Skip to main content
Cambridge Open Access logoLink to Cambridge Open Access
. 2016 Jul 25;144(15):3237–3243. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816001394

Isolation of Bartonella henselae, Bartonella koehlerae subsp. koehlerae, Bartonella koehlerae subsp. bothieri and a new subspecies of B. koehlerae from free-ranging lions (Panthera leo) from South Africa, cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) from Namibia and captive cheetahs from California

S MOLIA 1,2, R W KASTEN 1, M J STUCKEY 1, H J BOULOUIS 3, J ALLEN 4, G M BORGO 5, J E KOEHLER 5, C C CHANG 6, B B CHOMEL 1,*
PMCID: PMC9150282  PMID: 27453220

SUMMARY

Bartonellae are blood- and vector-borne Gram-negative bacteria, recognized as emerging pathogens. Whole-blood samples were collected from 58 free-ranging lions (Panthera leo) in South Africa and 17 cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) from Namibia. Blood samples were also collected from 11 cheetahs (more than once for some of them) at the San Diego Wildlife Safari Park. Bacteria were isolated from the blood of three (5%) lions, one (6%) Namibian cheetah and eight (73%) cheetahs from California. The lion Bartonella isolates were identified as B. henselae (two isolates) and B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae. The Namibian cheetah strain was close but distinct from isolates from North American wild felids and clustered between B. henselae and B. koehlerae. It should be considered as a new subspecies of B. koehlerae. All the Californian semi-captive cheetah isolates were different from B. henselae or B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae and from the Namibian cheetah isolate. They were also distinct from the strains isolated from Californian mountain lions (Felis concolor) and clustered with strains of B. koehlerae subsp. bothieri isolated from free-ranging bobcats (Lynx rufus) in California. Therefore, it is likely that these captive cheetahs became infected by an indigenous strain for which bobcats are the natural reservoir.

Key words: Acynonyx jubatus, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella koehlerae, cheetah, lion, Panthera leo

INTRODUCTION

Members of the genus Bartonella are aerobic Gram-negative bacteria which are mainly vector-borne and recognized as emerging pathogens [1]. Many new species or subspecies have been described in recent years and the genus currently consists of at least 30 species, 16 of which are associated with human diseases [2]. The clinical spectrum of symptoms in humans caused by Bartonella species is considered to be widening [1]. The most common infection is cat scratch disease, caused by B. henselae, with domestic cats (Felis catus) being the natural reservoir [35]. Domestic cats are also the natural reservoir for B. clarridgeiae and B. koehlerae [68].

Free-ranging wild felids, just like domestic cats, can be infected with Bartonella species [911]. In North America, free-ranging mountain lions and bobcats are infected with Bartonella species similar to but different from B. henselae and B. koehlerae, proposed as B. koehlerae subsp. boulouisii and B. koehlerae subsp. bothieri [11, 12], and also infected with B. henselae [12, 13]. In Africa, B. henselae was isolated from free-ranging lions (Panthera leo) from Kruger Park, South Africa [10]. It was also isolated from semi-captive lions from three ranches in the Free State Province, South Africa [14] and Kelly et al. [15] had reported the isolation of B. henselae from a pet cheetah in Zimbabwe. A ftsZ gene sequence close (99%) to B. koehlerae has also been detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a captive margay cat (Leopardus wiedii) born in the wild and kept at Sao Paulo Zoo [16].

As we have recently described new subspecies of B. koehlerae in wild felids from North America [12], the objective of this study aimed to fully describe the Bartonella species previously isolated from free-ranging cheetahs from Namibia and lions from Kruger Park, South Africa [10] in order to determine if they belonged to a new Bartonella species or subspecies, as well as Bartonella isolated from captive cheetahs at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park, CA, USA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains

B. henselae type I (Houston 1) ATCC 49882 and B. clarridgeiae ATCC 51734 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Strain U4 originally isolated from a naturally infected cat at the University of California Davis was used for the B. henselae type II (Marseille type). B. koehlerae strain C29 (ATCC 700693) was isolated from a naturally infected barn cat [7]. Candidatus B. weissii (now B. bovis), isolated from domestic cats and the B. henselae Zimbabwean cheetah strain were kindly provided by Russell L. Regnery (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA).

Clinical samples

Animals. Whole blood samples (1·5–2·0 ml per tube) were collected in EDTA plastic tubes (Becton Dickinson and Company, USA) from 58 free-ranging lions at Kruger Park, South Africa and 17 cheetahs held in a rehabilitation centre after being rescued from various regions of Namibia, as previously reported [10]. At the San Diego Zoo Safari Park, blood samples were collected from 11 cheetahs in 1999 (Table 1), of which four had blood collected more than once. These animals were kept in a large open enclosure during the day. Collection of blood samples by veterinarians was performed under animal use and care protocols of the San Diego Zoo Safari Park and at the Cheetah Conservation Fund facility. Animals were tranquillized using 11 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride via the intramuscular route. All blood samples were stored at −20 °C or lower until they were processed for culture.

Table 1.

Bartonella bacteraemia level, serological titres, sex, age and date of collection of blood samples from 11 semi-captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), San Diego Zoo Safari Park, California

ID Sex Age, yr Date collected c.f.u./ml IFA (B.h.)
MO692327 Male 6 21 Jan. 1999 22 0
MO692326 Male 6 27 Jan. 1999 35 128
MO692328 Male 6 15 Jan. 1999 5 0
MO691036 Female 8 26 Feb. 1999 355 0
24 June 1999 20 0
MO689192 Female 10 21 Jan. 1999 250 32
25 May 1999 1322 64
MO692324 Female 7 9 June 1999 0 0
5 July 1999 0 0
MO695628 Female 4 14 June 1999 373 64
18 Oct. 1999 168 64
MO692586 Male 6 22 June 1999 0 128
MO691033 Male 8 10 Aug. 1999 0 0
MO691023 Male 8 27 Aug. 1999 10 ±32
MO689255 Male 10 14 Sept. 1999 1043 0

B.h., Bartonella henselae; c.f.u./ml, colony-forming units/millilitre; IFA, immunofluorescence assay.

Blood culture

In 2003, the whole-blood samples were defrosted and then centrifuged at 5000 g for 30 min at room temperature. Blood pellets were resuspended in 125 µl M199 inoculation medium [17] and plated onto heart infusion agar (Difco Laboratories, USA) containing 5% fresh rabbit blood. The plates were then incubated at 35°C in 5% CO2 for 4 weeks, and cultures were examined at least twice a week for bacterial growth. The number of colonies observed was recorded as the number of colony-forming units per milliliter (c.f.u./ml) of blood. Colonies were subcultured, harvested, and frozen at −70 °C.

Microscopic analysis

Gram staining was performed on all isolates. Sterile swabs moistened with filter-sterilized phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were used to remove colonies from subcultured agar plates to glass slides. Following heat fixation, Gram staining was used for light microscopic visualization of organisms. The motility of cells suspended in heart infusion broth was determined with a 100 × oil immersion objective.

Indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) test

Antibody titres against B. henselae were determined using an IFA test [10]. For antigen preparation, B. henselae (strain U4) was cultivated on Vero cells for 3–5 days. Infected Vero cells were then suspended in L15/MEM tissue culture medium (Invitrogen, USA). Infected Vero cells were applied to each well of multi-well super-cured heavy Teflon-coated slides (Erie Scientific Co., USA) and incubated for 24 h to allow the cells to adhere to the slides. Slides were then rinsed in PBS (pH 7·4), air-dried, acetone-fixed, and stored at −20 °C after a final air-drying. Wild cat sera (supernatant from the whole-blood samples) were diluted 1:64 in PBS with 5% skim milk, and added to the test wells of the slides. After washing in PBS, fluorescein-labelled goat anti-cat IgG (Cappel, Organon Teknika Corp., USA) was used as the conjugate. Positive and negative controls were included on each test slide. Intensity of fluorescence of the bacteria was graded subjectively on a scale of 0–4. Fluorescence intensity ⩾2 at a dilution of 1:64 was considered to be a qualitatively positive result, as described previously [9]. For a quantitative result, positive sera were serially diluted (twofold dilutions) to obtain an endpoint titre. Reading of the slides was performed independently by two readers for all serum samples.

DNA extraction and PCR

Subcultured colonies were scraped off and suspended in 100 µl sterile water. The bacterial suspension was heated for 15 min at 100 °C and centrifuged at 15 000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant, diluted 1:10, was then used as a template for amplification of the 16S rRNA, gltA, ribC, groEL and ftsZ genes as well as the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region (ITS). About 380 base pairs (bp) of the gltA gene [18], 1500 bp of the 16S rRNA gene [19], 1500 bp of the groEL gene [20], 700 bp of 16S-23S ITS [21], 764 bp of the ftsZ gene [22], 586 bp of the ribC gene [23] and fragments of various size of 16S-23S ITS [24] were amplified using previously described primers and methods and verified by gel electrophoresis.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)

The amplified products were enzymatically digested overnight using various restriction endonucleases. The amplified product of the gltA gene was digested with TaqI (Promega, USA), HhaI, MseI, and AciI (New England Biolabs, USA), the amplified product of the 16S rRNA gene was digested with DdeI (New England Biolabs), the amplified product of the ribC gene was digested with TaqI, and the amplified product of the 16S-23S ITS gene was digested with TaqI and HaeIII. The temperature of digestion was 65 °C for TaqI and 37 °C for all other enzymes. The digested fragments were separated by electrophoresis in a 3% Nusieve GTG agarose gel (Biowhittaker Molecular Applications, USA). Fragment sizes were estimated by comparison with a 100-bp ladder (Invitrogen).

Sequencing

PCR products used for DNA sequencing were purified with QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen Sciences, USA) and sequencing was done in both directions using a fluorescence-based automated sequencing system (Davis Sequencing, USA). For the phylogenetic analysis, sequence data of the gltA, ftsZ, rpoB [25] genes and the ITS region were imported into Vector NTI Suite 9.0 software (Invitrogen) in order to obtain a consensus sequence. Align X in Vector NTI was utilized for aligning sequence variants with each other and other known species of Bartonella for each of the genes or ITS. A neighbour-joining tree was constructed using MEGA v. 5.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net) by concatenating the four sequences [26]. Bootstrap replicates were performed to estimate node reliability of the phylogenetic tree, with values obtained from 1000 randomly selected samples of the aligned sequence data. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura two-parameter method [27].

RESULTS

Primary isolation

In primary isolation, very small colonies were observed growing on 5% rabbit blood heart infusion agar plates after at least 14 days following plating of the blood pellets from three (5·2%) of the 58 lions, one (5·9%) of the 17 Namibian cheetahs, as previously reported [10] and eight (73%) of the 11 semi-captive cheetahs from California (Table 1). All bacterial colonies were homogeneous, either rough or smooth, round, grey-white in colour, 0·3–1·0 mm in diameter and embedded in the medium. The numbers of c.f.u./ml for the lion's isolates were respectively 35 and 93 c.f.u./ml in two adult females and 2000 c.f.u./ml in a juvenile male, as previously reported [10]. For the adult male cheetah that was culture positive, the number of colonies was 49 c.f.u./ml. For the Californian semi-captive cheetahs, bacteraemia ranged between 5 and 1322 c.f.u./ml (Table 1).

Microscopic examination.

Microscopic examination after Gram staining revealed short, slender Gram-negative rods. No motility or flagella were detected.

Serology

Serological results for the African free-ranging wild felids have been presented previously [10]. For the semi-captive cheetahs from California, five (45·5%) animals were seropositive with titres ranging from 1:64 to 1:128. Two cheetahs had low titres (⩽64) and five culture-positive cheetahs were seronegative.

PCR/RFLP analysis

Two of the three lion isolates had profiles similar to B. henselae for the gltA gene when using TaqI, HhaI and AciI enzymes and the ITS gene using TaqI. The PCR/RFLP profiles after digestion of the gltA gene by TaqI and HhaI endonucleases showed that the Namibian cheetah strain (1178) and the lion strain 98–215 were similar to B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae's profile with only lion strain 98–215 having a profile similar to B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae after digestion with AciI. A unique profile for cheetah strain 1178 and lion strain 98–215 was obtained for the gltA gene using HhaI endonuclease (Fig. 1), and for the ribC gene using TaqI endonuclease (data not shown), different from all other wild cat strains, but similar to B. koehlerae and B. bovis (ex weissii). Using the DdeI enzyme for the 16S rRNA gene, all isolates were determined to have the same profile as B. henselae type II, with the exception of the lion isolate 98-215 which was similar to the profiles of B. henselae type I, B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae and B. bovis (formerly B. weissii).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

PCR/RFLP of the gltA gene using HhaI endonuclease, showing a unique profile for cheetah strain 1178 and lion strain 98–215 compared to all other wild felid isolates (no digestion), similar to B. koehlerae and B. bovis (ex weissii).

Sequencing

As previously reported, B. henselae was isolated from the blood of two of the bacteraemic lions (isolates 150·41 and 7069). Both isolates were identified as B. henselae type II (Marseille) based on partial sequencing of the 16s RNA gene. The third isolate from a juvenile (aged <24 months) male lion (98-215) was determined to be 100% identical to B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae by partial sequencing of three different genes (gltA, ftsZ, rpoB) and the 16S-23S ITS, as shown for the concatenated tree (Fig. 2). The three bacteraemic lions were from different locations in Kruger National Park, South Africa. The Bartonella strain isolated from the blood of the bacteraemic cheetah from Gobabis District, Namibia was a previously unidentified strain temporarily designated as ‘Cheetah 1178’. The California captive cheetahs all had an identical PCR/RFLP profile and partial sequencing revealed that they were identical to B. koehlerae subsp. bothieri (strain L1796), isolated from a California bobcat [12].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree of Bartonella species based on the combined gltA, rpoB, ftsZ, and intergenic transcribed spacer sequence alignment. The tree shown is a neighbour-joining tree based on the Kimura two-parameter model of nucleotide substitution. Bootstrap values are based on 1000 replicates. The analysis provided tree topology only; the lengths of the vertical and horizontal lines are not significant.

DISCUSSION

B. henselae was isolated from two adult lions, as reported previously [10]. Both isolates were identified as type II (Marseille) based on partial sequencing of the 16s RNA gene. An isolate of B. henselae type II was also reported from a lion living in one of three game farms in the Free State, South Africa [14]. The third isolate from a young male lion was determined to be 100% identical to B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae by PCR/RFLP and by partial sequencing of two different genes (gltA ftsZ) and the 16S-23S ITS. This is the first report of isolation of B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae from a free-ranging wild felid and expands the spectrum of felids that can be naturally infected with this Bartonella species. Until that isolate, B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae had only been isolated from domestic cats in the United States, France and Israel [7, 2830] and B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae DNA had been detected from cat and rodent fleas [28, 31], a captive margay cat [16] as well as from three of 61 dogs that were culture- or PCR-positive for Bartonella species after enrichment [32]. It was also identified in two cases (a human and a dog) of endocarditis [29, 33]. This study confirms that besides domestic cats, free-ranging wild felids are infected and could be reservoirs of B. henselae, the agent of cat scratch disease, and B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae, a known human pathogen.

Kelly et al. [15] reported the isolation of B. henselae genotype II from a pet cheetah from Zimbabwe. The present study is the first to report the isolation of a Bartonella species from a wild-caught cheetah. The PCR/RFLP profiles, using various endonucleases, led to a specific profile (no digestion) for cheetah strain 1178 and lion strain 98–215 for the gltA gene using HhaI endonuclease and for the ribC gene using TaqI endonuclease. This was different from all other wild cat strains but similar to B. koehlerae and B. bovis. Furthermore, partial sequencing of gltA, groEL, ftsZ genes and ITS put this Namibian cheetah strain (1178) in an intermediate position between B. henselae and B. koehlerae, as shown for strains isolated from free-ranging mountain lions and bobcats from California [12], but clearly distinct from the cheetah isolates from the San Diego Zoo.

The high infection rate of the semi-captive cheetahs from southern California was unexpected, but could be explained by the frequent contacts between these animals and the sharing of ectoparasites such as fleas. Interestingly, all the cheetah isolates were different from B. henselae or B. koehlerae subsp. koehlerae isolates, and from the Namibian cheetah isolate, clustering with the B. koehlerae subsp. bothieri strains isolated from free-ranging bobcats (Lynx rufus) in California. They also were distinct from the B. koehlerae subsp. boulouisii strain isolates from mountain lions (Felis concolor) from California. Therefore, it is very likely that the semi-captive cheetahs became infected by an indigenous strain for which bobcats are the natural reservoir, possibly through infected fleas carried by bacteraemic bobcats.

The strains isolated from mountain lions, bobcats and cheetahs were morphologically similar to B. henselae and B. koehlerae, but they were not noticeable on blood agar for 2 weeks after plating. By contrast, Bartonella colonies are usually visible within a few days for domestic cat isolates. This characteristic was also observed in specific pathogen-free domestic kittens experimentally infected with one of the mountain lion isolates [8].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Russell L. Regnery for providing the cheetah strain from Zimbabwe. This project has been funded in part by the George and Phyllis Miller Feline Research Fund, Center for Companion Animal Health, U.C. Davis, California, the Master of Preventive Veterinary Medicine Research Project Fund (University of California, Davis) and Mérial Inc., Athens, GA. Sophie Molia was a recipient of a Lavoisier grant (French Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and Barron fellowship (University of California, Davis). Jane E. Koehler received funding support from a California HIV Research Program Award, and NIH grants U54AI065359 and R01AI103299 from the NIAID.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Boulouis HJ, et al. Factors associated with the rapid emergence of zoonotic Bartonella infections. Veterinary Research 2006; 36: 383–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chomel BB, et al. Candidatus Bartonella merieuxii, a potential new zoonotic Bartonella species in canids from Iraq. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2012; 6: e1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Regnery R, Martin M Olson J. Naturally occurring ‘Rochalimaea henselae’ infection indomestic cat. Lancet 1992; 340: 557–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koehler JE, Glaser CA, Tappero JW. Rochalimaea henselae infection. A new zoonosis with the domestic cat as reservoir. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 271: 531–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abbott RC, et al. Experimental and natural infection with Bartonella henselae indomestic cats. Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1997; 20: 41–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kordick DL, et al. Bartonella clarridgeiae, a newly recognized zoonotic pathogen causinginoculation papules, fever, and lymphadenopathy (cat scratch disease). Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1997; 35: 1813–1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Droz S, et al. Bartonella koehlerae sp. nov., isolated from cats. Journal of ClinicalMicrobiology 1999; 37: 1117–1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamamoto K, et al. Homologous protection but lack of heterologous-protection by various species and types of Bartonella in specific pathogen-free cats. Veterinary Immunology Immunopathology 1998; 65: 191–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chomel BB, et al. Seroprevalence of Bartonella infection in American free-ranging and captive pumas (Puma concolor) and bobcats (Lynx rufus). Veterinary Research 2004; 35: 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Molia S, et al. Prevalence of Bartonella infection in wild African lions (Panthera leo) and cheetahs (Acinonyx jubata). Veterinary Microbiology 2004; 100: 31–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chomel BB, et al. Bartonella infection in domestic cats and wild felids. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2006; 1078: 410–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chomel BB, et al. Isolation of Bartonella henselae and two new Bartonella subspecies, Bartonella koehlerae subspecies boulouisii subsp. nov. and Bartonella koehlerae subspecies bothieri subsp. nov. from free-ranging Californian mountain lions and bobcats. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0148299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Girard YA, et al. Zoonotic vector-borne bacterial pathogens in California mountain lions (Puma concolor), 1987–2010. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 2012; 12: 913–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pretorius AM, et al. Bartonella henselae in African lion, South Africa. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10: 2257–2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kelly PJ, et al. Bartonella henselae isolated from cats in Zimbabwe. Lancet 1998; 351: 1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Filoni C, et al. Surveillance using serological and molecular methods for the detection ofinfectious agents in captive Brazilian neotropic and exotic felids. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic and Investigation 2012; 24: 166–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koehler JE, et al. Isolation of Rochalimaea species from cutaneous and osseous lesions of bacillary angiomatosis. New England Journal of Medicine 1992; 327: 1625–1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Norman AF, et al. Differentiation of Bartonella-like isolates at the species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in the citrate synthase gene. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995; 33: 1797–1803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gurfield AN, et al. Epidemiology of Bartonella infection in domestic cats in France. Veterinary Microbiology 2001; 80: 185–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Marston EL, Sumner JW, Regnery RL. Evaluation of intraspecies genetic variationwithin the 60 kDa heat-shock protein gene (groEL) of Bartonella species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1999; 49: 1015–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roux V, Raoult D. Inter- and intraspecies identification of Bartonella (Rochalimaea) species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995; 33: 1573–1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zeaiter Z, Liang Z, Raoult D. Genetic classification and differentiation of Bartonellaspecies based on comparison of partial ftsZ gene sequences. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 3641–3647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Johnson G, et al. Detection and identification of Bartonella species pathogenic for humans by PCR amplification targeting the riboflavin synthase gene (ribC). Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 1069–1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jensen WA, et al. Rapid identification and differentiation of Bartonella species using a single-step PCR assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000; 38: 1717–1722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Renesto P, et al. Use of rpoB gene analysis for detection and identification of Bartonella species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 430–437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tamura K, et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2011; 28: 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 1980; 16: 111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rolain JM, et al. Molecular detection of Bartonella quintana, B. koehlerae, B. henselae, B. clarridgeiae, Rickettsia felis, and Wolbachia pipientis in cat fleas, France. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2003; 9: 338–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Avidor B, et al. Bartonella koehlerae, a new cat-associated agent of culture-negativehuman endocarditis. Journal of Clinical Microbioogy 2004; 42: 3462–3468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gutiérrez R, Nachum-Biala Y, Harrus S. Relationship between the presence ofBartonella species and bacterial loads in cats and cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) under natural conditions. Applied Environmental Microbiology 2015; 81: 5613–5621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marié JL, et al. Molecular detection of Bartonella quintana, B. elizabethae, B. koehlerae, B. doshiae, B. taylorii, and Rickettsia felis in rodent fleas collected in Kabul, Afghanistan. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2006; 74: 436–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pérez C, et al. Molecular and serological diagnosis of Bartonella infection in 61 dogsfrom the United States. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2011; 25: 805–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ohad DG, et al. Molecular detection of Bartonella henselae and Bartonella koehlerae from aortic valves of Boxer dogs with infective endocarditis. Veterinary Microbiology 2010; 141: 182–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES