Skip to main content
Cambridge Open Access logoLink to Cambridge Open Access
. 2012 Dec 3;141(10):2187–2191. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812002695

Early high CMV seroprevalence in pregnant women from a population with a high rate of congenital infection

A Y YAMAMOTO 1,*, R A C CASTELLUCCI 1, D C ARAGON 1, M M MUSSI-PINHATA 1
PMCID: PMC9151393  PMID: 23200458

SUMMARY

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rates increase with maternal seroprevalence due to transmission from maternal non-primary infection. CMV seroprevalence estimates of pregnant women are needed for planning strategies against congenital CMV transmission. We aimed to determine the age-specific prevalence of serum antibodies for CMV in a representative age-stratified sample of unselected pregnant women from a Brazilian population. A total of 985 pregnant women, aged 12–46 years (median 24 years), were enrolled. Overall CMV seroprevalence was 97% (95% confidence interval 95·8–98·0), with age-specific (years) prevalence as follows: 12–19 (96·3%), 20–24 (97·7%), 25–29 (97·1%), and 30–46 (96·7%). CMV seroprevalence is almost universal (97%) and is found at similar levels in pregnant women of ages ranging from 12 to 46 years. Because high CMV seroprevalence is found even in women of a younger age in this population, this finding suggests that the majority of primary CMV infections occur early, in infancy or childhood. As a consequence, vaccines currently under development to prevent primary infection may not be a solution for the prevention of congenital CMV infection in this population.

Key words: CMV, cytomegalovirus, IgG antibodies, pregnant women, seroprevalence

INTRODUCTION

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most frequent intrauterine infection and the main non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss in infancy [1]. The incidence of congenital CMV infection and disease vary according to the epidemiological and immunological characteristics of the population of women of childbearing age [2]. High rates of congenital CMV infections have been consistently found in populations with a high seroprevalence [2]. Anticipating the risk of CMV vertical transmission and planning preventive measures are facilitated by knowing these characteristics.

Most of the available CMV seroprevalence data for Brazilian pregnant women are a decade old and were derived from hospital-based studies [3, 4]. Although a large study based on neonatal universal screening showed a high prevalence of congenital CMV infection in infants born to low-income women from the southeast region of Brazil [5], the maternal age-specific CMV seroprevalence rate in this population is not yet known.

The main objective of this study was to determine the age-specific prevalence of serum antibodies for CMV in a representative sample of unselected pregnant women from a population utilizing the public health system in Ribeirão Preto, a city located in the southeast region of Brazil in the state of São Paulo.

METHODS

The study population consisted of pregnant women belonging to the low- to middle-income stratum who received prenatal care from the unified public health system (SUS). Sample size estimates were based on published CMV seroprevalence data [6] using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a desired 2% precision. These parameters yielded a minimum sample of 1063 pregnant women. The sample was stratified into the following age groups: 12–19, 20–24, 25–29, and ⩾30 years. From September 2005 to September 2006, a total of 4615 pregnant women were assisted in the 36 primary-care public units in Ribeirão Preto. The number of pregnant women to be enrolled per age group in each urban residential district was determined on the basis of the proportion of pregnant women observed in each district (East, West, South, North, Centre).

Serum samples from pregnant women were obtained from a general repository in a public health laboratory consisting of anonymous residual serum specimens, which were obtained during prenatal care after routine serological tests were performed. The specific samples to be tested from each district and age group were selected via a computer-generated random number list. The first sample obtained during pregnancy from each participant was selected. Birth data, the date the sample was taken, and information about local residence were collected from each woman. No data concerning parity, number of living children, or professional or marital status were available.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital (Process no. 1952/2009). A waiver of informed consent was obtained from this Committee.

Laboratory assays

A commercial enzyme immunosorbent (Vidas; bioMérieux, France) was used for the quantitation of specific IgG CMV antibodies. Sera samples with antibody titres <4 AU/ml were considered negative; titres from 4 AU/ml to <6 AU/ml were considered equivocal; and titres ⩾6 AU/ml were considered positive. The results were quantitatively expressed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sera samples with titres in the equivocal range were retested once, and the sera samples that were still in the equivocal range were presented as equivocal.

Data analysis

The data obtained were analysed by the SAS system, version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., USA). Seroprevalence was determined according to the age groups of interest with 95% CI calculations. Testing for associations between CMV antibody seropositivity and age group was performed using Fisher's exact test. Arithmetic means and mean deviations were calculated for the CMV antibody titres from each age group. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed after the natural logarithmic transformation of CMV antibody titres according to age group was conducted.

RESULTS

The median age of the pregnant women was 24 years (range 12–46 years). Serum samples for 75/1063 (7%) participants were not available and could not be tested. A total of 988/1063 (92·9%) participants had available samples for the quantification of CMV IgG antibodies. Of the 988 pregnant women, 29 (2·9%) were seronegative and three (0·3%) had antibody titres in the equivocal range. Thus, the overall estimate of CMV seroprevalence in 985 pregnant women was 97% (95% CI 95·8–98·0). The proportion of seropositive pregnant women in each age group is shown in Table 1. There was no significant increase of CMV seropositivity based on age. Additionally, the CMV seroprevalence rates did not differ significantly between women from the five different residential districts; the rates ranged from 95·3% in the North to 96·8% in the Centre district.

Table 1.

Age-specific CMV seroprevalence in 985 pregnant women

Age group (years) N Seropositive Overall seroprevalence (95% CI)
12–19 216 208 96·3% (92·8–98·3)
20–24 310 303 97·7% (95·4–99·1)
25–29 245 238 97·1% (94·2–98·8)
30–46 214 207 96·7% (93·4–98·7)
Total 985 956 97·0% (95·8–98·0)

CI, Confidence interval.

Fisher's exact test (P value = 0·78).

The mean values (standard deviations) of CMV antibody titres (AU/ml) for the 12–19, 20–24, 25–29, and ⩾30 years age groups were 82·3 (39·4), 79·5 (44·7), 83·7 (49·5), and 90·6 (44·5), respectively. Figure 1 shows the distribution of these titres according to age group. Overall, the antibody titres varied according to age group (P = 0·04). However, only the titres detected in the ⩾30 years age group were found to be significantly higher than those in the 20–25 years age group (mean difference –0·15, 95% CI –0·24 to –0·05, P < 0·01).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Boxplots of CMV antibody titres (AU/ml) after the natural logarithmical transformation according to age group.

DISCUSSION

Adding to the knowledge of CMV epidemiology in Brazilian pregnant women from a population with a high-birth prevalence of congenital CMV infection [5], we found that CMV seroprevalence is almost universal (97%) and similar in pregnant women from four age groups ranging from 12 to 46 years, even in those in the youngest age group (12–19 years). These findings are consistent with those detected in pregnant women in other developing countries [79] and suggest that the majority of primary CMV infections occurs early in this population, i.e. in infancy or childhood. By contrast to rates found in developed countries, where ∼50% of pregnant women are CMV seropositive [1012], our results indicate that ∼95% of pregnant women became naturally seroimmune by a median age of 18 years. These findings are in accordance with our previous findings of the high birth prevalence of congenital CMV infection in this population, as it has been consistently demonstrated that congenital CMV infection rates increase with maternal seroprevalence due to transmission from maternal recurrent infections [13, 14]. Furthermore, although this study is restricted to pregnant women, the detected age prevalence profile is consistent with that observed in Brazilian blood donors [15] and suggests that most women from this population are no longer susceptible to primary infection with this virus during childbearing age.

The early occurrence of primary CMV infection in this population can probably be explained by conditions predisposing to frequent CMV exposure in childhood and adolescence. A retrospective survey for CMV antibodies in an urban Brazilian community showed that the first increase in CMV seropositivity was observed before age 5 years, when 60% of individuals had detectable CMV antibodies. At age 15 years there was a second increase in this seropositivity, suggesting a sexual component for the transmission of the virus [6]. The high percentage of seropositive mothers is expected to be the main source of infection for young infants either through breastfeeding, which is practised by 85% of mothers by age 4 months and 55% by age 1 year [16], or by means of close contact with mother's secretions such as saliva and urine. We have previously detected CMV viruria in 38·2% of non-congenitally infected infants from this population aged 3–6 months [17]. After the second year of life, non-maternal sources of infection may enhance viral transmission. Close contact between children at home or at day-care centres, and a high number of people in the household may be possible modes of viral spread during childhood. In addition, nearly half of Brazilian adolescents have had their first sexual intercourse at a mean age of 15 years, irrespective of gender [18].

With respect to viral antibody titres, the overall relative stability of CMV antibody levels between the younger and older age groups detected in this study is a likely consequence of the ability of CMV to cause recurrent infections and the frequent viral exposure within this population. Whereas antibody titres elicited after infection with viruses such as rubella, for which long-lasting protective immunity is produced, tend to decrease over time [19], we found a tendency towards higher levels of CMV antibody in the youngest age group with a slight decrease in women from the 20–24 years age group and an increase from this point in the older age groups. However, the difference of titres was only statistically demonstrated between women aged 20–24 years and those aged 30–46 years. These features could be explained by more recent primary infections in the youngest women and the boosting of the immune response following viral reactivation [20], or natural exposure to multiple CMV strains in older women (who therefore may have had more intense and prolonged antibody response to the cumulative viral reactivation or exposure over time) [21]. In view of these findings, and considering our previous demonstration that congenital CMV disease also occurs in this population [5, 22] at a similar frequency to its occurrence in populations in which only half of the women of childbearing age are susceptible to primary infection [2325], it is likely that boosting the antibody production using vaccines against CMV will not be enough to confer protection against congenital CMV infection and/or disease in highly seroimmune populations. Thus, a better understanding of the virus–host interaction, viral immune evasion mechanisms during gestation, and the factors that facilitate maternal–fetal transmission of this virus in women from these populations are still warranted.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that most low-income pregnant women utilizing the public health system of a southeast Brazilian city are CMV seropositive from an early age. Nationally representative CMV seroprevalence and epidemiological studies, which should additionally include women from higher-income backgrounds, are needed to evaluate the risk factors for primary and non-primary infections in women of childbearing age and pregnant women. These studies will be crucial before a specific strategy for the prevention of congenital CMV infection and/or disease, such as immunizing with vaccines currently under development [26], can be made available.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa, Ensino e Assistência do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FAEPA), Brazil. We are grateful to Cláudia Siqueira Vassimon, supervisor of the Central Health District Castelo Branco, Ribeirão Preto, for her assistance in providing the prenatal serum specimens stored in the central repository.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fowler KB, Boppana SB. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and hearing deficit. Journal of Clinical Virology 2006; 35: 226–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Reviews in Medical Virology 2007; 17: 253–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Suassuna JH, Leite LL, Villela LH. Prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in different patient groups of an urban university in Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 1995; 28: 105–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pannuti CS, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Occurrence in two socioeconomically distinct populations of a developing country. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 1985; 27: 105–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mussi-Pinhata MM, et al. Birth prevalence and natural history of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a highly seroimmune population. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009; 49: 522–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Almeida LN, et al. Cytomegalovirus seroepidemiology in an urban community of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Revista de Saude Publica 2001; 35: 124–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tabatabaee M, Tayyebi D. Seroepidemiologic study of human cytomegalovirus in pregnant women in Valiasr Hospital of Kazeroon, Fars, Iran. Journal of Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2009; 22: 517–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Uyar Y, et al. Prevalence of rubella and cytomegalovirus antibodies among pregnant women in northern Turkey. New Microbiology 2008: 31: 451–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cannon MJ, Schmid DS, Hyde TB. Review of cytomegalovirus seroprevalence and demographic characteristics associated with infection. Reviews in Medical Virology 2010; 20: 202–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tookey PA, Ades AE, Peckham CS. Cytomegalovirus prevalence in pregnant women: the influence of parity. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 1992; 67: 779–783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gratacap-Cavallier B, et al. Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence in French pregnant women: parity and place of birth as major predictive factors. European Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 14: 147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dollard SC, et al. National prevalence estimates for cytomegalovirus IgM and IgG avidity and association between high IgM antibody titer and low IgG avidity. Clinical Vaccine Immunology 2011; 18: 1895–1899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang D, et al. Quantitative analysis of neutralizing antibody response to human cytomegalovirus in natural infection. Vaccine 2011; 29: 9075–9080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamamoto AY, et al. Human cytomegalovirus reinfection is associated with intrauterine transmission in a highly cytomegalovirus-immune maternal population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010; 202: 297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Souza MA, et al. Seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus antibodies in blood donors in southern, Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2010; 43: 359–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pereira MJBR, et al. Breastfedding indicators in the municipality of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia 2004; 7: 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yamamoto AY, Figueiredo LT, Mussi-Pinhata MM. Perinatal cytomegalovirus infection: commonly occurring but rarely diagnosed. Jornal de Pediatria 1999; 75: 126–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Borges AL, Latorre Mdo R, Schor N. Factors associated with sexual debut among adolescents enrolled in a family health unit in East Side Sao Paulo, Brazil. Caderno de Saude Publica 2007; 23: 1583–1594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aksakal FN, et al. Rubella seroprevalence among women of childbearing age residing in a rural region: is there a need for rubella vaccination in Turkey? Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 2007; 60: 157–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mehta SK, et al. Reactivation and shedding of cytomegalovirus in astronauts during spaceflight. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2000; 182: 1761–1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stowe RP, et al. Chronic herpesvirus reactivation occurs in aging. Experimental Gerontology 2007; 42: 563–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yamamoto AY, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection as a cause of sensorineural hearing loss in a highly immune population. Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal 2011; 30: 1043–1046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Staras SA, et al. Seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in the United States, 1988–1994. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2006; 43: 1143–1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Seale H, et al. National serosurvey of cytomegalovirus in Australia. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 2006; 13: 1181–1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bate SL, Dollard SC, Cannon MJ. Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence in the United States: the national health and nutrition examination surveys, 1988–2004. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2010; 50: 1439–1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sung H, Schleiss MR. Update on the current status of cytomegalovirus vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines 2010; 9: 1303–1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES