Skip to main content
Systematic Reviews logoLink to Systematic Reviews
. 2022 Jun 3;11:112. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01988-3

Correction: Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis

Areti Angeliki Veroniki 1,2,, Sofia Tsokani 1, Stella Zevgiti 1, Irene Pagkalidou 3, Katerina-Maria Kontouli 1, Pinar Ambarcioglu 4, Nikos Pandis 5, Carole Lunny 6, Adriani Nikolakopoulou 7,8, Theodoros Papakonstantinou 8, Anna Chaimani 9,10, Sharon E Straus 2,11, Brian Hutton 12,13, Andrea C Tricco 2,14, Dimitris Mavridis 1,15, Georgia Salanti 8
PMCID: PMC9164543  PMID: 35658953

Correction: Syst Rev 10, 246 (2021)

10.1186/s13643-021-01780-9

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in Fig. 3. The correct figure is given below.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Plot of the percentage of adequately reporting the 49 modified PRISMA-NMA items overall and according to publication interval 2013–2015 and 2016–2018. PRISMA items are ordered from least to most well reported irrespective publication year. Statistically significant differences are indicated with a bold font. Each cell is coloured according to the reporting using the transformation of three colours: red (0%), yellow (50%), and green (100%)

Reference

  • 1.Veroniki AA, Tsokani S, Zevgiti S, et al. Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2021;10:246. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01780-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Systematic Reviews are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES