Abstract
For the practical use of synthetic hydrogels as artificial biological tissues, flexible electronics, and conductive membranes, achieving requirements for specific mechanical properties is one of the most prominent issues. Here, we demonstrate superstrong, superstiff, and conductive alginate hydrogels with densely interconnecting networks implemented via simple reconstructing processes, consisting of anisotropic densification of pre-gel and a subsequent ionic crosslinking with rehydration. The reconstructed hydrogel exhibits broad ranges of exceptional tensile strengths (8–57 MPa) and elastic moduli (94–1,290 MPa) depending on crosslinking ions. This hydrogel can hold sufficient cations (e.g., Li+) within its gel matrix without compromising the mechanical performance and exhibits high ionic conductivity enough to be utilized as a gel electrolyte membrane. Further, this strategy can be applied to prepare mechanically outstanding, ionic-/electrical-conductive hydrogels by incorporating conducting polymer within the hydrogel matrix. Such hydrogels are easily laminated with strong interfacial adhesion by superficial de- and re-crosslinking processes, and the resulting layered hydrogel can act as a stable gel electrolyte membrane for an aqueous supercapacitor.
Subject terms: Gels and hydrogels, Mechanical properties, Polymers
Specific mechanical properties are one of the most important issues for application of synthetic hydrogels as biological tissue, flexible electronics or in conductive membranes. Here, the authors demonstrate that a reconstruction process consisting of anisotropic densification of pre-gel and subsequent ionic crosslinking and rehydration leads to strong, stiff, and conductive alginate hydrogels with densely interconnecting networks.
Introduction
Unlike metals, ceramics, or typical plastics, hydrogels are semi-solid with high water content. Because hydrogels are generally viscoelastic, shapable, and ionically conductive, they can be utilized in various areas, such as artificial biological tissues, soft robots, flexible backbones of bioelectronics, conductive membranes, and solid gel electrolytes of energy storage devices (e.g., batteries)1–8. For bio-applications, a mechanical match between the hydrogel and surrounding tissues should be considered to minimize deformation, irritation, immune response, and electrical decoupling8–10. However, the strength and stiffness of existing synthetic hydrogels remain significantly lower than those of several biological tissues, in particular, load-bearing connective tissues such as ligaments, tendons, cartilages, and blood vessels with tensile strengths of 0.1–200 MPa and elastic moduli of 0.1–3 GPa11–15. For use as a solid-like gel electrolyte membrane for energy storage devices, the hydrogel should possess superior mechanical performance, particularly tensile strength and elastic modulus. Because this electrolyte membrane acts as a separator between electrodes, strong and stiff hydrogels can maintain its mechanical integrity, when subjected to external impacts and electrode surface reactions that can cause internal short circuits. In addition to the mechanical performance, sufficient ionic conductivity of the electrolyte is also essential for decreasing both the electrolyte resistance and the voltage losses between the electrodes that can cause a low charge-discharge rate16. To date, practical use of the existing hydrogel for such applications has been limited owing to its weak mechanical properties (a few kilopascals’ strengths and moduli)17–19. Therefore, developing hydrogels possessing superior strength, stiffness, and conductivity is a prominent challenge.
Alginate (Alg), a natural polysaccharide polymer, is one of the most widely used polymers for hydrogel fabrication because of good processability with ionic crosslinking, environmental sustainability, biocompatibility (low toxicity), and controllable biodegradability20,21. Despite these advantages, the inferior mechanical properties limit the utilization of Alg hydrogels. Several methods have been proposed for addressing this problem. The mechanical properties of Alg hydrogels are typically improved by increasing the Alg chain length or Alg concentration of a precursor solution22–24. These approaches generally need a highly viscous precursor Alg solution, which causes difficulties in handling and obtaining uniform hydrogels. An additional introduction of strong covalent crosslinking can substantially enhance the stiffness of the Alg hydrogel; however, the hydrogel generally becomes brittle and the strength declines25. Strong and stiff reinforcements such as particles and fibers are also often mixed with the Alg solution to obtain mechanically reinforced Alg hydrogels. Despite that, the mechanical performances of the existing composite hydrogels are not sufficient to afford strengths and elastic moduli of MPa-to-GPa magnitude26–29. Another method, a drawing method, which is a post-process to increase the Alg concentration and crosslinking density of preformed hydrogels, produces a significant mechanical performance enhancement with a form of fiber/thread-like hydrogels30–32. However, they are apparently not suitable for manufacturing large-sized hydrogels with a uniform shape and homogeneous mechanical properties because an additional step, such as weaving, should be included for fabricating large-sized hydrogels.
Herein, we report superstrong, superstiff, and conductive Alg hydrogels implemented via a simple fabrication method (Fig. 1a). The proposed method consists of two steps, anisotropic drying/shrinkage of a pre-gel attached on the flat substrate and additional crosslinking with rehydration in an ionic solution, which is designated as a reconstruction method. The anisotropic drying/shrinkage and subsequent crosslinking/rehydration processes produce densely interconnected Alg networks, significantly enhancing hydrogel strength and stiffness. The simplicity of the process facilitates the production of hydrogels with a large area and thick bulky hydrogels (Fig. 1b, c). The resultant hydrogel possesses variable tensile strengths and elastic moduli in the MPa-to-GPa range, depending on the crosslinking ions (Ca2+, Ba2+, Al3+, or Fe3+ in this study); these features have not been achieved previously in hydrogel systems. Moreover, the sufficient water content of the hydrogel allows high cation dissolution (e.g., Li+) within the gel without compromising the hydrogel mechanical performance. This hydrogel exhibits a high ionic conductivity (2.2 mS/cm) sufficient for its potential use as a solid gel electrolyte membrane for energy storage devices. Furthermore, we can fabricate an ionic-/electrical-conductive hydrogel by mixing an electrically conducting poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythio phene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) in the Alg matrix. Such hydrogels are easily laminated with strong interfacial adhesion through superficial de-crosslinking and re-crosslinking processes. A three-layered hydrogel composed of PEDOT-contained top and bottom layers demonstrates potential usability as a stable gel electrolyte membrane for an aqueous supercapacitor (Fig. 1d).
Results and discussion
Design of hydrogels with densely interconnected Alg networks
To date, two methods have been conventionally used for fabricating Alg hydrogels. The first method involves soaking an Alg solution in a Ca2+ solution, resulting in an externally gelated hydrogel denoted as Alg/Ca (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Due to fast ionic crosslinking in the Ca2+ solution, the Alg solution is immediately agglomerated, forming an uneven Alg/Ca hydrogel; thus, it is difficult to evaluate its mechanical performance. The second method involves mixing an Alg solution with CaSO4 slurry that slowly dissociates Ca2+ ions in the Alg solution, resulting in an internally gelated hydrogel denoted as Ca–Alg (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Although Ca–Alg has more even physical and mechanical properties throughout the gel, its mechanical properties are weak due to a limited amount of CaSO4 used to allow slow and uniform gelation. Because these Alg hydrogels contain much water in the sparse Alg networks with large pores (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d), the strength and stiffness could not reach the MPa-to-GPa range.
To address such problems and fabricate strong, stiff Alg hydrogels, we devised a reconstruction method that densifies the polymer networks and fastens the closed polymer chains. This method is composed of two processes: “anisotropic drying and shrinkage of a pre-gel (anisotropic drying/shrinkage)” and “additional crosslinking with rehydration in an ionic solution (crosslinking/rehydration)” (Fig. 1a). As a concrete example, a Ca–Alg pre-gel with 3 mm thickness, which was first weakly crosslinked by CaSO4, was anisotropically dried and shrunk on a flat substrate almost without a decrease in the width and area (Fig. 2a). The resulting dried film (Ca–Alg/D) of 45 μm thickness was soaked in 100 mM CaCl2 solution to obtain a rehydrated, densely Ca-crosslinked hydrogel (Ca–Alg/D/Ca) with 90 μm thickness. The thicker pre-gel (e.g., 10 mm thickness) could be also used to produce a thicker reconstructed hydrogel (e.g., 300 μm thickness). When the pre-gel is thicker than 10 mm, the x–y plane shrinkage is unavoidable, resulting in an inhomogeneous sample. The thickness of the final Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel was considerably reduced (3% of that of Ca–Alg) because of the highly interconnected network, where the hydrogel exhibited a uniform and compact structure even after lyophilization (Fig. 2b). The dense Ca2+ crosslinking in Alg networks enables the Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel to maintain its shape in pure water, which contrasts with a complete dissociation of limitedly crosslinked Ca–Alg/D (Supplementary Fig. 2). When the Ca–Alg was isotropically dried in the air, rather than anisotropically dried/shrunk on the substrate, a uniform hydrogel could not be obtained (Supplementary Fig. 3).
The subsequent soaking of Ca–Alg/D dried film in CaCl2 solution resulted in homogeneous Ca2+ crosslinking within the densified network (Supplementary Fig. 4). In a typical preparation, a fully crosslinked Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel with 90 μm thickness was obtained in 5 min (Supplementary Fig. 5). The Alg chains and networks were in an amorphous phase regardless of the Ca2+ crosslinking (Supplementary Fig. 6). A simple lamination method is utilized to fabricate a thick bulky Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel using the 90 μm-thick reconstructed hydrogels (Supplementary Fig. 7). For the lamination, the surface of thin Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel (90 μm) was shortly treated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution, and the EDTA-treated hydrogels were stacked under gentle pressure for a few minutes. Because EDTA sequestered Ca2+ from the superficial Alg networks and softened the hydrogel surface, the resulting free Alg chains on the softened surface were gradually re-crosslinked by Ca2+ ions diffused out from the hydrogel insides; the Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogels contained surplus Ca2+ ions because they were obtained after soaked in the CaCl2 solution. As a result, the interface of the adjacent hydrogels bonded quickly by Alg chains re-crosslinking without any glues. The lap-shear test confirmed the strong interfacial adhesion between the Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogels (re-crosslinked interface after the EDTA treatment) (Supplementary Fig. 8a). Despite the mechanical robustness of the reconstructed hydrogel, strong interfacial adhesion caused a rupture of the hydrogel itself first. In addition, the adhesive shear strength was larger than at least 420 kPa, which is superior to that of the exiting hydrogel adhesives and polymeric tissue adhesives33,34, indicating that this lamination allows stable adhesion between the reconstructed hydrogels. Therefore, the resulting bulky hydrogel was mechanically robust and bendable without interfacial detachment and separation (Supplementary Fig. 8b).
The reconstruction method contrasts with direct soaking of the Ca–Alg pre-gel in CaCl2 solution without the anisotropic drying/shrinkage process (Ca–Alg/Ca hydrogel, Fig. 2c). Ca–Alg/Ca possesses a porous structure (Fig. 2d) due to the sparse Alg network with high water content even after soaking in CaCl2. Such structural differences between the Ca–Alg/D/Ca and Ca–Alg/Ca hydrogels are attributed to the difference in the Alg concentration in hydrogel (the weight of Alg per unit volume of hydrogel) (Fig. 2e). Ca–Alg/D/Ca exhibited an incomparably high polymer concentration with highly interconnected compact networks (Fig. 2b).
The importance of pre-gel formation for obtaining a uniform hydrogel was also confirmed. When the Alg solution, rather than the Ca–Alg pre-gel, was anisotropically dried/shrunk and soaked in CaCl2 solution, a wrinkled and rolled-up hydrogel was obtained (Supplementary Fig. 9). The difference between the wrinkled hydrogel obtained from the Alg/D film and the flat hydrogel obtained from the Ca–Alg/D film is attributed to the difference in the drying process. While the interconnected Alg chains (Ca–Alg pre-gel) can hardly be accumulated at the gel/air interface during the water evaporation, the relatively free-movable Alg chains in Alg solution can be easily accumulated at the solution/air interface35,36. The difference in surface hardness between the top (toward the air) and the bottom (toward the substrate) of the dried Alg/D/Ca sample confirmed such a phenomenon (Supplementary Fig. 9c). In contrast to no difference in the dried Ca–Alg/D/Ca surface hardness, there is an approximately 10 % difference in the dried Alg/D/Ca surface hardness.
Enhanced mechanical properties of reconstructed hydrogel
The reconstruction of the polymer network significantly enhanced the hydrogel mechanical performance (Fig. 2f–h). Although the additional Ca-crosslinking (Ca–Alg/Ca) improved the mechanical properties compared to the initial hydrogel (Ca–Alg), both the tensile strength and elastic modulus were still low at approximately a few hundred kilopascals. On the other hand, the tensile strength and elastic modulus of the reconstructed hydrogel (Ca–Alg/D/Ca) were significantly high as the MPa level (tensile strength of 8 MPa and elastic modulus of 94 MPa) (Fig. 2g), indicating the densely crosslinked compact Alg networks contributed to the dramatical enhancement. This strong, stiff, yet flexible Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel withstood two kg-weight (Fig. 2h). Despite its high water content (61 wt%) (Fig. 2i), the tensile strength and elastic modulus of Ca–Alg/D/Ca were 1640- and 7220-fold higher, respectively, than those of the Ca–Alg. The reconstructed hydrogels obtained after the crosslinking/rehydration longer than 30 min in Ca2+ solution possessed similar mechanical properties (Supplementary Fig. 10), which is in line with the result of the homogenous crosslinking completed in 5 min in Ca2+ solution (Supplementary Fig 5).
These mechanically substantial enhancements are attributed to the increased interactions in the densified polymer networks, which were identified by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses. Compared to the peaks observed in Ca–Alg/Ca, the peak broadening of the O–H stretching at 3000–3700 cm−1 and the O–H bending at 1600–1700 cm−1 in Ca–Alg/D/Ca were observed (Fig. 2j and Supplementary Fig. 11); the COO− stretching peaks at 1595 cm−1 was amplified due to the densified polymer networks37–41. Because the number of hydrogen bonding between polymer chains and between polymer chains/water molecules was increased in the densified polymer networks of Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel, the O–H bond was easier to be stretched and bent; therefore, these O–H bond was represented as the increase in the peak intensity of O–H stretching and O–H bending at low wavenumber ranges, 3000–3300 cm−1 and 1625–1635 cm−1, respectively. A clear decrease in freezing and melting points of water in the Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel compared to that of the Ca–Alg/Ca hydrogel supports the above results (Fig. 2k). The water confined in the densified polymer networks of Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel froze at a temperature near −13 °C (left black-line) and the frozen water thawed at a temperature near −6 °C (left yellow-line); these temperatures were lower than those of water in the sparse polymer networks of Ca–Alg/Ca (freezing near −9 °C of right black-line and thawing near −1 °C of right yellow-line).
Additional mechanical enhancement of reconstructed hydrogel via ion exchange
The mechanical properties of the reconstructed hydrogels were further enhanced by using different secondary crosslinking ions, Ba2+, Al3+, or Fe3+ (Fig. 3a). Ba, Al, or Fe-crosslinked reconstructed hydrogels (Ca–Alg/D/Ca–X, X = Ba, Al, or Fe) with a similar water content (~50 wt%) were obtained through ion exchange by soaking Ca–Alg/D/Ca in a BaCl2, AlCl3, or FeCl3 solution, respectively, for one day (Fig. 3b). The swelling ratio of Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe was 93% (Supplementary Fig. 12). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping of the cross-section and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the upper surface of Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe confirmed that secondary crosslinking ions (Fe3+) were homogeneously distributed throughout the hydrogel and completely replaced the pre-existing Ca2+ ions in the hydrogel (Fig. 3c,d). Consequently, the resulting reconstructed hydrogel possessed broad ranges of exceptional tensile strengths (8–57 MPa) and elastic moduli (94–1,290 MPa) (Fig. 3e, f). Crosslinking ions with a stronger binding affinity with Alg, in the order of Ca2+ < Ba2+ < Al3+ < Fe3+, formed stronger Alg networks, which results in higher tensile strength and elastic modulus. Notably, the tensile strength (57 MPa) and elastic modulus (1290 MPa) of Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe reached remarkably high values that have not been previously achieved in a wet polymeric hydrogel material, to the best of our knowledge. The mechanical performance of this hydrogel was also well maintained soaking in pure water (Supplementary Fig. 13).
Because producing thin hydrogels with mechanical stability and consistent performance is important for the practical use of hydrogels as a flexible backbone of bioelectronics and a solid electrolyte membrane, very thin Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe hydrogels with a thickness of 60–170 µm were fabricated and subjected to tensile tests (Fig. 3g). The thin hydrogels still exhibited good mechanical performance. In addition, because this hydrogel is composed of biopolymer alginate (extracted from sea brown algae) and exhibits almost no cytotoxicity (Supplementary Fig. 14), it could be utilized as a bio-friendly material.
Next, we compared the reconstruction method (anisotropic drying/shrinkage of pre-gel attached on the flat substrate and subsequent crosslinking/rehydration) and the conventional drawing method. The drawing process typically includes a drying/shrinkage of material fixed both ends (stretched condition) to align polymer chains along the longitudinal (stress) direction (Supplementary Fig. 15a)30,42. Although the resulting hydrogel exhibited enhanced mechanical properties compared to the initial hydrogel, it did not reach the strength and stiffness of the reconstructed Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel (Supplementary Fig. 15b). The effect of Alg densification and Alg concentration increase in the hydrogel was larger in the reconstruction method than in the drawing method (Supplementary Fig. 15c), which yielded more strengthened and stiffened hydrogel (Ca–Alg/D/Ca). Moreover, after the ion exchange from Ca2+ to Fe3+, while the Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe hydrogel exhibited stably enhanced mechanical performance, the hydrogel obtained from the drawing method was brittle (Supplementary Fig. 15d).
Mechanically robust and conductive hydrogels
We next evaluated the potential usability of superstrong and superstiff Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe hydrogel as a solid gel electrolyte membrane for energy storage devices. Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe was fully soaked in a 1 M Li+ aqueous solution to load Li+ ions within the hydrogel matrix (Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe–Li) (Fig. 4a, b); 1 M is a typical concentration of commercial liquid electrolytes17. For comparison, other biocompatible hydrogels with high mechanical properties, including polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), gelatin, and Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogels, were immersed in the Li+ solution (Fig. 4b). Although the PVA and gelatin hydrogels were fabricated by a method (using the Hofmeister effect/salting-out effect) that was recently suggested for producing hydrogels with superior mechanical properties43,44, these hydrogels were significantly swollen and weakened (PVA) or finally dissolved (gelatin) in the Li+ solution due to the salting-in effect43. The Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel also became swollen and fragile in the Li+ solution because the relatively weaker Ca-crosslinks were dissociated by the excess Li+ ions; the Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel soaked in the Li+ solution (Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Li) was significantly weakened (Supplementary Fig. 16). The wet glass fiber membrane, widely used as a separator for aqueous energy storage devices, was also significantly weak (Supplementary Fig. 17). In contrast, the Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe hydrogel retained its integrity in Li+ solutions without a notable change in its morphology and dimensions (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 18). The significantly densified Alg networks with strong Fe3+-crosslinks were stable, which led to the preservation of the original mechanical performance of Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe in the Li+ solution (Fig. 4c,d). Consequentially, the tensile strength (55 MPa) and elastic modulus (1.2 GPa) of Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe–Li (fully wetted within the Li+ solution) are comparable to or even superior to those of several conventionally used separators made of synthetic polymers5,17,18,45,46.
Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe–Li exhibited a high ionic conductivity of ~2.2 mS cm−1 (Fig. 4d), which is comparable to that of the conventional system consisting of liquid electrolyte and separator (1–4 mS cm−1)17,47. Since Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe contained sufficient water, the free Li+ ions dissolved in the water within the gel were mobile throughout the hydrogel. When the ions were removed from the hydrogel in pure water, the hydrogel exhibited no ionic conductivity (Supplementary Fig. 19), which clearly indicates that the ionic conductivity was attributed to the mobile Li+ ions within the hydrogel. The resultant hydrogel with mechanical robustness and good ionic conductivity worked well as a solid electrolyte membrane even in the bent state (Fig. 4e). Depending on the purpose of the electrolyte membrane, the elastic modulus (0.46 GPa) and ionic conductivity (7.8 mS cm−1) of hydrogel could be additionally controlled by using different Alg-crosslinking ions, Al3+ (Supplementary Fig. 20).
The proposed reconstruction method can be extended for fabricating a mechanically robust, electrically conductive hydrogel. For securing electrical conductivity, we chose the most well-known electrically conducting polymer, PEDOT:PSS, which is also biocompatible like Alg48. Because polyanionic Alg chains can partially replace anionic PSS chains from PEDOT:PSS (binding energy: PEDOT–Alg > PEDOT–PSS)49, the commercial PEDOT:PSS dispersion, a polyelectrolyte complex of cationic PEDOT and anionic PSS, was well dispersed in Alg solution over mixing. Through the reconstructing process, we easily obtained a conductive Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe hydrogel (Fig. 4f). The electrical conductivity of the resulting hydrogel was first identified by comparing Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe-Water (119.4 mS cm−1) and Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe-Water (0.0 mS cm−1) that does not contain Li+ ions (Supplementary Table 1). Meanwhile, the PEDOT-contained hydrogel with Li+ ions (Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe–Li) exhibited high conductivity of 168.4 mS cm−1 that is superior to that of Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe–Li (2.2 mS cm−1), due to the combination of mobile ions and electrically conducting polymer. The elastic modulus of Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe–Li was still high as approximately 1.0 GPa (Fig. 4g).
Aqueous supercapacitor
A supercapacitor cell was prepared to investigate the potential and practical usability of the above-developed electrical- and/or ionic-conductive hydrogels (Fig. 1d). For an electrolyte, we fabricated a three-layered laminated hydrogel composed of two conductivity-improved PEDOT-contained hydrogel layers (Ca–Alg–PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe–Li) and an intermediate ionic-conductive hydrogel layer (Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe–Li) (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 7). The laminated hydrogel of three layers was stable without distinct borders (Fig. 5b). As an electrode, activated carbon, the most commonly used electrode material for supercapacitors, was used.
The supercapacitor electrochemical performance was analyzed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) tests. The device exhibited typical supercapacitor CV curves with symmetrical shapes at scan rates of 1–10 mV s−1 (Fig. 5c). GCD curves were also typical triangular shapes at current densities of 0.2–5 mA cm−1 (Fig. 5d). The supercapacitor composed of single-layer hydrogel electrolyte without PEDOT (Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe–Li) exhibited less capacitance (Supplementary Fig. 21), which implies that the three-layered electrolyte membrane with outer PEDOT-contained layers could be better for energy storage devices. (A detailed study about the supercapacitor performance depending on the difference between the single-layer and three-layered electrolyte membranes will be discussed elsewhere in the near future.) Further, this device exhibited superior electrochemical stability; during over 1000 charge/discharge cycles for 12 days, there was little reduction in capacitance retention (almost 100 % retention) (Fig. 5e). These data represent that the reconstructed hydrogels with high and stable mechanical and conductive performances have the potential for practical application as a solid gel electrolyte membrane.
In summary, we have developed mechanically enhanced hydrogels based on a simple reconstruction method yielding densely interconnected polymer networks. The anisotropic drying/shrinkage densified polymer chains, and the subsequent ionic crosslinking in an ionic solution fixed the compact network and led to rehydration. Such facile processes were available for large-scale production of hydrogels, which are expected to be adaptable for practical manufacturing. The resulting reconstructed hydrogel possessed exceptional tensile strengths and elastic moduli in the broad ranges of 8–57 MPa and 94–1,290 MPa, respectively, depending on the crosslinking ions. Furthermore, through the addition of the conducting polymer PEDOT, the ionic-/electrical-conductive hydrogel was producible. In addition to the mechanical performance, because the hydrogel conductivity was sufficiently high for practical application as solid gel electrolyte membranes5,18,46,50, we demonstrated the practical usability of the hydrogel as the gel electrolyte membrane for a supercapacitor. Based on this report, we expect to further develop mechanically robust functional hydrogels by combining the present concept with existing approaches, for example, adding other polymers51, drawing polymer chains52,53, or embedding inorganic particles6,54.
Methods
Materials
Alginic acid sodium salt from brown algae (Alg, medium viscosity), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA, Mw = 130,000, 99+% hydrolyzed), gelatin from porcine skin (Type A), poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythio phene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS, 1.3 wt% dispersion in H2O, conductive grade, 1 S/cm), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2·2H2O, assay ≥ 99.0%), barium chloride dihydrate (BaCl2·2H2O, assay ≥ 99%), aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCl3·6H2O, assay ≈ 99%), iron chloride (FeCl3, assay ≈ 97%), and lithium sulfate (Li2SO4, assay ≥98.5% (titration)) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O, assay ≥ 98.0%), lithium bromide anhydrous (LiBr, assay ≥ 99.0%), ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4, assay ≥ 99.0%), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, assay ≥ 99.0%) were purchased from Samchun (South Korea). The glass fiber membrane was purchased from Whatman, Cytiva (USA). The activated carbon (surface area = 1900–2200 m2/g) was purchased from Power Carbon Technology (South Korea). The materials were used as received without further purification. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with high glucose and sodium pyruvate was purchased from Gibco. Fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin/streptomycin, and cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) were purchased from Merck (Germany), Lonza (Switzerland), and Dojindo (Japan), respectively.
Preparation of reconstructed hydrogels
Alginic acid sodium salt (Alg) was dissolved in distilled water and mixed with a calcium sulfate slurry (CaSO4) to obtain a 2 wt/vol(%) Alg mixture. The amount of CaSO4 added to the Alg solution was 15 wt% to Alg (Ca2+ ion/Alg-COO– ratio = 15.3 mol%). The mixture was immediately molded and gelated between glass plates with 3 mm thick spacers. This mixture was stored in a 5 °C cooler for 1 day to complete ionic crosslinking. The prepared pre-gel (Ca–Alg) was anisotropically dried/shrunk on a flat dish at 20–25 °C and 20–25% RH for 3 days. The obtained dried sheets (Ca–Alg/D) were soaked in an excess of 100 mM CaCl2 solution for 1 day. Finally, the rehydrated hydrogels were rinsed using distilled water and soaked in an excess of 200 mM CaCl2, BaCl2, AlCl3, or FeCl3 for 1 day (Ca–Alg/D/Ca or Ca–Alg/D/Ca–M). In the case of electrically conductive Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe hydrogel, a mixture solution of Alg and PEDOT:PSS (Alg/PEDOT:PSS wt ratio = 1/0.72) was first prepared, and then fabricated by the same way above-described. For a thick bulky hydrogel, the Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogels were laminated. The surface of Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogels was first treated with a 1 M EDTA solution, and stacked and pressed for re-crosslinking between the adjacent hydrogels. Then, the laminated hydrogel was stored in CaCl2 to completely form and stabilize the interfacial bonding.
Preparation of Li+-loaded hydrogels
The PVA, gelatin, Ca–Alg/D/Ca, Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe, and Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe hydrogels were soaked in a 1 M LiBr aqueous solution for 3 days. The Li+ concentration was referred to typical liquid electrolytes, e.g., 1 M LiTFSI, 1 M LiBF4, or 1 M LiPF6 dissolved in organic solvents17,45,55–57. For mechanically robust PVA and gelatin hydrogels preparation, the salting-out effect was employed43,44. A 5 wt% PVA solution was prepared by dissolving PVA powder in distilled water at 90–95 °C. The PVA solution was poured into Petri dish and frozen at −20 °C. Then, a 1 M (NH4)2SO4 solution was added to the frozen sample at 20–25 °C. After 1 day, a PVA/Freezing/(NH4)2SO4 hydrogel was obtained. For a gelatin hydrogel, a 5 wt% gelatin solution was prepared by dissolving gelatin powder in distilled water at 50 °C. The gelatin solution was poured into Petri dish, stored at 5 °C for 1 day, and then dried at 20–25 °C. Next, a 1 M (NH4)2SO4 solution was added to the dried sample to obtain a gelatin/drying/(NH4)2SO4 hydrogel.
Preparation of aqueous supercapacitor
The three-layered electrolyte (Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe–Li, Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe–Li, and Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca–Fe–Li) was prepared as follows. The Ca–Alg/D/Ca hydrogel surface was treated with 1 M EDTA solution and staked in between the Ca–Alg-PEDOT/D/Ca hydrogels under gentle pressure for re-crosslinking between the adjacent hydrogels. The laminated hydrogel was then soaked in a 200 mM CaCl2 solution for a few hours, followed by ion exchange in a 200 mM FeCl3 solution for a day. The final reconstructed hydrogel was then washed with a 1 M Li2SO4 several times and stored in the Li2SO4 solution to obtain Li-loaded electrolyte membranes. In the electrode case, a slurry composed of activated carbon and PTFE (9:1 ratio) with a little ethanol was blade-casted and dried to obtain an electrode of 300 µm thickness. Then, the wet electrolyte membrane and electrodes were packaged into a 2032 coin cell.
Mechanical tests
Mechanical tests were conducted using a Comtech QC-508E universal testing machine with a load speed of 10 mm/min using a 100 N or 500 N load cell. Rectangular specimens (10 mm width and 40–50 mm length) were prepared for tensile testing (n > 5). The thickness of hydrogels was measured carefully using a microcaliper. The gauge length between the grips was approximately 15 mm.
In vitro cytotoxicity test
For evaluating the cytotoxicity of Ca–Alg/D/Ca–Fe, the viability of L6 myoblast cells with and without the hydrogel was compared. The L6 myoblast cells (1 × 104) were first seeded in a 6-well plate with 1 mL DMEM supplemented with 10 % FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. After 18 h, the hydrogel of 2 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg (n = 4) was added to the Transwell and incubated within the cell-cultured plate at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. Before being added to the Transwell, the hydrogels were washed with pure water and DMEM solution and sterilized under UV light for a few hours. The cell viability was measured using the CCK-8 assay, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Characterization
The water content of the hydrogel was calculated from the weight change before/after drying under vacuum for 2 days. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a JEOL JSM7500F or JSM-6510 instrument. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping was performed using a JEOL JSM7500F instrument. Surface hardness was analyzed using a nanoindenter (Micro Materials NanoTest Vantage Platform). The surface hardness value is an average of random ten points at 1.2 µm depth of each sample. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed under ambient conditions in air using at a scanning speed of 3° min−1 (Bruker Corporation D8 ADVANCE). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250 instrument. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra data were obtained using an ATR (attenuated total reflectance) mode of Bruker IFS-66/S, TENSOR27 spectrometer. The flat hydrogel sample was placed on a ZnSe crystal and analyzed. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was performed using a HITACHI DSC6100 instrument under nitrogen atmosphere. The sample was first fully rinsed with pure water to completely remove unreacted residual ions, and then cooled from room temperature to −60 °C and then heated to 50 °C at a rate of 3 °C min−1. To evaluate the ionic conductivity of hydrogels, the hydrogel was sandwiched between stainless steel electrodes and assembled into a 2032 coin cell. The resistance (R) of the hydrogel was obtained from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (VMP3, BioLogic) at room temperature. The resistance is the intercept on the real axis in the Nyquist plot at high frequencies, and the conductivity (σ) was calculated as σ = t/R · A, where t is the hydrogel thickness and A is the electrode area (1.767 cm2). The conductivity of PEDOT-contained hydrogel was measured through the four-point probe technique. The rectangular PEDOT-contained hydrogel (30 mm in length and 5 mm in width) was directly placed onto wire probes, sealed in Bekktech conductivity cell (BT-115), and its resistance (R) was measured using an impedance analyzer (Zive SP2, Wonatech) under a relative humidity of 100 % and 30 °C. The electrical conductivity was calculated as , where L is the distance between the two electrodes for voltage measurement (0.425 cm), W is the hydrogel width and T is the hydrogel thickness. The electrochemical performance of the supercapacitor was measured by electrochemical workstation (VSP, BioLogic) at room temperature.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (No. 2022R1A2B5B02002097, 2020M3A9D3039720) funded by the Korean government (MSIT), the R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (No. 2020209B10-2222-BA01) provided by the Korea Forest Service (KFS) of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute.
Author contributions
D.J. and J.K. conceived the idea. D.J., J.M.P., M.S.O., T.L.N., H.S., and J.S.K. performed research. D.J., J.M.P., T.L.N., D.K., H.S.P. and J.K. analyzed the results. D.J. and J.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jianyu Li, Mingming Ma and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Competing interests
D.J. and J.K. have patent applications on the method for preparing hydrogels (U.S. Application No. 17/168,490 and Republic of Korea, Application No. 10-2021-0111416). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-30691-z.
References
- 1.Someya T, Bao Z, Malliaras GG. The rise of plastic bioelectronics. Nature. 2016;540:379–385. doi: 10.1038/nature21004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gullbrand SE, et al. Long-term mechanical function and integration of an implanted tissue-engineered intervertebral disc. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018;10:eaau0670. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau0670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang Z, et al. Hydrogel electrolytes for flexible aqueous energy storage devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1804560. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201804560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu Y, et al. Soft and elastic hydrogel-based microelectronics for localized low-voltage neuromodulation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2019;3:58–68. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0335-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rus D, Tolley MT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature. 2015;521:467–475. doi: 10.1038/nature14543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Deng J, et al. Electrical bioadhesive interface for bioelectronics. Nat. Mater. 2020;20:229–236. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00814-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang Z, et al. Improved osmotic energy conversion in heterogeneous membrane boosted by three-dimensional hydrogel interface. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14674-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yuk H, Lu B, Zhao X. Hydrogel bioelectronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:1642–1667. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00595H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Minev IR, et al. Electronic dura mater for long-term multimodal neural interfaces. Science. 2015;347:159–163. doi: 10.1126/science.1260318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang D, et al. Tissue-adaptive materials with independently regulated modulus and transition temperature. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2005314. doi: 10.1002/adma.202005314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Johnson GA, et al. Tensile and viscoelastic properties of human patellar tendon. J. Orthop. Res. 1994;12:796–803. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100120607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smeets K, Slane J, Scheys L, Claes S, Bellemans J. Mechanical analysis of extra-articular knee ligaments. part one: native knee ligaments. Knee. 2017;24:949–956. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smeets K, et al. Mechanical analysis of extra-articular knee ligaments. part two: tendon grafts used for knee ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2017;24:957–964. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ebrahimi AP. Mechanical properties of normal and diseased cerebrovascular system. J. Vasc. Interv. Neurol. 2009;2:155–162. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang L, et al. Micromechanical bending of single collagen fibrils using atomic force microscopy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2007;82A:160–168. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yu C, et al. Accessing the bottleneck in all-solid state batteries, lithium-ion transport over the solid-electrolyte-electrode interface. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1086. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang W, et al. Design principles of functional polymer separators for high-energy, metal-based batteries. Small. 2018;14:1703001. doi: 10.1002/smll.201703001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ye T, Li L, Zhang Y. Recent progress in solid electrolytes for energy storage devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:2000077. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202000077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Song W-J, et al. Recent progress in aqueous based flexible energy storage devices. Energy Storage Mater. 2020;30:260–286. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012;37:106–126. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.No YJ, Castilho M, Ramaswamy Y, Zreiqat H. Role of biomaterials and controlled architecture on tendon/ligament repair and regeneration. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:1904511. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuo CK, Ma PX. Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: Part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. Biomaterials. 2001;22:511–521. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00201-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Drury JL, Dennis RG, Mooney DJ. The tensile properties of alginate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3187–3199. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang L, et al. Cooking-inspired versatile design of an ultrastrong and tough polysaccharide hydrogel through programmed supramolecular interactions. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:1902381. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kong HJ, Wong E, Mooney DJ. Independent control of rigidity and toughness of polymeric hydrogels. Macromolecules. 2003;36:4582–4588. doi: 10.1021/ma034137w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Valentin TM, et al. Alginate-graphene oxide hydrogels with enhanced ionic tunability and chemomechanical stability for light-directed 3D printing. Carbon. 2019;143:447–456. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhuang Y, et al. Alginate/graphene double-network nanocomposite hydrogel beads with low-swelling, enhanced mechanical properties, and enhanced adsorption capacity. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:10885–10892. doi: 10.1039/C6TA02738E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jang J, Lee J, Seol Y-J, Jeong YH, Cho D-W. Improving mechanical properties of alginate hydrogel by reinforcement with ethanol treated polycaprolactone nanofibers. Compos. B. Eng. 2013;45:1216–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Visser J, et al. Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6933. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mredha MTI, et al. A facile method to fabricate anisotropic hydrogels with perfectly aligned hierarchical fibrous structures. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1704937. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao X, Xia Y, Zhang X, Lin X, Wang L. Design of mechanically strong and tough alginate hydrogels based on a soft-brittle transition. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;139:850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Choi S, Kim J. Designed fabrication of super-stiff, anisotropic hybrid hydrogels via linear remodeling of polymer networks and subsequent crosslinking. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2015;3:1479–1483. doi: 10.1039/C4TB01852D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nam S, Mooney D. Polymeric tissue adhesives. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:11336–11384. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bovone G, Dudaryeva OY, Marco-Dufort B, Tibbitt MW. Engineering hydrogel adhesion for biomedical applications via chemical design of the junction. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021;7:4048–4076. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhou J, Man X, Jiang Y, Doi M. Structure formation in soft-matter solutions induced by solvent evaporation. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1703769. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Okeyoshi K, et al. Drying-induced self-similar assembly of megamolecular polysaccharides through nano and submicron layering. Langmuir. 2017;33:4954–4959. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Furukawa T, et al. Structure, dispersibility, and crystallinity of poly(hydroxybutyrate)/poly(l-lactic acid) blends studied by FT-IR microspectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Macromolecules. 2005;38:6445–6454. doi: 10.1021/ma0504668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cathell MD, Schauer CL. Structurally colored thin films of Ca2+-cross-linked alginate. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:33–41. doi: 10.1021/bm060433f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Papageorgiou SK, et al. Metal-carboxylate interactions in metal-alginate complexes studied with FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 2010;345:469–473. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ji D, Kim J. Bioinspired design and fabrication of polymer composite films consisting of a strong and stiff organic matrix and microsized inorganic platelets. ACS Nano. 2019;13:2773–2785. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b06767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zheng, H., Yang, J. & Han, S. The synthesis and characteristics of sodium alginate/graphene oxide composite films crosslinked with multivalent cations. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.133, 43616 (2016).
- 42.Mredha MTI, et al. Anisotropic tough multilayer hydrogels with programmable orientation. Mater. Horiz. 2019;6:1504–1511. doi: 10.1039/C9MH00320G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.He Q, Huang Y, Wang S. Hofmeister effect-assisted one step fabrication of ductile and strong gelatin hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1705069. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201705069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu S, et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with broad-range tunable mechanical properties via the hofmeister effect. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2007829. doi: 10.1002/adma.202007829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Baskoro F, Wong HQ, Yen H-J. Strategic structural design of a gel polymer electrolyte toward a high efficiency lithium-ion battery. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019;2:3937–3971. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mong AL, et al. Tough and flexible, super ion-conductive electrolyte membranes for lithium-based secondary battery applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31:2008586. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202008586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Luo W, et al. A review of advanced separators for rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources. 2021;509:230372. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lee, S., Hong, Y. & Shim, B. S. Biodegradable PEDOT:PSS/Clay composites for multifunctional green-electronic materials. Adv. Sustainable Syst. 6, 2100056 (2022).
- 49.Babeli I, et al. Conductive, self-healable and reusable poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-based hydrogels for highly sensitive pressure arrays. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020;8:8654–8667. doi: 10.1039/D0TC01947J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lim H-R, et al. Advanced soft materials, sensor integrations, and applications of wearable flexible hybrid electronics in healthcare, energy, and environment. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:1901924. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kim YS, et al. Thermoresponsive actuation enabled by permittivity switching in an electrostatically anisotropic hydrogel. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:1002–1007. doi: 10.1038/nmat4363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lin S, Liu J, Liu X, Zhao X. Muscle-like fatigue-resistant hydrogels by mechanical training. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:10244–10249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903019116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Matsuda T, Kawakami R, Namba R, Nakajima T, Gong JP. Mechanoresponsive self-growing hydrogels inspired by muscle training. Science. 2019;363:504–508. doi: 10.1126/science.aau9533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Choi S, et al. Supertough hybrid hydrogels consisting of a polymer double-network and mesoporous silica microrods for mechanically stimulated on-demand drug delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27:1703826. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201703826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kim S-H, et al. Flexible/shape-versatile, bipolar all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries prepared by multistage printing. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018;11:321–330. doi: 10.1039/C7EE01630A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hyun WJ, et al. High-modulus hexagonal boron nitride nanoplatelet gel electrolytes for solid-state rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2019;13:9664–9672. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jeon YM, Kim S, Lee M, Lee WB, Park JH. Polymer-clay nanocomposite solid-state electrolyte with selective cation transport boosting and retarded lithium dendrite formation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020;10:2003114. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202003114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.