Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1999 Jul;65(7):3258–3260. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.7.3258-3260.1999

Influence of 1-[(E)-2-(2-Methyl-4-Nitrophenyl)Diaz-1-enyl]Pyrrolidine-2-Carboxylic Acid and Diphenyliodonium Chloride on Ruminal Protein Metabolism and Ruminal Microorganisms

Fabienne Floret 1, Lal C Chaudhary 2, William C Ellis 3, Suliman El Hassan 4, Nest McKain 1, C James Newbold 1, R John Wallace 1,*
PMCID: PMC91486  PMID: 10388733

Abstract

The effects of 1-[(E)-2-(2-methyl-4-nitrophenyl)diaz-1-enyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid (LY29) and diphenyliodonium chloride (DIC) on the degradation of protein to ammonia were determined in a mixed rumen microbial population taken from sheep on a grass hay-concentrate diet. Both compounds decreased NH3 production by inhibiting deamination of amino acids. LY29, but not DIC, inhibited growth of the high-activity ammonia-producing species, Clostridium aminophilum and Clostridium sticklandii.


Ruminant animals are exceptionally inefficient in their retention of nitrogen under conditions where the diet contains protein which can be fermented rapidly in the rumen (8). Protein is converted via peptides and amino acids to NH3, which can be incorporated by ruminal microorganisms, but which, when present in excess, is absorbed rapidly across the ruminal wall (9). Proteolysis is carried out by many ruminal species (10, 19), and large variation between individual animals occurs (5). Peptide catabolism is for the most part a two-step process, whereby oligopeptides are first cleaved to dipeptides and then broken down by dipeptidases to amino acids (5, 15). The released amino acids are then deaminated by ciliate protozoa (16) and two categories of ruminal bacteria: the first category is comprised of many of the most numerous species of ruminal bacteria, which possess a low deaminative activity, and the second category is comprised of a much smaller population of so-called hyper-ammonia-producing (HAP) bacteria (1), which have much higher deaminative activity and which are believed to rely on amino acids rather than sugars for energy generation (1, 1113). Inhibition of any of these catabolic steps would benefit nitrogen retention in ruminal fermentation. The aims of this study were to determine the site of action of 1-[(E)-2-(2-methyl-4-nitrophenyl)diaz-1-enyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid (LY29) which, when added to steer rations, appeared to enhance nitrogen flow from the rumen (21), and to compare its antimicrobial effects with those of a known deaminase inhibitor, diphenyliodonium chloride (DIC) (3, 4).

LY29 was synthesized by the reaction of diazotized 2-methyl-4-nitroaniline with l-proline in alkaline solution. Thirty grams of 2-methyl-4-nitroaniline was added to an ice-cold solution of 75 ml of concentrated HCl in 400 ml of distilled water. Sodium nitrite was added as 100 ml of an ice-cold 30% aqueous solution, followed by 1 g of diatomaceous earth. The solution of diazotized 2-methyl-4-nitroaniline was filtered through Whatman no. 1 filter paper and kept on ice. One hundred and twenty-five grams of NaCO3 and 75 g of NaCl were added to 450 ml of ice-cold water, followed by 42.6 g of l-proline, and then the solution of diazotized 2-methyl-4-nitroaniline was added dropwise, with constant mixing, over a period of 30 min. The solution was then taken to pH 4.5 by adding HCl, and the precipitate was collected by filtration and freeze-dried. Its structure was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The experiments described here were done with a single batch of LY29 provided by Elanco Animal Health, Indianapolis, Ind. DIC was from Aldrich.

Four ruminally cannulated adult sheep received a mixed diet (500, 299.5, 100, 91, and 9.5 g/kg of dry matter of hay, barley, molasses, fish meal, and minerals and vitamins, respectively) fed in equal meals of 500 g daily at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Samples of rumen fluid were removed 3 h after the morning feeding. The rumen fluid was kept warm and was strained through linen cloth before use. Incubations were carried out under O2-free CO2 in Hungate tubes at 39°C. Aliquots (7.5 ml) of ruminal fluid were added to the tubes, which already contained 7.5 μl of ethanol or 7.5 μl of ethanol containing 2 or 10 mM LY29 or DIC, in combination with either no added nitrogen source or 0.15 g of Trypticase (BBL, Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.), a pancreatic hydrolysate of casein containing mainly peptides, or 0.15 g of casein acid hydrolysate, containing mainly free amino acids (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom). One-milliliter samples were removed at 2-h intervals up to 8 h. The samples were added to 0.25 ml of 25% trichloroacetic acid and cooled to 4°C. Pellets from trichloroacetic acid-treated samples were obtained by centrifuging at 28,000 × g for 15 min. Ammonia was measured by the phenol-hypochlorite method adapted from Whitehead et al. (20). Ammonia release was linear over the sampling period, so rates of ammonia release were calculated by linear regression.

Proteinase and peptidase activities were measured by using mixed ruminal bacteria from the same sheep, prepared by straining and centrifuging at 200 × g for 15 min in order to remove ciliate protozoa. Proteinase activity used 14C-labelled casein as previously described with whole bacteria (14), while peptidase assays used p-nitroanilide (pNA) substrates and sonicated bacteria, with protein being determined as described previously (17). The bacteriolytic activity of ruminal ciliate protozoa was measured by the rate of breakdown of [14C]leucine-labelled Selenomonas ruminantium in strained ruminal fluid (18).

Twenty different species of ruminal bacteria were examined for their sensitivities to 10 μM LY29 and 10 μM DIC. The source of most of the strains was given previously (2, 17), providing Anaerovibrio lipolytica 5S, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens SH13, Eubacterium ruminantium 2388, Fibrobacter succinogenes S85, Lachnospira multipara D15d, Megasphaera elsdenii J1, Mitsuokella multiacidus 46/5, Prevotella albensis M384, Prevotella bryantii B14, Prevotella brevis GA33, Prevotella ruminicola 23, Ruminobacter amylophilus WP225, Ruminococcus albus SY3, Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD1, S. ruminantium Z108, Streptococcus bovis ES1, and Veillonella parvula L59. Clostridium aminophilum (ATCC 49906), Clostridium sticklandii (ATCC 12662), and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (ATCC 27337) were obtained from culture collections. The anaerobic growth medium was the liquid form of Hobson’s ruminal fluid-containing medium 2 (7), except for the growth medium for C. aminophilum, C. sticklandii, and P. anaerobius, which was basal M2 medium with no added sugars or lactate, with Trypticase added to a final concentration of 15 g/liter, as used in the cultivation of HAP bacteria (13). Cultivation was carried out in anaerobic Hungate culture tubes, and growth was measured by optical density at 650 nm. Growth experiments were done in triplicate with 5% inoculum volumes.

The rate of NH3 production from Trypticase was 28% greater than the rate of NH3 production from casein acid hydrolysate when strained ruminal fluid was incubated with Trypticase or casein acid hydrolysate in vitro (Table 1). LY29 and DIC both inhibited NH3 production from Trypticase, by 17 and 28%, respectively, at inhibitor concentrations of 10 μM. This concentration was calculated to approximate likely ruminal fluid concentrations arising from effective feed inclusions of 50 ppm of DIC in 213-kg steers consuming 3.7 kg of dry matter per day (4) and 1 mg of LY29/kg of body weight in calves (21). NH3 production from casein acid hydrolysate was also inhibited, by 17 and 37% by LY29 and DIC, respectively. Proteinase activity was unaffected by LY29 or DIC, and the main peptidase activities were unaffected, except for a small (<10%) inhibition of GlyPro-pNA breakdown (dipeptidyl peptidase IV) (Table 2). LY29 had no effect on the bacteriolytic activity of protozoa, whereas DIC tended to decrease protozoal activity slightly (Table 2). It was concluded, therefore, that effects on nitrogen flow in vivo (4, 21) and NH3 production in vitro (Table 1) must have resulted mainly from inhibition of the final step in the breakdown pathway, namely the deamination of amino acids.

TABLE 1.

Influence of LY29 and DIC on rate of production of ammonia from peptides and amino acids by mixed ruminal microorganisms

Additive Rate of NH3 production (μmol h−1 ml of ruminal fluid−1)a
Control DIC (μM)
LY29 (μM)
SEb
2 10 2 10
Trypticase 3.50 C 3.33 BC 2.51 A 3.53 C 2.90 AB 0.204
Casein acid hydrolysate 2.53 C 1.82 AB 1.59 AB 2.17 BC 2.10 AB 0.235
a

Results are means obtained with samples from four sheep on a mixed grass hay-concentrate diet. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). 

TABLE 2.

Influence of LY29 and DIC on proteinase and peptidase activities of mixed ruminal microorganisms and on bacteriolytic activity of mixed ruminal protozoa

Substrate Rate of breakdowna
Control DIC (μM)
LY29 (μM)
SE
2 10 2 10
Proteinase activity (mg of 14C-casein hydrolyzed h−1 mg of protein−1) 0.124 0.120 0.122 0.124 0.124 0.002
Peptidase activity (nmol min−1 mg of protein−1)
 GlyArg-pNA 1.06 1.02 1.13 1.03 1.04 0.041
 GlyPro-pNA 2.57 C 2.42 A 2.35 A 2.45 B 2.34 A 0.041
 Ala2-pNA 5.78 5.57 5.64 5.73 5.47 0.098
 Leu-pNA 0.19 0.21 0.24 0.20 0.18 0.024
 Pro-pNA 0.96 0.98 0.96 1.02 0.99 0.043
Bacteriolytic activity of protozoa (% breakdown of S. ruminantium h−1)b 6.62 6.23 5.99 6.28 6.41 0.36
a

Results are means obtained with samples from four sheep on a mixed grass hay-concentrate diet. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). 

b

Bacteriolytic activity was measured in only two of the sheep. 

DIC did not inhibit the growth of any of the pure cultures of ruminal bacteria in 24-h incubations. The growth rate of C. sticklandii was decreased slightly, however, at 10 μM DIC (0.27 ± 0.03 h−1 versus 0.39 ± 0.02 h−1 in controls). LY29 at 10 μM prevented growth of C. aminophilum, C. sticklandii, and R. flavefaciens at 24 h and suppressed the yield at 24 h of some other species, notably A. lipolytica. Thus, the mode of action of LY29 appears to be different from the mode of action of DIC and may involve suppression of certain HAP bacteria. The structure of LY29 as a modified amino acid suggests that it may be a substrate analogue for amino acid deamination. DIC is thought to interfere with NADH metabolism (3).

The present results therefore identify the likely mode of action of a novel feed additive, LY29. LY29 principally affects deamination of amino acids by suppressing HAP bacteria. Its effect on NH3 production in these sheep is relatively small (as illustrated in Table 1), but ruminants on different diets might have larger HAP populations and hence give greater responses to LY29. However, LY29 is selectively antibacterial. Given recent concerns about the spread of antibiotic resistance, and the finding that one of the bacteria inhibited by LY29 is an important cellulolytic species, it may be preferable to develop DIC rather than LY29 as a feed additive for improving nitrogen retention in ruminants.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nicola Walker and David Brown for their contributions to the microbiological and chemical analysis of LY29.

Visits to the Rowett Research Institute by L.C.C. and S.E.H. were funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the British Council, respectively. F.F. received support from AMOPA and the LEONARDO funds of the European Union. The Rowett Research Institute receives its core funding from the Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries Department.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Attwood G T, Klieve A V, Ouwerkerk D, Patel B K C. Ammonia-hyperproducing bacteria from New Zealand ruminants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:1796–1804. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.5.1796-1804.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Avguštin G, Wallace R J, Flint H J. Phenotypic diversity among ruminal isolates of Prevotella ruminicola: proposal of Prevotella brevis sp. nov., Prevotella bryantii sp. nov., and Prevotella albensis sp. nov. and redefinition of Prevotella ruminicola. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:284–288. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-2-284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chalupa W. Chemical control of rumen microbial metabolism. In: Ruckebusch Y, Thivend P, editors. Digestive physiology and metabolism in ruminants. Lancaster, England: MTP Press; 1980. pp. 325–347. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chalupa W, Patterson J A, Parish R C, Chow A W. Effects of diaryliodonium compounds on nitrogen metabolism in growing steers. J Anim Sci. 1983;57:195–200. doi: 10.2527/jas1983.571195x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Depardon N, Debroas D, Blanchart G. Breakdown of peptides from a casein hydrolysate by rumen bacteria. Simultaneous study of enzyme activities and physicochemical parameters. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1996;36:457–466. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19960501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Falconer M L, Wallace R J. Variation in proteinase activities in the rumen. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84:377–382. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hobson P N. Rumen bacteria. Methods Microbiol. 1969;3B:133–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leng R A, Nolan J V. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67:1072–1089. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81409-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mathison G W, Milligan L P. Nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Br J Nutr. 1971;25:351–366. doi: 10.1079/bjn19710100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morrison M, Mackie R I. Nitrogen metabolism by ruminal microorganisms: current understanding and future perspectives. Aust J Agric Res. 1996;47:227–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Paster B J, Russell J B, Yang C M J, Chow J M, Woese C R, Tanner R. Phylogeny of the ammonia-producing ruminal bacteria Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Clostridium sticklandii and Clostridium aminophilum sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43:107–110. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-1-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Russell J B, Onodera R, Hino T. Ruminal protein fermentation: new perspectives on previous contradictions. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R, editors. Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1991. pp. 681–697. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Russell J B, Strobel H J, Chen G. Enrichment and isolation of a ruminal bacterium with a very high specific activity of ammonia production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:872–877. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.4.872-877.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wallace R J. Hydrolysis of 14C-labelled proteins by rumen micro-organisms and by proteolytic enzymes prepared from rumen bacteria. Br J Nutr. 1983;50:345–355. doi: 10.1079/bjn19830102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wallace R J. Rumen microbial metabolism of peptides and amino acids. J Nutr. 1996;126:1326S–1334S. doi: 10.1093/jn/126.suppl_4.1326S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wallace R J, Broderick G A, Brammall M L. Microbial protein and peptide metabolism in rumen fluid from faunated and ciliate-free sheep. Br J Nutr. 1987;58:87–93. doi: 10.1079/bjn19870072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wallace R J, McKain N. A survey of peptidase activity in rumen bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1991;137:2259–2264. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-9-2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wallace R J, McPherson C A. Factors affecting the rate of breakdown of bacterial protein in rumen fluid. Br J Nutr. 1987;58:313–323. doi: 10.1079/bjn19870098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wallace R J, Onodera R, Cotta M A. Metabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds. In: Hobson P N, Stewart C S, editors. The rumen microbial ecosystem. London, England: Chapman & Hall; 1997. pp. 283–328. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Whitehead R, Cooke G H, Chapman B T. Problems associated with the continuous monitoring of ammoniacal nitrogen in river water. Automat Analytic Chem. 1967;2:377–380. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ysunda F. In vivo effects of limiting ruminal protein catabolism. Ph.D. dissertation. College Station, Tex: Texas A & M University; 1994. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES