Skip to main content
Thoracic Cancer logoLink to Thoracic Cancer
. 2022 Jun 2;13(11):1748. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14468

CORRIGENDUM

PMCID: PMC9161318  PMID: 35652457

In Sun et al. 1 the following error was published on page 1407.

The data result in Abstract, Results section, was erroneous. The correct data result is ‘IBL clear presentation time (23.59 ± 4.47 vs. 1026.80 ± 318.34 s) (p < 0.001)’ instead of ‘IBL clear presentation time (23.6 ± 4.4 vs. 23.6 ± 4.4 s) (p < 0.01)’. The results section should read as below:

Results: An IBL was visible in 98% of patients in the ICGF‐based group, even with low doses of ICG. The ICGF‐based group was significantly associated with a shorter IBL clear presentation time (23.59 ± 4.47 vs. 1026.80 ± 318.34 s) (p < 0.001) and operative time (89.3 ± 31.6 vs. 112.9 ± 33.3 min) (p < 0.01) compared to the MID group. The incidence of postoperative prolonged air leaks was higher in the MID group than in the ICGF‐based group (8/100, 8% vs. 26/98, 26.5%, p = 0.025). There were no significant differences in bleeding volume, chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stays, surgical margin width, and other postoperative complications.

The authors apologize for the error and any inconvenience it may have caused.

REFERENCE

  • 1. Sun Y, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Shao F, Yang R. Feasibility investigation of nearinfrared fluorescence imaging with intravenous indocyanine green method in uniport video‐assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy for identifying the intersegmental boundary line. Thorac Cancer 2021;12:1407–1414. 10.1111/1759-7714.13923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thoracic Cancer are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES