Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Jun 4;29(50):76026–76035. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21167-0

Urban air quality in Xinjiang and snow chemistry of Urumqi Glacier No. 1 during COVID-19’s restrictions

Feiteng Wang 1, Xin Zhang 1, Fanglong Wang 1, Mengyuan Song 1, Zhongqin Li 1, Jing Ming 2,
PMCID: PMC9166164  PMID: 35665455

Abstract

The unprecedented COVID-19 outbreak impacted the world in many aspects. Air pollutants were largely reduced in cities worldwide in 2020. Using samples from two snow pits dug separately in 2019 and 2020 in Urumqi Glacier No. 1 (UG1) in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang), China, we measured water-stable isotopes, soluble ions, and black and organic carbon (BC and OC). Both carbon types show no significant variations in the snow-pit profiles dated from 2018 through 2020. The deposition of anthropogenically induced soluble ions (K+, Cl, SO42−, and NO3) in the snow decreased to 20–40% of their respective concentrations between 2019 and 2020; however, they increased 2- to fourfold from 2018 to 2019. We studied the daily concentrations of SO2 (2019–2020), NO2 (2015–2020), CO (2019–2020), and PM2.5 (2019–2020) measured in the sixteen major cities and towns across Xinjiang. The variabilities in these air pollutants were supposed to illustrate the air quality in the urban area and represent the change in the source area. The NO2 decreased in response to mobility restrictions imposed by local governments, while SO2, CO, and PM2.5 did not consistently correspond. This difference indicates that the restriction measures primarily affected traffic. The increases in chemical species in the snow from 2018 to 2019 and the subsequent decreases from 2019 to 2020 were consistent with the variations in SO2 and NO2 measured in urban air and estimated by MERRA-2 model. Therefore, the pandemic could possibly have an impact on snow chemistry of the Tien-Shan glaciers via reduced traffic and industrial intensity; more evidence would be obtained from ice cores, tree rings, and other archives in the future.

Keywords: COVID-19, Snow chemistry, Urumqi Glacier No. 1, Air pollutants

Introduction

At the end of 2019, a novel virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in Wuhan, China and spread worldwide in the following months (WHO 2020). The proliferation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases caused by SARS-CoV-2 urged the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a pandemic on 11 March 2020 (WHO 2021). At the time of this writing, COVID-19 has infected over 510 million people in almost every country on earth and caused 6.2 million deaths with infection cases in almost every country on earth (WHO 2022). In response, governments worldwide have enacted restriction policies when necessary to slow the viral spread (Han et al. 2020). Coinciding with these restriction measures, emissions (e.g. CO2, SO2, NO2, and other air pollutants) from anthropogenic activities (industry, tourism, transportation, agriculture, etc.) have dramatically declined (Friedlingstein et al. 2020).

Annual global CO2 emissions were estimated to have declined by 4 to 7% in 2020 compared to 2019, based on government policies and activity data (Le Quéré et al. 2020). Another study concluded that the reduction in greenhouse gases and air pollutants emissions reduced future warming by 0.3 ℃ by 2050 (Forster et al. 2020), although no near-future (2020–2024) impact on surface temperature was detected by Jones et al. (2021). During the global-scale lockdown (March to May 2020), PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations decreased by 16% and 46%, respectively, compared to the same period during 2015–2019 (He et al. 2021). In Somerville, MA, USA, a nearly 2-month measurement showed that ultrafine particle number concentration and black carbon (BC) concentration during lockdown were 60–68% and 22–46% lower than pre-pandemic levels (Hudda et al. 2020). In Milan, Italy, the mandated lockdown during February 2020 caused significant reductions in PM2.5, BC, CO, and NOx (Collivignarelli et al. 2020). In São Paulo, Brazil, the late March 2020 lockdown also decreased NOx and CO concentrations in the atmosphere by over 50% (Nakada &Urban 2020). In China, the average NO2 load in the atmospheric column over all cities dropped 40% in January–April 2020 compared with the same period in 2019, according to satellite measurements (Bauwens et al. 2020). However, a modelling study independent from the direct measurements estimated that the emissions of SO2, NOx, CO, non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), and primary PM2.5 decreased by 27%, 36%, 28%, 31%, and 24%, respectively, in February 2020 compared with those in February 2019 (Zheng et al. 2021).

Because chemical transformations in the atmosphere also have various roles in air quality, the reduction in the primary pollutants did not necessarily lead to air quality improvement but demonstrated complex chemical effects (Kroll et al. 2020). In the populous areas of eastern and northern China, the dramatic decrease in primary pollutants, specifically NOx, facilitated the formation of ozone and night-time NO3 radicals, which in turn fuelled the formation of secondary pollutants. Consequently, these secondary pollutants may have offset the effects of the decreased primary pollutants on air quality. This explains why unexpected haze events still occurred during the lockdown periods (Huang et al. 2020; Le et al. 2020).

The Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (hereafter “Xinjiang”) spans over 1.6 million km2, which is one-sixth of China’s total land area, and has ~ 25 million inhabitants (SBX 2020). With such a large area and relatively small population, the population density of Xinjiang is approximately 1/15 of the national average and is highly concentrated in the major cities in each prefecture-level administrative district (Mao et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2015). Relatively small urban populations in Xinjiang differ in air pollution features from those of the more populated eastern China. For example, a recent 3-year measurement reported that the concentrations of black carbon (BC) in Jimunai, a small town on the Kazakhstan-China border, were comparable to Beijing and increasing dramatically (Wang et al. 2021). An investigation into the air quality in 16 major cities in Xinjiang revealed that the daily mean PM2.5 concentrations were ~ 8–54 times higher than the WHO guideline (Rupakheti et al. 2021).

Following the lockdown that began on 23 January 2020 in Wuhan, the Xinjiang government quickly launched a level-1 Public Health Emergencies Response (PHER) in 2 days (January 25) (GXUARC 2020). In the following months, Xinjiang lifted these restrictions gradually to level-2, 3, 4, and normal from February 25 (SCC 2020), March 7 (Xnews 2020b), March 21 (Xnews 2020c), and September 1 (Pdaily 2020) onward, respectively (refer to Table S1 about PHER in the Supporting Information). The distribution of chimney-alike pollution sources within the vast and relatively lightly polluted background of Xinjiang drives us to study the effects of the lockdown controls employed by the local government on the air quality in the major cities during the pandemic.

The pollutants dispersed from sources would be transported over adjacent mountain glaciers and received by them via dry deposition and (or) wet scavenging. The glaciochemistry information preserved in snow and ice through air-snow exchange process (Elias 2021; Harder et al. 2000, Kreutz &Koffman 2013) provides an excellent archive to study the relationship between the reduced anthropogenic activities and the nearby glaciers records. For example, non-sea-salt sulphate in air and snow samples was measured to estimate the tropospheric residence time at the South Pole (Harder et al. 2000); Aerosol and fresh snow samples collected near Mt. Qomolangma (Everest) were measured for major ions to calculate their scavenging ratios (Ming et al. 2007); the seasonal variations of sulphate and methane sulfonic acid (MSA) in aerosol and snow at two sites of the Greenland Ice Sheet indicated a much less accumulation of winter snow at the summit (Jaffrezo et al. 1994). All above studies demonstrate the close relationship between air and snow chemistry and suggest the snow or glacio-chemistry can reflect the local or regional atmospheric environment.

In the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, a few reports predicted that the pandemic would likely leave traces in the future snow-and-ice records (Goyal 2020; NSF 2020). A recent remote-sensing work suggested a 30% reduction in the deposition of light-absorbing particles (BC, dust, etc.) in the Indus River Basin snow during the spring and summer of 2020 (Bair et al. 2021). However, a sole field measurement reported no change in BC levels on a Peruvian glacier before and during the pandemic (Sanchez-Rodriguez 2020). Xinjiang is a major area of mountain-glacier development in China (Aizen et al. 2007, Liu &Liu 2015, Liu et al. 2016). We suppose a possible perturbance in the glaciochemistry record in Xinjiang’s glaciers resulting from the pandemic in Xinjiang’s glaciers. In this study, we investigated glaciochemical-record abnormalities due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Urumqi Glacier No. 1 (UG1) (43.08°N, 86.80°E, ~ 3750–4500 m a.s.l.), at Tian-Shan Mountain, as it has conventional long-term snow-pit sampling (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The study area. The boundary of Xinjiang, the prefecture-level cities, and Urumqi Glacier No. 1 (UG1) are annotated individually. The World Hillshade image and the terrain and other labels in the map were provided by the ArcGIS Map Service and the ESRI Reference Overlay tool, respectively, from the QGIS software (QGIS.org 2021)

Material and methods

Snow sampling in UG1

The UG1 is a well-known mountain glacier and hosts a long-term conventional observation project. Each summer, research staff routinely dig snow pits and sample snow to study mass balance and snow physics and chemistry on the glacier. On 14 Jun 2019 and 18 Jun 2020, we dug a 180 cm deep snow pit and a 200 cm deep snow pit, respectively, at the equilibrium line altitude (4000 m above sea level) of the glacier, respectively. We sampled snow using Whirl–Pak® bags at a 10 cm interval alongside a ruler (see Fig. S1 in the Supporting Information). A scale was used to measure the snow density of each layer in the pits after sampling with a snow cutter. The samples were packed into the bags and transported at − 15 ℃ to the State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science in Lanzhou for further analysis. In the laboratory, snow samples were placed in a room-temperature cleanroom until melted entirely.

Measuring the snow chemistry in the laboratory

Measurements of oxygen-18, deuterium, and soluble ions

We used a liquid water isotope analyser (Model LWIA DLT-100, Los Gatos Research Inc, USA) to measure the oxygen-18 and deuterium isotope ratios (δ18O and δD) in our snow samples. The δ18O and δD values are relative to their counterparts in the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (V-SMOW), referencing the work of Craig (1961). Before analysing the samples, we measured the standards four times. Each sample was measured six times, but only the last four measurements were recorded to minimize the effects of cross-contamination between each standard and sample. The measurement errors for δ18O and δD were better than ± 0.25 ‰ and ± 1 ‰ (Lagura &Urbino 2011), respectively. We used an ion chromatography system (Model DX-320, Thermo Scientific Dionex™, USA) with an IonPac™ CS12A IC column to measure K+, Ca2+, Na+, Mg2+, and NH4+ and another model (ICS-1500, Thermo Scientific Dionex™, USA) with an IonPac™ AS11-HC column to measure SO42−, NO3, and Cl. The detection limits and standard deviations of the measured snow samples are shown in Table S3, in the Supporting Information.

Measurements of BC, organic carbon, and dust

We used quartz-fibre filters (Tissuquartz® 2500QAT-UP 47 mm, Pall™) to filter the samples. A vacuum pump was used to accelerate filtering, and the Whirl–Pak® bags and filter devices were flushed with deionized water to increase particle capture. We weighed the filters before and after filtering each sample and calculated the difference between the weights, which was considered the weight of retained mineral dust. The filters loaded with samples were dried in laminar-air flow conditions. A total of 0.5 cm2 sections was punched from the sample filters. We then used a multi-wavelength thermal-optical reflectance carbon analyser (DRI Model 2015, Magee Scientific Inc., USA) to measure BC and organic carbon (OC). The software of this analyser integrates the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments protocol (IMPROVE) and the thermal-optical reflectance method (Chow et al. 2001). A detailed description of this instrument, including its working principles and technical features, can be found in Chen et al. (2015).

Air-pollutant data in Xinjiang

We selected the capital cities of the sixteen prefecture-level administrative subregions in Xinjiang (Fig. 1 and Table S2 in the Supporting Information) to compare air quality before and during the pandemic. The daily average concentrations of four pollutants, SO2 (2019–2020), NO2 (2015–2020), CO (2019–2020), and PM2.5 (2019–2020), whose formations are closely related to human activities, were obtained from the daily reports of the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (2021) (http://www.cnemc.cn/ or http://106.37.208.233:20035/, last accessed: 10 July 2021). The monitoring of SO2, NO2, CO, and PM2.5 complied with the technical specifications for the operation and quality control of ambient air quality continuous automated monitoring systems under the guidance of the China National Environment Protection Standards (HJ 818–2018 and HJ 93–2013). The measuring stations were located in individual counties, and the data from each county within a prefecture were averaged together to obtain the prefecture-level values.

Results and discussion

Glaciochemistry in the snow pits of UG1

We dated the snow pits by inspecting seasonal variability in the δ18O, δD, dust layers, and net mass-accumulation records in the snow-pit profiles. In the Tien-Shan glaciers, δ18O and δD have shown significantly positive correlations with air temperatures (Yao et al. 2013), with less negative values during warmer seasons and more negative values during cooler seasons (Wang et al. 2017). This seasonality delineated the layers in the snow-pit profiles (Fig. 2a and b). The late spring dust layers were indicated by a horizon in the dust profile formed by intense ablation and scare snowfalls on UG1 (Fig. 2a), which helped to identify the melting season (May–August) (Fig. 2b). Net mass accumulation measurements by the Tien-Shan Glaciers Observation Station (2021) were referenced when dating the snow layers. Thus, the ages of the snow pits were quite refined to a monthly level of detail.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The water-stable isotope ratios (δ18O and δD), the deposition flux of BC, OC, and soluble ions (μg cm−2, = concentration × snow density × layer depth), and snow density (g cm−3) in the layers of the snow pits dug in Urumqi Glacier No. 1 on a 18 June 2020, and b 14 June 2019, respectively. The coloured shades (in a) and horizontally dashed lines (in b) illustrate the layers in the snow pits corresponding to the ages annotated on the right. The vertical dashed lines mark the average concentrations of the respective species in the layers dated to the most current year and previous years when the snow pits were sampled. The mineral ions (e.g. Ca2+ and Mg.2+) were more associated with background crust weathering (dust) in the UG1 area (Li et al. 2006)

A previous study suggested that primarily regional (within Xinjiang) air masses ended at the UG1 (46–87% seasonally) with few from farther sources (Zhang et al. 2020). Therefore, we anticipated that the deposition of air pollutants onto the Xinjiang glaciers would decrease due to the pandemic. We did not detect significant variations in BC, OC, and insoluble dust before and after the pandemic outbreak in the two snow-pit profiles (~ 2017–2020) (Fig. 2a and b). However, the soluble ion fluxes in the 2020 snow pit, especially K+, Cl, SO42−, and NO3, which are usually linked with industries, traffic, and agriculture, uniformly show a decrease in average deposition from 2019 to (Fig. 2a). In the 2019 snow pit, those ions consistently increased from 2017 to 2019 (Fig. 2b), possibly owing to increased regional emissions before the pandemic (Li et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2021). For more information, we included the concentration profiles in Fig. S2, which does not show significant differences from Fig. 2.

To better illustrate the variations in deposition flux for K+, Cl, SO42−, NO3, and BC recorded in the snow profiles during 2018–2020, Fig. 3a, b, and c show their average yearly concentrations. From 2019 to 2020, K+, Cl, SO42−, and NO3 significantly decreased, while from 2018 to 2019, they increased. However, there were no significant differences in BC before and after the COVID-19 outbreak, and only a marginal decrease from 2019 to 2020 (Fig. 3c), which was similar to the BC records reported in some Peruvian glaciers (Sanchez-Rodriguez 2020). Various studies have reported that BC and OC in the surface snow of some mountain glaciers were used to congregating in the dust layer with magnitudes of concentrations higher than other layers in a snowpit profile (Ming et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2012). The decreasing signals of BC and OC due to the reduced emissions were compromised by their high concentrations in the dust layers. The mean concentrations of K+, Cl, SO42−, and NO3 increased 2- to 4-folders from 2018 to 2019, but in 2020, shrank to 0.2–0.4 times their 2019 values (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Layer-averaged deposition fluxes for the year 2018, 2019, and 2020. a The average deposition fluxes of SO42−, NO3, K+, and Cl. in the layers dated to 2019 and 2020 in the snow pit dug on 18 June 2020; b the same dated to 2018 and 2019 in the snow pit dug on 14 June 2019; c the average deposition fluxes of BC in the snow layers dated to 2018, 2019, and 2020 in both snow-pit profiles; d the ratios in the deposition fluxes of the respective species comparing 2019 to 2018 and 2020 to 2019. The error bars mark the ± 1 × standard deviation. Note that Fig. S3 is a counterpart figure depicting concentration variations

Air pollutants in Xinjiang before and during COVID-19

With mobility restrictions adopted worldwide, air pollution in cities varied from normal to non-uniform decreases (Baldasano 2020; Higham et al. 2020; Otmani et al. 2020; Venter et al. 2020). For example, during the first 100 days of lockdown in the UK, which began on 23 March 2020, NO2 levels halved, but SO2 doubled (Higham et al. 2020). Previous studies suggested that gaseous air pollutants in Xinjiang resulted primarily from local emissions (e.g. powerplants, industry, and traffic) (Mamtimin &Meixner 2011, Petracchini et al. 2016), and backward air mass trajectory analysis suggested limited transboundary transport of pollutants, but not dominantly (Ming et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2020). In Xinjiang’s sixteen prefectures, pollutant concentrations (CO, NO2, PM2.5, and SO2) in 2020 showed non-uniform shifts from 2019 to 2020 with some complex changes throughout this period (see Fig. S4 and the conclusions drawn from it in Table 1). Among the four pollutants, NO2 dropped periodically in 15 out of the 16 prefectures (with Tacheng as the exception). PM2.5 and SO2 decreased separately in eight cities, and CO decreased in only five prefectures. The measured PM2.5 in concentration showed heterogeneous variations (both increasing and decreasing) at different sites in Xinjiang between 2019 and 2020 (Hammer et al. 2021). An independent modelling study also showed dramatic decreases in the emissions of SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 in Xinjiang during the January–April period between 2019 and 2020 (Zheng et al. 2021).

Table 1.

Number of prefectures with decreased air pollutants and percent decreases in the sixteen prefectures

Subject CO NO2 PM2.5 SO2
Prefectures where pollutants significantly decreased Bortala, Hami, Shihezi, Tacheng, and Urumqi All except Tacheng Korla, Bortala, Changji, Karamay, Shihezi, Tacheng, Urumqi, and Wujiaqu Korla, Changji, Ili, Kashgar, Kyrgyz, Shihezi, Tacheng, and Turpan
Number 5 15 8 8
% 31 94 50 50

NO2 in the atmosphere has been strongly linked with traffic and industries that burn fossil fuels (Degraeuwe et al. 2019). Major cities worldwide showed consistent declines in their NO2 concentrations due to lockdowns or mobility restrictions (Gao et al. 2021; Higham et al. 2020; Shi et al. 2021). In Xinjiang, most prefectures show two significant dips in NO2 during February–March and July–August of 2020, compared to those periods in 2019 (Fig. S4). Because of the consistency in NO2 variations among the prefectures in Xinjiang after the activity restrictions, we further examined NO2. We averaged the NO2 data of the sixteen prefectures as shown in Fig. 4. There was no significant difference in NO2 variations between the periods of 2015 to 2019 and 2019 to the pandemic. Two decreases in NO2 appear in February–March and July of 2020, which deviated from both 2015 to 2019 and 2019 (Fig. 2a and b). After the mobility restriction stage I began, the NO2 began to deviate from its previous-year track (2015–2019 in Fig. 4a or 2019 in Fig. 4b) in early February of 2020, and this deviation continued into a relatively loose restriction stage (IV) in Xinjiang.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Average NO2 measured in the major cities and towns for Xinjiang. a The 7-day smoothed concentrations of NO2 averaged from the sixteen prefectures in Xinjiang. The red and blue lines, which show ± 1 × standard deviation, represent 2015–2019 and 2020, respectively. The four stages of restrictions enforced by the Xinjiang government are marked with dashed lines and Roman numerals. The smaller histogram depicts the daily new cases in Xinjiang, with the majority occurring in Urumqi from mid-July to mid-August of 2020 when Urumqi announced to be in a “wartime-state” period (Xnews 2020a). From 1 September 2020 on, the government announced a return to normal. b The same as (a) but the red line represents only the year 2019

However, in mid-July 2020, new cases erupted in Urumqi after a nearly 5 months rest with no new cases in Xinjiang. The Urumqi authorities announced a citywide “wartime-state” period on 16 July 2020 (Xnews 2020a), equivalent to the strictest mobility restrictions, i.e. absolute lockdown. Besides Urumqi, no other prefectures were reported publicly to impose lockdown measures. The concentration of NO2 plunged in response to the lockdown (Figs. 4 and S2), suggesting that it was applied not only in Urumqi but also throughout Xinjiang. Thus, we scrutinized the openly accessible information released in websites for the Xinjiang government, newspapers (Renmin Daily, Xinhua Daily, etc.), and other information sources during the lockdown period. The application of the total lockdown throughout Xinjiang in July was later partially verified by private consultations with local officials. In contrast to NO2, no significantly abnormal CO, SO2, and PM2.5 values were observed in most prefectures during the same periods (Fig. 4S). The sensitivity of NO2 to mobility suggests that NO2 can be monitored in cities as an indicator of population mobility.

As the precursors of SO42− and NO3 in the snow, SO2 and NO2 in the air were used to test if the glaciochemistry in UG1 varied consistently with their airborne counterparts. We created the yearly maps of SO2 surface mass concentrations in the study area from 2018 to 2020 via NASA’s Giovanni web-server (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/) (Global Modelling Assimilation Office 2015) (Fig. 5a, b, and c). The patterns show that the central and northwest areas were more likely to impact the snow chemistry in UG1 due to the relatively high SO2 concentrations and regional transport by the climatological westerlies (Ming et al. 2009). The yearly area-averaged SO2 increased marginally from 1.17 μg m−3 in 2018 to 1.19 μg m−3 in 2019 and then decreased to 1.16 μg m−3 in 2020 (Fig. 5d). The variations in average NO2 from 2018 to 2020 showed similar changes (Fig. 5e). The urban air pollutants in the study area and glaciochemistry in UG1 (Figs. 2 and 3) are consistent; therefore the reduced industry, traffic, and other anthropogenic activities due to the pandemic restrictions suppressed the concentrations of pollutants in the atmosphere and reduced their deposition in UG1.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Map of the yearly averaged SO2 surface mass concentrations derived from the MERRA-2 model (data accessed from https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/ on 15 August 2021) for the study area (35–50°N, 70–100°E) in a 2018, b 2019, and c 2020, respectively; d the area-averaged yearly SO2 (μg m−3) from 2018 to 2020 derived from the data in (a), (b), and (c); e the average yearly NO2 (μg m.−3) measured in 16 major cities of Xinjiang from 2018 to 2020. The black circles indicate the area where the UG1 resides. The text on the top of a–c is “Time Averaged Map of SO2 Surface Mass Concentration (ENSEMBLE), time average hourly 0.5 × 0.625 deg…” for the specific year and this study area, respectively, with which the images are directly saved from the online model outputs (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/) and not editable

Conclusions

In Xinjiang, from late January 2020 through late August 2020 when the government imposed stringent restrictions, the primary air pollutants (SO2, CO, PM2.5, and NO2) were reduced in the major cities and towns throughout all sixteen prefectures. Compared to SO2, CO, and PM2.5, NO2 was the most sensitive air pollutant to the mobility restriction measures. During February–March 2020, when the highest level of restriction was imposed, NO2 concentrations notably decreased compared to the same period in 2019. In late July–August 2020, when Urumqi entered a “wartime” state, a similar decline in NO2 occurred throughout Xinjiang. We confirmed that the mobility restrictions were not only implemented in Urumqi but also throughout Xinjiang by examining government reports, consulting with local officials in private, and analysing local observations of atmospheric components.

The pandemic might also leave its marks on the UG1, which is a Tien-Shan glacier. The concentrations of species linked to anthropogenic activity showed dramatic decreases in the snow from 2019 to 2020, whereas they had increased from 2018 (and earlier) to 2019. The variations in SO42− and NO3 deposited on the surface of UG1 were consistent with their precursors, SO2 and NO2, in the study area. These variations were likely due to the mobility restriction measures that were enacted to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Additionally, over the last two decades, the emissions of BC from central Asian regions have increased greatly (Wang et al. 2021). We expected that mobility restriction measures around Xinjiang would significantly reduce the deposition of BC onto the glaciers. However, we did not observe significant variation in BC in the snow of UG1 from 2018 to 2020. The differences between the variations in BC and soluble ions recorded in UG1 deserve to be further studied in the future.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the field and laboratory staff for helping with the sampling and measurements.

Author contribution

FTW, XZ, FLW, MS, ZL, and JM drafted the manuscript; XZ, MS, and FLW processed the data and helped with the graphics; FTW, ZL, and JM conceived the main idea; FTW designed the experiment and completed the work and JM supervised the whole study.

Funding

This research is supported by the State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science (SKLCS-ZZ-2022), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFF0304400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42001066), and the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) program (2019QZKK0201).

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Aizen VB, Aizen EM, Kuzmichonok VA. Glaciers and hydrological changes in the Tien Shan: simulation and prediction. Environ Res Lett. 2007;2:045019. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bair E, Stillinger T, Rittger K, Skiles M (2021): COVID-19 lockdowns show reduced pollution on snow and ice in the Indus River Basin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Baldasano JM. COVID-19 lockdown effects on air quality by NO2 in the cities of Barcelona and Madrid (Spain) Sci Total Environ. 2020;741:140353. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauwens M, Compernolle S, Stavrakou T, Muller JF, van Gent J, Eskes H, Levelt PF, van der AR, Veefkind JP, Vlietinck J, Yu H, Zehner C (2020): Impact of coronavirus outbreak on NO2 pollution assessed using TROPOMI and OMI observations. Geophys Res Lett, e2020GL087978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Chen L, Chow J, Wang X, Robles J, Sumlin B, Lowenthal D, Zimmermann R, Watson J. Multi-wavelength optical measurement to enhance thermal/optical analysis for carbonaceous aerosol. Atmos Meas Tech. 2015;8:451–461. doi: 10.5194/amt-8-451-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (2021): Real-time air quality monitoring data
  7. Chow JC, Watson JG, Crow D, Lowenthal DH, Merrifield T. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Sci Tech. 2001;34:23–34. doi: 10.1080/02786820119073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collivignarelli MC, Abbà A, Bertanza G, Pedrazzani R, Ricciardi P, Carnevale Miino M. Lockdown for CoViD-2019 in Milan: what are the effects on air quality? Sci Total Environ. 2020;732:139280. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Craig H. Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science. 1961;133:1702. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3465.1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Degraeuwe B, Pisoni E, Peduzzi E, De Meij A, Monforti-Ferrario F, Bodis K, Mascherpa A, Astorga-Llorens M, Thunis P, Vignati E. Urban NO2 Atlas. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Elias S (2021): Greenland ice sheet, threats to the arctic, pp. 265–321
  12. Forster PM, Forster HI, Evans MJ, Gidden MJ, Jones CD, Keller CA, Lamboll RD, Quéré CL, Rogelj J, Rosen D, Schleussner C-F, Richardson TB, Smith CJ, Turnock ST (2020): Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19. Nat Clim Change [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Friedlingstein P, et al. Global Carbon Budget 2020. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2020;12:3269–3340. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao C, Li S, Liu M, Zhang F, Achal V, Tu Y, Zhang S, Cai C (2021): Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on air pollution in Chinese megacities from the perspective of traffic volume and meteorological factors. Sci Total Environ, 145545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Global Modeling Assimilation Office (2015): MERRA‐2 tavgM_2d_aer_Nx: 2D, monthly mean, time‐averaged, single‐level, assimilation, aerosol diagnostics (extended), V5. 12.4.
  16. Goyal R (2020): Glaciers May Record the Story of the Coronavirus Pandemic
  17. GXUARC (2020): Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region launched a major public health emergencies level-1 response. Government of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China, Xinjiang
  18. Hammer MS, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, McDuffie EE, Lyapustin A, Sayer AM, Hsu NC, Levy RC, Garay MJ, Kalashnikova OV, Kahn RA (2021): Effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on fine particulate matter concentrations. Science Advances 7, eabg7670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Han E, Tan MMJ, Turk E, Sridhar D, Leung GM, Shibuya K, Asgari N, Oh J, García-Basteiro AL, Hanefeld J, Cook AR, Hsu LY, Teo YY, Heymann D, Clark H, McKee M, Legido-Quigley H. Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe. The Lancet. 2020;396:1525–1534. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32007-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harder S, Warren SG, Charlson RJ. Sulfate in air and snow at the South Pole: implications for transport and deposition at sites with low snow accumulation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2000;105:22825–22832. doi: 10.1029/2000JD900351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. He C, Hong S, Zhang L, Mu H, Xin A, Zhou Y, Liu J, Liu N, Su Y, Tian Y, Ke B, Wang Y, Yang L. Global, continental, and national variation in PM2.5, O3, and NO2 concentrations during the early 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. Atmos Pollut Res. 2021;12:136–145. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2021.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Higham JE, Ramirez CA, Green MA, Morse AP (2020): UK COVID-19 lockdown: 100 days of air pollution reduction? Air Qual Atmos Health, 1–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Huang X et al. (2020): Enhanced secondary pollution offset reduction of primary emissions during COVID-19 lockdown in China. National Science Review [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Hudda N, Simon MC, Patton AP, Durant JL. Reductions in traffic-related black carbon and ultrafine particle number concentrations in an urban neighborhood during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Total Environ. 2020;742:140931. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jaffrezo J-L, Davidson CI, Legrand M, Dibb JE. Sulfate and MSA in the air and snow on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 1994;99:1241–1253. doi: 10.1029/93JD02913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones CD et al. (2021): The climate response to emissions reductions due to COVID-19: initial results from CovidMIP. Geophys Res Lett 48, e2020GL091883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Kreutz KJ, Koffman BG (2013): ICE CORE METHODS | Glaciochemistry, Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science, pp. 326–333
  28. Kroll JH, Heald CL, Cappa CD, Farmer DK, Fry JL, Murphy JG, Steiner AL. The complex chemical effects of COVID-19 shutdowns on air quality. Nat Chem. 2020;12:777–779. doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-0535-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lagura CF, Urbino GA (2011): Liquid water isotope analyzer (LWIA) equipment and method validation and its application to hydrology. Integrated Chemists of the Philippines, Philippines
  30. Le Quéré C, Jackson RB, Jones MW, Smith AJP, Abernethy S, Andrew RM, De-Gol AJ, Willis DR, Shan Y, Canadell JG, Friedlingstein P, Creutzig F, Peters GP. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat Clim Change. 2020;10:647–653. doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Le T, Wang Y, Liu L, Yang J, Yung YL, Li G, Seinfeld JH (2020): Unexpected air pollution with marked emission reductions during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science, eabb7431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Li C, Martin RV, van Donkelaar A, Boys BL, Hammer MS, Xu JW, Marais EA, Reff A, Strum M, Ridley DA, Crippa M, Brauer M, Zhang Q. Trends in chemical composition of global and regional population-weighted fine particulate matter estimated for 25 years. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:11185–11195. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li Z, Edwards R, Mosley-Thompson E, Wang F, Dong Z, You X, Li H, Li C, Zhu Y. Seasonal variability of ionic concentrations in surface snow and elution processes in snow–firn packs at the PGPI site on Ürümqi glacier No. 1, eastern Tien Shan. China Annals of Glaciology. 2006;43:250–256. doi: 10.3189/172756406781812069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu Q, Liu S. Response of glacier mass balance to climate change in the Tianshan Mountains during the second half of the twentieth century. Clim Dyn. 2015;46:303–316. doi: 10.1007/s00382-015-2585-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu S, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Sun M (2016): Impacts and risks of climate change –– climate change impact and risk study on glaciers. Climate Change Impacts and Risks in Key Areas Series. Science Press, Beijing, 237 pp
  36. Mamtimin B, Meixner FX. Air pollution and meteorological processes in the growing dryland city of Urumqi (Xinjiang, China) Sci Total Environ. 2011;409:1277–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mao Q, Long Y, Wu K (2016): Spatio-temporal changes of population density and urbanization pattern in China (2000–2010). China City Planning Review 25
  38. Ming J, Zhang DQ, Kang SC, Tian WS (2007): Aerosol and fresh snow chemistry in the East Rongbuk Glacier on the northern slope of Mt. Qomolangma (Everest). J Geophys Res-Atmos 112
  39. Ming J, Xiao C, Cachier H, Qin D, Qin X, Li Z, Pu J. Black carbon (BC) in the snow of glaciers in west China and its potential effects on albedos. Atmos Res. 2009;92:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nakada LYK, Urban RC. COVID-19 pandemic: impacts on the air quality during the partial lockdown in São Paulo state. Brazil Sci Total Environ. 2020;730:139087. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. NSF (2020): Glacial ice will likely hold records of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers say
  42. Otmani A, Benchrif A, Tahri M, Bounakhla M, Chakir EM, El Bouch M, Krombi Mh. Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on PM10, SO2 and NO2 concentrations in Salé City (Morocco) Sci Total Environ. 2020;735:139541. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pdaily (2020): Xinjiang gradually restore normal production and life order. Government of China, Beijing
  44. Petracchini F, Paciucci L, Vichi F, D'Angelo B, Aihaiti A, Liotta F, Paolini V, Cecinato A. Gaseous pollutants in the city of Urumqi, Xinjiang: spatial and temporal trends, sources and implications. Atmos Pollut Res. 2016;7:925–934. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. QGIS.org (2021): QGIS geographic information system. QGIS Association
  46. Rupakheti D, Yin X, Rupakheti M, Zhang Q, Li P, Rai M, Kang S. Spatio-temporal characteristics of air pollutants over Xinjiang, northwestern China. Environ Pollut. 2021;268:115907. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sanchez-Rodriguez W (2020): No change in black carbon levels on Peruvian glaciers, despite pandemic quarantine
  48. SBX (2020): 2019 Xinjiang Statistic National Data. Statistics Bureau of Xinjiang, Urumqi
  49. SCC (2020): Xinjiang pandemic prevention and control emergency response adjusted to level-2. Government of China, Xinjiang
  50. Shi Z, Song C, Liu B, Lu G, Xu J, Van Vu T, Elliott RJR, Li W, Bloss WJ, Harrison RM (2021): Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science Advances 7, eabd6696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  51. Tien-Shan Glaciers Observation Station (2021): Mass balance observation data of glacier no. 1 at the headwaters of Urumqi River, Tianshan Mountains
  52. Venter ZS, Aunan K, Chowdhury S, Lelieveld J. COVID-19 lockdowns cause global air pollution declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:18984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006853117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang L, Zhang X, Ming J. Aerosol optical properties measured using a PAX in Central Asia from 2016 to 2019 and the climatic and environmental outlooks. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry. 2021;5:95–105. doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang S, Zhang M, Crawford J, Hughes CE, Du M, Liu X. The effect of moisture source and synoptic conditions on precipitation isotopes in arid central Asia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2017;122:2667–2682. doi: 10.1002/2015JD024626. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. WHO 2020: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report – 82
  56. WHO (2021): Timeline: WHO’s COVID-19 response
  57. WHO . WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. Geneva: WHO; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu K, Long Y, Mao Q, Liu X. Featured graphic. Mushrooming Jiedaos, growing cities: an alternative perspective on urbanizing China. Environ Plan A. 2015;47:1–2. doi: 10.1068/a140066g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xnews (2020a): Urumqi entered the pandemic prevention and control “wartime” state
  60. Xnews (2020b): Xinjiang (including the Corps) new Covid-19 outbreak prevention and control emergency response level adjusted to a level-3 response. Government of China, Xinjiang
  61. Xnews (2020c): Xinjiang’s new Covid-19 outbreak prevention and control emergency response level adjusted to level-4. Government of China, Xinjiang
  62. Xu B, Cao J, Joswiak DR, Liu X, Zhao H, He J. Post-depositional enrichment of black soot in snow-pack and accelerated melting of Tibetan glaciers. Environ Res Lett. 2012;7:014022. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yao T, Masson-Delmotte V, Gao J, Yu W, Yang X, Risi C, Sturm C, Werner M, Zhao H, He Y, Ren W, Tian L, Shi C, Hou S. A review of climatic controls on δ18O in precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau: observations and simulations. Rev Geophys. 2013;51:525–548. doi: 10.1002/rog.20023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang X, Li Z, Ming J, Wang F (2020): One-year measurements of equivalent black carbon, optical properties, and sources in the Urumqi River Valley, Tien Shan, China. Atmosphere-Basel 11
  65. Zheng B, Zhang Q, Geng G, Chen C, Shi Q, Cui M, Lei Y, He K. Changes in China’s anthropogenic emissions and air quality during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Earth System Science Data. 2021;13:2895–2907. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-2895-2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].


Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES