In the original article, there was an error in Figure 10B and its caption on page 13. The initial frame of the hyperspectral video at hand was mistakenly labelled. The correct version of Figure 10B with its new caption appears below.
FIGURE 10.
(A) Representation of the frame-averaged motion-compensated data, frame-averaged data reconstructed after the IDLE, EMSC and OTFP analysis and reconstruction residuals. (B) Two-dimensional scores plot resulting from a PCA decomposition of the (pathlength-corrected) frame-averaged reconstructed data. Archetypal frames are highlighted in light grey and connected by a dashed-dotted grey line. The evolution of the scores from right to left follows the hyperspectral video progression from its beginning to its end. (C) First and (D) second component loadings yielded by the aforementioned PCA decomposition. PC and EV stand for Principal Component and Explained Variance, respectively.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the manuscript in any way.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.