Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2022 May 16;13:882647. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.882647

Whole Genome Sequencing, Antibiotic Resistance, and Epidemiology Features of Nontyphoidal Salmonella Isolated From Diarrheic Children: Evidence From North China

Wei Zhao 1,*, Xin Li 2, Xuening Shi 2, Kewei Li 1, Ben Shi 1, Jingyu Sun 1, Chao Zhao 2, Juan Wang 2,*
PMCID: PMC9150820  PMID: 35651495

Abstract

Nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) in children remains a growing burden on public health and often causes children to be hospitalized with diarrheic symptoms. In this work, 260 strains of human Salmonella isolated from Jilin, China were characterized by serotypes and antimicrobial resistance using whole genome sequencing (WGS). The most prevalent serotype was Salmonella enteritidis (47.3%), followed by S. I 4,[5],12:i:- (33.1%), and Salmonella Typhimurium (7.3%). Furthermore, the consistency between resistance phenotype and genotype was confirmed. Similarly, strains harbored blaTEM−1B and tetA genes were detected, which verified the level of resistant phenotype in β-lactams and tetracyclines. The presence of a single mutation in parC, gyrA, and qnrS1 genes corresponding to quinolones was also observed. In our work, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) were found to have a high resolution to molecular traceability, and the combination of both was conducive to practical application in an actual situation. Taking all of this into account, we suggested that the comprehensive surveillance of Salmonella infection in children should be carried out to monitor antimicrobial-resistant trends from various sources and to alert on outbreaks of foodborne diseases to protect public health.

Keywords: nontyphoidal Salmonella, children, antimicrobial resistance, WGS, risk assessment

Introduction

For a few years, nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) infection has been among the most common etiological causes of diarrheal and foodborne diseases (Balasubramanian et al., 2019). It is estimated that over 2.8 billion cases can be attributed to Salmonella infection. Children under 5 years old bear the burden of the major disease, especially in low-income regions (Havelaar et al., 2015; GBD 2017 Non-Typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease collaborators, 2019; Gilchrist and MacLennan, 2019). NTS generally causes self-limiting diarrheal illness, but may typically lead to severe invasive NTS for children's lack of immunity (Abuaita et al., 2021; Rana et al., 2021). Infection with different NTS serovars can present various epidemiological and clinical manifestations. Clinically, acute gastroenteritis with the onset of fever, vomiting, abdominal pains, and various diarrhea are the classic symptoms of NTS (Chen et al., 2013; Aoki et al., 2017). Antimicrobial agents may be required in the cases of invasive NTS (Crump et al., 2015). However, with the widespread use and abuse of antibiotics, especially quinolones and third-generation cephalosporins, drug-resistant bacteria can spread through antimicrobial-resistant genes (ARGs), and multiple drug-resistant (MDR) strains have constantly appeared (McDermott et al., 2018; Kariuki et al., 2019). Furthermore, the increasing rate of antimicrobial resistance poses a serious threat to healthcare systems and public health.

So far, over 2,500 Salmonella enteric serovars have been recognized, and S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium are the most prevalent serotypes (Michael and Schwarz, 2016; Jazeela et al., 2020). In recent years, emerging Salmonella serovars, such as S. I 4,[5],12:i:- have increased rapidly and spread globally. The traditional serotypes determined by a combination of O antigen and H antigens have some limitations. Currently, molecular typing technologies, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have been applied due to their strong specificity, ease of operation, short detection time, and low cost. MLST has been widely used in epidemiology investigation because of its simplicity and repeatability. In addition, it can achieve network data sharing and comparison (Foley et al., 2006; Tang et al., 2019).

At the same time, with the decreasing cost of genome sequencing and the continuous advancement of bioinformation analysis technology, WGS is gradually applied to the outbreak investigation and epidemiological analysis at the forefront of disease prevention and control (Guinea et al., 2021; Papić et al., 2021). WGS-based methods, such as core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), include all core genes loci present in all given isolates. The complete analysis offers a high-resolution readily maintained and easily-shared database only using the same or similar online templates (Maiden et al., 2013).

Considering the important hazard of Salmonella in children, the widespread antibiotic resistance of Salmonella, and the absence of data from north China, the object of this study is to explore the serotypes, antimicrobial resistance, and presence of ARGs in the strains isolated from diarrheic children under 5 years old in Jilin Province. These analyses can be used for risk assessments of diarrheic children and for establishing prevention and control measures against foodborne diseases.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection and Salmonella Serotyping

From 2014 to 2019, a total of 54,962 fecal and anal swab samples eligible were collected from 54,962 patients with diarrhea in 19 sentinel hospitals distributed in the Jilin Province, China. Out of 54,962 samples, 260 were positive for Salmonella for primary identification by sentinel hospitals. Then, further confirmation was conducted by Jilin Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention. First, according to the Chinese national standard GB4789.4 (2016), biochemical identification testing was performed by the Jilin Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention using API20E intestinal bacteria reagent identification strips (bioMerieux, France) for confirmation. Finally, 260 isolates were positive for Salmonella of 54,962 samples. First, raw data were assembled by splicing software SPAdes V3.13.1. Second, Salmonella serotyping was predicted by the genome assembly sequence using SeqSero2 1.2.1 with a software built-in database. Third, according to the Kauffmann–White scheme, serotypes were determined by serum agglutination testing using commercial antisera (SSI, Copenhagen, Denmark) for confirmation. S. Typhimurium ATCC14028 and S. Enteritis CMCC50035 were used for quality control.

Whole Genome Sequencing

Salmonella strains were grown overnight at 37°C on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar, and the strains are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kits (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Genomic DNA libraries were generated using the NEB NEXT ultraTM DNA Library Prep Kit Illumina (NEB, USA). After PCR, the products were purified by the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, USA). DNA concentration was measured by the Qubit®3.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA). The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq6000 system. The obtained reads were trimmed with fqCleanerv.3.0 (Alexis Criscuolo, Institut Pasteur) and assembled using SPAdes v3.13.1 software.

MLST, CgMLST, and Phylogenetic Analysis

BioNumerics 7.7 was used for analyzing sequence types (STs) according to the following traditional seven housekeeping genes aroC, dnaN, hemD, hisD, purE, sucA, and thrA, and sequence data of the isolates were extracted from their genome data. All cgMLST genes were downloaded from the PubMLST website (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_Salmonella_seqdef&page=downloadAlleles&tree=1). The loci in the genome sequences of each isolate were compared with the analysis template in Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) with default settings, a threshold for similarity of 100% and a minimum length of 100%. Phylogenetic analysis was generated using BioNumerics 7.7 (www.applied-maths.com/download/software/).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Salmonella isolates were determined by the broth dilution method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines CLSIM100ED31 (2021). Test antibiotics for Salmonella included ampicillin (AMP), ceftazidime (CAZ), ampicillin-sulbactam (AMS), imipenem (IMP), tetracycline (TET), nalidixic acid (NAL), cefoxitin (CFX), chloramphenicol (CHL), cefotaxime (CTX), cefazolin (CFZ), gentamicin (GEN), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), azithromycin (AZM), and ciprofloxacin (CIP). Escherichia coli ATCC™ 25922 was used as a quality control strain.

Antimicrobial Resistance Genes of Salmonella

Based on the genome annotation results in the Prokka 1.12, we compared the assembled genomes with ARGs databases, such as CARD (https://card.mcmaster.ca), ARDB (https://link.zhihu.com/?target=http%3A//ardb.cbcb.umd.edu/), and BacMet (http://bacmet.biomedicine.gu.se/) using ResFinder 4.0 software. We identified the presence of antimicrobial genes when the coverage was ≥70% and the identity was > 70%.

Results

Prevalence and Serotypes of NTS Isolated From Diarrheal Children

From to 2019, a total of 260 stool samples from diarrheal children were collected. Most of the samples were isolated in Jilin city (n = 87), while the lowest was from Siping city (n = 2). The distribution of Salmonella isolates across 9 cities of Jilin province is shown in Supplementary Table 3. In 260 isolated strains, S. Enteritidis accounted for 47.3% of all the collected isolates. S. I 4,[5],12:i:- (86/260) was second to the former. Abundant causative serovars, such as Agona, appeared in diarrheal children in various cities. The distribution of Salmonella serotypes with years is detailed in Supplementary Table 4.

Epidemiology Features of NTS Infections

According to the data, 59.6% (155/260) of children were male, with the age ranging from 7 days to 60 months (Table 1). In total, 21.5% (56/260) of children were few months of age. The included children had a percentage of 13.5% (35/260) in hospitalization. In total, 22.7% (59/260) of these children were in treatment for acute mucoid diarrhea, and the remaining majority had watery stool, while the minority had diarrhea with visible blood. Abdominal pain was also relatively common in a series of symptoms (46/260). Other symptoms, such as fever (80/260) and vomiting (42/260), always appeared with the above-mentioned symptoms. No severe death was recorded. Suspected food consists of fruits and associated food, mixed food, egg and egg products, and animal products (Supplementary Table 1). However, most incidences may be attributed to unknown causes. One of the mainly suspicious exposed sources was fruits and mixed food. Egg and animal products also account for part of reason.

Table 1.

Demographic and epidemiology features of diarrheal children infected with nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) (n = 260).

Characteristic(s), symptoms, or outcome Value (no. [%])
Gender
Male 155 (59.6)
Female 105 (40.4)
Age
Age in months 56 (21.5)
Age of 1 to 5 204 (78.5)
Clinical symptoms
Mucoid diarrhea 59 (22.7)
Blood diarrhea 7 (2.7)
Watery stool 164 (63.1)
Abdominal pain 46 (17.7)
Vomiting 42(16.2)
Fever (>37.5°C) 80 (30.8)
Outcome
Inpatient 35 (13.5)
Outpatient 225 (86.5)
Suspected exposed food
Fruits 68 (26.2)
Eggs and egg products 8 (3.1)
Mixed food 30 (11.5)
Animal products 17 (6.5)
Unknown food 137 (52.7)

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

As shown in Table 2, high resistance to ampicillin (79.6%), ampicillin-sulbactam (47.7%), and cefazolin (45.8%) were predominated over other β-lactams. Correspondingly, nalidixic acid (60.8%) and tetracyclines (60.8%) showed higher resistance in quinolones and tetracyclines classes. Interestingly, none of the isolates were resistant to imipenem in this study. A total of 203 strains (78.1%) were resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents and classified as MDR. Of 260 strains, 58 strains (22.3%) were resistant to five or more classes of antimicrobial agents. Only 5 strains (1.9%) were susceptible to all tested antimicrobial agents.

Table 2.

The resistance of NTS isolates from diarrheal children in 2014–2019.

Antimicrobial class Antimicrobial agents No. of strains (N/%)
Resistant (R) Intermediate (I) Susceptible (S)
Penicillins Ampicillin (AMP) 207 79.6 1 0.4 52 20.0
β-lactam combination agents Ampicillin-sulbactam (AMS) 124 47.7 78 30.0 58 22.3
Cephems Cefotaxime (CTX) 37 14.2 4 1.5 219 84.2
Ceftazidime (CAZ) 7 2.7 6 2.4 247 95.0
Cefoxitin (CFX) 2 0.8 10 3.8 248 95.4
Cefazolin (CFZ) 119 45.8 76 29.2 119 45.8
Sulfonamides Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) 66 25.4 - - 194 74.6
Aminoglycosides Gentamicin (GEN) 27 10.4 7 2.7 226 86.9
Quinolones Nalidixic acid (NAL) 158 60.8 - - 102 39.2
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 32 12.3 159 61.2 69 26.5
Phenicols Chloramphenicol (CHL) 46 17.7 9 3.5 205 78.8
Carbapenems Imipenem (IMP) 0 0 2 0.8 258 99.2
Tetracyclines Tetracyclines (TET) 158 60.8 11 4.2 91 35.0
Macrolides Azithromycin (AZM) 25 9.6 _ _ 235 90.4
Pansusceptible 5 1.9
≥1 antimicrobial class 255 98.1
MDR ≥3 antimicrobial class 203 78.1
≥5 antimicrobial class 58 22.3
≥7 antimicrobial class 14 5.4

Occurrence of ARGs

According to the detailed results of drug resistance genes (Table 3), the predominant ARG confirmed was aac (6')-Iaa (99.6%), followed by blaTEM−1B (63.1%), sul2 (58.8%), and aph (3”)-Ib (53.5%). On the contrary, some genes, such as tet G (0.4%) and mph A (2.3%) were rarely identified. The other drug-resistance genes ranged from 4.6 to 53.5%. The predominant ARG identified in β-lactams resistant isolates was blaTEM−1B (63.1%). Aminoglycoside class contained aac(6')-Iaa, aph(6)-Id, and aph(3”)-Ib. Sulfonamide class-resistant isolates were mainly positive for sul1, sul2, and sul3. Among the tetracycline class, tet A, tet B, tet M, and tet G genes were listed.

Table 3.

Major antimicrobial genes and composition distribution in Salmonella strains.

Antimicrobial classes Antimicrobial resistance genes Number of strains (%)
β-Lactams blaTEM−1B 63.1% (164/260)
blaOXA−1 4.6% (12/260)
blaCTXM−55 2.7% (7/260)
blaCTXM−14 4.6%(12/260)
Sulfonamides sul1 11.2% (29/260)
sul2 58.8% (153/260)
sul3 9.6% (25/260)
Aminoglycoside ac (6')-Iaa 99.6%(259/260)
aph (6)-Id 53.5%(139/260)
aph (3”)-Ib 53.5% (139/260)
Phenicols floR 11.9% (31/260)
cmlA1 10% (26/260)
catB3 4.6% (12/260)
Tetracyclines tet A 17.3% (45/260)
tet B 33.8% (88/260)
tet M 5% (13/260)
tet G 0.4% (1/260)
Quinolone qnrS1 7.3% (19/260)
aac (6')-Ib-cr 6.9% (18/260)
oqxA 5.4% (14/260)
oqxB 5.4% (14/260)
Macrolides mph(A) 2.3% (6/260)

MLST Analysis

According to the minimum spanning tree (MST) generated by serotypes (Figure 1), 18 international sequence types (STs) were identified in the 260 Salmonella strains and divided into 19 clusters. The dominant type was ST11 (113/260), followed by ST34 (91/260) and ST19 (12/260). However, 10 strains failed to classify into types. The MST based on cities of isolates is also constructed in Supplementary Figure 1. In this study, the results of MLST and serotyping from 260 isolates of patients with diarrhea in Jilin Province exhibited that these two types have good correspondence, except ST34. However, as shown in Figure 1, S. Enteritidis (ST11), S. Typhimurium (ST19/ST34), S. I 4,[5],12:i:- (ST34), S. Agona (ST13), S. London (ST155), S. Stanley (ST29), S. Litchfield (ST214), S. I 4:b:- (ST423), S. Stanley (ST29), and S. Thompson (ST26) showed associated profiles.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Minimum spanning tree (MST) of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for 260 Salmonella strains. Allele distances among strains were labeled and STs were coded. The circle size represented the number of strains. The circle's color was filled according to serotypes and shades of gray indicated a close tie with strains.

CgMLST Analysis and Phylogenetic Analysis

An MST analysis of 260 Salmonella strains was based on serotypes and cities of cgMLST (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 2). Compared with the MST analysis based on MLST, more detailed and intuitive associations of serotypes were displayed on cgMLST and mainly divided into B, C, and D parts. The B and D clusters showed the same STs. However, an apparent connection classified based on the cities was still not observed. A phylogenetic analysis based on cgMLST of 260 Salmonella strains is presented in Figure 3. The phylogenetic dendrogram included name, year, city, serotypes, STs, antimicrobial resistance profiles, and antimicrobials resistance genes profiles. In total, 260 Salmonella strains were defined as 208 tiny clusters that were in accordance with STs arrangement. The isolates were mainly grouped into three clusters (denoted as A, B, and C). Cluster A contained 92 isolates, such as S.I 4,[5],12:i:- and S. Typhimurium (Supplementary Figure 3), and they showed similar indexes ranging from 57.2 to 100%. Cluster B was the most in number and composed of 123 S. Enteritidis strains with a similar index of at least 60.7% (Supplementary Figure 4). Only 9 S. Typhimurium isolates were included in cluster C, and they presented nine patterns with a minimum similarity index of 77.7% (Supplementary Figure 5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Minimum spanning tree of core genome MLST for 260 Salmonella strains. Every strain was filled with different colors according to its serotypes. Allele distances among B, C and D strains were labeled. The circle size represented the number of strains. (A) In total, 260 Salmonella strains MST based on core genome MLST (cgMLST). (B) The upper layers filled with red Salmonella strains showed the same STs of 34. (C) The middle scatter Salmonella strains with no serotype distribution law. (D) The lower layer filled with green Salmonella strains was all ST11.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phylogenetic analysis of 260 Salmonella strains from diarrheic children. The entries were arranged above the picture. Isolates, such as 003_2014 and A019_2016 with no allelic differences could be identified as the same clone. Discrepancies of alleles exceeding the scale above were considered unrelated. The dendrogram mainly contains A, B, and C three parts, corresponding to 92 S.I 4,[5],12:i:- and Salmonella Typhimurium strains, 123 Salmonella Enteritidis strains, and 9 S. Typhimurium isolates. The similarity index was labeled over the clusters to show the genetic relationships.

Discussion

Our study combined clinical epidemiology and genomic data to depict the characteristics of NTS infections in northern China. In line with recent findings (Li et al., 2014; Zhan et al., 2019), S. Enteritidis and S. I 4,[5],12:i:- are the leading Salmonella serovars. S.I 4,[5],12:i:- currently represents the common serotype among human cases in many countries (Seixas et al., 2018; He et al., 2020). This serovar first appeared in the 1990s but increased considerably in the last 10 years, especially in Europe and Asia (Kawakami et al., 2019). The appearance of S. I 4,[5],12:i:- was always associated with foodborne disease outbreaks and accompanied by the MDR strains (Mølbak et al., 2014; Elnekave et al., 2018). Therefore, monitoring trends in various serovars over time and developing public health methods may help in focusing on preventative strategies. Our study has made a detailed epidemiological description based on symptoms of diarrhea cases. However, due to no certain evidence of suspected food and Salmonella diarrheas onset, the exact exposed food was missing. It was also impossible to identify the possible sources of infection for every sporadic case.

The emergence of Salmonella infections with MDR has become a major threat to public health worldwide. In our study, 203 (78.1%) isolated NTS were classified as MDR among 260 strains, and resistance occurred to antibiotics commonly used in treatment. A similar incidence rate was presented in studies by Duong et al. (2020) . In addition, four strains from children under the age of 1 were resistant to at least seven antimicrobials, and these results highlighted the need for effective surveillance of antimicrobials management in China. At present, the third generation cephalosporins antimicrobials are the new preferred antimicrobial therapy instead of quinolones in clinical trials for Salmonella infection (Kariuki et al., 2015). Different from the high resistance of quinolones, 14.2 and 2.7% resistant rates were observed in cefotaxime and ceftazidime, respectively. Similarly, a relatively low resistant rate was also observed in Brazil (Viana et al., 2020) and Greece (Mellou et al., 2021).

The consistency between genomic and phenotypic investigations has been successfully verified in our study. Resistance genes, such as blaTEM−1B, blaOXA−1, blaCTXM−55, and blaCTXM−14 that belonged to β-lactams were detected. The highest frequency of blaTEM−1B of strains was consistent with studies in eastern China (Zheng et al., 2021). Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) blaCTXM−55 were also detected. The carbapenems are the critical “last resort” antimicrobials to Salmonella infections for their stability toward ESBLs (Fernández et al., 2018), and in our study, the strains remain susceptible in phenotype and genotype.

According to the data (Hopkins et al., 2005; Zhan et al., 2019), mutations in chromosome and plasmid-mediated resistance genes all contributed to quinolones resistance, which is commonly used quinolones for Salmonellosis. Similar to a previous report in Taiwan (Fang et al., 2021), mutations in parC and gyrA were more likely to cause the resistance of quinolones.

Moreover, resistance to quinolones can be acquired by plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes, such as oqxAB. As shown in Supplementary Table 5, 28 of 170 quinolones resistance strains harbored PMQR genes. As for plasmid-mediated genes, the qnrS1 gene was also detected in retail food (Yang et al., 2020), which may prove the horizontal transfer of plasmids. Previous studies reported that quinolones were strongly linked to the overuse of antibiotics in food animals (de Jong et al., 2012; Redgrave et al., 2014). Meanwhile, quinolones have just been out of use in food-producing animals in China since 2018 (Cuypers et al., 2018). Moreover, previous findings also described quinolones as therapy producing resistance to food and water-borne infections (Threlfall, 2002; Molina et al., 2016). Hence, further efforts are warranted to control the spread of resistance trends from multiple sources. In our study, we found that blaTEM−1B and oxqAB coexisted in four MDR strains. This suggested that the common existence of these genes leads to resistance to both quinolone and β-lactams. Further efforts to explore the transmission and influence of multiply classes of antibiotics coexistence will be of interest.

Multilocus sequence typing was used for the epidemiology investigation of NTS in our study. ST11 and ST34 were the predominant types, which was in line with the distribution of animal farms and retailed foods in China (Yang et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020). These findings support the widespread transmission of Salmonella strains among different regions. MLST and cgMLST showed a high level of molecular traceability. The tree diagrams based on MLST and cgMLST indicated that human Salmonella cases with unrelated epidemiological backgrounds were apt to be sporadic (Tönnies et al., 2021). In this study, consistency between MLST sequence type and phenotypic serotype was found to provide evidence for the genetic structure of Salmonella. However, 13 strains were not distinguished. It indicates that MLST cannot distinguish all isolates. Compared with MLST, cgMLST based on WGS presented a relatively high resolution, but more equipment and time were necessary. The combination of the two types can provide the origin and evolution basis of Salmonella strains and reveal the evolution and variation.

Conclusion

In this article, we analyzed the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of NTS isolated from diarrheic children. Besides, S. Typhimurium and S. I 4,[5],12:i:- were the dominant serotypes. A considerable increasing AMR prevalence rate was observed, providing evidence between resistant phenotype and genotype. MLST and cgMLST were performed for serotype clustering, while cgMLST had high resolution and good repeatability. In conclusion, our study showed the genetic diversity of NTS isolates from diarrheic children and suggested the monitoring of antibiotic resistance and dominant STs of Salmonella in children.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI - PRJNA817369.

Author Contributions

WZ, CZ, and JW: conceptualization. KL, BS, and JS: experiment investigation. XL, XS, and WZ: writing, original draft preparation, and revising. JW provided critical comments on this work. All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82073603) and the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Item (grant number 20210204139YY).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.882647/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Abuaita B. H., Lawrence A. E., Berger R. P., Hill D. R., Huang S., Yadagiri V. K., et al. (2021). Comparative transcriptional profiling of the early host response to infection by typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars in human intestinal organoids. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009987. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aoki Y., Kitazawa K., Kobayashi H., Senda M., Arahata Y., Homma R., et al. (2017). Clinical features of children with nontyphoidal Salmonella bacteremia: a single institution survey in rural Japan. PloS ONE. 12, e0176990. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balasubramanian R., Im J., Lee J. S., Jeon H. J., Mogeni O. D., Kim J. H., et al. (2019). The global burden and epidemiology of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infections. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 15, 1421–1426. 10.1080/21645515.2018.1504717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen H. M., Wang Y., Su L. H., Chiu C. H. (2013). Nontyphoid Salmonella infection: microbiology, clinical features, and antimicrobial therapy. Pediatr. Neonatol. 54, 147–152. 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crump J. A., Sjölund-Karlsson M., Gordon M. A., Parry C. M. (2015). Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28, 901–937. 10.1128/CMR.00002-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuypers W. L., Jacobs J., Wong V., Klemm E. J., Deborggraeve S., Van Puyvelde S. (2018). Fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella: insights by whole-genome sequencing. Microb. Genom. 4, e000195. 10.1099/mgen.0.000195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de Jong A., Stephan B., Silley P. (2012). Fluoroquinolone resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from healthy livestock and poultry in the EU. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112(2), 239–245. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05193.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Duong V. T., The H. C. Nhu T., Tuyen H. T., Campbell J. I., Minh P. V. (2020). Genomic serotyping, clinical manifestations, and antimicrobial resistance of nontyphoidal salmonella gastroenteritis in hospitalized children in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. J. Clin. Microbiol. 58, e01465–20. 10.1128/JCM.01465-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elnekave E., Hong S., Mather A. E., Boxrud D., Taylor A. J., Lappi V., et al. (2018). Salmonella enterica serotype 4,[5],12:i:- in Swine in the United States Midwest: an emerging multidrug-resistant clade. Clin. Infect. Dis. 66, 877–885. 10.1093/cid/cix909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fang S. B., Lauderdale T. Y., Huang C. H., Chang P. R., Wang Y. H., Shigemura K., et al. (2021). Genotypic diversity of ciprofloxacin nonsusceptibility and its relationship with minimum inhibitory concentrations in nontyphoidal Salmonella Clinical isolates in Taiwan. Antibiotics (Basel). 10, 1383. 10.3390/antibiotics10111383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernández J., Guerra B., Rodicio M. R. (2018). Resistance to carbapenems in non-typhoidal salmonella enterica serovars from humans, animals and food. Vet. Sci. 5, 40. 10.3390/vetsci5020040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Foley S. L., White D. G., McDermott P. F., Walker R. D., Rhodes B., Fedorka-Cray P. J., et al. (2006). Comparison of subtyping methods for differentiating Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates obtained from food animal sources. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 3569–3577. 10.1128/JCM.00745-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GBD 2017 Non-Typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease collaborators (2019). The global burden of non-typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease: a systematic analysis for the Global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, 1312–1324. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30418-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilchrist J. J., MacLennan C. A. (2019). Invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease in Africa. EcoSal. Plus. 8, 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0007-2018. 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0007-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guinea J., Mezquita S., Gómez A., Padilla B., Zamora E., Sánchez-Luna M., et al. (2021). Whole genome sequencing confirms Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis microsatellite sporadic and persistent clones causing outbreaks of candidemia in neonates. Med. Mycol. 60, myab068. 10.1093/mmy/myab068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Havelaar A. H., Kirk M. D., Torgerson P. R., Gibb H. J., Hald T., Lake R. J., et al. (2015). World health organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 12, e1001923. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. He J., Sun F., Sun D., Wang Z., Jin S., Pan Z., et al. (2020). Multidrug resistance and prevalence of quinolone resistance genes of Salmonella enterica serotypes 4,[5],12:i:- in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 330, 108692. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hopkins K. L., Davies R. H., Threlfall E. J. (2005). Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: recent developments. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 25, 358–373. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jazeela K., Chakraborty A., Karunasagar I., Deekshit V. K. (2020). Nontyphoidal Salmonella: a potential anticancer agent. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128(1), 2–14. 10.1111/jam.14297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kariuki S., Gordon M. A., Feasey N., Parry C. M. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance and management of invasive Salmonella disease. Vaccine. 33, C21–C29. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kariuki S., Mbae C., Onsare R., Kavai S. M., Wairimu C., Ngetich R., et al. (2019). Multidrug-resistant nontyphoidal salmonella hotspots as targets for vaccine use in management of infections in endemic settings. Clin. Infect. Dis. 68, S10–S15. 10.1093/cid/ciy898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kawakami V., Bottichio L., Lloyd J., Carleton H., Leeper M., Olson G., et al. (2019). Multidrug-resistant Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- and Salmonella infantis infections linked to whole roasted pigs from a single slaughter and processing facility. J. Food Prot. 82, 1615–1624. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li Y., Xie X., Xu X., Wang X., Chang H., Wang C., et al. (2014). Nontyphoidal Salmonella infection in children with acute gastroenteritis: prevalence, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance in Shanghai, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 11, 200–206. 10.1089/fpd.2013.1629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li Y., Yang X., Zhang H., Jia H., Liu X., Yu B., et al. (2020). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella in the commercial eggs in China. J. Food Microbiol. 325, 108623. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maiden M. C., Jansen van Rensburg M. J., Bray J. E., Earle S. G., Ford S. A., Jolley K. A., et al. (2013). MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 728–736. 10.1038/nrmicro3093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McDermott P. F., Zhao S., Tate H. (2018). Antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella. Microbiol Spectr. 6, 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0014-2017. 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0014-2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mellou K., Gkova M., Panagiotidou E., Tzani M., Sideroglou T., Mandilara G. (2021). Diversity and resistance profiles of human non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. in Greece, 2003-2020. Antibiotics (Basel). 10, 983. 10.3390/antibiotics10080983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Michael G. B., Schwarz S. (2016). Antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic nontyphoidal Salmonella: an alarming trend? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 22, 968–974. 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mølbak K., Simonsen J., Jørgensen C. S., Krogfelt K. A., Falkenhorst G., Ethelberg S., et al. (2014). Seroincidence of human infections with nontyphoid Salmonella compared with data from public health surveillance and food animals in 13 European countries. Clin. Infect. Dis. 59, 1599–1606. 10.1093/cid/ciu627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Molina A., Granados-Chinchilla F., Jiménez M., Acuña-Calvo M. T., Alfaro M., Chavarría G. (2016). Vigilance for Salmonella in feedstuffs available in costa rica: prevalence, serotyping and tetracycline resistance of isolates obtained from 2009 to 2014. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 13, 119–127. 10.1089/fpd.2015.2050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Papić B., Kušar D., Mićunović J., Vidrih Š., Pirš M., Ocepek M., et al. (2021). Genomic insights into Salmonella Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf outbreak reveal possible interspecies transmission. Vet Microbiol. 263, 109282. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rana S., Maurya S., Mohapatra G., Singh S., Babar R., Chandrasekhar H., et al. (2021). Activation of epigenetic regulator KDM6B by Salmonella Typhimurium enables chronic infections. Gut Microbes. 13, 1986665. 10.1080/19490976.2021.1986665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Redgrave L. S., Sutton S. B., Webber M. A., Piddock L. J. (2014). Fluoroquinolone resistance: mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success. Trends Microbiol. 22, 438–445. 10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Seixas R., Nunes T., Machado J., Tavares L., Owen S. P., Bernardo F., et al. (2018). Demographic characterization and spatial cluster analysis of human Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:-infections in Portugal: A 10year study. J. Infect. Public Health. 11, 178–182. 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tang S., Orsi R. H., Luo H., Ge C., Zhang G., Baker R. C., et al. (2019). Assessment and comparison of molecular subtyping and characterization methods for Salmonella. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1591. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Threlfall E. J.. (2002). Antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella: problems and perspectives in food- and water-borne infections. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26, 141–148. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00606.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tönnies H., Prior K., Harmsen D., Mellmann A. (2021). Establishment and evaluation of a core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for whole-genome sequence-based typing of pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 59, e01987–20. 10.1128/JCM.01987-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Viana C., Grossi J. L., Sereno M. J., Yamatogi R. S., Bersot L., Call D. R., et al. (2020). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from a Brazilian pork production chain. Food Res. Int. 137, 109406. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang J., Gao S., Chang Y., Su M., Xie Y., Sun S. (2019). Occurrence and characterization of Salmonella isolated from large-scale breeder farms in Shandong Province, China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 8159567. 10.1155/2019/8159567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang J., Zhang Z., Zhou X., Cui Y., Shi C., Shi X. (2020). Prevalence and characterization of antimicrobial resistance in salmonella enterica isolates from retail foods in Shanghai, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 17, 35–43. 10.1089/fpd.2019.2671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhan Z., Xu X., Gu Z., Meng J., Wufuer X., Wang M., et al. (2019). Molecular epidemiologyand antimicrobial resistance of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella in China, 2007-2016. Infect. Drug Resist. 12, 2885–2897. 10.2147/IDR.S210961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zheng D., Ma K., Du J., Zhou Y., Wu G., Qiao X., et al. (2021). Characterization of human origin Salmonella Serovar I 4,[5],12:i:-in Eastern China, 2014 to 2018. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 18, 790–797. 10.1089/fpd.2021.0008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI - PRJNA817369.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES