice with M9 salts in D2O to remove as much rich media as possible prior to transfer into 99.8% M9. Lastly, as a cost saving measure, we demonstrated the ability to get high yield of UAA proteins in a higher cell density, lower culture volume media called M9+. The composition of M9+ was as described by Clore34 and as is the case with UAA growths in classic M9 above, we generated the majority of the cell mass in LB-arabinose prior to transfer into M9+ to avoid suppression of transcription from the pBAD promoter by glucose. Cells were washed with M9 salts, added to M9+ such that the OD was 4.0, arabinose and the appropriate UAA were added, and cells were grown to an OD of 8.0 prior to induction. Collection and purification of UAA containing CM was as above with the wild type, except reducing agent was omitted from all steps involving AzF protein to avoid reducing the azide, and NaN3 and reducing agent was omitted from all final buffers so as not to interfere with downstream CuAAC applications.
CuAAC.
All CuACC reactions were conducted in 25 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, without reducing agent. Control reactions were conducted with either mPEG-azide (MW 5k) or mPEG alkyne-alkyne (MW 5k) from Creative PEG Works. PEG CuAAC reactions with CuSO4 contained 10 μM CMAzF or CMPrK dimers, 5 mM aminoguanidine, 5 mM PEG reagent, premixed 0.5 mM CuSO4 plus 2.5 mM BTTAA, and 5 mM ascorbic acid, added in that order. Alternatively, reactions with CuI, substituted [(CH3CN)4Cu]PF6 for CuSO4 and omitted the ascorbic acid. [(CH3CN)4Cu]PF6 was prepared in acetonitrile, mixed with BTTAA prepared in water, lyophilized, and then re-suspended in degassed buffer in air or in a glovebox. A titration showed the concentration of the PEG reagents for optimal linkage was 5 mM (Figure S2B). Reactions were performed either in air or in a glovebox (Cleatech) under N2, and were allowed to proceed for 30 minutes prior to adding EDTA to 10 mM. Intra dimer CM linkage reactions used 2-fold lower copper:BTTA (0.25:1.25 mM) and both protein dimers (AzF and PrK CuAAC partners) were on the order of 10 uM. The preparative mixed labeled dimer reaction was 35 ml in which the 54AzF and 73PrK concentrations were 15 and 10 μM dimer respectively. EDTA (10 mM) was added to the reaction in the glovebox and to remove the copper-EDTA chelate, the material was immediately buffer exchanged into NMR buffer.
Separation of linked MLD from unlinked CM.
To clean up the MLD sample, we added 10-fold excess His-tagged CM to our crude MLD preparation, and allowed it to mix for one hour at room temperature in Ni-buffer A. The scale of this separation was 15 mg MLD, of which, we estimated 10% unlinked, therefore 15 mg of His-CM was added. The mixture was then applied to a 5-ml Ni2+ column (Cytivia), and the enriched MLD, which lacked a His tag, was in the flow through (Figure 2A), while unlinked subunits paired with His-tagged subunits and adsorbed to the column. We explored an alternative purification method of adding 4 M urea to the crude MLD, and running it over an S200 size exclusion column equilibrated with NMR buffer plus 4M urea. This was also effective (Figure S4), but urea exposure resulted in ~25% loss of the material.
CM Activity Assay.
The substrate, chorismic acid (CA) from Sigma was suspended in D2O, and its concentration was determined by the NMR-based PULCON experiment46. CA was then lyophilized and re-suspended in NMR buffer, and base was added to ensure accurate and constant pH in experiments with different CA concentrations. Conversion of CA to prephrenate is accompanied by maximal absorbance change at 274 nm (Figure S9A). However, high concentrations of CA in Michaelis-Menten type analysis will result in A274 beyond the linear range of our Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. To get around this, we measured kinetics at a non-maximal wavelength. In other words, we targeted the shoulder and measured kinetics at 310 nm. To ensure this is justified, we measured the extinction coefficient for the substrate to product conversion at a range of wavelengths, and found that the extinction coefficients were precisely determined and constant over a range of substrate concentrations (Figure S9).
To monitor CM activity during simulated CuAAC conditions, we exposed the wild-type enzyme to the reaction conditions described in methods above, an aliquot was removed at the specified time, EDTA was added to 5 mM, the aliquot was centrifuged, and activity was measured in NMR buffer under the following conditions: 40 nM CM, 1 mM CA, and 10 μM Trptophan. A310 was monitored for one minute, and the initial velocities were determined from the first 100 ms. V/Vo was then plotted as a function of time, where V is the initial velocity at time t after addition of copper, and Vo is the initial velocity in the absence of copper.
Michaelis-Menten analysis was performed on the 54X73* MLD and compared with the wildtype. All assays were performed in NMR buffer at 22 °C and velocities were measured at 310 nm as described above. Due to the dramatically different velocities in the absence and presence of effector molecules, we modulated the enzyme concentration to bring the kinetics into a favorable window for measurement. The apo enzyme was at 4 × 10−7 M, the Trp-bound enzyme was at 1.5 × 10−8 M CM and 40 μM Trp, and the Tyr-bound enzyme was at 8 × 10−7 M CM and 100 μM Tyr. Velocities were normalized in terms of [enzyme] and plotted as μmol product per min per mg CM in Figure 2B. Data were fit to the classic Michaelis-Menton equation when curves were hyperbolic, and a Hill coefficient was added to the model when curves were sigmoidal (Table 2). Confidence intervals in the fitted parameters were computed from the residuals and the Jacobian matrix using the ‘nlparci’ function in Matlab.
Synthesis of the CM Transition-State Analog.
Synthesis of the Na-salt of the CM transition state inhibitor was carried out as described41, 42. Our preparation contained a mixture of the exo and the endo forms of the oxabicyclic diacid (exo:endo ratio 2.6:1, determined by 1H NMR), but CM from another species preferentially binds the endo form by nearly three orders of magnitude47. Indeed, a pure preparation of the exo isomer does not cause peak shifts in HSQCs of either apo or Trp-bound yeast CM (Figure S10). Therefore, spectra presented in Figures 3 and 4 represent the enzyme bound to the endo inhibitor.
NMR Spectroscopy.
To assign the backbones of the apo and Trp-bound states, 500 μM (dimer) samples of U-[2H, 13C, 15N] CM without and with 7.4 mM L-tryptophan were prepared in NMR buffer plus 5% D2O. Approximately 20 amides did not exchange with H2O protons during purification. To back exchange these amides, 5 μM enzyme was incubated in back exchange buffer (2M urea, 40 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM BME, 0.01% NaN3, pH 9) for 24 hours at 22 °C. Urea was then removed with dialysis against the same buffer minus urea, then buffer exchanged into NMR buffer using a G25 column. Resonance assignments were made using standard TROSY triple resonance experiments and the Runabout module within NMRFx48 as we described previously for a similarly sized dimer49. For investigations of the MLD, 500 μM (dimer) U-[2H, 15N] WT or 54X73* samples were prepared in NMR buffer supplemented with 5% by volume D2O. TROSY-HSQC spectra of either were acquired at 25 °C on an 600 MHz Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a TCI 5 mm cryoprobe using the trosyf3gpphsi19.2 Bruker pulse program with 16 scans per fid, a recycle delay of one second, and (1200, 110) complex points corresponding to (100 ms, 64 ms) acquisition times in t2 and t1, respectively. Tryptophan was added to 7.4 mM and two molar equivalents of the transition state inhibitor were added prior to acquisition of HSQC spectra of the super-R state using the same parameters as above. The lig0 and lig1 HSQC spectra of the MLD dimer in Figure 4 were collected on a 200 μM dimer without and with 2 molar equivalents of TSI relative to subunits respectively.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank E. Brustad for providing the pULTRA-pCNFRS and pULTRA-pylRS plasmids and early useful discussions of crosslinking strategies. The B.95-ΔA strain was acquired from the DNA Bank, RIKEN BioResource Center, deposited by K. Sakamoto.
Funding Sources
This work was funded by NIH grants GM127698 and GM083059 to A.L.L. The UNC School of Medicine Biomolecular NMR Lab is supported in part by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA016086 to the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. E.W.C, D.G and M.B.M were funded by the NIH/NCI grant R01CA216051.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: This material is available free of charge via the Internet.
References
- 1.Pirro F; Schmidt N; Lincoff J; Widel ZX; Polizzi NF; Liu L; Therien MJ; Grabe M; Chino M; Lombardi A; DeGrado WF, Allosteric cooperation in a de novo-designed two-domain protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020, 117 (52), 33246–33253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Slosky LM; Caron MG; Barak LS, Biased Allosteric Modulators: New Frontiers in GPCR Drug Discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2021, 42 (4), 283–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Manning JJ; Green HM; Glass M; Finlay DB, Pharmacological Selection of Cannabinoid Receptor Effectors: Signalling, Allosteric Modulation and Bias. Neuropharmacology 2021, 108611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fleishman SJ; Horovitz A, Extending the New Generation of Structure Predictors to Account for Dynamics and Allostery. J Mol Biol 2021, 167007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bax A; Clore GM, Protein NMR: Boundless opportunities. J Magn Reson 2019, 306, 187–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matthews JM; Sunde M, Dimers, oligomers, everywhere. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012, 747, 1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goodsell DS; Olson AJ, Structural symmetry and protein function. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000, 29, 105–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Popovych N; Sun S; Ebright RH; Kalodimos CG, Dynamically driven protein allostery. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006, 13 (9), 831–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Falk BT; Sapienza PJ; Lee AL, Chemical shift imprint of intersubunit communication in a symmetric homodimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016, 113 (34), 9533–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Strater N; Schnappauf G; Braus G; Lipscomb WN, Mechanisms of catalysis and allosteric regulation of yeast chorismate mutase from crystal structures. Structure 1997, 5 (11), 1437–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schnappauf G; Lipscomb WN; Braus GH, Separation of inhibition and activation of the allosteric yeast chorismate mutase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95 (6), 2868–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schmidheini T; Mosch HU; Evans JN; Braus G, Yeast allosteric chorismate mutase is locked in the activated state by a single amino acid substitution. Biochemistry 1990, 29 (15), 3660–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clore GM, Practical Aspects of Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement in Biological Macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 2015, 564, 485–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cigler M; Muller TG; Horn-Ghetko D; von Wrisberg MK; Fottner M; Goody RS; Itzen A; Muller MP; Lang K, Proximity-Triggered Covalent Stabilization of Low-Affinity Protein Complexes In Vitro and In Vivo. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2017, 56 (49), 15737–15741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim E; Koo H, Biomedical applications of copper-free click chemistry: in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo. Chem Sci 2019, 10 (34), 7835–7851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rostovtsev VV; Green LG; Fokin VV; Sharpless KB, A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002, 41 (14), 2596–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lang K; Chin JW, Cellular incorporation of unnatural amino acids and bioorthogonal labeling of proteins. Chem Rev 2014, 114 (9), 4764–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang L; Schultz PG, Expanding the genetic code. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2004, 44 (1), 34–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang Q; Chan TR; Hilgraf R; Fokin VV; Sharpless KB; Finn MG, Bioconjugation by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3 + 2] cycloaddition. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125 (11), 3192–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parker CG; Pratt MR, Click Chemistry in Proteomic Investigations. Cell 2020, 180 (4), 605–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li S; Cai H; He J; Chen H; Lam S; Cai T; Zhu Z; Bark SJ; Cai C, Extent of the Oxidative Side Reactions to Peptides and Proteins During the CuAAC Reaction. Bioconjug Chem 2016, 27 (10), 2315–2322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu CC; Schultz PG, Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annu Rev Biochem 2010, 79, 413–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Young DD; Young TS; Jahnz M; Ahmad I; Spraggon G; Schultz PG, An evolved aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with atypical polysubstrate specificity. Biochemistry 2011, 50 (11), 1894–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chin JW; Martin AB; King DS; Wang L; Schultz PG, Addition of a photocrosslinking amino acid to the genetic code of Escherichiacoli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99 (17), 11020–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chatterjee A; Sun SB; Furman JL; Xiao H; Schultz PG, A versatile platform for single- and multiple-unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 2013, 52 (10), 1828–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Young TS; Ahmad I; Yin JA; Schultz PG, An enhanced system for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in E. coli. J Mol Biol 2010, 395 (2), 361–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Venditti V; Fawzi NL; Clore GM, An efficient protocol for incorporation of an unnatural amino acid in perdeuterated recombinant proteins using glucose-based media. J Biomol NMR 2012, 52 (3), 191–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nguyen DP; Lusic H; Neumann H; Kapadnis PB; Deiters A; Chin JW, Genetic encoding and labeling of aliphatic azides and alkynes in recombinant proteins via a pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase/tRNA(CUA) pair and click chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131 (25), 8720–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wan W; Tharp JM; Liu WR, Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase: an ordinary enzyme but an outstanding genetic code expansion tool. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014, 1844 (6), 1059–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang F; Zhou Q; Yang G; An L; Li F; Wang J, A genetically encoded (19)F NMR probe for lysine acetylation. Chem Commun (Camb) 2018, 54 (31), 3879–3882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang YS; Fang X; Chen HY; Wu B; Wang ZU; Hilty C; Liu WR, Genetic incorporation of twelve meta-substituted phenylalanine derivatives using a single pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase mutant. ACS Chem Biol 2013, 8 (2), 405–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang K; Neumann H; Peak-Chew SY; Chin JW, Evolved orthogonal ribosomes enhance the efficiency of synthetic genetic code expansion. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25 (7), 770–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mukai T; Hoshi H; Ohtake K; Takahashi M; Yamaguchi A; Hayashi A; Yokoyama S; Sakamoto K, Highly reproductive Escherichia coli cells with no specific assignment to the UAG codon. Sci Rep 2015, 5, 9699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cai M; Huang Y; Yang R; Craigie R; Clore GM, A simple and robust protocol for high-yield expression of perdeuterated proteins in Escherichia coli grown in shaker flasks. J Biomol NMR 2016, 66 (2), 85–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abdelkader EH; Qianzhu H; Tan YJ; Adams LA; Huber T; Otting G, Genetic Encoding of N(6)-(((Trimethylsilyl)methoxy)carbonyl)-l-lysine for NMR Studies of Protein-Protein and Protein-Ligand Interactions. J Am Chem Soc 2021, 143 (2), 1133–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Besanceney-Webler C; Jiang H; Zheng T; Feng L; Soriano del Amo D; Wang W; Klivansky LM; Marlow FL; Liu Y; Wu P, Increasing the efficacy of bioorthogonal click reactions for bioconjugation: a comparative study. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2011, 50 (35), 8051–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hong V; Presolski SI; Ma C; Finn MG, Analysis and optimization of copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition for bioconjugation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2009, 48 (52), 9879–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kumar A; Li K; Cai C, Anaerobic conditions to reduce oxidation of proteins and to accelerate the copper-catalyzed “Click” reaction with a water-soluble bis(triazole) ligand. Chem Commun (Camb) 2011, 47 (11), 3186–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Loh CT; Ozawa K; Tuck KL; Barlow N; Huber T; Otting G; Graham B, Lanthanide tags for site-specific ligation to an unnatural amino acid and generation of pseudocontact shifts in proteins. Bioconjug Chem 2013, 24 (2), 260–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee AL; Sapienza PJ, Thermodynamic and NMR Assessment of Ligand Cooperativity and Intersubunit Communication in Symmetric Dimers: Application to Thymidylate Synthase. Front Mol Biosci 2018, 5, 47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Smith WW; Bartlett PA, An Improved Synthesis of the Transition-State Analog Inhibitor of Chorismate Mutase. J Org Chem 1993, 58 (25), 7308–7309. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bartlett PA; Nakagawa Y; Johnson CR; Reich SH; Luis A, Chorismate Mutase Inhibitors - Synthesis and Evaluation of Some Potential Transition-State Analogs. J Org Chem 1988, 53 (14), 3195–3210. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gorman SD; Winston DS; Sahu D; Boehr DD, Different Solvent and Conformational Entropy Contributions to the Allosteric Activation and Inhibition Mechanisms of Yeast Chorismate Mutase. Biochemistry 2020, 59 (27), 2528–2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gorman SD; Boehr DD, Energy and Enzyme Activity Landscapes of Yeast Chorismate Mutase at Cellular Concentrations of Allosteric Effectors. Biochemistry 2019, 58 (39), 4058–4069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fauser J; Itzen A; Gulen B, Current Advances in Covalent Stabilization of Macromolecular Complexes for Structural Biology. Bioconjug Chem 2021, 32 (5), 879–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wider G; Dreier L, Measuring protein concentrations by NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128 (8), 2571–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bartlett PA; Johnson CR, An Inhibitor of Chorismate Mutase Resembling the Transition-State Conformation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1985, 107 (25), 7792–7793. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Norris M; Fetler B; Marchant J; Johnson BA, NMRFx Processor: a cross-platform NMR data processing program. J Biomol NMR 2016, 65 (3–4), 205–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sapienza PJ; Lee AL, Backbone and ILV methyl resonance assignments of E. coli thymidylate synthase bound to cofactor and a nucleotide analogue. Biomol NMR Assign 2014, 8 (1), 195–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
