Abstract
Recently, Candida glabrata has been recognized as one of the most common fungal species that is highly associated with invasive candidiasis. Its spread could be attributed to its increasing resistance to antifungal drugs. Thus, there is a high need for safer and more efficient therapeutic alternatives such as plant extracts. Here, we investigated the antifungal potential of Encephalartos villosus leaves methanol extract (EVME) against C. glabrata clinical isolates. Tentative phytochemical identification of 51 metabolites was conducted in EVME using LC–MS/MS. EVME demonstrated antifungal activity with minimum inhibitory concentrations that ranged from 32 to 256 µg/mL. The mechanism of the antifungal action was studied by investigating the impact of EVME on nucleotide leakage. Additionally, a sorbitol bioassay was performed, and we found that EVME affected the fungal cell wall. In addition, the effect of EVME was elucidated on the efflux activity of C. glabrata isolates using acridine orange assay and quantitative real-time PCR. EVME resulted in downregulation of the expression of the efflux pump genes CDR1, CDR2, and ERG11 in the tested isolates with percentages of 33.33%, 41.67%, and 33.33%, respectively. Moreover, we investigated the in vivo antifungal activity of EVME using a murine model with systemic infection. The fungal burden was determined in the kidney tissues. Histological and immunohistochemical studies were carried out to investigate the effect of EVME. We noticed that EVME reduced the congestion of the glomeruli and tubules of the kidney tissues of the rats infected with C. glabrata. Furthermore, it decreased both the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha and the abnormal collagen fibers. Our results reveal, for the first time, the potential in vitro (by inhibition of the efflux activity) and in vivo (by decreasing the congestion and inflammation of the kidney tissues) antifungal activity of EVME against C. glabrata isolates.
Keywords: efflux, kidney, LC–MS/MS, qRT-PCR, survival curve, TNF-α
1. Introduction
Globally, fungal infections have been increasing dramatically over the past few decades. Several fungi, such as Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus, commonly cause human infections. Candida spp. is regarded as the most common cause of nosocomial infections caused by fungi. Among all hospitalized patients, immunocompromised patients are the most affected by fungal infections, with high morbidity and mortality rates [1].
Candida glabrata is a common fungal pathogen in humans. It has become the second worldwide cause of candidiasis after C. albicans. It is a commensal fungus of mucosal surfaces such as the oropharyngeal cavity, vagina, and gastrointestinal tract. However, it is also an opportunistic pathogen capable of causing superficial and disseminated life-threatening infections such as candidemia [2].
The fungus C. glabrata is a haploid pathogenic microorganism, and it is intrinsically less sensitive to azole antifungals. Thus, invasive infections are highly associated with a relatively high mortality rate, especially in immunocompromised and elderly patients. The infections caused by C. glabrata are especially difficult to treat owing to its high antifungal resistance to many antifungals such as echinocandins and azoles [2]. Its spreading resistance to many antifungal drugs is a surprising and alarming issue.
Efflux is one of the major mechanisms of resistance of C. glabrata to antifungal agents. It is mainly mediated by major facilitators superfamily as well as ATP-binding cassette transporters pumps. These pumps are encoded by MDR and CDR genes, respectively [3]. The rapid efflux in the resistant isolates can prevent the antifungal drug from being accumulated in the fungal cells to lethal levels. Thus, many resistant C. glabrata clinical isolates are able to display a transcriptional activation of the genes encoding efflux pumps. These isolates exhibit reduced intracellular accumulation of the antifungal drugs, thereby confirming the major role of efflux pumps in antifungal drug extrusion and resistance [4].
This fact necessitates developing novel antifungal therapies. Therefore, many researchers have investigated the efficacy of natural and synthetic agents as antifungal agents [5]. Natural agents, particularly plants, are rich sources for a wide variety of bioactive secondary metabolites such as saponins, tannins, alkaloids, terpenoids, and flavonoids [6,7]. These compounds have been reported to possess in vitro antifungal activity. In addition, plants have many advantages for treating fungal infections, as they are safe, effective, available, and cheap [8]. Thus, the antimicrobial activities of plant extracts are the basis of various applications, such as pharmaceuticals, food preservation, alternative medicine, and natural therapies [9].
Encephalartos (Family Zamiaceae), the second-largest extant genus of the Cycadales, is most frequently cultivated in Africa, south of the Sahara, with roughly 66 species. The tropical regions of central and east Africa have many species, but South Africa has more than half of them. They are endemism-rich and occupy various climate regimes and habitats [10,11].
Encephalartos villosus Lem. is one of the most popular decorative dwarf cycads. It is often known as poor man’s cycad. E. villosus prefers the shade and has gracefully spreading leaves with glossy dark green leaflets. This species overgrows and will mature into a large plant in 5 to 8 years. A former phytochemical study of E. villosus leaves revealed the isolation of four flavone glycosides luteolin-7-rutinoside, luteolin-7-glucoside, luteolin-7-rhamnoside, and apigenin-7-glucoside and two new illudalane sesquiterpenes, named encephaldiene 1 and encephaldiene 2. The plant E. villosus exhibited antifungal Aspergillus fumigatus and antibacterial action against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bacillus subtilis, and Escherichia coli [12].
In the current study, we explored the antifungal efficacy of EVME against C. glabrata clinical isolates both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, the phytochemical profile of EVME was investigated using LC–MS.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals
All media were obtained from Oxoid, UK. Chemicals and solvents were obtained from Merck, NJ, USA.
2.2. Plant Materials
Encephalartos villosus Lem. leaves were collected from Al Orman Botanical Garden on 15 July 2021. The plant was recognized by Dr. Esraa Ammar, Plant Ecology, Tanta University. A voucher sample (PG-G-106-E) was deposited at the Herbarium of the Faculty of Science, Tanta University. The plant was dried at room temperature for ten days, then in an oven at 40 °C for two days, and then ground to a coarse, powdered form (particle size 2000/335). The powder (300 g) was extracted by methanol (4 L × three times) at two-day intervals using the cold maceration method at room temperature to yield 31.39 g of EVME.
2.3. Animals
A total of 30 male albino rats, which weighed 120–150 g and were aged eight weeks old, were obtained from the Animal House of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. They were allowed to acclimate for seven days under the standard environmental conditions. In addition, they were maintained on a regular feed and water ad libitum and allowed to adapt for one week. The authorized standards of using laboratory animals were followed according to the Faculty of Pharmacy Research Ethical Committee (Tanta University), with the code number (TP/RE/04-22-P-008).
2.4. LC–MS/MS for Metabolite Profiling
The liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI–MS/MS) analysis was carried out at the Children’s Cancer Hospital’s Proteomics and Metabolomics Unit (57357). Adopting the criteria previously described [13,14]. Secondary metabolites of the EVME were analyzed using an ExionLC-High flow L.C., Sciex®, Framingham, MA, USA, Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) analytical technique, combined with a Triple time-of-flight (TOF) 5600+(Sciex®) for IDA acquisition and Analyst TF 1.7.1 (Sciex®) for LC–Triple TOF control. After the filtration process via an in-line filter disk (0.5 μm × 3.0 mm, Phenomenex®, Torrance, CA, USA), 1 μg/mL of EVME was injected into an X Select HSS T3 XP ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) column (2.5 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm, Waters®, Milford, MA, USA) at 40 °C and eluted using buffer systems of 1% methanol in 5 mM ammonium formate buffer at pH 3 and pH 8 as solvent A (for positive mode MS analysis) and B (for negative mode MS analysis), respectively, and 100% of acetonitrile as solvent C at 0.3 mL/min flow rate. Gradient mobile phase mixtures were composed of 90% solvent A or B and 10% of solvent C; they were injected for 20 min, then reversed into 10 % of solvent A or B to 90% of solvent C for the next 5 min, and finalized by loading of the starting mixture for the last 3 min. The resultant total ion chromatogram (TIC) was used for master view peaks extraction with a signal-to-noise ratio greater than 5 (non-targeted analysis) and more than three features’ intensities of the sample-to-blank ratio. Data interpretation was accomplished by applying a Reifycs Abf (Analysis Base File) Converter (Reifycs®, Tokyo, Japan) for Wiff file conversion and MS-DIAL 4.6 (RIKEN®, Tokyo, Japan).
To identify chemicals, PeakViewTM software was used to compare retention times and m/z values obtained with MS and MS2. The XIC Manager in PeakViewTM software was used to calculate peak area values. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) for each targeted analyte were automatically created and compared with a user-defined threshold [15].
2.5. In Vitro Antifungal Activity of EVME
2.5.1. Fungi
C. glabrata clinical isolates were obtained from different specimens, including blood, sputum, and urine, from the clinical laboratories of Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Egypt. These specimens were obtained from patients for routine diagnosis, and their data were obscured. First, the specimens were inoculated onto Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) plates, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C with a relative humidity of 97%. Candida isolates were identified via microscopical examination, as well as examination using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI–TOF) (bioMerieux, France).
2.5.2. Antifungal Susceptibility
Agar well dilution method was utilized to investigate the antifungal activity of EVME, as previously described [16,17]. After spreading the fungal suspension on the surface of SDA plates, cups were punched off the agar. Each plate contained three wells—one with EVME at a concentration of 1000 µg/mL, a second well considered as a negative control (10% dimethyl sulfoxide or DMSO), and a third well, which was a positive control (fluconazole). The plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C and inspected for inhibition zone formation.
2.5.3. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)
MICs were determined using the broth microdilution method in microtitration plates [17]. In brief, after centrifugation of the fungal suspensions and washing of the obtained pellets, they were resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI 1640) to obtain a fungal concentration of 1× 103 CFU/mL, and 50 µL was added to each well. EVME was serially diluted from 1024 to 1 µg/mL in the wells of the microtitration plates. In addition, each plate had a well that contained fungi only (positive control) and another well that contained RPMI 1640 only, without fungi (negative control). The plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C. MIC values of EVME were recorded as the lowest concentrations, which inhibited the growth of C. glabrata isolates.
2.5.4. Time–Kill Curve
It was carried out in order to determine the time–kill kinetics for C. glabrata isolates [18]. In brief, overnight cultures of C. glabrata isolates in brain–heart infusion (BHI) broth were standardized to 106 CFU/mL, and different concentrations of EVME (0.5× MIC, 1× MIC, 2× MIC, 4× MIC, and 8× MIC values) were added. Then, the optical density (OD) values were recorded at 530 nm at different time intervals (1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 24 h of incubation) at 37 °C. Finally, graphs of OD values against incubation time were constructed.
2.5.5. Nucleotide Leakage
The release of nucleotides from the fungal cells was evaluated as described before [18]. Briefly, overnight cultures of C. glabrata isolates were incubated with EVME (0.5× MIC). Then, OD values at 260 nm were recorded at different time points (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h) using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU, Japan). Positive control (using fluconazole) and negative control (fungal isolates in BHI) were used.
2.5.6. Sorbitol Protection Assay
This test was carried out to determine the effect of EVME on the fungal cell wall [18]. EVME was serially diluted (starting from a concentration of 1025 µg/mL) in microtitration plates containing BHI broth and 0.8 M sorbitol. Positive and negative controls were included in each plate as previously described. The microtitration plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the lowest concentrations of EVME inhibited the fungal growth were recorded.
2.5.7. Phenotypic Detection of Efflux Pump Inhibition
It was performed as described previously [4]. C. glabrata isolates were overnight grown on SDA then fungal suspensions (0.5 McFarland) were prepared. Using sterile cotton swabs, the fungal suspensions, before and after treatment with EVME, were swabbed onto SDA containing different concentrations of acridine orange (1, 5, 10, and 20 mg/mL) from the center of the plate toward its periphery. With the cartwheel design, the swabbed SDA plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and the fluorescence of the fungal swabs was visualized using a UV transilluminator (Kowell, Spain). The lowest concentration of acridine orange that produced green fluorescence was recorded for each C. glabrata isolate. Isolates that did not produce any fluorescence at the tested concentrations of acridine orange were considered to have strong efflux activity. In addition, isolates that produced fluorescence at a high concentration of acridine orange (20 mg/mL) were considered to have moderate efflux activity. On the other hand, isolates that emitted fluorescence at 5 and 10 mg/mL were considered to have weak efflux activity. Isolates that produced fluorescence at 1 mg/mL were considered to lack efflux activity.
2.5.8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) for Detection of the Expression of the Efflux Pump Genes
In order to determine the influence of EVME on the gene expression of the genes that encode efflux pumps (CDR1, CDR2, and ERG11), RT-PCR was used. After extracting the fungal RNA using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), cDNA was obtained using the SensiFAST™ cDNA Kit (Bioline, UK). qRT-PCR was accomplished using SensiFAST™ SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Bioline, UK), as described by the manufacturer. The utilized primers are listed in Table S1, using the URA3 gene as a reference gene [4]. Gene expression in C. glabrata isolates before treatment was considered to be one.
2.6. In Vivo Antifungal Activity of EVME
2.6.1. Experimental Protocol
All animals were subjected to immunosuppression using corticosteroid injection. Then, they were randomly grouped into the following three groups [19]:
Group I (C. glabrata group): Ten rats each received a fungal suspension of C. glabrata (0.1 mL) once via intravenous (IV) injection in the tail vein;
Group II (fluconazole treated group): Ten rats each received a fungal suspension of C. glabrata (0.1 mL) once via IV injection in the tail vein. After that, this group received fluconazole (10 mg/kg) via intraperitoneal (IP) injection for one week;
Group III (EVME treated group): Ten rats each received a fungal suspension of C. glabrata (0.1 mL) once via IV injection in the tail vein. Then, this group received 50 mg/kg EVME via IP injection once per day for one week.
Rats were monitored for 14 days after infection to determine the survival rate. After being anesthetized, the rats were sacrificed, blood samples were collected once after scarification, and kidney tissues were acquired for histological and immunohistochemical studies. Moreover, the fungal burden in the kidney tissues was calculated as the number of CFU/g kidney tissues.
2.6.2. Kidney Function Tests
Serum (collected after blood clotting) was used to assess kidney function by detecting blood urea and serum creatinine levels.
2.6.3. Histological Assessment
Samples of kidney tissues were collected from each rat, then fixed with formalin (10%) for 72 h to be histopathologically examined. The tissue was dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned (3 μm), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) [20] and Masson’s trichrome stains. Finally, photos were captured using a digital camera [13,14].
2.6.4. Immunohistochemical Studies
Immunostaining was carried out for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) using a TNF-α polyclonal antibody (PA1- 40281, Invitrogen, Massachusetts, USA). Immunostaining of TNF-α was examined using a light microscope at a magnification of ×100. TNF-α staining was regarded as a bad indication. We graded the staining strength into (0) negative, meaning an absence of immunoreactive cells; (1) weak, meaning the presence of 1–10% immunoreactive cells; (2) moderate, meaning the presence of 11–50% immunoreactive cells; and (3) strong meaning presence of more than 50% immunoreactive cells [21].
2.7. Statistical Analysis
Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation, as all the performed tests were carried out in triplicate. The differences among the tested groups were evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc test (Tukey). The difference was considered to be significant when p < 0.05. Furthermore, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve was utilized to calculate the survival of rats using Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., California, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Phytochemical Profiling of EVME
LC–ESI–MS/MS analysis of EVME (negative ESI mode) tentatively identified 51 secondary metabolites compounds for the first time. The identified metabolites were flavonoid and glycosides, phenolic, carboxylic acids, fatty acids, etc. Table 1 shows the LC–ESI–MS/MS analysis of EVME metabolites, and Figure 1 presents the total ion chromatogram (TIC) of EVME in negative mode, while Figure S1 shows MS2 spectral fragmentation of all identified metabolites.
Table 1.
No. | Error | Metabolite Name | Rt Min | Molecular Formula | Identification | Fragments or MS2 Ions m/z |
Precursor m/z
[M–H]− |
Theoretical Mass | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phenolic or Organic Acids Derivatives | ||||||||||
1 | −4.7 | D-Malic acid | 1.098 | C4H6O5 | Beta hydroxy acids and derivatives | 59.01, 71.01, 115.00 133.01 | 133.0150 | 134.0230 | [22] | |
2 | −2.1 | Shikimic acid | 1.111 | C7H10O5 | Shikimic acids and derivatives | 73.02, 137.04, 173.04 | 173.0460 | 174.0540 | [23] | |
3 | −0.1 | Maleic acid | 1.112 | C4H4O4 | Dicarboxylic acids and derivatives | 71.01, 115.01 | 115.0032 | 116.0112 | ||
4 | −0.2 | D-Quinic acid | 1.136 | C7H12O6 | Quinic acids and derivatives | 85.02, 145.04, 173.04, 191.05 | 191.0562 | 192.0642 | ||
5 | −0.9 | 3,4-Dihydroxy benzoic acid |
1.257 | C7H6O4 | Hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives | 109.03, 153.01 | 153.0187 | 154.0267 | [24] | |
6 | 3.1 | Caffeic acid | 1.344 | C9H8O4 | Hydroxycinnamic acids | 59.02, 89.02, 135.04, 179.05 | 179.0545 | 180.0625 | ||
7 | 4.4 | 3-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-phenyl) prop-2-enoic acid | 2.076 | C10H10O4 | Hydroxycinnamic acids | 134.03, 193.05 | 193.0524 | 194.0604 | ||
8 | 0.8 | Salicylic acid | 4.442 | C7H6O3 | Salicylic acid | 91.02, 108.01, 136.01, 137.02 | 137.0238 | 138.0318 | [25] | |
9 | 0.8 | (+/−)-cis,trans-abscisic acid | 5.286 | C15H20O4 | Abscisic acids and derivatives | 151.07, 219.13, 263.11 | 263.1278 | 264.1358 | [25] | |
10 | −0.7 | 5-Methoxy salicylic acid | 6.857 | C8H8O4 | M-Methoxybenzoic acids and derivatives | 108.02, 152.01, 167.03 | 167.0352 | 168.0432 | ||
11 | 6.0 | Rosmarinic acid | 7.136 | C18H16O8 | Coumaric acids and derivatives | 181.04, 329.09, 359.11 | 359.1105 | 360.1185 | [26] | |
12 | −3.1 | Isocitrate | 27.721 | C6H8O7 | Tricarboxylic acids and derivatives | 150.96, 190.95 | 191.1050 | 192.1130 | ||
Flavonoids and related metabolites | ||||||||||
13 | −3.7 | Baicalein-7-O-glucuronide | 1.293 | C21H18O11 | 445.07 | Flavonoid-7-O-glucuronides | 102.95, 191.05, 269.02 377.07, 445.14 | 445.1807 | 446.1887 | [27] |
14 | −2.1 | Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside | 4.930 | C28H32O16 | 623.12 | Flavonoid-3-O-glycosides | 285.03, 470.87, 579.00, 623.12 | 623.1269 | 624.1349 | [28] |
15 | −3.1 | Procyanidin B2 | 5.006 | C30H26O12 | 577.13 | Biflavonoids and polyflavonoids | 407.07, 425.08, 577.13 | 577.1369 | 578.1449 | [28] |
16 | 5.0 | Kaempferol-3-O-alpha-L-rhamnoside | 5.223 | C21H20O10 | 431.18 | Flavonoid-3-O-glycosides | 151.04, 179.05, 362.88, 431.19 | 431.1890 | 432.1970 | |
17 | −3.6 | Daidzein-8-C-glucoside | 5.452 | C21H20O9 | 415.15 | Isoflavonoid C-glycosides | 210.92, 286.92, 415.16 | 415.1572 | 416.1652 | [29, 30] |
18 | −0.1 | Naringenin-7-O-glucoside | 6.170 | C21H22O10 | 433.20 | Flavonoid-7-O-glycosides | 271.06, 387.18, 433.10 | 433.2068 | 434.2148 | |
19 | −2.2 | (+−)-Taxifolin | 6.492 | C15H12O7 | 303.05 | Flavanonols | 125.02, 179.00, 1990.95, 285.04, 303.04 | 303.0520 | 304.0600 | |
20 | 2.5 | Hyperoside | 6.542 | C21H20O12 | 463.08 | Flavonoid-3-O-glycosides | 218.94, 286.94. 300.02, 326.92, 394.90, 463.08 | 463.0858 | 464.0938 | |
21 | 0.5 | Apigenin 8-C-glucoside | 6.542 | C21H20O10 | 431.09 | Flavonoid 8-C-glycosides | 269.04,311.05, 362.89, 431.20 | 431.0956 | 432.1036 | |
22 | −0.1 | Formononetin | 6.734 | C16H12O4 | 267.08 | 4’-O-methylisoflavones | 133.02, 193.04, 252.06, 267.08 | 267.0875 | 268.0955 | |
23 | 0.9 | Procyanidin B1 | 6.785 | C30H26O12 | 577.14 | Biflavonoids and polyflavonoids | 245.04, 425.08, 577.12 | 577.1337 | 578.1417 | [31] |
24 | 0.6 | Luteolin-7-O-glucoside | 6.913 | C21H20O11 | 447.09 | Flavonoid-7-O-glycosides | 285.03, 327.04, 447.09 | 447.0923 | 448.1003 | |
25 | 8.9 | Isookanin-7-glucoside | 6.926 | C21H22O11 | 449.09 | Flavonoid-7-O-glycosides | 151.00, 287.04, 449.09 | 449.0952 | 450.1032 | |
26 | 0.4 | Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside | 7.417 | C22H22O12 | 477.10 | Flavonoid-3-O-glycosides | 285.03, 299.01, 315.04, 477.09 | 477.1033 | 478.1113 | |
27 | −0.1 | Kaempferol-7-neohesperidoside | 7.539 | C27H30O15 | 593.14 | Flavonoid-7-O-glycosides | 269.04, 593.13, | 593.1483 | 594.1563 | |
28 | −0.9 | Apigenin-7-O-glucoside | 7.700 | C21H20O10 | 431.09 | Flavonoid-7-O-glycosides | 268.03, 311.06, 431.09 | 431.0988 | 432.1068 | |
29 | 10.9 | Kaempferol-3-Glucuronide | 7.893 | C21H18O12 | 461.10 | Flavonoid-3-O-glucuronides | 256.92, 299.09, 392.89, 461.09 | 461.1031 | 462.1111 | |
30 | −3.7 | 3’ 4’ 5 7-Tetrahydroxy flavanone |
8.678 | C13H12O6 | 287.05 | Flavanones | 135.04, 151.00, 218.94, 287.06 | 287.0984 | 288.1064 | |
31 | −0.2 | Kaempferol-3-O-alpha-L-arabinoside | 8.751 | C20H18O10 | 417.11 | Flavonoid-3-O-glucuronides | 179.05, 362.88, 431.19 | 417.1194 | 418.1274 | |
32 | −0.1 | Naringenin | 9.744 | C15H12O5 | 271.09 | Flavanones | 228.07, 255.05, 271.09 | 271.0985 | 272.1065 | [32] |
33 | −2.6 | 3’-Methoxy-4’,5,7-trihydroxy flavonol | 10.368 | C16H12O7 | 315.05 | Flavonols | 257.04, 300.02, 315.04 | 315.0528 | 316.0608 | |
34 | −3.0 | Apigenin | 10.428 | C15H10O5 | 269.04 | Flavones | 117.03, 151.00, 181.06, 225.05, 269.04 | 269.0467 | 270.0547 | [32] |
35 | 0.8 | Luteolin | 11.175 | C15H10O6 | 285.07 | Flavones | 151.00, 270.06, 263.11 | 285.0763 | 286.0843 | [32] |
36 | 0.7 | Rhoifolin | 11.421 | C27H30O14 | 577.13 | Flavonoid-7-O-glycosides | 291.19, 464.94, 577.13 | 577.1346 | 578.1426 | |
37 | −4.0 | 3 5 7-Trihydroxy-4’-methoxyflavone | 12.886 | C16H12O6 | 299.09 | Flavonols | 119.04, 179.03, 193.05, 299.09 | 299.0558 | 300.0638 | |
38 | −0.1 | 4’,5,7-Trihydroxy flavonol | 13.890 | C15H10O6 | 285.11 | Flavonols | 119.04, 149.99, 165.02, 285.07 | 285.1115 | 286.1195 | |
39 | −0.4 | Hesperetin | 14.598 | C16H14O6 | 301.10 | 4’-O-methylated flavonoids | 138.03, 151.03, 286.08, 301.10 | 301.0692 | 302.0772 | [33] |
40 | −0.2 | Luteolin-3’, 7-di-O-glucoside | 17.799 | C27H30O16 | 609.13 | Flavonoid-7-O-glycosides | 564.90, 594.11, 609.13 | 609.1440 | 610.1520 | |
Fatty acids | ||||||||||
41 | −0.8 | 3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl glutaric acid | 1.159 | C6H10O5 | 161.04 | Hydroxy fatty acids | 57.03, 99.04, 161.04 | 161.0452 | 162.0532 | |
42 | −2.7 | 2-Isopropyl malic acid | 1.331 | C7H12O5 | 175.05 | Hydroxy fatty acids | 101.02, 113.05, 175.06 | 175.0599 | 176.0679 | |
43 | −0.5 | Citraconic acid | 1.394 | C5H6O4 | 129.01 | Methyl-branched fatty acids | 84.99, 129.01 | 129.0189 | 130.0269 | |
44 | 1.5 | Citramalate | 1.407 | C5H8O5 | 147.06 | Hydroxy fatty acids | 72.98, 87.00, 129.01, 147.06 | 147.0647 | 148.0727 | |
45 | −4.0 | Gamma-Linolenic acid | 18.900 | C18H30O2 | 277.14 | Linoleic acids and derivatives | 141.09, 233.15, 277.13 | 277.1465 | 278.1545 | |
Others | ||||||||||
46 | −0.3 | E-3,4,5’-Trihydroxy-3’-glucopyranosyl stilbene | 1.123 | C20H22O9 | 405.01 | Stilbene glycosides | 190.96, 191.05, 243.02, 369.03, 405.09 | 405.1208 | 406.1288 | |
47 | −0.6 | Esculin | 1.172 | C15H16O9 | 339.12 | Coumarin glycosides | 149.01, 175.02, 202.90, 295.10, 339.11 | 339.1296 | 340.1376 | |
48 | 0.2 | Catechin | 5.452 | C15H14O6 | 289.07 | Catechins | 109.02, 125.02, 179.03, 203.03, 245.07, 289.06 | 289.0711 | 290.0791 | [31] |
49 | 3.0 | Hinokitiol | 6.815 | C10H12O2 | 163.07 | Tropolones | 119.08, 135.08, 163.07 | 163.0751 | 164.0831 | |
50 | −0.4 | Daphnetin | 7.295 | C9H6O4 | 177.01 | 7,8-Dihydroxycoumarins | 117.09, 133.03, 149.02, 163.01, 177.01 | 177.018 | 178.0260 | |
51 | 1.0 | E-4,5’-Dihydroxy-3-methoxy-3’-glucopyranosyl stilbene | 9.547 | C21H24O9 | 419.07 | Stilbene glycosides | 257.02, 343.01, 363.12, 419.06 | 419.0748 | 420.0828 |
3.1.1. Identification of Carboxylic, Phenolic, and Fatty Acids
According to our LC–MS/MS analysis, EVME exhibited variety of phenolic compounds such as D-(+)-malic acid (m/z 133.02), (−)-shikimic acid (m/z 173.04), maleic acid (m/z 115.0), D-(−)-quinic acid (m/z 191.05), 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (m/z 153.01), caffeic acid (m/z 179.05), 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy phenyl) prop-2-enoic acid (m/z 193.05), salicylic acid (m/z 137.02), (+/−)-cis,trans-abscisic acid (m/z 263.12), 5-methoxy salicylic acid (m/z 167.03), rosmarinic acid (m/z 359.11), and isocitrate (m/z 190.95). D-(−)-quinic acid was the major detected carboxylic acid according to peak height and area measurements.
The detected fatty acids were 3-hydroxy-3- methyl glutaric acid, 2-Isopropyl malic acid, citraconic acid, citramalate, and gamma-Linolenic acid [M-H] at m/z values of 161.04, 175.05, 129.01, 147.06, and 277.14, respectively.
3.1.2. Identification of Flavonoid Derivatives
Flavonoid aglycones and their glycosides resemble most of the compounds detected in EVME. Different subclasses such as flavones, flavanones, flavonols, flavanonols, as well as isoflavonoids, biflavonoids, and polyflavonoids, were found.
Apigenin and luteolin flavone aglycones were established by the corresponding base peak and the fragmentation pattern for each compound. In the negative ion mode analysis, the MS/MS fragment at m/z 151.00 is characteristic for 5, 7-dihydroxy flavonoids, which were detected in apigenin and luteolin.
The [M-H]− ion of luteolin-7-O-glucoside and luteolin-3’, 7-di-O-glucoside at m/z 447.09 and 609.13, with loss of neutral ions of one or two hexose or glucose molecules (324 Da), was detected by fragment ion of aglycone at m/z 285.03. The [M-H]− ion of baicalein-7-O-glucuronide was observed at m/z 445.07 and the baicalein ion fragment presented at m/z 269.02 due to glucuronide moiety loss. Rhoifolin (apigenin 7-O-neohesperidoside) ion fragment was found at m/z 577.13.
The tentatively identified flavanone aglycones were naringenin and hesperetin, with [M-H]− ion at m/z 271.09 and 301.10, respectively. They are the most highly representative individual compounds in EVME. Hesperetin showed [M-H]− ions at m/z 301.1 and MS/MS fragment ions at 151 [C7H4O4]-H-. The pseudo molecular ions of 3’,4’,5,7-Tetrahydroxy flavanone, naringenin-7-O-glucoside, and isookanin-7-glucoside were detected at m/z 287.05, 433.20, and 449.09, respectively.
Kaempferol and its glycosides represent the majority of the flavonol subclass. In the negative mode analysis, the MS/MS fragment at m/z 151 confirmed the 5,7-dihydroxy pattern of the aglycones. The loss of 162 Daltons identified hexose or glucose motifs, the loss of 146 Da identified the rhamnose moiety, and the loss of rutinoside or neohesperoside (308 Da). LC–ESI/MS showed flavonol metabolites such as kaempferol-3-O-α-L-rhamnoside (m/z 431.18), Kaempferol-7-neohesperidoside (m/z 593.14) kaempferol-3-glucuronide (m/z 461.10), kaempferol-3-O- α -L-arabinoside (m/z 417.11), 3’-methoxy-4’,5,7-trihydroxy flavonol (m/z 315.05), hyperoside (m/z 463.08), 3,5,7-trihydroxy-4’-methoxyflavone (m/z 299.09), and 4’,5,7-trihydroxy flavonol (m/z 285.11).
The pseudo-molecular ions of isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside and isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside were noted at m/z 623.12 and 477.10, respectively. Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside presented MS/MS fragments at m/z 315.04 [M-H-glc]-, 299.01 [M-H-glc-H2O]-, and 285.03 [M-H-glc-OCH3]-, while isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside observed ions due to neutral loss of CO2 (44 Da) at m/z 579.00, and loss of rutinoside (308 Da) at m/z 315. Flavanonol subclass as (+−)-taxifolin was also identified at m/z 303.05.
The isoflavonoid deprotonated ion at m/z 415.15 was identified for daidzein-8-C-glucoside with neutral loss of glucose (162 Da) at m/z 253 [M-H-glc]-. Formononetin was also detected at m/z 267.08 as 4’-O-methyl isoflavones.
Two biflavonoids detected in EVME were procyanidin B1 (13) and B2 (23) at m/z 577.13 and 579.14 in negative mode.
3.1.3. Identification of Coumarins and Other Derivatives
Two coumarins were detected as esculin and daphnetin [M-H]− at m/z 339.12 and 177.01, respectively. Esculin is a coumarin glycoside derivative, with MS/MS fragments at m/z 295 due to neutral loss of CO2 (44 Da), 175 [M-2H-glc]-, and 149 [C5H10O5]-H-. Daphnetin is 7,8-dihydroxycoumarins identified with MS/MS fragments at m/z 117.09, 133.03, 149.02, 163.01 and 177.01.
Two stilbenes’ derivatives were detected—E-3,4,5’-trihydroxy-3’-glucopyranosyl stilbene, showing [M-H]− at m/z 405.01, with a loss of 162 Da of glucose at m/z 243.02, and E-4,5’-dihydroxy-3-methoxy-3’-glucopyranosylstilbene, which showed [M-H]− at m/z 419.07.
Only one catechin was detected in EVME at m/z 289.07. Another detected compound in EVME was hinokitiol. It is a tropolone monoterpenoid derivative detected at m/z 163.07.
3.2. In Vitro Antifungal Activity
3.2.1. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing and Determination of MIC
A total of 12 C. glabrata clinical isolates were identified with microscopical examination and MALDI–TOF. In addition, EVME exhibited antifungal activity against the tested isolates using the agar well diffusion method. The MIC values of EVME were determined using the broth microdilution method, and they ranged from 32 to 256 µg/mL, as shown in Table S2.
3.2.2. Time–Kill Study
We observed that the count of CFU/mL of C. glabrata isolates declined by more than three log units when the isolates were incubated with EVME at concentrations of 1× MIC for two hours and 4× MIC for one hour. The isolates that exhibited this decline were 41.67% and 50%, respectively. A demonstrative illustration of this decline in the number of CFU/mL is revealed in Figure 2.
3.2.3. Nucleotide Leakage
The fungal cell membrane integrity was evaluated after treatment with EVME (using 0.5 MIC values). This was performed by detecting the discharge of the nucleic acid materials, which absorb at 260 nm, from the fungal cells. EVME was found to significantly decrease (p < 0.05) the membrane integrity of 41.67% of C. glabrata isolates. A representative illustration is revealed in Figure 3.
3.2.4. Sorbitol Protection Assay
Sorbitol protection assay was carried out to further study the impact of EVME on the fungal cell membrane. Interestingly, we noticed a substantial increase (p < 0.05) in the MIC values of EVME in the presence of sorbitol in 50% of the isolates, as shown in Figure 4.
3.2.5. Phenotypic and Genotypic Detection of the Impact of EVME on Efflux Pumps
The effects of EVME on the efflux activity of C. glabrata isolates were tested using the acridine orange test. It was observed that EVME resulted in a decrease in the percentage of the C. glabrata isolates having strong and moderate levels of efflux activity from 50% to 16.67%, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Efflux Pump Activity | No. of Isolates | |
---|---|---|
Before Treatment | After Treatment | |
Strong | 3 | 1 |
Moderate | 3 | 1 |
Weak | 4 | 6 |
None | 2 | 4 |
The impact of EVME on the efflux activity of C. glabrata isolates was studied in depth using qRT-PCR to elucidate the effect of EVME on the expression of the genes encoding efflux pumps. Interestingly, EVME was found to produce downregulation of the expression of CDR1, CDR2, and ERG11 genes in the tested isolates with percentages of 33.33%, 41.67%, and 33.33%, respectively, as shown in Figure 5.
3.3. In Vivo Antifungal Activity
3.3.1. Fungal Burden in the Kidney Tissues and Survival Rate
We counted the number of colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g) of the fungal cells in the kidney tissues in the tested experimental groups. EVME was found to reduce significantly (p < 0.05) the number of colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g) of fungal cells in kidneys, as shown in Figure 6.
Moreover, the survival curve was constructed, as shown in Figure 7. Two rats in group I died after two days, three rats died after four days, and the rest after one week. Only three rats died after one week in group II, and the rest remained alive till the 14th day. Only two rats died after six days in group III, and the other rats remained alive till the 14th day.
3.3.2. Kidney Function Test
Both blood urea and serum creatinine levels were determined in the three tested groups. As shown in Table 3, there were substantial increases (p < 0.05) in blood urea and serum creatinine levels in group I, compared with the other two groups.
Table 3.
Measured Parameter | Group I | Group II | Group III |
---|---|---|---|
Blood urea level (mg/dL) | 69 ± 1.40 * | 47.6 ± 1.10 | 48 ± 0.90 |
Serum creatinine level (mg/dL) | 0.95 ± 0.06 * | 0.7 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.06 |
The symbol * represents a significant difference from the other two groups (p < 0.05).
3.3.3. Histological Assessment
Kidney tissues from the different groups were examined for assessment of the effect of EVME on the kidney tissues of the rats infected with C. glabrata, as shown in Figure 8.
Collagen staining of the kidney tissues of the different groups using Masson’s trichrome stain is shown in Figure 9.
3.3.4. Immunohistochemical Studies
We accomplished immunostaining of the kidney tissues of the different groups using TNF-α, as shown in Figure 10.
4. Discussion
Candida spp. can cause opportunistic infections called candidiasis, which can occur in different parts of the body. When Candida spp. occur in the bloodstream, it is called candidemia, which has a very high mortality rate [34]. C. glabrata can cause both superficial and systemic infections, especially in immunocompromised patients [34]. Thus, in our study, we investigated the antifungal activity of EVME against C. glabrata clinical isolates in vitro and in vivo. Several researchers have reported the activity of certain plant extracts against candidiasis caused by different Candida spp. [35,36]. For instance, Bonifácio et al. [36] elucidated the effectiveness of plant extracts belonging to Astronium sp. against C. albicans. Additionally, Oliveira et al. elucidated the effectiveness of Myracrodruon urundeuva plant extract against Candida sp. [20]. However, most of the conducted research focused on C. albicans, and little attention has been given to C. glabrata. Nevertheless, infections caused by C. glabrata have increased in recent decades due to its growing resistance to azoles [1].
Medicinal plants have several secondary metabolites and bioactive compounds with various biological activities [37,38]. However, many of them remain unexplored yet. The antifungal effect of plant extracts is an important biological activity that should be investigated owing to the insufficiency of the currently present antifungal drugs. Many fungi, especially Candida spp., are acquiring resistance to antifungals. Additionally, many antifungals have various side effects, which restrict their use [39].
LC–ESI–MS/MS of EVME identified 51 molecules belonging to several phytochemical subclasses. This investigation revealed that EVME possesses antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities, which are likely due to the presence of several active constituents, such as phenolics, flavonoids, biflavonoids, and their glycoside derivatives, terpenoid, and coumarin derivatives [40,41,42,43]. According to peak height and area measurements, D-(−)-quinic acid is the principal acid present in EVME. Naringenin is the most abundant metabolite, followed by hesperetin and apigenin, while apigenin-7-O-glucoside is the most abundant flavonoid glycoside, followed by luteolin-7-O-glucoside.
The antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory of EVME were consistent with prior research on the anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties of certain flavonoids or flavonoid glycosides, such as apigenin, kaempferol, and luteolin derivatives [14,44,45], as well as naringenin [37], daidzein [46], biflavonoid derivatives [19,37,47,48], and coumarin derivatives [49,50].
Herein, EVME exhibited antifungal activity against C. glabrata clinical isolates with MIC values that ranged from 32 to 256 µg/mL. Therefore, we carried out time–kill studies to elucidate the pattern of growth and killing rate of the isolates by EVME [51,52]. This was performed to illustrate the dynamic interaction between EVME and C. glabrata isolates. In addition, the nucleotide leakage and sorbitol protection assays were carried out to reveal if EVME has an impact on the fungal cell membrane and cell wall.
There was a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the membrane integrity caused by EVME in 41.67% of C. glabrata isolates. This finding suggests that EVME could have a disruptive impact on the fungal cell membrane. The cell membrane of fungi is a target for certain antifungals. Thus, it was studied by many researchers [53,54]. In addition, the MIC values of EVME exhibited a significant rise (p < 0.05) in the presence of sorbitol in 50% of the isolates. Sorbitol has an osmoprotective property meaning that it can help cells with impaired cell walls to grow [18,55].
Efflux pumps are a common cause of fungi resistance to antifungals, and they are encoded by different genes [3]. Therefore, the impact of EVME on the efflux pump activity was studied, both phenotypically using acridine orange and genotypically [56]. qRT-PCR is an efficient, cost-effective, and relatively simple technique that can be used to quantify the expression of the genes [57,58]. Therefore, this technique was used to study the genotypic impact of EVME on the efflux genes. EVME resulted in a downregulation of CDR1, CDR2, and ERG11 genes in the tested isolates, with percentages of 33.33%, 41.67%, and 33.33%, respectively. Thus, EVME could be a promising source for efflux pump inhibitor compounds that can lead to decreasing the resistance to the antifungal drugs.
Regarding the in vivo model, we selected a systemic infection model for investigating the effectiveness of EVME against C. glabrata fungal isolates to mimic the actual real infection. Interestingly, EVME significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the number of CFU/g of fungal cells in kidney tissues and increased the infected rats’ survival rates. In addition, the kidney tissues were studied using histopathological and immunohistochemical investigations. We found that EVME resulted in average-sized glomeruli and tubules in comparison with group I. Moreover, it resulted in decreasing the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α, which has a role in the inflammatory process [11,59]. Regarding the collagen staining using Masson’s trichrome stain, it revealed a marked reduction in the abnormal collagen fibers deposition and protection of the kidney from pathological renal fibrosis.
5. Conclusions
LC–ESI–MS/MS contributed to the authentication of the investigated plant and identified 51 active constituents, including flavonoids, flavonoid glycosides, phenolic, carboxylic, and fatty acids, that were probably accountable for the E. villosus-exhibited effects. In addition, EVME revealed a promising antifungal activity against C. glabrata fungal isolates in vitro by disturbing the membrane integrity and cell wall and inhibiting the efflux pump activity by affecting its gene expression. Moreover, it exhibited antifungal activity in vivo by decreasing the congestion and production of average-sized glomeruli and tubules. It resulted in an improvement of the kidney function tests, with decreasing TNF-α and collagen fibers deposition.
As a final point, the current study highlighted E. villosus as a rich source of antifungal compounds. Therefore, more studies should be performed on EVME to isolate the pure active ingredients and to determine the compounds responsible for the activity. Additionally, preclinical and clinical studies should be performed to elucidate its effectiveness as a new antifungal agent.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8050521/s1. Table S1: Sequences of the utilized primers, Table S2: MIC values of EVME against the tested C. glabrata isolates, Figure S1: MS2 spectral fragmentation of all identified metabolites.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: E.E. and W.A.N.; data curation, M.J.A., E.E., W.A.N., I.A.H., and S.M.; formal analysis, M.J.A., E.E., W.A.N., and I.A.H.; investigation, M.J.A., E.E., W.A.N., and I.A.H.; methodology, M.J.A., E.E., W.A.N., and I.A.H.; software, E.E., W.A.N., and S.M.; validation M.J.A., I.A.H., and S.M.; visualization, M.J.A., E.E., W.A.N., and I.A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.A., E.E., W.A.N., and I.A.H.; writing—review and editing, M.J.A., E.E., W.A.N., S.M., and I.A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The experiment was carried out in accordance with the criteria for the care and use of laboratory animals, authorized by the Research Ethical Committee, Approval No (TP/RE/04-22-P-008).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no funding.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Arastehfar A., Gabaldón T., Garcia-Rubio R., Jenks J.D., Hoenigl M., Salzer H.J., Ilkit M., Lass-Flörl C., Perlin D.S. Drug-Resistant Fungi: An Emerging Challenge Threatening Our Limited Antifungal Armamentarium. Antibiotics. 2020;9:877. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Talapko J., Juzbašić M., Matijević T., Pustijanac E., Bekić S., Kotris I., Škrlec I. Candida albicans—The Virulence Factors and Clinical Manifestations of Infection. J. Fungi. 2021;7:79. doi: 10.3390/jof7020079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Holmes A.R., Cardno T.S., Strouse J.J., Ivnitski-Steele I., Keniya M.V., Lackovic K., Monk B.C., Sklar L.A., Cannon R.D. Targeting efflux pumps to overcome antifungal drug resistance. Future Med. Chem. 2016;8:1485–1501. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2016-0050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.El-Ganiny A.M., Kamel H.A., Yossef N.E., Mansour B., El-Baz A.M. Repurposing pantoprazole and haloperidol as efflux pump inhibitors in azole resistant clinical Candida albicans and non-albicans isolates. Saudi Pharm. J. 2022;30:245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Oliveira Santos G.C., Vasconcelos C.C., Lopes A.J., de Sousa Cartágenes M.D.S., Filho A.K., do Nascimento F.R., de Andrade Monteiro C. Candida Infections and Therapeutic Strategies: Mechanisms of Action for Traditional and Alternative Agents. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1351. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.El-Shahir A.A., El-Wakil D.A., Abdel Latef A.A.H., Youssef N.H. Bioactive Compounds and Antifungal Activity of Leaves and Fruits Methanolic Extracts of Ziziphus spina-christi L. Plants. 2022;11:746. doi: 10.3390/plants11060746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alhassan K.A., Indabawa A.S., Shah M.M. Phytochemical analysis, proximate composition and antibacterial activities of Ziziphus species (Z. jujube and Z. spina-christi) J. Appl. Adv. Res. 2019;4:42–46. doi: 10.21839/jaar.2019.v4i1.262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tungmunnithum D., Thongboonyou A., Pholboon A., Yangsabai A. Flavonoids and Other Phenolic Compounds from Medicinal Plants for Pharmaceutical and Medical Aspects: An Overview. Medicines. 2018;5:93. doi: 10.3390/medicines5030093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mahlo S.M., Chauke H.R., McGaw L., Eloff J. Antioxidant and antifungal activity of selected medicinal plant extracts against phytopathogenic fungi. Afr. J. Tradit. Complementary Altern. Med. 2016;13:216–222. doi: 10.21010/ajtcam.v13i4.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Treutlein J., Vorster P., Wink M. Molecular relationships in Encephalartos (Zamiaceae, Cycadales) based on nucleotide sequences of nuclear ITS 1&2, rbcL, and genomic ISSR fingerprinting. Plant Biol. 2005;7:79–90. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Negm W.A., El-Aasr M., Attia G., Alqahtani M.J., Yassien R.I., Abo Kamer A., Elekhnawy E. Promising Antifungal Activity of Encephalartos laurentianus de Wild against Candida albicans Clinical Isolates: In Vitro and In Vivo Effects on Renal Cortex of Adult Albino Rats. J. Fungi. 2022;8:426. doi: 10.3390/jof8050426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Temraz A. Novel illudalane sesquiterpenes from Encephalartos villosus Lehm. antimicrobial activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016;30:2791–2797. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1160236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Negm W.A., El-Kadem A.H., Elekhnawy E., Attallah N.G., Al-Hamoud G.A., El-Masry T.A., Zayed A. Wound-Healing Potential of Rhoifolin-Rich Fraction Isolated from Sanguisorba officinalis Roots Supported by Enhancing Re-Epithelization, Angiogenesis, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antimicrobial Effects. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:178. doi: 10.3390/ph15020178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alotaibi B., Mokhtar F.A., El-Masry T.A., Elekhnawy E., Mostafa S.A., Abdelkader D.H., Elharty M.E., Saleh A., Negm W.A. Antimicrobial Activity of Brassica rapa L. Flowers Extract on Gastrointestinal Tract Infections and Antiulcer Potential Against Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Ulcer in Rats Supported by Metabolomics Profiling. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021;14:7411. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S345780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Attallah N.G.M., Negm W.A., Elekhnawy E., Elmongy E.I., Altwaijry N., El-Haroun H., El-Masry T.A., El-Sherbeni S.A. Elucidation of Phytochemical Content of Cupressus macrocarpa Leaves: In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Effect against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates. Antibiotics. 2021;10:890. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10080890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alotaibi B., Negm W.A., Elekhnawy E., El-Masry T.A., Elseady W.S., Saleh A., Alotaibi K.N., El-Sherbeni S.A. Antibacterial, Immunomodulatory, and Lung Protective Effects of Boswelliadalzielii Oleoresin Ethanol Extract in Pulmonary Diseases: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Antibiotics. 2021;10:1444. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. CLSI Supplement M60 2017. [(accessed on 2 January 2022)]. Available online: https://clsi.org/media/1895/m60ed1_sample.pdf.
- 18.Lemos A.S.O., Florêncio J.R., Pinto N.C.C., Campos L.M., Silva T.P., Grazul R.M., Pinto P.F., Tavares G.D., Scio E., Apolônio A.C.M., et al. Antifungal Activity of the Natural Coumarin Scopoletin Against Planktonic Cells and Biofilms from a Multidrug-Resistant Candida tropicalis Strain. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1525. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Negm W.A., Abo El-Seoud K.A., Kabbash A., Kassab A.A., El-Aasr M. Hepatoprotective, cytotoxic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Dioon spinulosum leaves Dyer Ex Eichler and its isolated secondary metabolites. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021;35:5166–5176. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2020.1789636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khudhair D.H., Al-Gareeb A.I., Al-Kuraishy H.M., El-Kadem A.H., Elekhnawy E., Negm W.A., Saber S., Cavalu S., Tirla A., Alotaibi S.S. Combination of Vitamin C and Curcumin Safeguards against Methotrexate-Induced Acute Liver Injury in Mice by Synergistic Antioxidant Effects. Front. Med. 2022;9:866343. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.866343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Salgado F.L., Artigiani-Neto R., Lopes-Filho G.d.J. Growth factors and COX2 in wound healing: An experimental study with Ehrlich tumors. ABCD. Arq. Bras. De Cir. Dig. (São Paulo) 2016;29:223–226. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201600040003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Al Kadhi O., Melchini A., Mithen R., Saha S. Development of a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates in a range of biological matrices. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2017;2017:5391832. doi: 10.1155/2017/5391832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Avula B., Wang Y.-H., Smillie T.J., Khan I.A. Determination of shikimic acid in fruits of Illicium species and various other plant samples by LC–UV and LC–ESI–MS. Chromatographia. 2009;69:307–314. doi: 10.1365/s10337-008-0884-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ruan J., Yan J., Zheng D., Sun F., Wang J., Han L., Zhang Y., Wang T. Comprehensive chemical profiling in the ethanol extract of Pluchea indica aerial parts by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of its silica gel column chromatography fractions. Molecules. 2019;24:2784. doi: 10.3390/molecules24152784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bosco R., Daeseleire E., Van Pamel E., Scariot V., Leus L. Development of an ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and abscisic acid in rose leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:6278–6284. doi: 10.1021/jf5023884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Serrano C.A., Villena G.K., Rodríguez E.F. Phytochemical profile and rosmarinic acid purification from two Peruvian Lepechinia Willd. species (Salviinae, Mentheae, Lamiaceae) Sci. Rep. 2021;11:7260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86692-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yuan Y., Hou W., Tang M., Luo H., Chen L.-J., Guan Y.H., Sutherland I.A. Separation of flavonoids from the leaves of Oroxylum indicum by HSCCC. Chromatographia. 2008;68:885–892. doi: 10.1365/s10337-008-0859-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.El Sayed A.M., Basam S.M., Marzouk H.S., El-Hawary S. LC–MS/MS and GC–MS profiling as well as the antimicrobial effect of leaves of selected Yucca species introduced to Egypt. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:17778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74440-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiao Y., Hu Z., Yin Z., Zhou Y., Liu T., Zhou X., Chang D. Profiling and distribution of metabolites of procyanidin B2 in mice by UPLC-DAD-ESI-IT-TOF-MSn technique. Front. Pharmacol. 2017;8:231. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carvalho A.A., dos Santos L.R., de Freitas J.S., de Sousa R.P., de Farias R.R.S., Júnior G.M.V., Rai M., Chaves M.H. First report of flavonoids from leaves of Machaerium acutifolium by DI-ESI-MS/MS. Arab. J. Chem. 2022;15:103765. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yuzuak S., Ballington J., Xie D.-Y. HPLC-qTOF-MS/MS-based profiling of flavan-3-ols and dimeric proanthocyanidins in berries of two muscadine grape hybrids FLH 13-11 and FLH 17-66. Metabolites. 2018;8:57. doi: 10.3390/metabo8040057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aouadi K., Hajlaoui H., Arraouadi S., Ghannay S., Snoussi M., Kadri A. HPLC/MS Phytochemical Profiling with Antioxidant Activities of Echium humile Desf. Extracts: ADMET Prediction and Computational Study Targeting Human Peroxiredoxin 5 Receptor. Agronomy. 2021;11:2165. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Šibul F., Orčić D., Berežni S., Anačkov G., Mimica-Dukić N. HPLC–MS/MS profiling of wild-growing scentless chamomile. Acta Chromatographica. 2020;32:86–94. doi: 10.1556/1326.2019.00546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Carolus H., Van Dyck K., Van Dijck P. Candida albicans and Staphylococcus species: A threatening twosome. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2162. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Oliveira F.A., Rorato V.C., Almeida-Apolonio A.A., Rodrigues A.B., Barros A.L., Sangalli A., Arena A.C., Mota J.S., Grisolia A.B., Oliveira K.M.D. In vitro antifungal activity of Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão against human vaginal Candida species. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2017;89:2423–2432. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720170254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bonifácio B.V., dos Santos Ramos M.A., da Silva P.B., Negri K.M.S., de Oliveira Lopes É., de Souza L.P., Vilegas W., Pavan F.R., Chorilli M., Bauab T.M. Nanostructured lipid system as a strategy to improve the anti-Candida albicans activity of Astronium sp. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015;10:5081. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S79684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Negm W.A., El-Aasr M., Kamer A.A., Elekhnawy E. Investigation of the Antibacterial Activity and Efflux Pump Inhibitory Effect of Cycas thouarsii R. Br. Extract against Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:756. doi: 10.3390/ph14080756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Elekhnawy E., Negm W.A., El-Aasr M., Kamer A.A., Alqarni M., Batiha G.E.-S., Obaidullah A.J., Fawzy H.M. Histological assessment, anti-quorum sensing, and anti-biofilm activities of Dioon spinulosum extract: In vitro and in vivo approach. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03953-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaur N., Bains A., Kaushik R., Dhull S.B., Melinda F., Chawla P. A Review on Antifungal Efficiency of Plant Extracts Entrenched Polysaccharide-Based Nanohydrogels. Nutrients. 2021;13:2055. doi: 10.3390/nu13062055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ayoub I.M., Korinek M., Hwang T.-L., Chen B.-H., Chang F.-R., El-Shazly M., Singab A.N.B. Probing the antiallergic and anti-inflammatory activity of biflavonoids and dihydroflavonols from Dietes bicolor. J. Nat. Prod. 2018;81:243–253. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Serafini M., Peluso I., Raguzzini A. Flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010;69:273–278. doi: 10.1017/S002966511000162X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maleki S.J., Crespo J.F., Cabanillas B. Anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoids. Food Chem. 2019;299:125124. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grover J., Jachak S.M. Coumarins as privileged scaffold for anti-inflammatory drug development. RSC Adv. 2015;5:38892–38905. doi: 10.1039/C5RA05643H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Qian W., Liu M., Fu Y., Zhang J., Liu W., Li J., Li X., Li Y., Wang T. Antimicrobial mechanism of luteolin against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes and its antibiofilm properties. Microb. Pathog. 2020;142:104056. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Attallah N.G., El-Sherbeni S.A., El-Kadem A.H., Elekhnawy E., El-Masry T.A., Elmongy E.I., Altwaijry N., Negm W.A. Elucidation of the Metabolite Profile of Yucca gigantea and Assessment of its Cytotoxic, Antimicrobial, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Molecules. 2022;27:1329. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Buchmann D., Schultze N., Borchardt J., Böttcher I., Schaufler K., Guenther S. Synergistic antimicrobial activities of epigallocatechin gallate, myricetin, daidzein, gallic acid, epicatechin, 3-hydroxy-6-methoxyflavone and genistein combined with antibiotics against ESKAPE pathogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022;132:949–963. doi: 10.1111/jam.15253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Negm W., Abo El-Seoud K., Kabbash A., El-Aasr M. Investigation of the Biological Activity Some Gymnosperm Plants Belong to Cycadales Order. J. Adv. Med. Pharm. Res. 2020;1:9–13. doi: 10.21608/jampr.2020.23512.1002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Elmongy E.I., Negm W.A., Elekhnawy E., El-Masry T.A., Attallah N.G., Altwaijry N., Batiha G.E.-S., El-Sherbeni S.A. Antidiarrheal and Antibacterial Activities of Monterey Cypress Phytochemicals: In Vivo and In Vitro Approach. Molecules. 2022;27:346. doi: 10.3390/molecules27020346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Patel J. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial screening of some furofused coumarines. Int. J. Adv. Res. Dev. 2018;3:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Widelski J., Luca S.V., Skiba A., Chinou I., Marcourt L., Wolfender J.-L., Skalicka-Wozniak K. Isolation and antimicrobial activity of coumarin derivatives from fruits of Peucedanum luxurians Tamamsch. Molecules. 2018;23:1222. doi: 10.3390/molecules23051222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Öz Y., Özdemir H.G., Gökbolat E., Kiraz N., Ilkit M., Seyedmousavi S. Time-Kill Kinetics and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Non-fumigatus Aspergillus Species Isolated from Patients with Ocular Mycoses. Mycopathologia. 2016;181:225–233. doi: 10.1007/s11046-015-9969-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Attallah N.G., Negm W.A., Elekhnawy E., Altwaijry N., Elmongy E.I., El-Masry T.A., Alturki E.A., Yousef D.A., Shoukheba M.Y. Antibacterial Activity of Boswellia sacra Flueck. Oleoresin Extract against Porphyromonas gingivalis Periodontal Pathogen. Antibiotics. 2021;10:859. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10070859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Huang F., Kong J., Ju J., Zhang Y., Guo Y., Cheng Y., Qian H., Xie Y., Yao W. Membrane damage mechanism contributes to inhibition of trans-cinnamaldehyde on Penicillium italicum using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) Sci. Rep. 2019;9:490. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36989-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fischer D., Gessner G., Fill T.P., Barnett R., Tron K., Dornblut K., Kloss F., Stallforth P., Hube B., Heinemann S.H. Disruption of membrane integrity by the bacterium-derived antifungal jagaricin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00707-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00707-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Elekhnawy E.A., Sonbol F.I., Elbanna T.E., Abdelaziz A.A. Evaluation of the impact of adaptation of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates to benzalkonium chloride on biofilm formation. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2021;22:51. doi: 10.1186/s43042-021-00170-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Elekhnawy E., Sonbol F., Abdelaziz A., Elbanna T. An investigation of the impact of triclosan adaptation on Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates from an Egyptian university hospital. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021;52:927–937. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00485-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kralik P., Ricchi M. A Basic Guide to Real Time PCR in Microbial Diagnostics: Definitions, P., and Everything. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:108. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Attallah N.G., Elekhnawy E., Negm W.A., Hussein I.A., Mokhtar F.A., Al-Fakhrany O.M. In Vivo and In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:194. doi: 10.3390/ph15020194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang W.-Y., Tan M.-S., Yu J.-T., Tan L. Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 2015;3:136. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.