Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268344

Disrupting Osr1 expression promoted hepatic steatosis and inflammation induced by high-fat diet in the mouse model

Ernest C Lynch 1, Zhimin Liu 1,¤, Lin Liu 1, Xian Wang 1, Ke K Zhang 1,2, Linglin Xie 1,*
Editor: Catherine Mounier3
PMCID: PMC9165803  PMID: 35657825

Abstract

NAFLD, regarded as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, is the most common form of liver disease in the United States. The Odd-skipped related 1 (Osr1) gene was previously reported to play a critical role in embryonic development and as a cancer repressor gene, however its role in overnutrition induced fatty liver disease has never been explored. Induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) for 10-week, the development and the progression of NAFLD was evaluated in either Osr1 heterozygote (Osr1 group) or wildtype mice (WT group). The Osr1 mice, regardless of sex, exhibited more severe steatosis compared to WT. Upregulation of lipogenesis protein including Srebp1c was detected in the Osr1 group, together with impaired IRS2 expression and overactivated Akt/mTOR signaling. In addition, the Osr1 mice had decreased bile acid synthesis in the liver with depressed hepatic expression of Cyp7a1 and Cyp27a1. Furthermore, there was more macrophage infiltration with enhanced expression of Il-1β and TNF-α in the Osr1 liver, associated with overactivation of JNK and NF-κB signaling. In summary, our study showed that Osr1 plays an important role in regulating the lipid homeostasis and hepatic inflammation, whose disruption contributes to NAFLD progression.

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), widely considered as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, [1] is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the United States, affecting an estimated 64 million adults with a current annual medical cost of about $103 billion [1]. Further, 25% of the global adult population is affected by NAFLD.(2) With the prevalence and severity of obesity increasing at an alarming rate, the prevalence of all classifications of NAFLD is expected to increase [2]. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease encompasses a comprehensive clinical spectrum of conditions, ranging from simple steatosis, to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The more severe circumstances of this spectrum can lead to end-stage liver failure and death.

Insulin resistance resulting in hyperinsulinemia, is the primary pathogenic mechanism in NAFLD [3]. This leads to an overabundance of serum free fatty acids from continuous lipolysis of visceral adipose tissue. These free fatty acids are then translocated to the liver, where they are reassembled into triglycerides, serving as the predominant source of hepatic lipids in NAFLD. Other sources of hepatic triglycerides include de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and dietary fat intake [4]. Steatosis occurs when intrahepatic fat accumulates to 5% of total organ weight. These lipids inundate mitochondrial oxidative abilities, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced, activating the metabolic cascade that promotes NASH from simple steatosis. The accumulation of lipids in hepatic tissue served as the inceptive insult in the development of NAFLD, and originally conceptualized in the “two hit” pathogenesis theory [5] until recently when a more accepted “multiple parallel hit” model was proposed [6]. New consideration is given to environmental factors, genetic and epigenetic influence, and variation in crosstalk between various tissues and organs including adipose tissue, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and the liver to provide a more accurate explanation [6]. A multitude of potential sources of injury have been presented, including mitochondrial ATP dysfunction, systemic hypoxia, dysregulated adipokine production, high carbohydrate diets, depleted mitochondrial glutathione, and paradoxically rapid weight loss among others [710].

The odd-skipped related 1 (Osr1) gene encodes a putative transcription factor, a 266 amino acid protein containing four Cys2His2-type zinc finger domains [11]. The homolog Odd-skipped related 1 (Odd1), first discovered in drosophila, is responsible for modulating several genes required for correct segment formation in developing embryos [12, 13]. In murine models, Osr1 was found to play a profound role in kidney, limb, urogenital, and cranio-facial development [1418]. In addition, Osr1 exerts an anti-proliferative effect, inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in multiple cancer cell lines [15, 19].

To investigate the potential role of Osr1 in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), our lab adopted a mouse model using hepatotoxic and carcinogenic Diethylnitrosamine (DEN) and high-fat diet (HFD) treatment for 8 weeks [20]. We have shown that Osr1 heterozygous mice displayed more severe NASH with higher serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels than the WT mice. The Osr1 heterozygous mice also revealed early signs of liver fibrosis with more hepatic inflammation [20]. With this novel discovery, we hypothesize that Osr1 also plays a protective role in the progression of NAFLD induced by an obesogenic diet. Using the NAFLD model induced by 60% HFD for 10 weeks, liver pathophysiology focusing on hepatic steatosis and inflammation and their associated signaling pathways are examined in the Osr1 heterozygous and wildtype (WT) mice.

Materials and methods

Study design

The Osr1 heterozygote (Osr1+/-) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Strain# 009387, B6.129S1-Osr1tm1Jian/J). Three-week-old Osr1 heterozygote mice and their littermate control mice (C57/BL6) were fed a high fat diet (60% kcal from fat, HF) for 10 weeks (n = 9 for male and n = 5 for female mice). Mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) room set at 22°C ± 2°C, 55% ± 5% humidity, and 12 hour/12 hour circadian rhythm. Food and water were provided ad libitum. The mice were humanely sacrificed by CO2 inhalation for a period spanning over 2 minutes and were subjected to cervical dislocation to ensure death. Mouse experiments were completed according to a protocol reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Texas A&M University, in compliance with the USA Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Diet composition

Diet was purchased from Research Diets, LLC (New Brunswick, NJ) to implement a diet-induced obesity (DIO) model. The HF diet (Cat#D12492) had an energy density of 5.24 kcal/g (60% fat energy, 20% carbohydrate energy, and 20% protein energy). The fat source is composed of 54% lard and 6% soybean oil.

Antibodies

Antibodies against mTOR, phospho-mTOR, IRS2, AKT, phospho-AKT-308, NF-kappaB, phospho-NF-kappaB, JNK, phospho-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185), PPAR-g, F4/80, SREBP, and GAPDH were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (USA).

Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT)

To test glucose tolerance, an IPGTT was performed prior to termination at week 10. Mice were fasted overnight and injected intraperitoneally with a glucose solution in saline the following morning. Glucose solution consisted of 20% D-glucose in water with the administration dose of 2.0 g/kg body weight. Plasma glucose levels (mg/dL) were measured from tail blood by a handheld blood glucose meter (Contour next EZ, Ascensia Diabetes Care US, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA) before (blank) and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after glucose injection. Area under curve (AUC) analysis was used to assess glucose tolerance. Glucose solution was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA).

Serum triglyceride (TG) measurement

Serum triglycerides (TG) were detected using a triglyceride calorimetric assay (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Bile acid synthesis assay

Physiological concentration of total bile acids (TBA) in liver tissue were assessed using a total bile acids assay kit (calorimetric) (Abcam Biotechnology, Cambridge, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For bile acid extraction, 100 mg of liver tissue was homogenized in 95% molecular grade ethanol and incubated overnight in a 60°C water bath. After the sample was centrifuged at 3500 RPM for 10 minutes, the supernatant was carefully collected, transferred to a 2 mL microtube, and stored at -80°C. The tissue pellet was resuspended and vortexed in 80% molecular grade ethanol, followed by an overnight incubation in 60°C water bath. After another centrifugation at 3500 RPM for 10 minutes, the supernatant was combined and returned to -80°C storage. Tissue pellets were again resuspended and vortexed in a 2:1 (v:v) molecular grade chloroform: methanol. Samples were returned to 60°C water bath for overnight incubation. Total supernatant was extracted and combined after samples were centrifuged at 3500 RPM for 10 minutes. 5 μL supernatant for all samples were used to test for total bile acids, using 80% molecular grade ethanol as a blank.

Realtime-PCR (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and the concentration was determined in triplicate using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). Total mRNA (1ug) was amplified and reverse transcribed using ReadyScript®cDNA Synthesis Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and RT-PCR was performed using BioRad SYBR Green Master Mix on a CFX384TM Real-Time System (BIO-RAD, USA) with the CFX Manager 3.1software. Primers used for RT-PCR analysis are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Primer used for RT-PCR analysis.

Gene Forward sequence (5′- 3’) Reverse sequence (5′- 3’)
ACC ATCCAGGCCATGTTGAGACG AGATGTGCTGGGTCATGTGG
Cd36 TGGAGGCATTCTCATGCC-AG TTGCTGCTGTTCTTTGCC-AC
cyp27a1 TTGCCTGGATAGGGCTCATAG GTGGGGCACTAGCCAGATTC
Cyp4a10 CAAAATCCAAGGCCTGAACATCA ATGGAGAAACTCGTGTGAGGATT
Cyp4a12b GAGTGTCCTCTAATGGCTGCTTG CCACTTCAGCACGAAGGTCC
Cyp4a14 ATAGGAACAGCTTGTCTGATGAGG CCCAATGCAGTTCCTTGATCC
Cyp4a31 CCCAAGTGCCTTTCCTCGAT AAACCATACCCTGATCGCCC
Cyp7a1 CTGGGGGATTGCTGTGGT-AG GCACAGCCCAGGTATGGA-AT
Ehhadh TTGGACCATACGGTTAGA-GCC CACTGGCTTCTGGTATCG-CT
Fabp GTGGTCCGCAATGAGTTC-AC GCTTGACGACTGCCTTGA-CT
FAS TGCTTGCTGGCTCACAGTTA GCTTGACGACTGCCTTGA-CT
IL10 GCTCTTACTGACTGGCATGAG CGCAGCTCTAGGAGCATGTG
IL1b GCAACTGTTCCTGAACTCAACT ATCTTTTGGGGTCCGTCAACT
IL4 GGTCTCAACCCCCAGCTAGT GCCGATGATCTCTCTCAAGTGAT
IL6 GCCTTCTTGGGACTGATGCT TGTGACTCCAGCTTATCTCTTGG
plin4 TCTGAACAGACAGCTGGAGA CAGTCCACCCTGGACCATTC
Plin5 GGATACACGCGGGATCTGAG CCACCACTCGATTCACCACA
Ppary TGGTTCAAATATGCCACC-AG CCAAGTGCTGGGATTAAA-GG
SREBP-1c AGCAGTCACCAGCTTCAG-TC GGTCATGTTGGAAACCAC-GC
TNFa ACCCTCACACTCACAAACCA ATAGCAAATCGGCTGACGGT

Statistical analysis

All data was analyzed through statistical analysis. For longitudinal data including body weight, a linear mixed model was used for the analysis of repeated measures. For others, one-way ANOVA were carried out by using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

The Osr1 heterozygous female mouse gained more body weight induced by the HF diet

Compared to the WT group, the Osr1 group was weaned at a similar body weight regardless of sex. There was no significant difference in body weight between WT and Osr1 male heterozygous mice at each experimental week point (Fig 1A). At sacrifice, there was no statistical difference in liver to body weight ratios between WT and Osr1 mice observed in males (Fig 1C). However, female Osr1 mice started to show a heavier body weight at week 6 and the difference in body weight maintained until being sacrificed (Fig 1B). The Osr1 female mice sustained marginally higher liver weights by comparison when it was normalized against total murine body weight (P = 0.05, Fig 1D).

Fig 1. Body weight and glucose tolerance during the experimental period.

Fig 1

(A). Male mice body weight growth log from weaning to week 10 indicated no significant difference between groups. (B). Female Osr1 mice started to gain more body weight at week 6. (C). Male mice organ to body weight ratio exhibited no significant difference between groups. (D). Osr1 heterozygous female mice showed larger liver weights. (E). At week 10, no significant differences were noted in glucose tolerance between male mice groups. (F). Male mice IPGTT area under curve. (G). Week 10 IPGTT indicated no significant difference between female mice groups. (H). Female mice IPGTT area under curve. AUC: Area Under Curve. Data is presented as Mean±SD, N = 5–7; *p<0.05.

Glucose tolerance was measured by performing an IPGTT before termination at week 10. Fasting glucose was not significantly different between groups (Fig 1E and 1G). All mice regardless sex returned to basal level at 120 minutes. Confirmed by AUC measurement, the WT and Osr1 mice in general responded similarly to glucose challenge (Fig 1F and 1H).

Osr1 heterozygous mice exhibit more severe hepatic steatosis induced by the HF diet

Hepatic histology was examined to evaluate if Osr1 downregulation influenced the severity of NAFLD. When compared to the WT group, Osr1 heterozygous mice had significantly more steatosis. WT male mice displayed little or mild microvesicular steatosis, with most lipid deposition observed as minor intracytoplasmic vacuoles. Osr1 mice however showed mild to severe hepatosteatosis, with clustered and ballooning perivenular lipid macrovesicles (Fig 2A). When comparing the total area of steatosis between male mouse groups, Osr1 heterozygous mice presented with statistically greater (p<0.01) lipid accumulation (Fig 2B). Female WT mice exhibited sparsely dispersed lipid microvesicles, and no macrovesicular steatosis to any observable degree (Fig 2C). Hepatocytes maintained centrally located nuclei in WT females. By comparison, Osr1 female mice had a far more severe phenotype of fatty liver. Similar to heterozygous males, Osr1 females displayed profound lipid macrovesicles (Fig 2C). The more severe hepatic steatosis in Osr1 females is confirmed by comparing total area of steatosis with the WT female (p<0.01) (Fig 2D).

Fig 2. Osr1 heterozygous mice exhibit more severe hepatic steatosis induced by the HF diet.

Fig 2

(A). HE staining of male liver tissue. (B). Osr1 heterozygous male mice had significantly larger area of steatosis. (C). HE staining of female liver tissue. (D). Osr1 heterozygous female mice had significantly larger area of steatosis. Scale = 25 μm. Data is presented as Mean±SD, N = 5; *p<0.05.

Osr1 heterozygous mice display hepatic overexpression of key modulators of lipogenesis

Hallmark characteristics of NAFLD phenotype are increased fatty acid concentration and lipogenesis in the liver. Protein expression for SREBP1, PPAR-γ and IRS-2 in the liver was measured by Western Blot analysis. Osr1 males exhibited significantly greater expression of both nuclear SREBP1 and PPAR-γ (p<0.05) (Fig 3A). Unlike male Osr1 mice, only nuclear SREBP1, but not PPAR-γ expression was significantly increased in female Osr1 mice versus the WT group (Fig 3B). These results encouraged exploration into expression of lipogenesis genes including Srebp1, Acc, Ppar-γ, Fas, Cd36, and Fib. Both the male and female Osr1 mice displayed higher expression of Srebp1 and Acc in the liver, compared to WT liver. The male Osr1 mice also presented decreased expression of Cd36 (Fig 3C and 3D). Compared to WT males, both the Osr1 males and females exhibited significantly diminished expression of IRS-2 (Fig 3E, p<0.05).

Fig 3. Osr1 heterozygous mice display hepatic overexpression of key modulators of lipogenesis.

Fig 3

(A). The nuclear SREBP1c and PPAR-γ were significantly increased in male Osr1 mice compared to WT. (B). SREBP1 was significantly enhanced in Osr1 heterozygous female mice. (C). SREBP1 and ACC was significantly increased in Osr1 heterozygous male mice compared to wildtype. CD36 was significantly increased in WT mice. (D). SREBP1 and ACC was significantly increased in Osr1 heterozygous female mice compared to wildtype. (E). Both Osr1+/- male and female mice exhibited significantly impaired IRS-2 expression compared to WT mice. Data is presented as Mean±SD, N = 5; *p<0.05.

Osr1 heterozygous mice experienced decreased bile acid synthesis in the liver

Total bile acid from hepatic tissue was extracted and quantified to assess bile acids synthesis. An observed trend of decreased bile acid synthesis in both Osr1 male and female mice were noticed although the difference was not significant (Fig 4A and 4B). Since bile acid levels do not appear to be sex-dependent, we combined those of the male and female mice and the difference of bile acid between WT and Osr1 groups was reanalyzed. The results showed a significantly decreased total bile acid in Osr1 mice (p<0.05) compared to the WT mice (Fig 4C).

Fig 4. Osr1 heterozygous mice experienced decreased bile acid synthesis in the liver.

Fig 4

(A). Osr1 male mice had a decreased trend of hepatic bile acid compared to WT mice. (B). Osr1 female mice had a decreased trend of hepatic bile acid compared to WT mice. (C). Combined results of Osr1 male and female mice show a decreased trend of hepatic bile acid compared to WT mice. (D) Osr1 heterozygous male mice had significantly decreased expression of Cyp7a1, Cyp27a1, Ehhadh, Cyp4a10 and Cyp4a14 compared to WT male mice. Plin4 and Plin5 were significantly increased in Osr1 male mice. (E). Cyp7a1, Cyp27a1, Ehhadh, and Cyp4a31 were significantly reduced in Osr1 knockdown female mice. Osr1 female mice had significantly increased gene expression of Plin4 and Plin5. Data is presented as Mean±SD, N = 5; *p<0.05.

RT-PCR analysis was performed for bile acid synthesis genes involved in the classic and alternative pathways including Cyp7a1, Cyp27a1, Ehhadh, Cyp4a10, Cyp4a12, Cyp4a14 and Cyp4a31. Osr1 male mice had significantly decreased expression for Cyp7a1, Cyp27a1, Ehhadh, Cyp4a10, and Cyp4a14 (p<0.05) (Fig 4D). Osr1 heterozygous female mice experienced a statistically significant downregulation (p<0.05) of Cyp7a1, Cyp27a1, and Cyp4a31 (Fig 4D).

In addition to bile acid synthesis genes, we assessed two known lipid droplet targeting proteins that regulate accumulation of lipid droplets in response to high lipid oxidative metabolism. Perilipin 4 (Plin4) and perilipin 5 (Plin5) protect lipid droplet storage against lipases and encourage lipid collection. Targeted overexpression of these genes can cause steatosis. In both male and female Osr1 mice, Plin4 and Plin5 were significantly increased compared to WT (p<0.01 for male and p<0.05 for female) (Fig 4E).

Osr1 heterozygous mice displayed overactivation of Akt/mTOR signaling in the liver

Assessing immunoblot results, we detected the activation of Akt/mTOR signaling in both Osr1 males and females. The amount of p-Akt and p-Akt/Akt was upregulated significantly in both the Osr1 males and females (Fig 5A, 5B, 5D and 5E). With respect to mTOR and p-mTOR, both the male and female Osr1 mice displayed enhanced levels of p-mTOR and p-mTOR/mTOR (Fig 5A, 5C, 5D and 5E).

Fig 5. Osr1 heterozygous mice overactivated AKT and mTOR signaling in liver.

Fig 5

(A). Immunoblot of hepatic Akt, p-AKT, mTOR and p-mTOR in male mice. (B) Osr1 heterozygous male mice had elevated p-AKT/AKT compared to WT male mice. (B). Osr1 heterozygous male mice had elevated p-mTOR/mTOR compared to WT male mice. (C). Immunoblot of hepatic Akt, p-AKT, mTOR and p-mTOR in female mice. (D). Osr1 heterozygous female mice had elevated p-AKT/AKT compared to WT female mice. (E). Osr1 heterozygous female mice had elevated p-mTOR/mTOR compared to WT female mice. Data is presented as Mean±SD, N = 5; *p<0.05.

Osr1 heterozygous mice exhibited more liver inflammation in hepatic tissue

We performed an immunofluorescence assay using F4/80 antibody to detect the presence of macrophages in the liver. Both the Osr1 male and female mice had significantly increased infiltration of macrophages compared to the WT group (p<0.05 for male and p<0.01 for female) (Fig 6A–6C). We further assessed inflammatory activity by evaluating the gene expression of Il-1β, Il-4, Il-6, Il-10, and TNF-α. Both the male and female Osr1 mice had increased expression of Il-1β and TNF-α in the liver (Fig 6D and 6E), which coincides with the elevated number of macrophages observed.

Fig 6. Osr1 heterozygous mice exhibited more liver inflammation in hepatic tissue.

Fig 6

(A). F4/80 Immunofluorescence results for macrophages in hepatic tissue. Scale = 100 μm. (B). Male mice F4/80 positive cell quantification. (C). F4/80 positive cell quantification in female mice. (D). Osr1 male mice exhibited significantly upregulated pro-inflammatory Il-1β and TNF-α. (E). Osr1 female mice experienced significant upregulation of inflammokines Il-1β and TNF-α. (F). Osr1male mice exhibited significantly upregulated pNF-κB/NF-κB compared to male WT mice. (G). Osr1 female mice experienced significant upregulation of pNF-κB/NF-κB. (H). pJNK/JNK was significantly increased in Osr1 heterozygous males. (I). Osr1 heterozygous females displayed significant upregulation of pJNK/JNK signaling compared to WT female mice.

JNK and NF-κB signaling pathways are activated by phosphorylation, which is facilitated largely by pro-inflammatory cytokines Il-1β and TNF-α. Osr1 males experienced significantly higher levels of p-NF-κB, NF-κB, as well as p-NF-κB/NF-κB compared to WT males (p<0.05) (Fig 6F). Osr1 females likewise expressed significantly greater levels of p-NF-κB and p-NF-κB/NF-κB (p<0.05), but not NF-κB (Fig 6G). For JNK signaling, both the male and female Osr1 displayed a statistically significant increase of pJNK and pJNK/JNK ratio (p<0.05) (Fig 6H). In female Osr1 mice, there was also a higher level of JNK observed in the liver (p<0.05) (Fig 6I).

Discussion

Previous findings from our lab have explored the role of Osr1 to inhibit hepatic injury caused by HFD and DEN, potentially serving to depress its progression to HCC.(20) We report in this pre-cancer model that Osr1 heterozygote mice exhibited more steatosis. Thus, we hypothesize that disrupting Osr1 expression breaks the lipid homeostasis and induces inflammation in the liver, further promoting the progression of NAFLD. To test this hypothesis, the current study employed a mouse NAFLD model induced by HFD for 10 weeks. Knocking down Osr1 in mice with HFD-induced obesogenic conditions led to advanced hepatic steatosis compared to WT mice, independent of sex. This phenotype is associated with increased lipogenesis, diminished bile acid synthesis, and increased hepatic inflammation. We further identified that activation of several key signaling pathways, including Akt/mTOR signaling, JNK, and NF-κB signaling were associated with disrupted Osr1 expression in the liver. Based on our results, the Osr1 gene appears to play a hepatoprotective role in the progression of NAFLD.

In our study, sex as a biological variance is fully evaluated to determine if the important role of Osr1 on NAFLD progression is sex-dependent. The liver is a sexually dimorphic organ, exhibiting differences in steroid metabolism, number of parenchymal and nonparenchymal cells, and varying interactions between immune and endocrine systems. NAFLD pathogenesis is closely associated with dysmetabolic features [21]. In animal and human studies, the female sex is protected from dysmetabolism [22]. In our study, liver histology did reveal that female mice experienced less severe steatosis than males, regardless different genotypes. However, knocking down Osr1 similarly caused more severe hepatic steatosis than WT mice regardless of male or female sex. Consistently, overall changes in the gene expression and the signaling pathways in Osr1 mice versus the WT mice were not different by sex, although expression change of individual genes or proteins such as the PPARγ was not same. Likely the minor difference is a reflection of the sex variance in lipid metabolism. Nonetheless, our results suggest that the role of Osr1 in lipid metabolism and liver inflammation is not sex-dependent.

Worsened hepatic steatosis is a major pathological change in the Osr1+/- liver. It is noted that the body weight between the Osr1+/- and WT mice was not statistically different upon 10-week HFD. This fact suggests to us that the role of Osr1 in lipid metabolism is not obese related, highlighting an important role of Osr1 in hepatic lipid metabolism in liver. The enhanced expression of lipogenesis genes and associated overactivation of Akt/mTOR signaling indicated dysfunctional lipogenesis and hepatic lipid metabolism. Osr1 knockdown mice exhibited enhanced expression of SREBP1 and ACC, indicative of increased hepatic fatty acid uptake and lipogenesis. Expression levels occurring in these groups coincide with expected results based on severe microvesicular and macrovesicular steatosis. In the liver, PPAR-γ mediates lipid metabolism, specifically targeting genes involved in de novo lipogenesis and free fatty acid import [23]. Akt/mTOR signaling regulates various hepatic, metabolic, and physiological processes including glucose and lipid metabolism [24]. This pathway promotes lipogenesis by positive regulation of lipogenic genes including the SREBP family of transcription factors responsible for fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis [25]. Akt/mTOR signaling was significantly enhanced in Osr1 mice, likely contributing to upregulation of Srebp1. Cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis plays a central role in metabolic health. Bile acid synthesis is a major pathway for hepatic cholesterol catabolism, via Cyp7a1 regulated classic pathway and Cyp27a1 regulated alternative (acidic) pathway [26]. A tightly regulated feedback mechanism is required in maintaining the lipid homeostasis. Dysregulation of this feedback signaling network significantly contributes to pathologies of NAFLD [27, 28]. The Osr1 mice presented lower amounts of bile acid in the liver associated with decreased expression of Cyp7a1 and Cyp27a1, suggesting an important role of Osr1 in bile acid synthesis. It is possible that reduced bile acid synthesis results in a “cholesterol trap” in the liver, which further contributes to the development of cholestasis. To test this hypothesized mechanism, future study will need to focus on the status of hepatic cholesterol homeostasis in the Osr1 heterozygote mice exposed to HFD. Interestingly, it has been reported that disrupting Cyp7a1 expression in the liver could induce hepatic inflammation [29], which is consistent with our observations. Nonetheless, our data suggested that Osr1 plays a role in regulating lipid metabolism in the liver.

Macrophage infiltration and classical activation of proinflammatory macrophages by inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α are powerful indicators of inflammation in hepatic tissue [30]. The two classical signaling pathways associated with hepatic inflammation involve mitogen activated JNK and NF-κB [31]. Increased JNK and NF-κB are the major source of damaging inflammatory cytokines in NASH and apoptosis. These factors are distinguished by the production of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α [32]. In our study, Osr1 mice displayed more macrophage infiltration, higher hepatic expression of Il-1β and Tnfα, together with overactivation of JNK and NF-κB signaling. These data support Osr1 as a critical mediator for liver inflammation in NAFLD progression. To be noted, Osr1 has been found to be strongly expressed in macrophages, whose infiltration into the liver is more profound in Osr1 heterozygous liver [20].

Both the classic “two hit” hypothesis and the “multiple parallel hit” model have highlighted lipotoxicity-induced oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and immunological responses involving macrophages to be the central drivers of hepatic injury in NAFLD/NASH [5, 33, 34]. In the current study, our results could not reveal if increased liver inflammation in the Osr1+/- mice is a cause or a consequence of the steatosis, thus it is unclear if the worsened steatosis or the enhanced hepatic inflammation is the driving force for NAFLD progression. To solve this question, future study needs to identify the direct targets of Osr1 in liver. In addition, mouse models with Osr1 disruption or deletion specifically in hepatocytes or macrophages should be utilized to understand the important role of Osr1 in lipid metabolism and hepatic inflammation during NAFLD progression.

In summary, our study provides evidence that Osr1 plays an important role in regulating the lipid homeostasis and hepatic inflammation, whose disruptions contribute to NAFLD progression.

Supporting information

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The study is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIDDK 1R01DK112368-01); and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, [Hatch] project [1010406]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The following authors’ salary are at least partially supported by NIH: Linglin Xie, Ernest C. Lynch, Ke K. Zhang, and Lin Liu. Linglin Xie’s salary is partially supported by USDA Hatch Project.

References

  • 1.Puri P, Sanyal AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Definitions, risk factors, and workup. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2012;1(4):99–103. doi: 10.1002/cld.81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11–20. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vanni E, Bugianesi E, Kotronen A, De Minicis S, Yki-Jarvinen H, Svegliati-Baroni G. From the metabolic syndrome to NAFLD or vice versa? Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(5):320–30. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Verna EC, Berk PD. Role of fatty acids in the pathogenesis of obesity and fatty liver: impact of bariatric surgery. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28(4):407–26. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1091985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Day CP, James OF. Steatohepatitis: a tale of two "hits"? Gastroenterology. 1998;114(4):842–5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70599-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buzzetti E, Pinzani M, Tsochatzis EA. The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Metabolism. 2016;65(8):1038–48. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Musso G, Gambino R, De Michieli F, Durazzo M, Pagano G, Cassader M. Adiponectin gene polymorphisms modulate acute adiponectin response to dietary fat: Possible pathogenetic role in NASH. Hepatology. 2008;47(4):1167–77. doi: 10.1002/hep.22142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mari M, Colell A, Morales A, Caballero F, Moles A, Fernandez A, et al. Mechanism of mitochondrial glutathione-dependent hepatocellular susceptibility to TNF despite NF-kappaB activation. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1507–20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mari M, Caballero F, Colell A, Morales A, Caballeria J, Fernandez A, et al. Mitochondrial free cholesterol loading sensitizes to TNF- and Fas-mediated steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2006;4(3):185–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cortez-Pinto H, Chatham J, Chacko VP, Arnold C, Rashid A, Diehl AM. Alterations in liver ATP homeostasis in human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot study. JAMA. 1999;282(17):1659–64. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.17.1659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.DiNardo S, O’Farrell PH. Establishment and refinement of segmental pattern in the Drosophila embryo: spatial control of engrailed expression by pair-rule genes. Genes Dev. 1987;1(10):1212–25. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.10.1212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.So PL, Danielian PS. Cloning and expression analysis of a mouse gene related to Drosophila odd-skipped. Mech Dev. 1999;84(1–2):157–60. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00058-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nusslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 1980;287(5785):795–801. doi: 10.1038/287795a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou L, Liu J, Olson P, Zhang K, Wynne J, Xie L. Tbx5 and Osr1 interact to regulate posterior second heart field cell cycle progression for cardiac septation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;85:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen W, Wu K, Zhang H, Fu X, Yao F, Yang A. Odd-skipped related transcription factor 1 (OSR1) suppresses tongue squamous cell carcinoma migration and invasion through inhibiting NF-kappaB pathway. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;839:33–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang Z, Iglesias D, Eliopoulos N, El Kares R, Chu L, Romagnani P, et al. A variant OSR1 allele which disturbs OSR1 mRNA expression in renal progenitor cells is associated with reduction of newborn kidney size and function. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(21):4167–74. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang Q, Lan Y, Cho ES, Maltby KM, Jiang R. Odd-skipped related 1 (Odd 1) is an essential regulator of heart and urogenital development. Dev Biol. 2005;288(2):582–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang KK, Xiang M, Zhou L, Liu J, Curry N, Heine Suner D, et al. Gene network and familial analyses uncover a gene network involving Tbx5/Osr1/Pcsk6 interaction in the second heart field for atrial septation. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(6):1140–51. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang Y, Yuan Y, Liang P, Guo X, Ying Y, Shu XS, et al. OSR1 is a novel epigenetic silenced tumor suppressor regulating invasion and proliferation in renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(18):30008–18. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou Y, Liu Z, Lynch EC, He L, Cheng H, Liu L, et al. Osr1 regulates hepatic inflammation and cell survival in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lab Invest. 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41374-020-00493-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ballestri S, Nascimbeni F, Baldelli E, Marrazzo A, Romagnoli D, Lonardo A. NAFLD as a Sexual Dimorphic Disease: Role of Gender and Reproductive Status in the Development and Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Inherent Cardiovascular Risk. Adv Ther. 2017;34(6):1291–326. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0556-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kurt Z, Barrere-Cain R, LaGuardia J, Mehrabian M, Pan C, Hui ST, et al. Tissue-specific pathways and networks underlying sexual dimorphism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Biol Sex Differ. 2018;9(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13293-018-0205-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pettinelli P, Videla LA. Up-regulation of PPAR-gamma mRNA expression in the liver of obese patients: an additional reinforcing lipogenic mechanism to SREBP-1c induction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1424–30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Caron A, Richard D, Laplante M. The Roles of mTOR Complexes in Lipid Metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2015;35:321–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kwanten WJ, Martinet W, Michielsen PP, Francque SM. Role of autophagy in the pathophysiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a controversial issue. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(23):7325–38. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li T, Chiang JY. Regulation of bile acid and cholesterol metabolism by PPARs. PPAR Res. 2009;2009:501739. doi: 10.1155/2009/501739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thomas H. NAFLD: Blocking ileal bile acid uptake safeguards against NAFLD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(11):623. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jiao N, Baker SS, Chapa-Rodriguez A, Liu W, Nugent CA, Tsompana M, et al. Suppressed hepatic bile acid signalling despite elevated production of primary and secondary bile acids in NAFLD. Gut. 2018;67(10):1881–91. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu H, Pathak P, Boehme S, Chiang JL. Cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase protects the liver from inflammation and fibrosis by maintaining cholesterol homeostasis. J Lipid Res. 2016;57(10):1831–44. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M069807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Braunersreuther V, Viviani GL, Mach F, Montecucco F. Role of cytokines and chemokines in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(8):727–35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i8.727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cai D, Yuan M, Frantz DF, Melendez PA, Hansen L, Lee J, et al. Local and systemic insulin resistance resulting from hepatic activation of IKK-beta and NF-kappaB. Nat Med. 2005;11(2):183–90. doi: 10.1038/nm1166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ribeiro PS, Cortez-Pinto H, Sola S, Castro RE, Ramalho RM, Baptista A, et al. Hepatocyte apoptosis, expression of death receptors, and activation of NF-kappaB in the liver of nonalcoholic and alcoholic steatohepatitis patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(9):1708–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40009.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu W, Baker RD, Bhatia T, Zhu L, Baker SS. Pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(10):1969–87. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2161-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Machado MV, Diehl AM. Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(8):1769–77. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES