Skip to main content
Materials logoLink to Materials
. 2022 May 11;15(10):3461. doi: 10.3390/ma15103461

Management of Solid Waste Containing Fluoride—A Review

Małgorzata Olejarczyk 1,2, Iwona Rykowska 1, Włodzimierz Urbaniak 1,*
Editor: Igor Cretescu
PMCID: PMC9147173  PMID: 35629486

Abstract

Technological and economic development have influenced the amount of post-production waste. Post-industrial waste, generated in the most considerable amount, includes, among others, waste related to the mining, metallurgical, and energy industries. Various non-hazardous or hazardous wastes can be used to produce new construction materials after the “solidification/stabilization” processes. They can be used as admixtures or raw materials. However, the production of construction materials from various non-hazardous or hazardous waste materials is still very limited. In our opinion, special attention should be paid to waste containing fluoride, and the reuse of solid waste containing fluoride is a high priority today. Fluoride is one of the few trace elements that has received much attention due to its harmful effects on the environment and human and animal health. In addition to natural sources, industry, which discharges wastewater containing F− ions into surface waters, also increases fluoride concentration in waters and pollutes the environment. Therefore, developing effective and robust technologies to remove fluoride excess from the aquatic environment is becoming extremely important. This review aims to cover a wide variety of procedures that have been used to remove fluoride from drinking water and industrial wastewater. In addition, the ability to absorb fluoride, among others, by industrial by-products, agricultural waste, and biomass materials were reviewed.

Keywords: solidification/stabilisation, fluoride removal, defluorination techniques, adsorption, industrial waste

1. Introduction

According to the circular economy principles, issues related to the correct and effective management of production waste are currently among the fundamental problems [1,2,3].

The following article comprehensively presents various materials used to neutralize fluorine ions, including waste materials. Moreover, a new material proposed by the authors was presented here, which is made of two industrial waste materials that form a sorbent for fluorine adsorption, and after use, it can be used in building material.

Environmental pollution due to the mismanagement of solid waste is a global problem. Many publications on specific waste streams have been published in the scientific literature to quantify their environmental impact [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. N. Ferronato [10], in a review work, assessed the global problems associated with various waste materials, pointing out how they affect the environment, what their relation is to human health, and how they influence sustainable development. The results shown by the authors provide a reference point for scientists and stakeholders to quantify comprehensive effects and plan integrated solid waste collection and treatment systems to make it easier to achieve sustainable development at the global level [10].

The efficient management and further utilization of waste materials becomes a significant problem for the industry and is growing as the amount of waste materials is increasing, and management costs are rising for both the industry and local administrations [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Therefore, recycling and reusing industrial waste and by-products are of great importance [20,21,22,23]. In fact, in reducing environmental problems and increasing economic benefits, there is a great need for technologies to transform waste materials into products of commercial value [24,25,26,27,28,29].

For example, some waste materials are converted in the scope of solidification and stabilization (S/S) processes. The solidification aids in changing the physical state of waste, from a liquid to a solid material, by encapsulation, thus decreasing the level of migration to the environment. The stabilization, by applications of some chemical reactions, migrates dangerous materials to less soluble or less toxic forms [30].

There are several S/S processes and methods proposed, tested, and implemented in practice [31,32,33,34]. These solutions, however, still need a lot of research to increase their effectiveness/performance and long-term effects [31]. The massive usage of S/S products, e.g., as construction materials, is still blocked by the potential risk of migrating the contaminants to the environment, including the toxic materials. New research, however, points out low leachability factors, which indicates that the S/S waste (contaminant source) can be regarded as an environmentally sustainable material with potential beneficial uses in construction [35].

Therefore, research and development is needed for the wide production and utilization of construction materials from various nonhazardous or hazardous waste materials [36].

In our opinion, special attention should be paid to waste containing fluoride, and the reuse of solid waste containing fluoride is a high priority today.

As one of the most extended elements on earth [37], fluorine (F) is widely used in the chemical industry, which in turn has produced large amounts of fluorine-containing hazardous waste. Fluoride, which is the most electro-negative element in the halogen family, is considered to be one of the main environmental pollutants due to its low biodegradability, high reactivity, and popularity [38]. One of the sources of introducing fluoride into the environment is the industry, which discharges sewage containing F− ions to surface waters and contributes to an increase in the concentration of fluoride in waters and environmental pollution [39].

Fluoride is one of the few trace elements that has received much attention due to its harmful effects on the environment and human and animal health [40,41,42,43]. Sabine [44] Guth et al. reviewed the available literature to critically assess the risks to human health from fluoride exposure, with a focus on developmental toxicity. Several factors, such as pH, alkalinity, chemical composition of aquifers, hardness, etc., determine the presence and concentration of fluoride in water resources [45,46,47,48,49,50,51].

Table 1 summarizes the review publications that have been published over the past decade on fluoride removal from both drinking and industrial wastewater, followed by the impact of fluoride waste to the environment and human health, and finally defluorination techniques. It presents the state of the art in the field of fluorinated waste management in one place. Moreover, it summarizes most of the techniques already proposed. The effectiveness of various materials for fluoride removal has been reviewed, taking into account key factors such as pH, initial fluorine concentration, surface area, particle size, and temperature, as well as the occurrence of counterions influencing the process of defluorination [39,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62].

Table 1.

A summary of review publications that have been published over the past decade on the removal of fluoride from drinking water and industrial wastewater.

Authors Title Aim
Habuda-Stanić M. et al., 2014
[52]
Review on Adsorption of Fluoride from Aqueous Solution A list of various adsorbents (oxides and hydroxides, biosorbents, geomaterials, carbonaceous materials, and industrial by-products) and their modifications is discussed. This survey showed that various adsorbents, especially binary and trimetal oxides and hydroxides, have good potential for fluoride removal from aquatic environments.
Waghmare S.S. et al., 2015
[53]
Fluoride removal by industrial, agricultural and biomass wastes as adsorbents: a review Reviews the fluoride uptake capacities of industrial by-products, agricultural wastes, and biomass materials from plants, grass, etc., and their modified forms as adsorbents in batch and column performance.
Tomar V. et al., 2013
[54]
A critical study on efficiency of different materials for fluoride removal from aqueous media An extensive list of adsorbents for fluoride removal is compiled. In particular, nanomaterial-based adsorbents might be promising adsorbents for environmental and purification purposes.
Kumar P.S., 2019
[39]
Treatment of fluoride-contaminated water: a review Reviews the origin of fluoride, the analysis of fluoride derivatives, and the technologies to remove fluoride from water, using different adsorbent types.
Nagendra Rao C.R. 2003
[58]
Fluoride and environment—a review Current information on fluoride presence in the environment and its effects on human health, as well as basic methods of defluoridation.
Schlesinger W.H. et al., 2020
[59]
Global Biogeochemical Cycle of Fluorine Synthesis of what is currently known about the natural and anthropogenic fluxes of fluorine.
He J. et al., 2020
[60]
Review of fluoride removal from water environment by adsorption The recent developments in fluoride removal from the water environment by adsorption methods. Based on the review, four technical strategies of adsorption method, including nano-surface effect, structural memory effect, anti-competitive adsorption, and ionic sieve effect, were proposed.
Bhatnagar A. et al., 2011
[61]
Fluoride removal from water by adsorption—a review An extensive list of various adsorbents from literature has been compiled, and their adsorption capacities under various conditions (pH, initial fluoride concentration, temperature, contact time, adsorbent surface charge, etc.) for fluoride removal are presented.
Bodzek M. et al., 2018
[39]
Fluorine in the Water Environment-Hazards and Removal Methods, Engineering and Protection of Environment Detailed information on recent researchers’ efforts in the field of fluoride removal during potable water production. The contaminant elimination methods have been broadly divided in three sections, i.e., coagulation/precipitation, adsorption, and membrane techniques. Both precipitation with the use of calcium salts or coagulation with aluminium sulphate and ferric salts followed by sedimentation are used for fluorine removal. In electrocoagulation, a coagulant is generated in situ by means of oxidation of anode usually made of aluminium or iron.
Wang L. et al.
2019
[62]
A Review on Comprehensive Utilization of Red Mud and Prospect Analysis Comprehensive utilization methods for reducing red mud (RM) environmental pollution and divides the comprehensive utilization of RM into three aspects: the effective extraction of valuable components, resource transformation, and environmental application.

Natural and anthropogenic processes contribute to the release of fluorine compounds into the environment, causing the fluoride concentration in the soil to be much higher than the limit values, which is further followed by health and environmental problems in many regions of the world.

2. Anthropogenic Sources of Contamination with Fluorine Compounds

In many countries around the world, high levels of fluoride are the result of discharges of sewage polluted with fluoride [52].

Such wastewater is usually produced by industry: superphosphate fertilizers [63,64,65]; glass and ceramics production processes [66,67]; aluminium and zinc smelters [68,69,70]; steel production; uranium enrichment plants; coal-fired power plants; beryllium extraction plants; oil refineries [61,69,70,71,72]; the photovoltaic solar cell industry [61,73,74,75,76,77,78]; the production of high-tech silicon-based semiconductors [61,75,76,77,78]; and municipal waste incineration plants through HF emissions caused by the incineration of fluorinated plastics, fluorinated textiles, or CaF2 in sludge [79]. Fluorine is also used in electroplating. In addition, it is used as a melting point depressant in metallurgical furnaces in the smelting process. Water from mines can be a significant source of fluoride.

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFS) have been used extensively as gas in deodorants and coolants in refrigerators. However, due to their destructive effect on the ozone layer, some of these compounds are withdrawn from use. Fluoride also migrates to the environment due to the use of pesticides (e.g., cyhalothrin, fenfluthrin, and tefluthrin) [21]. It is also liberated into the environment in the brick production process [76].

It is estimated that about 30% of pharmaceuticals (including antibiotics, antidepressants, drugs against asthma, and atresia) are based on fluoride. The next big emitters of fluoride are cooling gases used in air conditioning, ventilation, and cooling devices contain fluorine in their composition [80,81]. Fluor is released into the atmosphere by burning hard coal, brown coal, and fuel oil. Then, industrial dust containing soluble fluorides and gaseous compounds (including HF) is emitted [82]. Wastewater from these industries has a higher F− concentration than natural waters, starting from ten thousand mg/L, and in the case of phosphate production, fluoride concentrations in wastewater can reach up to 3000 mg/L [83].

The combustion of biomass releases fluoride into the atmosphere, which is the main stream of this atmospheric pollutant, which has not been characterized before. The emission of fine particles (PM 2.5) of water-soluble fluorine (F−) from the biomass combustion was assessed at the Fourth Fire Laboratory in Missoula Experiment (FLAME-IV) using X-ray energy dispersive scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDX) and ion chromatography with conductivity detection. Based on recent assessments of global biomass combustion, they estimated that biomass combustion releases 76 Gg F− per year into the atmosphere, with an upper and lower limit of 40–150 Gg F− per year. The estimated F− flux from biomass combustion is comparable to fluoride emission from coal combustion and other anthropogenic sources. These data show that biomass combustion is the primary source of fluoride released into the atmosphere in the form of fine particles that can be transported over long distances [37].

As the aforementioned fluoride-originated pollutants raise several health problems, the World Health Organization (WHO) determined the acceptable level of fluoride content in drinking water at the level of 1.5 mg/L [45]. However, the concentration of fluorides in industrial wastewater mostly exceeds these WHO guidelines, reaching even thousands of milligrams per litre [40,84,85]. Thus, fluoride pollution in the aquatic environment, caused by natural and artificial activities, has been a significant problem worldwide. Searching for new, effective ways to remove of fluoride-originated waste from water seems to be very important [60].

3. Selected Types of Reagents for Fluoride Removal

Several conventional techniques may be pointed here, such as adsorption [61,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,86,87,88,89,90,91], chemical precipitation [86,92], coagulation and precipitation methods [72,93,94,95,96,97,98,99], ion exchange [100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111], and electrocoagulation [69,77,86,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123], as well as more advanced membrane processes [83,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131], reverse osmosis [132,133,134], and electrochemical treatment [69,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123]. In general, such compounds as CaCl2 and CaO are added to precipitate fluoride in wastewater.

Each method has its advantages and limitations and can be operated with the appropriate efficiency provided that the process parameters are properly selected to remove fluoride in the appropriate concentration range [26,31,122].

Large-scale industrial operations generate vast amounts of waste, the management of which can be a serious problem. An interesting possibility is to convert such waste into sorbents used for the water defluorination. Then, industrial waste becomes an adsorbent to remove fluoride from aqueous solutions [29]. Figure 1 shows selected types of industrial waste that are used as such adsorbents.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Selected types of industrial waste that are used as fluoride adsorbents.

Among the various methods of water defluorination (as mentioned earlier), adsorption is the most commonly used technique to remove fluoride. Fluorine is adsorbed on a barrier composed of a resin and some mineral particles. This method is efficient, simple, and cheap. These factors are especially important for developing countries [7,28,102]. The adsorbents may be also based on the biomass from plants, even being an agricultural waste, and several industrial by-products. These inexpensive materials help replace an expensive commercial adsorbent such as activated carbon, which again has a regeneration problem. Agricultural and industrial waste materials are available in massive amounts, Some of them are inexpensive and biodegradable, and thus environmentally friendly [123].

A wide range of adsorbents and their modifications were tested to remove fluoride from water [26]. These include activated carbon [83,124,125,126,127,128], activated alumina [129,130,131,132,135], bauxite [53,131,133,134,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151], hematite [137,152,153,154,155,156], polymer resins [94,138,139,157], activated rice husk [125,140,141,158], brick powder [142], pumice stone [143,159,160,161], red earth, charcoal, brick, fly ash, serpentine [144,162,163,164,165], Moringa oleifera seed extracts [166], granular ceramics [167], chitin, chitosan and alginate [135,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,155,156,168,169,170,171,172,173,174], modified iron oxide/hydroxide [175,176,177,178,179,180,181], hydroxyapatite (HAP) [182,183,184,185,186], zirconium-modified materials and ceremonies [58,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197], titanium adsorbent [198,199,200], schwertmannite [201], modified cellulose [202,203], clays [165,204,205,206,207], zeolite [57,208,209,210,211,212,213], and magnesium modified sorbent [106,118,202,214].

4. Industrial Waste, By-Product, and Biomass as Fluoride Adsorbents

Red mud is waste produced by the aluminium industry during alkaline processing, namely by the so-called Bayer process. The red sludge is strongly alkaline. The use of industrial wastes such as red sludge for defluorination will significantly reduce their volume for the problem of land removal, soil and groundwater contamination, and landscaping for alternative uses [53].

The removal of fluoride from water using red mud granular according to batch and column adsorption techniques is described by Tor et al. [215]. Cengeloglu et al. [165] have studied defluoridation by using red mud as such and acid-treated red mud by 5.5 M HCl for drinking purposes, and Wei et al. [216] have used modified red mud with AlCl3 (MRMA) and further modified by heat-activated red mud (MRMAH) as an adsorbent for the removal of fluoride from water. Lv et al. [217] have investigated zirconium hydroxide modified red mud porous material to remove fluoride from aqueous solutions. Soni et al. [218] have studied red mud for defluoridation of water collected from the Sitapura Industrial Area, Jaipur (Rajasthan). The results of a study to remove fluoride from red mud by electrokinetic treatment and the feasibility of this technique were presented by Zhu et al. [219].

All authors reported promising results in removing fluoride. Waste mud was recently found as one of the most promising adsorbents due to its extremely low cost and wide availability. This waste is an untapped resource and, in some cases, presents serious disposal problems, so using waste sludge to remove contaminants is an important application. The authors [220] tested three different forms of waste sludge for their fluoride removal efficiency: primary sludge, acid-treated sludge, and precipitated waste sludge [220]. The precipitated waste sludge showed a higher yield than the others [52].

Sujana et al. [221] investigated the defluorination limit of alum sludge, a waste product of the bauxite alum production process by adding sulfuric acid, which mainly contains aluminium oxide and titanium with a small number of undecomposed silicates. Nigussie et al. [222] investigated the removal of fluoride using the sludge formed during aluminium sulphate production (alum) from kaolin in the sulfuric acid process.

The potential of fluoride adsorption in drinking water treated with spent bleaching earth (SBE) was investigated by Mahramanlioglu et al. [223]. SBE is a solid waste generated during oil processing, as it contains mainly residual oil not removed by filter pressing. SBE applications were found very efficient [224] to adsorb fluorine from water in one of the Iran regions at concentrations ranging from 2.28 and 5.4 mg/L, pH 7, and processing time about 180 min [38].

Fly ash or coal ash, also known as UK Powdered Fuel Ash or Carbon Combustion Residue (CCR), is the product of coal combustion that consists of solid particles (fine particles of burnt fuel) that are driven from coal boilers along with exhaust fumes. The ash that falls to the bottom of the boiler combustion chamber (colloquially called the furnace) is called bottom ash. Singh et al. [53] have studied the defluoridation of groundwater of Agra city by means of fly ash (ATF).

The batch adsorption capacity of fly ash has been studied by Nemade [225]. He observed that fluoride adsorption decreased continuously between pH 2 to 12. Xue [226] observed that the high pH of the solution caused a slight turbidity of the filtered water, the effectiveness of defluorination increases with the increase of fluoride concentration in the inflow, and both the amount of sifted water and the effectiveness of the defluorination increase with an increasing temperature. Geethamani et al. [227] used calcium hydroxide-treated fly ash (CFA) to remove fluoride in a batch study. The removal of more than 80% was achieved with a 10 mg/L fluoride solution with an equilibrium contact time of 120 min and a dose of 3 g/L CFA. The maximum removal of fluoride was at pH 7 [53].

Ramesh et al. [228] investigated the ability to remove bottom ash fluoride in batch and column modes. Thus, 73.5% fluoride removal was achieved with a bottom ash dose of 70 mg/100 mL with an optimal contact time of 105 min. The maximum removal efficiency of 83.2% was observed at pH 6.

Zhang et al., in their work [229], characterized the mechanisms of the detoxification of water-soluble fluoride in bottom ash and the decomposition of fluorine during the combustion of spent potting material (SPL) in response to four calcium compounds CaSiO3, CaO, Ca(OH)2, and CaCO3, which converted NaF into low toxicity compounds, with a conversion range at the level of 54.24–99.45%.

The cenosphere is a light, inert, hollow sphere made mainly of silica and aluminium oxide, filled with air or an inert gas, usually produced as a by-product of coal combustion in thermal power stations. Xu et al. [230] investigated fluoride removal using magnesium-loaded fly ash cenospheres (MLC) prepared by the wet impregnation of fly ash cenospheres with a magnesium chloride solution.

The removal of fluoride with aluminium hydroxide-coated rice husk ash was investigated Ganvir et al. [183]. Rice husk ash is obtained by burning rice husk ash and unshelled husk, the latter two being relatively cheap and massively produced materials. Mondal et al. [231] investigated the capacity of activated rice husk ash (ARHA) by washing and drying rice husk ash from a rice mill at 100 °C for 8 h in an electric furnace and further crushing into 250 μm particles. The fluoride adsorption capacity of such obtained adsorbent was 15.08 mg/g in the batch and 9.5 mg/g in the column test.

Aluminium Treated Bagasse Fly ash (ABF) treated with aluminium for drinking water defluorination with an initial fluorine concentration of 1–10 mg/L, with a sorbent dose range of 1–20 g/L at pH 6.0 were tested by Gupta et al. [232].

Jadhav et al. [233] used maize husk fly ash as an adsorbent for eliminating fluoride from water, with the efficiency reaching 86% at a pH value of 2 and reaction time about two hours.

Waste carbon slurry for fluoride removal was investigated by Gupta et al. [234]. This compound is obtained from fuel oil-based generators of the fertilizer industry. The maximum fluoride adsorption capacity was reported at a level of 4.861 mg/g, with a reaction time of about one hour and pH equal to 7–8.

The ability of the adsorbent produced from coal-mining waste to remove fluoride from an aqueous solution was investigated by CInarli et al. [235]. The optimal pH for the reaction was found at the level of 3.5. To the same goal, Kumari et al. [236] used shale (coal mine waste) as a native shell (NS) adsorbent and heat-activated shale (HAS) at various temperatures ranging from 350 °C to 550 °C.

Islam et al. [237] investigated the basic oxygen furnace slag, produced by the steel industry, to remove fluoride from water. Basic converter slag (BOFS) mainly contains 46.5% CaO, 16.7% iron oxide, 13.8% SiO2, and some other components. The thermal activation of BOFS (TABOFS) by heating at 1000 °C for 24 h increased the porosity and surface area, leading to increased fluoride adsorption and resulting in fluoride removal at the level of 93% (in comparison with initial 70%).

Lai and Liu [238] used a spent catalyst (a by-product of the petrochemical industry) to remove fluoride from aquatic environments. This compound consists mainly of porous silica and alumina, and it is efficient enough to remove fluoride. Tsai and Lui [239] examined spent iron-coated catalyst by coating 0.1 and 0.5 M Fe(NO3)3 to remove fluoride from an aqueous solution. Fluoride adsorption decreased with an increasing pH. The fluoride adsorption reaction was endothermic, and the rate of reaction increased with temperature.

Bauxite is a basic source of such metals as aluminium and gallium. It is a sedimentary rock with a relatively high aluminium content. Das et al. [240] used a thermally activated titanium-rich bauxite (TRB) for the removal of the fluoride excess from drinking water. Lavecchia et al. [154] investigated bauxite with a high alumina content (81.5%) to remove fluoride from contaminated water. The percent removal of bauxite from fluoride in the pretest was 38.5%. Chaudhari [241] used bauxite to defluoridation water. It was observed that the optimal dose of the adsorbent was 1.8 g/50 mL, while the process took 90 min at the optimum pH of 6.0.

Bibi et al. used hydrated cement, brick dust, and marble flour to de-fluorine and remove arsenic from the water. The presence of co-anions did not significantly affect the effectiveness of arsenic and fluoride removal [53]. Kang et al. [242] investigated Cement Paste for removing fluoride as a low-cost solution. The cement paste was competitive with lime, the prevalent fluoride-removing agent [52].

Zhang et al. [186] investigated the possibility of removing fluoride using recycled phosphogypsum. The latter was applied in the form of HAP nanoparticles using microwave radiation technology [52].

Oguz used lightweight concrete (building material) [243] as an adsorbent to remove fluoride from water, and its effectiveness was tested. The maximum adsorption of fluoride took place at pH 6.9. Additionally, hydrated cement [244] and hardened alumina cement [245] were tested to remove fluoride from an aqueous solution. Various forms of apatite have been used to remove fluoride because it has shown good defluorination prospects, namely synthetic nano-hydroxyapatite (n-Hap), biogenic apatite, processed biogenic apatite, and geogenic apatite [246]. The fluoride adsorption was determined to decrease with increasing concentration levels and pH value. Ultrasonic and microwave treatment also increased the effectiveness of the fluoride removal process [247,248]. The influence of low molecular weight organic acids (LMWOA) on the defluoridation capacity of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAP) from an aqueous solution was investigated [249]. Cellulose nanocomposites @ hydroxyapatite (HA) were prepared in NaOH/thiourea/urea/H2O by in situ hybridization [203]. Aluminium-modified hydroxyapatite (Al-HAP) was also used for defluoridation [250]. High-purity phosphogypsum (PG) nanoparticles were also used, showing an excellent fluoride adsorption capacity [54,186].

Waste clay brick (WCB) is a silicate solid waste, the recycling of which is of significant environmental and social importance. WCB is used in the production of concrete and mortar, as a raw material, or an additive for the production of secondary cement.

In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the recycling of waste clay bricks, and the extension of their recyclable use has laid a solid foundation for improving its utility value [55,251].

Bleaching powder, also known as chlorinated lime (calcium oxychloride), is mainly composed of calcium hypochlorite. It is widely used as a disinfectant for drinking or swimming pool water and as a bleaching agent. The whitening powder generally has advantageous properties as an economical and viable replacement for other adsorbents for removing fluoride from an aqueous solution. In addition to being a disinfectant, it also acts as a defluorant. Kagne et al. [252] used a bleaching powder to remove fluoride, raising the removal ratio from to 90.6% [52].

Li Wang et al. [84] adopted the new calcium-containing calcite precipitating and assisted precipitating fluorspar to treat wastewater containing fluoride. Key parameters of the reaction were determined, such as reaction timing, the rate of the oscillation, the doses of hydrochloric acid and calcite, etc.

Chen et al. [253] developed a ceramic-based adsorbent for removing fluoride from an aqueous solution. The adsorbent showed sufficient mechanical resistance for long-term adsorption, as well as high efficiency. The same authors also reported results of batch tests of fluoride removal using a surface-modified granular ceramic with an Al-Fe complex [52].

Detailed information on the above-mentioned adsorbents is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Detailed information on the adsorbents used for fluoride removal.

Adsorbent Concentration Range (mg/L) pH Range Contact Time (min) Model Used to Calculate Adsorption Capacity Maximum Adsorption Capacity (mg/g) Ref.
Waste mud - 2–8 0–480 Langmuir and Freundlich 27.2 [220]
Red Mud 5–150 4.7 15–540 Freundlich 0.851 [215]
5 4.7 360 Redlich–Peterson and Freundlich 0.644 [215]
100–1000 5.5 120 Langmuir and Freundlich 3.12 and 6.29 [165]
Modified red mud with AlCl3 (MRMA), heat activated red mud (MRMAH) - 7–8 Langmuir MRMA-68.07
MRMAH-91.28
[216]
Zirconium hydroxide modified red mud porous material
Zr-modified RMPM
- 3 60 pseudo-second-order rate kinetics and pore diffusion models 0.6 [217]
Red mud - 5.5 120 - [218]
Alum sludge - 5.5–6.5 - - 5.35 [221]
Sludge produced during the manufacturing of aluminium sulphate (alum) from kaolin 10 3–8 - - 332.5 [222]
Spent Bleach Earth (SBE) - 3.5 - - 7.75 [223]
Fly ash A and S - - - Freundlich 1.22 (A)
1.01 (S)
[226]
Calcium hydroxide treated fly ash (CFA) 10 7 120 10.86 [227]
Bottom ash - 6 105 BDST 16.26 [228]
Magnesia-loaded fly ash cenospheres (MLC) 10 - - Thomas 5.884 [230]
aluminium-treated bagasse fly ash (ABF) 1–10 6 300 - 10 [232]
Maize husk fly ash 2.0 g/50 mL 2 120 Redlich-Peterson [233]
Activated tea ash (AcTAP) 6 180 Langmuir 8.55 [231]
Waste carbon slurry obtained from fuel oil 15 7.58 120 Langmuir 4.861 [234]
Coal mining waste - 3.5 - Langmuir 15.67 [235]
Shale (coal mine waste) in the form of native shale (NS) and heat activated shale (HAS) at 350 °C, 450 °C and 550 °C 10-HAS550 3 24 h Langmuir 0.358 [236]
Blast furnace slag generated from steel industry 10 mg/l 6–10 35 Langmuir 8.07 [237]
Spent catalyst (a by-product of petrochemical industry) - 4 - 28 [238]
Iron coated spent catalyst - 5.5–6.0 - Langmuir 7.2–20.7 [239]
Thermally activated titanium rich bauxite (TRB) 10 5.5–6.5 - Langmuir 3.8 [240]
High alumina (81.5%) content bauxite - - - Freundlich 3.125 [243]
Bauxite 10 6 90 Freundlicha, Langmuira Tempkina, 3 [241]
Hydrated cement (HC),
brick powder (BP)
marble powder (MP).
30 7
8
7
60 Langmuir 1.72
0.84
0.18
[254]
Bleaching powder - 6–10 - - - [244]
Rice husk ash, which was coated with aluminium hydroxide 10–60 7 60 15.08 [183]
Activated rice husk ash (ARHA) 100 Langmuir 0.402 [231]
Ceramic adsorbents consisting of Kanuma mud, with zeolite, starch, and FeSO4·7H2O 20–100 4–11 0–48 h pseudo-second-order 2.16 [253]
Porous granular ceramic adsorbents containing dispersed aluminium and iron oxides 10 4–9 48 h Langmuir and Freundlich 1.79 [249]
Iron-impregnated granular ceramics 7, 4 Langmuir and Freundlich - [167]
Recycled phosphogypsum in a form of HAP nanoparticles 7 Langmuir-Freundlich 19.742–25 °C
26.108–35 °C
36.914–45 °C
40.818–55 °C
[186]
HAP-calcium phosphate based bioceramic - - - Langmuir and pseudo-second-order 32.57 [250]
HAP
Apatitic tricalcium phosphate.
up to 20
up to 60
4.16
4
Langmuir
Langmuir
13.88–25 °C
14.70–30 °C
15.15–37 °C
[118,119]

5. Fluoride Wastes Removal in Industrial Processes

5.1. Industrial Production of Aluminium Fluoride

The mass production of aluminium fluoride forces significant amounts of silica gel being waste-contaminated with fluoride ions [24,255]. For example, a main fertilizer producer in Lithuania, a joint-stock company “Lifosa”, generates approximately 15 thousand tons per year of the mentioned waste during the manufacture of 17 thousand tons of AlF3 [256]. AlF3 is formed in the reaction of neutralizing hexafluorosilicic acid with aluminium hydroxide. However, due to the strong bonding of fluoride ions to the crystal structure of the latter compound, the purification of silica gel waste is a challenge. As a result, the waste silica gel is mainly disposed in the landfill with no further treatment [25,26,255,257]. The long-term storage of this king of waste provokes many environmental problems, due to the fact of the leaching of fluoride into water [24,255]. According to the literature [258,259,260,261,262,263], the amount of toxic compounds may be reduced by removing them from waste or by reducing their mobility to the environment [11].

5.2. Industrial Waste from Semiconductor Factories

In recent years, the industrial production of electronic materials has contributed to an increase in the global concentration of fluoride and water pollution. The significant contributors to fluoride-contaminated wastewater are semiconductor manufacturers and industrial plants producing hydrofluoric acid, photovoltaic materials, plastics, and textiles [69].

It is assumed that almost 30% of waste produced in the semiconductor industry is of fluorine origin; thus, new treatment methods for this kind of waste are welcome, with one of them described in [65]. The authors converted fluoride waste to AlF3 by an aluminium treatment. AlF3 is then dissolved, and, at the same time, a calcium conditioner is added to replace the AlF3 with CaF2. The method is able to reduce the amount of fluorine contents by a factor of 75%. Moreover, the aluminium component is reusable, therefore the cost of the method is reasonably small [264].

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes are widely used in the production of solar cells and include the deposition of crystalline silicon from chlorosilanes, iodides, bromides, and fluorides [265]. An undesirable side effect is the release of toxic SiO2. The by-products of silicon film deposition consist of large amounts of SiO2 powder, HF vapours, SiH4, and PH3 [266]. These by-products are usually transported to the factory’s central scrubber or dust filter, and treatment produces large amounts of hazardous fluoride-containing sludges.

The effective and cheap treatment of fluorine-containing sludge resulting from CVD processes collected after cleaning the filter cartridge in a photovoltaic installation is located in southern Italy, as found by Zueva et al. [267].

In addition, the treatment of waste with alumina, magnesium sulphate, and lime was tested. These studies aimed to remove the F- content from the liquid phase of the sludge and examine the possibility of producing non-hazardous solid waste. Therefore, the toxicity characterization leaching (TCLP) procedure of the obtained solids was performed with and without thermal treatment. The best conditions for removing fluoride from liquid waste and converting the sludge into non-hazardous waste were related to water treatment with lime and magnesium sulphate.

Electrocoagulation coupled with flotation to treat semiconductor production wastewater was proposed by Hu et al. [77]. The fluoride ions were partially removed by precipitation with calcium in an electrolyser, to which sodium dodecyl sulphate was added to increase flotation. These treatments were effective in reducing fluoride and suspended solids in the wastewater. They lowered the concentration of fluoride from 806 mg/dm3 to 5–6 mg/dm3.

An original fluidization process to recover CaF2 from a synthetic fluoride solution was developed by Aldaco et al. [268]. Granulated calcite and silica were used as seed materials to recover the calcium fluoride by crystallization in a fluidized bed reactor. The inlet concentration of fluoride was 250 mg/L, and the final fluoride conversion was 92%, with a CaF2 content in the solid greater than 97% by weight. This process offers a good alternative for reducing solid waste and reusing calcium fluoride.

In the work of Shin et al. [269], more than 99 wt.% precipitated HF and silicon during the pre-treatment of the solution and recovered Na2SiF6 to commercial grade 98.2%. The remaining solution contained 279 g/L acetic acid, 513 g/L nitric acid, and some HF. It was extracted with 2 ethylhexyl alcohol. Acetic acid was removed from the organic phase with deionized water to give 96.3% acetic acid recovery.

The recycling of SiO2-CaF2 nanoparticle sludge recovered from the semiconductor industry wastewater treatment was investigated by Lee and Liu [270]. The dried and powdered sludge was replaced with 5 to 20 wt.% Portland cement in mortar. The compressive strength of the modified mortar was higher in comparison with the fresh cement mortar after three days of hardening. Moreover, the Toxicity Trait Leaching Procedure (TCLP) showed that no heavy metals were released from the modified mortars. In another study, similar results were obtained with a different deposit produced in the polishing operations of the IC industry. This sludge, consisting of hazardous compounds such as SiO2, Al2O3, CaF2, and unknown organic compounds, was used to replace 10 wt.% cement powder to produce concrete. The compressive strength was comparable to that of regular Portland cement, while the TCLP test did not detect any metal release [271]. In another study, Lee [270] investigated the addition of a PV sludge/fly ash slag mixture for the production of cement mortar. The optimal mixture, determined by the Taguchi method, was 20.9 wt.%. cement flour, 4.3% volatile slag, 3.4% PV sludge, and 71.4% sand. The optimally modified cement mortar showed an increased compressive strength from the fourth day of maturation, reaching the maximum value of 132% after 7 days in relation to the compressive strength of the mortar composed of fresh Portland cement.

As such, recycling sludge from the PV industry is essential to preventing their potential environmental hazards and helping to reduce the cement industry’s carbon footprint and environmental impact.

One type of hazardous waste was the fluorine-containing sludge from the semiconductor industry, the safe treatment and disposal of which were ineffective. Da et al. [272] presented the research results on the assessment of the possibility of adding fluorine-containing sludge to cement clinker. The authors inform that the addition of 2.0% of the sludge significantly improved the flammability of the clinker and improved a formation of alite. However, increasing the amount of the sludge to 5.0% caused the profuse formation of interstitial phases and slowed down the formation of alite and belite. The presence of fluorite was high in the silicate phase, resulting in the accumulation of this compound mainly at the surface. The fluoride was immobilized by calcium, with the immobilization rates for fluorine, copper, zinc, and nickel reaching a level of 99.5%. A sludge addition did not cause any threats or side effects [272].

6. A New Concept(s) for the Production and Management of Fluoride Adsorbents

According to the review, there are many methods of removing fluoride, including using sorbents made from industrial waste, by-product, and biomass. Many sorbents and their application methods have been developed, dedicated to specific industrial processes, in which there are fluorides in the form of wastewater or waste. There are also known methods of using fluoride-containing wastes to produce new products used in many fields, including construction. However, further research on developing new solutions is still being carried out. One of the latest proposals is the production of composites from several types of waste, which, although they can be used alone as materials for removing fluorides, especially from water and sewage, must first be deeply processed; e.g., calcination or their direct use is associated with technical problems at the stage of separating the used sorbent from the treated liquid by means of filtration or sedimentation [273].

Paper sludge (PS) is generated as industrial waste in the process of recycling paper products, with the amount continuously increasing year by year [274]. PS mainly contains cellulose fibres (up to 50–60%) and inorganic fillers along with coating materials such as calcite, kaolinite, and talc [275]. The paper industry is of great importance to the natural environment due to the amount of PS produced and its disposal. A small part of PS waste is used in agriculture as a soil improver and fertilizer [276,277,278,279,280]. However, PS is mostly disposed in open landfills with no further treatment, which is a growing problem especially for highly developed countries. Recently, we observed some tries to use PS as an additive to cement [281], metakaolin for the production of ceramics and glass [282], fuel for energy recovery [283,284], and carbon adsorbent for removing organic pollutants [285], thus reducing the amount of PS disposed in landfills.

Takaaki Wajima et al. converted PS into an effective fluoride sequestrant by the process of calcination in a high temperature for several hours. They determined that PS fired at 800 °C shows highest fluorine absorption. The authors also pointed out the fact of the selective removal of fluoride in several solutions containing chlorides, nitrates, and sulphates [274].

Using paper slurries obtained in the creation of composites based on non-calcined sludge and post-soda lime is an interesting and innovative solution to remove fluoride from water and sewage [273]. Post-soda lime is a by-product formed in the process of separating the solid phase present in the still liquid during the production of soda by the Solvay method. The mixture mainly contains some calcium compounds (CaCl2, CaCO3, CaSO4, Ca(OH)2), magnesium and silica, sulphur, and aluminium. It is characterized by a very high hydration (up to 60%) and low particle size distribution (less than 2 μm). Unfortunately, such properties strongly limit the traditional usage of this waste material [286]. According to the invention, the above problems are solved by the method [287,288], where very fine soda ash, preferably from clarifiers, is applied to fibrous cellulosic support in the form of papermaking sludges. The result is a composite that is highly permeable to liquids and removes fluoride ions very efficiently, with the same amount of added fluoride precipitant being even twice as high as in the case of traditional materials used to remove fluorides (such as ground limestone and chalk). The content of cellulose fibres in the composite allows it to be shaped practically in any form, e.g., in the form of granules, pellets, flat membranes, plates, cylinders, etc., depending on the user’s needs. They can also be placed in filter bags that are permeable to solutions, so they can be used repeatedly until the calcium compounds are entirely converted. After use, they can be easily removed from the treated solution. The used sorbent can be used analogously to paper sludge, for example as an additive/filler for building materials [36]. It was shown that, due to the calcium compounds used, the targeted material may be supplemented with hazardous mineral waste containing fluorine, e.g., in form of post-crystallization lye formed in the processing of fluosilicic acid or phosphogypsum. The approach improves the reuse of waste materials, as well as minimizes the usage of raw materials, contributing to the concept of a circular economy.

7. Conclusions

The negative impact of hazardous waste on the health of ecosystems, including humans, is becoming a rapidly growing global problem. The large amount of waste materials caused by the industry and human life is becoming a huge problem for both enterprises and local administrations, increasing the costs of everyday activities. Therefore, recycling and reusing industrial waste and by-products are of great importance. Many of them can be used to produce new construction materials after “solidification/stabilization” processes. Such materials may be used as admixtures or raw materials. In this case, an assessment of the leaching of the contaminants should be of particular concern, as well as the overall efficiency of the conversion process. Therefore, it is important to know the properties and conditions of use of fluoride binders.

Several materials have been proposed and tested as adsorbents towards efficient fluoride removal, taking into account also low processing costs and minimal side effects. The research in this area is undergoing, and the authors describe a high adsorption of fluoride-originated waste. However, the proposed methods usually depend on the particular pH and other process parameters that are difficult to achieve and maintain. Moreover, the adsorbents usually cannot be fully reused without costly regeneration. In addition, the competing ions show an affinity to the same active parts of the adsorbent, and the excess of some organic compounds delays the process balance.

In general, the concentration of fluoride ions can be reduced by a number of methods. Research on new methods for removing fluoride ions is still ongoing. At the same time, efforts are made to increase the efficiency of existing technologies. The removal of fluoride ions is a significant problem because they have a negative impact on human health [8]. Extensive research is required to develop and implement low-cost, sustainable hybrid technologies that can overcome the disadvantages of stand-alone processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O., I.R. and W.U.; investigation, M.O.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O. and I.R.; writing—review and editing, M.O., I.R. and W.U.; visualization, M.O.; supervision, W.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

Project co-financed by the Regional Operational Programme for Pomorskie Voivodeship 2014–2020, Project no. RPPM.01.01.01-22-0040/18-00.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Gupta N., Yadav K.K., Kumar V. A review on current status of municipal solid waste management in India. J. Environ. Sci. 2015;37:206–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Melaré A.V.D.S., González S.M., Faceli K., Casadei V. Technologies and decision support systems to aid solid-waste management: A systematic review. Waste Manag. 2017;59:567–584. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bing X., Bloemhof J.M., Ramos T.R.P., Barbosa-Povoa A., Wong C.Y., van der Vorst J.G. Research challenges in municipal solid waste logistics management. Waste Manag. 2016;48:584–592. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hettiarachchi H., Meegoda J.N., Ryu S. Organic Waste Buyback as a Viable Method to Enhance Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:2483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ouda O.K.M., Raza S.A., Nizami A.S., Rehan M., Al-Waked R., Korres N.E. Waste to energy potential: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016;61:328–340. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sadef Y., Nizami A.-S., Batool S.A., Chaudary M.N., Ouda O.K.M., Asam Z.-U., Habib K., Rehan M., Demirbas A. Waste-to-energy and recycling value for developing integrated solid waste management plan in Lahore. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy. 2016;11:569–579. doi: 10.1080/15567249.2015.1052595. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sawadogo M., Tanoh S.T., Sidibé S., Kpai N., Tankoano I. Cleaner production in Burkina Faso: Case study of fuel briquettes made from cashew industry waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;195:1047–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ghisolfi V., Chaves G.D.L.D., Siman R.R., Xavier L.H. System dynamics applied to closed loop supply chains of desktops and laptops in Brazil: A perspective for social inclusion of waste pickers. Waste Manag. 2017;60:14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Matter A., Ahsan M., Marbach M., Zurbrügg C. Impacts of policy and market incentives for solid waste recycling in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Waste Manag. 2015;39:321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ferronato N., Torretta V. Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:1060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rudelis V., Dambrauskas T., Grineviciene A., Baltakys K. The Prospective Approach for the Reduction of Fluoride Ions Mobility in Industrial Waste by Creating Products of Commercial Value. Sustainability. 2019;11:634. doi: 10.3390/su11030634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Angin D. Utilization of activated carbon produced from fruit juice industry solid waste for the adsorption of Yellow 18 from aqueous solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014;168:259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bujak J.W. Thermal utilization (treatment) of plastic waste. Energy. 2015;90:1468–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moh Y. Solid waste management transformation and future challenges of source separation and recycling practice in Malaysia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017;116:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shen C.-W., Tran P.P., Ly P.T.M. Chemical Waste Management in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. Sustainability. 2018;10:1545. doi: 10.3390/su10051545. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stonys R., Kuznetsov D., Krasnikovs A., Škamat J., Baltakys K., Antonovič V., Černašėjus O. Reuse of ultrafine mineral wool production waste in the manufacture of refractory concrete. J. Environ. Manag. 2016;176:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yilmaz O., Kara B.Y., Yetis U. Hazardous waste management system design under population and environmental impact considerations. J. Environ. Manag. 2017;203:720–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Woźniak J., Pactwa K. Overview of Polish Mining Wastes with Circular Economy Model and Its Comparison with Other Wastes. Sustainability. 2018;10:3994. doi: 10.3390/su10113994. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Siddique R. Utilization of Industrial By-products in Concrete. Procedia Eng. 2014;95:335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dyachenko A., Petlin I., Malyutin L. The Research of Sulfuric Acidic Recycling of Aluminum Industry Fluorine-containing Waste Products. Procedia Chem. 2014;11:10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2014.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li Y., Zhang H., Zhang Z., Shao L., He P. Treatment and resource recovery from inorganic fluoride-containing waste produced by the pesticide industry. J. Environ. Sci. 2015;31:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.de Beer M., Doucet F., Maree J., Liebenberg L. Synthesis of high-purity precipitated calcium carbonate during the process of recovery of elemental sulphur from gypsum waste. Waste Manag. 2015;46:619–627. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baek C., Seo J., Choi M., Cho J., Ahn J., Cho K. Utilization of CFBC Fly Ash as a Binder to Produce In-Furnace Desulfurization Sorbent. Sustainability. 2018;10:4854. doi: 10.3390/su10124854. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vaičiukynienė D., Vaitkevičius V., Kantautas A., Sasnauskas V. Utilization of by-product waste silica in concrete-based materials. Mater. Res. 2012;15:561–567. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392012005000082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iljina A., Baltakys K., Baltakys M., Siauciunas R. Neutralization and removal of compounds containing fluoride ions from waste silica gel. Rom. J. Mater. 2014;44:265–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iljina A., Baltakys K., Bankauskaite A., Eisinas A., Kitrys S. The stability of formed CaF2 and its influence on the thermal behavior of C–S–H in CaO–silica gel waste-H2O system. J. Therm. Anal. 2016;127:221–228. doi: 10.1007/s10973-016-5412-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vaičiukynienė D., Kantautas A., Vaitkevičius V., Jakevičius L., Rudžionis Ž., Paškevičius M. Effects of ultrasonic treatment on zeolite NaA synthesized from by-product silica. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015;27:515–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baltakys K., Iljina A., Bankauskaite A. Thermal properties and application of silica gel waste contaminated with F− ions for C-S-H synthesis. J. Therm. Anal. 2015;121:145–154. doi: 10.1007/s10973-015-4663-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hydrothermal Synthesis of Calcium Sulfoaluminate–Belite Cement from Industrial Waste Materials—Advances in Engineering. [(accessed on 9 January 2022)]. Available online: https://advanceseng.com/hydrothermal-synthesis-calcium-sulfoaluminate-belite-cement-industrial-waste-materials/
  • 30.Shen Z., Jin F., O’Connor D., Hou D. Solidification/Stabilization for Soil Remediation: An Old Technology with New Vitality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:11615–11617. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ma W., Chen D., Pan M., Gu T., Zhong L., Chen G., Yan B., Cheng Z. Performance of chemical chelating agent stabilization and cement solidification on heavy metals in MSWI fly ash: A comparative study. J. Environ. Manag. 2019;247:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen W., Wang F., Li Z., Li Q. A comprehensive evaluation of the treatment of lead in MSWI fly ash by the combined cement solidification and phosphate stabilization process. Waste Manag. 2020;114:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Feng Y.-S., Du Y.-J., Zhou A., Zhang M., Li J.-S., Zhou S.-J., Xia W.-Y. Geoenvironmental properties of industrially contaminated site soil solidified/stabilized with a sustainable by-product-based binder. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;765:142778. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang W.-L., Zhao L.-Y., Yuan Z.-J., Li D.-Q., Morrison L. Assessment of the long-term leaching characteristics of cement-slag stabilized/solidified contaminated sediment. Chemosphere. 2020;267:128926. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Solidification/Stabilization-ITRC. [(accessed on 2 March 2022)]. Available online: https://itrcweb.org/itrcwebsite/teams/projects/solidificationstabilization.
  • 36.Kizinievic O., Kizinievic V., Trambitski Y., Voisniene V. Application of paper sludge and clay in manufacture of composite materials: Properties and biological susceptibility. J. Build. Eng. 2022;48:104003. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jayarathne T., Stockwell C.E., Yokelson R.J., Nakao S., Stone E.A. Emissions of Fine Particle Fluoride from Biomass Burning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:12636–12644. doi: 10.1021/es502933j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nayak B., Samant A., Patel R., Misra P.K. Comprehensive Understanding of the Kinetics and Mechanism of Fluoride Removal over a Potent Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Surface. ACS Omega. 2017;2:8118–8128. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bodzek M., Konieczny K. Open Access (CC BY-NC 4K.0) Fluorki w środowisku wodnym-zagrożenia i metody usuwania Fluorine in the Water Environment—Hazards and Removal Methods. Eng. Prot. Environ. 2018;21:113–141. doi: 10.17512/ios.2018.2.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tang W., Kovalsky P., He D., Waite T.D. Fluoride and nitrate removal from brackish groundwaters by batch-mode capacitive deionization. Water Res. 2015;84:342–349. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang L., Sun N., Wang Z., Han H., Yang Y., Liu R., Hu Y., Tang H., Sun W. Self-assembly of mixed dodecylamine–dodecanol molecules at the air/water interface based on large-scale molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Liq. 2019;276:867–874. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.12.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Claveau-Mallet D., Wallace S., Comeau Y. Removal of phosphorus, fluoride and metals from a gypsum mining leachate using steel slag filters. Water Res. 2013;47:1512–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang Y., Zhu H., Jiang X., Lv G., Yan J. Study on the evolution and transformation of Cl during Co-incineration of a mixture of rectification residue and raw meal of a cement kiln. Waste Manag. 2019;84:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Guth S., Hüser S., Roth A., Degen G., Diel P., Edlund K., Eisenbrand G., Engel K.-H., Epe B., Grune T., et al. Toxicity of fluoride: Critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses. Arch. Toxicol. 2020;94:1375–1415. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02725-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.World Health Organization . Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality 3rd Edition Incorporating the First and Second Addenda. Volume 1 World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2008. Recommendations Geneva 2008 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Karthikeyan G., Shunmugasundarraj A. Isopleth mapping and in-situ fluoride dependence on water quality in the krishnagiri block of tamil nadu in south india. Res. Rep. 2000;33:121–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rao N.S. Groundwater quality: Focus on fluoride concentration in rural parts of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2003;48:835–847. doi: 10.1623/hysj.48.5.835.51449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Viswanathan G., Jaswanth A., Gopalakrishnan S., Ilango S.S., Aditya G. Determining the optimal fluoride concentration in drinking water for fluoride endemic regions in South India. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;407:5298–5307. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abdelgawad A., Watanabe K., Takeuchi S., Mizuno T. The origin of fluoride-rich groundwater in Mizunami area, Japan—Mineralogy and geochemistry implications. Eng. Geol. 2009;108:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rafique T., Naseem S., Bhanger M.I., Usmani T.H. Fluoride ion contamination in the groundwater of Mithi sub-district, the Thar Desert, Pakistan. Environ. Earth Sci. 2008;56:317–326. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-1167-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Meenakshi, Maheshwari R. Fluoride in drinking water and its removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006;137:456–463. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Habuda-Stanić M., Ravančić M.E., Flanagan A. A Review on Adsorption of Fluoride from Aqueous Solution. Materials. 2014;7:6317–6366. doi: 10.3390/ma7096317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Waghmare S.S., Arfin T. Fluoride removal by industrial, agricultural and biomass wastes as adsorbents: Review. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Ideas Educ. 2015;1:628–653. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tomar V., Kumar D. A critical study on efficiency of different materials for fluoride removal from aqueous media. Chem. Cent. J. 2013;7:51. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kumar P.S., Suganya S., Srinivas S., Priyadharshini S., Karthika M., Karishma Sri R., Lichtfouse E. Treatment of fluoride-contaminated water. A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019;17:1707–1726. doi: 10.1007/s10311-019-00906-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Waghmare S.S., Arfin T. Fluoride Removal by Clays, Geomaterials, Minerals, Low Cost Materials and Zeolites by Ad-sorption: A Review. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. Res. 2015;4:3663–3676. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Waghmare S.S., Arfin T. Fluoride Removal from Water by various techniques: Review. IJISET—Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2015;2:560–571. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rao N. Fluoride and Environment—A Review; Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environment and Health; Chennai, India. 15–17 December 2003; pp. 386–399. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schlesinger W.H., Klein E.M., Vengosh A. Global Biogeochemical Cycle of Fluorine. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles. 2020;34:e2020GB006722. doi: 10.1029/2020GB006722. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.He J., Yang Y., Wu Z., Xie C., Zhang K., Kong L., Liu J. Review of fluoride removal from water environment by adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:104516. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bhatnagar A., Kumar E., Sillanpää M. Fluoride removal from water by adsorption—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;171:811–840. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang L., Sun N., Tang H., Sun W. A Review on Comprehensive Utilization of Red Mud and Prospect Analysis. Minerals. 2019;9:362. doi: 10.3390/min9060362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Arora H.C., Chattopadhya S.N. A study on the effluent disposal of superphosphate fertilizer factory. Environ. Health. 1994;16:140–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mourad N., Sharshar T., Elnimr T., Mousa M. Radioactivity and fluoride contamination derived from a phosphate fertilizer plant in Egypt. Appl. Radiat. Isot. Incl. Data Instrum. Methods Use Agric. Ind. Med. 2009;67:1259–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Shen J., Schaefer A. Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: A review. Chemosphere. 2014;117:679–691. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fan C.-S., Li K.-C. Production of insulating glass ceramics from thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) waste glass and calcium fluoride sludge. J. Clean. Prod. 2013;57:335–341. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ponsot I., Falcone R., Bernardo E. Stabilization of fluorine-containing industrial waste by production of sintered glass-ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2013;39:6907–6915. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sujana M.G., Thakur R.S., Das S.N., Rao S.B. Defluorination of Waste Water. Asian J. Chem. 1997;9:561–570. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shen F., Chen X., Gao P., Chen G. Electrochemical removal of fluoride ions from industrial wastewater. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003;58:987–993. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00639-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Blagojevic S., Jakovljevic M., Radulovic M. Content of fluorine in soils in the vicinity of aluminium plant in Podgorica. J. Agric. Sci. 2002;47:1–8. doi: 10.2298/JAS0201001B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Paulson E.G. Reducing fluoride in industrial wastewater. Chem. Eng. 1997;84:89–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Khatibikamal V., Torabian A., Janpoor F., Hoshyaripour G. Fluoride removal from industrial wastewater using electrocoagulation and its adsorption kinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;179:276–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Drouiche N., Aoudj S., Hecini M., Ghaffour N., Lounici H., Mameri N. Study on the treatment of photovoltaic wastewater using electrocoagulation: Fluoride removal with aluminium electrodes—Characteristics of products. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;169:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Drouiche N., Djouadi-Belkada F., Ouslimane T., Kefaifi A., Fathi J., Ahmetovic E. Photovoltaic solar cells industry wastewater treatment. Desalination Water Treat. 2013;51:5965–5973. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.763217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Huang C. Precipitate flotation of fluoride-containing wastewater from a semiconductor manufacturer. Water Res. 1999;33:3403–3412. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00065-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Paudyal H., Pangeni B., Inoue K., Kawakita H., Ohto K., Alam S. Removal of Fluoride from Aqueous Solution by Using Porous Resins Containing Hydrated Oxide of Cerium(IV) and Zirconium(IV) J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2012;45:331–336. doi: 10.1252/jcej.11we181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hu C.-Y., Lo S., Kuan W., Lee Y. Removal of fluoride from semiconductor wastewater by electrocoagulation–flotation. Water Res. 2005;39:895–901. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Warmadewanthi B., Liu J.C. Selective separation of phosphate and fluoride from semiconductor wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2009;59:2047–2053. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Neuwahl F., Cusano G., Benavides J.G., Holbrook S., Roudier S. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Waste Incineration. European Union; Luxembourg: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ghosh A., Mukherjee K., Ghosh S.K., Saha B. Sources and toxicity of fluoride in the environment. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2012;39:2881–2915. doi: 10.1007/s11164-012-0841-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dreveton A. Overview of the Fluorochemicals Industrial Sectors. Procedia Eng. 2016;138:240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chlebna-Sokol D. Wpływ Ponadoptymalnych Stężeń Fluorków w Wodzie Pitnej na Rozwój Biologiczny i Stan Zdrowia Dzieci w Wieku Szkolnym. Polska Akademia Nauk; Łódź, Poland: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ndiaye P., Moulin P., Dominguez L., Millet J., Charbit F. Removal of fluoride from electronic industrial effluentby RO membrane separation. Desalination. 2005;173:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.07.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wang L., Zhang Y., Sun N., Sun W., Hu Y., Tang H. Precipitation Methods Using Calcium-Containing Ores for Fluoride Removal in Wastewater. Minerals. 2019;9:511. doi: 10.3390/min9090511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Liu Y., Fan Q., Wang S., Liu Y., Zhou A., Fan L. Adsorptive removal of fluoride from aqueous solutions using Al-humic acid-La aerogel composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;306:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zeng G., Ling B., Li Z., Luo S., Sui X., Guan Q. Fluorine removal and calcium fluoride recovery from rare-earth smelting wastewater using fluidized bed crystallization process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019;373:313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Raghav S., Nehra S., Kumar D. Adsorptive removal studies of fluoride in aqueous system by bimetallic oxide incorporated in cellulose. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. Part B. 2019;127:211–225. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.05.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Chigondo M., Paumo H.K., Bhaumik M., Pillay K., Maity A. Hydrous CeO2-Fe3O4 decorated polyaniline fibers nanocomposite for effective defluoridation of drinking water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;532:500–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sarkar M., Banerjee A., Pramanick P.P., Sarkar A.R. Use of laterite for the removal of fluoride from contaminated drinking water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;302:432–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Oguz E. Adsorption of fluoride on gas concrete materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005;117:227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Alagumuthu G., Veeraputhiran V., Venkataraman R. Adsorption Isotherms on Fluoride Removal: Batch Techniques. [(accessed on 9 January 2022)];Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2010 2:170–185. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/2555273/Adsorption_Isotherms_on_Fluoride_Removal_Batch_Techniques. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chaudhary M., Maiti A. Defluoridation by highly efficient calcium hydroxide nanorods from synthetic and industrial wastewater. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019;561:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.10.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Venditti F., Cuomo F., Giansalvo G., Giustini M., Cinelli G., Lopez F. Fluorides decontamination by means of Aluminum polychloride based commercial coagulant. J. Water Process. Eng. 2018;26:182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.10.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tolkou A.K., Mitrakas M., Katsoyiannis I.A., Ernst M., Zouboulis A.I. Fluoride removal from water by composite Al/Fe/Si/Mg pre-polymerized coagulants: Characterization and application. Chemosphere. 2019;231:528–537. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Turner B.D., Binning P., Stipp S.L.S. Fluoride Removal by Calcite: Evidence for Fluorite Precipitation and Surface Adsorption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:9561–9568. doi: 10.1021/es0505090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.El-Gohary F., Tawfik A., Mahmoud U. Comparative study between chemical coagulation/precipitation (C/P) versus coagulation/dissolved air flotation (C/DAF) for pre-treatment of personal care products (PCPs) wastewater. Desalination. 2010;252:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.10.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Saha S. Treatment of aqueous effluent for fluoride removal. Water Res. 1993;27:1347–1350. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(93)90222-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Reardon E.J., Wang Y. A Limestone Reactor for Fluoride Removal from Wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000;34:3247–3253. doi: 10.1021/es990542k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gong W.-X., Qu J.-H., Liu R.-P., Lan H.-C. Effect of aluminum fluoride complexation on fluoride removal by coagulation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012;395:88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Herath H.M.A.S., Kawakami T., Tafu M. Repeated Heat Regeneration of Bone Char for Sustainable Use in Fluoride Removal from Drinking Water. Healthcare. 2018;6:143. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6040143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Asimeng B.O., Fianko J.R., Kaufmann E.E., Tiburu E.K., Hayford C.F., Anani P.A., Dzikunu O.K. Preparation and characterization of hydroxyapatite from Achatina achatina snail shells: Effect of carbonate substitution and trace elements on defluoridation of water. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2018;6:205–212. doi: 10.1080/21870764.2018.1488570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kodama H., Kabay N. Reactivity of inorganic anion exchanger BiPbO2(NO3) with fluoride ions in solution. Solid State Ion. 2001;141-142:603–607. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00775-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chubar N., Samanidou V., Kouts V., Gallios G., Kanibolotsky V., Strelko V., Zhuravlev I. Adsorption of fluoride, chloride, bromide, and bromate ions on a novel ion exchanger. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;291:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.04.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hänninen K., Kaukonen A.M., Murtomäki L., Hirvonen J.T. Mechanistic evaluation of factors affecting compound loading into ion-exchange fibers. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci. 2007;31:306–317. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ruixia L., Jinlong G., Hongxiao T. Adsorption of Fluoride, Phosphate, and Arsenate Ions on a New Type of Ion Exchange Fiber. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;248:268–274. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Meenakshi S., Viswanathan N. Identification of selective ion-exchange resin for fluoride sorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;308:438–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Paudyal H., Pangeni B., Inoue K., Kawakita H., Ohto K., Ghimire K.N., Alam S. Preparation of novel alginate based anion exchanger from Ulva japonica and its application for the removal of trace concentrations of fluoride from water. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;148:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Guo Q., Tian J. Removal of fluoride and arsenate from aqueous solution by hydrocalumite via precipitation and anion exchange. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;231:121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hichour M., Persin F., Molénat J., Sandeaux J., Gavach C. Fluoride removal from diluted solutions by Donnan dialysis with anion-exchange membranes. Desalination. 1999;122:53–62. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00027-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Amor Z., Malki S., Taky M., Bariou B., Mameri N., Elmidaoui A. Optimization of fluoride removal from brackish water by electrodialysis. Desalination. 1998;120:263–271. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00223-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ahamad K.U., Mahanta A., Ahmed S. Removal of Fluoride from Groundwater by Adsorption onto Brick Powder–Alum–Calcium-Infused Adsorbent. Adv. Waste Manag. 2019:231–242. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0215-2_16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hashim K.S., Shaw A., Al Khaddar R., Pedrola M.O., Phipps D. Defluoridation of drinking water using a new flow column-electrocoagulation reactor (FCER)—Experimental, statistical, and economic approach. J. Environ. Manag. 2017;197:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Cui H., Qian Y., An H., Sun C., Zhai J., Li Q. Electrochemical removal of fluoride from water by PAOA-modified carbon felt electrodes in a continuous flow reactor. Water Res. 2012;46:3943–3950. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lin J.-Y., Raharjo A., Hsu L.-H., Shih Y.-J., Huang Y.-H. Electrocoagulation of tetrafluoroborate (BF4−) and the derived boron and fluorine using aluminum electrodes. Water Res. 2019;155:362–371. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Tahaikt M., Achary I., Sahli M.M., Amor Z., Taky M., Alami A., Boughriba A., Hafsi M., Elmidaoui A. Defluoridation of Moroccan groundwater by electrodialysis: Continuous operation. Desalination. 2006;189:215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.06.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Renuka P., Pushpanjali K. Review on Defluoridation Techniques of Water. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2013;2:86–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Sahli M.M., Annouar S., Tahaikt M., Mountadar M., Soufiane A., Elmidaoui A. Fluoride removal for underground brackish water by adsorption on the natural chitosan and by electrodialysis. Desalination. 2007;212:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zuo Q., Chen X., Li W., Chen G. Combined electrocoagulation and electroflotation for removal of fluoride from drinking water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;159:452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Ergun E., Tor A., Cengeloglu Y., Kocak I. Electrodialytic removal of fluoride from water: Effects of process parameters and accompanying anions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008;64:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Kabay N., Arar Ö., Samatya S., Yüksel Ü., Yüksel M. Separation of fluoride from aqueous solution by electrodialysis: Effect of process parameters and other ionic species. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;153:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mameri N., Lounici H., Belhocine D., Grib H., Piron D., Yahiat Y. Defluoridation of Sahara water by small plant electrocoagulation using bipolar aluminium electrodes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001;24:113–119. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00218-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Arar O., Yavuz E., Yuksel U., Kabay N. Separation of Low Concentration of Fluoride from Water by Electrodialysis (ED) in the Presence of Chloride and Sulfate Ions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009;44:1562–1573. doi: 10.1080/01496390902775943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Un U.T., Koparal A.S., Ogutveren U.B. Fluoride removal from water and wastewater with a bach cylindrical electrode using electrocoagulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;223:110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Karabelas A., Yiantsios S., Metaxiotou Z., Andritsos N., Akiskalos A., Vlachopoulos G., Stavroulias S. Water and materials recovery from fertilizer industry acidic effluents by membrane processes. Desalination. 2001;138:93–102. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00250-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Sehn P. Fluoride removal with extra low energy reverse osmosis membranes: Three years of large scale field experience in Finland. Desalination. 2008;223:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Guo L., Hunt B.J., Santschi P.H. Ultrafiltration behavior of major ions (Na, Ca, Mg, F, Cl, and SO4) in natural waters. Water Res. 2001;35:1500–1508. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00407-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Lhassani A., Rumeau M., Benjelloun D., Pontie M. Selective demineralization of water by nanofiltration Application to the defluorination of brackish water. Water Res. 2001;35:3260–3264. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00020-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hu K., Dickson J.M. Nanofiltration membrane performance on fluoride removal from water. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;279:529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Malaisamy R., Talla-Nwafo A., Jones K.L. Polyelectrolyte modification of nanofiltration membrane for selective removal of monovalent anions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011;77:367–374. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ghosh D., Sinha M., Purkait M. A comparative analysis of low-cost ceramic membrane preparation for effective fluoride removal using hybrid technique. Desalination. 2013;327:2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Chakrabortty S., Roy M., Pal P. Removal of fluoride from contaminated groundwater by cross flow nanofiltration: Transport modeling and economic evaluation. Desalination. 2013;313:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yadav K.K., Kumar S., Pham Q.B., Gupta N., Rezania S., Kamyab H., Yadav S., Vymazal J., Kumar V., Tri D.Q., et al. Fluoride contamination, health problems and remediation methods in Asian groundwater: A comprehensive review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;182:109362. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Jeihanipour A., Shen J., Abbt-Braun G., Huber S.A., Mkongo G., Schäfer A.I. Seasonal variation of organic matter characteristics and fluoride concentration in the Maji ya Chai River (Tanzania): Impact on treatability by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;637-638:1209–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Grzegorzek M., Majewska-Nowak K. The use of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) for fluoride removal from aqueous solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018;195:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sequeira E.A.T., Miranda V.M., Solache-Ríos M., Hernández I.L. Aluminum and lanthanum effects in natural materials on the adsorption of fluoride ions. J. Fluor. Chem. 2013;148:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Saxena A., Patel A. Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2018. Role of Bioremediation as a Low-Cost Adsorbent for Excessive Fluoride Removal in Groundwater; pp. 1–32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Mohan D., Singh K.P., Singh V.K. Wastewater treatment using low cost activated carbons derived from agricultural byproducts—A case study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;152:1045–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Alagumuthu G., Rajan M. Kinetic and equilibrium studies on fluoride removal by zirconium (IV): Impregnated groundnut shell carbon. Chem. Ind. 2010;64:295–304. doi: 10.2298/HEMIND100307017A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Alagumuthu G., Veeraputhiran V., Venkataraman R. Fluoride sorption using Cynodon dactylon based activated carbon. Chem. Ind. 2011;65:23–35. doi: 10.2298/HEMIND100712052A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Alagumuthu G., Rajan M. Equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption of fluoride onto zirconium impregnated cashew nut shell carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2010;158:451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Daifullah A.A.M., Yakout S.M., A Elreefy S. Adsorption of fluoride in aqueous solutions using KMnO4-modified activated carbon derived from steam pyrolysis of rice straw. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007;147:633–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hernández-Montoya V., Ramírez-Montoya L.A., Bonilla-Petriciolet A., Montes-Moran M.A. Optimizing the removal of fluoride from water using new carbons obtained by modification of nut shell with a calcium solution from egg shell. Biochem. Eng. J. 2012;62:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Meenakshi S. Studies on Defluoridation of Water with a Few Adsorbents and Development of an Indigenous Defluoridation Unit for Do-mestic Use. The Gandhigram Rural Institute; Tamil Nadu, India: 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Malay D.K., Salim A.J. Salim, Comparative Study of Batch Adsorption of Fluoride Using Commercial and Natural Adsorbent. Res. J. Chem. Sci. 2011;1:68–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Viswanathan N., Meenakshi S. Role of metal ion incorporation in ion exchange resin on the selectivity of fluoride. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;162:920–930. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Viswanathan N., Meenakshi S. Effect of metal ion loaded in a resin towards fluoride retention. J. Fluor. Chem. 2008;129:645–653. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2008.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Vardhan C.V., Karthikeyan J. Removal of Fluoride from Water Using Low-Cost Materials; Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC-15; Alexandria, Egypt. 28–30 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Coetzee P., Coetzee L., Puka R., Mubenga S. Characterisation of selected South African clays for defluoridation of natural waters. Water SA. 2004;29:331–338. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v29i3.4935. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Yadav A.K., Kaushik C.P., Haritash A.K., Kansal A., Rani N. Defluoridation of groundwater using brick powder as an adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006;128:289–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Malakootian M., Moosazadeh M., Yousefi N., Fatehizadeh A. Fluoride removal from aqueous solution by pumice: Case study on Kuhbonan water. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;5:299–306. doi: 10.4314/ajest.v5i4.71942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Chidambaram S., Ramanathan A., Vasudevan S. Fluoride removal studies in water using natural materials: Technical note. Water SA. 2004;29:339–344. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v29i3.4936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Maliyekkal S.M., Shukla S., Philip L., Nambi I.M. Enhanced fluoride removal from drinking water by magnesia-amended activated alumina granules. Chem. Eng. J. 2008;140:183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.09.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Tripathy S.S., Raichur A. Abatement of fluoride from water using manganese dioxide-coated activated alumina. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;153:1043–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Lavecchia R., Medici F., Piga L., Rinaldi G., Zuorro A. Fluoride removal from water by adsorption on a high-alumina content bauxite. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2012;26:225–230. doi: 10.3303/CET1226038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Teutli-Sequeira A., Solache-Rios M., Balderas-Hernández P. Modification Effects of Hematite with Aluminum Hydroxide on the Removal of Fluoride Ions from Water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011;223:319–327. doi: 10.1007/s11270-011-0860-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Shan Y., Guo H. Fluoride adsorption on modified natural siderite: Optimization and performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;223:183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Sajidu S., Kayira C., Masamba W., Mwatseteza J. Defluoridation of Groundwater Using Raw Bauxite: Rural Domestic Defluoridation Technology. Environ. Nat. Resour. Res. 2012;2:1. doi: 10.5539/enrr.v2n3p1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Goswami D., Das A.K. Removal of fluoride from drinking water using a modified fly ash adsorbent. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2006;65:77–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Sundaram C.S., Viswanathan N., Meenakshi S. Defluoridation chemistry of synthetic hydroxyapatite at nano scale: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;155:206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Sundaram C.S., Viswanathan N., Meenakshi S. Uptake of fluoride by nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan, a bioinorganic composite. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:8226–8230. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Salifu A., Petrusevski B., Ghebremichael K., Modestus L., Buamah R., Aubry C., Amy G. Aluminum (hydr)oxide coated pumice for fluoride removal from drinking water: Synthesis, equilibrium, kinetics and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;228:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Tembhurkar A.R., Dongre S. Studies on fluoride removal using adsorption process. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2006;48:151–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Nath S.K., Dutta R.K. Fluoride removal from water using crushed limestone. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 2010;17:120–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Bhargava D., Killedar D. Fluoride adsorption on fishbone charcoal through a moving media adsorber. Water Res. 1992;26:781–788. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(92)90009-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Çengeloglu Y. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by using red mud. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002;28:81–86. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5866(02)00016-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Asgari G., Roshani B., Ghanizadeh G. The investigation of kinetic and isotherm of fluoride adsorption onto functionalize pumice stone. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012;217–218:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Chen N., Zhang Z., Feng C., Li M., Zhu D., Sugiura N. Studies on fluoride adsorption of iron-impregnated granular ceramics from aqueous solution. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011;125:293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.09.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Kamble S.P., Jagtap S., Labhsetwar N.K., Thakare D., Godfrey S., Devotta S., Rayalu S.S. Defluoridation of drinking water using chitin, chitosan and lanthanum-modified chitosan. Chem. Eng. J. 2007;129:173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2006.10.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Viswanathan N., Meenakshi S. Development of chitosan supported zirconium(IV) tungstophosphate composite for fluoride removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;176:459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Jagtap S., Thakre D., Wanjari S., Kamble S., Labhsetwar N., Rayalu S. New modified chitosan-based adsorbent for defluoridation of water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;332:280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.11.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Sujana M., Mishra A., Acharya B. Hydrous ferric oxide doped alginate beads for fluoride removal: Adsorption kinetics and equilibrium studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013;270:767–776. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Liang P., Zhang Y., Wang D., Xu Y., Luo L. Preparation of mixed rare earths modified chitosan for fluoride adsorption. J. Rare Earths. 2013;31:817–822. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721(12)60364-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Davila-Rodriguez J.L., Escobar-Barrios V., Rangel-Mendez J.R. Removal of fluoride from drinking water by a chitin-based biocomposite in fixed-bed columns. J. Fluor. Chem. 2012;140:99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2012.05.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Swain S.K., Patnaik T., Patnaik P., Jha U., Dey R. Development of new alginate entrapped Fe(III)–Zr(IV) binary mixed oxide for removal of fluoride from water bodies. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;215-216:763–771. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Shams M., Nabizadeh Nodehi R., Hadi Dehghani M., Younesian M., Hossein Mahvia A. Efficiency of granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) for removal of fluoride from water. Fluoride. 2010;43:61–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Chai L., Wang Y., Zhao N., Yang W., You X. Sulfate-doped Fe3O4/Al2O3 nanoparticles as a novel adsorbent for fluoride removal from drinking water. Water Res. 2013;47:4040–4049. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Liu R., Gong W., Lan H., Yang T., Liu H., Qu J. Simultaneous removal of arsenate and fluoride by iron and aluminum binary oxide: Competitive adsorption effects. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012;92:100–105. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.García-Sánchez J., Solache-Ríos M., Miranda V.M., Morelos C.S. Removal of fluoride ions from drinking water and fluoride solutions by aluminum modified iron oxides in a column system. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;407:410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Kang D., Yu X., Tong S., Ge M., Zuo J., Cao C., Song W. Performance and mechanism of Mg/Fe layered double hydroxides for fluoride and arsenate removal from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;228:731–740. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Wu H.-X., Wang T.-J., Chen L., Jin Y., Zhang Y., Dou X.-M. Granulation of Fe–Al–Ce hydroxide nano-adsorbent by immobilization in porous polyvinyl alcohol for fluoride removal in drinking water. Powder Technol. 2011;209:92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.02.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Dou X., Zhang Y., Wang H., Wang T., Wang Y. Performance of granular zirconium–iron oxide in the removal of fluoride from drinking water. Water Res. 2011;45:3571–3578. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Viswanathan N., Prabhu S.M., Meenakshi S. Development of amine functionalized co-polymeric resins for selective fluoride sorption. J. Fluor. Chem. 2013;153:143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Ganvir V., Das K. Removal of fluoride from drinking water using aluminum hydroxide coated rice husk ash. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;185:1287–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Mourabet M., El Rhilassi A., El Boujaady H., Bennani-Ziatni M., El Hamri R., Taitai A. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by adsorption on hydroxyapatite (HAp) using response surface methodology. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015;19:603–615. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2012.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Mourabet M., El Rhilassi A., El Boujaady H., Bennani-Ziatni M., El Hamri R., Taitai A. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by adsorption on Apatitic tricalcium phosphate using Box–Behnken design and desirability function. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012;258:4402–4410. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Zhang D., Luo H., Zheng L., Wang K., Li H., Wang Y., Feng H. Utilization of waste phosphogypsum to prepare hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and its application towards removal of fluoride from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012;241–242:418–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Dou X., Mohan D., Pittman C.U., Yang S. Remediating fluoride from water using hydrous zirconium oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;198-199:236–245. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Swain S.K., Patnaik T., Singh V., Jha U., Patel R., Dey R. Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic aspects of removal of fluoride from drinking water using meso-structured zirconium phosphate. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;171:1218–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Poursaberi T., Hassanisadi M., Torkestani K., Zare M. Development of zirconium (IV)-metalloporphyrin grafted Fe3O4 nanoparticles for efficient fluoride removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;189-190:117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Swain S.K., Mishra S., Patnaik T., Patel R., Jha U., Dey R. Fluoride removal performance of a new hybrid sorbent of Zr(IV)–ethylenediamine. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;184:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Koilraj P., Kannan S. Aqueous fluoride removal using ZnCr layered double hydroxides and their polymeric composites: Batch and column studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;234:406–415. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Wang J., Xu W., Chen L., Jia Y., Wang L., Huang X.-J., Liu J. Excellent fluoride removal performance by CeO2–ZrO2 nanocages in water environment. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;231:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Chen L., Wang T.-J., Wu H.-X., Jin Y., Zhang Y., Dou X. Optimization of a Fe–Al–Ce nano-adsorbent granulation process that used spray coating in a fluidized bed for fluoride removal from drinking water. Powder Technol. 2011;206:291–296. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.09.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Zhao B., Zhang Y., Dou X., Wu X., Yang M. Granulation of Fe–Al–Ce trimetal hydroxide as a fluoride adsorbent using the extrusion method. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;185–186:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Sivasankar V., Murugesh S., Rajkumar S., Darchen A. Cerium dispersed in carbon (CeDC) and its adsorption behavior: A first example of tailored adsorbent for fluoride removal from drinking water. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;214:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Mandal S., Tripathy S., Padhi T., Sahu M.K., Patel R.K. Removal efficiency of fluoride by novel Mg-Cr-Cl layered double hydroxide by batch process from water. J. Environ. Sci. 2013;25:993–1000. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60146-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Zhang T., Li Q., Xiao H., Mei Z., Lu H., Zhou Y. Enhanced fluoride removal from water by non-thermal plasma modified CeO2/Mg–Fe layered double hydroxides. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013;72:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2012.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Wajima T., Umeta Y., Narita S., Sugawara K. Adsorption behavior of fluoride ions using a titanium hydroxide-derived adsorbent. Desalination. 2009;249:323–330. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.06.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Chen L., He B.-Y., He S., Wang T.-J., Su C.-L., Jin Y. Fe―Ti oxide nano-adsorbent synthesized by co-precipitation for fluoride removal from drinking water and its adsorption mechanism. Powder Technol. 2012;227:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.11.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Babaeivelni K., Khodadoust A.P. Adsorption of fluoride onto crystalline titanium dioxide: Effect of pH, ionic strength, and co-existing ions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;394:419–427. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.11.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Eskandarpour A., Onyango M.S., Ochieng A., Asai S. Removal of fluoride ions from aqueous solution at low pH using schwertmannite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;152:571–579. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Zhao Y., Li X., Liu L., Chen F. Fluoride removal by Fe(III)-loaded ligand exchange cotton cellulose adsorbent from drinking water. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008;72:144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.07.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Yu X., Tong S., Ge M., Zuo J. Removal of fluoride from drinking water by cellulose@hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;92:269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Gogoi P.K., Baruah R. Fluoride removal from water by adsorption on acid activated kaolinite clay. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 2008;15:500–503. [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Meenakshi S., Sundaram C.S., Sukumar R. Enhanced fluoride sorption by mechanochemically activated kaolinites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;153:164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Guo Q., Reardon E.J. Fluoride removal from water by meixnerite and its calcination product. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012;56:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2011.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Suzuki T., Nakamura A., Niinae M., Nakata H., Fujii H., Tasaka Y. Immobilization of fluoride in artificially contaminated kaolinite by the addition of commercial-grade magnesium oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;233:176–184. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Lebedynets M., Sprynskyy M., Sakhnyuk I., Zbytniewski R., Golembiewski R., Buszewski B. Adsorption of Ammonium Ions onto a Natural Zeolite: Transcarpathian Clinoptilolite. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2016;22:731–741. doi: 10.1260/0263617043026541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Erdem E., Karapinar N., Donat R. The removal of heavy metal cations by natural zeolites. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;280:309–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Rahmani A., Nouri J., Ghadiri S.K., Mahvi A., Zare M.R. Adsorption of fluoride from water by Al3+ and Fe3+ pretreated natural Iranian zeolites. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2010;4:607–614. doi: 10.22059/IJER.2010.246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Wang S., Peng Y. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010;156:11–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Sun Y., Fang Q., Dong J., Cheng X., Xu J. Removal of fluoride from drinking water by natural stilbite zeolite modified with Fe(III) Desalination. 2011;277:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Gómez-Hortigüela L., Pérez-Pariente J., García R., Chebude Y., Díaz I. Natural zeolites from Ethiopia for elimination of fluoride from drinking water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013;120:224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Sasaki K., Fukumoto N., Moriyama S., Yu Q., Hirajima T. Chemical regeneration of magnesium oxide used as a sorbent for fluoride. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012;98:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.07.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Tor A., Danaoglu N., Arslan G., Cengeloglu Y. Removal of fluoride from water by using granular red mud: Batch and column studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;164:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Ning W., Zhao-Kun L., Jun W., Li S., Ying Z., Jie-Wei W. Preparation of Modified Red Mud with Aluminum and Its Adsorption Characteristics on Fluoride Removal. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009;25:849–854. [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Lv G., Wu L., Liao L., Zhang Y., Li Z. Preparation and characterization of red mud sintered porous materials for water defluoridation. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013;74:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2012.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Tor A., Danaoglu N., Arslan G., Cengeloglu Y. Removal of Fluoride From Drinking Water Using Red Mud Introduction. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2013;2:120–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Zhu S., Zhu D., Wang X. Removal of fluorine from red mud (bauxite residue) by electrokinetics. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;242:300–306. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Kemer B., Ozdes D., Gundogdu A., Bulut V.N., Duran C., Soylak M. Removal of fluoride ions from aqueous solution by waste mud. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;168:888–894. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Sujana M., Thakur R., Rao S. Removal of Fluoride from Aqueous Solution by Using Alum Sludge. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;206:94–101. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Nigussie W., Zewge F., Chandravanshi B. Removal of excess fluoride from water using waste residue from alum manufacturing process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007;147:954–963. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Mahramanlioglu M., Kizilcikli I., Bicer I.O. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by acid treated spent bleaching earth. J. Fluor. Chem. 2002;115:41–47. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1139(02)00003-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Malakootian M., Fatehizadeh A., Yousefi N., Ahmadian M., Moosazadeh M. Fluoride removal using Regenerated Spent Bleaching Earth (RSBE) from groundwater: Case study on Kuhbonan water. Desalination. 2011;277:244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Nemade P.D., Vasudeva Rao A., Alappat B.J. Removal of fluorides from water using low cost adsorbents. Water Supply. 2002;2:311–317. doi: 10.2166/ws.2002.0037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Xue Y., Hou H., Zhu S., Zha J. Utilization of municipal solid waste incineration ash in stone mastic asphalt mixture: Pavement performance and environmental impact. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009;23:989–996. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Geethamani C., Ramesh S., Gandhimathi R., Nidheesh P. Alkali-treated fly ash for the removal of fluoride from aqueous solutions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013;52:3466–3476. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.800825. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Ramesh S., Gandhimathi R., Nidheesh P., Taywade M. Batch and Column Operations for the Removal of Fluoride from Aqueous Solution Using Bottom Ash. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 2012;60:12–20. doi: 10.5755/j01.erem.60.2.1396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Zhang G., Sun G., Chen Z., Evrendilek F., Liu J. Water-soluble fluorine detoxification mechanisms of spent potlining incineration in response to calcium compounds. Environ. Pollut. 2020;266:115420. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Xu X., Li Q., Cui H., Pang J., An H., Wang W., Zhai J. Column-mode fluoride removal from aqueous solution by magnesia-loaded fly ash cenospheres. Environ. Technol. 2012;33:1409–1415. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.630424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Mondal N.K., Bhaumik R., Baur T., Das B., Roy P., Datta P.R.A.J.K. Studies on Defluoridation of Water by Tea Ash: An Unconventional Biosorbent. Chem. Sci. Trans. 2012;1:239–256. doi: 10.7598/cst2012.134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Gupta N., Gupta V., Singh A.P., Singh R.P. Defluoridation of Groundwater using Low Cost Adsorbent like Bagasse Dust, Aluminium Treated Bagasse Flyash, Bone Powder and Shell Powder. Bonfring Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Sci. 2014;4:72–75. doi: 10.9756/bijiems.10299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Jadhav A.S., Jadhav M.V. Use of Maize Husk Fly Ash as an Adsorbent for Removal of Fluoride from Water. [(accessed on 25 July 2021)];Int. J. Recent Dev. Eng. Technol. 2014 2:2. Available online: www.ijrdet.com. [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Gupta V.K., Ali I., Saini V.K. Defluoridation of wastewaters using waste carbon slurry. Water Res. 2007;41:3307–3316. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Cinarli A., Bicer O., Mahramanlioglu M. Removal of fluoride using the adsorbents produced from mining waste. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2005;14:520–525. [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Kumari M., Adhikari K., Dutta S. India Water Week-Efficient Water Management: Challenges and Opportunities. Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources; New Delhi, India: 2013. Fluoride removal using shale: A mine waste; p. 157. [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Islam M., Patel R. Thermal activation of basic oxygen furnace slag and evaluation of its fluoride removal efficiency. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;169:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Lai Y.D., Liu J.C. Fluoride Removal from Water with Spent Catalyst. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1996;31:2791–2803. doi: 10.1080/01496399608000827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Tsai C.Y., Liu J.C. Fluoride removal from water with iron-coated spent catalyst. Chinese J. Environ. Eng. 1999;9:107–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Das N., Pattanaik P., Das R. Defluoridation of drinking water using activated titanium rich bauxite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;292:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Chaudhari V.S., Sasane V.V. Investigation of Optimum Operating Parameters for Removal of Fluoride Using Naturally Available Geomaterial. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2014;3:2123–2128. [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Kang W.-H., Kim E.-I., Park J.-Y. Fluoride removal capacity of cement paste. Desalination. 2007;202:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Oguz E. Equilibrium isotherms and kinetics studies for the sorption of fluoride on light weight concrete materials. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007;295:258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Kagne S., Jagtap S., Dhawade P., Kamble S., Devotta S., Rayalu S. Hydrated cement: A promising adsorbent for the removal of fluoride from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;154:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Ayoob S., Gupta A. Insights into isotherm making in the sorptive removal of fluoride from drinking water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;152:976–985. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Gao S., Cui J., Wei Z. Study on the fluoride adsorption of various apatite materials in aqueous solution. J. Fluor. Chem. 2009;130:1035–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2009.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Gao S., Sun R., Wei Z., Zhao H., Li H., Hu F., Gao S., Sun R. Size-dependent defluoridation ultrasonic and microwave combined technique. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;185:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Poinern G.E.J., Ghosh M.K., Ng Y.-J., Issa T.B., Anand S., Singh P. Defluoridation behavior of nanostructured hydroxyapatite synthesized through an ultrasonic and microwave combined technique. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;185:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Wang Y., Chen N., Wei W., Cui J., Wei Z. Enhanced adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution onto nanosized hydroxyapatite by low-molecular-weight organic acids. Desalination. 2011;276:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Nie Y., Hu C., Kong C. Enhanced fluoride adsorption using Al (III) modified calcium hydroxyapatite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012;233–234:194–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Cheng H. Reuse Research Progress on Waste Clay Brick. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016;31:218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Kagne S., Jagtap S., Thakare D., Devotta S., Rayalu S.S. Bleaching powder: A versatile adsorbent for the removal of fluoride from aqueous solution. Desalination. 2009;243:22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Chen N., Zhang Z., Feng C., Li M., Zhu D., Chen R., Sugiura N. An excellent fluoride sorption behavior of ceramic adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;183:460–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Bibi S., Farooqi A., Hussain K., Haider N. Evaluation of industrial based adsorbents for simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride from drinking water. J. Clean. Prod. 2015;87:882–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Krysztafkiewicz A., Rager B., Maik M. Silica recovery from waste obtained in hydrofluoric acid and aluminum fluoride production from fluosilicic acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 1996;48:31–49. doi: 10.1016/0304-3894(95)00126-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Alusilica|Alufluor. [(accessed on 1 February 2018)]. Available online: https://www.alufluor.com/alusilica/
  • 257.Şener Ş., Sener E., Karagüzel R. Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: A case study in Senirkent–Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010;173:533–554. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1403-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Kaminskas R., Kubiliūtė R. Artificial pozzolana from silica gel waste–clay–limestone composite. Adv. Cem. Res. 2014;26:155–168. doi: 10.1680/adcr.13.00027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Li X., He S., Feng C., Zhu Y., Pang Y., Hou J., Luo K., Liao X. Non-Competitive and Competitive Adsorption of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ Ions onto SDS in Process of Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Sustainability. 2018;10:92. doi: 10.3390/su10010092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Zhu Y., Du X., Gao C., Yu Z. Adsorption Behavior of Inorganic and Organic Phosphate by Iron Manganese Plaques on Reed Roots in Wetlands. Sustainability. 2018;10:4578. doi: 10.3390/su10124578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Chen L., Chen Q., Rao P., Yan L., Shakib A., Shen G. Formulating and Optimizing a Novel Biochar-Based Fertilizer for Simultaneous Slow-Release of Nitrogen and Immobilization of Cadmium. Sustainability. 2018;10:2740. doi: 10.3390/su10082740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Zhang X., Wang X.-Q., Wang D.-F. Immobilization of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge during Land Application Process in China: A Review. Sustainability. 2017;9:2020. doi: 10.3390/su9112020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Kim J., Tae S., Kim R. Theoretical Study on the Production of Environment-Friendly Recycled Cement Using Inorganic Construction Wastes as Secondary Materials in South Korea. Sustainability. 2018;10:4449. doi: 10.3390/su10124449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Kurosaki H. Reduction of Fluorine-containing Industrial Waste Using Aluminum-solubility Method. Oki Tech. Rev. 1998;63:53–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Adhikari S., Kayastha M.S., Ghimire D.C., Aryal H.R., Adhikary S., Takeuchi T., Murakami K., Kawashimo Y., Uchida H., Wakita K., et al. Improved Photovoltaic Properties of Heterojunction Carbon Based Solar Cell. J. Surf. Eng. Mater. Adv. Technol. 2013;3:178–183. doi: 10.4236/jsemat.2013.33024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Seshan H. Handbook of Thin—Film Deposition Processes and Techniques. 2nd ed. Noyes Publications; Park Ridge, NJ, USA: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Zueva S.B., BIrloaga I., Ferella F., Baturina E.V., Corradini V., Veglio F. Mitigation of Fluorine-Containing Waste Resulting from Chemical Vapour Deposition Used In Manufacturing Of Silicon Solar Cells. Processes. 2021;9:1745. doi: 10.3390/pr9101745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Aldaco R., Garea A., Irabien A. Calcium fluoride recovery from fluoride wastewater in a fluidized bed reactor. Water Res. 2007;41:810–818. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Shin C.-H., Kim J.-Y., Kim J.-Y., Kim H.-S., Lee H.-S., Mohapatra D., Ahn J.-W., Ahn J.-G., Bae W. A solvent extraction approach to recover acetic acid from mixed waste acids produced during semiconductor wafer process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;162:1278–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Lee T.-C., Liu F.-J. Recovery of hazardous semiconductor-industry sludge as a useful resource. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;165:359–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Lee T.-C., Lin K.-L., Su X.-W., Lin K.-K. Recycling CMP sludge as a resource in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012;30:243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Da Y., He T., Shi C., Wang M., Feng Y. Potential of preparing cement clinker by adding the fluorine-containing sludge into raw meal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021;403:123692. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Olejarczyk M., Urbaniak W., Rykowska I. Wapno posodowe jako składnik sorbentów jonów fluorkowych; Proceedings of the II Ogólnopolska Przyrodnicza Konferencja Naukowa “Mater naturae”; Online. 11 December 2020; pp. 41–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Wajima T., Rakovan J.F. Removal of fluoride ions using calcined paper sludge. J. Therm. Anal. 2013;113:1027–1035. doi: 10.1007/s10973-012-2897-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Frías M., García R., Vigil R., Ferreiro S. Calcination of art paper sludge waste for the use as a supplementary cementing material. Appl. Clay Sci. 2008;42:189–193. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2008.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Henry C.L. Nitrogen Dynamics of Pulp and Paper Sludge Amendment to Forest Soils. Water Sci. Technol. 1991;24:417–425. doi: 10.2166/wst.1991.0498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Tripepi R.R., Zhang X., Campbell A.G. Use of Raw and Composted Paper Sludge as a Soil Additive or Mulch for Cottonwood Plants. Compos. Sci. Util. 1996;4:26–36. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.1996.10701827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Dell’Abate M.T., Benedetti A., Sequi P. Thermal Methods of Organic Matter Maturation Monitoring During a Composting Process. J. Therm. Anal. 2000;61:389–396. doi: 10.1023/A:1010157115211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Barriga S., Méndez A., Cámara J., Guerrero F., Gascó G. Agricultural valorisation of de-inking paper sludge as organic amendment in different soils: Thermal study. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010;99:981–986. doi: 10.1007/s10973-010-0692-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Méndez A., Barriga S., Guerrero F., Gascó G. Thermal analysis of growing media obtained from mixtures of paper mill waste materials and sewage sludge. J. Therm. Anal. 2010;104:213–221. doi: 10.1007/s10973-010-1227-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Rodríguez O., Frías M., de Rojas M.I.S. Influence of the calcined paper sludge on the development of hydration heat in blended cement mortars. J. Therm. Anal. 2008;92:865–871. doi: 10.1007/s10973-007-8270-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Melo C.R., Angioletto E., Riella H.G., Peterson M., Rocha M.R., Melo A.R., Silva L., Strugale S. Production of metakaolin from industrial cellulose waste. J. Therm. Anal. 2012;109:1341–1345. doi: 10.1007/s10973-011-1892-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Król D., Poskrobko S. Waste and fuels from waste Part, I. Analysis of thermal decomposition. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012;109:619–628. doi: 10.1007/s10973-012-2397-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Taş S., Yürüm Y. Co-firing of biomass with coals: Part 2. Thermogravimetric kinetic analysis of co-combustion of fir (Abies bornmulleriana) wood with Beypazari lignite. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012;107:293–298. doi: 10.1007/s10973-010-1281-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Méndez A., Barriga S., Saa A., Gascó G. Removal of malachite green by adsorbents from paper industry waste materials: Thermal analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010;99:993–998. doi: 10.1007/s10973-010-0681-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Olejarczyk M., Urbaniak W., Rykowska I. Reclamation materials based on post-soda lime. In: Kołwzan B., Bukowski Z., editors. Practical Aspects of Remediation, Recultivation and Revitalization. Publishing House UKW; Bydgoszcz, Poland: 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Waciński W., Olejarczyk M., Urbaniak W., Rykowska I. Sorbent, especially for removing aqueous solutions of ions in the form of sparingly soluble salts and how it is maintained. Pol. Pat. Appl. 2022:440956. [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Waciński W., Olejarczyk M., Urbaniak W., Rykowska I. Method of removing fluoride ions from contaminated waters, especially sewage. Pol. Pat. Appl. 2022:440957. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Materials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES