Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 May 16;24(20):3636–3641. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01169

Development of Geometry-Controlled All-Orthogonal BODIPY Trimers for Photodynamic Therapy and Phototheragnosis

Alejandro Prieto-Castañeda †, Fernando García-Garrido †, Carolina Díaz-Norambuena ‡, Blanca Escriche-Navarro §,∥,⊥, Alba García-Fernández §,⊥,#, Jorge Bañuelos ‡,*, Esther Rebollar ∇, Inmaculada García-Moreno ∇, Ramón Martínez-Máñez §,∥,⊥,#,*, Santiago de la Moya †, Antonia R Agarrabeitia †,@, María J Ortiz †,*
PMCID: PMC9150176  PMID: 35575720

Abstract

graphic file with name ol2c01169_0007.jpg

We have established an easy synthetic protocol for selectively developing all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers with unprecedented geometries on the basis of selecting methyl oxidation versus electrophilic formylation of key dimeric precursors. Photophysical characterization together with biological assays unraveled the most suitable BODIPY–BODIPY geometrical arrangements within the trimer, forcing them to serve as molecular platforms for the development of new, advanced heavy-atom-free photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy and phototheragnosis.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive and clinically approved procedure based on the synergistic action of three elements: (i) a photoactivatable agent, the PDT photosensitizer (PS), (ii) light of a specific energy, and (iii) molecular oxygen. These three elements are not toxic by themselves, but their combination triggers a toxic effect on the basis of the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS).1,2 Since its clinical approval in 1993, PDT has proven its efficacy in the treatment of multiple diseases related to high rates of cell proliferation and, especially, in the treatment of neoplastic diseases.1 However, the clinical application of PDT as a cancer first-line treatment remains limited and not fully exploited. For this reason, there are currently numerous investigations focused on improving the performance of PDT treatments and agents.2

The combination of PDT with diagnostic imaging leads to phototheragnosis, in which a single agent enables such dual phototriggered activity.3 It must be noted here that theragnosis constitutes a growing area of research, being considered one of the most promising precision medicine procedures, mainly in cancer.4 However, combining both capacities (PDT and imaging) in a biocompatible, simple, monochromophoric system is not easy, because the photonic properties required for each capacity are antagonistic (the higher the fluorescence efficiency, the lower the level of ROS photogeneration).2,4 Therefore, both key properties must be finely balanced to allow simultaneous fluorescence signaling for diagnosis and ROS-based cytotoxicity for PDT.5 In this scenario, the design of advanced phototheragnostic agents is one of the most challenging goals of modern biomaterials science.5

Among the most promising monochomophoric platforms for developing smarter PS for PDT and phototheragnosis, BODIPY dyes are at the forefront. These versatile fluorophores6 generally exhibit a negligible triplet state population due to their high quantum fluorescence yield; however, linking heavy atoms to the BODIPY structure is a facile approach for promoting the required intersystem crossing (ISC) populating the triplet manifold involved in ROS (singlet oxygen) formation.7 In this context, an appealing alternative to the use of heavy atoms is the design of orthogonal BODIPY dimers, because they are well-known efficient singlet oxygen photogenerators.8 Indeed, several orthogonal dimers have been reported to be PDT agents, mainly involving the 2–8′ BODIPY–BODIPY linkage,8 and less often the 3–8′ one (Figure 1a).9 On the contrary, all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers are rather scarce,10 and their performance as PSs for PDT has still not been fully explored (Figure 1b).10b,10c

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Existing (a) orthogonal BODIPY dimers and (b) all-orthogonal trimers and (c) new all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers developed in this work.

To address this gap and fully unlock the capabilities of all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers, we focused our attention on the possibility of obtaining trimers with different geometries (see Figure 1c) and studying the influence of these geometries (different BODIPY–BODIPY arrangements in the trimer) on the generation of singlet oxygen and fluorescent emission, to determine the privileged new molecular platforms for the development of advanced PDT and phototheragnostic agents. In this context, we hypothesized that a straightforward procedure for accessing all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers could be via regioselective formylation of dimeric precursors. It must be noted here that 2-formylBODIPYs can be straightforwardly and regioselectively obtained by Vilsmeier–Haack reaction,11 and recently, we have described an alternative method that allows easy access to 3-formylBODIPYs by oxidation of 3-methylBODIPYs using pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC).9b

Taking into account both possibilities (2-formylBODIPYs by electrophilic formylation vs 3-formylBODIPYs by methyl oxidation), we report here a comparative study of the application of both strategies to the preparation of formylBODIPY-based dimers involving different BODIPY–BODIPY linkages (2–8′ and 3–8′), as key synthetic precursors of unprecedented all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers, because they could serve as advantageous platforms for the development of advanced heavy-atom-free PDT and phototheragnostic agents.

Thus, we first studied the PCC-promoted oxidation of methyl groups in the 2–8′ dimers 1a,121b and 1c, and 1d,13 bearing an electron-donating meso-methyl (1a) or a meso-phenyl group of different electron richness in one of their BODIPY subunits (mesityl in 1b, 4-methoxyphenyl in 1c, or 4-nitrophenyl in 1d). In all cases, 3-formylBODIPY-based dimers (see 2a–d in Scheme 1A) were obtained in 54–64% yield. Interestingly, methyl oxidation exclusively took place at position 3 (3-methyl group) of the BODIPY subunit bearing a BODIPY rest at its meso position, regardless of the meso substitution of the other BODIPY subunit. These results constitute the first examples of regioselective mono-oxidation of 3-methylBODIPY-based dimers by PCC, expanding the interest in this reaction in the BODIPY chemistry field.9b

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Mono-formylated Orthogonal BODIPY Dimers by (i) PCC Oxidation or (ii) Electrophilic Formylation with POCl3/DMF.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

On the contrary, the electrophilic formylation of the same dimers (1a, 1b and 1c, and 1d) with POCl3/DMF was also studied. In this case, the reaction takes place at the BODIPY subunit bearing a BODIPY rest at its meso position, too, to generate 2-formylBODIPY-based dimers 3a–d (Scheme 1A) in >80% yields. This regioselectivity agrees with the findings of Akkaya et al. in the up-to-now unique formylation of an orthogonal BODIPY dimer.10a

To further investigate the scope of the PCC oxidation of methylated BODIPY dimers, we selected the oxidation of dimer 4 (Scheme 1B), in which the reaction can take place only at the BODIPY subunit without a BODIPY rest at meso. In this specific case, methyl oxidation also occurs, but yielding a mixture of products (5a and 5b) with low yield and regioselectivity (24% and 11%, respectively).

All of these results prompted us to extend the investigation of the application of both reactions, PCC methyl oxidation versus POCl3/DMF formylation, to two additional BODIPY dimers involving the uncommon 3–8′ linkage (6a and 6b in Scheme 1C). To our satisfaction, the regioselectivity found in the PCC oxidation and POCl3/DMF formylation of the 2–8′-linked dimers 1a–d is maintained in the 3–8′-linked dimers 6a and 6b to generate 3-formylBODIPY-based dimers 7a and 7b, respectively (by oxidation; 46% and 39% yields, respectively), and 2-formylBODIPY-based dimers 8a and 8b, respectively (by formylation; 64% and 78% yield, respectively) (see Scheme 1C). It must be remarked that 7a, 7b, 8a, and 8b are the first examples of formylated orthogonal BODIPY dimers involving the 3–8′ linkage. On the contrary, it should be noted that the position of the formyl group in all of the obtained formylated dimers was unequivocally established by one-dimensional NOESY experiments (e.g., see Figures S1–S5).

The obtained formylated BODIPY dimers should pave the way for all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers with different geometries upon standard BODIPY-core formation from formyl groups. To explore this possibility, we selected meso-mesitylated dimers 2b, 3b, 7b, and 8b (see Scheme 1), due to the known high photostability promoted by meso-mesitylation in BODIPY fluorophores.14 Satisfactorily, condensation of 2b, 3b, 7b, and 8b with 2,4-dimethylpyrrole in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), followed by oxidation with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ), and final complexation with BF3·OEt2/triethylamine (standard BODIPY-core formation) gave rise to trimers 9–12, respectively, in low to moderate yields (see Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Synthesis of All-Orthogonal BODIPY Trimers 9–12 with Different Geometries.

Scheme 2

Open in a new tab

Reaction conditions: (i) (a) 2,4-dimethylpyrrole, TFA, CH2Cl2; (b) DDQ; (c) BF3·Et2O/Et3N.

The obtained new, all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers (9–12) display their main absorption band in the same spectral region [centered at 505–510 nm (Figure S6)], resembling the absorption of each independent BODIPY subunit. Just a weak long-wavelength shoulder is recorded from trimer 12, featuring both 2–8′ and 3–8′ junctions, which can be attributed to a small degree of excitonic coupling in such a geometry (Figure 2).15 Theoretically optimized geometries (CAM-B3LYP) reveal that the steric hindrance around both BODIPY–BODIPY linkage positions imposes an orthogonal disposition of the involved BODIPY subunits [torsion angles approaching 90° (Figure S7)], which hampers any resonant interaction between them. However, the molar absorption markedly depends on the linked chromophoric positions (see Table S1). Thus, trimer 10, featuring solely 2–8′ linkages, displays huge molar absorption (reaching 230000 M–1 cm–1), in concordance with the expected additive contribution of the three involved BODIPY subunits. However, the mixing of the linkage positions (3–8′ and 2–8′ in 9 and 12) implies a decrease in the absorption probability, reaching the lowest values for trimer 11 with just 3–8′ connectivities (down to 90000 M–1 cm–1). For the sake of simplicity, we theoretically simulated the absorption properties of the corresponding dimers 1b and 6b (Table S2), which show the photophysical trends observed in trimers (Tables S1 and S3). The photoexcitation of 2–8′-linked dimer 1b implies the population of two excited states, each resulting from electron promotion in individual BODIPY subunits. Indeed, the molecular orbitals (MOs) involved in the electronic transitions to S1 and S2 are predominantly located in each BODIPY core, leading to additive allowed local excitations (LE) [HOMO–1 → LUMO and HOMO → LUMO (Figure S8)]. However, in 3–8′-linked dimer 6b, the low-lying excited state has partial charge transfer (CT) character. Indeed, and in spite of the orthogonal arrangement, the occupied frontier MOs of both dimers are spread over the two BODIPY cores, whereas the unoccupied ones are exclusively located in one of the BODIPY cores (Figure S8). Therefore, the HOMO → LUMO transition in 6b entails electronic transfer from one BODIPY subunit to another.10c Note that such a weaker CT transition was fully forbidden in 1b, but allowed in 6b, and it is predicted to be at a position similar to that of the LE transitions of 1b (Table S2), in agreement with the experimental findings.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Fluorescence and singlet oxygen efficiency of all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers involving 2–8′ (10), 2–8′ and 3–8′ (9 and 12), and 3–8′ (11) BODIPY–BODIPY linkages in different solvents. Full photophysical data are listed in Table S1.

The fluorescence signatures also differ markedly depending on the geometry of the trimer. Thus, 2–8′-linked trimer 10 shows a single emission centered around 530–535 nm (Figure S6); its intensity decreases with solvent polarity [from 23% to almost 0% (Figure 2)]. As expected, the excited state dynamics are ruled by the orthogonal arrangement-induced intramolecular CT attributed to a symmetry-breaking mechanism (SBCT).16 In agreement with the absorption measurements, the presence of the 3–8′ linkage in the trimer implies a further stabilization of the CT, as reflected in lower fluorescence efficiencies [e.g., <2% in 11, even in apolar media (Figure 2)]. Indeed, in trimers involving the 3–8′ junction (9, 11, and 12), the emission from the LE state is so weak that the ICT emission is detected at longer wavelengths in apolar and low-polarity solvents [shifted up to ∼610 nm in 12 and ∼675 nm in 11 (Figure S6)]. In more polar media, the charge separation (CS) is so stabilized that the ICT becomes a dark state and its emission vanishes, resulting in a single strongly quenched LE emission. The role of the geometry and the solvent is also reflected in the corresponding dimers (Table S3). Thus, 2–8′-linked dimer 1b is more fluorescent than related trimer 10 based on it. The presence of two orthogonally linked BODIPY pairs in this trimer enhances the SBCT probability with the ensuing fluorescence quenching. However, the fluorescence response of 3–8′-linked dimer 6b is weak and similar to that of its counterpart trimer 11, supporting the stronger CS stabilization in this geometry arrangement.

CT states can mediate the triplet state population, promoting singlet oxygen generation by energy transfer (type II mechanism of ROS photogeneration),10c,17 as supported by the detection of the 1O2 phosphorescence at 1270 nm (see the experimental details in the Supporting Information). The most accepted mechanism, enabling the triplet state to be reached from the populated CT one, is spin–orbit charge transfer intersystem crossing (SOCT-ISC).18 All of the studied trimers show an efficient singlet oxygen photogeneration, which decays in polar media (Figure 2). This fact can be explained by the stabilization of a CS state, hindering the required charge recombination (CR) to reach the triplet manifold.16 Accordingly, these trimers show phosphorescence emission placed at 680–770 nm with a lifetime of ≤100 μs (Figure S9) measured from aerated solutions at room temperature. The effect of the trimer geometry on its behavior as a ROS photosensitizer can be rationalized in a similar way. Once again, the highest singlet oxygen efficiencies are achieved for 2–8′-linked trimer 10, whereas the 3–8′ connection decreases the level of singlet oxygen photogeneration (see trimer 11 in Figure 2). The enhancement of the CS when it involves position 3 in the BODIPY–BODIPY linkage enables nonradiative relaxation channels from the ICT state, decreasing both fluorescence and ISC pathways. Further evidence is gathered upon inspection of the ROS generation capability of the corresponding dimers. These dimers show sizable efficiency (Table S3), though 2–8′-linked 1b enables 1O2 generation even in polar media, while the rest of the dimers and the trimer show low efficiency (Figure 3). As mentioned above, the trimers are more prone to undergoing SBCT, the level of ROS generation being therefore high but more sensitive to the solvent polarity and the molecular geometry. Therefore, all of the developed trimers should be able to kill cells by PDT, but only the dual photonic behavior of trimer 10 and, to a lesser extent, 12 should allow phototheragnostic capability (Figure 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Cell viability of SK-Mel-103 cancer cells treated with trimers 9–12 (different concentrations) for 24 h in the absence (black) and presence (gray) of visible light (475 nm, 36 W) for 0.5 h. Values are expressed as means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, and statistical significance was assessed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test. **p < 0.010 and ****p < 0.0001 indicate statistically significant changes.

Accordingly, we evaluated the PDT activity of 9–12. For this purpose, human melanoma cell line SK-Mel-103 and the cell viability WST-1 assay were selected. The cells were treated with increasing doses of the corresponding BODIPY trimer for 24 h and subsequently irradiated with LED light (475 nm, 36 W) for 0.5 h. As shown in Figure 3, all of the studied trimers display evident phototoxicity in a concentration-dependent manner [half-maximal inhibitory concentrations, IC50, between 0.69 and 2.80 μM (see Figure S10 and Table S4)]. By contrast, in the absence of light, no significant adverse effect on cells was detected. These results support trimers 9–12 being platforms for the development of PDT agents.

The significant fluorescent behavior of 10 and 12, in conjunction with their PDT activity (Figures 2 and 3), prompted us to conduct further investigations to support their potential as phototheragnostic agents. Thus, we investigated the capability of these dyes to act as fluorescent intracellular makers. To our satisfaction, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CSLM) demonstrated that both dyes are internalized well into living SK-Mel-103 cells, preferably accumulating in the lysosomes without triggering cell death under the used microscopy conditions [e.g., Pearson’s correlation coefficient Rr of 0.70 ± 0.06 for 12 using LysoTracker Deep Red (see Figure 4 and Table S5)]. In contrast, when using the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum trackers, the two channels do not completely overlap with Pearson’s correlation coefficients decreasing (see Table S5 and Figures S11 and S12). All of these results demonstrate the capability of 10 and 12 to act as fluorescent intracellular probes, supporting their potential to serve as phototheragnostic agents. Moreover, apoptosis was confirmed as the main cell-death mechanism upon light irradiation (PDT treatment) when both dyes are individually used as PDT agents. Thus, flow cytometry shows an increase in the number of Annexin-V positive cells (a hallmark of apoptosis) after the selected PDT treatment (SK-Mel-103 cells; incubation with the dye for 24 h; 475 nm, 36 W, 0.5 h) with an increase in the concentration of the dye. For example, trimer 12 triggers cell death through apoptosis only after irradiation.19 The average percentage of early and late apoptotic cell population increased from 30.5% to 90.1% when the the dye concentration was increased from 2.84 μM [IC50 (see Figure 4)] to 5.00 μM. In contrast, the percentage of necrotic cells was not significant in either case, thus confirming apoptotic cell death (see Figure S13). A similar result was obtained when using 10 instead of 12 (see Figure S14). All of these studies and results support the potential of all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers 10 and 12 to serve as platforms for the development of advanced phototheragnostic agents.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Confocal fluorescence images of subcellular co-localization studies of trimer 10 (2.5 μM) and trimer 12 (5.0 μM) in SK-Mel-103 cells stained with LysoTracker Deep Red. Areas of co-localization appear in yellow/orange in the Merge panels. Pearson’s co-localization coefficient (Rr), provided in the column of two-dimensional intensity, represents a correlation between pixel intensities between trimers and tracker channel in the close-up image. The scale bar is 10 μm.

In summary, a new synthetic strategy based of the regioselective formation of formylBODIPY-based dimers allows easy access to all-orthogonal BODIPY trimers with well-defined final geometries. Photophysical studies demonstrate that the involvement of 2–8′ BODIPY–BODIPY linkages in these trimers is advantageous for counterbalancing singlet oxygen generation and fluorescence toward phototheragnostic purposes. However, further CT state stabilization induced by the presence of 3–8′ linkages is detrimental for both key properties, sustaining the fundamental role of the fine control of the CT to develop smart phototheragnostic agents. Biological studies using SK-Mel-103 cells corroborate trimer photophysics, showing that all of the developed trimers display significant photocytoxicity, which is complemented by bioimaging capability (probing lysosomes) in the case of 10 and 12 involving 2–8′ linkages. These results support the utility of the developed synthetic strategy and the revealed privileged designs (based on 2–8′ BODIPY–BODIPY linkages) for the development of advanced heavy-atom-free PDT agents, including valuable phototheragnostic agents.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Spanish MICINN (PID2020-11455GB-C31, -C32, and -C33 and RTI2018-100910-B-C41), Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (IFI19/00026), Gobierno Vasco (IT1639-22), and Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO 2018/024) for financial support. A.P.-C. thanks Comunidad de Madrid for a research contract. C.D.-N. thanks MICINN for a FPI contract. B.E.-N. thanks the IFI19/00026 project, which is co-funded by the European Union, for a research contract.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01169.

  • General methods, synthetic procedures, characterization data, including copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra, and additional photophysical, computational, and biological results (PDF)

Author Contributions

M.J.O.: conceptualization and coordination of activities. A.P.-C. and F.G.-G.: synthetic development. A.R.A.: structural characterization. J.B. and C.D.-N.: photophysical characterization and computational support. E.R. and I.G.-M.: phosphorescence studies. B.E.-N. and A.G.-F.: biological experiments. R.M.-M., J.B., and M.J.O.: integrating discussion. M.J.O., R.M.-M., J.B., and S.d.l.M.: writing (final review and editing).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ol2c01169_si_001.pdf (6.3MB, pdf)

References

  1. van Straten D.; Mashayekhi V.; de Bruijn H. S.; Oliveira S.; Robinson D. J. Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions. Cancers 2017, 9, 19. 10.3390/cancers9020019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Selected reviews:; a Ferreira dos Santos A.; Queiroz de Almeida D. R.; Ferreira Terra L.; Baptista M. S.; Labriola L. Photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment - an update review. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2019, 5, 25. 10.20517/2394-4722.2018.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Zhao X.; Liu J.; Fan J.; Chao H.; Peng X. Recent progress in photosensitizers for overcoming the challenges of photodynamic therapy: from molecular design to application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4185. 10.1039/D0CS00173B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Kelkar S. S.; Reineke T. M. Theranostics: combining imaging and therapy. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011, 22, 1879. 10.1021/bc200151q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hambling M. R., Huang Y., Eds. Imaging in Photodynamic Therapy; Cellular and Clinical Imaging Series; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. For example, see:Lee M. H.; Sharma A.; Chang M. J.; Lee J.; Son S.; Sessler J. L.; Kang C.; Kim J. S. Fluorogenic reaction-based prodrug conjugates as targeted cancer theranostics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 28. 10.1039/C7CS00557A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang J.; Ning L.; Huang J.; Zhang C.; Pu K. Activatable molecular agents for cancer theranostics. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 618. 10.1039/C9SC05460J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boens N.; Verbelen B.; Ortiz M. J.; Jiao L.; Dehaen W. Synthesis of BODIPY dyes through postfunctionalization of the boron dipyrromethene core. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 399, 213024.and references cited therein 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang J.; Gong Q.; Wang L.; Hao E.; Jiao L. The Main Strategies for Tuning BODIPY Fluorophores into Photosensitizers. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2020, 24, 603.and references cited therein 10.1142/S1088424619300234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Filatov M. A. Heavy-atom-free BODIPY photosensitizers with intersystem crossing mediated by intramolecular photoinduced electron transfer. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 10.and references cited therein 10.1039/C9OB02170A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Lv F.; Yu Y.; Hao E.; Yu C.; Wang H.; Boens N.; Jiao L. Highly Regioselective α-Formylation and α-Acylation of BODIPY Dyes via Tandem Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling with in situ Deprotection. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 5121. 10.1039/C9OB00927B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ramos-Torres Á.; Avellanal-Zaballa E.; Prieto-Castañeda A.; García-Garrido F.; Bañuelos J.; Agarrabeitia A. R.; Ortiz M. J. FormylBODIPYs by PCC-Promoted Selective Oxidation of α-MethylBODIPYs. Synthetic Versatility and Applications. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4563. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. a Kolemen S.; Cakmak Y.; Kostereli Z.; Akkaya E. U. Atropisomeric Dyes: Axial Chirality in Orthogonal BODIPY Oligomers. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 660. 10.1021/ol403193f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ozdemir T.; Bila J. L.; Sozmen F.; Yildirim L. T.; Akkaya E. U. Orthogonal Bodipy Trimers as Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Action. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4821. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Teng K.-X.; Chen W.-K.; Niu L.-Y.; Fang W.-H.; Cui G.; Yang Q.-Z. BODIPY-Based Photodynamic Agents for Exclusively Generating Superoxide Radical over Singlet Oxygen. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 19912. 10.1002/anie.202106748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu C.; Jiao L.; Yin H.; Zhou J.; Pang W.; Wu Y.; Wang Z.; Yang G.; Hao E. α-/β-Formylated Boron–Dipyrrin (BODIPY) Dyes: Regioselective Syntheses and Photophysical Properties. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2011, 5460. 10.1002/ejoc.201100736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu W.; Cui X.; Zhao J. Hetero Bodipy-dimers as heavy atom-free triplet photosensitizers showing a long-lived triplet excited state for triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9009. 10.1039/c3cc45470c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Epelde-Elezcano N.; Palao E.; Manzano H.; Prieto-Castañeda A.; Agarrabeitia A. R.; Tabero A.; Villanueva A.; de la Moya S.; López-Arbeloa I.; Martínez-Martínez V.; Ortiz M. J. Rational Design of Advanced Photosensitizers Based on Orthogonal BODIPY Dimers to Finely Modulate Singlet Oxygen Generation. Chem. - Eur. J. 2017, 23, 4837. 10.1002/chem.201605822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mulay S. V.; Yudhistira T.; Choi M.; Kim Y.; Kim J.; Jang Y. J.; Jon S.; Churchill D. G. Substituent Effects in BODIPY in Live Cell Imaging. Chem. - Asian J. 2016, 11, 3598. 10.1002/asia.201601400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kang Z.; Lv F.; Wu Q.; Li H.; Li Z.; Wu F.; Wang Z.; Jiao L.; Hao E. Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Strategy for Direct and Regioselective Oligomerization of BODIPY Dyes. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 7986. 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu Y.; Zhao J.; Iagatti A.; Bussotti L.; Foggi P.; Castellucci E.; Di Donato M.; Han K.-L. A Revisit to the Orthogonal Bodipy Dimers: Experimental Evidence for the Symmetry Breaking Charge Transfer-Induced Intersystem Crossing J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 122, 2502. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bassan E.; Gualandi A.; Cozzi P. G.; Ceroni P. Design of BODIPY dyes as triplet photosensitizers: electronic properties tailored for solar energy conversion, photoredox catalysis and photodynamic therapy. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 6607. 10.1039/D1SC00732G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kandrashkin Y. E.; Wang Z.; Sukhanov A. A.; Hou Y.; Zhang X.; Liu Y.; Voronkova V. K.; Zhao J. Balance between Triplet States in Photoexcited Orthogonal BODIPY Dimers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 4157. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Qiao L.; Liu J.; Han Y.; Wei F.; Liao X.; Zhang C.; Xie L.; Ji L.; Chao H. Rational design of a lysosome-targeting and near-infrared absorbing Ru(II)–BODIPY conjugate for photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 1790. 10.1039/D0CC06926D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol2c01169_si_001.pdf (6.3MB, pdf)

Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES