Objective
As recently reported, elevated fasting glucose plasma level constitutes a risk factor for 30-day total mortality in acutely decompensated chronic heart failure (CHF). Aim of this study was to evaluate the 30-day mortality risk in decompensated CHF patients by fasting glucose plasma level and some repolarization ECG markers.
Method
A total of 164 decompensated CHF patients (M/F: 94/71; mean age, 83 ± 10 years) were studied; Tend (Te), QT interval (QT) and 5 min of ECG recordings were obtained, studying mean, SD and normalized index of the abovementioned ECG intervals. These repolarization variables and fasting glucose were analyzed to assess the 30-day mortality risk among these patients.
Results
Thirty-day mortality rate was 21%, deceased subjects showed a significant increase in N terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (P < 0.001), higher sensitivity cardiac troponin, fasting glucose, creatinine clearance, QTSD, QTVN, Te mean, TeSD and TeVN than the survivals. Multivariable regression analysis reported that fasting glucose (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–2.10; P < 0.01), Te mean (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.05; P < 0.01) and QTSD (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.36; P < 0.05) were significantly related to higher mortality risk, whereas only fasting glucose (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–3.02; P < 0.05) and Te mean (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.11; P < 0.01) were associated to cardiovascular mortality.
Conclusion
Data suggest that two simple, inexpensive, noninvasive markers, as fasting glucose and Te, were capable to stratify the short-term total and cardiovascular mortality risk in acutely decompensated CHF.
Keywords: acutely decompensated heart failure, diabetes, ECG markers, Tpeak–Tend
Introduction
As widely known, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently causes macrovascular and microvascular pathologic changes and, thereby, it increases the risks for the development of myocardial infarction, heart failure (HF), stroke, renal failure and reduced survival. Thus, T2DM often constitutes an important comorbidity in chronic HF (CHF). However, although almost 50 years ago, the Framingham study had already evidenced that the subjects with T2DM showed four- to eight-fold higher risk of CHF [1]; even today, it is a matter of debate whether the hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and the other related metabolic disorders have a causal role in CHF or they are merely an epiphenomenon [2]. On the other hand, it is fairly intuitive that the CHF-related neurohormonal activation and proinflammatory state could trigger the glucose plasma level dysregulation and insulin resistance. In fact, as reported in a recent publication, elevated glycemic variability in acute HF admissions of patients with diabetes predicts short-term mortality. Patients with glucose coefficient of variation of more than 30.0% have an independent more than two-fold higher risk of 6-month death after an acute HF hospitalization [3]. Consequently, in acute decompensated CHF, during sympathetic over-activity, hyperglycemia should also be considered as a marker of decompensation and not only as a pathophysiological complication. Therefore, the aim of our study was to understand if the hyperglycemia and other cardiac damage biomarkers ([N terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin, repolarization ECG repolarization variables, etc.] could be used to stratify the 30-day mortality risk in decompensated CHF subjects. In particular, we recently observed that an increase of Tpeak–Tend interval (Te), obtained during 5-min ECG recoding, was able to stratify the short-period mortality risk in this kind of patients [4–6]. Previously, in a meta-analysis based on patients with different cardiovascular risk profiles [7] and in a large longitudinal epidemiologic study [8], an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, sudden arrhythmic death and total mortality associated with a Te increase were reported.
Methods
Patients and protocol
A total of 171 consecutive patients admitted to the Geriatric department were enrolled, from February 2019 to January 2021, due to decompensated CHF. We defined patients with decompensated or compensated CHF as in European Society of Cardiology guidelines, available at that time [9].
When enrolled, all patients underwent to: clinical history, physical examination, standard ECG, transthoracic echocardiography, 5 min of II lead ECG (MiocardioEvent, Rome, Italy) recording, a venous blood sample for NT-proBNP dosage, obtained by Alere Triage Analyzer (Alere, San Diego, California, USA) and other routine serum variables, and, finally, an arterial blood sample for gas analysis. We used the Cockcroft–Gault formula to assess the creatinine clearance.
The patients provided written informed consent for the use of their records for research purpose, and the study was in accordance with good clinical practice and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of clinical research involving human patients. The study underwent Ethical Committee of Policlinico Umberto I approbation. Clinical trial was registered with the following ID: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04127162.
Offline data analysis
We recorded 5 min of II lead ECG (Miocardio Event, Rome, Italy), and the signals were acquired, digitalized at a sampling frequency of 500 Hz, and wirelessly transmitted to a cloud platform for the data storage via mobile phone [4–6]. Subsequently, all digitized signal recordings were downloaded by the cloud platform and automatically analyzed, and checked by a single physician blinded to subjects’ circumstances. Therefore, we measured the following intervals from the respective time series in ECG recordings: RR, QT and Te; QT was obtained by measuring the interval from the onset of the Q-wave to the T-wave end; Te was obtained from T peak to end of T-wave. To identify the repolarization intervals, we used a software originally proposed by Berger et al. [10] and validated in other subsequent studies [11–13].
We, therefore, calculated mean (QT mean and Te mean), variance and SD (QTSD and TeSD) values for each of these repolarization phase intervals, and finally, we calculated the variance normalized for mean of QT (QTVN) and Te (TeVN) [4,14,15].
QTVN = QT variance/(QT mean)2
TeVI = Te variance/(Te mean)2
Software for data analysis was designed and produced by our research group with the LabView program (National Instruments, Austin, Texas, USA).
Statistical analysis
All variables with normal distribution were expressed as means ± SD, whereas nonnormally distributed variables as median and interquartile range. Categorical variables were analyzed with the χ2 test. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to compare data for the normally distributed variables; on the contrary, Mann–Whitney test was used to compare nonnormally distributed variables (as evaluated by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). Uni- and multivariable forward (A. Wald) Cox proportion-hazard regression analysis were used to determine the association between different repolarization continue variables (covariates) and total and cardiovascular 30-day mortality. We used the following covariates for the prognostic model: age, BMI, SBP, DBP, heart rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FIO2 ratio), the alveolar-capillary oxygen partial pressure gradient (A-aDO2), NT-proBNP, high sensitivity cardiac Troponin T (troponin), C-reactive protein, serum potassium, calcium and fasting glucose, creatinine clearance, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, QT mean, Te mean, QTSD, TeSD, QTVN and TeVN.
We used Kaplan–Maier to plot survival curve with three dichotomized variables individually or in combination: subjects with fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/l, subjects with HBA1c ≥6.5% and, finally, subjects with Te ≥ 116 ms. This last cutoff was used according to previous studies [6,8]. Kaplan–Maier survival curves were compared with log-rank test. P-values of less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data were evaluated by use of the database SPSS-PC+ (SPSS-PC+ Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Results
Starting from 170 eligible study subjects, six were not included, because the quality of ECG was suboptimal for repolarization analysis (absence or flat T-wave). Then, we conducted the study on a total of 164 acutely decompensated CHF patients (Table 1). During the 30-day follow-up, 26 patients died (overall mortality rate: 16%): 15 (9%) died for bronchopneumonia and respiratory failure, 9 (5%) for terminal HF, one (0.6%) for fatal myocardial infarction and one (0.6%) for sudden cardiac death (sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) (overall cardiovascular mortality rate: 7%).
Table 1.
General characteristics of the study subjects
| Patients’ characteristics | All | Deceased subjects | Survivors | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 164 | N = 26 | N = 138 | ||
| Age, years | 83 ± 10 | 87 ± 10 | 81 ± 9 | 0.011 |
| M/F, n | 90/74 | 13/13 | 77/61 | 0.586 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26 ± 5 | 26.1 ± 6.8 | 26.0 ± 4.5 | 0.881 |
| SBP, mmHg | 123 ± 19 | 116 ± 16 | 127 ± 16 | 0.008 |
| DBP, mmHg | 69 ± 11 | 65 ± 9 | 70 ± 11 | 0.037 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction, % | 42 ± 10 | 39 ± 11 | 43 ± 14 | 0.054 |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio, | 328 ± 101 | 287 ± 144 | 336 ± 87 | 0.042 |
| A-aDO2, mmHg | 38 (53) | 74 (208) | 36 (46) | 0.071 |
| NT-proBNP, pg/ml | 2250 (6589) | 10 282 (15271) | 1840 (5831) | <0.001 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/dl) | 3.29 (8.43) | 4.93 (14.3) | 3.14 (7.4) | 0.307 |
| High sensitivity cardiac troponin/ (pg/l) | 38 (50) | 81 (101) | 36 (37) | 0.006 |
| Serum potassium (mmol/l) | 4.08 ± 0.59 | 4.16 ± 0.64 | 4.12 ± 0.56 | 0.727 |
| Serum calcium (mmol/l) | 2.15 ± 0.23 | 2.18 ± 0.19 | 2.16 ± 0.26 | 0.738 |
| Creatinine clearance (ml/m) | 44 (35) | 32 (27) | 45 (32) | 0.005 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/l) | 6.8 ± 2.4 | 7.9 ± 2.6 | 6.6 ± 2.3 | 0.019 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.1 ± 1.4 | 6.3 ± 1.4 | 6.1 ± 1.4 | 0.497 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 3.7 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 0.365 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.11 ± 0.37 | 0.98 ± 0.22 | 1.13 ± 0.38 | 0.190 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.16 ± 1.38 | 1.70 ± 0.58 | 2.23 ± 1.44 | 0.255 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.82 ± 1.30 | 1.71 ± 0.89 | 1.83 ± 1.35 | 0.703 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction | 42 ± 10 | 39 ± 8 | 43 ± 11 | 0.054 |
| CHF with depressed systolic function, n (%) | 101 (62) | 22 (85) | 79 (57) | 0.008 |
| CHF with preserved systolic function, n (%) | 63 (48) | 4 (15) | 59 (43) | 0.008 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 129 (79) | 19 (73) | 110 (80) | 0.449 |
| Hypercholesterolemia, n (%) | 77 (47) | 13 (50) | 64 (46) | 0.734 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 65 (40) | 9 (35) | 56 (41) | 0.568 |
| Renal insufficiency, n (%) | 79 (48) | 13 (50) | 66 (48) | 0.839 |
| Known myocardial ischemia history, n (%) | 58 (35) | 11 (42) | 47 (34) | 0.420 |
| Valve diseases | 37 (23) | 6 (23) | 31 (23) | 0.945 |
| Premature supraventricular complexes, n (%) | 18 (11) | 3 (12) | 15 (11) | 0.920 |
| Premature ventricular complexes, n (%) | 33 (20) | 9 (35) | 24 (17) | 0.044 |
| Permanent atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 51 (31) | 8 (31) | 43 (31) | 0.969 |
| Left bundle branch block, n (%) | 35 (21) | 4 (15) | 31 (23) | 0.419 |
| Right bundle branch block, n (%) | 28 (17) | 8 (31) | 20 (15) | 0.043 |
| Pacemaker-ICD, n (%) | 36 (22) | 4 (15) | 32 (23) | 0.378 |
| β-blockers, n (%) | 106 (65) | 16 (62) | 90 (65) | 0.719 |
| Furosemide, n (%) | 124 (76) | 22 (85) | 102 (74) | 0.244 |
| ACE/Sartans | 69 (42) | 5 (19) | 64 (46) | 0.010 |
| Aldosterone antagonists, n (%) | 20 (12) | 2 (8) | 18 (13) | 0.444 |
| Potassium, n (%) | 8 (5) | 0 (0) | 8 (6) | 0.208 |
| Nitrates, n (%) | 24 (15) | 3 (12) | 21 (15) | 0.626 |
| Ivabradine, n (%) | 5 (3) | 1 (4) | 4 (3) | 0.797 |
| Digoxin, n (%) | 7 (4) | 0 (0) | 7 (5) | 0.241 |
| Statins, n (%) | 49 (30) | 5 (19) | 44 (32) | 0.196 |
| Antiplatelet drugs, n (%) | 67 (41) | 9 (35) | 58 (42) | 0.481 |
| Oral anticoagulants, n (%) | 41 (25) | 6 (23) | 35 (25) | 0.805 |
| Diltiazem or verapamil, n (%) | 6 (4) | 0 (0) | 6 (4) | 0.279 |
| Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, n (%) | 23 (14) | 3 (12) | 20 (15) | 0.691 |
| Propafenone, n (%) | 2 (1) | 0 (0) | 2 (1) | 0.537 |
| Amiodarone, n (%) | 16 (10) | 3 (12) | 13 (9) | 0.738 |
| Ranolazina, n (%) | 6 (4) | 0 (0) | 6 (4) | 0.279 |
| Valsartan/sacubitril, n (%) | 2 (1) | 0 (0) | 2 (1) | 0.537 |
| Insulin, n (%) | 22 (14) | 4 (16) | 18 (14) | 0.801 |
| Metformin, n (%) | 11 (7) | 0 (0) | 11 (8) | 0.136 |
| Other antidiabetic drus, n (%) | 3 (2) | 0 (0) | 3 (2) | 0.448 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, or median (interquartile range), or number of patients (%).
ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; CHF, chronic heart failure.
Bold indicates statistical significance P < 0.05.
Age (P < 0.05), NT-proBNP (P < 0.001), troponin (P < 0.01) and fasting glucose (P < 0.05) were significantly higher in the deceased patients (Table 1). Moreover, SBP (P < 0.01), DBP (P < 0.05), PaO2/FIO2 ratio (P < 0.05) and creatinine clearance (P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the same group of subjects (Table 1).
Survival decompensated CHF patients reported lower levels of repolarization variability markers in comparison to the deceased subjects [QTSD (P < 0.01); QTVN (P < 0.05); TeSD (P < 0.01) and TeVN (P < 0.001)] (Table 2).
Table 2.
Short-period repolarization temporal dispersion variables in study patients
| ECG characteristics | All | Deceased subjects | Survivors | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 164 | N = 26 | N = 138 | ||
| QT mean, ms | 447 ± 76 | 458 ± 84 | 445 ± 74 | 0.434 |
| QTSD, ms2 | 6.6 (5.4) | 8.6 (3.9) | 5.9 (5.2) | 0.006 |
| QTVN | 0.24 (0.32) | 0.33 (0.26) | 0.26 (0.33) | 0.015 |
| Te mean, ms | 107 ± 26 | 119 ± 33 | 104 ± 24 | 0.009 |
| TeSD, ms2 | 7.2 (4.2) | 8.7 (2.9) | 6.8 (4.3) | 0.009 |
| TeVN | 4.2 (5.6) | 6.4 (7.3) | 4.1 (7.3) | 0.210 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, or median (interquartile range), or number of patients (%).
QT, QT interval; QTVN, variance normalized for mean of QT; Te, Tend.
Bold indicates statistical significance P < 0.05
Univariable Cox regression analysis reported a significant relationship between that 30-day total mortality and age (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.12; P < 0.05), SBP (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–0.99; P < 0.01), DBP (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.00; P < 0.05), PaO2/FIO2 ratio (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–1.00; P < 0.05), A-aDO2 (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.00; P < 0.05), NT-proBNP (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.00; P < 0.01), troponin (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.00; P < 0.05), fasting glucose (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–2.10; P < 0.05), QTSD (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.36; P < 0.05), Te mean (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.05; P < 0.01) and TeSD (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.024; P < 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed a positive significant association between 30-day mortality and fasting glucose (P < 0.01), QTSD (P < 0.05) and Te mean (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). In addition, the univariable Cox regression analysis showed the following variables significantly associated to a cardiovascular mortality: SBP (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–0.98; P < 0.01), DBP (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86–0.99; P < 0.05), LVEF (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.88–0.98; P < 0.05), NT-proBNP (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.00; P < 0.01), troponin (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.00; P < 0.01), potassium (hazard ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–7.24; P < 0.05) fasting glucose (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–2.10; P < 0.05), QTSD (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–3.02; P < 0.05), Te mean (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.11; P < 0.01) and TeSD (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.34; P < 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed a positive significant association between 30-day mortality and fasting glucose (P < 0.05) and Te mean (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Hazard ratio for Te mean, QTSD and fasting glucose in respect to total and cardiovascular mortality in multivariable analysis. QT, QT interval; Te, Tend.
The Kaplan–Maier survival curves indicated that the subjects with fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/l (P < 0.05) or Te ≥ 116 ms (P < 0.05) reported a significantly higher total or cardiovascular mortality in comparison to the subjects, respectively, with fasting glucose level < 7 mmol/l or Te < 116 ms (Fig. 2a and b). The double combination with Te ≥ 116 ms and fasting glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l (P < 0.01) or Te ≥ 116 ms and HBA1c ≥ 6.5% (P < 0.05) individuated subjects with higher risk for total or cardiovascular mortality (Fig. 3a and b).
Fig. 2.
(a) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for total mortality by grouping the patients for fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/l, HBA1c ≥ 6.5% and Te mean ≥ 116 ms. (b) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for cardiovascular mortality by grouping the patients for fasting glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l, HBA1c ≥ 6.5% and Te mean ≥ 116 ms. Te, Tend.
Fig. 3.
(a) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for total mortality by grouping the patients with the combination of Te ≥ 116 ms and fasting glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l. (b) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for cardiovascular mortality by grouping the patients with the combination of Te ≥ 116 ms and fasting glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l. Te, Tend.
Discussion
In the present study, we observed an increase of 30-day mortality risk in decompensated CHF patients with higher fasting glucose plasma levels and prolonged Te duration. In particular, the association of these two variables resulted in the best predicative factors capable to identify these critical patients with higher risk of total and cardiovascular mortality. In fact, although age, creatinine clearance, blood pressure and NT-proBNP (Table 1) were significantly different in 30-day deceased CHF subjects, these variables were not able to indicate an increase of total or cardiovascular mortality risk in multivariable regression analysis. For these reasons, we believe that elevated fasting glucose level and an increase of Te mean could be also considered a simple noninvasive marker of short-period mortality in acutely decompensated patients. In previous studies, both fasting glucose [16] and Te mean [4–6] were significantly associated with short-period mortality in this kind of CHF subjects; the novelty of the present study was the evidence that these two studied variables mutually increased their predictive power. Whereas we do not know if these two variables are merely mortality risk markers or if they even have a causal role, however, the link between these two variables should be sought in the combination of frequent diabetes complications and pathophysiological CHF derangement. In fact, it is possible to hypothesize that the abnormal Te duration could be caused by a combination of myocardial diabetic [17] and CHF pathophysiologic alterations (autonomic nervous system imbalance). In particular, as a consequence of T2DM, micro- and macroangiopathies, autonomic neuropathy, myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis are observable, and on the other hand, the typical CHF induced dysregulation as the neurohormonal activation and proinflammatory state [18]. Finally, elevated glucose blood levels could be considered a dynamic marker of the sympathetic hyperactivity [18] and higher levels of sympathetic activity are associated with a higher mortality risk [19].
However, it is well known that diabetes induces an increase of cardiomyocyte action potential duration and QT interval in surface ECG [20,21]. In particular, about 20 years ago, in National Heart and Nutritional Examination Survey III, it was reported an increase of subjects with acquired long QT in T2DM patients [22] and, subsequently, it was published that, in NANES III study, the cardiovascular and total mortality rate were higher in acquired long QT than in normal subjects [22]. Finally, it was reported that in T1DM and T2DM the channels mediating sodium, potassium and calcium currents were altered [23]. All these diabetes-related changes and myocardial CHF substrate contributed together to prolong and disperse the repolarization and its short-period markers (Table 2).
Although the electrophysiologic basis of Te remains controversial [24], some authors believe that the Te is a noninvasive marker of transmural repolarization dispersion [25]. In particular, the II ECG lead recordings, the same used in our study, could represent a marker of apicobasal and interventricular repolarization myocardial dispersion rather than transmural [24]. However, whatever the genesis of this parameter could be, Te remains a powerful predictive marker of total and cardiovascular mortality [4–8] and not a mere marker of sudden cardiac death.
Another important element to consider is that HbA1c was not significantly different between the studied groups, giving to the acute fasting glucose imbalance a stronger significance, suggesting that the modifications that occur in acutely decompensated patients are more important as mortality predictors than the T2DM itself.
Therefore, the 5-min single-lead ECG recording, evaluating the markers of left ventricular repolarization, which results altered in diabetic population, added an extra independent prediction to the outcome of this category of patients suffering from HF. This element is of particular interest considering that the evaluation of these ECG parameters can take place remotely and can be consulted by any operator connected with a simple device (e.g. smartphone), providing the proofs of the clinical severity and the possibility to remotely correct the therapy.
In conclusion, our data seem to indicate that two simple, routine, noninvasive, inexpensive, easily repeatable parameters, as fasting glucose and Te mean, are able to improve the stratification for death risk in acute decompensate CHF patients.
Limitations
An actual limitation of the study is the absence of patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. The sample was, in fact, studied before the recent indications provided by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on the use in class I evidence A of these drugs in subjects with HF and diabetes [26]. Further enrollment will help fill this gap. Moreover, an interventional study could definitively assess the power and utility of these evidences.
Acknowledgements
Part of the same database analyzed in this paper has been already studied in two previous published papers, from different point of view [5,6].
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04127162.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol 1974;34:29–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nielsen R, Nørrelund H, Kampmann U, Bøtker HE, Møller N, Wiggers H. Effect of acute hyperglycemia on left ventricular contractile function in diabetic patients with and without heart failure: two randomized cross-over studies. PLoS One 2013; 8:e53247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cunha FM, Cidade-Rodrigues C, Elias C, Oliveira D, Bettencourt P, Lourenço P. Glucose variability predicts 6-month mortality in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16:2121–2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Bertani G, Lospinuso I, Sabatino T, Zaccagnini G, et al. Short-period temporal repolarization dispersion in subjects with atrial fibrillation and decompensated heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2021; 44:327–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Mariani MV, Di Iorio C, Fabietti M, Mastropietri F, et al. Hospital mortality in decompensated heart failure. A pilot study. J Electrocardiol 2020; 61:147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Bertani G, Lospinuso I, Mastropietri F, Fabietti M, et al. Short-period temporal dispersion repolarization markers predict 30-days mortality in decompensated heart failure. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tse G, Gong M, Wong WT, Georgopoulos S, Letsas KP, Vassiliou VS, et al. The T peak - T end interval as an electrocardiographic risk marker of arrhythmic and mortality outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm 2017; 14:1131–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bachmann TN, Skov MW, Rasmussen PV, Graff C, Pietersen A, Lind B, et al. Electrocardiographic Tpeak-Tend interval and risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: results from the Copenhagen ECG study. Heart Rhythm 2016;13:915–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18:891–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Berger RD, Kasper EK, Baughman KL, Marban E, Calkins H, Tomaselli GF. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability: novel evidence for repolarization lability in ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1997; 96:1557–1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Pascucci M, Pappadà MA, D’Alessandro G, Rossi P, et al. Influence of aging and chronic heart failure on temporal dispersion of myocardial repolarization. Clin Interv Aging 2013; 8:293–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Fabietti M, Parrotta I, Mastropietri F, Di Iorio C, et al. Arrhythmic risk in elderly patients candidates to transcatheter aortic valve replacement: predictive role of repolarization temporal dispersion. Front Physiol 2019; 10:991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Pofi R, D’Alessandro G, Minnetti M, Isidori AM, et al. Changes in left ventricular repolarization after short-term testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal males. J Endocrinol Invest 2019; 42:1051–1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baumert M, Porta A, Vos MA, Malik M, Couderc JP, Laguna P, et al. QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association jointly with the ESC Working Group on Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology. Europace 2016; 18:925–944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, D’Alessandro G, Pascucci M, Rossi P, Han S, et al. Myocardial repolarization dispersion and autonomic nerve activity in a canine experimental acute myocardial infarction model. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11:110–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Lassus J, Meas T, Mueller C, Maggioni A, et al.; GREAT Network. Association between elevated blood glucose and outcome in acute heart failure: results from an international observational cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:820–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Low Wang CC, Hess CN, Hiatt WR, Goldfine AB. Clinical update: cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus - mechanisms, management, and clinical considerations. Circulation 2016; 133:2459–2502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kattel S, Kasai T, Matsumoto H, Yatsu S, Murata A, Kato T, et al. Association between elevated blood glucose level on admission and long-term mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. J Cardiol 2017;69:619–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang DY, Anderson AS. The sympathetic nervous system and heart failure. Cardiol Clin 2014; 32:33–45, vii. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dubó S, Gallegos D, Cabrera L, Sobrevia L, Zúñiga L, González M. Cardiovascular action of insulin in health and disease: endothelial L-arginine transport and cardiac voltage-dependent potassium channels. Front Physiol 2016; 7:74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Piccirillo G, Magrì D, Naso C, di Carlo S, MoisE A, De Laurentis T, et al. Factors influencing heart rate variability power spectral analysis during controlled breathing in patients with chronic heart failure or hypertension and in healthy normotensive subjects. Clin Sci (Lond) 2004; 107:183–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brown DW, Giles WH, Greenlund KJ, Valdez R, Croft JB. Impaired fasting glucose, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk factors are associated with prolonged QTc duration. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Cardiovasc Risk 2001; 8:227–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ozturk N, Uslu S, Ozdemir S. Diabetes-induced changes in cardiac voltage-gated ion channels. World J Diabetes 2021; 12:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Malik M, Huikuri HV, Lombardi F, Schmidt G, Verrier RL, Zabel M; e-Rhythm Group of EHRA. Is the Tpeak-Tend interval as a measure of repolarization heterogeneity dead or just seriously wounded? Heart Rhythm 2019;16:952–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Antzelevitch C. Tpeak-tend interval as a marker of arrhythmic risk in early repolarization syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019;30:2106–2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:3599–3726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]