Abstract
Targeting cancer stem cell metabolism has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. Breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) exert distinct metabolism machinery, which plays a major role in radiation and multidrug resistance. Therefore, exploring the mechanisms involved in energy utilization of BCSCs could improve the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies aimed at their elimination. This study was conducted to clarify the glucose metabolism machinery and the function of nootkatone, a bioactive component of grapefruit, in regulating glucose metabolism and stemness characteristics in human breast carcinoma MCF-7 stem cells (MCF-7SCs). In vivo experiments, transcriptomic analysis, seahorse XF analysis, MTT assay, Western blotting, mammosphere formation, wound healing, invasion assay, flow cytometric analysis, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and in silico docking experiments were performed. MCF-7SCs showed a greater tumorigenic capacity and distinct gene profile with enrichment of the genes involved in stemness and glycolysis signaling pathways compared to parental MCF-7 cells, indicating that MCF-7SCs use glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for their energy supply. Nootkatone impaired glucose metabolism through AMPK activation and reduced the stemness characteristics of MCF-7SCs. In silico docking analysis demonstrated that nootkatone efficiently bound to the active site of AMPK. Therefore, this study indicates that regulation of glucose metabolism through AMPK activation could be an attractive target for BCSCs.
Keywords: breast cancer stem cells, glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, cancer metabolism, nootkatone, AMPK
1. Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, accounting for nearly 11.7% of new cancer cases in 2020; its incidence is projected to increase by more than 46% by 2040 [1]. Many treatment strategies have been established for breast cancer, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy. However, these conventional treatments have limitations due to resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, recurrence, metastasis, and weak immunological surveillance. The main cause of breast cancer treatment failure can be attributed to cancer stem cells (CSCs) [2]. Therefore, eliminating the CSC population is considered a potential approach to improve the effectiveness of current therapeutic strategies. In this study, we utilized MCF-7SCs as a model for examining the characteristics of breast cancer stem cells and looking for novel therapeutics that can target breast cancer stem cells. In a previous study, we revealed that MCF-7SCs were the small population (4.39%) that were sorted from MCF-7 cells using the CD44+ and CD24− marker. In comparison to its parental cells MCF-7, MCF-7SCs exert enrichment of stemness characteristics, as evidenced by the enhancement of the CD44+/CD24− population, higher ALDH level, increased mammosphere formation capacity, reduced ROS levels, overexpressed drug efflux proteins (MDR1 and MRP1), and enhanced migration and invasion capabilities [3,4].
One hallmark of cancer cells is their ability to proliferate rapidly. Cellular metabolic processes are adept to support high rates of proliferation [5]. Cancer cells are largely dependent on “aerobic glycolysis” rather than oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for energy production, regardless of oxygen availability; this is known as the Warburg effect [6]. However, the ability of different types of CSCs to meet their energy needs via glycolysis or OXPHOS varies [7]. Although stem cells primarily use glycolysis rather than OXPHOS for energy production [8,9], in pancreatic and ovarian CSCs, energy is produced by mitochondrial oxidative metabolism [7]. As such, the overall data on CSC metabolism are inconsistent and contradictory. Further exploration of the mechanisms of energy use of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) is needed for the development of new breast cancer therapeutics [10,11].
One of the most well-known glucose metabolism regulators is the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which is a highly conserved serine/threonine protein kinase that consists of a catalytic α-subunit, scaffolding β-subunit, and regulatory γ-subunit [12]. Phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK) induces mTOR inhibition by activating the TSC1/2 complex, which regulates cell metabolism, survival, and development [13]. AMPK activation interferes with the growth of cancer cells and tumors by inhibiting MAPK, PI3K-AKT, and mTOR signaling [14,15,16]. However, the role of AMPK in metabolic control of BCSCs has yet to be determined. Nootkatone is a natural chemical produced in grapefruit that reduces diet-induced obesity and stimulates energy metabolism by activating AMPK [17,18]. Nootkatone may also act as an anticancer agent in lung and colorectal tumors [19,20]. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that regulation of glucose metabolism by AMPK activation could be the mechanism underlying the effect of nootkatone on BCSCs. We report for the first time that nootkatone regulates glucose metabolism and suppresses the stemness characteristics of BCSCs.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Culture
Human MCF-7 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). The BCSC cell line MCF-7SC was sorted from MCF-7 cells using the CD44+ and CD24− markers and characterized as described previously [3,4]. MCF-7 cells and MCF-7SCs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium, respectively, supplemented with 10% heat-activated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were sub-cultured upon reaching 70–80% confluence.
2.2. Tumor Xenograft Experiments
Six-week-old athymic BALB/c male nude mice (n = 4/group) were maintained under conditions recommended by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jeju National University (IACUC, Jeju, Korea), which approved the animal experiments (approval no. 2019-0006). All mice were housed under pathogen-free conditions and a 12/12 h light/dark cycle and had free access to food and water at 20–25 °C. MCF-7 and MCF-7SCs (5 × 106 per tumor) were injected into the fat pad. Cells were resuspended in 50 µL of Matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) mixed with 50 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Tumor volume and mouse weight were measured on days 10, 17, 24, 27, 29, and 31 after injection. After 31 days, mice were euthanized, and the tumors were collected and weighed.
2.3. Transcriptomic Analysis
Transcriptomic analysis was performed as described previously [21]. Total RNA from MCF-7 and MCF-7SCs was isolated using a TRIzol kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) by Macrogen (Seoul, Korea). Signaling pathways were investigated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS).
2.4. Cell Viability Assay
Cells (2 × 104/mL) were seeded in 96-well dishes and treated with nootkatone (Sigma-Aldrich) (12.5–200 µM). Following 24 and 48 h of incubation, 100 µL of MTT (0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well, with further incubation for 2–3 h at 37 °C. Then, 150 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance at 570 nm was determined using a microplate reader (Tecan Group, Ltd., Salzburg, Austria).
2.5. Cell Invasion Assay
A Transwell system with 24-well plates (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) was used to assess the invasive ability of cells. The upper chambers were coated with 1 mg/mL Matrigel and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Following incubation, MCF-7SCs (1.5 × 105/well) were seeded in serum-free RPMI in the coated upper chambers and supplemented with nootkatone (0, 50 μM). The lower chamber was filled with RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde followed by methanol at room temperature for 20 min. Finally, the cells were stained with 2% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature and observed under a phase-contrast microscope (magnification, 100×).
2.6. Wound Healing Assay
MCF-7SCs (1 × 105/well) were seeded into 6-well cell culture plates and incubated for 24 h. Upon reaching 90% confluence, a 200 µL sterile pipette tip was used to make scratches. Next, cells were rinsed with PBS to remove detached cells, followed by exposure (or not) to nootkatone (0, 12.5, 25, 50 μM) in RPMI containing 5% FBS [22]. After incubation for 24 h, the wound areas were photographed using an inverted phase-contrast microscope (magnification, 40×).
2.7. Flow Cytometric Analysis of the CD44+/CD24− Population
Cells (1 × 106/mL) were seeded into 60 mm plates and treated (or not) with nootkatone. After 24 h of incubation, cells were suspended in 100 μL of immunofluorescence staining buffer supplemented with a PE-conjugated anti-human CD24 antibody (cat. no. 555428; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and FITC-conjugated anti-human CD44 antibody (cat. no. 555478; BD Pharmingen) and incubated for 10 min at 4 °C. Next, cells were rinsed with PBS. A FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and BD FACSDiva™ Software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) were used to analyze the CD44+/CD24− cell population at the Bio-Health Materials Core Facility of Jeju National University.
2.8. ALDEFLUOR Assay
Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity was evaluated using an Aldefluor assay kit (cat. no. #01700; StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada), as described previously [3]. Cells (3 × 104/mL) were loaded into 60 mm dishes. Then, the cells were treated with nootkatone (50 μM) for 24 h and subjected to Aldefluor assay using BD FACSDiva™ Software (BD Biosciences). The negative control was diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), a specific inhibitor of ALDH. ALDH-positive cells were analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer at the Bio-Health Materials Core Facility.
2.9. Mammosphere Formation Assay
Cells (2 × 104/mL) were placed individually in ultralow-attachment dishes filled with complete MammoCult Human Medium (cat. no. #05620; StemCell Technologies) and exposed (or not) to nootkatone (0, 50, 100, or 200 μM). On day 7, mammospheres > 60 μm in diameter were observed under a phase-contrast microscope (magnification, 100×).
2.10. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was extracted from cancer cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen) reagent and reversed-transcribed into cDNA using ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcriptase (cat. no. A3802; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, two-step quantitative real-time PCR was performed (Thermal Cycler Dice Real-Time System; Takara, Shiga, Japan) using a TOPreal™ qPCR 2× PreMIX kit (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Korea). The cycling conditions were as follows: initial hold at 95 °C for 15 min, and 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. A dissociation curve was generated (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 95 °C for 15 s). The real-time PCR primers are listed in Table S1. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control. Expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method. Data were represented after three-time biological and three-time technical replicates [23].
2.11. Western Blot Analysis
Cell lysates were prepared using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified by BCA assay. Proteins (20–40 µg) were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (7.5–15% gels) and electrophoretically transferred to a PVDF membrane. After blocking with 5% skim milk at 4 °C overnight, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA), including anti-AMPK (#2532S), anti-p-AMPK (#2535S), anti-mTOR (#2983S), anti-p-mTOR (#2971S), anti-STAT3 (#9139S), anti-p-STAT3 (#9145S), and anti-GAPDH (#2118S). Except for the anti-GAPDH primary antibody (1:7000 dilution), the primary antibodies were diluted 1:1000. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (HRP) goat anti-rabbit (cat. no. PI-1000-1; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) or anti-mouse (cat. no. PI-2000-1 Vector Laboratories) immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary antibody was diluted 1:5000 before use. The BS ECL Plus Kit (Biosesang, Seongnam, Korea) was used to detect signals. ImageJ software (version 1.53; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to quantify band intensities.
2.12. Docking
In silico docking experiments were performed on an Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4 GHz) Linux PC with SYBYL 7.3 (Tripos, St. Louis, MO, USA) [24]. The binding site was determined using the LigPlot program [25], and 3D images were generated using the PyMOL program (PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, version 2.0; Schrödinger, LLC. Portland, OR, USA).
2.13. XF Seahorse Analysis
The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were measured using an XF-24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA, USA). Cells were seeded in a XF24 plate at 104/well. After 24 h, cells were treated (or not) with nootkatone (50 or 100 μM) in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS. After 24 h, the original medium was replaced with warm Seahorse medium (XF Assay Base Medium, pH 7.4) supplemented with 10 mM glucose, 1 mM pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 2 mM L-glutamine for OCR and ECAR measurements. Cells were treated with 2 μM oligomycin, 1 μM FCCP, and 1 μM rotenone/2 μM antimycin A at the indicated times for OCR measurement, and with 10 mM glucose, 1 μM oligomycin, and 50 mM 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) at the indicated times for ECAR measurement.
2.14. Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three replicates. Student’s t-test and Prism software (version 8.1; GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) were used to analyze the data. A p-value < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.
3. Results
3.1. MCF-7SCs Had Greater Tumorigenicity Than MCF-7 Cells
MCF-7SCs possess stemness properties [3]. To confirm this in vivo, MCF-7 and MCF-7SCs were injected into immunodeficient BALB/C nude mice to compare in vivo tumorigenic ability. As shown in Figure 1A, two tumors were found in mice injected with MCF-7 cells, whereas tumors were formed at all injection sites in mice injected with MCF-7SCs. The tumors formed by MCF-7SCs were significantly larger than those formed by MCF-7 cells. Moreover, MCF-7SCs metastasized to the liver and spleen of mice, indicating higher potent tumorigenic capacity in vivo (Figure S1). The changes in body weight observed post-injection were maintained throughout the study (Figure 1B). As shown in Figure 1C, MCF-7SCs could form the tumors within 10 days after injection, and all tumors remained for up to 31 days. However, parental MCF-7 cells formed four tumors within 10 days post-injection, which decreased to two tumors by 31 days post-injection (Figure 1C). Notably, at the end of the experiment, the weight and volume of tumors derived from mice injected with MCF-7SCs were significantly higher than those derived from MCF-7 cells (Figure 1D,E). Overall, these results indicated that MCF-7SCs had greater tumorigenic potential compared to parental MCF-7 cells.
3.2. Transcriptomic Analysis of MCF-7SCs and MCF-7 Cells
RNA-seq analysis was performed to evaluate the gene expression profiles of MCF-7SCs and MCF-7 cells (Figure 2A). As shown in Figure 2B, transcriptome analysis identified 2436 upregulated and 2321 downregulated genes (p < 0.05; fold difference > 2) in MCF-7SCs compared with MCF-7 cells. A Venn diagram was generated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database tool, which showed that 24 upregulated and 29 downregulated genes overlapped with 250 genes related to self-renewal pathways in CSCs from a published database [26] (Figure 2C). Moreover, a KEGG pathway analysis was conducted to examine signaling pathways implicated in the regulation of the stemness of MCF-7SCs. The identified pathways were associated with stemness regulation, including the tumor microenvironment, quiescent CSCs, the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), resistance to DNA damage repair, CSC signaling, and drug resistance (Figure 2D). CSCs resist DNA damage-induced cell death by nucleotide cleavage repair, mismatch repair, homologous recombination, and activation of a non-homologous end joining system [27]; these genes were activated in MCF-7SCs (Figure 2D). Signaling pathways involved in drug resistance—including EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, platinum drugs, antifolate, and endocrine—were enriched in MCF-7SCs; these pathways are expected to promote cell stemness (Figure 2D). Therefore, the RNA-seq analysis of MCF-7SCs and MCF-7 cells indicated that the former have a distinct gene expression profile that was enriched in signaling pathways related to stemness characteristics.
3.3. MCF-7SCs Preferentially Used Glycolysis for Energy Generation
Transcriptome analysis of MCF-7SCs and MCF-7 cells indicated an alteration in metabolism-related genes in MCF-7SCs, as listed in Table S2. Glucose is a major source of cellular energy. BCSCs have been reported to exhibit a distinct glucose metabolism, as they use glycolysis rather than OXPHOS to produce ATP [28]. Consistent with this observation, significant changes in genes related to glycolysis but not to OXPHOS were observed in MCF-7SCs (Table S2). As shown in Figure 3A, there were 16 upregulated and 8 downregulated genes related to glycolysis signaling. To validate the expression of these upregulated and downregulated glycolysis-related genes, RT-qPCR was performed. As shown in Figure 3B, with the exception of the acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (ACSS2) and aldolase A (ALDOA) genes, expression of all of the glycolysis-related genes tested was consistent with the transcriptome analysis data. A Seahorse XF analyzer was used to measure the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in MCF-7 cells and MCF-7SCs (Figure 3C,D). While the OCR represents OXPHOS utilization, ECAR measures intracellular glycolysis activity [29]. Compared with MCF-7 cells, MCF-7SCs appeared to use glycolysis rather than OXPHOS to produce energy, as evidenced by higher glycolysis and lower basal respiration levels (Figure 3E,F). Reflecting the differences in energy metabolism between the two cell lines, transcriptome analysis revealed 95 and 129 genes related to the AMPK and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways, respectively (Figure S2). Moreover, Western blotting revealed that the relative levels of p-AMPK/AMPK were similar between the two cells. Interestingly, the relative amounts of p-mTOR/mTOR were somewhat higher in MCF-7SC cells (Figure 3G,H). Therefore, MCF-7SCs use glycolysis rather than OXPHOS for energy generation (Figure 3), consistent with a prior report [28].
3.4. Nootkatone Inhibited the Proliferation of MCF-7SCs via AMPK Activation
Nootkatone was previously identified as a potential AMPK activator in A549 lung cancer cells [19]. Thus, we hypothesized that nootkatone might also modulate AMPK signaling in BCSCs. First, we examined whether nootkatone could inhibit cell proliferation in BCSCs. According to MTT assay, nootkatone reduced the viability of MCF-7SCs after 24 and 48 h (Figure 4A). Notably, nootkatone induced p-AMPK/AMPK and reduced p-mTOR/mTOR and p-STAT3/STAT3, indicating the essential role of nootkatone in the activation of AMPK signaling (Figure 4B,C). To validate the role of nootkatone as an AMPK activator, in silico docking was performed. The 3D structure of AMPK was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Because nootkatone has an octahydronaphthalene moiety, 4cfe.pdb was selected for in silico docking. The binding site of its ligand, 5-((6-chloro-5-(1-methyl-1H-indol-5-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) oxy)-2-methylbenzoic acid (named 992) was determined using the LigPlot program as follows: (chain A) Val11, Leu18, Gly28, Lys29, Lys31, Ile46, Asn48, Asp88, Phe90, (chain B) Val81, Arg83, Thr106, Sep108, Asn111, Val113, Ile115 (Figure S3). The apo-protein of AMPK without 992 was prepared by the Sybyl program. After energy minimization, the root mean square deviation between the X-ray crystallographic structure and the apo-protein was 0.0069 Å. To validate the docking process, 992 was docked into the apo-protein. The radius for the flexible docking was set to 6.5 Å, the default in Sybyl. Because the current flexible docking procedure iterated 30 times, 30 ligand–protein complexes were generated. The binding energy ranged between −21.18 and −13.76 kcal/mol. The 3D structure of nootkatone was obtained from PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 20 September 2020), whose PubChem CID was 1268142. Like 992, 30 complexes between nootkatone and the apo-protein of AMPK were generated after 30 iterations. As shown in Figure 4D, 30 ligands were docked into the binding site [25]. The binding energy ranged between −7.20 and −5.41 kcal/mol. The complex showing the lowest binding energy was selected for analysis. The interactions between nootkatone and AMPK were analyzed using the LigPlot program. As shown in Figure 4E, Val24, Phe27, Gly28, Lys29, Ile46, and Leu47 participated in the hydrophobic interactions and Asn48 formed a hydrogen bond between ketone of nootkatone and hydrogen from amino group of peptide bond (2.72 Å). Sixteen residues participated in the interactions between 992 and AMPK, seven residues were involved in nootkatone. Comparing the structure of nootkatone with that of 992, nootkatone was found to be smaller than 992 (Figure S4). As shown in Figure 4F, nootkatone docked well with AMPK. Although the binding affinity of 992 was high at 2 nM EC50, that of nootkatone in vitro was at the micromolar level. This may result in the above binding energy. The in silico docking results demonstrated for the first time that nootkatone can be docked onto AMPK, suggesting an interaction. Taken together, these results suggest that nootkatone inhibits the proliferation of MCF-7SC BCSCs by directly binding to and activating AMPK.
3.5. Nootkatone Impaired Glucose Metabolism in MCF-7SCs
Nootkatone disrupted glucose metabolism in MCF-7SCs, as evidenced by reductions of the OCR and ECAR (Figure 5A–D). Consistent with these results, decreased expression of OXPHOS-related genes [30,31,32], such as ATP synthase lipid-binding protein (ATP5G3), cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4I1 (COX4I1), cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5B (COX5B), NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit A10 (NDUFA10), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α), was observed after nootkatone treatment (Figure 5E). Moreover, reduction of ECAR by nootkatone was supported by decreased expression of genes related to glycolysis, such as glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), hexokinase (HK1), pyruvate kinase 2 (PKM2), phosphoglucomutase (PGM1), and fructose-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) (Figure 5F). Overall, our results demonstrate that nootkatone impairs glucose metabolism in MCF-7SCs.
3.6. Nootkatone Reduced the Stemness of MCF-7SCs
FACS analysis demonstrated that nootkatone dramatically reduced the CD44+/CD24− cell population of MCF-7SCs (Figure 6A,B). Mammosphere formation of MCF-7SCs was significantly diminished by nootkatone treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 6C). In addition, ALDH activity was dramatically reduced by non-lethal concentrations of nootkatone (Figure 6D). We next examined whether nootkatone could affect the migration and invasive abilities of MCF-7SCs using wound healing and chamber assays. At non-lethal concentrations, the migration and invasion abilities of MCF-7SCs were suppressed by nootkatone (Figure 6E–G). Taken together, these results show that nootkatone inhibits the stemness of MCF-7SCs in a dose-dependent manner.
4. Discussion
CSCs play critical roles in the development of chemo- or radioresistance and cancer recurrence [33,34]. CSCs possess characteristics such as the ability to self-renew and differentiate into heterogeneous phenotypes, as well as the capacity to initiate and maintain tumor development [34,35]. In a previous study in our laboratory, MCF-7SC breast cancer cells were found to possess an increased population of CD44+/CD24− cells, higher ALDH levels, reduced ROS levels, overexpressed drug efflux proteins (MDR1 and MRP1), increased mammosphere formation capacity, and increased migration and invasion [3]. To further confirm the stem cell properties of MCF-7SCs in vivo, we focused on tumorigenic capacity in a xenograft model. Indeed, the stemness of MCF-7SCs was confirmed by their strong ability to form tumors in a xenograft mouse model (Figure 1). Our findings demonstrate that MCF-7SCs exhibit characteristics of BCSCs.
Recently developed biological techniques have made it possible to simultaneously identify large numbers of genes at the genome level [36]. One of the most widely used high-throughput techniques for examining cellular RNAs is transcriptome analysis [37]. To evaluate the characteristics of MCF-7SCs at the genetic level, we performed a transcriptomic analysis, which revealed overexpression of signaling pathways involved in self-renewal and differentiation processes, such as Wnt/β-catenin, JAK/STAT3, NF-κB, Notch, and Hedgehog in MCF-7SCs. Enrichment of HIF-1α and autophagy-related signaling pathways was also observed, indicating an alteration in the MCF-7SC tumor environment, as HIF-1α is involved in the regulation and maintenance of CSCs in hypoxic microenvironments [38]. Alterations in the tumor environment were further supported by the enrichment of inflammatory-related signaling pathways including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), Toll-like receptor, and interleukin (IL)-17, which are overexpressed in CSCs [39]. As EMT activation via transforming growth factor (TGF)-β can confer stem properties to cancer cells [40], TGF was also activated in our MCF-7SCs. In particular, CSCs retain resistance to DNA-damage-induced cell death through nucleotide cleavage repair, nucleotide cleavage repair, mismatch repair, homologous recombination, and activation of a non-homologous end joining system [27]; activation of these genes was also observed in MCF-7SCs. Signaling pathways involved in drug resistance, including the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, platinum drugs, antifolate, and endocrine, were enriched in MCF-7SCs; these pathways are expected to promote cell stemness.
Transcriptome analysis of MCF-7SCs revealed a significant change in the expression of genes associated with glycolysis, but not in that of genes associated with OXPHOS (Table S2). Interestingly, among the eight downregulated genes, the expression of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) was 150-fold reduced compared to MCF-7 cells. These results are consistent with a report of a negative correlation between FBP1 expression and the survival rate of patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, a previous study reported the critical role of FBP1 in the metabolism of breast cancer cells. Downregulation of FBP1 enhanced glucose uptake by promoting glycolysis [8]. The ALDH superfamily plays a critical role in cancer metabolism by upregulating the glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), enhancing glycolysis [41]. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family member B1 (ALDH3B1) is overexpressed in many human cancer types [42]; increased expression of ALDH3B1 was also observed in MCF-7SCs. We observed a significant enrichment of the AMPK and mTOR signaling pathways, which regulate glucose metabolism. BCSCs exhibit distinct glucose metabolic machinery, and glycolysis is considered the major source of energy production. A Seahorse XF analyzer was used to measure the OCR and ECAR in MCF-7 cells and MCF-7SCs; the results confirmed that MCF-7SCs used glycolysis rather than OXPHOS for energy, consistent with a previous study [28].
Nootkatone is a bioactive ingredient in grapefruit that exerts anticancer effects in lung and colorectal cancer. Incubation with nootkatone has been reported to induce AMPK activation, resulting in suppression of the Erk and Akt signaling pathways in A549 cells. Moreover, nootkatone treatment inhibited cell proliferation in colorectal cancer cells, as evidenced by a reduction in cyclin D1 [19,20]. On the other hand, nootkatone has also been well characterized as an AMPK activator in vitro and in vivo. Nootkatone activates AMPK; this effect is mediated by LKB1 and CaMKK in the mouse muscle myoblast cells C2C12. Moreover, enhanced AMPK activity along with an elevated AMP/ATP ratio induced phosphorylation of the downstream target acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC). Notably, administration of nootkatone at a concentration of 200 mg/kg in a mouse model dramatically induced AMPK activation together with LKB1 and ACC phosphorylation in the liver and muscle of mice [18]. AMPK can be indirectly activated by numerous modulators that cause AMP or calcium accumulation. These modulators, including metformin, troglitazone, rosiglitazone, resveratrol, quercetin, berberine, and curcumin, activate LKB1 and CaMKK, mediators of AMP or calcium accumulation [43]. By contrast, several other AMPK activators can directly bind and alter the conformation of a specific AMPK subunit, leading to activation of AMPK without any alteration in ATP, ADP, or AMP levels. The first direct AMPK activator is 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR), which can generate AICAR monophosphate (ZMP) [44]. With a structure similar to AMP, ZMP can interact with the γ-subunit of AMPK. Similar to AICAR, multiple compounds, including salicylate (known as the pro-drug of aspirin), benzimidazole (compound 911), compound-13, and MT63-78, have been reported to exert high specificity for the β-subunit of AMPK [45,46,47]. An in vitro study revealed that PT-1 has high affinity for AMPK complexes containing the γ-subunit [48]. We report for the first time that nootkatone interacts with AMPK. Notably, nootkatone treatment (50 and 100 μM) impaired glucose metabolism in MCF-7SCs, as evidenced by reduced glycolysis, possibly due to activation of AMPK. Taken together, our results suggest the possibility of direct activation of AMPK by interaction with nootkatone.
Targeting stem cell populations in tumors is considered an important strategy to increase the effectiveness of cancer treatments [49]. To date, no study has evaluated the effect of nootkatone in BCSCs. The CD44+/CD24− population was possessed as a specific surface marker for breast cancer stem cell identification, promoting cell proliferation and metastasis [50]. A previous study identified a subpopulation with CD44+/CD24− phenotype that was sorted from breast patient samples and exerted a strong tumorigenic capacity in vivo. Specifically, a very low number of CD44+/CD24− cells (100 cells) can form the tumor, whereas up to 10,000 non CD44+/CD24− cells failed to form tumors in NOD/SCID mice. Therefore, targeting the CD44+/CD24− population could be considered one of the promising therapeutic therapies for breast cancer patients [51]. In this paper, nootkatone (50, 100, and 200 μM) could reduce CD44+/CD24−, indicating the vital role of nootkatone in the suppression of this tumorigenic cell population. The ability of nootkatone to inhibit the stem cell properties of MCF-7SCs was further confirmed by decreases in the ALDH+ populations (concentration used 50 μM) and by decreased mammosphere formation (concentration used 50, 100, and 200 μM) following nootkatone treatment. Convincing evidence has shown the role of BCSCs in metastasis and the close relationship between BCSCs and metastasis [52]. Invasion and wound healing assays showed that nootkatone suppressed the metastasis of MCF-7SCs. Together, our results provide a novel approach to target CSC populations using nootkatone to increase the effectiveness of breast cancer treatments. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between type 2 diabetes mellitus and breast cancer, as there was 15% of diabetes mellitus women patients could subsequently develop advanced stage of breast cancer [53]. Interestingly, Guo et al. revealed that nootkatone could inhibit the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as evidenced by the suppression of the α-glucosidase activity after nootkatone treatment in vitro [54]. However, the effect of nootkatone treatment on a diabetes mellitus mouse model remained unclear up to date. Therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate the efficacy of nootkatone on a mouse model harboring both diabetes mellitus and breast cancer.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, MCF-7SCs, BCSCs isolated from parental MCF-7 cells, use glycolysis rather than OXPHOS for their energy supply. Furthermore, for the first time, our data show that nootkatone, a bioactive component of grapefruit, impairs glucose metabolism through AMPK activation and reduces the stemness of MCF-7SCs. The interaction between nootkatone and the active site of AMPK was shown using in silico docking analysis. This study proposes a novel approach using nootkatone to regulate glucose metabolism and target CSC populations to increase the effectiveness of breast cancer treatments.
Abbreviations
ACC | Acetyl-CoA carboxylase |
AICAR | 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside |
ALDH | Aldehyde dehydrogenases |
AMPK | AMP-activated protein kinase |
BCSCs | Breast cancer stem cells |
CaMKK | Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase |
CSCs | Cancer stem cells |
DEAB | Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde |
ECAR | Extracellular acidification rate |
EMT | Epithelial–mesenchymal transition |
FACS | Fluorescence-activated cell sorting |
FBS | Fetal bovine serum |
FC | Fold change |
IgG | Immunoglobulin G |
IL | Interleukin |
KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
LKB1 | Liver kinase B1 |
MRP1 | Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 |
mTOR | Mammalian target of rapamycin |
MTT | 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide |
OCR | Oxygen consumption rate |
OXPHOS | Oxidative phosphorylation |
PCR | Polymerase chain reaction |
PDB | Protein data bank |
RIPA | Radioimmunoprecipitation assay |
RT-qPCR | Quantitative reverse transcription PCR |
TCGA | The Cancer Genome Atlas |
TGF | Transforming growth factor |
TNF | Tumor necrosis factor |
ZMP | 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside monophosphate |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics14050906/s1, Figure S1: Metastasized tumors from BALB/C nude mice injected with MCF-7SCs. Figure S2: The AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway was enriched in MCF-7SCs. Figure S3: Interactions between 992 contained in 4cfe.pdb and AMPK analyzed using the LigPlot program. Figure S4: The structures of nootkatone (top) and 5-((6-chloro-5-(1-methyl-1H-indol-5-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)oxy)-2-methylbenzoic acid (named as 992) (bottom). Table S1: Sequences of RT-qPCR primers. Table S2: Metabolism-related genes (Microsoft Excel™ file).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.T.-K.N., N.B.T. and S.K.C.; methodology, Y.T.-K.N., N.B.T., V.N.-P.T., H.Y.K. and Y.L.; software, Y.T.-K.N., N.B.T., V.N.-P.T., M.K.E. and Y.L.; validation, S.K.C.; formal analysis, Y.T.-K.N., N.B.T., V.N.-P.T., H.Y.K., M.K.E., Y.L. and S.K.C.; investigation, Y.T.-K.N., N.B.T. and S.K.C.; resources, Y.T.-K.N., N.B.T. and S.K.C.; data curation, Y.T.-K.N., N.B.T. and S.K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.T.-K.N. and N.B.T.; writing—review and editing, S.K.C.; visualization, S.K.C.; supervision, S.K.C.; project administration, S.K.C.; funding acquisition, S.K.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2020R1A2C1004349) and by Basic Science Research Program through NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1A6A1A03012862).
Institutional Review Board Statement
All animal studies were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jeju National University (IACUC, Jeju, Korea). The protocol was approved by Jeju National University IACUC Committee Approval (approval no. 2019-0006).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data are available within the article and in the Supplementary Materials.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Heer E., Harper A., Escandor N., Sung H., McCormack V., Fidler-Benaoudia M.M. Global burden and trends in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer: A population-based study. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020;8:e1027–e1037. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30215-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prieto-Vila M., Takahashi R.U., Usuba W., Kohama I., Ochiya T. Drug Resistance Driven by Cancer Stem Cells and Their Niche. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2574. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.To N.B., Nguyen Y.T., Moon J.Y., Ediriweera M.K., Cho S.K. Pentadecanoic Acid, an Odd-Chain Fatty Acid, Suppresses the Stemness of MCF-7/SC Human Breast Cancer Stem-Like Cells through JAK2/STAT3 Signaling. Nutrients. 2020;12:1663. doi: 10.3390/nu12061663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Van Phuc P., Keng S.C., Nguyet N.T.M., Thuy D.T., Ngoc P.K. Isolation and comparison of tumorigenicity of different cell populations from the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line based on CD44 and CD24 markers. Vietnam J. Biotechnol. 2011;9:13–20. doi: 10.15625/1811-4989/9/1/1072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vander Heiden M.G., Cantley L.C., Thompson C.B. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liberti M.V., Locasale J.W. The Warburg Effect: How Does it Benefit Cancer Cells? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016;41:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Peiris-Pagès M., Martinez-Outschoorn U.E., Pestell R.G., Sotgia F., Lisanti M.P. Cancer stem cell metabolism. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:55. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0712-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dong C., Yuan T., Wu Y., Wang Y., Fan T.W., Miriyala S., Lin Y., Yao J., Shi J., Kang T., et al. Loss of FBP1 by Snail-mediated repression provides metabolic advantages in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:316–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Soeda A., Park M., Lee D., Mintz A., Androutsellis-Theotokis A., McKay R.D., Engh J., Iwama T., Kunisada T., Kassam A.B., et al. Hypoxia promotes expansion of the CD133-positive glioma stem cells through activation of HIF-1alpha. Oncogene. 2009;28:3949–3959. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chae Y.C., Kim J.H. Cancer stem cell metabolism: Target for cancer therapy. BMB Rep. 2018;51:319–326. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2018.51.7.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Deshmukh A., Deshpande K., Arfuso F., Newsholme P., Dharmarajan A. Cancer stem cell metabolism: A potential target for cancer therapy. Mol. Cancer. 2016;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0555-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li W., Saud S.M., Young M.R., Chen G., Hua B. Targeting AMPK for cancer prevention and treatment. Oncotarget. 2015;6:7365–7378. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wullschleger S., Loewith R., Hall M.N. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell. 2006;124:471–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Herzig S., Shaw R.J. AMPK: Guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:121–135. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Inoki K., Zhu T., Guan K.L. TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell. 2003;115:577–590. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00929-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lin S.C., Hardie D.G. AMPK: Sensing Glucose as well as Cellular Energy Status. Cell Metab. 2018;27:299–313. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fraatz M.A., Berger R.G., Zorn H. Nootkatone—A biotechnological challenge. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009;83:35–41. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-1968-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murase T., Misawa K., Haramizu S., Minegishi Y., Hase T. Nootkatone, a characteristic constituent of grapefruit, stimulates energy metabolism and prevents diet-induced obesity by activating AMPK. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;299:E266–E275. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00774.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hung L.V.M., Moon J.Y., Ryu J.Y., Cho S.K. Nootkatone, an AMPK activator derived from grapefruit, inhibits KRAS downstream pathway and sensitizes non-small-cell lung cancer A549 cells to adriamycin. Phytomedicine. 2019;63:153000. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yoo E., Lee J., Lertpatipanpong P., Ryu J., Kim C.T., Park E.Y., Baek S.J. Anti-proliferative activity of A. Oxyphylla and its bioactive constituent nootkatone in colorectal cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:881. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07379-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moon J.Y., Manh Hung L.V., Unno T., Cho S.K. Nobiletin Enhances Chemosensitivity to Adriamycin through Modulation of the Akt/GSK3β/β⁻Catenin/MYCN/MRP1 Signaling Pathway in A549 Human Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Nutrients. 2018;10:1829. doi: 10.3390/nu10121829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moon J.Y., Ediriweera M.K., Ryu J.Y., Kim H.Y., Cho S.K. Catechol enhances chemo- and radio-sensitivity by targeting AMPK/Hippo signaling in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2021;45:1133–1141. doi: 10.3892/or.2021.7924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim B.S., Shin S.Y., Ahn S., Koh D., Lee Y.H., Lim Y. Biological evaluation of 2-pyrazolinyl-1-carbothioamide derivatives against HCT116 human colorectal cancer cell lines and elucidation on QSAR and molecular binding modes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017;25:5423–5432. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.07.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wallace A.C., Laskowski R.A., Thornton J.M. LIGPLOT: A program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 1995;8:127–134. doi: 10.1093/protein/8.2.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maguire C.T., Demarest B.L., Hill J.T., Palmer J.D., Brothman A.R., Yost H.J., Condic M.L. Genome-wide analysis reveals the unique stem cell identity of human amniocytes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e53372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Phi L.T.H., Sari I.N., Yang Y.-G., Lee S.-H., Jun N., Kim K.S., Lee Y.K., Kwon H.Y. Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) in Drug Resistance and their Therapeutic Implications in Cancer Treatment. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:5416923. doi: 10.1155/2018/5416923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ciavardelli D., Rossi C., Barcaroli D., Volpe S., Consalvo A., Zucchelli M., De Cola A., Scavo E., Carollo R., D’Agostino D., et al. Breast cancer stem cells rely on fermentative glycolysis and are sensitive to 2-deoxyglucose treatment. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1336. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vangapandu H.V., Gandhi V. Extracellular Flux Assays to Determine Oxidative Phosphorylation and Glycolysis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019;1881:121–128. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8876-1_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bermejo-Nogales A., Calduch-Giner J.A., Pérez-Sánchez J. Unraveling the molecular signatures of oxidative phosphorylation to cope with the nutritionally changing metabolic capabilities of liver and muscle tissues in farmed fish. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0122889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tan Z., Luo X., Xiao L., Tang M., Bode A.M., Dong Z., Cao Y. The Role of PGC1α in Cancer Metabolism and its Therapeutic Implications. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016;15:774–782. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang F., Broughton R.E. Mitochondrial-nuclear interactions: Compensatory evolution or variable functional constraint among vertebrate oxidative phosphorylation genes? Genome Biol. Evol. 2013;5:1781–1791. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Regad T., Sayers T., Rees R. Principles of Stem Cell Biology and Cancer: Future Applications and Therapeutics. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Eyler C.E., Rich J.N. Survival of the fittest: Cancer stem cells in therapeutic resistance and angiogenesis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:2839–2845. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yu Z., Pestell T.G., Lisanti M.P., Pestell R.G. Cancer stem cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012;44:2144–2151. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li J., Liu C., Chen Y., Gao C., Wang M., Ma X., Zhang W., Zhuang J., Yao Y., Sun C. Tumor Characterization in Breast Cancer Identifies Immune-Relevant Gene Signatures Associated with Prognosis. Front. Genet. 2019;10:1119. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Carninci P., Kasukawa T., Katayama S., Gough J., Frith M.C., Maeda N., Oyama R., Ravasi T., Lenhard B., Wells C., et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science. 2005;309:1559–1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1112014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lin Q., Yun Z. Impact of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment on the regulation of cancer stem cell characteristics. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010;9:949–956. doi: 10.4161/cbt.9.12.12347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Storci G., Sansone P., Mari S., D’Uva G., Tavolari S., Guarnieri T., Taffurelli M., Ceccarelli C., Santini D., Chieco P., et al. TNFalpha up-regulates SLUG via the NF-kappaB/HIF1alpha axis, which imparts breast cancer cells with a stem cell-like phenotype. J. Cell. Physiol. 2010;225:682–691. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Aigner L., Bogdahn U. TGF-beta in neural stem cells and in tumors of the central nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;331:225–241. doi: 10.1007/s00441-007-0466-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mori Y., Yamawaki K., Ishiguro T., Yoshihara K., Ueda H., Sato A., Ohata H., Yoshida Y., Minamino T., Okamoto K., et al. ALDH-Dependent Glycolytic Activation Mediates Stemness and Paclitaxel Resistance in Patient-Derived Spheroid Models of Uterine Endometrial Cancer. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;13:730–746. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Marchitti S.A., Orlicky D.J., Brocker C., Vasiliou V. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3B1 (ALDH3B1): Immunohistochemical tissue distribution and cellular-specific localization in normal and cancerous human tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2010;58:765–783. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2010.955773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kim J., Yang G., Kim Y., Kim J., Ha J. AMPK activators: Mechanisms of action and physiological activities. Exp. Mol. Med. 2016;48:e224. doi: 10.1038/emm.2016.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Corton J.M., Gillespie J.G., Hawley S.A., Hardie D.G. 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside. A specific method for activating AMP-activated protein kinase in intact cells? Eur. J. Biochem. 1995;229:558–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hawley S.A., Fullerton M.D., Ross F.A., Schertzer J.D., Chevtzoff C., Walker K.J., Peggie M.W., Zibrova D., Green K.A., Mustard K.J., et al. The ancient drug salicylate directly activates AMP-activated protein kinase. Science. 2012;336:918–922. doi: 10.1126/science.1215327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moreno D., Knecht E., Viollet B., Sanz P. A769662, a novel activator of AMP-activated protein kinase, inhibits non-proteolytic components of the 26S proteasome by an AMPK-independent mechanism. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:2650–2654. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hunter R.W., Foretz M., Bultot L., Fullerton M.D., Deak M., Ross F.A., Hawley S.A., Shpiro N., Viollet B., Barron D., et al. Mechanism of action of compound-13: An α1-selective small molecule activator of AMPK. Chem. Biol. 2014;21:866–879. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jensen T.E., Ross F.A., Kleinert M., Sylow L., Knudsen J.R., Gowans G.J., Hardie D.G., Richter E.A. PT-1 selectively activates AMPK-γ1 complexes in mouse skeletal muscle, but activates all three γ subunit complexes in cultured human cells by inhibiting the respiratory chain. Biochem. J. 2015;467:461–472. doi: 10.1042/BJ20141142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ramos E.K., Hoffmann A.D., Gerson S.L., Liu H. New Opportunities and Challenges to Defeat Cancer Stem Cells. Trends Cancer. 2017;3:780–796. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li W., Ma H., Zhang J., Zhu L., Wang C., Yang Y. Unraveling the roles of CD44/CD24 and ALDH1 as cancer stem cell markers in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:13856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14364-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Al-Hajj M., Wicha M.S., Benito-Hernandez A., Morrison S.J., Clarke M.F. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:3983–3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530291100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Velasco-Velázquez M.A., Popov V.M., Lisanti M.P., Pestell R.G. The role of breast cancer stem cells in metastasis and therapeutic implications. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;179:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Eketunde A.O. Diabetes as a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer. Cureus. 2020;12:e8010. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Guo Y., Hou E., Ma N., Liu Z., Fan J., Yang R. Discovery, biological evaluation and docking studies of novel N-acyl-2-aminothiazoles fused (+)-nootkatone from Citrus paradisi Macf. as potential α-glucosidase inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2020;104:104294. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available within the article and in the Supplementary Materials.