Abstract
In the US, as many as 20% of recruits sustain stress fractures during basic training. In addition, approximately one-third of female recruits develop iron deficiency upon completion of training. Iron is a cofactor in bone collagen formation and vitamin D activation, thus we hypothesized iron deficiency may be contributing to altered bone microarchitecture and mechanics during 12-weeks of increased mechanical loading. Three-week old female Sprague Dawley rats were assigned to one of four groups: iron adequate sedentary, iron deficient sedentary, iron adequate exercise, and iron deficient exercise. Exercise consisted of high-intensity treadmill running (54 min 3×/week). After 12-weeks, serum bone turnover markers, femoral geometry and microarchitecture, mechanical properties and fracture toughness, and tibiae mineral composition and morphometry were measured. Iron deficiency increased the bone resorption markers C-terminal telopeptide type I collagen and tartate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b). In exercised rats, iron deficiency further increased bone TRAcP 5b, while in iron adequate rats, exercise increased the bone formation marker procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide. In the femur, exercise increased cortical thickness and maximum load. In the tibia, iron deficiency increased the rate of bone formation, mineral apposition, and zinc content. These data show that the femur and tibia structure and mechanical properties are not negatively impacted by iron deficiency despite a decrease in tibiae iron content and increase in serum bone resorption markers during 12-weeks of high-intensity running in young growing female rats.
Keywords: nutrition, iron, exercise, rodent, microarchitecture, mechanical testing, dynamic histomorphometry
INTRODUCTION
In the US Military, lower extremity stress fractures remain a burden to health care and financial resources(1). Recruits completing basic military training (BMT) have up to an 18-fold higher risk for developing stress fractures compared to active duty personnel(2). Risk factors involved in the etiology of stress fractures includes sex, race, and age (non-modifiable), and nutrition status, fitness level, and body mass (modifiable)(2). Examining how modifiable risk factors impact bone health and contribute to stress fractures is important for developing prevention strategies during BMT.
Iron is required for bone growth during maturation and maintenance in adulthood(3). It serves as a cofactor for prolyl- and lysyl- hydroxylases, two enzymes critical for collagen formation. Collagen synthesis begins with the formation of procollagen, a three-dimensional structure comprised of glycine and proline. Hydroxylation occurs when ferrous iron is oxidized in the presence of molecular oxygen, α-ketoglutarate, and ascorbic acid(4). This new structure undergoes glycosylation and forms collagen, the main constituent of bone. Iron is also a structural component of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1-α-hydroxylase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of calcidiol to the bioactive calcitriol(5). Calcitriol maintains calcium levels mainly by enhancing intestinal absorption, and also by kidney reabsorption and bone resorption(6).
Iron status falls along a continuum from optimum to iron deficiency anemia. Iron deficiency represents the stage between optimum and iron deficiency anemia. Iron deficiency is characterized by the depletion of stored iron and increase in transport proteins, while iron deficiency anemia is considered a decrease in the concentrations of hemoglobin and hematocrit(7). The prevalence of iron deficiency in women increases by ~20% during BMT(8, 9). While the cause remains unknown(10), it may be due to lower iron consumption during training, decreasing 22%(11). Due to the role of iron in collagen formation and vitamin D metabolism, iron deficiency may be contributing to changes in microarchitecture and mechanics, leading to stress fractures during periods of increased loading. This has not been studied. Iron deficiency may be contributing to the increased number of stress fractures during BMT, however, this has not been studied.
The objective of this investigation was to measure the impact of iron deficiency on cortical and trabecular bone of the femur and tibia in sedentary and exercised female rats. To accomplish this, 3-week old female Sprague Dawley rats were fed iron deficient or control diets, and completed 12-weeks of involuntary treadmill running, or remained sedentary. Female rats become sexually mature ~ six weeks of age and reach peak bone mass within three months(12). This age span includes adolescence and early adulthood, similar to female recruits, i.e. the mean age is 20–22 years old(11, 13). Running exercise was chosen because it comprises a significant portion of physical activity during BMT. Our hypothesis was that iron deficiency would impair bone development and strength.
METHODS
Animals.
This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Uniformed Services University (USU) under protocol MEM-17–020. Animals were maintained in accordance with the Guide for Animal Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as prepared by the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources.
Forty-two 3-week old (51–75 g) female Sprague Dawley rats (strain code 400) were purchased from Charles River (Wilmington, MA). Rats were pair-housed in a temperature and humidity controlled room within the USU Department of Laboratory and Animal Resources facility on a reverse 12 h light and 12 h dark schedule, and allowed free access to food and water. After 72 h of acclimation to the facility, animals began treadmill habituation and remained on standard chow. Body mass, feed, and water consumption were measured weekly throughout the study. At the end of the experiment, rats were euthanized by carbon dioxide exposure. Blood was collected via cardiac puncture, and plasma or serum was isolated by centrifugation (3,800g for 15 minutes at 4°C) and stored at −80°C until analysis. Right and left femurs and tibias were dissected and prepared/stored as described below.
Treadmill habituation.
All animals were habituated to running on a three lane rodent motorized treadmill (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH) and V̇O2 peak testing procedures on a single lane modular enclosed metabolic treadmill (Oxymax, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). Animals performed a total of six habituation sessions on non-consecutive days over the course of 2 weeks. During habituation, animals ran at speeds of 10–25 m/min for a total of 10 min at a 10° incline. A mild electrical shock (0.34 mA) was used for negative reinforcement during all treadmill sessions, and one chocolate chip was provided to each animal after all treadmill sessions as a means of positive reinforcement. After habituation, animals were divided into exercise or sedentary groups.
Diet.
After treadmill habituation, half of the exercise and sedentary animals were randomly assigned to either an iron deficient or iron adequate control diet. The experimental diets were based on a modified AIN-93G and contained either no iron (Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, Product ID D03072501) or 0.212 g Ferric Citrate /kg (Product ID D03072502). In total, there were four experimental groups: iron adequate sedentary (IAS, n = 10), iron adequate exercise (IAE, n = 11), iron deficient sedentary (IDS, n = 10), or iron deficient exercise (IDE, n = 10).
V̇O2 peak testing and exercise training.
The Oxymax system was calibrated to manufacturer specifications before each V̇O2 peak test. For the V̇O2 peak test, animals completed a 10 min warm-up with the velocity increased from 15 to 25 m/min at an incline of 10°. After warm up the velocity was increased by 2.0 m/min every 2 min until V̇O2 leveled-off or animals refused to run, defined as shock lasting longer than 5 sec. A V̇O2 peak test was performed every two weeks to adjust running speed. Animals achieving a velocity within 2 m/min during V̇O2 peak testing were grouped together for training. Each session consisted of an 18 min warm-up at 50% V̇O2 peak, six alternating intervals consisting of 4 min at 85–90% V̇O2 peak, and 2 min at 50% V̇O2 peak. A 10° incline was maintained throughout all training sessions. Animals completed three training sessions per week on non-consecutive days for 12 weeks. BMT includes both physical training as well as military training exercises.
Iron status and bone biomarkers.
Iron status was determined in whole blood using an automated complete blood count (VRL Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). ELISA kits were used to measure serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b, SB-TR102), c-terminal telopeptides type I collagen (CTx, AC-06F1), osteocalcin (OC, AC-12F1), and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP, AC-33F1) (Immunodiagnostic Systems, Gaithersburg, MD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH, 50-155-358) (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH). The coefficient of variation was < 10% for all assays.
Bone mineral analysis.
Tibiae were harvested, cleaned of tissue, wrapped in phosphate-buffered saline-soaked gauze, placed in 5 ml conical scintillation vials, and stored at −80°C prior to shipping to the University of Delaware (Newark, DE). Tibiae were thawed to room temperature, dried at 60°C degree for 24 h, weighed and digested in trace metal grade nitric acid. Mineral composition (iron, calcium, zinc and phosphorous) was measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry(14).
Dynamic histomorphometry.
Calcein injections (25 mg/kg) were administered subcutaneously 9 and 2 days prior to euthanasia to permit measurement of bone remodeling rates. Tibiae were harvested, cleaned of tissue, and placed in 10% formalin for 48 h before changing to 70% ethanol. Bones were kept at 4°C and shipped to the Indiana University School of Medicine (Indianapolis, IN). Tibiae were subjected to serial dehydration and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Sections (4 μm) were cut using a microtome, fixed to slides, and cover-slipped unstained. Trabecular bone surfaces were measured for single, double, and no label; regions with double label were further analyzed to determine the distance between labels. The mineral apposition rate (9), mineralizing surface/bone surface (MS/BS), and bone formation rate (BFR) were calculated. All measures, calculations, and terminology were adopted from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research(15).
Micro-Computed Tomography.
Femurs were harvested, cleaned of tissue, wrapped in phosphate-buffered saline-soaked gauze, placed in 5ml conical scintillation vials, and stored at 4°C prior to shipping to the Indiana University School of Medicine (Indianapolis, IN). Cortical and trabecular bone scans and analyses were conducted according to standardized procedures(16, 17). In brief, whole femora were scanned using an 18 μm isotropic voxel size on a SkyScan 1176 micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) system (Bruker, Billerica, MA). At the mid-diaphysis (~50% total length), cortical (Ct.) bone area, cortical cross-sectional thickness, and mean polar moment of inertia (MMI-polar) were quantified. At the distal femur metaphysis (1-mm region located ~0.5 mm proximal to the growth plate) trabecular bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and trabecular number (Tb.N) were quantified.
Mechanical testing.
Three-point bending tests were completed with the same femora (left) that were used for micro-CT scans according to standardized procedures (16, 18). In brief, bones were placed posterior side down on bottom fixtures that were 18 mm apart. The upper fixture point was positioned, centered at midpoint of the bone. Bones were displaced at a rate of 2 mm/min until failure. Force and displacement data were collected at 15 Hz. Mechanical parameters were calculated using a custom MATLAB program as previously published(16, 18). Structural parameters included maximum load, yield load, stiffness, total work, and post-yield work. Material-level properties were calculated using beam-bending equations and geometry data from micro-CT analysis to estimate ultimate stress, yield stress, modulus, and toughness.
Fracture toughness.
Fracture toughness of right femurs was measured using a linear elastic fracture mechanics approach(19). Femurs were notched approximately one-quarter of the way through the posterior side of the mid-diaphysis with a low-speed sectioning saw equipped with a diamond wafering blade (width of 0.012”), and then the notch tip was sharpened by hand with a razor blade lubricated with a 1 μm diamond suspension to a final depth not exceeding one-third of the anterior-posterior diameter. Each bone was then loaded to failure in 3-pt bending (support span of 16 mm) at a displacement control rate of 0.001 mm/s with the notched surface in tension. After failure, the distal end of each femur was cleansed of bone marrow with a water pick and dehydrated using an ethanol gradient (70–100%) and a vacuum desiccator. Following sputter-coating with gold, the cross-sectional fracture surface was imaged with a scanning electron microscope. The angles of stable and unstable crack growth were obtained from the images and, along with geometric properties from micro-CT data, a custom MATLAB script calculated stress intensity factors for crack initiation, maximum load, and fracture instability(20).
Statistical analysis.
A power analysis was conducted using G*Power for a factorial ANOVA with 2×2 between-subject factors, power set at 0.8, and alpha at 0.05. In order to detect a large effect size (f = 0.51), 32 total rats (n = 8/group) were needed to complete the study. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Main effects of diet, activity, and the interaction were determined using a 2-factor ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were made using Bonferroni to adjust for multiple comparisons. We accepted a P < 0.05 as being statistically significant. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
RESULTS
Iron Status.
Weekly food intake (Figure 1A) and final body weight did not differ between treatment groups (Figure 1B). Iron deficiency reduced hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, and increased red cell distribution width (Table 1). Exercise further increased red cell distribution width within iron deficient rats.
Figure 1.

A. Weekly food intake. Values are means ± SD per cage, 2 rats per cage, n = 20 per group. B. Weekly body mass response to exercise and iron intake. Values are means ± SD, n = 10–11 per group. IAS, iron-adequate sedentary; IAE, iron-adequate exercise; IDS, iron-deficient sedentary; IDE, iron-deficient exercise.
Table 1.
Hematological response to exercise and iron intake.
| IAS | IAE | IDS | IDE | Diet | Exercise | Diet × Exercise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hgb, g/dL | 18.3 ± 1.3 | 18.0 ± 1.3 | 15.1 ± 1.5 | 14.9 ± 2.3 | <0.001 | - | - |
| Hct, % | 58.1 ± 5.3 | 57.5 ± 5.5 | 49.5 ± 5.8 | 49.5 ± 6.5 | <0.001 | - | - |
| MCH, pg | 18.1 ± 0.9 | 18.6 ± 0.8 | 15.6 ± 1.0 | 14.9 ± 1.3 | <0.001 | - | 0.062 |
| MCHC, g/dL | 31.5 ± 1.2 | 31.7 ± 1.2 | 30.4 ± 1.0 | 30.1 ± 0.7 | <0.001 | - | - |
| RDW, % | 12.1 ± 0.6 | 12.5 ± 0.5 | 13.7 ± 1.0 | 15.4 ± 1.5 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.036 |
Values are means ± SD, n = 10–11. IAS, iron adequate sedentary; IAE, iron adequate exercise; IDS, iron deficient sedentary; IDE, iron deficient exercise; Hgb, hemoglobin; Hct hematocrit; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; RDW, red cell distribution width.
Serum Bone Biomarkers.
Iron deficiency increased the bone resorption markers TRAcP 5b (15%) and CTx (27%) (Figure 2). In exercised rats, iron deficiency further increased TRAcP 5b (25%). In iron adequate rats, exercise increased the bone formation marker PINP by 16%. Also, exercise increased osteocalcin levels by 13%. The concentration of PTH was unaffected by iron deficiency or exercise: (IAS: 139.7 ± 20.3, IAE: 114.6 ± 8.7, IDS: 119.1 ± 14.3, IDE: 139.6 ± 16.0 pg/mL), P > 0.05.
Figure 2.

Serum biomarkers of bone formation and resorption. Values are means ± SD, n = 9–10 per group. A. Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP); B. C-terminal telopeptide type I collagen (CTx-1); C. Osteocalcin; D. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b).
Tibiae Histomorphometry.
Independent of exercise, iron deficient rats had higher MAR (24%) and BFR (30%) (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Dynamic histomorphometry analyses determine at the proximal tibia metaphysis. Values are means ± SD, n = 8–11 per group. A. Mineral Apposition Rate (9); B. Mineralized Surface (MS/BS); C. Bone Formation Rate (BFR).
Femoral Micro-Computed Tomography.
The microarchitecture of femoral trabecular and geometrical properties of cortical bone are shown in Figure 4. Of the trabecular microarchitectural properties (Figures A–D), exercise led to higher BV/TV (22%) and Tb.Th (9%). In cortical bone (Figures E–H), exercise led to higher Ct.Th by 5%.
Figure 4.

Femur cortical geometric properties and cancellous microarchitecture determined by micro-CT. Cortical properties were determined at the mid-diaphysis. Values are means ± SD, n = 9–11 per group. A. Bone volume/total volume (BV/TV); B. Trabecular thickness (Tb.Th); C. Trabecular separation (Tb.Sp); D. Trabecular number (Tb.N); E. Mean total crossectional tissue area (T.Ar); F. Mean total crossectional bone area (B.Ar); G. Mean polar moment of inertia (MMI-polar); H. Cortical thickness (Ct.Th).
Femoral Three-Point Bending.
Structural and material properties of the femur are shown in Table 2. Exercise increased maximum load by 7%.
Table 2.
Biomechanical properties of the femur determined by three-point bending tests.
| IAS | IAE | IDS | IDE | Diet | Exercise | Diet × Exercise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structural properties | |||||||
| Stiffness, N/mm | 284.2 ± 22.5 | 298.6 ± 33.2 | 281.2 ± 42.0 | 275.0 ± 26.3 | - | - | - |
| Yield Load, N | 86.1 ± 7.6 | 85.0 ± 5.3 | 83.2 ± 10.6 | 85.2 ± 6.0 | - | - | - |
| Maximum Load, N | 102.6 ± 7.9 | 114.3 ± 11.4 | 104.7 ± 13.0 | 107.7 ± 8.8 | - | 0.036 | - |
| Total Work, mJ | 37.09 ± 10.83 | 45.73 ± 10.19 | 41.04 ± 11.26 | 42.53 ± 5.49 | - | - | - |
| Post-Yield Work, mJ | 22.91 ± 12.09 | 32.48 ± 10.61 | 27.65 ± 11.03 | 28.23 ± 6.23 | - | - | - |
| Material properties | |||||||
| Modulus, GPa | 0.36 ± 0.09 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | - | - | - |
| Yield Stress, MPa | 24.6 ± 6.0 | 24.1 ± 4.5 | 23.5 ± 6.0 | 22.3 ± 4.1 | - | - | - |
| Ultimate Stress, MPa | 29.2 ± 7.2 | 32.2 ± 5.7 | 29.5 ± 7.0 | 28.3 ± 5.7 | - | - | - |
| Toughness, MPa | 2.34 ± 0.72 | 3.08 ± 0.94 | 2.70 ± 0.85 | 2.54 ± 0.52 | - | - | 0.082 |
Values are means ± SD, n = 9–11 per group. IAS, iron adequate sedentary; IAE, iron adequate exercise; IDS, iron deficient sedentary; IDE, iron deficient exercise.
Femoral Fracture Toughness.
Measures of fracture toughness did not differ between groups (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

Fracture toughness analyses determine at the femur. Values are means ± SD, n = 7–10 per group.
Tibiae Bone Mineral Analysis.
Tibiae bone mineral composition is shown in Figure 6. Independent of activity, iron deficiency resulted in a 57% lower skeletal concentration of iron. Bone zinc levels were 9% higher in iron deficient rats and 5% in exercised rats. These responses were driven by exercise in iron deficiency (9%) and iron deficiency in exercised rats (14%). Independent of iron, exercise increased bone calcium and phosphorous concentrations in bone by 2%.
Figure 6.

Bone mineral composition of the tibia. Values are means ± SD, n = 9–11 per group
DISCUSSION
Two known functions of iron in bone metabolism include the synthesis of collagen and vitamin D activation. Whether iron deficiency affects these processes and impairs bone maturation during increased mechanical loading is unknown and the focus of this research. In young female iron deficient rats we report two novel findings: 1) trabecular bone may be more sensitive to changes in iron status given the increase in MAR and BFR, irrespective of exercise, and 2) zinc accumulates in the tibia to a greater degree when combined with exercise.
As expected, the experimental diet (iron deficiency) resulted in reduced markers of iron status without inducing anemia. The model was, therefore, appropriate for studying the effects of iron deficiency on bone. Rodent models of severe iron deficiency anemia have consistently resulted in increased bone resorption coupled with a decrease in bone mineral content and strength(21–25). However, research focused on iron deficiency and bone health have led to disparate findings and may be due to differences in animal strain, sex, age, physical activity and diet (26, 27). For example, no differences in femoral bone strength were measured in 10-week old male Sprague Dawley rats fed diets similar to the present study and completed 12-weeks of motorized wheel running (26). In contrast, sedentary weanling (3-week) female Long-Evans rats fed an iron deficient diet for 10-weeks demonstrated lower maximum load and stiffness during femoral three-point bending tests (27). In the present study, while the femoral and tibiae composition and maximum load were unaffected by iron deficiency and treadmill running, the higher serum TRAcP 5b and CTx levels indicate bone resorption was higher at the time of measurement. This suggests that other skeletal sites were negatively affected by our experimental protocol. A similar observation was reported by Parelman et al(27), i.e. there was no effect of iron deficiency on femoral trabecular volume or cortical porosity, but a trend for reduced force and size-independent stiffness in the L-4 vertebral core. Research directed toward understanding the bones’ response to nutrient deficiencies and exercise should, therefore, consider measuring loaded and control bone.
The results presented here and the work by others (21–25) suggest that bone responses to iron are dependent upon the magnitude of deficiency. Iron deficiency anemia reduces osteoblast activity, whereas iron deficiency enhances proliferation, differentiation and mineralization function of osteoblasts, and reduces apoptosis(28). Our data corroborate these findings because iron deficiency enhanced dynamic bone formation in the proximal tibia.
Similar to iron, zinc is an essential trace mineral. When iron intake is low, zinc absorption is enhanced since they compete for intestinal absorption(29). We found that iron deficiency reduced iron while increasing zinc in the tibia, and it was highest in exercised rats. The observation that iron deficiency causes reduced iron and increased zinc in bone has been previously reported in the femur of older (22-week) male rats(26). Zinc stimulates gene expression of type I collagen, alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, indicative of bone formation(30), and inhibits osteoclast differentiation(31). Taken together, increased zinc deposition may confer protection against structural deficits during iron deficiency and load bearing exercise. Whether zinc compensates for iron during extended periods of iron deficiency is unknown.
The increase in bone calcium and phosphorous with exercise training further supports the benefits of physical activity on bone modeling during maturation, and may be more important than iron in female rats. Weanling rats experience a rapid increase in whole body bone mineral density (BMD) between two and three months of age followed by stabilization up to 36 months(12). The introduction of treadmill running at six weeks of age leads to further increases in tibial bone mineral content compared to sedentary controls(32), supporting the general consensus that weight-bearing activity has a positive influence on skeletal health(6). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that iron deficiency progressively leads to bone fragility, especially at unloaded sites, and may be exacerbated during longer running training programs.
In summary, femoral or tibiae morphology and mechanical properties are not negatively impacted by 12-weeks of iron deficiency and running exercise in young female rats. Protection may be attributed to marginal iron deficiency and increased zinc, and the positive effects of load bearing exercise. These novel findings do not implicate iron deficiency as causative of bone fragility, and questions a relationship between iron deficiency and stress fractures in female recruits completing BMT.
We, however, cannot exclude the possibility of rat-human differences, and if prolonged iron deficiency does lead to bone loss. In addition, non-loaded sites may have been impacted by iron deficiency and provides justification for measuring different skeletal sites in future investigations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Defense Health Program JPC-5/Military Operational Medicine Research Program (HU0001-19-2-0101), Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University or the Department of Defense.
Conflicts: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Grimm PD, Mauntel TC, Potter BK. Combat and Noncombat Musculoskeletal Injuries in the US Military. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2019;27(3):84–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jones BH, Thacker SB, Gilchrist J, et al. Prevention of lower extremity stress fractures in athletes and soldiers: a systematic review. Epidemiol Rev. 2002;24(2):228–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Medeiros DM. Copper, iron, and selenium dietary deficiencies negatively impact skeletal integrity: A review. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016;241(12):1316–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tuderman L, Myllylä R, Kivirikko KI. Mechanism of the prolyl hydroxylase reaction. 1. Role of co-substrates. Eur J Biochem. 1977;80(2):341–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DeLuca HF. Metabolism of vitamin D: current status. Am J Clin Nutr. 1976;29(11):1258–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weaver CM, Gordon CM, Janz KF, et al. The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(4):1281–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Toxqui L, Vaquero MP. Chronic iron deficiency as an emerging risk factor for osteoporosis: a hypothesis. Nutrients. 2015;7(4):2324–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McClung JP, Karl JP, Cable SJ, et al. Longitudinal decrements in iron status during military training in female soldiers. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(4):605–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McClung JP, Marchitelli LJ, Friedl KE, et al. Prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia among three populations of female military personnel in the US Army. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006;25(1):64–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McClung JP, Gaffney-Stomberg E. Optimizing Performance, Health, and Well-being: Nutritional Factors. Mil Med. 2016;181(1 Suppl):86–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lutz LJ, Gaffney-Stomberg E, Karl JP, et al. Dietary Intake in Relation to Military Dietary Reference Values During Army Basic Combat Training; a Multi-center, Cross-sectional Study. Mil Med. 2019;184(3–4):e223–e30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sengupta S, Arshad M, Sharma S, et al. Attainment of peak bone mass and bone turnover rate in relation to estrous cycle, pregnancy and lactation in colony-bred Sprague-Dawley rats: suitability for studies on pathophysiology of bone and therapeutic measures for its management. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;94(5):421–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaffney-Stomberg E, Lutz LJ, Rood JC, et al. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation maintains parathyroid hormone and improves bone density during initial military training: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Bone. 2014;68:46–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hou X, Amais RS, Jones BT, et al. Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. p. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dempster DW, Compston JE, Drezner MK, et al. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(1):2–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gasier HG, Yu T, Swift JM, et al. Carbon Monoxide and Exercise Prevents Diet-Induced Obesity and Metabolic Dysregulation Without Affecting Bone. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;28(5):924–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moe SM, Chen NX, Newman CL, et al. A comparison of calcium to zoledronic acid for improvement of cortical bone in an animal model of CKD. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(4):902–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vesper EO, Hammond MA, Allen MR, et al. Even with rehydration, preservation in ethanol influences the mechanical properties of bone and how bone responds to experimental manipulation. Bone. 2017;97:49–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ritchie RO, Koester KJ, Ionova S, et al. Measurement of the toughness of bone: a tutorial with special reference to small animal studies. Bone. 2008;43(5):798–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hammond MA, Berman AG, Pacheco-Costa R, et al. Removing or truncating connexin 43 in murine osteocytes alters cortical geometry, nanoscale morphology, and tissue mechanics in the tibia. Bone. 2016;88:85–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Diaz-Castro J, Lopez-Frias MR, Campos MS, et al. Severe nutritional iron-deficiency anaemia has a negative effect on some bone turnover biomarkers in rats. Eur J Nutr. 2012;51(2):241–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Katsumata S, Katsumata-Tsuboi R, Uehara M, et al. Severe iron deficiency decreases both bone formation and bone resorption in rats. J Nutr. 2009;139(2):238–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Katsumata S, Tsuboi R, Uehara M, et al. Dietary iron deficiency decreases serum osteocalcin concentration and bone mineral density in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70(10):2547–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Medeiros DM, Plattner A, Jennings D, et al. Bone morphology, strength and density are compromised in iron-deficient rats and exacerbated by calcium restriction. J Nutr. 2002;132(10):3135–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Medeiros DM, Stoecker B, Plattner A, et al. Iron deficiency negatively affects vertebrae and femurs of rats independently of energy intake and body weight. J Nutr. 2004;134(11):3061–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McClung JP, Andersen NE, Tarr TN, et al. Physical activity prevents augmented body fat accretion in moderately iron-deficient rats. J Nutr. 2008;138(7):1293–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parelman M, Stoecker B, Baker A, et al. Iron restriction negatively affects bone in female rats and mineralization of hFOB osteoblast cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2006;231(4):378–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhao GY, Zhao LP, He YF, et al. A comparison of the biological activities of human osteoblast hFOB1.19 between iron excess and iron deficiency. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012;150(1–3):487–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bodiga S, Krishnapillai MN. Concurrent repletion of iron and zinc reduces intestinal oxidative damage in iron- and zinc-deficient rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(43):5707–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Seo HJ, Cho YE, Kim T, et al. Zinc may increase bone formation through stimulating cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity and collagen synthesis in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Nutr Res Pract. 2010;4(5):356–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yamaguchi M, Uchiyama S. Receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand-stimulated osteoclastogenesis in mouse marrow culture is suppressed by zinc in vitro. Int J Mol Med. 2004;14(1):81–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Iwamoto J, Shimamura C, Takeda T, et al. Effects of treadmill exercise on bone mass, bone metabolism, and calciotropic hormones in young growing rats. J Bone Miner Metab. 2004;22(1):26–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
