Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy logoLink to International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
. 2022 Jun 1;17(4):636–642. doi: 10.26603/001c.35591

The Effect of Self-Myofascial Release on the Pennation Angle of the Vastus Medialis Oblique and the Vastus Lateralis in Athletic Male Individuals: An Ultrasound Investigation

Queenie Mae Torrente 1, Alban Killingback 2, Philip J Adds 1,✉, Claire Robertson 3
PMCID: PMC9159710  PMID: 35693863

Abstract

Background

Maintenance of patellar stability requires a balance between the vastus medialis oblique (VMO) and the vastus lateralis (VL). The imbalance between these muscles is thought to be implicated in the etiology of patellofemoral pain (PFP). Where there is hypertrophy of the VL in PFP patients, self-myofascial release (SMR) may be utilized for its management. However, there is no current evidence regarding SMR and its effects on VMO and VL architecture. The aim of this study, therefore, was to use ultrasound to gain further understanding of the effects of a program of SMR on the fiber angles of the VMO and VL.

Hypothesis

There will be a significant decrease in the pennation angles of the VMO and VL after seven weeks of SMR using a foam roller.

Study Design

Cohort Study

Methods

Twenty-five young, athletic, male participants were recruited to use a foam roller, along the full length of both anterior thighs, three times weekly, on three separate days, for seven weeks. Ultrasound was used to determine the initial and final VMO and VL pennation angles on both limbs. One eligible participant was chosen as an intra-rater control and did not partake in the SMR regimen.

Results

There was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) decrease in the pennation angles of the VMO and VL after the SMR regime. Mean combined right and left VL angle change was -6.65° (-18% mean change) and the mean combined right and left VMO angle change was -7.65° (-11.5% mean change). A weak negative correlation was found between initial VMO fiber angle and the angle change (Rsquared = -0.21), as well as moderate negative correlation for the VL (Rsquared = -0.51).

Conclusion

A program of SMR on the anterior thighs of young, asymptomatic males resulted in changes to the fiber angles of both the VMO and VL. There was a significant decrease in pennation angle after seven weeks of SMR using a foam roller.

Keywords: Patellofemoral pain, physiotherapy, self-myofascial release, ultrasound, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis oblique

INTRODUCTION

The vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) form part of the quadriceps femoris group in the anterior thigh. A balance between these two muscles is key to maintaining normal tracking of the patella in the trochlear groove during flexion and extension of the knee joint.1,2

The vastus medialis is located in the medial part of the thigh, and, though controversial, is generally agreed to consist of two components: the more proximal vastus medialis longus (VML) and the distal vastus medialis oblique (VMO).3–5 The VMO inserts at the medial border of the patella.

Like the VM, the VL is also considered to comprise two components: the vastus lateralis oblique (VLO) and vastus lateralis longus (VLL)6–8 due to differences in their muscle fiber orientations. The VLO is analogous to the VMO in that it is orientated more horizontally at the patella.6,9 While the VMO has been the subject of much research interest, there is less in the literature regarding the VL. However, studies have been carried out, particularly using electromyography, investigating both the VMO and the VL10–13 and their respective roles in maintaining patellar alignment both in normal individuals, and in patients presenting with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

The etiology of patellofemoral pain is known to be multifactorial14 and may be due to pathology or abnormalities in the regional anatomy,15 regional myofascial restrictions,16 or an imbalance between the contraction of the VMO and the VL, resulting in patellar maltracking.17 The condition is most prevalent in young, athletic individuals, with females being more affected than males.18 Treatment options for PFP include physiotherapy aimed at strengthening the VM, where VMO insufficiency is implicated, stretching exercises targeting the VL in cases of VL hypertrophy, or myofascial release where myofascial restrictions are identified.16 Previous studies have shown that it is possible to manipulate the pennation angle of the VMO and VL, either increasing the fiber angle with targeted exercises19,20 or reducing the angle by stretching,21 which has obvious implications for patellar tracking.

Self-myofascial release (SMR) is a technique to reduce fascial tightening by stretching it. It is commonly performed by using a roller to apply sustained pressure to the muscle. Studies on SMR have found that foam rolling increases joint range of motion (ROM) and reduces delayed onset muscle soreness before and after exercise.22–24 There is, however, a paucity of information in the literature regarding its effect on muscle architecture. Indeed, while acknowledging the effectiveness of SMR for increasing joint range of motion, Cornell & Ebersoll25 recommended the use of ultrasound to further investigate the changes brought about by acute SMR. The aim of this study, therefore, was to explore the effects of SMR by investigating changes in the fiber angles of the VMO and VL following a seven-week program of SMR using a foam roller. Ultrasound is a safe, validated, non-invasive technique that has been used extensively to investigate the architecture of the hamstrings26 and quadriceps.19,27–30

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study received ethical approval from St George’s, University of London Ethics Committee. Participants were recruited from the University sports and athletics teams. Twenty-five young, athletic males volunteered and gave informed consent. A power calculation showed that a minimum group size of twenty-three would be needed to achieve statistical significance. Inclusion criteria were: male, age 18-35, no current knee pathology, no previous knee surgery, and a Tegner activity score ≥4.31 Using a male-only cohort provided a homogeneous sample, removing the confounding factor of sex difference. Males also have less subcutaneous fat,32 improving echogenicity of the muscle underneath.33

The volunteers underwent an initial ultrasound scan of the VMO and VL, then undertook a seven-week program of SMR, and were then re-scanned. One individual was selected at random for the intra-rater reliability study. This individual did not take part in the SMR program, and was scanned by the same operator, using the same ultrasound method, on eight different occasions during the study period.

The subjects lay supine on an examination couch, with a pillow under the ankles for support. The mid-point of the patella was found using Duratool digital calipers (Duratool Corporation, Taichung City, Taiwan) and marked. A steel ruler was placed between the mid-point of the patella and the ASIS, and the femoral axis was then marked on the skin (Fig. 1a). The pennation angles of the VMO and VL were then measured on both lower limbs in turn (Fig. 1b), using a Philips iU22 ultrasound scanner with a L17-5 linear array probe (Fig. 1c). All measurements were taken by the same operator, using the same equipment. Measurements were taken three times, then averaged.

Figure 1. The femoral axis was marked on the skin (a); VMO and VL fibre angles were identified and marked (b), using the ultrasound image (c).

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Following the initial scan, volunteers commenced the seven-week SMR procedure using a 15 cm x 45 cm foam roller (PhysioRoom.Com Limited, Burnley, UK). The foam roller was to be used three times weekly, on three separate days, independent of exercise. The roller was placed under the proximal aspect of the anterior thigh while the subject was in the prone position with elbows on the ground. The contralateral limb was placed on top of the other limb (Fig. 2). Using their elbows, the subject then pushed himself back and forth so that the foam roller moved along the length of the anterior aspect of the thigh, from the top of the thigh to the upper border of the patella. Each motion was to be completed in no more than two seconds. This procedure was performed for one minute, and then repeated on the other thigh. A compliance diary was provided to monitor the subject’s activities.

Figure 2. Roller method: the subject moved himself backwards and forwards on his elbows for one minute on each lower limb.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

On completion of the seven-week SMR program, the ultrasound scans were repeated.

RESULTS

Intra-Rater Reliability Study

The results of the intra-rater reliability study indicate good overall reliability of the measurements (Table 1). There was a substantial difference in the fiber angle of the VMO and the VL. The mean fiber angle of the combined right and left VMO was 63.8°, and the mean fiber angle of the combined right and left VL was 33.8°.

Table 1. Intra-rater reliability study. Mean fiber angle, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variance (CV).

Mean° SD Coefficient of variation
Right VMO angle 64.6 ±2.8 0.043
Left VMO angle 63.0 ±2.7 0.043
Right VL angle 35.3 ±4.3 0.122
Left VL angle 32.3 ±2.5 0.077
Open in a new tab

After seven weeks of SMR, there was a significant decrease of 7.0° (±9.73) and 8.21° (±10.53) in the pennation angles of the right and left VMO, respectively (p<0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2. Mean change, standard deviation (SD) and range of right and left VMO fiber angles following seven-week SMR program.

Mean (°) Mean % change SD Range p-value
Right VMO angle change -7° -10% ±9.72 -20 to 12 p < 0.001
Left VMO angle change -8.22° -13% ±8.22 -24 to 13 p < 0.001
Combined right and left VMO angle change -7.65° -11.5% ±10.16 -24 to 13 p < 0.001
Open in a new tab

After seven weeks of SMR there was a significant decrease of 6.58° (±5.58) and 6.71° (±5.45) in the pennation angles of the right and left VL, respectively (p<0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3. Mean change, standard deviation (SD) and range of right and left VL fiber angles following seven-week SMR program.

Mean (°) Mean % change SD Range p-value
Right VL angle change -6.58 -17% ±5.58 -25 – 3 p < 0.001
Left VL angle change -6.71 -19% ±5.45 -15 – 1 p < 0.001
Combined right and left VL angle change -6.65 -18% ±5.56 -25 – 1 p < 0.001
Open in a new tab

There was a weak and non-significant inverse correlation between mean initial combined left and right VMO fiber angle and VMO fiber angle change after seven weeks of SMR (Rsquared = -0.2104, p=0.15) (Fig. 3). There was a stronger inverse correlation between mean initial combined VL fiber angle and VL fiber angle change (Rsquared = -0.5115, p<0.001) (Fig. 4).

Figure 3. Scatter plot showing the relationship between the combined initial VMO fiber angle vs VMO fiber angle change after seven weeks of SMR.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Figure 4. Scatter plot showing the relationship between the combined initial VL fiber angle vs VL fiber angle change after seven weeks of SMR.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

The average compliance recorded by the participants was 82%, i.e., the SMR was carried out on average 2.46 times per week by each participant.

DISCUSSION

Patellar maltracking due to an imbalance between the VMO and VL is thought to be a contributor to the etiology of PFP.2,15 There is a high prevalence of PFP (also known as ‘runner’s knee’) among young athletic individuals, where the problem may be due to VMO insufficiency or a hypertrophied VL. Where myofascial tightness in the anterior thigh is suspected, SMR may be recommended in order to improve flexibility and increase range of motion of the knee and hip.16

While several studies have shown that SMR improves joint range of motion, vascular endothelial function, flexibility, and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in athletic individuals,22,34,35 there is currently no information in the literature on the effect of SMR on the architecture of the VMO or VL, either in in asymptomatic individuals, or in patients presenting with PFP.

The study reported here has shown that seven weeks of SMR using a foam roller resulted in a statistically significant reduction (p<0.001) in the pennation angles of the VMO and VL in both lower limbs. There was a greater overall percentage change for the VL (-18%) than the VMO (-11.5%), which tends to suggest that the SMR had a greater effect on the architecture of the VL than that of the VMO. This may have been due to the fact that the VL extends further along the length of the anterior thigh than does the VM, and hence was affected more by the SMR, because the subjects were required to roll from the top of the thigh down to the top of the knee.

Although the subjects in this study were all asymptomatic, they were drawn from the demographic at high risk of developing PFP. The architectural changes to the VMO and VL provides clinical evidence that SMR could be effective in myofascial release in young athletic males presenting with PFP. Furthermore, a patient’s progress could be easily monitored in clinic by ultrasound scans using the method described here. However, it should be borne in mind that the subjects in this study were all asymptomatic, and, while the results were statistically significant, the clinical significance of these results is not clear: further work is needed to assess the effects of SMR on muscle architecture in patients presenting with PFP.

Interestingly, there was only a weak negative correlation between the initial VMO fiber angle and the degree of change in VMO fiber angle (Rsquared = -0.21), suggesting that the initial VMO fiber angle is relatively unimportant in the likely outcome of the treatment. This is in contrast with exercises to strengthen the VMO, where a low initial fiber angle has been shown to be predictive of a greater increase in post-exercise fiber angle.31 There was a stronger negative correlation between initial VL fiber angle and change (Rsquared= -0.51), which suggests that, in cases of VL hypertrophy, patients who would benefit most from SMR might be identified in clinic by a preliminary ultrasound scan.

There are some limitations to note in this study. Although volunteers were provided with a compliance diary to encourage participation, there was inevitably some variation in actual compliance. Some volunteers found initial use of the foam roller to be painful, which affected their compliance. Also, as the volunteers all took part in sports activities, some may have performed other quadriceps stretches throughout the seven-week period, which could have affected the fiber angles. Participants of this study all took part in various sports and exercise with differing levels of intensity (basketball, rugby, athletics, and cycling), which could have affected the outcomes. It would be useful to repeat this study on individuals who all participate in the same sport.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that seven weeks of SMR using a foam roller resulted in a statistically significant decrease the pennation angles of the VMO and VL in both limbs. There was, however, a greater percentage decrease in the angle of the VL. There was a moderate negative correlation between initial VL fiber angle and fiber angle change. These findings may provide information to help guide physiotherapy interventions for patients presenting with anterior knee pain.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest to declare. The study was internally funded by St George’s, University of London.

References

  1. The extensor apparatus of the knee joint and its peripheral vasti: anatomic investigation and clinical relevance. Weinstabl R., Scharf W., Firbas W. Mar;1989 Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 11(1):17–22. doi: 10.1007/bf02102239. doi: 10.1007/bf02102239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Current concepts of anatomy and biomechanical of patellar stability. Amis Andrew A. Jun;2007 Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. 15(2):48–56. doi: 10.1097/jsa.0b013e318053eb74. doi: 10.1097/jsa.0b013e318053eb74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Quadriceps function. An anatomical and mechanical study using amputated limbs. Lieb FREDRICK J., Perry JACQUELIN. Dec;1968 The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 50(8):1535–1548. doi: 10.2106/00004623-196850080-00003. doi: 10.2106/00004623-196850080-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith T.O., Nichols R., Harle D., Donell S.T. Clinical Anatomy. 2. Vol. 22. Wiley; Do the vastus medialis obliquus and vastus medialis longus really exist? A systematic review; pp. 183–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vastus medialis: a reappraisal of VMO and VML. Skinner Emily J, Adds Philip J. 2012Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 24(6):475–479. doi: 10.1589/jpts.24.475. doi: 10.1589/jpts.24.475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anatomy of the junction of the vastus lateralis tendon and the patella. Hallisey M J, Doherty N, Bennett W F, Fulkerson J P. Apr;1987 The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 69(4):545–549. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198769040-00011. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198769040-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett William F., Doherty Neville, Hallisey Michael J., Fulkerson John P. Clinical Anatomy. 3. Vol. 6. Wiley; Insertion orientation of terminal vastus lateralis obliquus and vastus medialis obliquus muscle fibers in human knees; pp. 129–134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Contribution to the anatomical study of the oblique portion of the vastus lateralis muscle. Bevilaqua-Grossi D., Monteiro-Pedro V., da Cunha Sousa G., Silva Z., Berzin F. 2004Braz J Morphol Sci. 21:47–52. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vastus medialis oblique: an anatomic and physiologic study. Bose Kamal, Kanagasuntheram R, Osman M B H. Sep;1980 Orthopedics. 3(9):880–883. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19800901-12. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19800901-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. EMG activity of the vastus medialis oblique and the vastus lateralis in their role in patellar alignment. Reynolds L., Levin T.A., Medeiros J.M., Adler N.S., Hallum A. 1983Am J Phys Med. 62:61–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis muscles during functional activities in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Santos E.P., Bessa S.N.F., Lins C.A.A., Marinho A.M.F., Silva K.M.P., Brasileiro J.S. Aug;2008 Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia. 12(4):304–310. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552008000400009. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552008000400009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Delayed onset of electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus relative to vastus lateralis in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cowan Sallie M., Bennell Kim L., Hodges Paul W., Crossley Kay M., McConnell Jenny. Feb;2001 Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 82(2):183–189. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.19022. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.19022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis activity in open and closed kinetic chain exercises in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: an electromyographic study. Tang Simon F.T., Chen Chih-Kuang, Hsu Robert, Chou Shih-Wei, Hong Wei-Hsien, Lew Henry L. Oct;2001 Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 82(10):1441–1445. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.26252. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.26252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: a review of current issues. Thomeé Roland, Augustsson Jesper, Karlsson Jon. 1999Sports Medicine. 28(4):245–262. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199928040-00003. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199928040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS): a systematic review of anatomy and potential risk factors. Waryasz Gregory R, McDermott Ann Y. Jun 26;2008 Dynamic Medicine. 7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1476-5918-7-9. doi: 10.1186/1476-5918-7-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Current concepts and treatment of patellofemoral compressive issues. Mullaney M.J., Fukunaga T. 2016Int J Sports Phys Ther. 11:891–902. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. The effects of quadriceps strengthening on pain, function, and patellofemoral joint contact area in persons with patellofemoral pain. Chiu Joseph K.W., Wong Yiu-Ming, Yung Patrick S.H., Ng Gabriel Y.F. Feb;2012 American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 91(2):98–106. doi: 10.1097/phm.0b013e318228c505. doi: 10.1097/phm.0b013e318228c505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gender differences in the incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Boling M., Padua D., Marshall S., Guskiewicz K., Pyne S., Beutler A. Sep 5;2010 Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 20(5):725–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00996.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00996.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. The effect of exercise on vastus medialis oblique muscle architecture: an ultrasound investigation. Khoshkhoo M., Killingback A., Robertson C.J., Adds P.J. Apr 9;2016 Clinical Anatomy. 29(6):752–758. doi: 10.1002/ca.22710. doi: 10.1002/ca.22710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. The effect of exercise and electrical muscle stimulation on the architecture of the vastus medialis oblique - the ‘Empi’ electrotherapy system. Hilal Z, Robertson C J, Killingback A, Adds P J. Oct 22;2018 Global Journal of Orthopedics Research . 1(1) doi: 10.33552/gjor.2018.01.000503. doi: 10.33552/gjor.2018.01.000503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. The effect of stretching exercises on the fibre angle of the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis oblique: an ultrasound study. Bethel Jordan, Killingback Alban, Robertson Claire, Adds Philip J. 2022Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 34(2):161–166. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.161. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force. Macdonald Graham Z., Penney Michael D.H., Mullaley Michelle E., Cuconato Amanda L., Drake Corey D.J., Behm David G., Button Duane C. Mar;2013 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 27(3):812–821. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31825c2bc1. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31825c2bc1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. The effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recovery, and performance: a systematic review. Cheatham S.W., Kolber M.J., Cain M., Lee M. 2015Int J Sports Phys Ther. 10:827–838. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Is self-myofascial release an effective pre-exercise? a literature review. Schroeder Allison N., Best Thomas M. 2015Current Sports Medicine Reports. 14(3):200–208. doi: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000148. doi: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cornell David J., Ebersole Kyle T. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 5. Vol. 15. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy; Influence of an acute bout of self-myofascial release on knee extension force output and electro-mechanical activation of the quadriceps; pp. 732–743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. The effects of eccentric training on biceps femoris architecture and strength: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gérard Rémy, Gojon Léo, Decleve Philippe, Van Cant Joachim. May 1;2020 Journal of Athletic Training. 55(5):501–514. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-194-19. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-194-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rutherford O. M., Jones D. A. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 5. Vol. 65. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Measurement of fibre pennation using ultrasound in the human quadriceps in vivo; pp. 433–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ultrasound investigation of vastus medialis oblique muscle architecture: an in vivo study. Engelina S., Antonios T., Robertson C.J., Killingback A., Adds P.J. May 5;2014 Clinical Anatomy. 27(7):1076–1084. doi: 10.1002/ca.22413. doi: 10.1002/ca.22413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Using ultrasound to measure the fibre angle of vastus medialis oblique: a cadaveric validation study. Engelina Shendy, Robertson Claire J., Moggridge James, Killingback Alban, Adds Philip. Jan;2014 The Knee. 21(1):107–111. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.001. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. An investigation into the architecture of the vastus medialis oblique muscle in athletic and sedentary individuals: an in vivo ultrasound study. Benjafield A.J., Killingback A., Robertson C.J., Adds P.J. 2015Clinical Anatomy. 28(2):262–268. doi: 10.1002/ca.22457. doi: 10.1002/ca.22457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Tegner YELVERTON, Lysholm JACK. Sep;1985 Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 198:43–49. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Eisner Brian H., Zargooshi Javaad, Berger Aaron D., Cooperberg Matthew R., Doyle Sean M., Sheth Sonali, Stoller Marshall L. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 9. Vol. 32. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Gender differences in subcutaneous and perirenal fat distribution; pp. 879–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Skeletal muscle sonography: a correlative study of echogenicity and morphology. Reimers K, Reimers C D, Wagner S, Paetzke I, Pongratz D E. Feb;1993 Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 12(2):73–77. doi: 10.7863/jum.1993.12.2.73. doi: 10.7863/jum.1993.12.2.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Acute effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on arterial function. Okamoto Takanobu, Masuhara Mitsuhiko, Ikuta Komei. Jan;2014 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 28(1):69–73. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31829480f5. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31829480f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Comparing the effects of self-myofascial release with static stretching on ankle range-of-motion in adolescent athletes. Skarabot J., Beardsley C., Stirn I. 2015Int J Sports Phys Ther. 10:203–212. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy are provided here courtesy of North American Sports Medicine Institute

RESOURCES