Abstract
The fungus Fusarium oxysporum produced a d-amino acid oxidase (EC 1.4.3.3) in a medium containing glucose as the carbon and energy source and ammonium sulfate as the nitrogen source. The specific d-amino acid oxidase activity was increased up to 12.5-fold with various d-amino acids or their corresponding derivatives as inducers. The best inducers were d-alanine (2.7 μkat/g of dry biomass) and d-3-aminobutyric acid (2.6 μkat/g of dry biomass). The addition of zinc ions was necessary to permit the induction of peroxisomal d-amino acid oxidase. Bioreactor cultivations were performed on a 50-liter scale, yielding a volumetric d-amino acid oxidase activity of 17 μkat liter−1 with d-alanine as an inducer. Under oxygen limitation, the volumetric activity was increased threefold to 54 μkat liter−1 (3,240 U liter−1).
d-Amino acid oxidases (d-AO) (EC 1.4.3.3) catalyze the enantioselective oxidation of a broad variety of d-amino acids to their corresponding α-amino acids, which spontaneously hydrolyze to α-keto acids and ammonium. These enzymes are useful in several areas of biochemistry and biotechnology (for a review, see reference 8). Most important are the applications in qualitative and quantitative analyses in either a soluble (12) or immobilized (11, 19) manner, the oxidation of cephalosporin C (4, 24, 27), the enantioselective conversion of d-contaminated l-amino acid solutions (6, 22) or racemic mixtures (15), and the production of keto acids (3, 5).
d-AO have been found in peroxisomes and microsomes of many eucaryotic cells or tissues (16, 28). However, up to now the yeasts Trigonopsis variabilis (13, 17) and Rhodotorula gracilis (23, 25) have seemed to be the only microbial d-AO producers with satisfactory yields of d-AO for commercial purposes. Although the gene of pig kidney d-AO was expressed in Escherichia coli recently (26) and the three-dimensional structure of this enzyme was solved by two groups (20, 21), pig kidney d-AO is not appropriate for biotechnological processes due to its low binding constant for flavin adenine dinucleotide and its operational instability (8).
In a screening process for new microbial d-AO, the fungus Fusarium oxysporum was isolated from a soil sample in Lower Saxony (Germany) (10). It has been deposited at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen, Braunschweig, Germany, as DSM 12646. Its d-AO accepts a broad range of d-amino acids, including cephalosporin C, as substrates (7, 10). The enzyme was purified and characterized (9). In order to find the parameters important for d-AO production, we tested different kinds of inducers, enantiomeric ratios, and inducer concentrations as well as the influence of oxygen supply during cultivation in a bioreactor.
Culture conditions (shaking flasks).
F. oxysporum was cultivated in 500-ml flasks with baffles at 30°C and 100 rpm. The standard medium (120 ml) contained glucose (18 g/liter), K2HPO4 (4 g/liter), (NH4)2SO4 (4 g/liter), yeast extract (4 g/liter), and metal salts (MgSO4·7H2O [1 g/liter], CaCl2·2H2O [0.5 g/liter], H3BO3 [0.1 g/liter], NaMoO4 [0.04 g/liter], ZnSO4·7H2O [0.04 g/liter], CuSO4·7H2O (0.045 g/liter], FeSO4·7H2O [0.025 g/liter]). The pH was set to 7.0 without further adjustment during cultivation.
The induction of d-AO was investigated by adding several d-amino acids and d-amino acid derivatives at concentrations of 5 and 30 mM, depending on whether the particular compound was a substrate for the d-AO reaction (30 mM) or not (5 mM). The d-AO activity of the cells was monitored during cultivation by taking samples periodically (every 3 h) and preparing a crude enzyme solution. For that, cells were harvested by centrifugation, suspended in buffer, and disrupted with a bead mill (13). After centrifugation, the clear supernatant was analyzed. d-AO activity was determined by the peroxidase–o-dianisidine assay (1, 7).
The highest d-AO activities were usually measured at the beginning of the stationary growth phase. The data are summarized in Table 1 (means of two separate cultivations; the maximum deviation was 7%). The best inducers for d-AO activity in F. oxysporum were d-alanine (yield of dry biomass, 12.2 g/liter) and d-3-aminobutyric acid (yield of dry biomass, 10.5 g/liter). Compared to the activity in cells cultivated without any inducer, the specific d-AO activity was increased about 13-fold. Hörner et al. showed that with N-carbamoyl-d-alanine as an inducer instead of d-alanine, the yeast T. variabilis produced up to 4.2-fold more d-AO (13). For F. oxysporum, this inducer was not suitable (Table 1). In general, modification of the carboxy or amino group of d-amino acids resulted in lower specific d-AO activities than unmodified d-amino acids. When we examined just the results obtained with modified amino acids, protection of the carboxy group resulted in higher levels than protection of the amino group. When we examined protein-forming amino acids as inducers for d-AO in F. oxysporum, the best results were obtained with inducers having small hydrophobic groups. The yeast T. variabilis showed a similar correlation between d-AO induction and the character of the d-amino acid residue (13, 18).
TABLE 1.
Compounds tested for induction of d-AO in F. oxysporuma
| Inducer | Inducer concn (mM) | d-AO activity (μkat/g of dry biomass) | Induced activity (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | 0.2 | 0 | |
| d-Alanine | 30 | 2.7 | 100 |
| dl-3-Aminobutyric acid | 10 | 2.6 | 96 |
| d-α-Aminobutyric acid | 30 | 1.8 | 64 |
| dl-Alanine methyl ester | 10 | 1.3 | 44 |
| d-Methionine | 30 | 1.3 | 44 |
| dl-Alanine-glycine | 10 | 1.0 | 32 |
| d-Tyrosine | 30 | 1.0 | 32 |
| d-Histidine | 30 | 0.9 | 28 |
| d-Arginine | 30 | 0.9 | 28 |
| d-Valine | 30 | 0.8 | 24 |
| dl-Alanyl-dl-alanine | 20 | 0.8 | 24 |
| dl-Alanine ethyl ester | 10 | 0.7 | 20 |
| d-Glutamine | 30 | 0.7 | 20 |
| dl-3-Aminoisobutyric acid | 10 | 0.6 | 16 |
| d-Proline | 30 | 0.6 | 16 |
| l-Alanine | 30 | 0.2 | 0 |
Conditions: 120 ml of standard medium (for composition, see the text), 500-ml shaking flask, 30°C, and 100 rpm.
Substances that did not have a significant effect (<15% induced activity) were d-leucine, d-threonine, d-lysine, dl-alaninol, d-tryptophan, d-isoleucine, N-acetyl-d-alanine, dl-2-amino-4-butyrolactone, d-glutamic acid, dl-1,2-diaminopropane, N-acetyl-dl-serine, d-α-amino-ɛ-caprolactam, dl-2-amino-1-methoxypropane, d-cysteine, d-serine, β-alanine, dl-alanine anhydride, N-carbamoyl-d-alanine, dl-1,2-diaminopropane, cephalosporin C, N-acetyl-dl-tryptophan, N-acetyl-dl-valine, and N-carbamoyl-dl-methionine amide.
The dependence of d-AO activity in F. oxysporum on d-alanine as well as d-3-aminobutyric acid concentrations was investigated (range, 0 to 150 mM). With d-alanine, the specific d-AO activity increased continuously with increasing inducer concentration. Thus, the maximum d-AO activity of approximately 4 μkat g of dry biomass−1 was measured with 150 mM d-alanine (Kinducer = 26 mM). With d-3-aminobutyric acid, the maximum d-AO activity (approximately 3 μkat g of dry biomass−1) was obtained at about 25 mM (Kinducer = 2.7 mM).
An interesting finding regarding specific d-AO induction by d-alanine was obtained when various d-alanine/l-alanine ratios were used to supplement the standard medium. The concentration of d-alanine at the beginning of the cultivations was always kept at 30 mM, while the concentration of added l-alanine was varied from 0 to 100 mM. The highest production of d-AO was measured at a d-alanine/l-alanine ratio of 3:1. Without l-alanine and at a 1:1 ratio (racemate), the specific d-AO activities assayed were nearly the same and were about 50% the value obtained at a 3:1 ratio. If the l enantiomer was present in excess relative to the d enantiomer, the production decreased in inverse proportion to the excess l enantiomer. With pure l-alanine, no d-AO induction was recognized (Table 1). However, the increased d-AO production obtained in the presence of d-alanine/l-alanine ratios of >1:1 is surprising and is difficult to explain. For economic reasons, further cultivations were carried out with racemic inducers, as was done by others (13, 25).
As with the yeast T. variabilis (13), there was a significant influence of zinc ions on d-AO induction. Without additional zinc sulfate in the standard medium containing glucose, ammonium sulfate, and d-alanine, no induction of d-AO was detected, although the growth of the suspension culture was as good as with additional zinc sulfate. The zinc ion concentration necessary for d-AO induction was tested in the range of 20 to 420 μM. A zinc sulfate concentration of >70 μM resulted in a constant maximum specific d-AO activity (a concentration of >280 μM caused a decrease in growth).
Bioreactor cultivations.
F. oxysporum was cultivated in a 50-liter bioreactor (Braun-Diesel Biotech, Melsungen, Germany) at 30°C with an air stream of 0.4 volume per volume of liquid per min (v/vm). The stirrer used was a three-stage Rusthon turbine (400 rpm). The standard medium (see above) plus the inducer dl-alanine (80 mM) (Fig. 1) or dl-3-aminobutyric acid (20 mM) was used. Determination of the inducer concentration of the medium was done by capillary gas chromatography (CGC) analysis with a CGC-Chirasil-l-Val column (Chrompack, Frankfurt, Germany) after derivatization of the samples (6).
FIG. 1.
d-AO production by F. oxysporum (DSM 12646) in a 50-liter bioreactor with d-alanine as the d-AO inducer. The standard medium (see text) plus a racemic mixture of alanine (80 mM) was used (30°C; 0.4 v/vm; 400 rpm). t, time.
The data obtained for cultivation with dl-alanine as the inducer are shown in Fig. 1 (means for at least two separate samples; the maximum deviation was 5%). After 13 h of bioreactor cultivation with dl-alanine, glucose was consumed and l-alanine and d-alanine were taken up into the cells to serve as energy sources. l-Alanine was metabolized first, but d-alanine uptake had already started when about 25 mM l-alanine (ca. 60%) was still present. When d-alanine uptake began, the induction of d-AO started and continued until all the d-alanine was consumed. The specific d-AO activity reached its maximum after approximately 16 h and, after 18 h, a volumetric d-AO activity of approximately 18 μkat liter−1 was present (yield of dry biomass, 14.2 g/liter; maximum growth rate, 0.11 h−1). Compared to the results obtained in the shaking-flask experiment (51 μkat liter−1), only 35% of the volumetric activity was reached.
A bioreactor cultivation with dl-3-aminobutyric acid (20 mM) as the inducer was also performed under otherwise identical conditions (data not shown). In this case, the fungus took up the inducer after approximately 6 h, when more than 80% of the glucose was present. As expected, the induction of d-AO started at the same time. After 20 h (yield of dry biomass, 10.5 g/liter; maximum growth rate, 0.11 h−1), the maximum volumetric d-AO activity determined was 15 μkat liter−1, corresponding to 55% the value obtained in the shaking-flask experiment (27.3 μkat/liter−1).
Bioreactor cultivations with limited oxygen supply.
The bioreactor cultivations resulted in lower volumetric activities than did the shaking-flask experiments with the same medium. Therefore, one major difference between the systems, oxygen supply, could have been responsible. The influence of a limited oxygen supply on the induction of d-AO was investigated by repeating the bioreactor cultivation shown in Fig. 1 with dl-alanine (80 mM). The changed parameters for the cultivation were a decrease of the stirrer speed from 400 to 300 rpm and a decrease of the gas flow rate from 0.4 to 0.2 v/vm. After 12 h, the pO2 in the medium was decreased to <10% until the stationary phase was reached, after approximately 18 h. Again, when d-alanine was taken up by the fungus, d-AO induction occurred (after approximately 14 h) and volumetric d-AO activity increased rapidly up to a maximum of 54 μkat liter−1 (after approximately 18 h). At this time, the yield of dry biomass was 14.1 g liter−1. Due to the lower oxygen supply, a lower maximum growth rate of 0.09 h−1 was estimated, compared to that in the previous cultivation (Fig. 1).
The influence of oxygen concentration on d-AO production was significant. Under oxygen limitation conditions, threefold-higher specific d-AO activity was achieved, compared to that achieved in a cultivation without this limitation. Because reoxidation of the d-AO cofactor flavin adenine dinucleotide depends on oxygen concentration, the fungus might compensate for the slower turnover of d-amino acids in the presence of low oxygen content by increasing the total production of d-AO. Thus, the “bottleneck” for growth would be widened.
The volumetric activity of 54 μkat liter−1 gained on a 50-liter scale in a stirring bioreactor under oxygen limitation is one of the highest reported for bioreactor productions of d-AO in the literature. Higher d-AO activity has only been reported for the yeast T. variabilis (77 μkat liter−1) (13). The data reported by Huber et al. (14) and Biopure Corporation (2) indicated about 112 μkat liter−1 (T. variabilis CSB 4095) and about 250 μkat liter−1 (mutant strain of T. variabilis), respectively, but in both cases, the assays were done under conditions significantly different (substrate and oxygen concentrations) from our conditions. Thus, a comparison is not fruitful (7, 8).
The results described here establish that excellent production of d-AO from F. oxysporum is possible by bioreactor cultivation, thus enlarging the arsenal of microbial d-AO available to serve as useful tools in analysis and biotechnology.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany (Fi 655/1-1).
We express our appreciation to William F. Martin for linguistic advice.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bergmeyer H U, Gawehn K, Grassl M. Enzyme als biochemische Reagentien: d-Aminosäure-Oxidase. 1974. p. 460. , 1492, 1850. In H. U. Bergmeyer (ed.), Methoden der enzymatischen Analyse, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Aufl. Band 1. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Biopure Corporation. October 1990. Patent WO 90/12110.
- 3.Brodelius P, Nilsson K, Mosbach K. Production of α-keto acids: immobilized cells of Trigonopsis variabilis containing d-amino acid oxidase. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1981;6:293–308. doi: 10.1007/BF02798280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Conlon H D, Baqal J, Baker K, Shen Y Q, Wong B L, Nolles R, Rausch C W. Two step immobilized enzyme conversion of cephalosporin C to 7-aminocephalosporanic acid. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995;46:510–513. doi: 10.1002/bit.260460603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernández-Lafuente R, Rodriguez V, Guisan I M. The coimmobilization of d-amino acid oxidase and catalase enables the quantitative transformation of d-amino acids (d-phenylalanine) into α-keto acids (phenylpyruvic acid) Enzyme Microb Technol. 1998;23:28–33. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fischer L, Hörner R, Wagner F. Production of l-amino acids by applying d-amino acid oxidases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;750:415–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb19987.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fischer L, Hörner R, Gabler M, Wagner F. Microbial d-amino acid oxidases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996;799:683–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb33274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fischer L. d-Amino acid oxidases in biotechnology. Recent Res Dev Microbiol. 1998;2:295–317. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gabler, M., and L. Fischer. Submitted for publication.
- 10.Gabler, M., M. Hensel, and L. Fischer. Submitted for publication.
- 11.Gemeiner P, Stefuca V, Wetwardova E, Michalkova E, Welward L, Kurillova L, Danielsson B. Direct determination of the cephalosporin transforming activity of immobilized cells with use of an enzyme thermistor. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1993;15:50–56. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(93)90115-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hinkkanen A, Decker K. d-Amino acids. In: Bergmeyer H U, Bergmeyer J, Grassl M, editors. Methods of enzymatic analysis. 3rd ed. VIII. Weinheim, Germany: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH; 1985. pp. 329–340. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hörner R, Wagner F, Fischer L. Induction of the d-amino acid oxidase from Trigonopsis variabilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:2106–2110. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.6.2106-2110.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huber F M, Vicenzi J T, Tietz A J. High yielding culture conditions for the biosynthesis of d-amino acid oxidase by Trigonopsis variabilis. Biotechnol Lett. 1992;14:195–200. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huh J W, Yokoigawa K, Esaki N, Soda K. Total conversion of racemic pipecolic acid into the l-enantiomer by a combination of enantiospecific oxidation with d-amino acid oxidase and reduction with sodium borohydride. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1992;56:2081–2082. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krebs H A. Metabolism of amino acids. III. Deamination of amino acids. Biochem J. 1935;29:1620–1644. doi: 10.1042/bj0291620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kubicek-Pranz E M, Röhr M. d-Amino acid oxidase from the yeast Trigonopsis variabilis. J Appl Biochem. 1985;7:104–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kubicek-Pranz E M, Röhr M. Formation of d-amino acid oxidase in the yeast Trigonopsis variabilis. Can J Microbiol. 1985;31:625–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kulys J, Schmid R D. Bienzyme sensors based on chemically modified electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron. 1991;6:43–48. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mattevi A, Vanoni M A, Todone F, Rizzi M, Teplyakov A, Coda A, Bolognesi M, Curti B. Crystal structure of d-amino acid oxidase: a case of active site mirror-image convergent evolution with flavocytochrome b2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:7496–7501. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mizutani H, Miyahara I, Hirotsu K, Nishina Y, Shiga K, Setoyama C, Miura R. Three-dimensional structure of porcine kidney d-amino acid oxidase at 3.0 Å resolution. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1996;120:14–17. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nakajima N, Conrad D, Sumi H, Suzuki K, Esaki N, Wandrey C, Soda K. Continuous conversion to optically pure l-methionine from d-enantiomer contaminated preparations by an immobilized enzyme membrane reactor. J Ferment Technol. 1990;70:322–325. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perotti M E, Pollegioni L, Pilone M S. Expression of d-amino acid oxidase in Rhodotorula gracilis under induction conditions: a biochemical and cytochemical study. Eur J Cell Biol. 1991;55:104–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pilone M S, Buto S, Pollegioni L. A process for bioconversion of cephalosporin C by Rhodotorula gracilisd-amino acid oxidase. Biotechnol Lett. 1995;17:199–204. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pilone Simonetta M, Verga R, Fretta A, Hanozet G M. Induction of d-amino acid oxidase by d-alanine in Rhodotorula gracilis grown in a defined medium. J Gen Microbiol. 1989;135:593–600. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Setoyama C, Miura R, Nishina Y, Shiga K, Mizutani H, Miyahara I, Hirotsu K. Crystallization of expressed porcine kidney d-amino acid oxidase and preliminary X-ray crystallographic characterization. J Biochem. 1996;119:1114–1117. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Szwajcer Dey E, Flygare S, Mosbach K. Stabilization of d-amino acid oxidase from yeast Trigonopsis variabilis used for production of glutaryl-7-aminocephalosporanic acid from cephalosporin C. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1991;27:239–250. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Takei M, Watanabe T, Suga T. Characterization of peroxisomes in Tetrahymena pyriformis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982;716:31–37. [Google Scholar]

